Vulva CancerNCT06035068
SLN Mapping and ICG Dye for Vulvar Cancer
An observational study of Vulva Cancer, run by Tufts Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Doctors typically use blue dye to assist in locating and extracting lymph nodes for biopsy. However, this process can prove somewhat challenging for both patients and medical teams due to its need for extensive coordination and the assistance of a nuclear medicine team. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Vulva Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Indocyanine green
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Nov 2025to Jan 2026
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: 10 participants fitting the above criteria at Tufts Medical Center
Who may be able to join
- 18 years of age or older
- Patients with early-stage SCC (diameter <4 cm) of the vulva without suspicious lymph nodes at palpation or imaging who are planned for surgery at Tufts Medical Center.
- Patients with squamous cell carcinoma, depth of invasion > 1mm
- Patients with T1 or T2 tumors (FIGO staging) < 4 cm, not encroaching in urethra or anus with clinically negative inguinofemoral lymph nodes
- Localization and size of the tumor are such that perilesional injection of the tracers at three or four sites is possible
- Preoperative imaging do not show enlarged (<1.5 cm)/ suspicious nodes
- Willing and able to give informed consent
Who cannot join
- Inoperable tumors and tumors with diameter > 4 cm
- Patients with inguinofemoral lymph nodes that are palpable on clinical exam suspicious for metastases or with cytologically proven inguinofemoral lymph node metastases
- Radiologically enlarged (>1.5 cm) inguinofemoral lymph nodes
- Patients with multifocal tumors
- Pregnancy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Katina Robison, MD contact
United States1 site
Tufts Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02111
Alysa St. Charles, MA, 617-636-9897, alysa.st.charles@tuftsmedicine.org
Rafael Gonzalez, MD
About this study
Official title: Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping and Detection With Indocyanine Green and Spy-Phi Handheld Camera Technology in Early-Stage Vulvar Cancer (PILOT)
Doctors typically use blue dye to assist in locating and extracting lymph nodes for biopsy. However, this process can prove somewhat challenging for both patients and medical teams due to its need for extensive coordination and the assistance of a nuclear medicine team. Some studies have talked about using a different method to find these lymph nodes using a special dye called Indocyanine Green (ICG). This method involves shining a special camera on the skin. So far, no studies have directly compared the ICG method to the standard blue dye. The ICG camera could make things easier for patients and doctors, and more patients might choose to have their lymph nodes checked with this new method. The goal of our study is to see if using the ICG dye is just as good as the standard method of blue dye.
- Conditions
- Vulva Cancer
- Being tested
- Indocyanine green
- Medical subject headings
- Vulvar Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Indocyanine greenDrug
Also called ICG dye
Indocyanine green (ICG) is a fluorescent dye that has been used for the imaging of cancers in the body for more than 30 years.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Combined ICG dye and blue tracer dye | This study is being done to see if a different way of finding and removing lymph nodes during surgery, using a special camera and a dye called Indocyanine Green (ICG), works as well as the usual method with blue dye plus a radioactive tracer called radiocolloid. By comparing the two ways directly, we hope to make it simpler for people with vulvar cancer to get their lymph nodes checked during surgery. Receives: Drug: Indocyanine green |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Detection Rate of SLNs using ICG Dye vs Blue Dye at Patient Level
- Report the detection rate of SLNs using ICG dye for sentinel lymph node mapping.
- Report the detection rate of SLNs using blue dye for sentinel lymph node mapping.
- Compare the two detection rates using a chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test, depending on the sample size.
Measured: Data collection at time of surgery
Clustered Analysis at the Hemi-Pelvis Level
- Use generalized estimating equations (GEE) or mixed-effects logistic regression models to account for the clustering effect.
- Include a random effect for each patient to address the correlation between SLNs within the same patient's hemi-pelvis.
- Assess the significance of dye type using the Wald test or likelihood ratio test.
- Report odds ratios, confidence intervals, and p-values for the effect of dye type on SLN detection.
Measured: Data collection at time of surgery
3. Difference in SLNs Detected in Blue vs Green Dye when Data is Clustered at Hemi-Pelvis Level
- Report the proportion of SLNs detected using blue dye in each hemi-pelvis.
- Report the proportion of SLNs detected using ICG dye in each hemi-pelvis.
- Use a paired t-test or Mcnemar's test to compare the proportions within each hemi-pelvis.
- Account for the clustering effect by using mixed-effects models
Measured: Data collection at time of surgery
Secondary outcomes (1)
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Negative Predictive Value of ICG Dye vs Standard Blue Dye
- Create a 2x2 contingency table for sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value.
- Sensitivity = (True Positives) / (True Positives + False Negatives).
- Specificity = (True Negatives) / (True Negatives + False Positives).
- Negative Predictive Value = (True Negatives) / (True Negatives + False Negatives).
