HysterectomyWISHNCT06011538
Web-based Versus Standard Information for Same Day Hysterectomy (WISH)
A study testing On-line, multi-media information on a specifically designed website for Same Day Discharge following Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in people with Hysterectomy and LAP, run by Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust.
Trial summary
Objectives: To evaluate the potential utility and efficacy of additional on-line, patient education resource for same day discharge following laparoscopic hysterectomy (SDD LH) compared to standard information resources alone Trial Design: A pilot, parallel, open, single centre, randomised controlled trial Participant… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Hysterectomy, LAP
- What is being tested?
- On-line, multi-media information on a specifically designed website for Same Day Discharge following Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Sep 2023to Mar 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Able to give informed consent to participate
- Have a benign gynaecological condition that is being treated with a LH
- Eligible to be on same day discharge pathway Patient factors
- ASA I/II with no sleep apnoea. ASA III may be suitable if comorbidities are stable and optimised.
- No known cardio-pulmonary compromise
- No known renal disease
Show all 15Show fewer
- Age </= 60 years
- BMI </=40
- Not indication for admission to Gynaecological Extended Recovery Area (GERU)
- Surgical factors
- Presumed benign disease
- No anticipated surgical complications
- Concomitant procedures acceptable but surgeon to decide on a case by case basis Discharge factors
- Residence < 1 hour from BWCH
- Access to transport from hospital to home
Who cannot join
- Patient above the age of 60
- Unwillingness or inability to comply with protocol procedures
- Women who require concomitant gynaecological surgery for bladder or other pelvic support
- Women who require concomitant gynaecological surgery for excision of deep endometriosis that requires dissection of the pararectal space above the age of 60
- Unwillingness or inability to comply with protocol procedures
- Women who require concomitant gynaecological surgery for bladder or other pelvic support
- Women who require concomitant gynaecological surgery for excision of deep endometriosis that requires dissection of the pararectal space
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
Paul Smith, MD, MRCOG contact
About this study
Official title: The WISH Trial (Web-based Versus Standard Information for Same Day Hysterectomy)
Objectives: To evaluate the potential utility and efficacy of additional on-line, patient education resource for same day discharge following laparoscopic hysterectomy (SDD LH) compared to standard information resources alone
Trial Design: A pilot, parallel, open, single centre, randomised controlled trial
Read more
Participant Population and Sample Size: 40 women undergoing SDD LH for a benign reason
Eligibility Criteria: Women with gynaecological conditions requiring a laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) and who are suitable for same day discharge (SDD).
Interventions: An online patient education website resource and the comparator is standard practice for provision of patient information (written and verbal).
Outcome Measures:
Primary
- Compliance with SDD Secondary
- In Hospital:
- Surgical details / complexity / intraoperative and post-operative serious adverse events (SAEs) according to the Clavien-Dindo system grade II-IV which is a widely used index for the classification of surgical complications [case notes and electronic patient record], and time to discharge
- 6 weeks:
- Satisfaction, acceptability and utility of patient education / information provided (bespoke patient questionnaire; Likert scales)
- Satisfaction with care after LH (6-point Likert)
- Generic quality of life at 6 weeks post-surgery (EuroQol-5D-5L and VAS);
- Contact with Community \& Clinical Care Services i.e. outpatients or emergency visits, re-presentations / re-admissions to hospital (Case report form [CRF], case notes, electronic patient record)
- Serious Adverse Events (CRF, case notes, electronic patient record)
- Time from surgery to resumption of usual activities using the PROMIS-SF (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function) questionnaire (Modified items / response categories)
- 12 weeks:
- Time from surgery to resumption of usual activities using the PROMIS-SF (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function) questionnaire (Modified items / response categories) Time to return to work (if working)
Read the detailed description
Aim:
To evaluate the potential efficacy of additional on-line, patient education for SDD LH in achieving SDD compared to standard information giving. In addition, the utility and acceptability of patient information will be assessed as well as the impact on patient satisfaction and recovery.
Objectives:
The investigators aim to assess various aspects of trial management and design. In order to achieve this, the objectives of the pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) will be split into:
- Process Objectives
- To determine the proportion of eligible women that are screened and meet the inclusion criteria
- To determine the proportion of eligible women that agree to be randomised
- To determine the robustness of proposed data collection tools; completion and return rates
- Clinical Objectives
- To determine the appropriateness of the outcome measures
- To derive clinical data to help inform the sample size for a future substantive study (the potential efficacy of additional on-line, patient education for SDD LH in achieving SDD compared to standard information giving).
