AzTrials
AzTrials

Dental Caries in ChildrenNCT06012409

Evaluation of the Occlusal Effects of the Hall Technique and Investigation of Children's Satisfaction

An observational study of Dental Caries in Children, run by Aydin Adnan Menderes University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background: The Hall Technique (HT) is a non-invasive, easily applicable minimally invasive dentistry approach for managing dental caries in children. It involves placing a preformed metal crown over a tooth with decay, to seal it in and stop the decay from progressing. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 5 to 9 years
Conditions the study is for
Dental Caries in Children
What is being tested?
Hall Technique Prefabricated Metal Crown
How many people
39 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
18 Feb 2023to 1 Jan 2024
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 5 to 9 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Study population: Potential participants will be selected and recruited from children attending for routine dental care at Aydin Adnan Menderes University Paediatric Dentistry Clinic. Children and their parents will be invited to participate and will be included in the study after they have the study discussed with them and they agree to participate, giving informed consent. Children should meet the inclusion criteria, and/or be none of the exclusion criteria

Children are eligible for inclusion if:

  • they are 5 to 9 years old;
  • they fit the clinical criteria to receive a HTPMC to manage primary molars carious lesions;
  • they have antagonist primary molar
  • they have not had a HTPMC fitted before;
  • their parents can understand what is involved in the study and have signed and given assent to participate;
  • they can cooperate with dental care including having a dental impression taken; and
  • their parents are willing and able to bring them to the follow-up appointments 4, and 12 weeks after the treatment.

Children will be excluded from the study if:

  • They do not have a parental agreement to participate; or
  • They have self-reported occlusal parafunctional habits (e.g. bruxism, constantly open mouths).

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Melis AKYILDIZ

    Efeler, Aydın, 09100

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Background: The Hall Technique (HT) is a non-invasive, easily applicable minimally invasive dentistry approach for managing dental caries in children. It involves placing a preformed metal crown over a tooth with decay, to seal it in and stop the decay from progressing. However, it alters the occlusion as no tooth substance is removed to make space for the crown.

Objective: This study, aims to evaluate the effects of Hall Technique on occlusion in children, to assess whether there are any adverse effects on the temporomandibular joint and masseter muscles, related to changes on occlusion and to evaluate the children's perceptions of the crowns.

Read more

Materials and Methods: A total of 37 children aged 5-9 years, who have not been treated with the Hall Technique previously and who have dentinal caries that did not reach the pulp (affecting the occlusal or the occluso-proximal surfaces) in their primary molars, will be invited to participate in the study. At the first visit, clinical examination will be carried out and intraoral impressions will be taken for pre-treatment evaluation. The occlusal vertical dimension of the teeth will be measured clinically with callipers. Temporomandibular joint and masseter muscles will be examined clinically. Then, the Hall Technique crown will be placed to treat the carious tooth, the impressions taken again, and measurements repeated. At one and three months following treatment with the crown, the participant will have the measurements repeated. The child and parent will complete a questionnaire after 3 months on their perception of the crown.

In the data analysis, frequency, percentage, mean and standard deviation analyses will be used for demographic data and description of the clinical data. In numerical data analysis, t-test or Mann-Whitney U test will be used according to the data distribution. Geomagic software will be used to analyse sequential study models of the teeth to measure relative changes in the tooth positions over time.

Read the detailed description

Dental caries is one of the most common chronic diseases during childhood. Due to the high incidence of dental caries in the primary dentition and inadequate treatments, early childhood caries is an important public health problem for children. The main challenge in paediatric dentistry, both for the clinician and the family, is to cooperate with the child to provide the necessary treatment successfully. Although many factors affect dental anxiety, research shows that the type of dental treatment can influence the child's behaviour. Minimally invasive dental approaches have been found to offer a more comfortable treatment process. The Hall Technique is a type of minimally invasive dental treatment. It has been used for more than 20 years to treat dental caries in children. In this technique, the carious lesion is sealed under a PMC to stop the progression of caries and prevent pain and/or infection. A crown is pressed over the tooth without local anaesthesia, tooth preparation/reduction, or carious tissue removal. This makes the technique less invasive and it can be more acceptable to children than a traditional filling involving injections and drilling.

