AzTrials
AzTrials

Community-acquired PneumoniaEMPOWERNCT06027593

Using Electronically Derived Automated Reports of Appropriate Antibiotic Use to Inform Stewardship Interventions

A study testing Quasi experimental intervention in people with Community-acquired Pneumonia and Acute Otitis Media, run by Children's Hospital of Philadelphia at 2 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The main goal of this study is to use automated electronic reports to assess and improve guideline-concordant antibiotic use for: 1) adult inpatients with community-acquired pneumonia; 2) pediatric inpatients with community-acquired pneumonia; 3) adult outpatients with acute pharyngitis; and 4) pediatric outpatients… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
What is being tested?
Quasi experimental intervention
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
26,139 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
18 Oct 2022to 31 Jul 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Patient Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of one of four conditions based on ICD-10 diagnostic codes.

Patient Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of specific complex chronic conditions
  • Use of immunocompromising medications
  • Transfer from another health facility.

Clinician Inclusion Criteria:

  • Prescribing clinicians (including attending physicians, fellows, residents, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants) at one of the participating outpatient practices or inpatient units.
  • Age ≥ 18 years old
  • Employed by one of the participating sites

Clinician Exclusion Criteria:

  • Volunteers or other non-employee hospital staff
  • Limited English proficiency

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

  • University of Pennsylvania Health System

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Using Electronically Derived AutoMated RePOrts of Appropriate Antibiotic Use to Inform SteWardship IntERventions

The main goal of this study is to use automated electronic reports to assess and improve guideline-concordant antibiotic use for:

  1. adult inpatients with community-acquired pneumonia; 2) pediatric inpatients with community-acquired pneumonia; 3) adult outpatients with acute pharyngitis; and 4) pediatric outpatients with acute otitis media.
Read the detailed description

Antibiotic stewardship has been shown to improve patient outcomes, decrease adverse events, and decrease antibiotic resistance. This group of investigators previously partnered with collaborators at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and conducted relevant pilot work in developing and validating electronic indicators of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for 8 conditions, amongst which are the four conditions of interest in this study: adult inpatients with community-acquired pneumonia; pediatric inpatients with community-acquired pneumonia; adult outpatients with acute pharyngitis; and pediatric outpatients with acute otitis media. Methods were developed to generate automatic, routine reports to identify elements of inappropriate antibiotic use including; 1) the decision to initiate antibiotic therapy (pharyngitis and acute otitis media only); 2) the choice of antibiotic agent; and 3) the duration of antibiotic use.

The purpose of this project is to assess the impact of these developed electronic indicators on supporting antibiotic stewardship efforts to improve the appropriateness of antibiotic use, as well as the acceptability and feasibility of delivering these reports to prescribers. The investigators aim to:

  1. Refine and validate indicators of appropriate antibiotic use by utilizing Electronic Health Record data, including International Classification of Diseases version 10 codes, medications, laboratory data, co-morbid medical conditions, site of care, clinical documentation, prior hospitalizations, and medication exposure. The researchers will validate the definitions of the various conditions and appropriateness captured electronically with a manual chart review of clinical documentation.
  2. Implement a scalable and sustainable antimicrobial stewardship feedback report-based intervention for these four conditions informed by a rapid user-centered design process.
  3. Track the impact of the stewardship interventions and report to key stakeholders, including prescribers.
  4. Create a publicly available toolkit based on the findings of this project that includes: (i) analytic tools and resources for using the automated reports of key indicators to target stewardship interventions and (ii) an implementation guide to inform the application of automated reports to stewardship in the inpatient and outpatient settings.

If proven effective, these electronic health record-based approaches hold the promise to greatly enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of antimicrobial stewardship initiatives.

Being tested
Quasi experimental intervention
Keywords
Antibiotic stewardship, Implementation Science, Antibiotic Use, Outpatient antibiotic prescribing, Inpatient antibiotic prescribing
Medical subject headings
Community-Acquired Pneumonia, Otitis Media, Pharyngitis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Quasi experimental interventionOther

    The intervention included clinician education and sharing of audit and feedback reports summarizing antibiotic use metrics for each of the four target conditions with treating clinicians.