Trial design and setting
Trial design:
A pilot, parallel, open, single centre, randomised controlled trial.
Trial Setting:
Recruitment to the Web-based Versus Standard Information for Same Day Hysterectomy (WISH) study will take place in gynaecology departments (general and relevant specialist clinics including menstrual disorders and pelvic pain clinics, hysteroscopy and colposcopy services) in an NHS, University-affiliated Teaching Hospital (Birmingham Women's \& Children's Hospital (BWCH) in the UK.
Identification of participants:
Eligible women will be identified by a member of the clinical team responsible for the direct care of the potential participant in outpatient gynaecology clinics and pre-operative assessment clinics in each recruiting centre. Additionally, patients already on the waiting list for SDD LH will be identified and invited to participate. The study will be introduced by a member of the clinical or research team, with full counselling about the trial. The potential participant will be advised that participation in the study is entirely voluntary with the option of withdrawing from the study at any stage. It will be made clear that participation or non-participation will not affect their usual care.
Assessment of Risk:
SDD LH is routinely practiced at the BWCH. Verbal and written, paper-based information is provided. This study provides additional, on-line, multi-media information on a specifically designed website for SDD LH. Thus, this trial is categorised as: Type A = No higher than the risk of standard medical care.
Eligibility
Women are eligible for recruitment if they meet the inclusion criteria and do not have any of the exclusion criteria set out below:
Inclusion Criteria:
- Able to give informed consent to participate
- Have a benign gynaecological condition that is being treated with a LH
- Eligible to be on same day discharge pathway Patient factors
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification I/II with no sleep apnoea. ASA III may be suitable if comorbidities are stable and optimised.
- No known cardio-pulmonary compromise
- No known renal disease
- Age </=60 years
- BMI </=40
- Not indication for admission to Gynaecological Extended Recovery Area (GERU) Surgical factors
- Presumed benign disease
- No anticipated surgical complications
- Concomitant procedures acceptable but surgeon to decide on a case by case basis Discharge factors
- Residence < 1 hour from BWCH
- Access to transport from hospital to home
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient above the age of 60
- Unwillingness or inability to comply with protocol procedures
- Women who require concomitant gynaecological surgery for bladder or other pelvic support
- Women who require concomitant gynaecological surgery for excision of deep endometriosis that requires dissection of the pararectal space
Consent
It will be the responsibility of the Investigator to obtain informed consent for each participant prior to performing any trial related procedure. A research nurse, research midwife or clinician is able to take consent providing that local practice allows this and responsibility has been delegated by the Principal Investigator as captured on the Site Signature and Delegation Log.
A Participant Information Sheet (PIS) will be provided to facilitate this process either at the time of initial consultation / hospital visit or sent through the post, via email, or by text as an attachment. Investigators or their delegate(s) will ensure that they adequately explain the aim, trial treatment, anticipated benefits and potential hazards of taking part in the trial to the participant. They will also stress that participation is voluntary and that the participant is free to decline to take part and may withdraw from the trial at any time. The participant will be given sufficient time to read the PIS and to discuss their participation with others outside of the site research team. The participant will be given the opportunity to ask questions. Where direct access to patient medical records is required the participant will give explicit consent for the regulatory authorities, members of the research team and or representatives of the sponsor to be given direct access to their medical records.
The Investigator or their delegate will then countersign and date the informed consent form (ICF). A copy of the ICF will be given to the participant (hard copy), a copy will be filed in the medical notes, and the original placed in the Investigator Site File (ISF). Once the participant is entered into the trial, the participant's trial number will be entered on the ICF maintained in the ISF.
Details of the informed consent discussions will be recorded in the participant's medical notes. This will include date of discussion, the name of the trial, summary of discussion, version number of the PIS given to participant and version number of ICF signed and date consent received. Where consent is obtained on the same day that the trial related assessments are due to start, a note should be made in the medical notes as to what time the consent was obtained and what time the procedures started.
Throughout the trial the participant will have the opportunity to ask questions about the trial. Any new information that may be relevant to the participant's continued participation will be provided. Where new information becomes available which may affect the participants' decision to continue, participants will be given time to consider and if happy to continue will be re-consented. Re-consent will be documented in the medical notes. The participant's right to withdraw from the trial at any time will remain.
