Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeDEEPNCT06032143
Doulas as Environmental Educators and Partners Study
A study testing Online educational phthalate course, Phthalate conversation and Environmental exposures conversation in people with Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, run by Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH) at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The aims of this project are: Aim 1: Determine the extent to which an environmental health literacy educational intervention designed for doulas improves their environmental health literacy of endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) in personal care products. Hypothesis 1a. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
- What is being tested?
- Online educational phthalate course, Phthalate conversation and Environmental exposures conversation
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 20 Oct 2023to 15 Mar 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Doulas currently working with pregnant individuals <30 weeks into their pregnancy
- Pregnant individuals working with doulas who are <30 weeks into their pregnancy
Who cannot join
- Doulas not currently working with pregnant individuals <30 weeks into their pregnancy
- Pregnant individuals working with doulas who are beyond 30 weeks into their pregnancy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
About this study
The aims of this project are:
Aim 1: Determine the extent to which an environmental health literacy educational intervention designed for doulas improves their environmental health literacy of endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) in personal care products.
Read more
Hypothesis 1a. Doulas who participate in an environmental health literacy course will have a higher environmental health literacy score based on quantitative questionnaire evaluation post-course compared to pre-course.
Hypothesis 1b. Doulas who participate in the environmental health literacy course will have a higher environmental health literacy scores post-course compared to doulas who do not take the environmental health literacy course.
Aim 2: Determine the extent to which pregnant people counseled by doulas with training in environmental health literacy have higher environmental health literacy scores and lower usage of personal care products containing EDCs following doula counseling.
Hypothesis 2a. Compared to pregnant people not counseled by doulas on EDCs in personal care products, pregnant individuals counseled by doulas on these EDCs will have improved scores in environmental health literacy.
Hypothesis 2b. Compared to pregnant people not counseled by doulas on EDCs in personal care products, pregnant individuals receiving counseling will use fewer personal care products associated with containing EDCs based on a validated questionnaire.
Aim 3: Determine whether concentrations of EDC biomarkers decreased after the intervention for the intervention group.
Hypothesis 3: Urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations will be lower post-course compared to pre-course for the intervention group.
Read the detailed description
Compared to other racial/ethnic groups, non-Hispanic black women have significantly higher concentrations of endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) found in personal care products, including phthalates and parabens These EDCs are linked to a variety of adverse reproductive health outcomes that range from early puberty to preterm birth to hot flashes-all conditions that disproportionately impact black women and their long-term health.
Pregnancy is a particularly sensitive window of exposure to EDCs due to normal physiologic changes that alter the body's lipid and glucose metabolism, vasculature, inflammatory, and coagulation responses. Sadly, pregnancy holds some of the most shocking racial/ethnic health disparities, including a 50% increased risk of preterm birth, up to 2-fold increased risk of preeclampsia, and 3-fold increased risk of maternal mortality. Gaps in health care access have been documented as important contributors to these adverse health outcomes, but little research has evaluated the critical gap in environmental health information, particularly information linked to knowledge, awareness, and action related to EDC exposures. In black pregnant people, doulas have increasingly served an important role in filling health care gaps by providing access, advocacy, support, and education at this sensitive window. Yet, doulas often are not equipped to provide key environmental health information around chemical exposures that are higher in black women. If doulas' environmental health literacy of personal care product EDCs linked to adverse pregnancy outcomes was improved, then pregnant people in their care could benefit from reduced exposure to these chemicals and improved pregnancy outcomes. With this, the investigators intend to leverage the supportive advocacy and educational role doulas provide to black pregnant people to improve EDC environmental health literacy by partnering with Black Millennials 4 Flint organization to 1) educate doulas on EDCs; 2) utilize this newly gained knowledge in a clinical setting for doulas to counsel pregnant people on personal care product EDC chemicals; 3) measure environmental health literacy in doulas and the pregnant people they counsel; 4) evaluate urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations before and after the intervention. To conduct this intervention, the investigators will leverage a personal care product EDC module developed by the Harvard Chan's Environmental Reproductive Justice Lab (PI: Dr. Tamarra James-Todd). The investigators will also utilize an environmental health literacy questionnaire, as well as other previously validated quantitative and qualitative data collection tools. The aims of this project are:
