Breast CancerCOG STIM 2NCT06027632
Remotely Supervised Computerized Cognitive Stimulation to Reduce Post-chemotherapy Cognitive Difficulties in Patients Treated for Localized Breast Cancer
A study testing Cognitive exercises with supervision and Cognitive exercises without supervision in people with Breast Cancer and Cognitive Dysfunction, run by Centre Francois Baclesse at 25 sites in France.
Trial summary
Investigator propose the first French randomized comparative study to assess the efficacy of a remotely supervised online cognitive stimulation program, compared to an unsupervised online cognitive exercise intervention, in reducing cognitive complaints in localized breast cancer patients after adjuvant chemotherapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 months and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer, Cognitive Dysfunction
- What is being tested?
- Cognitive exercises with supervision and Cognitive exercises without supervision
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 300 participants
- Where
- 25 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 9 Feb 2024to Mar 2029
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 months and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient diagnosed with localized breast cancer
- Age 18 or older,
- Who have received adjuvant or neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and are currently undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy (ongoing hormone therapy, maintenance therapy other as target therapies or immunotherapy are permitted) until 6 months after end of radiotherapy.
- Patients who report cognitive complaints that significantly impact their quality of life, as evaluated by the quality of life subscale of the FACT-Cog questionnaire. This subscale is composed by 4 questions:
- I have been upset about these problems;
- These problems have interfered with my ability to work;
Show all 16Show fewer
- These problems have interfered with my ability to do things I enjoy;
- These problems have interfered with the quality of my life.
- Patients are eligible if their score on this subscale is at or below the 10th percentile, based on age guidelines and normative data (Lange et al., 2015), namely:
- ≤ 8 for patients aged 30-49 years
- ≤ 9 for patients aged 50-69 years
- ≤ 10 for patients aged 70-89 years
- Patients who have completed at least three years of primary school education, as determined by the Barbizet scale,
- Patient with access to a functional laptop/computer with a keyboard, internet connection and an e-mail account - being able to use those tools alone,
- Fluent in French,
- Patients who have provided informed consent to participate in the study.
Who cannot join
- Personality disorder or any known progressive psychiatric pathology (e.g. schizophrenia),
- Previous neurological history with ongoing cognitive symptoms (sequelae of head trauma, stroke, multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, neurodegenerative pathology, etc.),
- Excessive alcohol intake or drug use, which could compromise participation to the intervention
- Major visual and/or hearing deficit,
- Patient who might not be able to complete neuropsychological testing, (including those with significant cognitive disorders that impede the completion of cognition tests, as determined by the cognitive screening test MoCA (MONTREAL COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT) and based on age and educational level according to GRECOGVASC (Reflection Group for Vascular COGnitive Assessment) normative data)
- Already participating in a cognitive training program,
Show all 9Show fewer
- Refusal to participate,
- Patient deprived of liberty or under guardianship,
- Patient who might not be able to participate due to geographic, social or psychopathological reasons.
Trial locations and contacts
25 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
25 sites in 1 country
France25 sites, 25 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord Aquitaine
Bordeaux
Nadine DOHOLLOU, MD
Nadine DOHOLLOU, MD
- Recruiting
Centre hospitalier de Bligny
Briis-sous-Forges
Jean-Baptiste MERIC, MD, 33686961024, jb.meric@chbligny.fr
Jean-Baptiste MERIC, MD
- Recruiting
Centre François Baclesse
Caen, 14000
