Nurse's RoleNCT06004492
Technology-assisted Blended Learning on Motivational Interviewing for Mental Health Nurses and Its Clinical Impact
A study testing blended learning program in people with Nurse's Role, run by National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
Medication adherence is the primary care to stabilize the symptoms of patients with schizophrenia, but more than half of community patients still do not adhere to medication. According to the latest research of our team, the motivational interviewing may be more effective in promoting medication adherence than the… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 64 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Nurse's Role
- What is being tested?
- blended learning program
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 274 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- 8 Sep 2022to 31 May 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 64 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- mental health registered Nurse who take care of patients.
Who cannot join
- expected to leave the job within two months
- over 65 years old
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Taiwan1 site
National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences
Taipei, 112303
About this study
Official title: Effectiveness of an Integrated Program Combining Technology-assisted Blended Learning in Enhancing Motivational Interviewing Knowledge, Skills, Self-efficacy, and Its Impact on Patient Medication Adherence
Medication adherence is the primary care to stabilize the symptoms of patients with schizophrenia, but more than half of community patients still do not adhere to medication. According to the latest research of our team, the motivational interviewing may be more effective in promoting medication adherence than the insight. In the past, there was a lack of theoretical and empirical motivational interviewing and integrated medication adherence program. Therefore, the first year of this plan has completed the construction of integrated medication adherence. Considering the current lack of training and promotion of the blended learning model assisted by convenient and effective mobile technology.
Aim: To develop and evaluate the effectiveness of an integrated program combining technology-assisted blended learning on motivational interviewing knowledge, skills, and self-efficacy for psychiatric mental health nurses, and its clinical impact.
- Conditions
- Nurse's Role
- Being tested
- blended learning program
- Keywords
- blend learning, technology-assisted practice learning, motivational interviewing, mentaj health nurse
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
blended learning programBehavioural
Also called Motivational Interviewing Care Competence Based on Blended Learning
blended learning program: 8 hours of workshops and four months of practical learning on technology platforms.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| blended learning program | Placebo comparator | 8 hours of workshops and four months of practical learning on technology platforms Receives: Behavioral: blended learning program |
| conventional education | No intervention | conventional education |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
motivational interviewing skill
Motivational Interviewing skill is a 12-items assessment tool.Total scores is range between 0 and 12, with a higher score indicating better skill.
Measured: The time points of measurement are the baseline for nurses, the changes 8 hours after the workshop training, and the changes 4 months after the technology-assisted learning.
Secondary outcomes (6)
Motivational Interviewing Knowledge and Attitudes Test (MIKAT)
Motivational Interviewing Knowledge and Attitudes Test is a 29-items self-reporting scales.Total scores on the MIKAT range between 0 and 29, with a higher score indicating better knowledge.
Measured: The time points of measurement are the baseline for nurses, the changes 8 hours after the workshop training, and the changes 4 months after the technology-assisted learning.
Motivational Interviewing Confidence Survey (MICS)
MICS is a 24-items self-reporting with 10-point Likert scale.Total scores on the MICS range between 0 and 240, with a higher score indicating better self-efficacy.
Measured: The time points of measurement are the baseline for nurses, the changes 8 hours after the workshop training, and the changes 4 months after the technology-assisted learning.
Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS)
The Medication Adherence Rating Scale(MARS) is a 10-item self-reporting multidimensional instrument describing three dimensions: medication adherence behavior (items 1-4), attitude toward taking medication (items 5-8) and negative side effects and attitudes to psychotropic medication (items 9-10). sponse consistent with non-adherence is coded as 0, whereas a response consistent with adherence is coded as 1. For questions 1-6 and 9-10, a no response is indicative of adherence and is coded as 1, while for questions 7 and 8, a yes response is indicative of adherence and is coded as 1. Total scores on the MARS may range between 0 and 10, with a higher score indicating better medication adherence.
Measured: The time points of measurement are the baseline for patients, the changes 6 months after motivational interviewing care based on blended learning, and the changes at 9 months in clinical effects.
Drug Attitude Inventory (DAI-10)
The Drug Attitude Inventory(DAI-10) contains six items that a patient who is fully adherent to prescribed medication would answer as 'True', and four they would rate as 'False'. Scores are allocated to each answer and the total score is calculated in the same way as for the DAI-30. The range is -4 to 6 points. The higher the score, the more positive the attitude of taking the medicine, with 0 points as the cut-off point, above 0 means the attitude of taking the medicine is positive; below 0 means the attitude of taking the medicine is negative
Measured: The time points of measurement are the baseline for patients, the changes 6 months after motivational interviewing care based on blended learning, and the changes at 9 months in clinical effects.
University of Rhode Island Changed Assessment (URICA)
The University of Rhode Island Change Assessment Scale (URICA) is a 32 item self-report measure that includes 4 subscales measuring the stages of change: Precontemplation, Contemplation, Action, and Maintenance (there is also a 24 item version). Responses are given on a 5 point Likert scale ranging from (1=strong disagreement to 5=strong agreement),Calculate the score with its calculation formula, and get a score ranging from -2 to 14. The higher the score, the stronger the motivation to change.
Measured: The time points of measurement are the baseline for patients, the changes 6 months after motivational interviewing care based on blended learning, and the changes at 9 months in clinical effects.
