AzTrials
AzTrials

Coronary Artery DiseaseGUIDEX®_FRNCT06009757

GUIDEX® Versus Launcher™ Guiding Catheter in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) (GUIDEX_FR)

A study testing GUIDEX® guiding catheter and Launcher™ coronary guide catheter in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Tianjin Demax Medical Technology Co., Ltd at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two guiding catheters in patients with coronary artery disease during a percutaneous coronary intervention between Guidex® Guiding catheter (DEMAX) and Launcher™ coronary guide catheters (Medtronic). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Coronary Artery Disease
What is being tested?
GUIDEX® guiding catheter and Launcher™ coronary guide catheter
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
150 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
10 Apr 2025to 6 Jan 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients need to be at least 18 years old.
  • Patients with significant coronary artery disease who qualify for PCI (according to ACC/AHA/SCAI 2021 guidelines, including that the patient has received medical therapy with exercise and dietary recommendations before or at the same time as the PCI decision and that the clinical decision depends on the cardiology team) and who can be treated with a radial and femoral approach
  • Patients scheduled for for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and must remain overnight for observation
  • The target vessel must have a TIMI flow 3 at baseline
  • Palpable radial or fermoral artery
  • Patients covered by the social security system

Who cannot join

  • Concomitant use of Atherectomy, specialty balloon (intravascular lithotripsy), or investigational coronary devices (intravascular ultrasound, or optical coherence tomography)
  • Active bleeding or significant increased risk of bleeding, severe hepatic insufficiency, current peptic ulceration, proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
  • Prior PCI procedure within the last 30 days of the index procedure
  • Current platelet count <100 x 10^9cells/L or Hgb <10 g/dL.
  • Uncontrolled severe hypertension (systolic BP >180 mm Hg or diastolic BP >110 mm Hg)
  • Target vessel < 2.4 mm in diameter
Show all 16Show fewer
  • Target lesion > 32 mm in length
  • Patient has allergy to imaging contrast media for which they cannot be pre-medicated
  • Patients with hypersensitivity or contraindication to antiplatelet treatment
  • Patient unable to stop his or her daily oral medication includes metformin treatment during 48 hours.
  • Unstable patient: myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock or with troponin above the upper limit of the normal laboratory value in the 24 hours prior to the procedure OR with elevated troponin and abnormal concomitant CK (non-exhaustive list).
  • Unable to follow the requirements of the protocol.
  • Vulnerable: whose ability or freedom to give or refuse consent is limited.
  • Patients who cannot read or write french;
  • Major protected by law (tutorship, curatorship, safeguarding justice...).
  • Patient is pregnant or nursing

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • CHU Toulouse

    Toulouse, 31300

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Safety and Efficacy of the GUIDEX® Versus Launcher™ Guiding Catheter in Adults' Patients With Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Requiring Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI): a Non-inferiority and Randomized, Clinical Trial.

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two guiding catheters in patients with coronary artery disease during a percutaneous coronary intervention between Guidex® Guiding catheter (DEMAX) and Launcher™ coronary guide catheters (Medtronic). The main question[s] it aims to answer are:

  • Aren't the safety of medical devices inferior to each other?
  • Aren't the efficacyof medical devices inferior to each other? Participants will be randomized (1:1) and have a percutaneous coronary interventionwith one of the two guiding catheters.
Read the detailed description

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the most common cause of death in the European region. In line with the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) estimates from 2001, 43% of all Cardio Vascular Disease (CVD) deaths are related to coronary artery disease (CAD).

Treatment of CAD is always based on medication, which may also be supplemented by invasive procedures. The most significant historical advances in the treatment of coronary artery disease were the development of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

An essential element in the success of an angioplasty and in shortening the procedure, the guiding catheter is not simply a support. While, it's primary role is designed to provide a pathway through which balloon dilation catheter, guide wire or other devices are introduced, it can also contribute to significant semantic information since it is the first tool to appear in the field of view. A variety of guiding catheter references are available on the market.

Guiding catheters of various sizes and shapes are selected based on vessel anatomy, lesion characteristics, vascular access and procedural complexity.

The GUIDEX® device is a guiding catheter designed to be used in percutaneous coronary intervention. GUIDEX® device is on the Chinese market since September 2015 (certificate renewal in 2020) and is presented for CE marking according to MDR 2017/745.

The aim of the study is to assess the essential requirements for CE marking of Guidex®: the efficacy and safety of the device. Thus the aim of this non-inferiority study is to compare the efficacy and safety for patients with coronary artery disease during a percutaneous coronary intervention between Guidex® Guiding catheter (DEMAX) and Launcher™ coronary guide catheters (Medtronic).