Details of all patients approached about the trial will be recorded on the Participant Screening/Enrolment Log.
Recruitment, enrolment and randomisation
Recruitment:
Potential participants will be identified and approached by medical staff who are responsible for the direct care of the potential participant after having received appropriate training relating to the trial and who are delegated this task on the site delegation log. Recruitment will take place in gynaecology clinics in gynaecologist lead centres located across the United Kingdom.
The participant eligibility pathway to recruitment and randomisation is illustrated by the trial schema. Eligibility will be confirmed following discussions with the woman and a review of her medical notes by staff delegated this duty by the local principle investigator (PI).
Potential participants will be advised that taking part in the study is entirely voluntary and they may withdraw from the study at any stage without this affecting their usual care. Potential participants will be provided with a research ethics committee (REC) approved Study Participant Information Sheet (PIS) and given time to consider their involvement. However, as the intervention is simply an additional information resource (web-site link), patients will be allowed to consent during the initial consultation in clinic if they are willing to do so (PPI focus group felt that such an approach is acceptable because most women are comfortable with the internet and postal / phone follow up). However, as postal / phone follow up is required for up to 12 weeks, they will be made aware of this and take as much time as they need to consider participation.
Women who give consent will proceed to randomisation if they are eligible to participate in the trial. Consent will be recorded on the approved consent form, the original of which must be retained in the site file with a copy given to the participant.
Enrolment and Screening:
Women with benign gynaecological conditions requiring a LH and who are suitable for a SDD are eligible for inclusion. Prior to clinical consultations, the medical records of potential participants may be screened for eligibility by clinic doctors, nurses, research nurses and research midwives, after having received appropriate training relating to the trial. Clinic doctors will confirm eligibility for the trial. The same process will be applied to patients on the waiting list for SDD LH to identify eligible patients, contact them and invite them to participate.
Randomisation:
After participant eligibility has been confirmed and informed consent has been received, the participant can be randomised into the trial. Patients will be randomised in a 1:1 manner to either provision of the on-line SDD LH website resource (intervention) or standard practice for information provision (control). Randomisation will be performed via a web-based platform. If allocated to the intervention, then the website link will be provided in writing, via post, email or text (according to the patient's preference) immediately. Investigators will keep their own study file log which links patients with their allocated trial number in the trial Patient Recruitment and Identification Log.
Blinding:
Patients, clinicians, investigators, research assistants and responsible clinicians will not be blinded to the assigned allocation
Trial treatment / Intervention
Patients with a benign condition listed for a SDD LH agreeing to participate in the study who are allocated the intervention will be provided with the link to the SDD LH patient information website (see Table 1 and the website https://www.mydaycasehysterectomy.com). The option of this educational material will be in addition to the standard verbal and written patient information provided by the BWCH. Patients allocated the control group will receive standard BWCH information only.
The decision to remove or retain cervix (total or sub-total) or remove and retain ovaries will be left to the discretion of the participant in consultation with her gynaecologist. The LH will be performed or supervised by a surgeon who has self-declared as having expertise in laparoscopic hysterectomy and this requires the surgeon to meet minimum standards, regarding experience and case-load. Satisfactory experience will require surgeons to have performed a minimum of 30 cases and to have a current caseload of at least 12 cases per year
- Conditions
- Hysterectomy, LAP
- Being tested
- On-line, multi-media information on a specifically designed website for Same Day Discharge following Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
- Keywords
- Same day discharge, Laparoscopic hysterectomy, Educational platform, Enhanced recovery
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
On-line, multi-media information on a specifically designed website for Same Day Discharge following Laparoscopic HysterectomyOther
A patient educational website that provides clear, easily accessible, patient friendly information explaining what SDD after laparoscopic hysterectomy is, why SDD may be beneficial and what to expect from decision for surgery, through to the admission to hospital and immediate, short and long term recovery.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| On-line SDD LH website resource (intervention) | Experimental | Patients allocated the experimental arm will be provided with the link to the SDD LH patient information website (https://www.mydaycasehysterectomy.com).The option of this educational material will be in addition to the standard verbal and written patient information provided by the BWCH. Receives: Other: On-line, multi-media information on a specifically designed website for Same Day Discharge following Laparoscopic Hysterectomy |
| Standard practice for information provision (control) | Active comparator | Patients allocated the control group will receive standard BWCH information only. Receives: Other: On-line, multi-media information on a specifically designed website for Same Day Discharge following Laparoscopic Hysterectomy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Same Day Discharge following laparoscopic hysterectomy (0-23hours)
This means that the patient is discharged (leaves the hospital) before midnight on the day of surgery (case notes / electronic patient record).
