AzTrials
AzTrials

Cutaneous Squamous Cell CarcinomaNCT06020612

Interobserver Variability Desmoplasia

An observational study of Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Pathology, run by Maastricht University Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

According to the most recent guideline of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), desmoplasia is considered to be a very high risk factor for recurrence, metastasis and death in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 years and older
What is being tested?
Assessment by dermatopathologists
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteNetherlands
Study dates
1 Jul 2023to 1 Jun 2024
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: The study population consists of adult patients, both male and female, who were treated at MUMC+ between 2010 and 2018 for a cSCC, with and without desmoplasia, and whose histology is available.

Who may be able to join

  • Histological coupes of patients with a cSCC between 2010 and 2018 (both cSCC with and without desmoplasia are included)
  • Treated at the Maastricht University Medical Center+ (MUMC+)in Maastricht for their cSCC
  • Of which the histology is available in the MUMC+

Who cannot join

  • None

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Netherlands1 site
  • Maastricht University Medical Center+

    Maastricht

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: Desmoplasia in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Inter Observer Agreement Between Dermatopathologists.

According to the most recent guideline of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), desmoplasia is considered to be a very high risk factor for recurrence, metastasis and death in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). The presence of desmoplasia is assessed by dermatopathologists during histological examination of cSCCs. However, the inter-observer agreement is between dermatopathologists in the assessment of desmoplasia is unclear. Studies on inter-observer variability in the assessment of differentiation grade in cSCCs showed that there is only a weak to moderate agreement among dermatopathologists in the assessment of differentiation grade (2-4). This study aims to investigate the interobserver agreement of desmoplasia between dermatopathologists. In this prospective study, 50 cSCCs will be assessed for desmoplasia by at least eight dermatopathologists using a predefined definition.

Being tested
Assessment by dermatopathologists
Keywords
Interobserver variability, Interobserver agreement, Reproducibility, Dermatopathologist, Desmoplasia
Medical subject headings
Recurrence, Neoplasm Metastasis, Fibrosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Assessment by dermatopathologistsOther

    Histological assessment of the cSCCs by eight dermatopathologists.

Study groups in NCT06020612
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Presence of desmoplasiaTumors with presence of desmoplasia according to the predefined definition.
Receives: Other: Assessment by dermatopathologists
Absence of desmoplasiaTumors in absence of desmoplasia according to the predefined definition.
Receives: Other: Assessment by dermatopathologists

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Interobserver agreement

    Interobserver agreement between dermatopathologists in the assessment of desmoplasia, expressed as percentages and Fleiss' kappa (Landis and Koch, see below) <0 Poor agreement 0.0-0.20 Slight agreement 0.21-0.40 Fair agreement 0.41-0.60 Moderate agreement 0.61-0.80 Substantial agreement 0.81-1.00 Almost perfect agreement

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 2 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Definitions used

    A description of the different definitions of desmoplasia used by the dermatopathologists.

    Measured: Before the histological assessment, at baseline.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Aug 2023
  2. Study start1 Jul 2023
  3. Primary completion1 May 2024
  4. Study completion1 Jun 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
50 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06020612
Sponsor's protocol ID
2023-3752
Status last verified
Mar 2025
First submitted
18 Aug 2023
Last updated
4 Apr 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Squamous Cell Skin Cancer (Version 2.2022) May 2, 2022. Retrieved from https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/squamous.pdf

  • Prezzano JC, Scott GA, Lambert Smith F, Mannava KA, Ibrahim SF. Concordance of Squamous Cell Carcinoma Histologic Grading Among Dermatopathologists and Mohs Surgeons. Dermatol Surg. 2021 Nov 1;47(11):1433-1437. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003213.

    PubMed 34482328
  • Fujimoto M, Yamamoto Y, Takai T, Fujimoto N, Ogawa K, Yoshikawa T, Matsuzaki I, Takahashi Y, Iwahashi Y, Warigaya K, Kojima F, Jinnin M, Murata SI. Tumor Budding Is an Objective High-risk Factor Associated With Metastasis and Poor Clinical Prognosis in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Sized <4 cm. Am J Surg Pathol. 2019 Jul;43(7):975-983. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001284.

    PubMed 31094931
  • Nash J, Shahwan KT, Chung C, Abidi N, Gokun Y, Pan X, Carr DR. Grading of differentiation in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: Evaluation of interrater and intrarater reliability. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022 Oct;87(4):895-897. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.12.015. Epub 2021 Dec 15. No abstract available.

    PubMed 34920027
  • Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74.

    PubMed 843571

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Pathology, run by Maastricht University Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Interobserver agreement (time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06020612, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Apr 2025.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in