Aim 1: Determine the extent to which an environmental health literacy educational intervention designed for doulas improves their environmental health literacy of EDCs in personal care products Hypothesis 1a. Doulas who participate in an environmental health literacy course will have a higher environmental health literacy score based on quantitative questionnaire evaluation post-course compared to pre-course Hypothesis 1b. Doulas who participate in the environmental health literacy course will have a higher environmental health literacy scores post-course compared to doulas who do not take the environmental health literacy course Aim 2: Determine the extent to which pregnant people counseled by doulas with training in environmental health literacy have higher environmental health literacy scores and lower usage of personal care products containing EDCs following doula counseling Hypothesis 2a. Compared to pregnant people not counseled by doulas on EDCs in personal care products, pregnant individuals counseled by doulas on these EDCs will have improved scores in environmental health literacy Hypothesis 2b. Compared to pregnant people not counseled by doulas on EDCs in personal care products, pregnant individuals receiving counseling will use fewer personal care products associated with containing EDCs based on a validated questionnaire Aim 3: Determine whether concentrations of EDC biomarkers decreased after the intervention for the intervention group.
Hypothesis 3: Urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations will be lower post-course compared to pre-course for the intervention group.
- Conditions
- Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
- Being tested
- Online educational phthalate course, Control environmental education, Phthalate conversation, Environmental exposures conversation
- Medical subject headings
- Behavior
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Online educational phthalate courseBehavioural
This is an online course focused on phthalates for reproductive health professionals. It consists of videos from patient, scientist, and OBGYN perspectives describing how phthalates relate to reproductive health. There is also an interactive module and worksheet to facilitate conversations about phthalates with pregnant individuals.
Control environmental educationBehavioural
Participants in the control group will receive access to environmental exposures other than phthalates.
Phthalate conversationBehavioural
Participants in the intervention groups will be asked to engage in conversations about phthalates between doulas/pregnant individuals.
Environmental exposures conversationBehavioural
Participants in the intervention groups will be asked to engage in conversations about environmental exposures (other than phthalates) between doulas/pregnant individuals.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Doulas | Experimental | Doulas randomized to the intervention group will engage in a one-hour online course about exposure to phthalates and the relationship with reproductive health. Receives: Behavioral: Online educational phthalate course |
| Control Doulas | Sham comparator | Doulas randomized to the control group will access a worksheet about an alternative environmental exposure and the relationship with reproductive health. Receives: Behavioral: Control environmental education |
| Intervention Pregnant Individuals | Experimental | Pregnant individuals working with intervention doulas will be asked to have a conversation with their doulas about environmental chemicals (phthalates). Receives: Behavioral: Phthalate conversation |
| Control Pregnant Individuals | Sham comparator | Pregnant individuals working with control doulas will be asked to have a conversation with their doulas about environmental chemicals (distinct from phthalates). Receives: Behavioral: Environmental exposures conversation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Baseline phthalate environmental health literacy
Measure of phthalate reproductive environmental health literacy via validated scale (pre educational intervention), the Phthalate Environmental Reproductive Health Literacy (PERHL) scale. Scores on the PERHL scale range from 6-31, with a higher score indicating higher environmental health literacy.
Measured: Up to 2 weeks
Change from baseline phthalate environmental health literacy
Measure of phthalate reproductive environmental health literacy via validated scale (post educational intervention), the Phthalate Environmental Reproductive Health Literacy (PERHL) scale. Scores on the PERHL scale range from 6-31, with a higher score indicating higher environmental health literacy.
