AzTrials
AzTrials

Hospital-associated DeconditioningPIVOTNCT06017934

Promoting Increased Physical Activity in Hospitalised Older Adults

A study testing Volunteer-led physical activity in people with Hospital-associated Deconditioning, run by University of Southampton at 2 sites in United Kingdom.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The PIVOT study will explore the feasibility of training volunteers to deliver exercise to hospitalised older adults to improve the health of older people and prevent deconditioning while in hospital. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Hospital-associated Deconditioning
What is being tested?
Volunteer-led physical activity
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
225 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited Kingdom
Study dates
6 Jun 2024to Nov 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients
  • Adults aged 65 years and above
  • Able to provide written informed consent
  • Volunteers
  • Adults aged 18 years and above
  • Completed the generic clearance and training with the hospital voluntary services
  • Able to provide written informed consent
  • Able to communicate fluently enough in English. Fluent English is required to ensure the intervention content can be delivered clearly and thus safely to participants.

Who cannot join

  • Patients
  • Anyone with a severe cognitive impairment (MoCA less than 10)
  • Patients isolated for infection control reasons
  • Patients receiving end of life care
  • Volunteers
  • Volunteers that are unable to safely complete the exercises included in the intervention will be excluded from the study.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Stephen ER Lim, PhD contact

+442381206131

s.e.lim@soton.ac.uk

Samantha J Meredith, PhD contact

07825104783

s.j.meredith@soton.ac.uk

United Kingdom2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • Frimley Park Hospital

    Frimley, Surrey, GU16 7UJ

    Lucy J Abbott, Consultant Geriatrician, +44 0300 614 5000, lucyjane.abbott@nhs.net

    Recruiting
  • Salisbury District Hospital

    Salisbury, Wiltshire, SP2 8BJ

    Carmen Carroll, Consultant geriatrician, +44 01722 336262 ext 3576, carmen.carroll3@nhs.net

    Recruiting

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: PIVOT Trial: Promoting Increased Physical Activity in Hospitalised Older Adults With Trained Volunteers: An Implementation Feasibility Study

The PIVOT study will explore the feasibility of training volunteers to deliver exercise to hospitalised older adults to improve the health of older people and prevent deconditioning while in hospital. Loss of strength and mobility (i.e., deconditioning) is common in hospitalised older people and is associated with a decline in physical function, poorer quality of life and increased health and care costs. Physical inactivity is an important and modifiable risk factor. A previous study showed it is feasible to train volunteers to engage with older people in hospital and facilitate walking and bedside exercises. The intervention was well-received by older adults, staff members and volunteers. The aim of this study is to determine the feasibility of implementing volunteer-led physical activity in three hospitals of varying sizes in different regions.

Older adults aged 65 years and above admitted to an acute hospital will be invited to participate in the study. The study aims to recruit 180 participants; 90 from three intervention sites and 90 from a control site. Participants at the intervention sites will receive a twice daily volunteer-led physical activity intervention, and participants at the control site will receive usual care.

Read more

Participants who are able to mobilise independently will perform walking exercises and individuals with mobility impairments will perform bedside exercises. The volunteers will be trained and monitored by hospital therapists. The acceptability of the intervention will be explored through interviews with patients, volunteers, and staff. Intervention feasibility will also be examined through measuring retention of trainers, volunteers, and patients on the intervention, and adherence to the exercise.

Study findings will help to determine the feasibility of the volunteer-led physical activity intervention across different sized hospitals, voluntary service teams, and therapy services to explore the implementation and roll out of the intervention across NHS sites and the development of a toolkit to support knowledge transfer.

Read the detailed description

Aim The aim of the current research is to explore whether volunteers can be trained to deliver exercise support to older adults across three different sized hospitals in different locations. Researchers will also explore if the intervention is accepted by patients, volunteers and staff and if it has any benefits on patients' health and functional outcomes (e.g., quality of life and muscle strength).

Study Design This is a multicentre feasibility study using mixed methods (i.e., quantitative and qualitative measures) to explore the implementation of a volunteer-led physical activity intervention to older adults in hospital. The study will include three intervention sites and one control site. Feasibility studies are used to determine whether an intervention is appropriate for further evaluation, to determine sample sizes for controlled trials and to assess whether the ideas and findings can be shaped to be relevant and sustainable.

Sample Size A sample size of 180 patients, 90 intervention (30 from each intervention site) and 90 from the control site, was chosen in line with previous sample size recommendations for feasibility studies of 24-50 participants. This sample size was considered an appropriate number that is pragmatic and achievable within the study timescale and resources available at each site.