One of the drawbacks of Hall Technique is that it increases the occlusal vertical dimension (OVD) because the PMC is placed on the tooth without any preparation. It is possible that an increase in the occlusal vertical dimension could cause hyperactivity of the masticatory muscles, an increase in occlusal forces, bruxism, and temporomandibular joint disorders. The Hall Technique has reportedly temporarily increased the vertical dimension. According to clinical research, it takes approximately a month for the vertical dimension to return its pre-treatment state.

To the best of our knowledge, none of the studies have accurately determined how the child's occlusion returns to its pre-treatment state after the placement of a Hall Technique preformed metal crown. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of Hall Technique on occlusion, temporomandibular joint, and masseter muscle in children and the child's perceptions of the crown.

Being tested
Hall Technique Prefabricated Metal Crown
Keywords
Dental Caries, Children, Occlusion
Medical subject headings
Dental Caries, Bites and Stings

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Hall Technique Prefabricated Metal CrownDevice

    The Hall Technique is a type of minimally invasive dental treatment. Hall Technique involves sealing the carious lesion under a Prefabricated Metal Crown to stop its progression preventing pain and/or infection.This makes the technique less invasive and it can be more acceptable to children than a traditional filling involving injections and drilling.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Digital Occlusal Analysis

    3D occlusal analysis will be performed on models taken from impressions of participants' teeth to evaluate the effects of the placement of a HTPMC on the occlusion (crowned teeth and the surrounding and opposing teeth).

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Digital Occlusal Analysis

    3D occlusal analysis will be performed on models taken from impressions of participants' teeth to evaluate the effects of the placement of a HTPMC on the occlusion (crowned teeth and the surrounding and opposing teeth).

    Measured: Immediately After Treatment

  3. Digital Occlusal Analysis

    3D occlusal analysis will be performed on models taken from impressions of participants' teeth to evaluate the effects of the placement of a HTPMC on the occlusion (crowned teeth and the surrounding and opposing teeth).

    Measured: 1 Month

  4. Digital Occlusal Analysis

    3D occlusal analysis will be performed on models taken from impressions of participants' teeth to evaluate the effects of the placement of a HTPMC on the occlusion (crowned teeth and the surrounding and opposing teeth).

    Measured: 3 Month

Secondary outcomes (14)
  1. Occlusal Vertical Dimension (OVD) Measurements

    In order to determine whether OVD returns to pre-HTPMC placement levels, the occlusal vertical distance between the most prominent incisal points of the maxillary and mandibular cuspid/canine (on the same side of the jaw as that where the treatment takes place) will be scored. This will be measured in mm (from -10mm to 10mm) with a higher score indicating a worse outcome.

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Occlusal Vertical Dimension (OVD) Measurements

    In order to determine whether OVD returns to pre-HTPMC placement levels, the occlusal vertical distance between the most prominent incisal points of the maxillary and mandibular cuspid/canine (on the same side of the jaw as that where the treatment takes place) will be scored.This will be measured in mm (from -10mm to 10mm) with a higher score indicating a worse outcome.This will be measured in mm (from -10mm to 10mm) with a higher score indicating a worse outcome.

    Measured: Immediately After Treatment

  3. Occlusal Vertical Dimension (OVD) Measurements

    In order to determine whether OVD returns to pre-HTPMC placement levels, the occlusal vertical distance between the most prominent incisal points of the maxillary and mandibular cuspid/canine (on the same side of the jaw as that where the treatment takes place) will be scored. This will be measured in mm (from -10mm to 10mm) with a higher score indicating a worse outcome.

    Measured: 1 month

  4. Occlusal Vertical Dimension (OVD) Measurements

    In order to determine whether OVD returns to pre-HTPMC placement levels, the occlusal vertical distance between the most prominent incisal points of the maxillary and mandibular cuspid/canine (on the same side of the jaw as that where the treatment takes place) will be scored. This will be measured in mm (from -10mm to 10mm) with a higher score indicating a worse outcome.

