AzTrials
AzTrials

DeliriumEMPRONCT06027788

CTSN Embolic Protection Trial

A study testing CardioGard Embolic Protection Cannula and Standard Aortic Cannula in people with Delirium and Ischemic Stroke, run by Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai at 24 sites in 2 countries.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a prospective, multi-center, randomized effectiveness trial of the CardioGard Embolic Protection Cannula in high-risk valve surgery patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 60 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Delirium, Ischemic Stroke, Acute Kidney Injury
What is being tested?
CardioGard Embolic Protection Cannula and Standard Aortic Cannula
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
842 participants
Where
24 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
18 Sep 2023to 1 Apr 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 60 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 60 years
  • Planned de novo or redo:
  • Surgical aortic valve replacement SAVR ± ascending aortic repair (if circulatory arrest is not required) ± CABG
  • Mitral valve replacement (MVR) ± CABG
  • Mitral Valve Repair + CABG,
  • Double/Triple valve surgery ± CABG; Ross procedure These procedures can be done via a full or minimal-access sternotomy (using central aortic perfusion cannulae) with legally marketed valve(s), and can be done in combination with an left atrial appendage (LAA) closure/excision or partial/complete Maze procedure.
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Valve sparing aortic root replacement (David procedure)
  • Valve sparing aortic root replacement (David procedure)
  • No evidence of neurological impairment as defined by a NIHSS ≤1 and modified Rankin scale (mRS) ≤2 within 30 days prior to randomization
  • Ability to provide informed consent and comply with the protocol

Who cannot join

  • History of clinical stroke within 3 months prior to randomization
  • Cerebral and or aortic arch arteriography or interventions within 3 days of the planned procedure
  • Coronary catheterization within 3 days of index procedure, and the required repeat NIHSS score post-catheterization is worse than the screening/baseline NIHSS score conducted prior to the catheterization
  • Active endocarditis at time of randomization with vegetation criteria
  • Clinical signs of cardiogenic shock or treatment with IV inotropic therapy prior to randomization
  • Participation in an interventional (drug or device) trial
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Isolated mitral valve repair, isolated tricuspid valve repair or combined mitral valve repair and tricuspid valve repair
  • Anticipated requirement for prolonged mechanical ventilation greater than 48 hours after surgery in the opinion of the investigator
  • Planned concomitant carotid endarterectomy during index surgical procedure

Trial locations and contacts

24 sites in 2 countries.

24 sites in 2 countries

United States20 sites
  • University of Michigan

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109

  • Emory University

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30322

  • Johns Hopkins Medicine

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21287

  • Massachusetts General Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

  • University of Virginia

    Charlottesville, Virginia, 22903

  • University of Cincinnati Medical Center

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267

  • Cleveland Clinic

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44195

  • University of Maryland

    College Park, Maryland, 20742

  • Duke University

    Durham, North Carolina, 27710

  • Saint Luke's Hospital of Kansas City

    Kansas City, Missouri, 64111

  • Keck Hospital of the University of Southern California

    Los Angeles, California, 90033

  • West Virginia University

    Morgantown, West Virginia, 26506

  • Ochsner Clinic

    New Orleans, Louisiana, 70506

  • Columbia University Medical Center

    New York, New York, 10032

  • Northwell Health

    New York, New York, 21287

  • CHI St. Vincent Heart Institute

    North Little Rock, Arkansas, 72117

  • Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

  • Maine Medical Center

    Portland, Maine, 04102

  • Mayo Clinic

    Rochester, Minnesota, 55905

  • Montefiore Medical Center

    The Bronx, New York, 10467

Other trials in United States

Canada4 sites
  • London Health Sciences Centre

    London, Ontario

  • Montreal Heart Institute

    Montreal, Quebec

  • University of Ottawa Heart Institute

    Ottawa, Ontario

  • Hôpital Laval

    Québec, Quebec, QC G1V 4G5

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Embolic Protection in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Valve Surgery

This is a prospective, multi-center, randomized effectiveness trial of the CardioGard Embolic Protection Cannula in high-risk valve surgery patients.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial that will evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the CardioGard embolic protection cannula compared to a standard cannula. The enrollment period is expected to last 30 months, and all patients will be followed for 12 months post procedure.