This research aims to recruit 15 volunteers at each site to provide sufficient cover to deliver the intervention. In a previous study (SoMoVe trial) 17 volunteers were recruited, 16 completed training and 12 were retained.

Recruitment and Consent Older adults with an acute medical admission to four hospitals will be screened for eligibility by research nurses. Eligible patients will be introduced to the study by ward staff. Those who are interested in the study will be approached by the research team for further information and information sheets will be provided. Written informed consent will be obtained from all patients who agree to participate in the study.

Volunteers will be invited by hospital voluntary services within each hospital site. The voluntary services team will send the interested volunteers details to the research team, who will then get in contact to complete informed consent.

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria Patients: The inclusion criteria are adults aged 65 years and above who are able to provide informed consent. Exclusion criteria are anyone with a severe cognitive impairment (MoCA less than 10), patients isolated for infection control reasons, and patients receiving end of life care.

Volunteers: The inclusion criteria for volunteers are age 18 years and above, who have completed the generic clearance and training with the hospital voluntary services, who can provide written informed consent, and are able to communicate fluently enough in English. Fluent English is required to ensure the intervention content can be delivered clearly and thus safely to participants. Volunteers that are unable to safely complete the exercises included in the intervention will be excluded from the study.

Intervention The exercises were developed based on clinical expertise from therapists and from our previous research of volunteer-led mobility interventions in hospital (SoMoVe study). Participants will be assessed by the therapy team who will prescribe tailored activity and then liaise with the mobility volunteers, who will deliver the intervention. Participants who can mobilise independently will be encouraged to perform walking exercises, progressing their walking distance over set markers in the hospital (e.g., to the end of the bed and back; to the doorway and back; to the toilet and back). Participants who require assistance in mobility will perform bed (e.g., hip abduction, static quads), or chair exercises (e.g., ankle pumps, knee extension, arm raise), and will be progressed to performing walking exercises when their physical function improves. Volunteers will check with nursing staff that participants are safe to exercise before each activity session. Participants will receive the mobility sessions twice daily, starting upon recruitment and continuing until the day of discharge from hospital.

Training The volunteer training package was developed by a clinician and therapist and will cover topics including patient and personal safety, mobility and exercise training, and response to adverse evets, such as falls. Volunteers will participate in practical sessions to practice the exercises with peers. When ready, volunteers will work with patients, initially under close supervision and when deemed competent by the trainer, they will be encouraged to support mobility sessions independently. A volunteer competency checklist will be completed and signed off by the trainer before volunteers work independently. The training will be delivered by a physiotherapist in each intervention site.

Fidelity Checks Throughout the study period, fidelity checks will be conducted by the trainers once every 2 weeks to ensure that the volunteers are delivering high quality and safe exercise. The volunteers will be observed and assessed against a competency and implementation checklist, including personal safety, basic patient safety, pre-intervention tasks (e.g., safe set up of exercise space), and exercise delivery (e.g., showing safe and effective exercise technique). Volunteers will be asked to keep an attendance record during the intervention using session completion logs. Regular monthly volunteer meetings will be scheduled online to discuss experiences and gain feedback from peers and trainers. Based upon fidelity checks and volunteer feedback, extra one-to-one training sessions will be available if necessary. The principle investigator will also visit intervention sites to observe and liaise with volunteers and trainers.

Data Collection Data including age, sex, co-morbidities, medications, functional status, and cognition will provide participants' baseline characteristics in both intervention and control sites.

Volunteer data including age, occupation, qualifications, volunteering experience, any physiotherapy, sport or therapeutic experience, and employment status will be collected. Data on the study sites including hospital size, size of voluntary service team, the number of hospital volunteers, and information on the therapy services and what usual care looks like will be collected to provide contextual information.

The primary outcome measures are feasibility (can it be done?) and acceptability (will volunteers, staff, and patients accept and embrace the programme?) of the intervention.

Feasibility will be assessed by:

  1. Number of trainers trained and retained in each hospital site (total number and %)
  2. Number of volunteers recruited, trained, and retained (total number and %)
  3. Recruitment rate (%) of participants in each site
  4. Adherence to the intervention (total number and %)

Acceptability will be assessed through process evaluation involving:

  1. Observation and monitoring of volunteer training
  2. Interviews with therapy managers to establish usual care in each site
  3. Observation of the interaction between volunteers, patients, and healthcare professionals on the wards, including contextual factors that may potentially influence the delivery and receipt of the intervention.