Study groups in NCT06027593
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Pre-Intervention: Patients diagnosed with conditions of interest during study periodNo interventionFour population groups were included in the pre-intervention data: 1) adult inpatients with community acquired pneumonia; 2) pediatric inpatients with community acquired pneumonia; 3) adult outpatients with acute pharyngitis; and 4) pediatric outpatients with acute otitis media
Post-Intervention: Patients diagnosed with conditions of interest during study periodOtherFour population groups were included in the post-intervention data: 1) adult inpatients with community acquired pneumonia; 2) pediatric inpatients with community acquired pneumonia; 3) adult outpatients with acute pharyngitis; and 4) pediatric outpatients with acute otitis media
Receives: Other: Quasi experimental intervention

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Guideline-concordant Antibiotic Use for Adults With Pharyngitis

    Count of participants with pharyngitis with guideline-concordant antibiotic use for all three metrics (decision to prescribe an antibiotic, antibiotic choice, and antibiotic duration). The count of participants with pharyngitis with guideline-concordant antibiotic use for all three metrics was divided by the total number of participants with pharyngitis to generate the percentage of participants receiving guideline-concordant antibiotic use for all three metrics. These proportions were compared for the group of participants in the pre intervention period (1 year) and the post intervention period (1 year). There were not individual participant level measures for this outcome.

    Measured: Pre-intervention and post-intervention, up to 2 years

  2. Guideline-concordant Antibiotic Use for Children With Acute Otitis Media

    Count of participants with acute otitis media with guideline-concordant antibiotic use for all three metrics (decision to prescribe an antibiotic, antibiotic choice, and antibiotic duration). The count of participants with acute otitis media with guideline-concordant antibiotic use for all three metrics was divided by the total number of participants with pediatric acute otitis media who were prescribed antibiotics to generate the percentage of participants receiving guideline-concordant antibiotic use for all three metrics. These proportions were compared for the group of participants in the pre intervention period (1 year) and the post intervention period (1 year). There were not individual participant level measures for this outcome.

    Measured: Pre-intervention and post-intervention, up to 2 years

  3. Guideline-concordant Antibiotic Use for Adults With Community-acquired Pneumonia

    Count of participants with community-acquired pneumonia with guideline-concordant antibiotic use for all three metrics (decision to prescribe an antibiotic, antibiotic choice, and antibiotic duration). The count of participants with community-acquired pneumonia with guideline-concordant antibiotic use for all three metrics was divided by the total number of participants with community-acquired pneumonia to generate the percentage of participants receiving guideline-concordant antibiotic use for all three metrics. These proportions were compared for the group of participants in the pre intervention period (1 year) and the post intervention period (1 year). There were not individual participant level measures for this outcome.

    Measured: Pre-intervention and post-intervention, up to 2 years

  4. Guideline-concordant Antibiotic Use for Children With Community-acquired Pneumonia

    Count of participants with pediatric community-acquired pneumonia with guideline-concordant antibiotic use for all three metrics (decision to prescribe an antibiotic, antibiotic choice, and antibiotic duration). The count of participants with pediatric community-acquired pneumonia with guideline-concordant antibiotic use for all three metrics was divided by the total number of participants with pediatric community-acquired pneumonia to generate the percentage of participants receiving guideline-concordant antibiotic use for all three metrics. These proportions were compared for the group of participants in the pre intervention period (1 year) and the post intervention period (1 year). There were not individual participant level measures for this outcome.

    Measured: Pre-intervention and post-intervention, up to 2 years

Secondary outcomes (20)
  1. Guideline-concordant Antibiotic Choice for Adults Hospitalized With Community Acquired Pneumonia

    Count of participants with community-acquired pneumonia with guideline-concordant antibiotic use for antibiotic choice. The count of participants with community-acquired pneumonia with guideline-concordant antibiotic use for this metric was divided by the total number of participants with community-acquired pneumonia to generate the percentage of participants receiving guideline-concordant antibiotic use for antibiotic choice. These proportions were compared for the group of participants in the pre intervention period (1 year) and the post intervention period (1 year). There were not individual participant level measures for this outcome.

    Measured: Pre-intervention and post-intervention, up to 2 years

  2. Guideline-concordant Antibiotic Duration for Adults Hospitalized With Community Acquired Pneumonia

    Count of participants with community-acquired pneumonia with guideline-concordant antibiotic use for antibiotic duration. The count of participants with community-acquired pneumonia with guideline-concordant antibiotic use for this metric was divided by the total number of participants with community-acquired pneumonia to generate the percentage of participants receiving guideline-concordant antibiotic use for antibiotic duration. These proportions were compared for the group of participants in the pre intervention period (1 year) and the post intervention period (1 year). There were not individual participant level measures for this outcome.

