Cystic FibrosisNCT06032273
Lung Transplant READY CF 2: CARING CF Ancillary RCT
A study testing Investigator-designed lung transplant education website in people with Cystic Fibrosis, run by University of Washington at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Lung transplant is an option for treating end-stage lung disease in cystic fibrosis (CF). In the United States, more people with CF and low lung function die each year than undergo lung transplant. More than half of people with CF who die without a lung transplant were never referred for consideration. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cystic Fibrosis
- What is being tested?
- Investigator-designed lung transplant education website
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 132 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 6 Sep 2023to 31 Jul 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Identified as a caregiver or loved one of an individual with CF enrolled in the Lung Transplant READY CF 2 parent RCT, or
- An individual with CF enrolled in the Lung Transplant READY CF 2 parent RCT
Who cannot join
- People who are unable to provide informed consent
- Unable to read or understand English or Spanish to complete surveys or access the website (currently only available in English and Spanish)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
University of Washington Medical Center - Montlake
Seattle, Washington, 98195
Lauren Bartlett, BS, CCRC, 503-583-2869, lrejman@uw.edu
Kathleen Ramos, MD, MSc
About this study
Official title: Exploring Caregiver Needs While Supporting People with CF Learning About Lung Transplant
Lung transplant is an option for treating end-stage lung disease in cystic fibrosis (CF). In the United States, more people with CF and low lung function die each year than undergo lung transplant. More than half of people with CF who die without a lung transplant were never referred for consideration. Patient preference not to undergo lung transplant may account for 25-40% of decisions to defer referral.
Patients' health discussion networks function to support individuals in health related matters and may provide critical support during the lung transplant journey. Increasing awareness of lung transplant, and promoting the process of deliberation and utilization of social support, could reduce the number of people with CF who die without lung transplant. Additionally, the most common patient-endorsed barrier to lung transplant discussions is a worry about being a burden on family and friends after lung transplant. For lung transplant recipients with complex post-operative courses, low social support is associated with increased mortality. Additionally, adequate social support is a requirement at all lung transplant programs in the US.
Read more
Investigators are interested in understanding how caregivers may benefit from using lung transplant educational resources and how caregivers prepare for having discussions with their loved ones and/or helping them make decisions about lung transplant as a treatment option for advanced CF. The purpose of this study is to test whether an investigator-designed research website compared to no caregiver intervention reduces caregiver burden (assessed with the Brief Assessment Scale for Caregivers, BASC), caregiver preparedness for lung transplant discussions, and caregiver lung transplant knowledge as an ancillary study in a multicenter RCT. Further, investigators will assess patient perceptions of caregiver support as measured by the Social Support Effectiveness Questionnaire (SSE-Q) and evaluate caregivers' willingness to provide support through semi-structured interviews in patient-caregiver dyads.
Study involvement will span 6 months and study activities will involve the following:
- Three Zoom research sessions (15-90 minutes each)
- Survey assessments and an interview
- Access to a research website that contains educational resources about lung transplant
Read the detailed description
Lung transplant is an option for treating end-stage lung disease in cystic fibrosis (CF). In the US, more CF patients with forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) less than 30% of predicted die each year than undergo lung transplant. More than half of patients who die without lung transplant were never referred for consideration. This is especially relevant for disproportionately impacted communities with limited access to lung transplant ("communities of concern"), including patients of lower socioeconomic status, minoritized race (e.g. Black, Asian), or Hispanic ethnicity. Patient preference may account for 25-40% of decisions to defer referral, but may at times be informed by inaccurate assumptions. Patients' health discussion networks function to support individuals in health related matters and may provide critical support during the lung transplant journey. Increasing awareness of lung transplant, and promoting the process of deliberation and utilization of social support, could reduce the number of people with CF who die without lung transplant. The CF Foundation (CFF) lung transplant referral guidelines recommend annual discussions with patients once their FEV1 is <50% predicted to allow patients time to become informed about lung transplant. How to integrate caregivers into this discussion is unclear.