Qualitative interviews will be conducted with service managers, therapy managers, patients, nurses, ward therapists, and volunteers from all study sites, to determine the acceptability of the intervention. Purposive sampling will be conducted to capture a range of experiences and opinions from patients of varying age and mobility levels, staff with varying seniority and gender mix, and volunteers with a range of volunteering experience, age groups, and gender mix. The interviews will explore barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the intervention into routine clinical practice.

Fidelity Assessment Fidelity assessment will be conducted across all study sites to ensure that the exercises and prescribed dose are delivered by the volunteers as prescribed. Volunteers will be trained to document each physical activity session in participant exercise diaries, detailing whether all the exercises were carried out as prescribed, or whether some exercises were excluded, and reasons for exclusions. The exercise diaries will be affixed to participants' activity prescription sheet. Further assessments of fidelity of volunteer training and the intervention will be conducted through site visits by the research fellow once every 2 months and to address any issues that arise.

Secondary Outcome Measures The secondary outcome measures will include assessment of physical activity levels (StepWatch Activity Monitor; SAM; Modus health, Washington, USA), physical function (Short Physical Performance Battery and grip strength), and quality of life (EuroQol; EQ-5D-5L). Moreover, data on length of hospital stay and hospital readmission will be accessed through electronic patient records. Data collection will be conducted by research nurses, supported by the local principal investigators.

Data Analysis Primary Outcome Analyses Participants' baseline characteristics will be described using summary statistics, including mean (standard deviations), medians (interquartile ranges), counts and proportions, as appropriate. Statistical analysis will be conducted using the statistical software SPSS. Summary statistics will be used to describe the feasibility of recruiting, training, and retaining the trainers, the volunteers and study participants. Participants' exercise diaries will be analysed to determine how many physical activity sessions were offered and the number and percentage of completed sessions.

Data collected from the interviews will be transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis (TA). The audio- recordings will be transcribed by an administrative colleague within the research department who is experienced in transcribing qualitative data. TA is a method for identifying, analysing and reporting patterns or themes within data and is widely used in qualitative research. Transcribed text will be read and coded separately and then together by two researchers. The codes will be analysed to generate concepts and ideas to determine the acceptability of the intervention, and to identify facilitators and barriers to the implementation process. The codes act as tags or labels to help catalogue key concepts embedded within the raw data. From the codes, themes will be developed to reflect the views and experiences of the older adults and volunteers regarding the volunteer-led physical activity intervention.

Secondary Outcome Analyses Daily step count, Short Physical Performance Battery, grip strength, and quality of life measured on recruitment and discharge, and length of hospital stay will be analysed as continuous variables. The completion rate of each data item will be measured. The distribution of each outcome measure will be assessed for normality and described using parametric or non-parametric statistics accordingly. Hospital readmission in 3 and 6 months will be analysed as a categorical variable. Where there is missing data, the main analyses will be based on available data.

Being tested
Volunteer-led physical activity
Keywords
Physical activity, Hospital-associated deconditioning, Sedentary behaviour, Physical inactivity, Volunteer-led, Feasibility, Implementation
Medical subject headings
Motor Activity, Sedentary Behavior

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Volunteer-led physical activityBehavioural

    Participants will be assessed by the therapy team who will prescribe tailored activity and then liaise with the mobility volunteers, who will deliver the intervention. Participants who can mobilise independently will be encouraged to perform walking exercises, progressing their walking distance over set markers in the hospital (e.g., to the end of the bed and back; to the doorway and back; to the toilet and back). Participants who require assistance in mobility will perform bed (e.g., hip abduction, static quads), or chair exercises (e.g., ankle pumps, knee extension, arm raise), and will be progressed to performing walking exercises when their physical function improves. Volunteers will check with nursing staff that participants are safe to exercise before each activity session. Participants will receive the mobility sessions twice daily, starting upon recruitment and continuing until the day of discharge from hospital.

Study groups in NCT06017934
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ControlNo interventionUsual care
Volunteer-led physical activityExperimentalTrained volunteers will deliver walking, or bedside exercises with hospitalised older adults twice per day.
Receives: Behavioral: Volunteer-led physical activity

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Qualitative interview data exploring the acceptability of the intervention, including barriers and enablers to the implementation of the intervention.

