Thyroid NoduleNCT06029946
B-mode Ultrasound, Sono-Elastography, and Diffusion-weighted Imaging MRI in Thyroid Nodules
An observational study of Thyroid Nodule, run by Assiut University.
Trial summary
To compare the accuracy of the conventional Ultrasound 'TI-RADS', US elastography, DWI MRI, and its ADC value in characterization and differentiation of thyroid nodules. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Thyroid Nodule
- What is being tested?
- elastography, ultrasound
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Sep 2023to Dec 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Study will include patients referred to the radiology department at Assuit university presented with clinically thyroid-related neck swelling
Who may be able to join
- Patients should have a normal bleeding profile.
- Presence of solitary or multiple nodules in the thyroid gland.
- In the case of patients having multiple nodules, the nodule having suspicious ultrasound features (having TI-RADS score 4 or 5) was selected for further analysis.
- The nodules were either solid or mixed (containing both solid and cystic parts) with a predominant solid component
Who cannot join
- Contraindicated biopsy (as thrombocytopenia or bleeding disorder).
- Patient with cystic and mainly cystic nodules (TI-RADS 1 nodules).
- Nodules with complete shell-calcification which may cause color mapping artifacts.
- MRI contraindications such as Claustrophobia, MR-incompatible pacemakers, and MR-incompatible prosthetic heart valves.
- Patients with recurrent thyroid masses.
- History of operative procedure, chemo, or radiotherapy on the thyroid gland.
- Declined consent.
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
Official title: Comparative Study of B-mode Ultrasound, Sono-Elastography, and Diffusion-weighted Imaging MRI in the Characterization of Thyroid Nodules
To compare the accuracy of the conventional Ultrasound 'TI-RADS', US elastography, DWI MRI, and its ADC value in characterization and differentiation of thyroid nodules.
Read the detailed description
Thyroid nodules are one of the most common endocrine carcinomata (1) Most thyroid tumors have a good prognosis if early diagnosis and timely treated (2) An Ultrasound (US) exam is a safe, non-invasive imaging technique for detecting thyroid nodules (3) However, still there are no dependable criteria to discriminate malignant from benign lesions. (4) In 2009, Horvath et al proposed the Thyroid Imaging Report and Data System (TI-RADS). The new version of TI-RADS was launched by ACR in 2017. (5) Color Doppler ultrasound is also used to differentiate benign from malignant thyroid nodules. The presence of intra-nodular vascularity (Type 1b) was considered close to be malignant (6) US elastography is a novel tool to increase the diagnostic value of Ultrasound and as an adjuvant tool (7) Shear wave elastography evaluates elasticity through the propagation speed of shear waves, with the wave speed being faster in hard tissue (8) Conventional T1-and T2-weighted MR imaging can-not differentiate benign from malignant nodules (9) Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is a non-invasive tool used to distinguish benign from malignant nodules (10). Malignant thyroid nodules usually have a lower ADC value attributed to cellular density and tissue perfusion. (11) Combining subjective MRI features with a quantitative measurement could improve the diagnostic yield of DW-MRI (12) The cytological examination by fine-needle aspiration (FNA) has become a reliable tool to diagnose thyroid cancers (2) Suspicious cytological findings reach up to 30% of all aspirated nodules, suggesting the need for less invasive methods (13)
- Conditions
- Thyroid Nodule
- Being tested
- elastography, ultrasound
- Keywords
- Elastography, DWI thyroid, Thyroid Ultrasound
- Medical subject headings
- Thyroid Nodule
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
elastography, ultrasoundDiagnostic test
Also called MRI and fine needle biopsy
First local anesthesia with lidocaine 2%, then 3 smears will be obtained for each nodule using a 20-22 gauge needle, multiple passes within the lesion will be made to obtain sufficient cells, the aspirate will be spread over a glass, fixed with ethanol 95% and submitted to the pathology department to be reported.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
compare findings of ultrasound, elastography values , ADC value with the gold standard (biopsy results)
To assess concordance of US suspicious features, US elastography results , MRI DWI, ADC value results, and the gold standard US-guided FNAB and ability to differentiate benign from malignant thyroid nodules.
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (5)
Apply ADC value Cut-off level to differentiate benign from malignant thyroid nodules
compare ADC value of benign and malignant nodules to obtain a cutoff level
Measured: 1 year
Apply US shear elastography parameters Cut-off levels to differentiate benign from malignant thyroid nodules.
compare also benign and malignant nodules qualitative and quantitative elastography results.
qualitative measurement is defined as :each nodule was assigned an elasticity score based on the color pattern type according to the classification proposed by Ueno classification method (color coded map) ranging from blue to green colors. hard nodules on the map appears as blue color and soft nodules appears as red color.