RANDOMIZATION Patients will be randomized 1:1 to the embolic protection device or to a standard cannula in the operating room (OR) immediately after sternotomy and confirmation by the surgical team of the patient's suitability for the proposed intervention (CardioGard embolic protection device). Randomization will be with equal allocation and stratified by site and by procedure (i.e., isolated valve surgery or combined procedures, such as double valve or valve plus coronary artery bypass grafting, CABG). The randomization assignment will be controlled centrally and performed through a web-based data collection system that automates the delivery of the randomization codes. From the point of treatment assignment, primary efficacy will be analyzed by intention-to-treat; that is, the patients will be grouped by their assignments at randomization regardless of whether or not they actually received the treatment to which they were assigned.

STUDY POPULATION The patient population for this trial consists of patients age ≥ 60 undergoing different types of valve surgery with or without CABG via full or minimal-access sternotomy using legally marketed valve(s). Specific inclusion and exclusion criteria are listed below. All patients who meet the eligibility criteria may be included in the study regardless of gender, race, or ethnicity.

SUBSTUDY Sleep Disturbance Ancillary Sub-Study - Patients undergoing surgery for valvular heart disease (VHD) are at high risk for adverse events, including high rates of post-operative delirium (POD). Should circadian disruption be found to be an important predictor in this high-risk population, safe, low cost, and easy to administer therapies to regulate circadian rhythm such as light therapy could be evaluated in future studies

The aims of this ancillary sub-study include:

  1. To investigate the association between short sleep duration, less sleep regularity, and greater circadian rhythm disruption prior to surgery and POD within 7 days of VHD surgery.
  2. To investigate the association between short sleep duration, less sleep regularity and greater circadian rhythm disruption (reduced melatonin and cortisol amplitudes) after surgery and POD within 7 days of VHD surgery.

Approximately 300 EMPRO trial participants will be enrolled into the ancillary study. The study is being conducted in highly experienced clinical centers in the U.S. and Canada. The estimated enrollment period is 12-15 months.

All eligible and consented patients in the parent EMPRO trial will be offered enrollment in this ancillary study through the parent trial consent process.

Being tested
CardioGard Embolic Protection Cannula, Standard Aortic Cannula
Keywords
Embolic Protection, Cardiac Surgery, CardioGard
Medical subject headings
Delirium, Ischemic Stroke, Acute Kidney Injury, Heart Valve Diseases, Coronary Artery Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CardioGard Embolic Protection CannulaDevice

    The CardioGard embolic protection cannula is a device that combines the function of a standard aortic cannula with an added suction mechanism to capture debris that may result from cardiac surgery. The device is comprised of 2 hollow tubes. The first tube is the standard main forward-flow tube to return oxygenated blood to the patient's aorta. The second tube attached to an existing bypass vent port, is a novel element located posteriorly to the main tube; its function is to facilitate blood and particle suction by directing the blood back to the reservoir of the coronary bypass machine, while the retrieved embolic debris is eliminated through the filter of the venous reservoir.

  • Standard Aortic CannulaDevice

    An aortic cannula is a device that is used routinely during cardiac surgery to return oxygenated blood from the cardiac bypass machine into the patient's aorta.

Study groups in NCT06027788
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CardioGard Embolic Protection CannulaActive comparatorIn patients assigned to the embolic protection device group, the CardioGard Embolic Protection Cannula is used instead, according to the manufacturer's instructions for use (IFU).
Receives: Device: CardioGard Embolic Protection Cannula
Standard Aortic CannulaPlacebo comparatorIn patients assigned to the standard cannula group, standard cannulation techniques are performed using any standard aortic cannula of the surgeon's choice
Receives: Device: Standard Aortic Cannula

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of patients who experience ischemic stroke and Acute Kidney Injury (AKI)

    The combined number of patients who experience clinical ischemic strokes and acute kidney injuries that have occurred within 3 days post-randomization.