Rather than occurring once at the point of care, deliberation is an iterative process in which patients explore what matters most to them when considering medical treatments, often requiring patient collaboration over time with health professionals and their wider social networks. Individuals with CF with all levels of FEV1 report an interest in understanding lung transplant as a potential treatment option. In addition to knowledge gaps about lung transplant identified in a survey of people with CF, investigators found a preparedness gap between how prepared patients feel for the lung transplant decision and how prepared they want to feel. Additionally, the most common patient-endorsed barrier to lung transplant discussions was a worry about being a burden on family and friends after lung transplant. For lung transplant recipients with complex post-operative courses, low social support is associated with increased mortality. Adequate social support is a requirement at all lung transplant programs in the US. Providing support for chronically ill individuals can lead to caregiver burden and burnout. Understanding how to support caregivers of individuals on the lung transplant journey is an important aspect of providing holistic care to people with CF. The CFF recommends routinely measuring caregiver burden using the Brief Assessment Scale for Caregivers (BASC).
Based on prior research, investigators developed a novel lung transplant educational resource that addresses patient-identified knowledge gaps and provides personalized educational content to help people with CF prepare for lung transplant discussions and decisions. The web-based educational resource couples real-life CF patient and caregiver experiences of lung transplant in the form of personal narratives with up-to-date, CF-specific, and guideline-based medical information about lung transplant.
The parent Lung Transplant READY CF 2 study will test the efficacy of the investigator-designed website in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) incorporating mixed methods to assess preparedness for lung transplant discussions among people with CF with FEV1 <50% of predicted, and will explore patient and physician perspectives on the use of the new website for lung transplant education in the era of highly effective CF therapeutics. The overall research objectives for the CARING CF Ancillary RCT will focus on addressing caregivers' education needs, caregiver burden, and understanding the patient-caregiver relationship in decision-making. The central hypothesis is that the investigator-designed website will increase caregivers' preparedness to engage in lung transplant discussions, will lead to greater understanding of the role of caregivers during the transplant journey, and will reduce caregiver burden.
The CARING CF study will be an ancillary RCT. Caregiver participants will take baseline surveys within 3 months of their loved one's enrollment in the parent Lung Transplant READY CF 2 RCT. When the patient participant completes the 3-month study visit in the parent RCT, caregiver participants will repeat surveys and then be randomly assigned 1:1 (stratified by patient's original study arm assignment in parent RCT and patient's baseline report of low social support) to access the investigator-designed website or have no website access for the next three months. Surveys will evaluate knowledge about lung transplant, a Likert scale rating of preparedness for lung transplant discussions, mental health, and caregiver burden (using the BASC). At 3 months after being randomly assigned, there will be a study visit that includes repeated surveys. After completion of the final surveys, all caregiver participants will gain access to the investigator-designed website via individual login to the secure research website. Throughout the 3 months of the randomized portion of the study and for a long-term follow up period of up to 4 years, web analytics will be captured at the individual level to determine caregivers' usage patterns for the research website. Caregivers may be invited to participate in an interview after completion of their final surveys. As part of this ancillary RCT, patient participants who choose to enroll will complete surveys related to their perceived social support at baseline, 3 months and 6 months after their enrollment in the parent RCT and may be invited to participate in an interview with their caregiver.
- Conditions
- Cystic Fibrosis
- Being tested
- Investigator-designed lung transplant education website
- Keywords
- Cystic Fibrosis, Lung Transplantation, Advanced Lung Disease, Caregiver
- Medical subject headings
- Cystic Fibrosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Investigator-designed lung transplant education websiteBehavioural
Caregiver participants assigned to the intervention will access the investigator-designed educational resource via their login to a secure website.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Access to investigator-designed lung transplant education website | Experimental | Access to an investigator-designed web-based educational resource with information about lung transplant for three months. Receives: Behavioral: Investigator-designed lung transplant education website |
| No access to lung transplant education website | No intervention | No access to the investigator-designed lung transplant educational resource. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Brief Assessment Scale for Caregivers (BASC)
The co-primary endpoint is an intention-to-treat assessment of the difference in caregivers' mean change in Brief Assessment Scale for Caregivers (BASC) in the intervention versus control arms of the study from the 3-month to the 6-month study visit using linear mixed models. The BASC is a validated 14-item measure of caregiver burden and includes subscales that reflect positive personal impact (PPI) and negative personal impact (NPI) of caregiving responsibilities. The BASC includes a 4-point Likert scale (scored 0 to 3), with higher scores indicating more burden, and the overall BASC score is an average of the 14 item scores. The BASC has high internal consistency in caregivers for adults with CF (Cronbach's alpha 0.88 for overall BASC and 0.82 for PPI).