Quantitative assessment of the velocity of US wave propagation through tissue. measurement units are: kilopascal (Kpa), and shear wave velocity (m/sec).
Measured: 1 year
Compare individual specific US features with the Gold standard US-guided FNAB which is more important.
which is the most suspicious feature in ulrasound.
The five Ultrasound suspicious features are:
- predominantly Solid nodule.
- Marked hypoechogenicity.
- Microlobulated or irregular margins.
- Micro-Calcifications.
- Taller-than-wide in shape with a ratio ≥ 1.
Measured: 1 year
Study role of color doppler in differentiating benign from malignant thyroid nodules
which pattern of color doppler study is the most suspicious:
Classified into 4 groups:
0= Avascular.
1a= Peri-nodular vascularity.
1b= Intra-nodular vascularity.
1c= Peri-nodular and intranodular vascularity.
Measured: 1 year
Compare the added value of combining different modalities, which have the higher sensitivity and specificity in differentiating benign from malignant thyroid nodules
combination of different imaging modalities which will have the best sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of malignant thyroid nodules
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Sep 2023
- Study startSep 2023 (estimated)
- Primary completionSep 2024 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Thyroid NoduleStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assiut UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assiut University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Salma Ahmed Ragheb, Assiut University
- Investigators
- noha mohamed ali, assistant professor, Study chair, nohamohamedali@yahoo.comsami Abdel_Aziz Khalil, professor, Study director, samyKhalil24@gmail.com
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06029946
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Elastography and DWI thyroid
- Status last verified
- Sep 2023
- First submitted
- 23 Jan 2023
- Last updated
- 8 Sep 2023
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Qin P, Wu K, Hu Y, Zeng J, Chai X. Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules Using Combined Conventional Ultrasound and Ultrasound Elasticity Imaging. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2020 Apr;24(4):1028-1036. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2019.2950994. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
PubMed 31689223Wu Q, Li Y, Liu Y, Shen J, Wang Y, Yi X, Hu B. The value of conventional sonography and ultrasound elastography in decision-making for thyroid nodules in different categories of the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2020;74(3):255-266. doi: 10.3233/CH-180533.
PubMed 31683465Floridi C, Cellina M, Buccimazza G, Arrichiello A, Sacrini A, Arrigoni F, Pompili G, Barile A, Carrafiello G. Ultrasound imaging classifications of thyroid nodules for malignancy risk stratification and clinical management: state of the art. Gland Surg. 2019 Sep;8(Suppl 3):S233-S244. doi: 10.21037/gs.2019.07.01.
PubMed 31559190Zhang WB, Li JJ, Chen XY, He BL, Shen RH, Liu H, Chen J, He XF. SWE combined with ACR TI-RADS categories for malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules with indeterminate FNA cytology. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2020;76(3):381-390. doi: 10.3233/CH-200893.
PubMed 32675401Swan KZ, Bonnema SJ, Jespersen ML, Nielsen VE. Reappraisal of shear wave elastography as a diagnostic tool for identifying thyroid carcinoma. Endocr Connect. 2019 Aug;8(8):1195-1205. doi: 10.1530/EC-19-0324.
PubMed 31340198Kwak JY, Kim EK. Ultrasound elastography for thyroid nodules: recent advances. Ultrasonography. 2014 Apr;33(2):75-82. doi: 10.14366/usg.13025. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
PubMed 24936499Wang H, Wei R, Liu W, Chen Y, Song B. Diagnostic efficacy of multiple MRI parameters in differentiating benign vs. malignant thyroid nodules. BMC Med Imaging. 2018 Dec 3;18(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12880-018-0294-0.
PubMed 30509198Gorgulu FF. Which Is the Best Reference Tissue for Strain Elastography in Predicting Malignancy in Thyroid Nodules, the Sternocleidomastoid Muscle or the Thyroid Parenchyma? J Ultrasound Med. 2019 Nov;38(11):3053-3064. doi: 10.1002/jum.15013. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
PubMed 31037753Cantisani V, David E, Grazhdani H, Rubini A, Radzina M, Dietrich CF, Durante C, Lamartina L, Grani G, Valeria A, Bosco D, Di Gioia C, Frattaroli FM, D'Andrea V, De Vito C, Fresilli D, D'Ambrosio F, Giacomelli L, Catalano C. Prospective Evaluation of Semiquantitative Strain Ratio and Quantitative 2D Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography (SWE) in Association with TIRADS Classification for Thyroid Nodule Characterization. Ultraschall Med. 2019 Aug;40(4):495-503. doi: 10.1055/a-0853-1821. Epub 2019 May 28.