Measured: 0-24hours following surgery
Secondary outcomes (9)
Satisfaction with care on discharge (bespoke patient questionnaire score)
Patient satisfaction of same day discharge following laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH). protocol. This will be assessed through bespoke patient questionnaire.
Measured: 0-24hours following surgery
Acceptability and utility of patient education / information provided (score)
Patient satisfaction of acceptability and utility of patient education / information provided. This will be assessed through bespoke patient questionnaire.
Measured: 6 weeks
Satisfaction with clinical outcome after laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) (score)
Patient's satisfaction with clinical outcome after laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) through(5-point Likert)
Measured: 6 weeks
Satisfaction with care on discharge (score)
Patient's satisfaction with care on discharge through bespoke patient questionnaire
Measured: 6 weeks
Generic quality of life post-surgery (score)
Patient's Quality of life score using EuroQol-5D-5L questionnaire
Measured: 6 weeks
Generic quality of life post-surgery (score)
Patient's Quality of life score using EuroQol-5D-5L visual analogue scale
Measured: 6 weeks
Contact with Community & Clinical Care Services
Serious Adverse Events through case report forms (CRF)
Measured: 6 weeks
Time from surgery to resumption of usual activities in days
Time from surgery to resumption of usual activities using the PROMIS-SF (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function) questionnaire (item bank v1.2 will be used). Of the 29 items covering relevant activities for our study population, we have selected 8 items and. The selected items and the response categories were chosen by the PPI focus group to reflect the most common and generally applicable day-to-day activities. Participants will record when each activity is resumed, with full recovery being achieved once all 8 personalised activities have been resumed.
Measured: 6-12 weeks
Time to return to work (if working) in days
This will be assessed using bespoke patient questionnaire
Measured: 6-12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Aug 2023
- Study startSep 2023 (estimated)
- Primary completionDec 2023 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HysterectomyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- To evaluate the potential efficacy of additional on-line, patient education for SDD LH in achieving SDD compared to standard information giving. In addition, the utility and acceptability of patient information will be assessed as well as the impact on patient satisfaction and recovery.
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- TJustin Clark, MD, FRCOG, Principal investigator, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06011538
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BirminghamWCNHSFT
- Acronym
- WISH
- Status last verified
- Aug 2023
- First submitted
- 9 Aug 2023
- Last updated
- 25 Aug 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: IPD will only be shared as part of results in a peer reviewed publication. No specific or individual participant data will be shared
Publications
Lonky NM, Mohan Y, Chiu VY, Park J, Kivnick S, Hong C, Hudson SM. Hysterectomy for benign conditions: Complications relative to surgical approach and other variables that lead to post-operative readmission within 90 days of surgery. Womens Health (Lond). 2017 Aug;13(2):17-26. doi: 10.1177/1745505717714657. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
PubMed 28660800Madhvani K, Curnow T, Carpenter T. Route of hysterectomy: a retrospective, cohort study in English NHS Hospitals from 2011 to 2017. BJOG. 2019 May;126(6):795-802. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15539. Epub 2018 Dec 30.
PubMed 30461181Moawad G, Liu E, Song C, Fu AZ. Movement to outpatient hysterectomy for benign indications in the United States, 2008-2014. PLoS One. 2017 Nov 30;12(11):e0188812. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188812. eCollection 2017.
PubMed 29190666Warren L, Ladapo JA, Borah BJ, Gunnarsson CL. Open abdominal versus laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy: analysis of a large United States payer measuring quality and cost of care. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009 Sep-Oct;16(5):581-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.06.018.
PubMed 19835801Bailey CR, Ahuja M, Bartholomew K, Bew S, Forbes L, Lipp A, Montgomery J, Russon K, Potparic O, Stocker M. Guidelines for day-case surgery 2019: Guidelines from the Association of Anaesthetists and the British Association of Day Surgery. Anaesthesia. 2019 Jun;74(6):778-792. doi: 10.1111/anae.14639. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
PubMed 30963557Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W, Demartines N, Roulin D, Francis N, McNaught CE, MacFie J, Liberman AS, Soop M, Hill A, Kennedy RH, Lobo DN, Fearon K, Ljungqvist O; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society recommendations. Clin Nutr. 2012 Dec;31(6):783-800. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.08.013. Epub 2012 Sep 28.