Florence JOLY, PhD, +33 2 31 45 50 50, f.joly@baclesse.unicancer.fr
Jean-Michel GRELLARD, +33 2 31 45 50 50, jm.grellard@baclesse.unicancer.fr
- Recruiting
CH Métropole Savoie
Chambéry
Cécile AGOSTINI, MD, 33479968951, cecile.agostini-esnault@ch-metropole-savoie.fr
Cécile AGOSTINI, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Centre Jean Perrin
Clermont-Ferrand
Christine VILLATTE-DE FIGUEIREDO, MD
Christine VILLATTE-DE FIGUEIREDO, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Centre George François Leclerc
Dijon
Didier MAYEUR, MD
Didier MAYEUR, MD
- Recruiting
Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste de Grenoble
Grenoble
Olivia DIAZ, MD, +33476707308, olivia.diaz@avec.fr
Olivia DIAZ, MD
- Recruiting
CHU de Limoges
Limoges
Elodie DELUCHE, MD, 33555056100, elise.deluche@chu-limoges.fr
Elodie DELUCHE, MD
- Recruiting
Centre Léon Bérard
Lyon
Benoite MERY, MD, 33478782644, benoite.mery@lyon.unicancer.fr
Benoite MERY, MD
- Recruiting
Institut Paoli Calmettes
Marseille
Lorene SEGUIN, MD, 33491223789 ext. seguinl@ipc.un, seguinl@ipc.unicancer.fr
Lorene SEGUIN, MD
- Recruiting
ICM Val d'Aurelle
Montpellier
Estelle GUERDOUX, 33467612468, estelle.guerdoux@icm.unicancer.fr
Estelle GUERDOUX
- Not yet recruiting
Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine
Nancy
Camille SIMON, MD
Camille SIMON, MD
- Recruiting
Hôpital privé du Confluent
Nantes
Dorothée CHOCTEAU-BOUJU, MD, 33228272236, dchocteau@vivalto-sante.com
Dorothée CHOCTEAU-BOUJU, MD
- Recruiting
Centre Antoine Lacassagne
Nice
Flora COURTAULT-DESLANDES, MD, 33492031623, Flora.COURTAULT-DESLANDES@nice.unicancer.fr
Flora COURTAULT-DESLANDES, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Clinique Haute Energie
Nice
Nathalie PINTO, MD, 33493538700, nathalie.pinto@che-nice.com
Nathalie PINTO, MD
- Recruiting
CHU de Nimes
Nîmes
Frederic FITENI, MD, +33466683301, frederic.fiteni@chu-nimes.fr
Frederic FITENI, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Hôpital Saint-Louis
Paris
Leonor DROUIN, MD
Leonor DROUIN, MD
- Not yet recruiting
La Pitié Salpétrière
Paris
Johanna WASSERMANN, MD
Johanna WASSERMANN, MD
- Recruiting
Centre hospitalier de Pau
Pau
Kevin BOURCIER, MD, 33559726796, kevin.bourcier@ch-pau.fr
Kevin BOURCIER, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Centre Arrmoricain d'Oncologie
Plérin
Jérôme MARTIN-BABAU, MD
Jérôme MARTIN-BABAU, MD
- Recruiting
Centre Eugène Marquis
Rennes
Claudia LEFEUVRE-PLESSE, MD, 33299254414, c.lefeuvre@rennes.unicancer.fr
Claudia LEFEUVRE-PLESSE, MD
- Recruiting
Centre Henri Becquerel
Rouen
Olivier RIGAL, MD, 33232082501, olivier.rigal@chb.unicancer.fr
Olivier RIGAL, MD
- Recruiting
Clinique Mathilde
Rouen
Marine CABOURG, MD, 33665418269, mcabourg@vivalto-sante.com
Marine CABOURG, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Clinique Medico-chirurgicale Charcot
Sainte-Foy-lès-Lyon
Nicolas CARRABIN, MD, 334 72 32 31 98, docteur.carrabin@gmail.com
Nicolas CARRABIN, MD
- Recruiting
Gustave Roussy
Villejuif
Antonio DI MEGLIO, MD, +33142113503, antonio.di-meglio@gustaveroussy.fr
Antonio DI MEGLIO, MD
About this study
Official title: Remotely Supervised Computerized Cognitive Stimulation to Reduce Post-chemotherapy Cognitive Difficulties in Patients Treated for Localized Breast Cancer: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Investigator propose the first French randomized comparative study to assess the efficacy of a remotely supervised online cognitive stimulation program, compared to an unsupervised online cognitive exercise intervention, in reducing cognitive complaints in localized breast cancer patients after adjuvant chemotherapy. Previous randomized studies have confirmed the effectiveness of online cognitive stimulation programs compared to standard care. The study seeks to determine the added value of remote supervision by a neuropsychologist. The control group will have access to the same online cognitive exercises as the experimental group but without supervision. Investigator has chosen not to include a wait-list group as it would be unethical to deny patients with cognitive complaints the opportunity to participate in an intervention expected to benefit them. The secondary objective is to evaluate the benefit of the supervised digitalized cognitive intervention on objective cognitive impairment.
