AzTrials
AzTrials

Distal Radius FractureNCT06005857

Paper- vs Digital Application-based Exercises to Support Rehabilitation After Osteosynthesis of Distal Radius Fracture

A study testing Standard hand therapy + home digital application-based exercises and standard hand therapy + home paper-based exercises in people with Distal Radius Fracture, run by Hôpital Fribourgeois at 1 site in Switzerland.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the difference between the use of paper- versus application-based (smartphone application) exercises in the rehabilitation of intra-articular fractures of the distal radius at the Cantonal Hospital of Fribourg, Switzerland. The operation itself will proceed as usual. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Distal Radius Fracture
What is being tested?
Standard hand therapy + home digital application-based exercises and standard hand therapy + home paper-based exercises
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteSwitzerland
Study dates
23 Jan 2024to 30 Jun 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Complete intra-articular DRF (classification AO 23 C1, C2 or C3)
  • Simple palmar operative approach
  • Simple palmar plate fixation
  • Age 18-65 years
  • Worker
  • Own either a smartphone or other wireless device
  • Consent form signed
  • French or German speaker

Who cannot join

  • Extra-articular or partial-articular DRF
  • Double/triple operative approaches needed
  • Bilateral procedure
  • Fracture aged than more of 2 weeks
  • Patient refusal/no informed consent
  • Inability to give informed consent
  • Previous wrist injury or surgery
  • Rheumatoid polyarthritis

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Thomas TM Mészaros, MD contact

0041 26 306 27 90

thomas.meszaros@h-fr.ch

Switzerland1 site, 1 recruiting
  • HFR Fribourg

    Fribourg, 1708

    Daniel Estoppey, +41 26 306 27 90, daniel.estoppey@gmail.com

    Thomas Mészaros, Dr, +41 26 306 27 90, thomas.meszaros@h-fr.ch

    Recruiting

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: Use of Paper- Versus Digital Application-based Exercises to Support the Rehabilitation of People Operated by a Palmar Plate for an Intra-articular Distal Radius Fracture. A Multidisciplinary, Prospective, Randomized, Single-blind, Controlled Trial

The aim of this study is to evaluate the difference between the use of paper- versus application-based (smartphone application) exercises in the rehabilitation of intra-articular fractures of the distal radius at the Cantonal Hospital of Fribourg, Switzerland.

The operation itself will proceed as usual. However, the rehabilitation will be aided by exercises based either on a paper support or on a digital application (smartphone application), in addition to follow-up by a hand therapist.

The aim is to determine which support provides the best improvement in wrist mobility and function, and to speed up the return to work.

Read the detailed description

The aims of this study are:

  1. To measure range of motion (flexion and extension) of the wrist in usual post-operative hand therapy sustained by the use of a digital application-based home exercise program compared with usual post-operative hand therapy sustained by the use of paper-based (standard) home exercice program.
  2. To measure the following variables in usual post-operative hand therapy sustained by the use of a digital application-based home exercise program compared with usual post-operative hand therapy sustained by the use of paper-based (standard) home exercice program:
  • Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation score
  • Return to work
  • Retorn to leisure
  • Range of motion in pronation and supination, in radial deviation and ulnar deviation
  • Distal radio-ulnar joint stability
  • Grip strength
  • Key pinch strength
  • Tripod pinch strength
  • Fracture healing
  • Fracture displacement
  • Patient satisfaction with exercise support
  • Patient participation in rehabilitation

Co-primary endpoint: range of motion (ROM) of the wrist, i.e. measured in degrees in flexion and extension.

Secondary endpoints:

  • Clinical scores Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE). The Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score is to be completed by the patient himself, validated in French and in German. Pain score is measured by 5 items and function is measured by 10 items. The total score is based on 100 points. The best score is 0 and the worst score is 100.
  • Partial sick-leave stoppage
  • Total sick-leave stoppage
  • Return to principal leisure
  • Range of motion in pronation and supination, in radial deviation and ulnar deviation
  • Distal radio-ulnar joint stability (compared with the healthy side)
  • Grip strength (Hydraulic hand dynamometer JAMAR®), i.e. measured in kilograms
  • Key pinch strength (B\&L Engineering® Pinch Gauge), i.e. measured in kilograms
  • Tripod pinch strength (B\&L Engineering® Pinch Gauge), i.e. measured in kilograms
  • Fracture healing
  • Fracture displacement
  • Patient satisfaction with exercise support
  • Patient participation in rehabilitation

This research is a national, interdisciplinary, prospective, single-blind (investigator), parallel-group (experimental study, level of evidence I), monocentric (conducted at the HFR Fribourg - Hôpital cantonal) study.