PubMed 23099039Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibanes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009 Aug;250(2):187-96. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2.
PubMed 19638912Perino A, Cucinella G, Venezia R, Castelli A, Cittadini E. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: an assessment of the learning curve in a prospective randomized study. Hum Reprod. 1999 Dec;14(12):2996-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.12.2996.
PubMed 10601085
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Aug 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The WISH Trial (Web-based Versus Standard Information for Same Day Hysterectomy)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06011538
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- WISH / BirminghamWCNHSFT
- Conditions
- Hysterectomy, LAP
- Keywords
- Same day discharge, Laparoscopic hysterectomy, Educational platform, Enhanced recovery
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation TrustUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2023 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 25 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Objectives: To evaluate the potential utility and efficacy of additional on-line, patient education resource for same day discharge following laparoscopic hysterectomy (SDD LH) compared to standard information resources alone
Trial Design: A pilot, parallel, open, single centre, randomised controlled trial
Participant Population and Sample Size: 40 women undergoing SDD LH for a benign reason
Eligibility Criteria: Women with gynaecological conditions requiring a laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) and who are suitable for same day discharge (SDD).
Interventions: An online patient education website resource and the comparator is standard practice for provision of patient information (written and verbal).
Outcome Measures:
Primary
- Compliance with SDD Secondary
- In Hospital:
- Surgical details / complexity / intraoperative and post-operative serious adverse events (SAEs) according to the Clavien-Dindo system grade II-IV which is a widely used index for the classification of surgical complications [case notes and electronic patient record], and time to discharge
- 6 weeks:
- Satisfaction, acceptability and utility of patient education / information provided (bespoke patient questionnaire; Likert scales)
- Satisfaction with care after LH (6-point Likert)
- Generic quality of life at 6 weeks post-surgery (EuroQol-5D-5L and VAS);
- Contact with Community \& Clinical Care Services i.e. outpatients or emergency visits, re-presentations / re-admissions to hospital (Case report form [CRF], case notes, electronic patient record)
- Serious Adverse Events (CRF, case notes, electronic patient record)
- Time from surgery to resumption of usual activities using the PROMIS-SF (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function) questionnaire (Modified items / response categories)
- 12 weeks:
- Time from surgery to resumption of usual activities using the PROMIS-SF (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function) questionnaire (Modified items / response categories) Time to return to work (if working)
Detailed description
Aim:
To evaluate the potential efficacy of additional on-line, patient education for SDD LH in achieving SDD compared to standard information giving. In addition, the utility and acceptability of patient information will be assessed as well as the impact on patient satisfaction and recovery.
Objectives:
The investigators aim to assess various aspects of trial management and design. In order to achieve this, the objectives of the pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) will be split into:
- Process Objectives
- To determine the proportion of eligible women that are screened and meet the inclusion criteria
- To determine the proportion of eligible women that agree to be randomised
- To determine the robustness of proposed data collection tools; completion and return rates
- Clinical Objectives
- To determine the appropriateness of the outcome measures
- To derive clinical data to help inform the sample size for a future substantive study (the potential efficacy of additional on-line, patient education for SDD LH in achieving SDD compared to standard information giving).
Trial design and setting
Trial design:
A pilot, parallel, open, single centre, randomised controlled trial.
Trial Setting:
Recruitment to the Web-based Versus Standard Information for Same Day Hysterectomy (WISH) study will take place in gynaecology departments (general and relevant specialist clinics including menstrual disorders and pelvic pain clinics, hysteroscopy and colposcopy services) in an NHS, University-affiliated Teaching Hospital (Birmingham Women's \& Children's Hospital (BWCH) in the UK.
Identification of participants:
Eligible women will be identified by a member of the clinical team responsible for the direct care of the potential participant in outpatient gynaecology clinics and pre-operative assessment clinics in each recruiting centre. Additionally, patients already on the waiting list for SDD LH will be identified and invited to participate. The study will be introduced by a member of the clinical or research team, with full counselling about the trial. The potential participant will be advised that participation in the study is entirely voluntary with the option of withdrawing from the study at any stage. It will be made clear that participation or non-participation will not affect their usual care.
