UrolithiasisNCT06012864
Supine Versus Prone PNL in Pediatric
A study testing PNL in people with Urolithiasis, run by Assiut University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
To Compare the safety and efficacy of PNL in a modified flank-free supine position versus prone position in pediatric patients Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 18 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Urolithiasis
- What is being tested?
- PNL
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 30 Aug 2023to 30 Aug 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 18 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≤ 18 years old. Renal stones are amenable for PNL with Guy's stone score 1-2.
Who cannot join
- congenital anomalies. skeletal anomalies. bleeding diathesis. active urinary tract infection. Patient refusing participation. Patients with PCN.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Egypt1 site
Assiut University Hospital
Asyut, 11751
mostafa kamel, A L, 01061133200, mostafa075@aun.edu.eg
About this study
Official title: Modified Flank-free Supine Versus Prone PNL in Pediatric Renal Stones: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Trial
To Compare the safety and efficacy of PNL in a modified flank-free supine position versus prone position in pediatric patients
Read the detailed description
Incidence of pediatric urolithiasis varies from 5%-15% in developing countries to 1%-5% in the developed ones. The 5-year recurrence rate of about55% (range, 38%-70%). Fernstrom and Johansson first introduced percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) in 1976. Since that PNL has become widely used for multiple indications. Pediatric PNL was done in the prone position with more rapid and easy puncture point determination, wider field for renal puncture, free application of multiple accesses, and avoidance of visceral injuries, especially the colon. PNL in the supine position has several advantages as, similar success rate and a shorter operative time than conventional PNL. The Amplatz sheath is oriented downward, maintaining a low pressure in the renal pelvis and reducing the fluid absorption with rapid drainage of the fragmented stones. Furthermore, it's easier for the anesthesiologist to control the airway and reduce the neural and ophthalmologic pressure lesions than the prone position. Desoky et al in 2012 described the flank-free modified supine position (FFMSP) and claimed that this position overcomes the mechanical limitation of ordinary supine position because of ample space for puncture, dilatation, multiple tracts, and maneuverability of the system with the nephoscope. Moreover, the surgeon can comfortably sit during the operation, and X-ray exposure is reduced because puncture and dilatation are quite perpendicular to the body, and the operator's hands are outside the fluoroscopic field. it's better to do supine PNL in case of retro renal colon. as we see the supine position in pediatric is still under research and few trials about it had been done with no clear recommendation, so we will compare PNL in pediatric age group in modified free flank supine position versus prone position.
- Conditions
- Urolithiasis
- Being tested
- PNL
- Medical subject headings
- Urolithiasis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PNLProcedure or surgery
percutaneous extraction of the stones in the kidney
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| modified supine PNL | Experimental | patients doing FFMS PNL Receives: Procedure: PNL |
| prone PNL | Experimental | patients doing prone PNL Receives: Procedure: PNL |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
sucess rate
stone free rate
Measured: within 3 months post operative
Secondary outcomes (2)
complication rate
rate of patients develop complication
Measured: 1 month
operative time
from the puncture untill the end
Measured: intraoperative
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Aug 2023
- Study start30 Aug 2023 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 Aug 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Aug 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for UrolithiasisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assiut UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Patients divided into two groups (group A: modified supine PNL, group B: prone PNL)
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assiut University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mostafa Kamel Abdel Rahman, Assiut University
- Investigators
- Ahmed Eltaher, MD, Study director, Assiut University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06012864
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Supine pediatric PNL
- Status last verified
- Aug 2023
- First submitted
- 22 Aug 2023
- Last updated
- 28 Aug 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Holman E, Khan AM, Flasko T, Toth C, Salah MA. Endoscopic management of pediatric urolithiasis in a developing country. Urology. 2004 Jan;63(1):159-62; discussion 162. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.08.043.
PubMed 14751372Lao M, Kogan BA, White MD, Feustel PJ. High recurrence rate at 5-year followup in children after upper urinary tract stone surgery. J Urol. 2014 Feb;191(2):440-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.09.021. Epub 2013 Sep 16.
PubMed 24050895Liatsikos EN, Kallidonis P, Stolzenburg JU, Ost M, Keeley F, Traxer O, Bernardo N, Perimenis P, Smith AD. Percutaneous management of staghorn calculi in horseshoe kidneys: a multi-institutional experience. J Endourol. 2010 Apr;24(4):531-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0264.
PubMed 20218888Caione P, De Dominicis M, Collura G, Matarazzo E, Nappo SG, Capozza N. Microperc for pediatric nephrolithiasis: technique in valdivia-modified position. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2015 Feb;25(1):94-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1387939. Epub 2014 Sep 13.