    Measured: 3 month

  5. Detect any negative effects on the TMJ

    Clinical examination of the TMJ will be done according to AAPD Guidelines. The following questionnaire will be administered to children and parents to detect any negative effects. Does he/she have difficulty opening his/her mouth? a) Yes b) No Do you hear sounds inside your jaw joint? a) Yes b) No Is there pain in the ears or cheeks? a) Yes b) No Is there pain in the jaw when chewing, talking?

    1. Yes b) No Is there pain when chewing, talking?
    2. Yes b) No Is there pain when opening your mouth wide or yawning?
    3. Yes b) No Does biting feel uncomfortable or different from normal?
    4. Yes b) No Have you ever had locking or dislocation of the jaw?
    5. Yes b) No Is there a history of jaw, head or neck injury?
    6. Yes b) No If yes, when? How was it treated? Has he/she ever been treated for a jaw joint disorder?
    7. Yes b) No If so, when? How was it treated? Yes indicates a worse outcome

    Measured: Baseline

  6. Detect any negative effects on the TMJ

    Clinical examination of the TMJ will be done according to AAPD Guidelines.The following questionnaire will be administered to children and parents to detect any negative effects.Does he/she have difficulty opening his/her mouth? a) Yes b) No Do you hear sounds inside your jaw joint? a) Yes b) No Is there pain in the ears or cheeks? a) Yes b) No Is there pain in the jaw when chewing, talking?

    1. Yes b) No Is there pain when chewing, talking?
    2. Yes b) No Is there pain when opening your mouth wide or yawning?
    3. Yes b) No Does biting feel uncomfortable or different from normal?
    4. Yes b) No Have you ever had locking or dislocation of the jaw?
    5. Yes b) No Is there a history of jaw, head or neck injury?
    6. Yes b) No If yes, when? How was it treated? Has he/she ever been treated for a jaw joint disorder?
    7. Yes b) No If so, when? How was it treated? Yes indicates a worse outcome

    Measured: Immediately after treatment

  7. Detect any negative effects on the TMJ

    Clinical examination of the TMJ will be done according to AAPD Guidelines The following questionnaire will be administered to children and parents to detect any negative effects.Does he/she have difficulty opening his/her mouth? a) Yes b) No Do you hear sounds inside your jaw joint? a) Yes b) No Is there pain in the ears or cheeks? a) Yes b) No Is there pain in the jaw when chewing, talking?

    1. Yes b) No Is there pain when chewing, talking?
    2. Yes b) No Is there pain when opening your mouth wide or yawning?
    3. Yes b) No Does biting feel uncomfortable or different from normal?
    4. Yes b) No Have you ever had locking or dislocation of the jaw?
    5. Yes b) No Is there a history of jaw, head or neck injury?
    6. Yes b) No If yes, when? How was it treated? Has he/she ever been treated for a jaw joint disorder?
    7. Yes b) No If so, when? How was it treated? Yes indicates a worse outcome

    Measured: 1 month

  8. Detect any negative effects on the TMJ

    Clinical examination of the TMJ will be done according to AAPD Guidelines The following questionnaire will be administered to children and parents to detect any negative effects.Does he/she have difficulty opening his/her mouth? a) Yes b) No Do you hear sounds inside your jaw joint? a) Yes b) No Is there pain in the ears or cheeks? a) Yes b) No Is there pain in the jaw when chewing, talking?

    1. Yes b) No Is there pain when chewing, talking?
    2. Yes b) No Is there pain when opening your mouth wide or yawning?
    3. Yes b) No Does biting feel uncomfortable or different from normal?
    4. Yes b) No Have you ever had locking or dislocation of the jaw?
    5. Yes b) No Is there a history of jaw, head or neck injury?
    6. Yes b) No If yes, when? How was it treated? Has he/she ever been treated for a jaw joint disorder?
    7. Yes b) No If so, when? How was it treated? Yes indicates a worse outcome