    Measured: Pre-intervention and post-intervention, up to 2 years

  3. 30-day Community Acquired Pneumonia-related Outpatient Revisits (Emergency Department, Urgent Care, or Primary Care) in Adults

    Count of participants with community-acquired pneumonia with a return visit in the outpatient setting (emergency department, urgent care, or primary care) for community acquired pneumonia within 30 days of discharge following index hospitalization for adult community acquired pneumonia. The count of participants with community-acquired pneumonia with a return visit in the outpatient setting was divided by the total number of participants with community-acquired pneumonia to generate the percentage of participants with a return visit in the outpatient setting.

    Measured: 30 days

  4. 30-day Readmissions for Community Acquired Pneumonia in Adults

    Count of participants with a readmission for community-acquired pneumonia within 30 days of discharge following an index hospitalization for community-acquired pneumonia. The count of participants with a readmission for community-acquired pneumonia was divided by the total number of participants with community-acquired pneumonia to generate the percentage of participants with readmissions within 30 days of discharge following an index hospitalization for community-acquired pneumonia.

    Measured: 30 days

  5. Guideline-concordant Antibiotic Choice for Pediatric Community Acquired Pneumonia

    Count of participants with pediatric community-acquired pneumonia with guideline-concordant antibiotic use for antibiotic choice. The count of participants with pediatric community-acquired pneumonia with guideline-concordant antibiotic use for this metric was divided by the total number of participants with pediatric community-acquired pneumonia to generate the percentage of participants receiving guideline-concordant antibiotic use for antibiotic choice. These proportions were compared for the group of participants in the pre intervention period (1 year) and the post intervention period (1 year). There were not individual participant level measures for this outcome.

    Measured: Pre-intervention and post-intervention, up to 2 years

  6. Guideline-concordant Antibiotic Duration for Pediatric Community Acquired Pneumonia

    Count of participants with pediatric community-acquired pneumonia with guideline-concordant antibiotic use for antibiotic duration. The count of participants with pediatric community-acquired pneumonia with guideline-concordant antibiotic use for this metric was divided by the total number of participants with pediatric community-acquired pneumonia to generate the percentage of participants receiving guideline-concordant antibiotic use for antibiotic duration. These proportions were compared for the group of participants in the pre intervention period (1 year) and the post intervention period (1 year). There were not individual participant level measures for this outcome.

    Measured: Pre-intervention and post-intervention, up to 2 years

  7. 28-day Community Acquired Pneumonia-related Outpatient Revisits (Emergency Department, Urgent Care, or Primary Care) in Children

    Count of participants with pediatric community-acquired pneumonia with a return visit in the outpatient setting (emergency department, urgent care, or primary care) for pediatric community acquired pneumonia within 28 days of discharge following index hospitalization for pediatric community acquired pneumonia. The count of participants with pediatric community-acquired pneumonia with a return visit in the outpatient setting was divided by the total number of participants with pediatric community-acquired pneumonia to generate the percentage of participants with a return visit in the outpatient setting.

    Measured: 28 days

  8. 28-day Readmissions for Pediatric Community Acquired Pneumonia

    Count of participants with a readmission for community-acquired pneumonia within 28 days of discharge following an index hospitalization for community-acquired pneumonia. The count of participants with a readmission for community-acquired pneumonia was divided by the total number of participants with community-acquired pneumonia to generate the percentage of participants with readmissions within 28 days of discharge following an index hospitalization for community-acquired pneumonia.

    Measured: 28 days

  9. Guideline-concordant Decision to Prescribe Antibiotics for Adult Pharyngitis

    Count of participants with pharyngitis for which the decision to prescribe an antibiotic was correct. The count of participants with pharyngitis for which the decision to prescribe an antibiotic was correct was divided by the total number of participants with pharyngitis to generate the percentage of participants for which the decision to prescribe an antibiotic was correct. These proportions were compared for the group of participants in the pre intervention period (1 year) and the post intervention period (1 year). There were not individual participant level measures for this outcome.