PubMed 25217714Desoky EAE, Sakr AM, ElSayed ER, Ali MM. Ultra-Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Flank-Free Modified Supine Position vs Prone Position in Treatment of Pediatric Renal Pelvic and Lower Caliceal Stones. J Endourol. 2022 May;36(5):610-614. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0557. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
PubMed 34861776Falahatkar S, Moghaddam AA, Salehi M, Nikpour S, Esmaili F, Khaki N. Complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotripsy comparison with the prone standard technique. J Endourol. 2008 Nov;22(11):2513-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0463.
PubMed 19046091Vicentini FC, Torricelli FC, Mazzucchi E, Hisano M, Murta CB, Danilovic A, Claro JF, Srougi M. Modified complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: solving some problems. J Endourol. 2013 Jul;27(7):845-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0725. Epub 2013 Jun 8.
PubMed 23373958Kukreja RA, Desai MR, Sabnis RB, Patel SH. Fluid absorption during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: does it matter? J Endourol. 2002 May;16(4):221-4. doi: 10.1089/089277902753752160.
PubMed 12042103Desoky EA, Allam MN, Ammar MK, Abdelwahab KM, Elsaid DA, Fawzi AM, Alayman AA, Shahin AM, Kamel HM. Flank free modified supine position: A new modification for supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Arab J Urol. 2012 Jun;10(2):143-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2011.12.008. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
PubMed 26558017De Sio M, Autorino R, Quarto G, Calabro F, Damiano R, Giugliano F, Mordente S, D'Armiento M. Modified supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones treatable with a single percutaneous access: a prospective randomized trial. Eur Urol. 2008 Jul;54(1):196-202. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.01.067. Epub 2008 Feb 4.
PubMed 18262711Emiliani E, Quiroz YY, Llorens E, Quintian C, Motta G, Villada D, Bujons A. Retrorenal colon in pediatric patients with urolithiasis: Is the supine position for PCNL advantageous? J Pediatr Urol. 2022 Dec;18(6):741.e1-741.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.07.028. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
PubMed 35985922
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Aug 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Modified Flank-free Supine Versus Prone PNL in Pediatric Renal Stones: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06012864
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Supine pediatric PNL
- Conditions
- Urolithiasis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Assiut UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 30 Aug 2023 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 Aug 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Aug 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 28 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To Compare the safety and efficacy of PNL in a modified flank-free supine position versus prone position in pediatric patients
Detailed description
Incidence of pediatric urolithiasis varies from 5%-15% in developing countries to 1%-5% in the developed ones. The 5-year recurrence rate of about55% (range, 38%-70%). Fernstrom and Johansson first introduced percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) in 1976. Since that PNL has become widely used for multiple indications. Pediatric PNL was done in the prone position with more rapid and easy puncture point determination, wider field for renal puncture, free application of multiple accesses, and avoidance of visceral injuries, especially the colon. PNL in the supine position has several advantages as, similar success rate and a shorter operative time than conventional PNL. The Amplatz sheath is oriented downward, maintaining a low pressure in the renal pelvis and reducing the fluid absorption with rapid drainage of the fragmented stones. Furthermore, it's easier for the anesthesiologist to control the airway and reduce the neural and ophthalmologic pressure lesions than the prone position. Desoky et al in 2012 described the flank-free modified supine position (FFMSP) and claimed that this position overcomes the mechanical limitation of ordinary supine position because of ample space for puncture, dilatation, multiple tracts, and maneuverability of the system with the nephoscope. Moreover, the surgeon can comfortably sit during the operation, and X-ray exposure is reduced because puncture and dilatation are quite perpendicular to the body, and the operator's hands are outside the fluoroscopic field. it's better to do supine PNL in case of retro renal colon. as we see the supine position in pediatric is still under research and few trials about it had been done with no clear recommendation, so we will compare PNL in pediatric age group in modified free flank supine position versus prone position.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Patients divided into two groups (group A: modified supine PNL, group B: prone PNL)
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| modified supine PNL | Experimental | Procedure: PNLpatients doing FFMS PNL |
| prone PNL | Experimental | Procedure: PNLpatients doing prone PNL |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 18 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Age ≤ 18 years old. Renal stones are amenable for PNL with Guy's stone score 1-2.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- congenital anomalies. skeletal anomalies. bleeding diathesis. active urinary tract infection. Patient refusing participation. Patients with PCN.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PNLpercutaneous extraction of the stones in the kidney | Procedure or surgery | modified supine PNL, prone PNL |
Primary outcome
sucess rate
Time frame: within 3 months post operative
stone free rate
2 secondary outcomes
complication rate
Time frame: 1 month
operative time
Time frame: intraoperative
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Aug 2023.