    Measured: within 3 days post-randomization

  2. Number of patients who experience of death and delirium

    The combined number of patients who experience death and delirium by 7 days post-randomization (with a blanking period for delirium of days 1 and 2 post-operatively).

    Measured: by 7 days post-randomization

Secondary outcomes (38)
  1. Proportion of patients who experience a clinical ischemic stroke

    The proportion of patients who experience a clinical ischemic stroke within 3 days will be compared between the two groups (i.e., standard cannula versus the CardioGard device).

    Measured: within 3 days post-randomization

  2. Proportion of patients who experience a clinical ischemic stroke

    The proportion of patients who experience a clinical ischemic stroke within 7 days will be compared between the two groups (i.e., standard cannula versus the CardioGard device).

    Measured: within 7 days post-randomization

  3. Number of patients with disabling clinical stroke

    Number of patients with disabling clinical stroke within 3 days post-randomization

    Measured: within 3 days post-randomization

  4. Number of patients with disabling clinical stroke

    Number of patients with disabling clinical stroke within 7 days post-randomization

    Measured: within 7 days post-randomization

  5. Neurological outcomes assessed by National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)

    Neurological outcomes are assessed by National Institutes of Health stroke Scale (NIHSS) to compare the treatment outcomes of three types of service delivery models. The NIHSS is an 11-item impairment scale to evaluate neurologic outcome and degree of recovery.

    Each item is scored between 0 and up to 4, total score ranges 0 (normal function) and a maximum possible score 42, with higher score indicating higher level of impairment.

    These assessments will be administered by blinded neurology trainees or study coordinators who are certified to administer the assessments.

    Measured: within 3 days post-randomization

  6. Neurological outcomes assessed by National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)

    Neurological outcomes are assessed by National Institutes of Health stroke Scale (NIHSS) to compare the treatment outcomes of three types of service delivery models. The NIHSS is an 11-item impairment scale to evaluate neurologic outcome and degree of recovery.

    Each item is scored between 0 and up to 4, total score ranges 0 (normal function) and a maximum possible score 42, with higher score indicating higher level of impairment.

    These assessments will be administered by blinded neurology trainees or study coordinators who are certified to administer the assessments.

    Measured: within 7 days post-randomization

  7. Number of patients with disabling clinical stroke determined by modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≥2

    Number of patients with disabling clinical stroke as indicated by mRS score ≥2. mRS will be assessed at baseline days.

    The scale runs from 0-6, running from perfect health without symptoms to death. A higher score indicates greater impairment.

    0 - No symptoms.

    1. - No significant disability. Able to carry out all usual activities, despite some symptoms.
    2. - Slight disability. Able to look after own affairs without assistance, but unable to carry out all previous activities.
    3. - Moderate disability. Requires some help, but able to walk unassisted. 4 - Moderately severe disability. Unable to walk and attend own bodily needs without assistance.

    5 - Severe disability. Requires constant nursing care and attention, bedridden, incontinent.

    6 - Dead.

    Measured: at baseline

  8. Number of patients with disabling clinical stroke determined by modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≥2

    Number of patients with disabling clinical stroke as indicated by mRS score ≥2. mRS will be assessed at 30 days.

    The scale runs from 0-6, running from perfect health without symptoms to death. A higher score indicates greater impairment.

    0 - No symptoms.

    1. - No significant disability. Able to carry out all usual activities, despite some symptoms.
    2. - Slight disability. Able to look after own affairs without assistance, but unable to carry out all previous activities.
    3. - Moderate disability. Requires some help, but able to walk unassisted. 4 - Moderately severe disability. Unable to walk and attend own bodily needs without assistance.

    5 - Severe disability. Requires constant nursing care and attention, bedridden, incontinent.

    6 - Dead.

    Measured: at 30 days

  9. Number of patients with disabling clinical stroke determined by modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≥2

    Number of patients with disabling clinical stroke as indicated by mRS score ≥2. mRS will be assessed at 90 days.