    Measured: Pre-intervention and post-intervention, up to 2 years

  10. Guideline-concordant Antibiotic Choice Adult Pharyngitis

    Count of participants with adult pharyngitis with guideline-concordant antibiotic use for antibiotic choice. The count of participants with pharyngitis with guideline-concordant antibiotic use for this metric was divided by the total number of participants with pharyngitis to generate the percentage of participants receiving guideline-concordant antibiotic use for antibiotic choice. These proportions were compared for the group of participants in the pre intervention period (1 year) and the post intervention period (1 year). There were not individual participant level measures for this outcome.

    Measured: Pre-intervention and post-intervention, up to 2 years

  11. Guideline-concordant Antibiotic Duration for Adult Pharyngitis

    Count of participants with adult pharyngitis with guideline-concordant antibiotic use for antibiotic duration. The count of participants with pharyngitis with guideline-concordant antibiotic use for this metric was divided by the total number of participants with pharyngitis to generate the percentage of participants receiving guideline-concordant antibiotic use for antibiotic duration. These proportions were compared for the group of participants in the pre intervention period (1 year) and the post intervention period (1 year). There were not individual participant level measures for this outcome.

    Measured: Pre-intervention and post-intervention, up to 2 years

  12. 30-day Pharyngitis Outpatient Revisits (Emergency Department, Urgent Care, or Primary Care) in Adults

    Count of participants with adult pharyngitis with a return visit in the outpatient setting (emergency department, urgent care, or primary care) for pharyngitis within 30 days of discharge following index hospitalization for adult pharyngitis. The count of participants with pharyngitis with a return visit in the outpatient setting was divided by the total number of participants with pharyngitis to generate the percentage of participants with a return visit in the outpatient setting.

    Measured: 30 days

  13. 30-day Deep Neck Space Infection Admission

    Count of participants with a readmission for deep neck space infection within 30 days of index encounter for pharyngitis. The count of participants with a readmission for deep neck space infection was divided by the total number of participants with adult pharyngitis to generate the percentage of participants with readmissions for deep neck space infection within 30 days of index encounter for pharyngitis.

    Measured: 30 days

  14. Guideline-concordant Decision to Prescribe Antibiotics for Pediatric Acute Otitis Media

    Count of participants with pediatric acute otitis media for which the decision to prescribe an antibiotic was correct. The count of participants with pediatric acute otitis media for which the decision to prescribe an antibiotic was correct was divided by the total number of participants with pediatric acute otitis media to generate the percentage of participants for which the decision to prescribe an antibiotic was correct. These proportions were compared for the group of participants in the pre intervention period (1 year) and the post intervention period (1 year). There were not individual participant level measures for this outcome.

    Measured: Pre-intervention and post-intervention, up to 2 years

  15. Guideline-concordant Antibiotic Choice for Pediatric Acute Otitis Media

    Count of participants with pediatric acute otitis media with guideline-concordant antibiotic use for antibiotic choice. The count of participants with pediatric acute otitis media visits with guideline-concordant antibiotic use for this metric was divided by the total number of participants with pediatric acute otitis media who were prescribed antibiotics to generate the percentage of participants receiving guideline-concordant antibiotic use for antibiotic choice. These proportions were compared for the group of participants in the pre intervention period (1 year) and the post intervention period (1 year). There were not individual participant level measures for this outcome.

    Measured: Pre-intervention and post-intervention, up to 2 years

  16. Guideline-concordant Antibiotic Duration for Pediatric Acute Otitis Media

    Count of participants with pediatric acute otitis media with guideline-concordant antibiotic use for antibiotic duration. The count of participants with pediatric acute otitis media with guideline-concordant antibiotic use for this metric was divided by the total number of participants with pediatric acute otitis media who were prescribed antibiotics to generate the percentage of participants receiving guideline-concordant antibiotic use for antibiotic duration. These proportions were compared for the group of participants in the pre intervention period (1 year) and the post intervention period (1 year). There were not individual participant level measures for this outcome.

    Measured: Pre-intervention and post-intervention, up to 2 years

  17. 28-day Acute Otitis Media-related Outpatient Revisits (Emergency Department, Urgent Care, or Primary Care)

    Count of participants with pediatric acute otitis media with a return visit in the outpatient setting (emergency department, urgent care, or primary care) for pediatric acute otitis media within 28 days of the index acute otitis media encounter. The count of participants with pediatric acute otitis media with a return visit in the outpatient setting was divided by the total number of participants with pediatric acute otitis media to generate the percentage of participants with a return visit in the outpatient setting.