- Background: PubMed 14751372Holman E, Khan AM, Flasko T, Toth C, Salah MA. Endoscopic management of pediatric urolithiasis in a developing country. Urology. 2004 Jan;63(1):159-62; discussion 162. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.08.043.
- Background: PubMed 24050895Lao M, Kogan BA, White MD, Feustel PJ. High recurrence rate at 5-year followup in children after upper urinary tract stone surgery. J Urol. 2014 Feb;191(2):440-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.09.021. Epub 2013 Sep 16.
- Background: PubMed 20218888Liatsikos EN, Kallidonis P, Stolzenburg JU, Ost M, Keeley F, Traxer O, Bernardo N, Perimenis P, Smith AD. Percutaneous management of staghorn calculi in horseshoe kidneys: a multi-institutional experience. J Endourol. 2010 Apr;24(4):531-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0264.
- Background: PubMed 25217714Caione P, De Dominicis M, Collura G, Matarazzo E, Nappo SG, Capozza N. Microperc for pediatric nephrolithiasis: technique in valdivia-modified position. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2015 Feb;25(1):94-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1387939. Epub 2014 Sep 13.
- Background: PubMed 34861776Desoky EAE, Sakr AM, ElSayed ER, Ali MM. Ultra-Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Flank-Free Modified Supine Position vs Prone Position in Treatment of Pediatric Renal Pelvic and Lower Caliceal Stones. J Endourol. 2022 May;36(5):610-614. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0557. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
- Background: PubMed 19046091Falahatkar S, Moghaddam AA, Salehi M, Nikpour S, Esmaili F, Khaki N. Complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotripsy comparison with the prone standard technique. J Endourol. 2008 Nov;22(11):2513-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0463.
- Background: PubMed 23373958Vicentini FC, Torricelli FC, Mazzucchi E, Hisano M, Murta CB, Danilovic A, Claro JF, Srougi M. Modified complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: solving some problems. J Endourol. 2013 Jul;27(7):845-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0725. Epub 2013 Jun 8.
- Background: PubMed 12042103Kukreja RA, Desai MR, Sabnis RB, Patel SH. Fluid absorption during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: does it matter? J Endourol. 2002 May;16(4):221-4. doi: 10.1089/089277902753752160.
- Background: PubMed 26558017Desoky EA, Allam MN, Ammar MK, Abdelwahab KM, Elsaid DA, Fawzi AM, Alayman AA, Shahin AM, Kamel HM. Flank free modified supine position: A new modification for supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Arab J Urol. 2012 Jun;10(2):143-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2011.12.008. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
- Background: PubMed 18262711De Sio M, Autorino R, Quarto G, Calabro F, Damiano R, Giugliano F, Mordente S, D'Armiento M. Modified supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones treatable with a single percutaneous access: a prospective randomized trial. Eur Urol. 2008 Jul;54(1):196-202. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.01.067. Epub 2008 Feb 4.
- Background: PubMed 35985922Emiliani E, Quiroz YY, Llorens E, Quintian C, Motta G, Villada D, Bujons A. Retrorenal colon in pediatric patients with urolithiasis: Is the supine position for PCNL advantageous? J Pediatr Urol. 2022 Dec;18(6):741.e1-741.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.07.028. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Urolithiasis
Recruiting
Randomized Controlled Trial of Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy With Vacuum-Assisted Access Sheaths Versus Conventional Sheaths for Treatment of Nephrolithiasis
Kidney Stone
Recruiting
The Effect of Acupuncture on Passing Ureteral Stones
Ureter Calculi
RecruitingObservational study
Comparison of Trans-Stomial Bladder Lithotripsy Using Mini-Percutaneous Equipment Versus Trans-stomial Bladder Lithotripsy Using Flexible Fibroscope, Percutaneous Approach and Open Cystolithotomy in Patients With Continent Catheterizable Urinary Reservoir
Bladder Calculi, Continent Catheterizable Urinary Reservoir
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Novel Antimicrobial Solution to Prevent Infections
Kidney Stone, Infection
Not yet recruiting
DISS vs FANS in Suction-Assisted RIRS for Medium-Sized Renal Stones
Kidney Stones, Nephrolithiasis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ahmed Eltaher, MD study director
Assiut University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing PNL in people with Urolithiasis, run by Assiut University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Aug 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact mostafa kamel, A L (01061133200, mostafa075@aun.edu.eg), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
sucess rate (time frame: within 3 months post operative). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06012864, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Aug 2023.