Respiratory Distress Syndrome, NewbornPhase 4PreProMISeNCT06007547
Prophylactic Minimally Invasive Surfactant Evaluation
A Phase 4 study testing Poractant Alfa in people with Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn and Premature Birth, run by Endeavor Health at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to explore the question: Does prophylactic administration of exogenous surfactant in the delivery room, using a minimally-invasive technique, improve outcome in preterm infants 22-29 weeks' gestation compared to rescue treatment using the same technique? Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 15 minutesHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn, Premature Birth
- What is being tested?
- Poractant Alfa
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2024to 31 Jul 2027
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 15 minutes
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Gestational age <30 weeks
- Antenatal consent from Parent
Who cannot join
- Congenital anomalies
- Alternate cause of respiratory distress
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Northshore University Healthsystem
Evanston, Illinois, 60201
Matthew Derrick, mbbs, 847-570-2920, mderrick@northshore.org
About this study
The purpose of this study is to explore the question: Does prophylactic administration of exogenous surfactant in the delivery room, using a minimally-invasive technique, improve outcome in preterm infants 22-29 weeks' gestation compared to rescue treatment using the same technique?
Read the detailed description
RESEARCH DESIGN Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.
Northshore Evanston Hospital will be the primary site. It is hoped that Northwest Community, University of Chicago, Edwards Hospital, Advocate Park Ridge, Advocate Oak Lawn and Advocate Illinois Masonic will also join the study.
RECRUITMENT Entry criteria Inborn preterm infants 22 0/7-29 6/7 weeks' gestation, with be randomized to prophylactic Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy (MIST) in the delivery room compared to rescue MIST if fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ≥0.30 at less than 48 hours of age. Babies in both groups will be managed on nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) pressures of 5-8 cm water.
Exclusion criteria Infants will be excluded if there is a congenital anomaly or an alternative cause for respiratory distress.
Babies who require emergent intubation in the delivery room will not be enrolled in the interventions.
Parental Consent will be obtained prior to birth. Once delivery is imminent infant will be randomized to immediate versus rescue surfactant administration via MIST. Randomization will be in blocks of 6 and using cards with created by a web based randomizer.
Infants who require emergent intubation in the delivery room will not be enrolled in the interventions but their clinical outcomes will be assessed the same as the babies who receive the intervention.
There will be three gestational age strata (22-23 weeks, 24-26 weeks and 27-29 weeks). Twins and higher order multiples will be randomized independently. Babies in the lowest gestational age strata will not be enrolled at a center until 5 babies at that center have been enrolled in either of the other groups.
INTERVENTION Infants randomized to prophylactic surfactant treatment will receive a dose of poractant alfa (Curosurf) administered under direct laryngoscopy using a surfactant instillation catheter (MIST) 16 Gauge Angiocath (Becton Dickinson, Sandy, UT, USA), at a dosage of 200 mg/kg as soon as possible after delivery (within 15 minutes). The infants will be stabilized and placed on NCPAP or High flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC).
Briefly the MIST procedure is as follows: the angiocath is inserted to an appropriate depth under direct laryngoscopy, the laryngoscope is removed, a carbon dioxide (CO2) detector is placed on the end of the catheter with a endotracheal tube adaptor. If the color changes then adaptor and detector are removed and the surfactant is instilled over about 1 minute and the catheter is removed. The infant is maintained on NCPAP/HFNC during the procedure.
Infants of both groups will be supported via HFNC or NCPAP in the delivery room and then transitioned to NCPAP in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).
The control group will be given surfactant via MIST if their fiO2 reaches a threshold of ≥30% within the first 48 hours of life.
A second dose of poractant alfa (Curosurf), at a dosage of 100mg/kg, will be administered via MIST to both groups if their fiO2 reaches the threshold of 30% between 6 and 48 hours after the first dose.
No further surfactant should be given in the first 7 days unless the infant reaches the intubation criteria.
POST-INTERVENTION MANAGEMENT Other than the requirement to adhere to intubation criteria in the first week, and in some cases perform a room air trial at 36 weeks corrected gestation, management will be at the discretion of the clinical team.
Titration of CPAP pressure is encouraged, with a permitted maximum of 8 cm H2O. Use of nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (NIPPV) is allowable for apnea, but discouraged for Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) and should only be after at least one dose of surfactant has been given.
Early caffeine therapy is expected.