    Measured: 28 days

  18. 28-day Mastoiditis or Intracranial Infection Admissions

    Count of participants with a readmission for mastoiditis or intracranial infection within 28 days of the index encounter for pediatric acute otitis media. The count of participants with a readmission for mastoiditis or intracranial infection was divided by the total number of participants with pediatric acute otitis media to generate the percentage of participants with readmissions within 28 days of discharge following an index hospitalization for acute otitis media.

    Measured: 28 days

  19. Guideline-concordant Decision to Not Prescribe Antibiotics for Pediatric Acute Otitis Media

    Count of participants with pediatric acute otitis media with guideline-concordant antibiotic use for appropriate decision not to prescribe antibiotics. The count of participants with pediatric acute otitis media with an appropriate decision not to prescribe antibiotics was divided by the total number of participants with no antibiotics prescribed to generate the percentage of participants appropriately not prescribed antibiotics for acute otitis media. These proportions were compared for the group of participants in the pre intervention period (1 year) and the post intervention period (1 year). There were not individual participant level measures for this outcome.

    Measured: Pre-intervention and post-intervention, up to 2 years

  20. Guideline-concordant Decision to Not Prescribe Antibiotics for Adult Pharyngitis

    Count of participants with adult pharyngitis with guideline-concordant antibiotic use for appropriate decision not to prescribe antibiotics. The count of participants with adult pharyngitis with an appropriate decision not to prescribe antibiotics was divided by the total number of participants with no antibiotics prescribed to generate the percentage of participants appropriately not prescribed antibiotics for pharyngitis. These proportions were compared for the group of participants in the pre intervention period (1 year) and the post intervention period (1 year). There were not individual participant level measures for this outcome.

    Measured: Pre-intervention and post-intervention, up to 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Sep 2023
  2. Study start18 Oct 2022
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2024
  4. Study completion31 Jul 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
Quasi-experimental study measuring the impact of an antibiotic stewardship intervention consisting of clinician education and audit and feedback reports on antibiotic use for adult inpatients with community acquired pneumonia, pediatric inpatients with community acquired pneumonia, adult outpatients with acute pharyngitis, and pediatric outpatients with acute otitis media.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
26,139 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06027593
Sponsor's protocol ID
22-019749
Other IDs
75D30121F00002, 850722, 851400
Acronym
EMPOWER
Status last verified
Oct 2025
First submitted
14 Aug 2023
Last updated
14 Nov 2025
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: This study was initiated prior to the NIH Data Management and Sharing Policy update that was released on January 25, 2023.

Publications

  • Gerber JS, Newland JG, Coffin SE, Hall M, Thurm C, Prasad PA, Feudtner C, Zaoutis TE. Variability in antibiotic use at children's hospitals. Pediatrics. 2010 Dec;126(6):1067-73. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-1275. Epub 2010 Nov 15.

    PubMed 21078728
  • Polk RE, Hohmann SF, Medvedev S, Ibrahim O. Benchmarking risk-adjusted adult antibacterial drug use in 70 US academic medical center hospitals. Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Dec;53(11):1100-10. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir672. Epub 2011 Oct 13.

    PubMed 21998281
  • Roberts RM, Hicks LA, Bartoces M. Variation in US outpatient antibiotic prescribing quality measures according to health plan and geography. Am J Manag Care. 2016 Aug;22(8):519-23.

    PubMed 27541698
  • Hicks LA, Bartoces MG, Roberts RM, Suda KJ, Hunkler RJ, Taylor TH Jr, Schrag SJ. US outpatient antibiotic prescribing variation according to geography, patient population, and provider specialty in 2011. Clin Infect Dis. 2015 May 1;60(9):1308-16. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ076. Epub 2015 Mar 5.

    PubMed 25747410
  • Barnett ML, Linder JA. Antibiotic prescribing for adults with acute bronchitis in the United States, 1996-2010. JAMA. 2014 May 21;311(19):2020-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.286141. No abstract available.

    PubMed 24846041
  • Barnett ML, Linder JA. Antibiotic prescribing to adults with sore throat in the United States, 1997-2010. JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jan;174(1):138-40. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.11673. No abstract available.