Measured: Up to 4 weeks
Baseline urinary biomarkers of phthalate exposure
Collected via urine samples, measure of previous phthalate exposures for urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations using a standard panel, measuring 16 urinary phthalate metabolites and their replacements (Cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic acid mono carboxyisooctyl ester (CX-MINCH), mono-2-ethyl-5- carboxypentyl terephthalate (MECPTP), mono-2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl terephthalate (MEHHTP), Cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic acid mono hydroxyisononyl ester (OH-MINCH), mono-n-butylphthalate (mBP), mono-benzyl phthalate (mBzP), mono-carboxy isononyl phthalate (mCnP), mono-carboxy octyl phthalate (mCOP), mono (3-carboxypropyl) phthalate(mCPP), mono-(2-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl) phthalate (mECPP), mono (2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl) phthalate (mEHHP), mono ethyl hexyl phthalate (mEHP), mono (2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl) phthalate (mEOHP), monoethyl phthalate (mEP), mono-isononyl phthalate (mNP), mono-isobutyl phthalate (miBP), and assayed using a modified method from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Measured: Up to 2 weeks
Change in urinary biomarkers of phthalate exposure
Collected via urine samples, measure of previous phthalate exposures. We will evaluate urine samples for urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations using a standard panel, measuring 16 urinary phthalate metabolites and their replacements (CX-MINCH, MECPTP, MEHHTP, OH-MINCH, mBP, mBzP, mCnP, mCOP, mCPP, mECPP, mEHHP, mEHP, mEOHP, mEP, mNP, miBP), and assayed using a modified method from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Briefly, HPLC-MS/MS ESI is conducted based on the CDC's Phthalate Metabolites in Urine Method No: 6306.03. We will also calculate the molar sums of SG-adjusted metabolites representing metabolites related to parent compound DEHP (i.e., ΣDEHP = (mEHP/278) + (mEHHP/294) + (mEOHP/292) + (mECPP/308)) and personal care product (PCP)-associated phthalates (i.e., ΣPCP = (mBP/222) + (miBP/222) + (mEP/194)). Units for all metabolites will be ng/mL.
Measured: Up to 4 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Sep 2023
- Study start20 Oct 2023
- Primary completion30 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion15 Mar 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Tamarra James-Todd, Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06032143
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB23-0748
- Acronym
- DEEP
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 26 Jul 2023
- Last updated
- 15 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Doulas as Environmental Educators and Partners Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06032143
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DEEP / IRB23-0748
- Conditions
- Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)University, hospital or other
- Study start
- 20 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 15 Mar 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aims of this project are:
Aim 1: Determine the extent to which an environmental health literacy educational intervention designed for doulas improves their environmental health literacy of endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) in personal care products.
Hypothesis 1a. Doulas who participate in an environmental health literacy course will have a higher environmental health literacy score based on quantitative questionnaire evaluation post-course compared to pre-course.
Hypothesis 1b. Doulas who participate in the environmental health literacy course will have a higher environmental health literacy scores post-course compared to doulas who do not take the environmental health literacy course.
Aim 2: Determine the extent to which pregnant people counseled by doulas with training in environmental health literacy have higher environmental health literacy scores and lower usage of personal care products containing EDCs following doula counseling.
Hypothesis 2a. Compared to pregnant people not counseled by doulas on EDCs in personal care products, pregnant individuals counseled by doulas on these EDCs will have improved scores in environmental health literacy.
Hypothesis 2b. Compared to pregnant people not counseled by doulas on EDCs in personal care products, pregnant individuals receiving counseling will use fewer personal care products associated with containing EDCs based on a validated questionnaire.
Aim 3: Determine whether concentrations of EDC biomarkers decreased after the intervention for the intervention group.
Hypothesis 3: Urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations will be lower post-course compared to pre-course for the intervention group.
Detailed description
Compared to other racial/ethnic groups, non-Hispanic black women have significantly higher concentrations of endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) found in personal care products, including phthalates and parabens These EDCs are linked to a variety of adverse reproductive health outcomes that range from early puberty to preterm birth to hot flashes-all conditions that disproportionately impact black women and their long-term health.