The research hypothesis is that incorporating personalized remote support with supervision from a neuropsychologist into a digitalized cognitive stimulation program will reinforce the effectiveness of the intervention on cognitive complaints. This will be achieved by improving participation/adherence to the online cognitive stimulation program, as well as through the personalized supervision itself. Investigator believe that the supervision sessions, including educational components, will enable patients to identify their strengths, promote their cognitive awareness, and develop individualized strategies to apply their compensatory abilities in real-life situations. Since cognitive difficulties have multiple underlying causes, reducing these symptoms requires a multifaceted approach. The hypothesis is that combining cognitive training (which increases neuroplasticity and directly targets the cognitive domains affected by cancer and its treatments), with structured supervised educational sessions based on compensatory strategies, will yield better outcomes than online cognitive stimulation alone.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer, Cognitive Dysfunction
- Being tested
- Cognitive exercises with supervision, Cognitive exercises without supervision
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms, Cognitive Dysfunction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cognitive exercises with supervisionOther
The experimental group will receive a 12-week intervention consisting of three 20-minute online cognitive stimulation sessions per week along with a weekly 30-minute centralized online remote supervision session with a neuropsychologist. Patient will also have access to the "PRESCO" program of the "HAPPYNeuron-Pro" software, which is designed to train up to 12 different cognitive domains, including attention, memory, executive functions and processing speed
Cognitive exercises without supervisionOther
Patient will have access to the program named "PRESCO" of the "HAPPYNeuron-Pro" software, which is designed to train up to 12 different cognitive domains, including attention, memory, executive functions and processing speed
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Remotely-supervised online cognitive stimulation intervention | Other | Not described Receives: Other: Cognitive exercises with supervision |
| Open access to online home-based cognitive exercises without supervision | Other | Not described Receives: Other: Cognitive exercises without supervision |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Average change in the score of the Perceived Cognitive Impairment (PCI) subscale score of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function (FACT-Cog)
Perceived Cognitive Impairment (PCI) score range 0-72 (The higher the score, the fewer cognitive complaints)
Measured: After 12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Sep 2023
- Study start9 Feb 2024
- Primary completionJun 2028 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Francois Baclesse
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- UNICANCER
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06027632
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2023-A01134-41
- Acronym
- COG STIM 2
- Status last verified
- Apr 2025
- First submitted
- 31 Aug 2023
- Last updated
- 19 Sep 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Bousquet M, Lange M, Lequesne J, Durand-Zaleski I, Diaz O, Di Meglio A, Bachelot T, Grellard JM, Clarisse B, Joly F. Remotely supervised online cognitive training to reduce cognitive difficulties following chemotherapy in patients treated for localized breast cancer: Protocol of the Cog-Stim2 multicenter randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2025 Nov 13;20(11):e0335124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0335124. eCollection 2025.
PubMed 41231878
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Sep 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Remotely Supervised Computerized Cognitive Stimulation to Reduce Post-chemotherapy Cognitive Difficulties in Patients Treated for Localized Breast Cancer: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06027632
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- COG STIM 2 / 2023-A01134-41
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer, Cognitive Dysfunction
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Francois BaclesseUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- UNICANCER
- Study start
- 9 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 7 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Investigator propose the first French randomized comparative study to assess the efficacy of a remotely supervised online cognitive stimulation program, compared to an unsupervised online cognitive exercise intervention, in reducing cognitive complaints in localized breast cancer patients after adjuvant chemotherapy. Previous randomized studies have confirmed the effectiveness of online cognitive stimulation programs compared to standard care. The study seeks to determine the added value of remote supervision by a neuropsychologist. The control group will have access to the same online cognitive exercises as the experimental group but without supervision. Investigator has chosen not to include a wait-list group as it would be unethical to deny patients with cognitive complaints the opportunity to participate in an intervention expected to benefit them. The secondary objective is to evaluate the benefit of the supervised digitalized cognitive intervention on objective cognitive impairment.