Assessment of Risk:
SDD LH is routinely practiced at the BWCH. Verbal and written, paper-based information is provided. This study provides additional, on-line, multi-media information on a specifically designed website for SDD LH. Thus, this trial is categorised as: Type A = No higher than the risk of standard medical care.
Eligibility
Women are eligible for recruitment if they meet the inclusion criteria and do not have any of the exclusion criteria set out below:
Inclusion Criteria:
- Able to give informed consent to participate
- Have a benign gynaecological condition that is being treated with a LH
- Eligible to be on same day discharge pathway Patient factors
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification I/II with no sleep apnoea. ASA III may be suitable if comorbidities are stable and optimised.
- No known cardio-pulmonary compromise
- No known renal disease
- Age </=60 years
- BMI </=40
- Not indication for admission to Gynaecological Extended Recovery Area (GERU) Surgical factors
- Presumed benign disease
- No anticipated surgical complications
- Concomitant procedures acceptable but surgeon to decide on a case by case basis Discharge factors
- Residence < 1 hour from BWCH
- Access to transport from hospital to home
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient above the age of 60
- Unwillingness or inability to comply with protocol procedures
- Women who require concomitant gynaecological surgery for bladder or other pelvic support
- Women who require concomitant gynaecological surgery for excision of deep endometriosis that requires dissection of the pararectal space
Consent
It will be the responsibility of the Investigator to obtain informed consent for each participant prior to performing any trial related procedure. A research nurse, research midwife or clinician is able to take consent providing that local practice allows this and responsibility has been delegated by the Principal Investigator as captured on the Site Signature and Delegation Log.
A Participant Information Sheet (PIS) will be provided to facilitate this process either at the time of initial consultation / hospital visit or sent through the post, via email, or by text as an attachment. Investigators or their delegate(s) will ensure that they adequately explain the aim, trial treatment, anticipated benefits and potential hazards of taking part in the trial to the participant. They will also stress that participation is voluntary and that the participant is free to decline to take part and may withdraw from the trial at any time. The participant will be given sufficient time to read the PIS and to discuss their participation with others outside of the site research team. The participant will be given the opportunity to ask questions. Where direct access to patient medical records is required the participant will give explicit consent for the regulatory authorities, members of the research team and or representatives of the sponsor to be given direct access to their medical records.
The Investigator or their delegate will then countersign and date the informed consent form (ICF). A copy of the ICF will be given to the participant (hard copy), a copy will be filed in the medical notes, and the original placed in the Investigator Site File (ISF). Once the participant is entered into the trial, the participant's trial number will be entered on the ICF maintained in the ISF.
Details of the informed consent discussions will be recorded in the participant's medical notes. This will include date of discussion, the name of the trial, summary of discussion, version number of the PIS given to participant and version number of ICF signed and date consent received. Where consent is obtained on the same day that the trial related assessments are due to start, a note should be made in the medical notes as to what time the consent was obtained and what time the procedures started.
Throughout the trial the participant will have the opportunity to ask questions about the trial. Any new information that may be relevant to the participant's continued participation will be provided. Where new information becomes available which may affect the participants' decision to continue, participants will be given time to consider and if happy to continue will be re-consented. Re-consent will be documented in the medical notes. The participant's right to withdraw from the trial at any time will remain.
Details of all patients approached about the trial will be recorded on the Participant Screening/Enrolment Log.
Recruitment, enrolment and randomisation
Recruitment:
Potential participants will be identified and approached by medical staff who are responsible for the direct care of the potential participant after having received appropriate training relating to the trial and who are delegated this task on the site delegation log. Recruitment will take place in gynaecology clinics in gynaecologist lead centres located across the United Kingdom.
The participant eligibility pathway to recruitment and randomisation is illustrated by the trial schema. Eligibility will be confirmed following discussions with the woman and a review of her medical notes by staff delegated this duty by the local principle investigator (PI).
Potential participants will be advised that taking part in the study is entirely voluntary and they may withdraw from the study at any stage without this affecting their usual care. Potential participants will be provided with a research ethics committee (REC) approved Study Participant Information Sheet (PIS) and given time to consider their involvement. However, as the intervention is simply an additional information resource (web-site link), patients will be allowed to consent during the initial consultation in clinic if they are willing to do so (PPI focus group felt that such an approach is acceptable because most women are comfortable with the internet and postal / phone follow up). However, as postal / phone follow up is required for up to 12 weeks, they will be made aware of this and take as much time as they need to consider participation.
