AzTrials
AzTrials

Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestNCT06012838

The Systematic Approach for Identification of Cause Among Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest Survivors

A study testing Cause classification of OHCA protocol in people with Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The cause of cardiac arrest mostly determines outcomes of cardiac arrest survivors. Identifying and treating the cause of cardiac arrest constitute a critical part in post-arrest care. However, the pathophysiology of cardiac arrest often encompasses multiple organ systems. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
What is being tested?
Cause classification of OHCA protocol
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
16 participants
Where
1 siteTaiwan
Study dates
10 Aug 2022to 10 Nov 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Residents of National Taiwan University Hospital

Who cannot join

  • Visiting staffs of National Taiwan University Hospital

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Taiwan1 site
  • National Taiwan University Hospital

    Taipei County, 100

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

The cause of cardiac arrest mostly determines outcomes of cardiac arrest survivors. Identifying and treating the cause of cardiac arrest constitute a critical part in post-arrest care. However, the pathophysiology of cardiac arrest often encompasses multiple organ systems. Thus, forming accurate diagnosis for each case presents a daunting challenge, especially for unexperienced physicians. This study aims to evaluate whether a standardized protocol would improve the diagnostic proficiency for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients.

Sixteen Emergency Medicine Residents from National Taiwan University Hospital participated in this study. The cause classification of OHCA (CCCA) protocol was developed by an expert cardiac arrest committee, and a lecture concerning the Utstein's template, the epidemiology of cardiac arrest and the CCCA protocol was addressed. Pre-/post-lecture questionnaires regarding self-assessed diagnostic certainty and knowledge of cardiac arrest were obtained and compared to evaluate participants' learning effectiveness. To validate the efficiency of protocol, medical records of 586 non-traumatic OHCA adults with successful resuscitation and ICU admission were reviewed retrospectively, and the OHCA cause of each patient was identified by the trained residents following CCCA protocol. The primary outcome was the diagnostic consistency between protocolized diagnosis, expert diagnosis and the discharge diagnosis

Read the detailed description

To identify the classification of OHCA cause, the cause classification of OHCA (CCCA) protocol was established based on previous studies, expert physician's experience and questionnaire of young physicians.

Residents from emergency department of National Taiwan University Hospital participated the program and received the lecture concerning the Utstein's template, the epidemiology of cardiac arrest, interpretation of examinations, and the CCCA protocol. To evaluate the learning effect of the lecture, pre-lecture and post-lecture questionnaire were designed, which included the knowledge for OHCA classification, confidence for correct diagnosis during CPR and after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), and the mandatory examinations for cause identification. Confidence level more than 50% was recognized as sufficient to make proper cause identification. The enrolled residents were asked to review the medical records of 3 non-traumatic adult OHCA patients before lecture and identified the OHCA cause by their own without the assist of the CCCA protocol. After lecture, another 3 medical records were reviewed by the participants with the use of the CCAC protocol. The consistency of OHCA cause between young physicians were evaluated before and after lecture, respectively.

To validate the efficiency of the CCCA protocol, these trained residents further identified the arrest cause of 586 non-traumatic adult OHCA patients who survived to ICU admission from January 2015 to July 2021 in NTUH following the established protocol.

The primary outcome was the consistency of OHCA cause between protocolized diagnosis, expert diagnosis and the discharge diagnosis. The diagnosis made by young physicians with protocol defined as protocolized diagnosis. The expert physician is an experienced emergency physicians specialized in both emergency and critical care, who has reviewed the medical records without the assistance of the established CCCA protocol. Expert diagnosis was recognized as diagnosis identified by expert physician. The discharge diagnosis is the major diagnosis related to index cardiac arrest.

Categorical variables are presented as numbers (percentages) and evaluated by the Chi-Squared test. The continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation. The Light's kappa was used to evaluate the consistency of OHCA classification. The value ≤ 0.40 indicates minimal agreement, while value ≥ 0.80 represent strong and almost perfect consistency16-17. The statistical significance was set at p <0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences Statistics (version 21.0; IBM, Chicago, IL, USA).

Being tested
Cause classification of OHCA protocol
Keywords
Non-traumatic Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest, training program
Medical subject headings
Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cause classification of OHCA protocolBehavioural

    training program with cause classification of OHCA protocol

Study groups in NCT06012838
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
cause classification of OHCA protocolExperimentalThe cause classification of OHCA protocol was developed by an expert cardiac arrest committee. A lecture concerning the Utstein's template, the epidemiology of cardiac arrest and the CCCA protocol was addressed to the participants.
Receives: Behavioral: Cause classification of OHCA protocol

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. diagnostic consistency between protocolized diagnosis and the discharge diagnosis

    The diagnosis made by young physicians with protocol defined as protocolized diagnosis. Expert diagnosis was recognized as diagnosis identified by expert physician. The expert physician is an experienced emergency physicians specialized in both emergency and critical care, who has reviewed the medical records without the assistance of the established CCCA protocol. The discharge diagnosis is the major diagnosis related to index cardiac arrest. The Light's kappa was used to evaluate the consistency of OHCA classification.

    Measured: 3 months

  2. diagnostic consistency between protocolized diagnosis and the expert diagnosis

    The diagnosis made by young physicians with protocol defined as protocolized diagnosis. Expert diagnosis was recognized as diagnosis identified by expert physician. The expert physician is an experienced emergency physicians specialized in both emergency and critical care, who has reviewed the medical records without the assistance of the established CCCA protocol. The discharge diagnosis is the major diagnosis related to index cardiac arrest. The Light's kappa was used to evaluate the consistency of OHCA classification.

    Measured: 3 months

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Portion of sufficient confidence to make proper OHCA cause identification

    To evaluate the learning effect of the lecture, pre-lecture and post-lecture questionnaire were designed. Confidence level more than 50% was recognized as sufficient to make proper cause identification. Categorical variables are presented as numbers (percentages) and evaluated by the Chi-Squared test.

    Measured: 2 months

  2. the accuracy rates on the classification test of OHCA cause before and after the lecture

    To evaluate the learning effect of the lecture, pre-lecture and post-lecture questionnaire were designed. The knowledge for OHCA classification was evaluated by the accuracy rates on each questionnaires. Categorical variables are presented as numbers (percentages) and evaluated by the Chi-Squared test.

    Measured: baseline, 2 weeks

  3. diagnostic consistency between participants before and after the lecture

    To evaluate the learning effect of the lecture, pre-lecture and post-lecture questionnaire were designed. The enrolled residents were asked to review the medical records of 3 non-traumatic adult OHCA patients before lecture and identified the OHCA cause by their own without the assist of the CCCA protocol. After lecture, another 3 medical records were reviewed by the participants with the use of the CCAC protocol. The consistency of OHCA cause between young physicians were evaluated before and after lecture, respectively. The Light's kappa was used to evaluate the consistency of OHCA classification.

    Measured: baseline, 2 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Aug 2023
  2. Study start10 Aug 2022
  3. Primary completion10 Nov 2022
  4. Study completion10 Nov 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
16 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06012838
Sponsor's protocol ID
202207125RIND
Status last verified
Aug 2023
First submitted
8 Aug 2023
Last updated
28 Aug 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Cause classification of OHCA protocol in people with Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Aug 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

diagnostic consistency between protocolized diagnosis and the discharge diagnosis (time frame: 3 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Aug 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in