Measured: Measured at the 3-month and 6-month study visits
Social Support Effectiveness Questionnaire (SSE-Q)
A co-primary endpoint is an intention-to-treat assessment of change in patient's Social Support Effectiveness Questionnaire (SSE-Q) from 3 months to 6 months and investigators will compare mean change between patients whose caregivers were randomized to the intervention versus control using linear mixed models. The SSE-Q is a validated 26-item measure of social support with higher scores indicating more effective support. The overall scale ranges from 0 to 80 and each subscale can range from 0 to 20. There are 4 subscales: task support, informational support, emotional support and negative effects of support. The first 15 questions are rated on a 5-point Likert scale and the last questions have yes/no responses. The SSE-Q has not previously been utilized in the CF population.
Measured: Measured at the 3-month and 6-month study visits
Secondary outcomes (4)
Confidence-weighted true false knowledge about lung transplant (14-question investigator-designed survey)
Difference in mean change in confidence-weighted true false (CTF) knowledge score will be measured in the intervention versus control arms of the study using linear mixed models. CTF scoring adds points for certainty in correct responses and deducts points for certainty in incorrect responses. Participants receive +2 points when "sure" about a correct response, +1 if unsure about a correct response, -1 if unsure about an incorrect response and -2 if sure about an incorrect response. For a 14-item knowledge test, the maximum score is +28 and the minimum score is -28, with higher scores indicating more knowledge about lung transplant.
Measured: Measured at the 3-month and 6-month study visits
Likert-scale rating of preparedness to discuss lung transplant with their loved one (0-4)
Likert rating of preparedness to discuss lung transplant with their loved one will be measured at each study visit (0=Don't know, 1= Not at all prepared, 2 = A little prepared, 3 = Moderately prepared, 4 = Very prepared). The intention-to-treat analysis will compare mean change in Likert-scale rating between the intervention and control arms of the study using linear mixed models.
Measured: Measured at the 3-month and 6-month study visits
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8)
PHQ-8 is a scale that measures symptoms of depression in the prior 2 weeks on a 0-24 scale, with higher scores indicating worsening depression and a score of 10 or higher consistent with a diagnosis of depression. The intention-to-treat analysis will compare mean change in PHQ-8 between the intervention and control arms of the study using linear mixed models. Investigators will also determine the proportion with new PHQ-8 score greater than or equal to 10 in each study arm.
Measured: Measured at the 3-month and 6-month study visits
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) Scale
GAD-7 is a scale that measures symptoms of anxiety in the prior 2 weeks on a 0-21 scale, with higher scores indicating worsening anxiety and a score of 10 or higher consistent with a diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder. The intention-to-treat analysis will compare mean change in GAD-7 between the intervention and control arms of the study using linear mixed models. Investigators will also determine the proportion with new GAD-7 score greater than or equal to 10 in each study arm.
Measured: Measured at the 3-month and 6-month study visits
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Sep 2023
- Study start6 Sep 2023
- Primary completion30 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Jul 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cystic FibrosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of WashingtonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 132 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Washington
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Kathleen Ramos, University of Washington
- Investigators
- Kathleen Ramos, MD, MS, Principal investigator, University of Washington
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06032273
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STUDY00016943
- Status last verified
- Dec 2024
- First submitted
- 26 Aug 2023
- Last updated
- 6 Dec 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: De-identified individual participant data (IPD) may be shared with other researchers for secondary analyses with the approval of the appropriate Human Subjects Division(s) and the study's principal investigator (PI).