PubMed 31137050Aghaghazvini L, Maheronnaghsh R, Soltani A, Rouzrokh P, Chavoshi M. Diagnostic value of shear wave sonoelastography in differentiation of benign from malignant thyroid nodules. Eur J Radiol. 2020 May;126:108926. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108926. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
PubMed 32171916
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Sep 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparative Study of B-mode Ultrasound, Sono-Elastography, and Diffusion-weighted Imaging MRI in the Characterization of Thyroid Nodules
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06029946
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Elastography and DWI thyroid
- Conditions
- Thyroid Nodule
- Keywords
- Elastography, DWI thyroid, Thyroid Ultrasound
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Assiut UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2023 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Sep 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To compare the accuracy of the conventional Ultrasound 'TI-RADS', US elastography, DWI MRI, and its ADC value in characterization and differentiation of thyroid nodules.
Detailed description
Thyroid nodules are one of the most common endocrine carcinomata (1) Most thyroid tumors have a good prognosis if early diagnosis and timely treated (2) An Ultrasound (US) exam is a safe, non-invasive imaging technique for detecting thyroid nodules (3) However, still there are no dependable criteria to discriminate malignant from benign lesions. (4) In 2009, Horvath et al proposed the Thyroid Imaging Report and Data System (TI-RADS). The new version of TI-RADS was launched by ACR in 2017. (5) Color Doppler ultrasound is also used to differentiate benign from malignant thyroid nodules. The presence of intra-nodular vascularity (Type 1b) was considered close to be malignant (6) US elastography is a novel tool to increase the diagnostic value of Ultrasound and as an adjuvant tool (7) Shear wave elastography evaluates elasticity through the propagation speed of shear waves, with the wave speed being faster in hard tissue (8) Conventional T1-and T2-weighted MR imaging can-not differentiate benign from malignant nodules (9) Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is a non-invasive tool used to distinguish benign from malignant nodules (10). Malignant thyroid nodules usually have a lower ADC value attributed to cellular density and tissue perfusion. (11) Combining subjective MRI features with a quantitative measurement could improve the diagnostic yield of DW-MRI (12) The cytological examination by fine-needle aspiration (FNA) has become a reliable tool to diagnose thyroid cancers (2) Suspicious cytological findings reach up to 30% of all aspirated nodules, suggesting the need for less invasive methods (13)
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Study will include patients referred to the radiology department at Assuit university presented with clinically thyroid-related neck swelling
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients should have a normal bleeding profile.
- Presence of solitary or multiple nodules in the thyroid gland.
- In the case of patients having multiple nodules, the nodule having suspicious ultrasound features (having TI-RADS score 4 or 5) was selected for further analysis.
- The nodules were either solid or mixed (containing both solid and cystic parts) with a predominant solid component
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Contraindicated biopsy (as thrombocytopenia or bleeding disorder).
- Patient with cystic and mainly cystic nodules (TI-RADS 1 nodules).
- Nodules with complete shell-calcification which may cause color mapping artifacts.
- MRI contraindications such as Claustrophobia, MR-incompatible pacemakers, and MR-incompatible prosthetic heart valves.
- Patients with recurrent thyroid masses.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| elastography, ultrasoundAlso: MRI and fine needle biopsyFirst local anesthesia with lidocaine 2%, then 3 smears will be obtained for each nodule using a 20-22 gauge needle, multiple passes within the lesion will be made to obtain sufficient cells, the aspirate will be spread over a glass, fixed with ethanol 95% and submitted to the pathology department to be reported. | Diagnostic test | – |
Primary outcome
compare findings of ultrasound, elastography values , ADC value with the gold standard (biopsy results)
Time frame: 1 year
To assess concordance of US suspicious features, US elastography results , MRI DWI, ADC value results, and the gold standard US-guided FNAB and ability to differentiate benign from malignant thyroid nodules.
5 secondary outcomes
Apply ADC value Cut-off level to differentiate benign from malignant thyroid nodules
Time frame: 1 year
Apply US shear elastography parameters Cut-off levels to differentiate benign from malignant thyroid nodules.
Time frame: 1 year
Compare individual specific US features with the Gold standard US-guided FNAB which is more important.
Time frame: 1 year
Study role of color doppler in differentiating benign from malignant thyroid nodules
Time frame: 1 year
Compare the added value of combining different modalities, which have the higher sensitivity and specificity in differentiating benign from malignant thyroid nodules
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Sep 2023.
- Results publication: PubMed 31689223Qin P, Wu K, Hu Y, Zeng J, Chai X. Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules Using Combined Conventional Ultrasound and Ultrasound Elasticity Imaging. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2020 Apr;24(4):1028-1036. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2019.2950994. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
- Results publication: PubMed 31683465Wu Q, Li Y, Liu Y, Shen J, Wang Y, Yi X, Hu B. The value of conventional sonography and ultrasound elastography in decision-making for thyroid nodules in different categories of the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2020;74(3):255-266. doi: 10.3233/CH-180533.