    Measured: 3 month

  9. Detect any negative clinical effects of placing an HTPMC on the masseter muscles.

    Masseter muscles will be examined to evaluate the clinical symptoms following placement of an HTPMC on these tissues. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Guidelines will be used for the examination The following questionnaire will be administered to children and parents to detect any negative effects.1. The presence of sensitivity, pain or reflected pain on palpation of the masticatory muscles and cervical muscles 0=no pain, 1=palpable pain, and 2=palpebral reflex 2. Pain on palpation of the lateral capsule of the TMJs; 0=no pain, 1=palpable pain, and 2=palpebral reflex 3. Palpation and auscultation for TMJ sounds a)Available b)None 4. Limitation of mandibular movements a)Available b)None 5. Maximum opening: 0=≥35 mm, 1=25-34 mm, 2=<25 mm 6. Deflection during movement: 0=<2mm,1=2-5mm, 2=>5 mm 7.Impaired TMJ function: a)clicking b)deadlock c)luxation 0=no impairment,1=palpable click, 2=audible click, deadlock, or luxation A higher the score, indicates a worse outcome

    Measured: Baseline

  10. Detect any negative clinical effects of placing an HTPMC on the masseter muscles.

    Masseter muscles will be examined to evaluate the clinical symptoms following placement of an HTPMC on these tissues. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Guidelines will be used for the examination The following questionnaire will be administered to children and parents to detect any negative effects. 1. The presence of sensitivity, pain or reflected pain on palpation of the masticatory muscles and cervical muscles 0=no pain, 1=palpable pain, and 2=palpebral reflex 2. Pain on palpation of the lateral capsule of the TMJs; 0=no pain, 1=palpable pain, and 2=palpebral reflex 3. Palpation and auscultation for TMJ sounds a)Available b)None 4. Limitation of mandibular movements a)Available b)None 5. Maximum opening: 0=≥35 mm, 1=25-34 mm, 2=<25 mm 6. Deflection during movement: 0=<2mm,1=2-5mm, 2=>5 mm 7.Impaired TMJ function: a)clicking b)deadlock c)luxation 0=no impairment,1=palpable click, 2=audible click, deadlock, or luxation A higher the score, indicates a worse outcome

    Measured: Immediately after treatment

  11. Detect any negative clinical effects of placing an HTPMC on the masseter muscles.

    Masseter muscles will be examined to evaluate the clinical symptoms following placement of an HTPMC on these tissues. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Guidelines will be used for the examination The following questionnaire will be administered to children and parents to detect any negative effects.1. The presence of sensitivity, pain or reflected pain on palpation of the masticatory muscles and cervical muscles 0=no pain, 1=palpable pain, and 2=palpebral reflex 2. Pain on palpation of the lateral capsule of the TMJs; 0=no pain, 1=palpable pain, and 2=palpebral reflex 3. Palpation and auscultation for TMJ sounds a)Available b)None 4. Limitation of mandibular movements a)Available b)None 5. Maximum opening: 0=≥35 mm, 1=25-34 mm, 2=<25 mm 6. Deflection during movement: 0=<2mm,1=2-5mm, 2=>5 mm 7.Impaired TMJ function: a)clicking b)deadlock c)luxation 0=no impairment,1=palpable click, 2=audible click, deadlock, or luxation A higher the score, indicates a worse outcome

    Measured: 1 month

  12. Detect any negative clinical effects of placing an HTPMC on the masseter muscles.

    Masseter muscles will be examined to evaluate the clinical symptoms following placement of an HTPMC on these tissues. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Guidelines will be used for the examination The following questionnaire will be administered to children and parents to detect any negative effects.1. The presence of sensitivity, pain or reflected pain on palpation of the masticatory muscles and cervical muscles 0=no pain, 1=palpable pain, and 2=palpebral reflex 2. Pain on palpation of the lateral capsule of the TMJs; 0=no pain, 1=palpable pain, and 2=palpebral reflex 3. Palpation and auscultation for TMJ sounds a)Available b)None 4. Limitation of mandibular movements a)Available b)None 5. Maximum opening: 0=≥35 mm, 1=25-34 mm, 2=<25 mm 6. Deflection during movement: 0=<2mm,1=2-5mm, 2=>5 mm 7.Impaired TMJ function: a)clicking b)deadlock c)luxation 0=no impairment,1=palpable click, 2=audible click, deadlock, or luxation A higher the score, indicates a worse outcome