Publications
Ramos KJ, Smith PJ, McKone EF, Pilewski JM, Lucy A, Hempstead SE, Tallarico E, Faro A, Rosenbluth DB, Gray AL, Dunitz JM; CF Lung Transplant Referral Guidelines Committee. Lung transplant referral for individuals with cystic fibrosis: Cystic Fibrosis Foundation consensus guidelines. J Cyst Fibros. 2019 May;18(3):321-333. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2019.03.002. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
PubMed 30926322Hartzler AL, Bartlett LE, Hobler MR, Reid N, Pryor JB, Kapnadak SG, Berry DL, Lober WB, Goss CH, Ramos KJ; Take on Transplant Study Group. Take on transplant: human-centered design of a patient education tool to facilitate informed discussions about lung transplant among people with cystic fibrosis. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Dec 13;30(1):26-37. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac176.
PubMed 36173364
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Dec 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Exploring Caregiver Needs While Supporting People with CF Learning About Lung Transplant
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06032273
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STUDY00016943
- Conditions
- Cystic Fibrosis
- Keywords
- Cystic Fibrosis, Lung Transplantation, Advanced Lung Disease, Caregiver
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 132 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of WashingtonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
- Study start
- 6 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Jul 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Lung transplant is an option for treating end-stage lung disease in cystic fibrosis (CF). In the United States, more people with CF and low lung function die each year than undergo lung transplant. More than half of people with CF who die without a lung transplant were never referred for consideration. Patient preference not to undergo lung transplant may account for 25-40% of decisions to defer referral.
Patients' health discussion networks function to support individuals in health related matters and may provide critical support during the lung transplant journey. Increasing awareness of lung transplant, and promoting the process of deliberation and utilization of social support, could reduce the number of people with CF who die without lung transplant. Additionally, the most common patient-endorsed barrier to lung transplant discussions is a worry about being a burden on family and friends after lung transplant. For lung transplant recipients with complex post-operative courses, low social support is associated with increased mortality. Additionally, adequate social support is a requirement at all lung transplant programs in the US.
Investigators are interested in understanding how caregivers may benefit from using lung transplant educational resources and how caregivers prepare for having discussions with their loved ones and/or helping them make decisions about lung transplant as a treatment option for advanced CF. The purpose of this study is to test whether an investigator-designed research website compared to no caregiver intervention reduces caregiver burden (assessed with the Brief Assessment Scale for Caregivers, BASC), caregiver preparedness for lung transplant discussions, and caregiver lung transplant knowledge as an ancillary study in a multicenter RCT. Further, investigators will assess patient perceptions of caregiver support as measured by the Social Support Effectiveness Questionnaire (SSE-Q) and evaluate caregivers' willingness to provide support through semi-structured interviews in patient-caregiver dyads.
Study involvement will span 6 months and study activities will involve the following:
- Three Zoom research sessions (15-90 minutes each)
- Survey assessments and an interview
- Access to a research website that contains educational resources about lung transplant
Detailed description
Lung transplant is an option for treating end-stage lung disease in cystic fibrosis (CF). In the US, more CF patients with forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) less than 30% of predicted die each year than undergo lung transplant. More than half of patients who die without lung transplant were never referred for consideration. This is especially relevant for disproportionately impacted communities with limited access to lung transplant ("communities of concern"), including patients of lower socioeconomic status, minoritized race (e.g. Black, Asian), or Hispanic ethnicity. Patient preference may account for 25-40% of decisions to defer referral, but may at times be informed by inaccurate assumptions. Patients' health discussion networks function to support individuals in health related matters and may provide critical support during the lung transplant journey. Increasing awareness of lung transplant, and promoting the process of deliberation and utilization of social support, could reduce the number of people with CF who die without lung transplant. The CF Foundation (CFF) lung transplant referral guidelines recommend annual discussions with patients once their FEV1 is <50% predicted to allow patients time to become informed about lung transplant. How to integrate caregivers into this discussion is unclear.