Criteria for intubation:
Enrolled infants on CPAP will be intubated if:
- FiO2 ≥0.45 for 15 minutes, or if there is unremitting apnea (> 6 episodes/hour requiring intervention or in the opinion of the treating physician) or persistent respiratory acidosis (pH<7.25 and partial pressure of carbon dioxide (pCO2) >60) on blood gasses at least 30 minutes apart or metabolic acidosis refractory to treatment.
- Need for an anesthetic or an intervention requiring intubation
These criteria apply during the first week of life, and to the first episode of intubation only. If the infant is intubated it is expected that another dose of surfactant will be administered.
OUTCOMES Primary outcome: Intubation in the first 7 days of age.
Secondary outcomes:
- Respiratory Incidence of composite outcome of death or physiological bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Durations of mechanical respiratory support, CPAP, high flow nasal cannula, (HFNC), oxygen therapy. Pneumothorax or pulmonary hemorrhage.
- Non respiratory neonatal morbidities intraventricular hemorrhage, periventricular leukomalacia, retinopathy of prematurity, necrotizing enterocolitis, and patent ductus arteriosus. Corrected age at discharge, length of hospital stay (a proxy for cost). Neonatal follow up data.
The above data will be collected until discharge. Babies born between 22 and 29 weeks are routinely followed by our developmental follow up clinic. The information from the 2-year developmental clinic visit will be recorded by the study.
SAMPLE SIZE 200, 50 being from NorthShore. Between 2018 and 2022 65% of the babies in this gestational age had an endotracheal tube inserted at Evanston Hospital, and were ventilated. Detection of a reduction of 25% (from 65% to 40%) with a 90% power and α = 0.05 (two-sided) would require 82 subjects per arm. It is anticipated that patient recruitment should take 2 years.
- Being tested
- Poractant Alfa
- Keywords
- Respiratory Distress Syndrome, surfactant, Minimally invasive Surfactant Therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn, Premature Birth, Respiratory Distress Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Poractant AlfaDrug
Also called Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy
Poractant alfa (Curosurf) 200mg/kg administered under direct laryngoscopy using a surfactant instillation catheter
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Prophylactic Surfactant via Minimally Invasive Technique | Experimental | Infants randomized to prophylactic surfactant treatment will receive a dose of poractant alfa (Curosurf) administered under direct laryngoscopy using a surfactant instillation catheter (MIST) 16G Angiocath (Becton Dickinson, Sandy, UT, USA), at a dosage of 200 mg/kg as soon as possible after delivery (within 15 minutes). Receives: Drug: Poractant Alfa |
| Rescue Surfactant via Minimally Invasive Technique | Active comparator | The control group will be given surfactant will receive a dose of poractant alfa (Curosurf) administered under direct laryngoscopy using a surfactant instillation catheter (MIST) 16G Angiocath (Becton Dickinson, Sandy, UT, USA), at a dosage of 200 mg/kg if their fiO2 reaches a threshold of ≥30% within the first 48 hours of life. Receives: Drug: Poractant Alfa |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Endotracheal Intubation
Oxygen requirement > 45% requiring endotracheal intubation
Measured: 7 days
Secondary outcomes (1)
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia
Oxygen requirement to 36 weeks corrected age
Measured: 36 weeks corrected gestational age
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Aug 2023
- Study start1 Jan 2024
- Primary completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Jul 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Respiratory Distress Syndrome, NewbornStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Comparison of prophylaxis compared to rescue surfactant, administered using a minimally invasive technique, in premature infants less that 30 weeks gestation
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Endeavor Health
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Chiesi USA, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Matthew Derrick, Endeavor Health
- Investigators
- Matthew Derrick, MBBS, Principal investigator, Northshore Univ Healthsystem
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06007547
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EH23-107
- Acronym
- PreProMISe
- Status last verified
- Aug 2025
- First submitted
- 27 Jul 2023
- Last updated
- 7 Aug 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Dargaville PA, Kamlin COF, Orsini F, Wang X, De Paoli AG, Kanmaz Kutman HG, Cetinkaya M, Kornhauser-Cerar L, Derrick M, Ozkan H, Hulzebos CV, Schmolzer GM, Aiyappan A, Lemyre B, Kuo S, Rajadurai VS, O'Shea J, Biniwale M, Ramanathan R, Kushnir A, Bader D, Thomas MR, Chakraborty M, Buksh MJ, Bhatia R, Sullivan CL, Shinwell ES, Dyson A, Barker DP, Kugelman A, Donovan TJ, Tauscher MK, Murthy V, Ali SKM, Yossuck P, Clark HW, Soll RF, Carlin JB, Davis PG; OPTIMIST-A Trial Investigators. Effect of Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy vs Sham Treatment on Death or Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Preterm Infants With Respiratory Distress Syndrome: The OPTIMIST-A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2021 Dec 28;326(24):2478-2487. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.21892.