Being tested
GUIDEX® guiding catheter, Launcher™ coronary guide catheter
Keywords
Percutaneous coronary intervention, Guiding catheter
Medical subject headings
Coronary Artery Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • GUIDEX® guiding catheterDevice

    The main steps of the procedure Percutaneous Coronary Intervention are :

    • The patient should prepare for angioplasty using standard techniques. Appropriate anticoagulation and vasodilation therapy should be administered.
    • The Guiding Catheter must be introduced into the vascular system by cut-down or percutaneous techniques.
    • The guiding catheter will be introduce over a previously placed standard angiographic wire. It will be aspirate and flush after the removal of the angiographic wire following established angiographic technique.
    • The catheter should should address the selected vascular site
    • The guiding catheter will be removing. The procedure is performed in a healthcare facility, in an operating room under fluoroscopic monitoring. The users are trained practiticoners for PCI.
  • Launcher™ coronary guide catheterDevice

    The main steps of the procedure Percutaneous Coronary Intervention are :

    • The patient should prepare for angioplasty using standard techniques. Appropriate anticoagulation and vasodilation therapy should be administered.
    • The Guiding Catheter must be introduced into the vascular system by cut-down or percutaneous techniques.
    • The guiding catheter will be introduce over a previously placed standard angiographic wire. It will be aspirate and flush after the removal of the angiographic wire following established angiographic technique.
    • The catheter should should address the selected vascular site
    • The guiding catheter will be removing. The procedure is performed in a healthcare facility, in an operating room under fluoroscopic monitoring. The users are trained practiticoners for PCI.
Study groups in NCT06009757
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Guiding Catheter GUIDEXExperimentalPatients with coronary artery disease during a percutaneous coronary intervention will be treated with one of the guiding catheter
Receives: Device: GUIDEX® guiding catheter
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Guiding Catheter MedtronicsExperimentalPatients with coronary artery disease during a percutaneous coronary intervention will be treated with one of the guiding catheter
Receives: Device: Launcher™ coronary guide catheter

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The primary outcome is the frequency of in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE)

    Analyze the frequency of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) during the procedure. MACE was defined as the following:

    • Cardiac death
    • Myocardial infarction - defined as a CK-MB level > 3 times the upper limit of lab normal (ULN) value with or without new pathologic Q wave
    • TVR - defined as revascularization at the target vessel (inclusive of the target lesion) after the completion of the index procedure

    Measured: Baseline until the end of the procedure

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Percentage of subjects achieving angiographic with sucess

    The percentage of subjects achieving angiographic success were defined as success in facilating delivery of the balloon dilation catheter, guidewire or other devices introduced in the coronary arteries, using the medical devices with <50% residual stenosis without serious angiographic complications. Serious angiographic complications defined as severe dissection (Type D to F - To confirm ), perforation, abrupt closure, and persistent slow flow or persistent no reflow.

    Measured: Baseline until End of the procedure

  2. Time used for the procedure (in minutes) .

    Time (in minutes) between the start of the procedure until the end of the procedure

    Measured: Baseline until end of the procedure (Day 1)

  3. Frequency of in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE). MACE was defined as the following: a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization.

    Analyze the frequency of in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE). MACE was defined as the following:

    • Cardiac death
    • Myocardial infarction - defined as a CK-MB level > 3 times the upper limit of lab normal (ULN) value with or without new pathologic Q wave
    • TVR - defined as revascularization at the target vessel (inclusive of the target lesion) after the completion of the index procedure

    Measured: Baseline until discharge from the hospital (Day 2)

  4. Incidence of complication and adverse event rates

    Incidence of adverse event during 1 month after the PCI (in particular related to the potential adverse event at the puncture site).

    Measured: [Time frame; to the baseline up to 30 days after the procedure)

  5. Frequency of access-site-related complications.

    The frequency of access-site related complications is defined as bleeding, pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, and occlusion of the radial artery), which were considered to be major if they were associated with a vascular repair or a blood transfusion.

    Measured: Baseline until End of the procedure

  6. Ability to achieve co-axial engagement (in degrees)

    Analyse the level of angulation of the coronary artery (in degrees) during the PCI

    Measured: Baseline until end of the procedure (Day 1)

  7. Assessed as Fluoroscopy time (in sec)

    Assessed as fluoroscopy time (in sec) during the PCI

    Measured: Baseline until end of the procedure (Day 1)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Aug 2023
  2. Study start10 Apr 2025
  3. Primary completion6 Jan 2026
  4. Study completion6 Jan 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Thus the aim of this non-inferiority study is to compare the efficacy and safety for patients with coronary artery disease during a percutaneous coronary intervention between Guidex® Guiding catheter (DEMAX) and Launcher™ coronary guide catheters (Medtronic).
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
150 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06009757
Sponsor's protocol ID
CLI-00910
Acronym
GUIDEX®_FR
Status last verified
Aug 2025
First submitted
28 Jul 2023
Last updated
26 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Nothing

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing GUIDEX® guiding catheter and Launcher™ coronary guide catheter in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Tianjin Demax Medical Technology Co., Ltd at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The primary outcome is the frequency of in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (time frame: Baseline until the end of the procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Aug 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in