All patients will undergo the same operative procedure. Upon arrival to the operating room, patients will be placed in supine position, the injured limb resting on a hand table. Standard anesthetic axillary nerve will be applied. All the operation will do by an experienced hand surgeon having minimum 5 years of post-specialization clinical experience. A standard modified Henry approach will be done. The DRF will be reduced and fixed with a palmar plate (Aptus Adaptive II, Medartis®). The stability of the distal radio ulnar joint (DRUJ) will be tested after the radius fixation. If the DRUJ will be instable, the ulnar styloid fracture will be fixed (osteo suture (PDS wire) or screw fixation (Aptus CCS 1.7/2.2, Medartis®).

The study participants will be allocated (randomization) to either Group 1 (standard hand therapy + home smartphone application-based exercises) or Group 2 (standard hand therapy + home paper-based exercises). The two groups will be matched as good as possible in terms of total numbers of participants per group, age (18-40 years or 41-65 years) and type of work (non-manual work or manual work) in order to minimize any possible bias due to structural differences in both groups.

All patients will undergo the same postoperative splint immobilization (removable palmar custom splint) for 6 weeks.

Patients will be randomly assigned to receive either a standard hand therapy program + smartphone application-based exercises or a standard hand therapy program + paper-based exercises. The follow-up will consist of a one-to-one therapy session per week durung 12 for monitoring, i.e. range of motion, swelling, scar, eventual adverse event, and the way of practicing exercises. In-person sessions will be supervised by a therapist involved in the study, who is certified in hand rehabilitation. Moreover, each patient is expected to practice by himself a daily home exercises program consisting of mobilization of the (i) thumb and (ii) long fingers in flexion-extension and mobilization of the (iii) wrist in flexion-extension, radio-ulnar inclination and pro-supination. Each exercise will be performed in 3 sets of 15 repetitions, 5 times a day. Strengthening exercises (iv) will be added from the sixth week post-surgery. Each training session will last around 15 minutes, and be repeated after a three-hours break. They are standard exercises used in the treatment of DRF and validated by several guidelines. If necessary, the treatment will be pursued after 12 weeks.

Each patient will be asked to fill in a paper daily diary on the number of exercises performed (number of repetitions actually performed per set requested, how many times per day). They will also be asked to fill in the level of pain felt at that time. A satisfaction questionnaire will be completed at the end of the treatment concerning the support (digital vs paper) used.

At 6 and 12 weeks, the blinded surgeon (not aware of the therapy the patient is undergoing) will research any clinical or radiological adverse events.

At 6 and 12 weeks, a blinded independent observer (not aware of the therapy the patient is undergoing) will measure the values required to achieve the aims 1 and 2.

Aim 1 :

An independent observer who is not the surgeon will measure, at 6 and 12 weeks, range of motion (flexion and extension) of patients of both groups (Group 1, with standard hand therapy + home digital application-based exercises; Group 2, with standard hand therapy + home paper-based exercises) with photography (Figure 11) and with a goniometer.

Aim 2 :

Patients of both groups (Group 1, with standard hand therapy + home digital application-based exercises; Group 2, with standard hand therapy + home paper-based exercises), the following variables will be measured:

  • Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE)
  • Return to work
  • Retorn to leisure
  • Range of motion in pronation and supination, in radial deviation and ulnar deviation
  • Distal radio-ulnar joint stability
  • Grip strength
  • Key pinch strength
  • Tripod pinch strength
  • Fracture healing
  • Fracture displacement
  • Patient satisfaction with exercise support
  • Patient participation in rehabilitation
Being tested
Standard hand therapy + home digital application-based exercises, standard hand therapy + home paper-based exercises
Keywords
distal radius fracture, smartphone application, post-operative rehabilitation, open reduction and internal fixation, range of motion
Medical subject headings
Wrist Fractures

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Standard hand therapy + home digital application-based exercisesOther

    Standard post-operative hand rehabilitation and home digital application-based exercises

  • standard hand therapy + home paper-based exercisesOther

    Standard post-operative hand rehabilitation and home paper-based exercises

Study groups in NCT06005857
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Experimental groupExperimentalThe group will receive standard hand therapy program + rehabilitation program sustained by the use of a digital application.
Receives: Other: Standard hand therapy + home digital application-based exercises
Control groupActive comparatorThe control group will receive a standard hand therapy program + paper-based (standard) rehabilitation program.
Receives: Other: standard hand therapy + home paper-based exercises

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Range of motion in flexion-extension

    Measurement (in degrees) of joint mobility using a goniometer

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Wrist fonction score

    Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation score at 6 and 12 weeks after surgery.