Brief Psychiatric Rating scale (BPRS)
The Brief Psychiatric Rating scale(BPRS) assesses the level of 18 symptom constructs such as hostility, suspiciousness, hallucination, and grandiosity. It is particularly useful in gauging the efficacy of treatment in patients who have moderate to severe psychoses.Total scores on the MARS may range between 0 and 10, with a higher score indicating better medication adherence.This scale is scored from 0-6, with a total of 16 items, and the total score ranges from 0 to 96. The higher the score, the more obvious the psychiatric symptoms
Measured: The time points of measurement are the baseline for patients, the changes 6 months after motivational interviewing care based on blended learning, and the changes at 9 months in clinical effects.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Aug 2023
- Study start8 Sep 2022
- Primary completion31 May 2025
- Study completion31 May 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Nurse's RoleStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- blended learning program (8 hours of workshops and four months of practical learning on technology platforms); control group received conventional education
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 274 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Wen I Liu, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06004492
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- blended learning
- Status last verified
- Dec 2024
- First submitted
- 16 Aug 2023
- Last updated
- 9 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Hsieh WL, Li IH, Hung TM, Chiu CK, Liu WI. Effectiveness of a sequential simulation and online learning intervention on psychiatric mental health nurses' motivational interviewing knowledge, confidence, and skill performance for medication adherence: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2026 Jul 18:S1976-1317(26)00063-0. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2026.07.001. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42471192
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectiveness of an Integrated Program Combining Technology-assisted Blended Learning in Enhancing Motivational Interviewing Knowledge, Skills, Self-efficacy, and Its Impact on Patient Medication Adherence
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06004492
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- blended learning
- Conditions
- Nurse's Role
- Keywords
- blend learning, technology-assisted practice learning, motivational interviewing, mentaj health nurse
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 274 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- National Taipei University of Nursing and Health SciencesUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 8 Sep 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 May 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 May 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Medication adherence is the primary care to stabilize the symptoms of patients with schizophrenia, but more than half of community patients still do not adhere to medication. According to the latest research of our team, the motivational interviewing may be more effective in promoting medication adherence than the insight. In the past, there was a lack of theoretical and empirical motivational interviewing and integrated medication adherence program. Therefore, the first year of this plan has completed the construction of integrated medication adherence. Considering the current lack of training and promotion of the blended learning model assisted by convenient and effective mobile technology.
Aim: To develop and evaluate the effectiveness of an integrated program combining technology-assisted blended learning on motivational interviewing knowledge, skills, and self-efficacy for psychiatric mental health nurses, and its clinical impact.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- blended learning program (8 hours of workshops and four months of practical learning on technology platforms); control group received conventional education
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| blended learning program | Placebo comparator | Behavioral: blended learning program8 hours of workshops and four months of practical learning on technology platforms |
| conventional education | No intervention | –conventional education |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 64 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- mental health registered Nurse who take care of patients.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- expected to leave the job within two months
- over 65 years old
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| blended learning programAlso: Motivational Interviewing Care Competence Based on Blended Learningblended learning program: 8 hours of workshops and four months of practical learning on technology platforms. | Behavioural | blended learning program |
Primary outcome
motivational interviewing skill
Time frame: The time points of measurement are the baseline for nurses, the changes 8 hours after the workshop training, and the changes 4 months after the technology-assisted learning.
Motivational Interviewing skill is a 12-items assessment tool.Total scores is range between 0 and 12, with a higher score indicating better skill.
6 secondary outcomes
Motivational Interviewing Knowledge and Attitudes Test (MIKAT)
Time frame: The time points of measurement are the baseline for nurses, the changes 8 hours after the workshop training, and the changes 4 months after the technology-assisted learning.
Motivational Interviewing Confidence Survey (MICS)
Time frame: The time points of measurement are the baseline for nurses, the changes 8 hours after the workshop training, and the changes 4 months after the technology-assisted learning.
Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS)
Time frame: The time points of measurement are the baseline for patients, the changes 6 months after motivational interviewing care based on blended learning, and the changes at 9 months in clinical effects.
Drug Attitude Inventory (DAI-10)
Time frame: The time points of measurement are the baseline for patients, the changes 6 months after motivational interviewing care based on blended learning, and the changes at 9 months in clinical effects.
University of Rhode Island Changed Assessment (URICA)
Time frame: The time points of measurement are the baseline for patients, the changes 6 months after motivational interviewing care based on blended learning, and the changes at 9 months in clinical effects.
Brief Psychiatric Rating scale (BPRS)
Time frame: The time points of measurement are the baseline for patients, the changes 6 months after motivational interviewing care based on blended learning, and the changes at 9 months in clinical effects.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Oct 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42471192Hsieh WL, Li IH, Hung TM, Chiu CK, Liu WI. Effectiveness of a sequential simulation and online learning intervention on psychiatric mental health nurses' motivational interviewing knowledge, confidence, and skill performance for medication adherence: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2026 Jul 18:S1976-1317(26)00063-0. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2026.07.001. Online ahead of print.
Related trials for Nurse's Role
Not yet recruiting
The Effect of Creative Drama on the Therapeutic Communication Skills and Empathy Levels of Pediatric Nursing Students: A Randomized Controlled Study
Nurse's Role, Empathy
Active, not recruiting
Advancing Nursing Practices in Hospital Oncology Care
Gastrointestinal Cancer, Gastrointestinal Disease
RecruitingPhase 1
Two Different Therapeutic Interventions Applied During Blood Sampling in Children
Blood Sampling, Child, Only
Recruiting
Single Lumen Midline Catheter vs Ultrasound Guided Peripheral IV as Performed by Bedside Emergency Department Registered Nurses
Difficult Vein Access, Emergency Department Patients
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Research-patientS and Clinical researcH Nurses: Exploring Their Experiences of tAking paRt in Clinical resEarch in the NHS
Experiences, Lived Experiences
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing blended learning program in people with Nurse's Role, run by National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
motivational interviewing skill (time frame: The time points of measurement are the baseline for nurses, the changes 8 hours after the workshop training, and the changes 4 months after the technology-assisted learning.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06004492, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Oct 2026.