    The scale runs from 0-6, running from perfect health without symptoms to death. A higher score indicates greater impairment.

    0 - No symptoms.

    1. - No significant disability. Able to carry out all usual activities, despite some symptoms.
    2. - Slight disability. Able to look after own affairs without assistance, but unable to carry out all previous activities.
    3. - Moderate disability. Requires some help, but able to walk unassisted. 4 - Moderately severe disability. Unable to walk and attend own bodily needs without assistance.

    5 - Severe disability. Requires constant nursing care and attention, bedridden, incontinent.

    6 - Dead.

    Measured: at 90 days

  10. Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Score

    Global cognitive screening performance will be compared between groups and collected via the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) - blind version at presurgical baseline.

    The MoCA scale is used for detecting cognitive impairment. The scores range between 0 to 30 points; a score of 26 or above was considered normal. Higher values represent a better outcome.

    Measured: at baseline

  11. Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Score

    Global cognitive screening performance will be compared between groups and collected via the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) - blind version at 90 days.

    The MoCA scale is used for detecting cognitive impairment. The scores range between 0 to 30 points; a score of 26 or above is considered normal. Higher values represent a better outcome.

    Measured: at 90 days

  12. Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Score

    Global cognitive screening performance will be compared between groups and collected via the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) - blind version at 12 months.

    The MoCA scale is used for detecting cognitive impairment. The scores range between 0 to 30 points; a score of 26 or above is considered normal. Higher values represent a better outcome.

    Measured: at 12 months

  13. Oral Trail Making Test - Parts A and B (executive function)

    The Trail Making Test consists of 25 circles distributed over a sheet of paper. In Part A, the circles are numbered 1 - 25, and the patient should draw lines to connect the numbers in ascending order. In Part B, the circles include both numbers (1 - 13) and letters (A - L); as in Part A, the patient draws lines to connect the circles in an ascending pattern, but with the added task of alternating between the numbers and letters (i.e., 1-A-2-B-3-C, etc.). The patient should be instructed to connect the circles as quickly as possible, without lifting the pen or pencil from the paper. Time the patient connects the "trail." If the patient makes an error, point it out immediately and allow the patient to correct it. Results for part B are reported as the number of seconds required to complete the task; therefore, higher scores reveal greater impairment.

    Measured: at baseline

  14. Oral Trail Making Test - Parts A and B (executive function)

    The Trail Making Test consists of 25 circles distributed over a sheet of paper. In Part A, the circles are numbered 1 - 25, and the patient should draw lines to connect the numbers in ascending order. In Part B, the circles include both numbers (1 - 13) and letters (A - L); as in Part A, the patient draws lines to connect the circles in an ascending pattern, but with the added task of alternating between the numbers and letters (i.e., 1-A-2-B-3-C, etc.). The patient should be instructed to connect the circles as quickly as possible, without lifting the pen or pencil from the paper. Time the patient connects the "trail." If the patient makes an error, point it out immediately and allow the patient to correct it. Results for part B are reported as the number of seconds required to complete the task; therefore, higher scores reveal greater impairment.

    Measured: at 90 days post-randomization

  15. Oral Trail Making Test - Parts A and B (executive function)

    The trail Making Test consist of 25 circles distributed over a sheet of paper. In Part A, the circles are numbered 1 - 25, and the patient should draw lines to connect the numbers in ascending order. In Part B, the circles include both numbers (1 - 13) and letters (A - L); as in Part A, the patient draws lines to connect the circles in an ascending pattern, but with the added task of alternating between the numbers and letters (i.e., 1-A-2-B-3-C, etc.). The patient should be instructed to connect the circles as quickly as possible, without lifting the pen or pencil from the paper. Time the patient connects the "trail." If the patient makes an error, point it out immediately and allow the patient to correct it. Results for part B are reported as the number of seconds required to complete the task; therefore, higher scores reveal greater impairment.