    PubMed 24091806
  • Fairlie T, Shapiro DJ, Hersh AL, Hicks LA. National trends in visit rates and antibiotic prescribing for adults with acute sinusitis. Arch Intern Med. 2012 Oct 22;172(19):1513-4. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.4089. No abstract available.

    PubMed 23007315
  • Fleming-Dutra KE, Hersh AL, Shapiro DJ, Bartoces M, Enns EA, File TM Jr, Finkelstein JA, Gerber JS, Hyun DY, Linder JA, Lynfield R, Margolis DJ, May LS, Merenstein D, Metlay JP, Newland JG, Piccirillo JF, Roberts RM, Sanchez GV, Suda KJ, Thomas A, Woo TM, Zetts RM, Hicks LA. Prevalence of Inappropriate Antibiotic Prescriptions Among US Ambulatory Care Visits, 2010-2011. JAMA. 2016 May 3;315(17):1864-73. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.4151.

    PubMed 27139059
  • Dellit TH, Owens RC, McGowan JE Jr, Gerding DN, Weinstein RA, Burke JP, Huskins WC, Paterson DL, Fishman NO, Carpenter CF, Brennan PJ, Billeter M, Hooton TM; Infectious Diseases Society of America; Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America guidelines for developing an institutional program to enhance antimicrobial stewardship. Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Jan 15;44(2):159-77. doi: 10.1086/510393. Epub 2006 Dec 13. No abstract available.

    PubMed 17173212
  • Gerber JS, Grundmeier R, Hamilton KW, Hicks L, Neuhauser M, Frager N, Menon M, Kratz E, Jaskowiak A, Cressman L, James T, Omorogbe J, Lautenbach E. Development of an Electronic Algorithm to Identify Inappropriate Antibiotic Prescribing for Pediatric Pharyngitis. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 2020;41 (S1):S188-189

  • Gerber JS, Grundmeier R, Hamilton KW, Hicks L, Neuhauser M, Frager N, Menon M, Kratz E, Jaskowiak A, Cressman L, James T, Omorogbe J, Lautenbach E. An Electronic Algorithm to Better Target Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) Efforts for Children Hospitalized with Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP). Open Forum Infectious Diseases. 2020;7 (S1):S85-86

  • Lautenbach E, Hamilton KW, Grundmeier R, Neuhauser MM, Hicks LA, Jaskowiak-Barr A, Cressman L, James T, Omorogbe J, Frager N, Menon M, Kratz E, Dutcher L, Chiotos K, Gerber JS. Development of an Electronic Algorithm to Target Outpatient Antimicrobial Stewardship Efforts for Acute Bronchitis and Pharyngitis. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Jun 6;9(7):ofac273. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac273. eCollection 2022 Jul.

    PubMed 35854991
  • Lautenbach E, Hamilton KH, Grundmeier R, Neuhauser M, Hicks L, Jaskowiak A, Cressman L, James T, Omorogbe J, Frager N, Menon M, Kratz E, Gerber JS. Construction of an Electronic Algorithm to Efficiently Target Antimicrobial Stewardship Efforts for Adults Hospitalized with Community-acquired Pneumonia. Open Forum Infectious Diseases. 2020;7 (S1):S175-176

  • Meeker D, Linder JA, Fox CR, Friedberg MW, Persell SD, Goldstein NJ, Knight TK, Hay JW, Doctor JN. Effect of Behavioral Interventions on Inappropriate Antibiotic Prescribing Among Primary Care Practices: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016 Feb 9;315(6):562-70. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0275.

    PubMed 26864410
  • Charani E, Ahmad R, Rawson TM, Castro-Sanchez E, Tarrant C, Holmes AH. The Differences in Antibiotic Decision-making Between Acute Surgical and Acute Medical Teams: An Ethnographic Study of Culture and Team Dynamics. Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Jun 18;69(1):12-20. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy844.

    PubMed 30445453

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Quasi experimental intervention in people with Community-acquired Pneumonia and Acute Otitis Media, run by Children's Hospital of Philadelphia at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Nov 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 Nov 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Guideline-concordant Antibiotic Use for Adults With Pharyngitis (time frame: Pre-intervention and post-intervention, up to 2 years). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06027593, which also lists 22 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Nov 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in