    The Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation score measure the pain score of all 5 items, measure the function score of all the 10 items. The total score the sum of pain and function scores. The best score is 0 and the worst score is 100.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Aug 2023
  2. Study start23 Jan 2024
  3. Primary completion15 Mar 2024
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
40 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06005857
Sponsor's protocol ID
PhysiAppHFR
Status last verified
Apr 2024
First submitted
9 Aug 2023
Last updated
23 Apr 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Data will be secured and anonymized, and analyzed only by the principal investigator.

Publications

  • Lu C, Hu Y, Xie J, Fu Q, Leigh I, Governor S, Wang G. The Use of Mobile Health Applications to Improve Patient Experience: Cross-Sectional Study in Chinese Public Hospitals. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 May 23;6(5):e126. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9145.

    PubMed 29792290
  • Valdes K, Gendernalik E, Hauser J, Tipton M. Use of mobile applications in hand therapy. J Hand Ther. 2020 Apr-Jun;33(2):229-234. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2019.10.003. Epub 2020 Apr 3.

    PubMed 32253058
  • Murfin M. Know your apps: an evidence-based approach to evaluation of mobile clinical applications. J Physician Assist Educ. 2013;24(3):38-40. doi: 10.1097/01367895-201324030-00008.

    PubMed 24261171
  • Wallace S, Clark M, White J. 'It's on my iPhone': attitudes to the use of mobile computing devices in medical education, a mixed-methods study. BMJ Open. 2012 Aug 24;2(4):e001099. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001099. Print 2012.

    PubMed 22923627
  • Lyngcoln A, Taylor N, Pizzari T, Baskus K. The relationship between adherence to hand therapy and short-term outcome after distal radius fracture. J Hand Ther. 2005 Jan-Mar;18(1):2-8; quiz 9. doi: 10.1197/j.jht.2004.10.008.

    PubMed 15674780
  • Wakefield AE, McQueen MM. The role of physiotherapy and clinical predictors of outcome after fracture of the distal radius. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000 Sep;82(7):972-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.82b7.10377.

    PubMed 11041584
  • Brehmer JL, Husband JB. Accelerated rehabilitation compared with a standard protocol after distal radial fractures treated with volar open reduction and internal fixation: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Oct 1;96(19):1621-30. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00860.

    PubMed 25274787
  • Kay S, McMahon M, Stiller K. An advice and exercise program has some benefits over natural recovery after distal radius fracture: a randomised trial. Aust J Physiother. 2008;54(4):253-9. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(08)70004-7.

    PubMed 19025505
  • Christensen OM, Kunov A, Hansen FF, Christiansen TC, Krasheninnikoff M. Occupational therapy and Colles' fractures. Int Orthop. 2001;25(1):43-5. doi: 10.1007/s002640000183.

    PubMed 11374267
  • Ezzat A, Baliga S, Carnegie C, Johnstone A. Volar locking plate fixation for distal radius fractures: Does age affect outcome? J Orthop. 2016 Feb 22;13(2):76-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2016.01.001. eCollection 2016 Jun.

    PubMed 27053837
  • Mattila VM, Huttunen TT, Sillanpaa P, Niemi S, Pihlajamaki H, Kannus P. Significant change in the surgical treatment of distal radius fractures: a nationwide study between 1998 and 2008 in Finland. J Trauma. 2011 Oct;71(4):939-42; discussion 942-3. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182231af9.

    PubMed 21986738
  • Al Khudairy A, Hirpara KM, Kelly IP, Quinlan JF. Conservative treatment of the distal radius fracture using thermoplastic splint: pilot study results. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2013 Aug;23(6):647-50. doi: 10.1007/s00590-012-1042-8. Epub 2012 Jul 14.

    PubMed 23412175
  • Jerrhag D, Englund M, Karlsson MK, Rosengren BE. Epidemiology and time trends of distal forearm fractures in adults - a study of 11.2 million person-years in Sweden. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Jun 2;18(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1596-z.

    PubMed 28576135
  • Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review. Injury. 2006 Aug;37(8):691-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.130. Epub 2006 Jun 30.

    PubMed 16814787

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Standard hand therapy + home digital application-based exercises and standard hand therapy + home paper-based exercises in people with Distal Radius Fracture, run by Hôpital Fribourgeois at 1 site in Switzerland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Apr 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Daniel DE Estoppey (0041 26 306 27 90, daniel.estoppey@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Range of motion in flexion-extension (time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06005857, which also lists 14 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Apr 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in