    Measured: at 12 months post-randomization

  16. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R) Digit Span (auditory-verbal attention)

    The WAIS-R Digit Span test assesses short term or working memory. The examinee listens to sequences of numbers orally and then repeats them as heard, in increasing order, and in reverse order. The raw scores for "digit span" range from a minimum of 2 to a maximum of 8. For this test, the longer the span the better the cognition; therefore, the higher score is the better outcome.

    Measured: baseline

  17. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R) Digit Span (auditory-verbal attention)

    The WAIS-R Digit Span test assesses short term or working memory. The examinee listens to sequences of numbers orally and then repeats them as heard, in increasing order, and in reverse order. The raw scores for "digit span" range from a minimum of 2 to a maximum of 8. For this test, the longer the span the better the cognition; therefore, the higher score is the better outcome.

    Measured: at 90 days post-randomization

  18. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R) Digit Span (auditory-verbal attention)

    The WAIS-R Digit Span test assesses short term or working memory. The examinee listens to sequences of numbers orally and then repeats them as heard, in increasing order, and in reverse order. The raw scores for "digit span" range from a minimum of 2 to a maximum of 8. For this test, the longer the span the better the cognition; therefore, the higher score is the better outcome.

    Measured: at 12 months post-randomization

  19. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R) Digit Symbol Substitution Test (processing speed)

    The WAIS-R Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) is a paper-and-pencil cognitive test that consist of number-symbol pairs. It requires the examinee to copy, into spaces below rows of numbers, the symbols that are paired to each number. The DSST score is the number of digits coded correctly in a 90-second test period

    Measured: at baseline

  20. Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Verbal Fluency Test (verbal fluency/executive function)

    The D-KEFS Verbal Fluency Test is comprised of three testing conditions: Letter Fluency, Category Fluency, and Category Switching. This test measures multiple aspects of verbal productivity and cognitive flexibility. It evaluates effectiveness of novel and semantic search strategies, and assesses flexibility in the implementation of word search strategies. There are three conditions in the test in which the examinee must say as many words as they can by letter, category, and category switching prompts.

    Measured: at baseline

  21. Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Verbal Fluency Test (verbal fluency/executive function)

    The D-KEFS Verbal Fluency Test is comprised of three testing conditions: Letter Fluency, Category Fluency, and Category Switching. This test measures multiple aspects of verbal productivity and cognitive flexibility. It evaluates effectiveness of novel and semantic search strategies, and assesses flexibility in the implementation of word search strategies. There are three conditions in the test in which the examinee must say as many words as they can by letter, category, and category switching prompts.

    Measured: at 90 days post-randomization

  22. Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Verbal Fluency Test (verbal fluency/executive function)

    The D-KEFS Verbal Fluency Test is comprised of three testing conditions: Letter Fluency, Category Fluency, and Category Switching. This test measures multiple aspects of verbal productivity and cognitive flexibility. It evaluates effectiveness of novel and semantic search strategies, and assesses flexibility in the implementation of word search strategies. There are three conditions in the test in which the examinee must say as many words as they can by letter, category, and category switching prompts.

    Measured: at 12 months post-randomization

  23. Incidence of Delirium

    The incidence of delirium will be assessed daily by the Confusion Assessment Method (3D-CAM or CAM-ICU) scale, or by the presence of a delirium adverse event, during the first 7 days post-randomization.

    The CAM consists of 4 features: 1-Onset, 2-Inattention, 3-Disorganized thinking, and 4-altered level of consciousness. The diagnosis of delirium by CAM is based on the presence of features 1 and 2, and either 3 or 4 and involves the presence/absence of delirium, but not its severity. Any error or behavioral observation consistent with a delirium feature means that feature is present.

    Measured: first 7 days post-randomization

  24. Duration of Delirium

    The duration of delirium will be measured as the number of days with positive CAM assessments or delirium adverse events by 7 days post-randomization.

    The CAM consists of 4 features: 1-Onset, 2-Inattention, 3-Disorganized thinking, and 4-altered level of consciousness. The diagnosis of delirium by CAM is based on the presence of features 1 and 2, and either 3 or 4.