Pregnancy is a particularly sensitive window of exposure to EDCs due to normal physiologic changes that alter the body's lipid and glucose metabolism, vasculature, inflammatory, and coagulation responses. Sadly, pregnancy holds some of the most shocking racial/ethnic health disparities, including a 50% increased risk of preterm birth, up to 2-fold increased risk of preeclampsia, and 3-fold increased risk of maternal mortality. Gaps in health care access have been documented as important contributors to these adverse health outcomes, but little research has evaluated the critical gap in environmental health information, particularly information linked to knowledge, awareness, and action related to EDC exposures. In black pregnant people, doulas have increasingly served an important role in filling health care gaps by providing access, advocacy, support, and education at this sensitive window. Yet, doulas often are not equipped to provide key environmental health information around chemical exposures that are higher in black women. If doulas' environmental health literacy of personal care product EDCs linked to adverse pregnancy outcomes was improved, then pregnant people in their care could benefit from reduced exposure to these chemicals and improved pregnancy outcomes. With this, the investigators intend to leverage the supportive advocacy and educational role doulas provide to black pregnant people to improve EDC environmental health literacy by partnering with Black Millennials 4 Flint organization to 1) educate doulas on EDCs; 2) utilize this newly gained knowledge in a clinical setting for doulas to counsel pregnant people on personal care product EDC chemicals; 3) measure environmental health literacy in doulas and the pregnant people they counsel; 4) evaluate urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations before and after the intervention. To conduct this intervention, the investigators will leverage a personal care product EDC module developed by the Harvard Chan's Environmental Reproductive Justice Lab (PI: Dr. Tamarra James-Todd). The investigators will also utilize an environmental health literacy questionnaire, as well as other previously validated quantitative and qualitative data collection tools. The aims of this project are:
Aim 1: Determine the extent to which an environmental health literacy educational intervention designed for doulas improves their environmental health literacy of EDCs in personal care products Hypothesis 1a. Doulas who participate in an environmental health literacy course will have a higher environmental health literacy score based on quantitative questionnaire evaluation post-course compared to pre-course Hypothesis 1b. Doulas who participate in the environmental health literacy course will have a higher environmental health literacy scores post-course compared to doulas who do not take the environmental health literacy course Aim 2: Determine the extent to which pregnant people counseled by doulas with training in environmental health literacy have higher environmental health literacy scores and lower usage of personal care products containing EDCs following doula counseling Hypothesis 2a. Compared to pregnant people not counseled by doulas on EDCs in personal care products, pregnant individuals counseled by doulas on these EDCs will have improved scores in environmental health literacy Hypothesis 2b. Compared to pregnant people not counseled by doulas on EDCs in personal care products, pregnant individuals receiving counseling will use fewer personal care products associated with containing EDCs based on a validated questionnaire Aim 3: Determine whether concentrations of EDC biomarkers decreased after the intervention for the intervention group.
Hypothesis 3: Urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations will be lower post-course compared to pre-course for the intervention group.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Doulas | Experimental | Behavioral: Online educational phthalate courseDoulas randomized to the intervention group will engage in a one-hour online course about exposure to phthalates and the relationship with reproductive health. |
| Control Doulas | Sham comparator | Behavioral: Control environmental educationDoulas randomized to the control group will access a worksheet about an alternative environmental exposure and the relationship with reproductive health. |
| Intervention Pregnant Individuals | Experimental | Behavioral: Phthalate conversationPregnant individuals working with intervention doulas will be asked to have a conversation with their doulas about environmental chemicals (phthalates). |
| Control Pregnant Individuals | Sham comparator | Behavioral: Environmental exposures conversationPregnant individuals working with control doulas will be asked to have a conversation with their doulas about environmental chemicals (distinct from phthalates). |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Doulas currently working with pregnant individuals <30 weeks into their pregnancy
- Pregnant individuals working with doulas who are <30 weeks into their pregnancy
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Doulas not currently working with pregnant individuals <30 weeks into their pregnancy
- Pregnant individuals working with doulas who are beyond 30 weeks into their pregnancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Online educational phthalate courseThis is an online course focused on phthalates for reproductive health professionals. It consists of videos from patient, scientist, and OBGYN perspectives describing how phthalates relate to reproductive health. There is also an interactive module and worksheet to facilitate conversations about phthalates with pregnant individuals. | Behavioural | Intervention Doulas |
| Control environmental educationParticipants in the control group will receive access to environmental exposures other than phthalates. | Behavioural | Control Doulas |
| Phthalate conversationParticipants in the intervention groups will be asked to engage in conversations about phthalates between doulas/pregnant individuals. | Behavioural | Intervention Pregnant Individuals |
| Environmental exposures conversationParticipants in the intervention groups will be asked to engage in conversations about environmental exposures (other than phthalates) between doulas/pregnant individuals. | Behavioural | Control Pregnant Individuals |
Primary outcome
Baseline phthalate environmental health literacy
Time frame: Up to 2 weeks
Measure of phthalate reproductive environmental health literacy via validated scale (pre educational intervention), the Phthalate Environmental Reproductive Health Literacy (PERHL) scale. Scores on the PERHL scale range from 6-31, with a higher score indicating higher environmental health literacy.