PubMed 34902013Kendig JW, Notter RH, Cox C, Reubens LJ, Davis JM, Maniscalco WM, Sinkin RA, Bartoletti A, Dweck HS, Horgan MJ, et al. A comparison of surfactant as immediate prophylaxis and as rescue therapy in newborns of less than 30 weeks' gestation. N Engl J Med. 1991 Mar 28;324(13):865-71. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199103283241301.
PubMed 2000109Kribs A, Hartel C, Kattner E, Vochem M, Kuster H, Moller J, Muller D, Segerer H, Wieg C, Gebauer C, Nikischin W, Wense Av, Herting E, Roth B, Gopel W. Surfactant without intubation in preterm infants with respiratory distress: first multi-center data. Klin Padiatr. 2010 Jan-Feb;222(1):13-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1241867. Epub 2010 Jan 18.
PubMed 20084586Kattwinkel J, Bloom BT, Delmore P, Davis CL, Farrell E, Friss H, Jung AL, King K, Mueller D. Prophylactic administration of calf lung surfactant extract is more effective than early treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in neonates of 29 through 32 weeks' gestation. Pediatrics. 1993 Jul;92(1):90-8.
PubMed 8516091SUPPORT Study Group of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD Neonatal Research Network; Finer NN, Carlo WA, Walsh MC, Rich W, Gantz MG, Laptook AR, Yoder BA, Faix RG, Das A, Poole WK, Donovan EF, Newman NS, Ambalavanan N, Frantz ID 3rd, Buchter S, Sanchez PJ, Kennedy KA, Laroia N, Poindexter BB, Cotten CM, Van Meurs KP, Duara S, Narendran V, Sood BG, O'Shea TM, Bell EF, Bhandari V, Watterberg KL, Higgins RD. Early CPAP versus surfactant in extremely preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2010 May 27;362(21):1970-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0911783. Epub 2010 May 16.
PubMed 20472939
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Aug 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prophylactic Minimally Invasive Surfactant Evaluation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06007547
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PreProMISe / EH23-107
- Keywords
- Respiratory Distress Syndrome, surfactant, Minimally invasive Surfactant Therapy
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Endeavor HealthUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Chiesi USA, Inc.
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Jul 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 23 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to explore the question: Does prophylactic administration of exogenous surfactant in the delivery room, using a minimally-invasive technique, improve outcome in preterm infants 22-29 weeks' gestation compared to rescue treatment using the same technique?
Detailed description
RESEARCH DESIGN Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.
Northshore Evanston Hospital will be the primary site. It is hoped that Northwest Community, University of Chicago, Edwards Hospital, Advocate Park Ridge, Advocate Oak Lawn and Advocate Illinois Masonic will also join the study.
RECRUITMENT Entry criteria Inborn preterm infants 22 0/7-29 6/7 weeks' gestation, with be randomized to prophylactic Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy (MIST) in the delivery room compared to rescue MIST if fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ≥0.30 at less than 48 hours of age. Babies in both groups will be managed on nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) pressures of 5-8 cm water.
Exclusion criteria Infants will be excluded if there is a congenital anomaly or an alternative cause for respiratory distress.
Babies who require emergent intubation in the delivery room will not be enrolled in the interventions.
Parental Consent will be obtained prior to birth. Once delivery is imminent infant will be randomized to immediate versus rescue surfactant administration via MIST. Randomization will be in blocks of 6 and using cards with created by a web based randomizer.
Infants who require emergent intubation in the delivery room will not be enrolled in the interventions but their clinical outcomes will be assessed the same as the babies who receive the intervention.
There will be three gestational age strata (22-23 weeks, 24-26 weeks and 27-29 weeks). Twins and higher order multiples will be randomized independently. Babies in the lowest gestational age strata will not be enrolled at a center until 5 babies at that center have been enrolled in either of the other groups.
INTERVENTION Infants randomized to prophylactic surfactant treatment will receive a dose of poractant alfa (Curosurf) administered under direct laryngoscopy using a surfactant instillation catheter (MIST) 16 Gauge Angiocath (Becton Dickinson, Sandy, UT, USA), at a dosage of 200 mg/kg as soon as possible after delivery (within 15 minutes). The infants will be stabilized and placed on NCPAP or High flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC).