    Measured: first 7 days post-randomization

  25. Severity of Delirium

    The severity of delirium will be measured during daily screening using standardized algorithms for extracting symptom severity from the 3D-CAM and CAM-ICU.

    Measured: first 7 days post-randomization

  26. Number of Patients who experience Acute kidney injury (AKI)

    Number of Patients who experience Acute kidney injury will be assessed within 7 days post-randomization.

    Measured: within -7 days post-randomization

  27. All-cause mortality

    All-cause mortality within 90 days post-randomization will be assessed.

    Measured: within 90 days post-randomization

  28. All-cause mortality

    All-cause mortality within 12-months post-randomization will be assessed.

    Measured: within 12 months post-randomization

  29. Length of Index Hospitalization

    Overall length of stay for the index hospitalization post-randomization will be measured and broken down by days spent in the ICU versus days not in the ICU.

    Measured: at hospital discharge, up to 30 days

  30. Discharge disposition

    Discharge disposition

    Measured: at hospital discharge, up to 30 days

  31. Readmissions rates

    Readmission rates will be calculated for the first 90 days following randomization. Hospitalizations will be classified for all causes including for cardiovascular readmissions.

    Measured: first 90 days

  32. Readmissions rates

    Readmission rates will be calculated for the duration of follow-up, out to 1 year. Hospitalizations will be classified for all causes including for cardiovascular readmissions.

    Measured: up to 1 year post-randomization

  33. Days Alive out of Hospital

    Days alive out of hospital and nursing/rehab facilities within 90 days after randomization

    Measured: within 90 days post-randomization

  34. Actigraphy

    Actigraphy data will be collected for a period of 7 days prior to the index surgical procedure. Actigraphic monitoring employs an accelerometer the size of a watch, which each study patient will wear on the wrist.

    Collected for participants in substudy.

    Measured: 7-day period prior to index surgical procedure and Day 1 post index surgical procedure through hospital discharge

  35. Amount of Circadian Light

    A Speck light meter will be worn as a pendant while awake for a period of 7 days prior to surgery. Light measurements from light meters used as pendants are the closest to light measurements at eye level. The light meter will also be used to monitor the total amount of circadian light received by the patient.

    Collected for participants in substudy.

    Measured: 7-day period prior to index surgical procedure

  36. Photopic Light Levels

    A Speck light meter will be worn as a pendant while awake for a period of 7 days prior to surgery. Light measurements from light meters used as pendants are the closest to light measurements at eye level. The light meter will also be used to calculate photopic light levels

    Collected for participants in substudy.

    Measured: 7-day period prior to index surgical procedure

  37. Circadian Stimulus Values

    A Speck light meter will be worn as a pendant while awake for a period of 7 days prior to surgery. Light measurements from light meters used as pendants are the closest to light measurements at eye level. The light meter will also be used to calculate circadian stimulus values,

    Collected for participants in substudy.

    Measured: 7-day period prior to index surgical procedure

  38. Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire

    Patients who are able to do so will be asked to fill out the Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ), which is a brief 2-minute questionnaire designed for patient use in the ICU. Full score range from 0-100, with higher score indicating better sleep.

    Collected for participants in substudy.

    Measured: Day 1 post index surgical procedure through patient discharge from the ICU (average ICU stay is 3 days)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Sep 2023
  2. Study start18 Sep 2023
  3. Primary completion1 Apr 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Apr 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Patients will be randomized 1:1 to the embolic protection device or to a standard cannula in the OR immediately after sternotomy and confirmation by the surgical team of the patient's suitability for the proposed intervention (CardioGard embolic protection device).
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
842 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06027788
Sponsor's protocol ID
STUDY-23-00417
Other IDs
5U01HL088942-16
Acronym
EMPRO
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
21 Aug 2023
Last updated
2 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes: Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices).

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing CardioGard Embolic Protection Cannula and Standard Aortic Cannula in people with Delirium and Ischemic Stroke, run by Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai at 24 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 24 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of patients who experience ischemic stroke and Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) (time frame: within 3 days post-randomization). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in