The research hypothesis is that incorporating personalized remote support with supervision from a neuropsychologist into a digitalized cognitive stimulation program will reinforce the effectiveness of the intervention on cognitive complaints. This will be achieved by improving participation/adherence to the online cognitive stimulation program, as well as through the personalized supervision itself. Investigator believe that the supervision sessions, including educational components, will enable patients to identify their strengths, promote their cognitive awareness, and develop individualized strategies to apply their compensatory abilities in real-life situations. Since cognitive difficulties have multiple underlying causes, reducing these symptoms requires a multifaceted approach. The hypothesis is that combining cognitive training (which increases neuroplasticity and directly targets the cognitive domains affected by cancer and its treatments), with structured supervised educational sessions based on compensatory strategies, will yield better outcomes than online cognitive stimulation alone.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Remotely-supervised online cognitive stimulation intervention | Other | Other: Cognitive exercises with supervision |
| Open access to online home-based cognitive exercises without supervision | Other | Other: Cognitive exercises without supervision |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 months and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Patient diagnosed with localized breast cancer
- Age 18 or older,
- Who have received adjuvant or neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and are currently undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy (ongoing hormone therapy, maintenance therapy other as target therapies or immunotherapy are permitted) until 6 months after end of radiotherapy.
- Patients who report cognitive complaints that significantly impact their quality of life, as evaluated by the quality of life subscale of the FACT-Cog questionnaire. This subscale is composed by 4 questions:
- Patients are eligible if their score on this subscale is at or below the 10th percentile, based on age guidelines and normative data (Lange et al., 2015), namely:
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Personality disorder or any known progressive psychiatric pathology (e.g. schizophrenia),
- Previous neurological history with ongoing cognitive symptoms (sequelae of head trauma, stroke, multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, neurodegenerative pathology, etc.),
- Excessive alcohol intake or drug use, which could compromise participation to the intervention
- Major visual and/or hearing deficit,
- Patient who might not be able to complete neuropsychological testing, (including those with significant cognitive disorders that impede the completion of cognition tests, as determined by the cognitive screening test MoCA (MONTREAL COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT) and based on age and educational level according to GRECOGVASC (Reflection Group for Vascular COGnitive Assessment) normative data)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive exercises with supervisionThe experimental group will receive a 12-week intervention consisting of three 20-minute online cognitive stimulation sessions per week along with a weekly 30-minute centralized online remote supervision session with a neuropsychologist. Patient will also have access to the "PRESCO" program of the "HAPPYNeuron-Pro" software, which is designed to train up to 12 different cognitive domains, including attention, memory, executive functions and processing speed | Other | Remotely-supervised online cognitive stimulation intervention |
| Cognitive exercises without supervisionPatient will have access to the program named "PRESCO" of the "HAPPYNeuron-Pro" software, which is designed to train up to 12 different cognitive domains, including attention, memory, executive functions and processing speed | Other | Open access to online home-based cognitive exercises without supervision |
Primary outcome
Average change in the score of the Perceived Cognitive Impairment (PCI) subscale score of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function (FACT-Cog)
Time frame: After 12 weeks
Perceived Cognitive Impairment (PCI) score range 0-72 (The higher the score, the fewer cognitive complaints)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Sep 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41231878Bousquet M, Lange M, Lequesne J, Durand-Zaleski I, Diaz O, Di Meglio A, Bachelot T, Grellard JM, Clarisse B, Joly F. Remotely supervised online cognitive training to reduce cognitive difficulties following chemotherapy in patients treated for localized breast cancer: Protocol of the Cog-Stim2 multicenter randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2025 Nov 13;20(11):e0335124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0335124. eCollection 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Breast Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Tamoxifen Citrate or Z-Endoxifen Hydrochloride in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic, Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer
Recurrent Breast Carcinoma, Stage III Breast Cancer AJCC v7
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study to Evaluate the Effect of GDC-4198 Alone and in Combination With Giredestrant Versus Abemaciclib and Giredestrant in Participants With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Estrogen Receptor-Positive (ER+), Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Negative (HER2-) Breast Cancer
Breast Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Podcast-Based Psychosocial Support for Women Newly Diagnosed With Breast Cancer
Breast Cancer
Recruiting
A Study of Skipping Radiation Therapy in People With Breast Cancer
HER2-positive Breast Cancer, Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Dance Study for Post-surgical Pain in Breast Cancer Survivors
Breast Cancer, Survivorship
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
25 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Cognitive exercises with supervision and Cognitive exercises without supervision in people with Breast Cancer and Cognitive Dysfunction, run by Centre Francois Baclesse at 25 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 16 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 25 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Average change in the score of the Perceived Cognitive Impairment (PCI) subscale score of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function (FACT-Cog) (time frame: After 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06027632, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Sep 2025.