Women who give consent will proceed to randomisation if they are eligible to participate in the trial. Consent will be recorded on the approved consent form, the original of which must be retained in the site file with a copy given to the participant.
Enrolment and Screening:
Women with benign gynaecological conditions requiring a LH and who are suitable for a SDD are eligible for inclusion. Prior to clinical consultations, the medical records of potential participants may be screened for eligibility by clinic doctors, nurses, research nurses and research midwives, after having received appropriate training relating to the trial. Clinic doctors will confirm eligibility for the trial. The same process will be applied to patients on the waiting list for SDD LH to identify eligible patients, contact them and invite them to participate.
Randomisation:
After participant eligibility has been confirmed and informed consent has been received, the participant can be randomised into the trial. Patients will be randomised in a 1:1 manner to either provision of the on-line SDD LH website resource (intervention) or standard practice for information provision (control). Randomisation will be performed via a web-based platform. If allocated to the intervention, then the website link will be provided in writing, via post, email or text (according to the patient's preference) immediately. Investigators will keep their own study file log which links patients with their allocated trial number in the trial Patient Recruitment and Identification Log.
Blinding:
Patients, clinicians, investigators, research assistants and responsible clinicians will not be blinded to the assigned allocation
Trial treatment / Intervention
Patients with a benign condition listed for a SDD LH agreeing to participate in the study who are allocated the intervention will be provided with the link to the SDD LH patient information website (see Table 1 and the website https://www.mydaycasehysterectomy.com). The option of this educational material will be in addition to the standard verbal and written patient information provided by the BWCH. Patients allocated the control group will receive standard BWCH information only.
The decision to remove or retain cervix (total or sub-total) or remove and retain ovaries will be left to the discretion of the participant in consultation with her gynaecologist. The LH will be performed or supervised by a surgeon who has self-declared as having expertise in laparoscopic hysterectomy and this requires the surgeon to meet minimum standards, regarding experience and case-load. Satisfactory experience will require surgeons to have performed a minimum of 30 cases and to have a current caseload of at least 12 cases per year
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- To evaluate the potential efficacy of additional on-line, patient education for SDD LH in achieving SDD compared to standard information giving. In addition, the utility and acceptability of patient information will be assessed as well as the impact on patient satisfaction and recovery.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| On-line SDD LH website resource (intervention) | Experimental | Other: On-line, multi-media information on a specifically designed website for Same Day Discharge following Laparoscopic HysterectomyPatients allocated the experimental arm will be provided with the link to the SDD LH patient information website (https://www.mydaycasehysterectomy.com).The option of this educational material will be in addition to the standard verbal and written patient information provided by the BWCH. |
| Standard practice for information provision (control) | Active comparator | Other: On-line, multi-media information on a specifically designed website for Same Day Discharge following Laparoscopic HysterectomyPatients allocated the control group will receive standard BWCH information only. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Able to give informed consent to participate
- Have a benign gynaecological condition that is being treated with a LH
- Eligible to be on same day discharge pathway Patient factors
- Surgical factors
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patient above the age of 60
- Unwillingness or inability to comply with protocol procedures
- Women who require concomitant gynaecological surgery for bladder or other pelvic support
- Women who require concomitant gynaecological surgery for excision of deep endometriosis that requires dissection of the pararectal space above the age of 60
- Unwillingness or inability to comply with protocol procedures
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| On-line, multi-media information on a specifically designed website for Same Day Discharge following Laparoscopic HysterectomyA patient educational website that provides clear, easily accessible, patient friendly information explaining what SDD after laparoscopic hysterectomy is, why SDD may be beneficial and what to expect from decision for surgery, through to the admission to hospital and immediate, short and long term recovery. | Other | On-line SDD LH website resource (intervention), Standard practice for information provision (control) |
Primary outcome
Same Day Discharge following laparoscopic hysterectomy (0-23hours)
Time frame: 0-24hours following surgery
This means that the patient is discharged (leaves the hospital) before midnight on the day of surgery (case notes / electronic patient record).