Briefly the MIST procedure is as follows: the angiocath is inserted to an appropriate depth under direct laryngoscopy, the laryngoscope is removed, a carbon dioxide (CO2) detector is placed on the end of the catheter with a endotracheal tube adaptor. If the color changes then adaptor and detector are removed and the surfactant is instilled over about 1 minute and the catheter is removed. The infant is maintained on NCPAP/HFNC during the procedure.
Infants of both groups will be supported via HFNC or NCPAP in the delivery room and then transitioned to NCPAP in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).
The control group will be given surfactant via MIST if their fiO2 reaches a threshold of ≥30% within the first 48 hours of life.
A second dose of poractant alfa (Curosurf), at a dosage of 100mg/kg, will be administered via MIST to both groups if their fiO2 reaches the threshold of 30% between 6 and 48 hours after the first dose.
No further surfactant should be given in the first 7 days unless the infant reaches the intubation criteria.
POST-INTERVENTION MANAGEMENT Other than the requirement to adhere to intubation criteria in the first week, and in some cases perform a room air trial at 36 weeks corrected gestation, management will be at the discretion of the clinical team.
Titration of CPAP pressure is encouraged, with a permitted maximum of 8 cm H2O. Use of nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (NIPPV) is allowable for apnea, but discouraged for Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) and should only be after at least one dose of surfactant has been given.
Early caffeine therapy is expected.
Criteria for intubation:
Enrolled infants on CPAP will be intubated if:
- FiO2 ≥0.45 for 15 minutes, or if there is unremitting apnea (> 6 episodes/hour requiring intervention or in the opinion of the treating physician) or persistent respiratory acidosis (pH<7.25 and partial pressure of carbon dioxide (pCO2) >60) on blood gasses at least 30 minutes apart or metabolic acidosis refractory to treatment.
- Need for an anesthetic or an intervention requiring intubation
These criteria apply during the first week of life, and to the first episode of intubation only. If the infant is intubated it is expected that another dose of surfactant will be administered.
OUTCOMES Primary outcome: Intubation in the first 7 days of age.
Secondary outcomes:
- Respiratory Incidence of composite outcome of death or physiological bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Durations of mechanical respiratory support, CPAP, high flow nasal cannula, (HFNC), oxygen therapy. Pneumothorax or pulmonary hemorrhage.
- Non respiratory neonatal morbidities intraventricular hemorrhage, periventricular leukomalacia, retinopathy of prematurity, necrotizing enterocolitis, and patent ductus arteriosus. Corrected age at discharge, length of hospital stay (a proxy for cost). Neonatal follow up data.
The above data will be collected until discharge. Babies born between 22 and 29 weeks are routinely followed by our developmental follow up clinic. The information from the 2-year developmental clinic visit will be recorded by the study.
SAMPLE SIZE 200, 50 being from NorthShore. Between 2018 and 2022 65% of the babies in this gestational age had an endotracheal tube inserted at Evanston Hospital, and were ventilated. Detection of a reduction of 25% (from 65% to 40%) with a 90% power and α = 0.05 (two-sided) would require 82 subjects per arm. It is anticipated that patient recruitment should take 2 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Comparison of prophylaxis compared to rescue surfactant, administered using a minimally invasive technique, in premature infants less that 30 weeks gestation
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Prophylactic Surfactant via Minimally Invasive Technique | Experimental | Drug: Poractant AlfaInfants randomized to prophylactic surfactant treatment will receive a dose of poractant alfa (Curosurf) administered under direct laryngoscopy using a surfactant instillation catheter (MIST) 16G Angiocath (Becton Dickinson, Sandy, UT, USA), at a dosage of 200 mg/kg as soon as possible after delivery (within 15 minutes). |
| Rescue Surfactant via Minimally Invasive Technique | Active comparator | Drug: Poractant AlfaThe control group will be given surfactant will receive a dose of poractant alfa (Curosurf) administered under direct laryngoscopy using a surfactant instillation catheter (MIST) 16G Angiocath (Becton Dickinson, Sandy, UT, USA), at a dosage of 200 mg/kg if their fiO2 reaches a threshold of ≥30% within the first 48 hours of life. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 15 minutes
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Gestational age <30 weeks
- Antenatal consent from Parent
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Congenital anomalies
- Alternate cause of respiratory distress
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Poractant AlfaAlso: Minimally Invasive Surfactant TherapyPoractant alfa (Curosurf) 200mg/kg administered under direct laryngoscopy using a surfactant instillation catheter | Drug | Prophylactic Surfactant via Minimally Invasive Technique, Rescue Surfactant via Minimally Invasive Technique |
Primary outcome
Endotracheal Intubation
Time frame: 7 days
Oxygen requirement > 45% requiring endotracheal intubation
1 secondary outcome
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia
Time frame: 36 weeks corrected gestational age
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Aug 2025.
