AzTrials
AzTrials

Catheter ComplicationsNCT06031545

An Exploratory Study of Perioperative Venous Access in Obese Patients

A study testing Long peripheral venous catheters for use and Midline catheter in people with Catheter Complications, run by Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is intended to explore the application effect of long peripheral intravenous catheters(LPCs) and midline catheters(MCs) in the perioperative period of obese patients, aiming at providing the scientific basis for the optimal perioperative venous access for the obese patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Catheter Complications
What is being tested?
Long peripheral venous catheters for use and Midline catheter
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
528 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Dec 2023to 30 Dec 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Obese patients (BMI ≥ 30kg/m2) who are to undergo surgery.
  • Expected length of hospitalisation within 2 weeks.
  • Conscious and able to communicate normally.

Who cannot join

  • It is expected that perioperative medications will need to be infused via a central venous catheter (e.g. total parenteral nutrition TPN);
  • Patients with an indwelling central venous catheter on admission

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Linfang Zhao

    Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310000

Other trials in China

About this study

This study is intended to explore the application effect of long peripheral intravenous catheters(LPCs) and midline catheters(MCs) in the perioperative period of obese patients, aiming at providing the scientific basis for the optimal perioperative venous access for the obese patients.

Read the detailed description

This study is intended to explore the application effect of long peripheral intravenous catheters(LPCs) and midline catheters(MCs) in the perioperative period of obese patients; at the same time, the LPCs will be used as the control group and the MCs as the experimental group, to compare whether the application of LPCs in the perioperative period of obese patients is not inferior to that of the MCs; the comprehensive comparison of the effect of the clinical application and the evaluation of the health economics, aiming at providing the scientific basis for the optimal perioperative venous access for the obese patients.

Being tested
Long peripheral venous catheters for use, Midline catheter

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Long peripheral venous catheters for useOther

    Long peripheral venous catheters for use during the perioperative period in obese patients

  • Midline catheterOther

    Midline catheters for use during the perioperative period in obese patients

Study groups in NCT06031545
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Long peripheral venous cathetersExperimentalIn the test group used LPCs during the perioperative period in obese patients
Receives: Other: Long peripheral venous catheters for use
Midline cathetersOtherIn the control group used LPCs during the perioperative period in obese patients
Receives: Other: Midline catheter

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Catheter-related complication rate

    The proportion of patients with complications as a proportion of the total number of cases

    Measured: during catheter indwelling,an average of 2 weeks

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Catheter retention days

    Number of days from the day of catheter placement to the day of extubation

    Measured: during catheter indwelling,an average of 2 weeks

  2. Completion rate of treatment via one catheter

    Number of patient cases in which all infusion treatments were completed via one catheter/total number of patient cases

    Measured: during catheter indwelling,an average of 2 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Sep 2023
  2. Study start1 Dec 2023 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion30 Nov 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Dec 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
528 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06031545
Sponsor's protocol ID
20230718072255619
Status last verified
Sep 2023
First submitted
4 Sep 2023
Last updated
11 Sep 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: You can email if you need to

Publications

  • Pan XF, Wang L, Pan A. Epidemiology and determinants of obesity in China. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021 Jun;9(6):373-392. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00045-0.

    PubMed 34022156
  • Kivimaki M, Strandberg T, Pentti J, Nyberg ST, Frank P, Jokela M, Ervasti J, Suominen SB, Vahtera J, Sipila PN, Lindbohm JV, Ferrie JE. Body-mass index and risk of obesity-related complex multimorbidity: an observational multicohort study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2022 Apr;10(4):253-263. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00033-X. Epub 2022 Mar 4.

    PubMed 35248171
  • Zheng Y, Manson JE, Yuan C, Liang MH, Grodstein F, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Hu FB. Associations of Weight Gain From Early to Middle Adulthood With Major Health Outcomes Later in Life. JAMA. 2017 Jul 18;318(3):255-269. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7092.