Rather than occurring once at the point of care, deliberation is an iterative process in which patients explore what matters most to them when considering medical treatments, often requiring patient collaboration over time with health professionals and their wider social networks. Individuals with CF with all levels of FEV1 report an interest in understanding lung transplant as a potential treatment option. In addition to knowledge gaps about lung transplant identified in a survey of people with CF, investigators found a preparedness gap between how prepared patients feel for the lung transplant decision and how prepared they want to feel. Additionally, the most common patient-endorsed barrier to lung transplant discussions was a worry about being a burden on family and friends after lung transplant. For lung transplant recipients with complex post-operative courses, low social support is associated with increased mortality. Adequate social support is a requirement at all lung transplant programs in the US. Providing support for chronically ill individuals can lead to caregiver burden and burnout. Understanding how to support caregivers of individuals on the lung transplant journey is an important aspect of providing holistic care to people with CF. The CFF recommends routinely measuring caregiver burden using the Brief Assessment Scale for Caregivers (BASC).
Based on prior research, investigators developed a novel lung transplant educational resource that addresses patient-identified knowledge gaps and provides personalized educational content to help people with CF prepare for lung transplant discussions and decisions. The web-based educational resource couples real-life CF patient and caregiver experiences of lung transplant in the form of personal narratives with up-to-date, CF-specific, and guideline-based medical information about lung transplant.
The parent Lung Transplant READY CF 2 study will test the efficacy of the investigator-designed website in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) incorporating mixed methods to assess preparedness for lung transplant discussions among people with CF with FEV1 <50% of predicted, and will explore patient and physician perspectives on the use of the new website for lung transplant education in the era of highly effective CF therapeutics. The overall research objectives for the CARING CF Ancillary RCT will focus on addressing caregivers' education needs, caregiver burden, and understanding the patient-caregiver relationship in decision-making. The central hypothesis is that the investigator-designed website will increase caregivers' preparedness to engage in lung transplant discussions, will lead to greater understanding of the role of caregivers during the transplant journey, and will reduce caregiver burden.
The CARING CF study will be an ancillary RCT. Caregiver participants will take baseline surveys within 3 months of their loved one's enrollment in the parent Lung Transplant READY CF 2 RCT. When the patient participant completes the 3-month study visit in the parent RCT, caregiver participants will repeat surveys and then be randomly assigned 1:1 (stratified by patient's original study arm assignment in parent RCT and patient's baseline report of low social support) to access the investigator-designed website or have no website access for the next three months. Surveys will evaluate knowledge about lung transplant, a Likert scale rating of preparedness for lung transplant discussions, mental health, and caregiver burden (using the BASC). At 3 months after being randomly assigned, there will be a study visit that includes repeated surveys. After completion of the final surveys, all caregiver participants will gain access to the investigator-designed website via individual login to the secure research website. Throughout the 3 months of the randomized portion of the study and for a long-term follow up period of up to 4 years, web analytics will be captured at the individual level to determine caregivers' usage patterns for the research website. Caregivers may be invited to participate in an interview after completion of their final surveys. As part of this ancillary RCT, patient participants who choose to enroll will complete surveys related to their perceived social support at baseline, 3 months and 6 months after their enrollment in the parent RCT and may be invited to participate in an interview with their caregiver.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Access to investigator-designed lung transplant education website | Experimental | Behavioral: Investigator-designed lung transplant education websiteAccess to an investigator-designed web-based educational resource with information about lung transplant for three months. |
| No access to lung transplant education website | No intervention | –No access to the investigator-designed lung transplant educational resource. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Identified as a caregiver or loved one of an individual with CF enrolled in the Lung Transplant READY CF 2 parent RCT, or
- An individual with CF enrolled in the Lung Transplant READY CF 2 parent RCT
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- People who are unable to provide informed consent
- Unable to read or understand English or Spanish to complete surveys or access the website (currently only available in English and Spanish)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Investigator-designed lung transplant education websiteCaregiver participants assigned to the intervention will access the investigator-designed educational resource via their login to a secure website. | Behavioural | Access to investigator-designed lung transplant education website |
Primary outcome
Brief Assessment Scale for Caregivers (BASC)
Time frame: Measured at the 3-month and 6-month study visits
The co-primary endpoint is an intention-to-treat assessment of the difference in caregivers' mean change in Brief Assessment Scale for Caregivers (BASC) in the intervention versus control arms of the study from the 3-month to the 6-month study visit using linear mixed models. The BASC is a validated 14-item measure of caregiver burden and includes subscales that reflect positive personal impact (PPI) and negative personal impact (NPI) of caregiving responsibilities. The BASC includes a 4-point Likert scale (scored 0 to 3), with higher scores indicating more burden, and the overall BASC score is an average of the 14 item scores. The BASC has high internal consistency in caregivers for adults with CF (Cronbach's alpha 0.88 for overall BASC and 0.82 for PPI).