- Background: PubMed 34902013Dargaville PA, Kamlin COF, Orsini F, Wang X, De Paoli AG, Kanmaz Kutman HG, Cetinkaya M, Kornhauser-Cerar L, Derrick M, Ozkan H, Hulzebos CV, Schmolzer GM, Aiyappan A, Lemyre B, Kuo S, Rajadurai VS, O'Shea J, Biniwale M, Ramanathan R, Kushnir A, Bader D, Thomas MR, Chakraborty M, Buksh MJ, Bhatia R, Sullivan CL, Shinwell ES, Dyson A, Barker DP, Kugelman A, Donovan TJ, Tauscher MK, Murthy V, Ali SKM, Yossuck P, Clark HW, Soll RF, Carlin JB, Davis PG; OPTIMIST-A Trial Investigators. Effect of Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy vs Sham Treatment on Death or Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Preterm Infants With Respiratory Distress Syndrome: The OPTIMIST-A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2021 Dec 28;326(24):2478-2487. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.21892.
- Background: PubMed 2000109Kendig JW, Notter RH, Cox C, Reubens LJ, Davis JM, Maniscalco WM, Sinkin RA, Bartoletti A, Dweck HS, Horgan MJ, et al. A comparison of surfactant as immediate prophylaxis and as rescue therapy in newborns of less than 30 weeks' gestation. N Engl J Med. 1991 Mar 28;324(13):865-71. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199103283241301.
- Background: PubMed 20084586Kribs A, Hartel C, Kattner E, Vochem M, Kuster H, Moller J, Muller D, Segerer H, Wieg C, Gebauer C, Nikischin W, Wense Av, Herting E, Roth B, Gopel W. Surfactant without intubation in preterm infants with respiratory distress: first multi-center data. Klin Padiatr. 2010 Jan-Feb;222(1):13-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1241867. Epub 2010 Jan 18.
- Background: PubMed 8516091Kattwinkel J, Bloom BT, Delmore P, Davis CL, Farrell E, Friss H, Jung AL, King K, Mueller D. Prophylactic administration of calf lung surfactant extract is more effective than early treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in neonates of 29 through 32 weeks' gestation. Pediatrics. 1993 Jul;92(1):90-8.
- Background: PubMed 20472939SUPPORT Study Group of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD Neonatal Research Network; Finer NN, Carlo WA, Walsh MC, Rich W, Gantz MG, Laptook AR, Yoder BA, Faix RG, Das A, Poole WK, Donovan EF, Newman NS, Ambalavanan N, Frantz ID 3rd, Buchter S, Sanchez PJ, Kennedy KA, Laroia N, Poindexter BB, Cotten CM, Van Meurs KP, Duara S, Narendran V, Sood BG, O'Shea TM, Bell EF, Bhandari V, Watterberg KL, Higgins RD. Early CPAP versus surfactant in extremely preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2010 May 27;362(21):1970-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0911783. Epub 2010 May 16.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Development and Prospective Validation of the AutoEIT Foundation Model for ARDS
ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome), Respiratory Failure
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Fostamatinib for Treating Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) in Hospitalized Adults
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, ARDS
Not yet recruiting
The Hemodynamic Impact of High-frequency Oscillatory Ventilation and Periodic Sighs in Preterm Infants
Preterm, Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Premature Infant
Recruiting
Ventilator Pressure and Optimization of Compliance and Hemodynamics
Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia, Pulmonary Hypertension Due to Lung Diseases and Hypoxia
RecruitingObservational study
Pulmonary Immune Cell-microbiome Interactions in ARDS
ARDS, Human
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Matthew Derrick, MBBS principal investigator
Northshore Univ Healthsystem
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Poractant Alfa in people with Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn and Premature Birth, run by Endeavor Health at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Matthew Derrick, MBBS (8475702920, mderrick@northshore.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Endotracheal Intubation (time frame: 7 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06007547, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Aug 2025.