    Measured: 3 month

  13. Detect any negative clinical effects of placing an HTPMC on the masseter muscles.

    Masseter muscles will be examined to evaluate the clinical symptoms following placement of an HTPMC on these tissues. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Guidelines will be used for the examination The following questionnaire will be administered to children and parents to detect any negative effects.1. The presence of sensitivity, pain or reflected pain on palpation of the masticatory muscles and cervical muscles 0=no pain, 1=palpable pain, and 2=palpebral reflex 2. Pain on palpation of the lateral capsule of the TMJs; 0=no pain, 1=palpable pain, and 2=palpebral reflex 3. Palpation and auscultation for TMJ sounds a)Available b)None 4. Limitation of mandibular movements a)Available b)None 5. Maximum opening: 0=≥35 mm, 1=25-34 mm, 2=<25 mm 6. Deflection during movement: 0=<2mm,1=2-5mm, 2=>5 mm 7.Impaired TMJ function: a)clicking b)deadlock c)luxation 0=no impairment,1=palpable click, 2=audible click, deadlock, or luxation A higher the score, indicates a worse outcome.

    Measured: 3 month

  14. Evaluate the child's satisfaction with their HTPMC.

    A questionnaire will be carried out through an interview with children to determine what their perception of HTPMC and the procedure is.

    1. I am happy with my fixed tooth
    2. I show my fixed tooth to my friends
    3. I feel happy if people ask to see my fixed tooth
    4. I can eat well with my fixed tooth
    5. My fixed tooth never hurts me

    The scale is 0 (strongly agree) 1 (agree) 2 (no opinion) 3 (disagree) 4 (strongly disagree) A higher score indicates a worse outcome.

    Measured: 3 Month

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Aug 2023
  2. Study start18 Feb 2023
  3. Primary completion1 Sep 2023
  4. Study completion1 Jan 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
39 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06012409
Sponsor's protocol ID
DHF-21008
Status last verified
Jan 2024
First submitted
22 Aug 2023
Last updated
11 Jan 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Uribe SE, Innes N, Maldupa I. The global prevalence of early childhood caries: A systematic review with meta-analysis using the WHO diagnostic criteria. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2021 Nov;31(6):817-830. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12783. Epub 2021 Apr 30.

    PubMed 33735529
  • Klingberg G, Broberg AG. Dental fear/anxiety and dental behaviour management problems in children and adolescents: a review of prevalence and concomitant psychological factors. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2007 Nov;17(6):391-406. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2007.00872.x.

    PubMed 17935593
  • Innes NP, Evans DJ, Stirrups DR. The Hall Technique; a randomized controlled clinical trial of a novel method of managing carious primary molars in general dental practice: acceptability of the technique and outcomes at 23 months. BMC Oral Health. 2007 Dec 20;7:18. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-7-18.

    PubMed 18096042
  • van der Zee V, van Amerongen WE. Short communication: Influence of preformed metal crowns (Hall technique) on the occlusal vertical dimension in the primary dentition. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2010 Oct;11(5):225-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03262751.

    PubMed 20932395
  • Abu Serdaneh S, AlHalabi M, Kowash M, Macefield V, Khamis AH, Salami A, Hussein I. Hall technique crowns and children's masseter muscle activity: A surface electromyography pilot study. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2020 May;30(3):303-313. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12611. Epub 2020 Jan 24.

    PubMed 31894621
  • Shih YC, Yang R, Zou J. Assessment of occlusion and temporomandibular joint after placing preformed metal crowns on all primary molars in children. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2022 Nov;32(6):915-924. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12970. Epub 2022 May 18.

    PubMed 35484864
  • Elamin F, Abdelazeem N, Salah I, Mirghani Y, Wong F. A randomized clinical trial comparing Hall vs conventional technique in placing preformed metal crowns from Sudan. PLoS One. 2019 Jun 3;14(6):e0217740. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217740. eCollection 2019.

    PubMed 31158253
  • Hesse D, de Araujo MP, Olegario IC, Innes N, Raggio DP, Bonifacio CC. Atraumatic Restorative Treatment compared to the Hall Technique for occluso-proximal cavities in primary molars: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016 Mar 31;17:169. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1270-z.

    PubMed 27029801

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Dental Caries in Children, run by Aydin Adnan Menderes University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Digital Occlusal Analysis (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06012409, which also lists 8 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jan 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in