- Results publication: PubMed 31559190Floridi C, Cellina M, Buccimazza G, Arrichiello A, Sacrini A, Arrigoni F, Pompili G, Barile A, Carrafiello G. Ultrasound imaging classifications of thyroid nodules for malignancy risk stratification and clinical management: state of the art. Gland Surg. 2019 Sep;8(Suppl 3):S233-S244. doi: 10.21037/gs.2019.07.01.
- Results publication: PubMed 32675401Zhang WB, Li JJ, Chen XY, He BL, Shen RH, Liu H, Chen J, He XF. SWE combined with ACR TI-RADS categories for malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules with indeterminate FNA cytology. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2020;76(3):381-390. doi: 10.3233/CH-200893.
- Results publication: PubMed 31340198Swan KZ, Bonnema SJ, Jespersen ML, Nielsen VE. Reappraisal of shear wave elastography as a diagnostic tool for identifying thyroid carcinoma. Endocr Connect. 2019 Aug;8(8):1195-1205. doi: 10.1530/EC-19-0324.
- Results publication: PubMed 24936499Kwak JY, Kim EK. Ultrasound elastography for thyroid nodules: recent advances. Ultrasonography. 2014 Apr;33(2):75-82. doi: 10.14366/usg.13025. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
- Results publication: PubMed 30509198Wang H, Wei R, Liu W, Chen Y, Song B. Diagnostic efficacy of multiple MRI parameters in differentiating benign vs. malignant thyroid nodules. BMC Med Imaging. 2018 Dec 3;18(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12880-018-0294-0.
- Results publication: PubMed 31037753Gorgulu FF. Which Is the Best Reference Tissue for Strain Elastography in Predicting Malignancy in Thyroid Nodules, the Sternocleidomastoid Muscle or the Thyroid Parenchyma? J Ultrasound Med. 2019 Nov;38(11):3053-3064. doi: 10.1002/jum.15013. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
- Results publication: PubMed 31137050Cantisani V, David E, Grazhdani H, Rubini A, Radzina M, Dietrich CF, Durante C, Lamartina L, Grani G, Valeria A, Bosco D, Di Gioia C, Frattaroli FM, D'Andrea V, De Vito C, Fresilli D, D'Ambrosio F, Giacomelli L, Catalano C. Prospective Evaluation of Semiquantitative Strain Ratio and Quantitative 2D Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography (SWE) in Association with TIRADS Classification for Thyroid Nodule Characterization. Ultraschall Med. 2019 Aug;40(4):495-503. doi: 10.1055/a-0853-1821. Epub 2019 May 28.
- Results publication: PubMed 32171916Aghaghazvini L, Maheronnaghsh R, Soltani A, Rouzrokh P, Chavoshi M. Diagnostic value of shear wave sonoelastography in differentiation of benign from malignant thyroid nodules. Eur J Radiol. 2020 May;126:108926. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108926. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
- Conventional ultrasound, color Doppler, TI-RADS, and shear wave elastography for thyroid nodule differentiation: a study of efficacy compared with the histopathology resultsLink provided by the sponsor.
- Diagnostic accuracy of B-mode ultrasound, ultrasound elastography and diffusion weighted MRI in differentiation of thyroid nodules (prospective study)Link provided by the sponsor.
- DIFFUSION WEIGHTED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN DIFFERENTIATION OF BENIGN AND MALIGNANT THYROID NODULESLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Thyroid Nodule
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Serum Treg/Th17-Related Cytokines and Systemic Inflammatory Indices in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer
Differentiated Thyroid Cancer (DTC), Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
Recruiting
Ultrasound-guided Microwave Ablation of Benign Thyroid Nodules
Thyroid Nodule (Diagnosis)
Not yet recruiting
Endotracheal Tube Versus Transcartilage Needle Electrodes for Nerve Monitoring in Thyroid Surgery
Thyroid Diseases, Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Injury
RecruitingObservational study
Studies on Tumors of the Thyroid
Hurthle Cell Thyroid Cancer, Tall Cell Variant Thyroid Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Prospective Evaluation of the Pulse Biosciences nPulse™ Vybrance™ Percutaneous Electrode System
Thyroid Nodule, Thyroid Goiter
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
noha mohamed ali, assistant professor study chair
nohamohamedali@yahoo.com
sami Abdel_Aziz Khalil, professor study director
samyKhalil24@gmail.com
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Thyroid Nodule, run by Assiut University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact salma ahmed ragheb, assistant lecturer (01025656052, salmarageb3456@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
compare findings of ultrasound, elastography values , ADC value with the gold standard (biopsy results) (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06029946, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Sep 2023.