Change from baseline phthalate environmental health literacy
Time frame: Up to 4 weeks
Measure of phthalate reproductive environmental health literacy via validated scale (post educational intervention), the Phthalate Environmental Reproductive Health Literacy (PERHL) scale. Scores on the PERHL scale range from 6-31, with a higher score indicating higher environmental health literacy.
Baseline urinary biomarkers of phthalate exposure
Time frame: Up to 2 weeks
Collected via urine samples, measure of previous phthalate exposures for urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations using a standard panel, measuring 16 urinary phthalate metabolites and their replacements (Cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic acid mono carboxyisooctyl ester (CX-MINCH), mono-2-ethyl-5- carboxypentyl terephthalate (MECPTP), mono-2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl terephthalate (MEHHTP), Cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic acid mono hydroxyisononyl ester (OH-MINCH), mono-n-butylphthalate (mBP), mono-benzyl phthalate (mBzP), mono-carboxy isononyl phthalate (mCnP), mono-carboxy octyl phthalate (mCOP), mono (3-carboxypropyl) phthalate(mCPP), mono-(2-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl) phthalate (mECPP), mono (2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl) phthalate (mEHHP), mono ethyl hexyl phthalate (mEHP), mono (2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl) phthalate (mEOHP), monoethyl phthalate (mEP), mono-isononyl phthalate (mNP), mono-isobutyl phthalate (miBP), and assayed using a modified method from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Change in urinary biomarkers of phthalate exposure
Time frame: Up to 4 weeks
Collected via urine samples, measure of previous phthalate exposures. We will evaluate urine samples for urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations using a standard panel, measuring 16 urinary phthalate metabolites and their replacements (CX-MINCH, MECPTP, MEHHTP, OH-MINCH, mBP, mBzP, mCnP, mCOP, mCPP, mECPP, mEHHP, mEHP, mEOHP, mEP, mNP, miBP), and assayed using a modified method from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Briefly, HPLC-MS/MS ESI is conducted based on the CDC's Phthalate Metabolites in Urine Method No: 6306.03. We will also calculate the molar sums of SG-adjusted metabolites representing metabolites related to parent compound DEHP (i.e., ΣDEHP = (mEHP/278) + (mEHHP/294) + (mEOHP/292) + (mECPP/308)) and personal care product (PCP)-associated phthalates (i.e., ΣPCP = (mBP/222) + (miBP/222) + (mEP/194)). Units for all metabolites will be ng/mL.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Oct 2026.
Related trials for Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Not yet recruiting
Pilot Study to Co-create and Implement a Multicomponent Intervention to Reduce Mental Health Stigma in Primary Care
Mental Health, Stigma of Mental Illness
Active, not recruiting
A Multilevel Intervention to Improve Adherence to Childhood Cancer Survivorship
Childhood Cancer, Survivorship
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Immersive VR, Non-Immersive VR, and 3D-Printed Models on Anatomy Learning and Cognitive Load
Healthy, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Not yet recruiting
Developing and Validating Health Education Module for Prostate Cancer Prevention Behavior in Iraqi Male University Staff
Prostate Cancer, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Active, not recruiting
Evaluating the Effects of Reproductive Health Training on Provider Behavior
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Training
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Online educational phthalate course, Phthalate conversation and Environmental exposures conversation in people with Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, run by Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH) at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Baseline phthalate environmental health literacy (time frame: Up to 2 weeks). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Oct 2026.