    PubMed 28719691
  • GBD 2015 Obesity Collaborators; Afshin A, Forouzanfar MH, Reitsma MB, Sur P, Estep K, Lee A, Marczak L, Mokdad AH, Moradi-Lakeh M, Naghavi M, Salama JS, Vos T, Abate KH, Abbafati C, Ahmed MB, Al-Aly Z, Alkerwi A, Al-Raddadi R, Amare AT, Amberbir A, Amegah AK, Amini E, Amrock SM, Anjana RM, Arnlov J, Asayesh H, Banerjee A, Barac A, Baye E, Bennett DA, Beyene AS, Biadgilign S, Biryukov S, Bjertness E, Boneya DJ, Campos-Nonato I, Carrero JJ, Cecilio P, Cercy K, Ciobanu LG, Cornaby L, Damtew SA, Dandona L, Dandona R, Dharmaratne SD, Duncan BB, Eshrati B, Esteghamati A, Feigin VL, Fernandes JC, Furst T, Gebrehiwot TT, Gold A, Gona PN, Goto A, Habtewold TD, Hadush KT, Hafezi-Nejad N, Hay SI, Horino M, Islami F, Kamal R, Kasaeian A, Katikireddi SV, Kengne AP, Kesavachandran CN, Khader YS, Khang YH, Khubchandani J, Kim D, Kim YJ, Kinfu Y, Kosen S, Ku T, Defo BK, Kumar GA, Larson HJ, Leinsalu M, Liang X, Lim SS, Liu P, Lopez AD, Lozano R, Majeed A, Malekzadeh R, Malta DC, Mazidi M, McAlinden C, McGarvey ST, Mengistu DT, Mensah GA, Mensink GBM, Mezgebe HB, Mirrakhimov EM, Mueller UO, Noubiap JJ, Obermeyer CM, Ogbo FA, Owolabi MO, Patton GC, Pourmalek F, Qorbani M, Rafay A, Rai RK, Ranabhat CL, Reinig N, Safiri S, Salomon JA, Sanabria JR, Santos IS, Sartorius B, Sawhney M, Schmidhuber J, Schutte AE, Schmidt MI, Sepanlou SG, Shamsizadeh M, Sheikhbahaei S, Shin MJ, Shiri R, Shiue I, Roba HS, Silva DAS, Silverberg JI, Singh JA, Stranges S, Swaminathan S, Tabares-Seisdedos R, Tadese F, Tedla BA, Tegegne BS, Terkawi AS, Thakur JS, Tonelli M, Topor-Madry R, Tyrovolas S, Ukwaja KN, Uthman OA, Vaezghasemi M, Vasankari T, Vlassov VV, Vollset SE, Weiderpass E, Werdecker A, Wesana J, Westerman R, Yano Y, Yonemoto N, Yonga G, Zaidi Z, Zenebe ZM, Zipkin B, Murray CJL. Health Effects of Overweight and Obesity in 195 Countries over 25 Years. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 6;377(1):13-27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1614362. Epub 2017 Jun 12.

    PubMed 28604169
  • Juvin P, Blarel A, Bruno F, Desmonts JM. Is peripheral line placement more difficult in obese than in lean patients? Anesth Analg. 2003 Apr;96(4):1218. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000050570.85195.29.

    PubMed 12651688
  • Keogh S, Shelverton C, Flynn J, Mihala G, Mathew S, Davies KM, Marsh N, Rickard CM. Implementation and evaluation of short peripheral intravenous catheter flushing guidelines: a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial. BMC Med. 2020 Sep 30;18(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01728-1.

    PubMed 32993628
  • Shokoohi H, Boniface K, McCarthy M, Khedir Al-tiae T, Sattarian M, Ding R, Liu YT, Pourmand A, Schoenfeld E, Scott J, Shesser R, Yadav K. Ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access program is associated with a marked reduction in central venous catheter use in noncritically ill emergency department patients. Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Feb;61(2):198-203. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.09.016. Epub 2012 Nov 7.

    PubMed 23141920
  • Chopra V, Flanders SA, Saint S, Woller SC, O'Grady NP, Safdar N, Trerotola SO, Saran R, Moureau N, Wiseman S, Pittiruti M, Akl EA, Lee AY, Courey A, Swaminathan L, LeDonne J, Becker C, Krein SL, Bernstein SJ; Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravenouse Catheters (MAGIC) Panel. The Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravenous Catheters (MAGIC): Results From a Multispecialty Panel Using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. Ann Intern Med. 2015 Sep 15;163(6 Suppl):S1-40. doi: 10.7326/M15-0744.

    PubMed 26369828
  • Nielsen EB, Antonsen L, Mensel C, Milandt N, Dalgaard LS, Illum BS, Arildsen H, Juhl-Olsen P. The efficacy of midline catheters-a prospective, randomized, active-controlled study. Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Jan;102:220-225. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.10.053. Epub 2020 Oct 28.

    PubMed 33129962
  • Gorski LA, Hadaway L, Hagle ME, Broadhurst D, Clare S, Kleidon T, Meyer BM, Nickel B, Rowley S, Sharpe E, Alexander M. Infusion Therapy Standards of Practice, 8th Edition. J Infus Nurs. 2021 Jan-Feb 01;44(1S Suppl 1):S1-S224. doi: 10.1097/NAN.0000000000000396. No abstract available.

    PubMed 33394637
  • Zhao L, Yang X, Liu C, Yu W, Cao X, Li X, Wang J, Zhuang Y. Comparative safety and efficacy of midline catheters versus long peripheral catheters in patients undergoing bariatric surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 20;15(1):30534. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-12551-0.

    PubMed 40835653

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Long peripheral venous catheters for use and Midline catheter in people with Catheter Complications, run by Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Linfang Zhao (+86 13588819123, 3193159@zju.edu.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Catheter-related complication rate (time frame: during catheter indwelling,an average of 2 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06031545, which also lists 11 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Sep 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in