9 secondary outcomes
Satisfaction with care on discharge (bespoke patient questionnaire score)
Time frame: 0-24hours following surgery
Acceptability and utility of patient education / information provided (score)
Time frame: 6 weeks
Satisfaction with clinical outcome after laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) (score)
Time frame: 6 weeks
Satisfaction with care on discharge (score)
Time frame: 6 weeks
Generic quality of life post-surgery (score)
Time frame: 6 weeks
Generic quality of life post-surgery (score)
Time frame: 6 weeks
Contact with Community & Clinical Care Services
Time frame: 6 weeks
Time from surgery to resumption of usual activities in days
Time frame: 6-12 weeks
Time to return to work (if working) in days
Time frame: 6-12 weeks
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Aug 2023.
- Background: PubMed 28660800Lonky NM, Mohan Y, Chiu VY, Park J, Kivnick S, Hong C, Hudson SM. Hysterectomy for benign conditions: Complications relative to surgical approach and other variables that lead to post-operative readmission within 90 days of surgery. Womens Health (Lond). 2017 Aug;13(2):17-26. doi: 10.1177/1745505717714657. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
- Background: PubMed 30461181Madhvani K, Curnow T, Carpenter T. Route of hysterectomy: a retrospective, cohort study in English NHS Hospitals from 2011 to 2017. BJOG. 2019 May;126(6):795-802. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15539. Epub 2018 Dec 30.
- Background: PubMed 29190666Moawad G, Liu E, Song C, Fu AZ. Movement to outpatient hysterectomy for benign indications in the United States, 2008-2014. PLoS One. 2017 Nov 30;12(11):e0188812. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188812. eCollection 2017.
- Background: PubMed 19835801Warren L, Ladapo JA, Borah BJ, Gunnarsson CL. Open abdominal versus laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy: analysis of a large United States payer measuring quality and cost of care. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009 Sep-Oct;16(5):581-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.06.018.
- Background: PubMed 30963557Bailey CR, Ahuja M, Bartholomew K, Bew S, Forbes L, Lipp A, Montgomery J, Russon K, Potparic O, Stocker M. Guidelines for day-case surgery 2019: Guidelines from the Association of Anaesthetists and the British Association of Day Surgery. Anaesthesia. 2019 Jun;74(6):778-792. doi: 10.1111/anae.14639. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
- Background: PubMed 23099039Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W, Demartines N, Roulin D, Francis N, McNaught CE, MacFie J, Liberman AS, Soop M, Hill A, Kennedy RH, Lobo DN, Fearon K, Ljungqvist O; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society recommendations. Clin Nutr. 2012 Dec;31(6):783-800. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.08.013. Epub 2012 Sep 28.
- Background: PubMed 19638912Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibanes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009 Aug;250(2):187-96. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2.
- Results publication: PubMed 10601085Perino A, Cucinella G, Venezia R, Castelli A, Cittadini E. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: an assessment of the learning curve in a prospective randomized study. Hum Reprod. 1999 Dec;14(12):2996-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.12.2996.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. IPD will only be shared as part of results in a peer reviewed publication. No specific or individual participant data will be shared
Related trials for Hysterectomy
Recruiting
Implementation of a Pain Management Plan in Major Open Abdominal Surgeries.
Abdomen Cancer, Pancreas Adenocarcinoma (MSI-H)
Not yet recruiting
COMPARISON OF THE POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIC EFFECTS OF ULTRASOUND-GUIDED QUADRO-ILIAC PLANE AND TRANSVERSUS ABDOMINIS PLANE BLOCKS IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING TOTAL LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY
Postoperative Pain Following Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
RecruitingObservational study
Predictors of Success and Failure of v-NOTES Hysterectomy for Large and Very Large Uteri
Uterine Fibroids, Hysterectomy
Active, not recruiting
Clinical Assessment - HominisTM Surgical System
Hysterectomy
RecruitingPhase 4
Preoperative Acetazolamide
Post Operative Pain, Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Paul Smith, MD, MRCOG contact
TJustin Clark, MD, FRCOG principal investigator
Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing On-line, multi-media information on a specifically designed website for Same Day Discharge following Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in people with Hysterectomy and LAP, run by Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 15 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Aug 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Lina Antoun, MD, MRCOG (044 7518613461, lina.antoun1@nhs.net), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Same Day Discharge following laparoscopic hysterectomy (0-23hours) (time frame: 0-24hours following surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06011538, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Aug 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 30 Oct 2026.