Social Support Effectiveness Questionnaire (SSE-Q)
Time frame: Measured at the 3-month and 6-month study visits
A co-primary endpoint is an intention-to-treat assessment of change in patient's Social Support Effectiveness Questionnaire (SSE-Q) from 3 months to 6 months and investigators will compare mean change between patients whose caregivers were randomized to the intervention versus control using linear mixed models. The SSE-Q is a validated 26-item measure of social support with higher scores indicating more effective support. The overall scale ranges from 0 to 80 and each subscale can range from 0 to 20. There are 4 subscales: task support, informational support, emotional support and negative effects of support. The first 15 questions are rated on a 5-point Likert scale and the last questions have yes/no responses. The SSE-Q has not previously been utilized in the CF population.
4 secondary outcomes
Confidence-weighted true false knowledge about lung transplant (14-question investigator-designed survey)
Time frame: Measured at the 3-month and 6-month study visits
Likert-scale rating of preparedness to discuss lung transplant with their loved one (0-4)
Time frame: Measured at the 3-month and 6-month study visits
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8)
Time frame: Measured at the 3-month and 6-month study visits
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) Scale
Time frame: Measured at the 3-month and 6-month study visits
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Dec 2024.
- Background: PubMed 30926322Ramos KJ, Smith PJ, McKone EF, Pilewski JM, Lucy A, Hempstead SE, Tallarico E, Faro A, Rosenbluth DB, Gray AL, Dunitz JM; CF Lung Transplant Referral Guidelines Committee. Lung transplant referral for individuals with cystic fibrosis: Cystic Fibrosis Foundation consensus guidelines. J Cyst Fibros. 2019 May;18(3):321-333. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2019.03.002. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
- Background: PubMed 36173364Hartzler AL, Bartlett LE, Hobler MR, Reid N, Pryor JB, Kapnadak SG, Berry DL, Lober WB, Goss CH, Ramos KJ; Take on Transplant Study Group. Take on transplant: human-centered design of a patient education tool to facilitate informed discussions about lung transplant among people with cystic fibrosis. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Dec 13;30(1):26-37. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac176.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. De-identified individual participant data (IPD) may be shared with other researchers for secondary analyses with the approval of the appropriate Human Subjects Division(s) and the study's principal investigator (PI).
Related trials for Cystic Fibrosis
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History of Bronchiectasis
Bronchiectasis, Cystic Fibrosis
Recruiting
Long-term Evaluation of the SIMEOX Device at Home in Non-cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis
Non-cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis
RecruitingPhase 2
Phase 2 Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of ANG003
Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency (EPI), Cystic Fibrosis (CF)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Vascular Health and Function in Cystic Fibrosis
Cystic Fibrosis, Endothelial Dysfunction
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History of Noncirrhotic Portal Hypertension
Cystic Fibrosis, Immunologic Deficiency Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Kathleen Ramos, MD, MS principal investigator
University of Washington
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Investigator-designed lung transplant education website in people with Cystic Fibrosis, run by University of Washington at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Lauren Bartlett, BS, CCRC (503-583-2869, lrejman@uw.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Brief Assessment Scale for Caregivers (BASC) (time frame: Measured at the 3-month and 6-month study visits). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06032273, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Dec 2024.