    Qualitative interviews will be conducted with service managers, therapy managers, patients, nurses, ward therapists, and volunteers from all study sites, to determine the acceptability of the intervention.

    Measured: through intervention completion, an average of 2 months

  2. The number of volunteers recruited to the study (%).

    Feasibility of recruiting volunteers to deliver the physical activity intervention at each hospital site

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 3 years

  3. Number of trainers trained in each hospital site (%)

    Feasibility of recruiting therapists to deliver the intervention at each hospital site.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 3 years

  4. Adherence to the intervention (%)

    The number of participants retained in the intervention at each hospital site.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 3 years

  5. Recruitment rate (%) of participants in each site

    Feasibility of recruiting older adults onto the volunteer-led physical activity intervention at each hospital site.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 3 years

  6. The number of volunteers trained at the end of the study period (%)

    Feasibility of training volunteers to deliver the physical activity intervention at each hospital site

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 3 years

  7. The number of volunteers retained at the end of the study period (%)

    Feasibility of retaining volunteers to deliver the physical activity intervention at each hospital site

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 3 years

  8. Number of trainers retained in each hospital site (%)

    Feasibility of retaining therapists to deliver the intervention at each hospital site.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 3 years

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Patient's subjective assessment of quality of life - visual analogue scale (VAS)

    Quality of life will be measured using the EuroQol (EQ-5D-5L) VAS. The VAS subjectively rates health from 0 (the worst health you can imagine) to 100 (the best health you can imagine).

    Measured: Baseline and post intervention, an average of 2 months

  2. Grip strength

    Grip strength is a simple and accurate measure of muscle function in clinical practice. Grip strength will be measured using the Jamar hand dynamometer, the most widely used instrument in clinical practice with established test-retest, inter-rater and intra-rater reliability.

    Measured: Baseline and post intervention, an average of 2 months

  3. Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)

    The SPPB is a reliable and valid measure of physical function in older people ≥ 60 years and includes exploration of three domains, including walking speed, chair stands, and three progressive balance tasks.

    Measured: Baseline and post intervention, an average of 2 months

  4. Physical activity

    Physical activity will be measured using the StepWatch Activity Monitor (SAM; Modus health, Washington, USA), recording daily step count. The SAM is worn on the ankle and is considered an accurate measure of physical activity in older hospitalised patients that engage in low-intensity physical activity and have lower walking speeds.

    Measured: 7 days upon recruitment

  5. Patient's subjective assessment of quality of life - EuroQol (EQ-5D-5L)

    Quality of life will be measured using the EuroQol (EQ-5D-5L) assessment comprising a short descriptive questionnaire. The questionnaire includes 5 domains (e.g., mobility; self-care; usual activities; pain/discomfort; and anxiety/depression) measured with 5 response levels from 'no problems' to 'extreme problems/unable'.

    Measured: Baseline and post intervention, an average of 2 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Aug 2023
  2. Study start6 Jun 2024
  3. Primary completionNov 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionNov 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
225 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06017934
Sponsor's protocol ID
ERGO 84163
Acronym
PIVOT
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
18 Jul 2023
Last updated
13 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Lim S, Ibrahim K, Dodds R, Purkis A, Baxter M, Rogers A, Sayer AA, Roberts HC. Physical activity in hospitalised older people: the feasibility and acceptability of a volunteer-led mobility intervention in the SoMoVe study. Age Ageing. 2020 Feb 27;49(2):283-291. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afz114.

    PubMed 31566671
  • Meredith SJ, Roberts H, Grocott MPW, Jack S, Murphy J, Varkonyi-Sepp J, Bates A, Lim SER. Frail2Fit study protocol: a feasibility and acceptability study of a virtual multimodal intervention delivered by volunteers to improve functional outcomes in older adults with frailty after discharge from hospital. BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 16;13(3):e069533. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069533.

    PubMed 36927597
  • Lim SER, Meredith S, Agnew S, Clift E, Ibrahim K, Roberts H. Evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of virtual group exercise for older adults delivered by trained volunteers: the ImPACt study protocol. BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 1;12(2):e052631. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052631.

    PubMed 35105576

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Volunteer-led physical activity in people with Hospital-associated Deconditioning, run by University of Southampton at 2 sites in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Stephen ER Lim, PhD (+442381206131, s.e.lim@soton.ac.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Qualitative interview data exploring the acceptability of the intervention, including barriers and enablers to the implementation of the intervention. (time frame: through intervention completion, an average of 2 months). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06017934, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 May 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in