Measured: Data collection at time of surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Sep 2023
- Study start1 Nov 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completionDec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completionJan 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Vulva CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Tufts Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Rafael Gonzalez, MD, Principal investigator, Tufts Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06035068
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STUDY00004163
- Status last verified
- Sep 2025
- First submitted
- 6 Sep 2023
- Last updated
- 29 Sep 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Te Grootenhuis NC, van der Zee AG, van Doorn HC, van der Velden J, Vergote I, Zanagnolo V, Baldwin PJ, Gaarenstroom KN, van Dorst EB, Trum JW, Slangen BF, Runnebaum IB, Tamussino K, Hermans RH, Provencher DM, de Bock GH, de Hullu JA, Oonk MH. Sentinel nodes in vulvar cancer: Long-term follow-up of the GROningen INternational Study on Sentinel nodes in Vulvar cancer (GROINSS-V) I. Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Jan;140(1):8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.09.077. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
PubMed 26428940Covens A, Vella ET, Kennedy EB, Reade CJ, Jimenez W, Le T. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in vulvar cancer: Systematic review, meta-analysis and guideline recommendations. Gynecol Oncol. 2015 May;137(2):351-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.02.014. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
PubMed 25703673Hutteman M, van der Vorst JR, Gaarenstroom KN, Peters AA, Mieog JS, Schaafsma BE, Lowik CW, Frangioni JV, van de Velde CJ, Vahrmeijer AL. Optimization of near-infrared fluorescent sentinel lymph node mapping for vulvar cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jan;206(1):89.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.07.039. Epub 2011 Jul 30.
PubMed 21963099Crane LM, Themelis G, Arts HJ, Buddingh KT, Brouwers AH, Ntziachristos V, van Dam GM, van der Zee AG. Intraoperative near-infrared fluorescence imaging for sentinel lymph node detection in vulvar cancer: first clinical results. Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Feb;120(2):291-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.10.009. Epub 2010 Nov 6.
PubMed 21056907
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Sep 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping and Detection With Indocyanine Green and Spy-Phi Handheld Camera Technology in Early-Stage Vulvar Cancer (PILOT)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06035068
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STUDY00004163
- Conditions
- Vulva Cancer
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Tufts Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Nov 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jan 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 13 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Doctors typically use blue dye to assist in locating and extracting lymph nodes for biopsy. However, this process can prove somewhat challenging for both patients and medical teams due to its need for extensive coordination and the assistance of a nuclear medicine team. Some studies have talked about using a different method to find these lymph nodes using a special dye called Indocyanine Green (ICG). This method involves shining a special camera on the skin. So far, no studies have directly compared the ICG method to the standard blue dye. The ICG camera could make things easier for patients and doctors, and more patients might choose to have their lymph nodes checked with this new method. The goal of our study is to see if using the ICG dye is just as good as the standard method of blue dye.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Combined ICG dye and blue tracer dye | – | Drug: Indocyanine greenThis study is being done to see if a different way of finding and removing lymph nodes during surgery, using a special camera and a dye called Indocyanine Green (ICG), works as well as the usual method with blue dye plus a radioactive tracer called radiocolloid. By comparing the two ways directly, we hope to make it simpler for people with vulvar cancer to get their lymph nodes checked during surgery. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- 10 participants fitting the above criteria at Tufts Medical Center
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- 18 years of age or older
- Patients with early-stage SCC (diameter <4 cm) of the vulva without suspicious lymph nodes at palpation or imaging who are planned for surgery at Tufts Medical Center.
- Patients with squamous cell carcinoma, depth of invasion > 1mm
- Patients with T1 or T2 tumors (FIGO staging) < 4 cm, not encroaching in urethra or anus with clinically negative inguinofemoral lymph nodes
- Localization and size of the tumor are such that perilesional injection of the tracers at three or four sites is possible
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Inoperable tumors and tumors with diameter > 4 cm
- Patients with inguinofemoral lymph nodes that are palpable on clinical exam suspicious for metastases or with cytologically proven inguinofemoral lymph node metastases
- Radiologically enlarged (>1.5 cm) inguinofemoral lymph nodes
- Patients with multifocal tumors
- Pregnancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Indocyanine greenAlso: ICG dyeIndocyanine green (ICG) is a fluorescent dye that has been used for the imaging of cancers in the body for more than 30 years. | Drug | Combined ICG dye and blue tracer dye |
Primary outcome
Detection Rate of SLNs using ICG Dye vs Blue Dye at Patient Level
Time frame: Data collection at time of surgery
* Report the detection rate of SLNs using ICG dye for sentinel lymph node mapping. * Report the detection rate of SLNs using blue dye for sentinel lymph node mapping. * Compare the two detection rates using a chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test, depending on the sample size.
Clustered Analysis at the Hemi-Pelvis Level
Time frame: Data collection at time of surgery
* Use generalized estimating equations (GEE) or mixed-effects logistic regression models to account for the clustering effect. * Include a random effect for each patient to address the correlation between SLNs within the same patient's hemi-pelvis. * Assess the significance of dye type using the Wald test or likelihood ratio test. * Report odds ratios, confidence intervals, and p-values for the effect of dye type on SLN detection.
3. Difference in SLNs Detected in Blue vs Green Dye when Data is Clustered at Hemi-Pelvis Level
Time frame: Data collection at time of surgery
* Report the proportion of SLNs detected using blue dye in each hemi-pelvis. * Report the proportion of SLNs detected using ICG dye in each hemi-pelvis. * Use a paired t-test or Mcnemar's test to compare the proportions within each hemi-pelvis. * Account for the clustering effect by using mixed-effects models
1 secondary outcome
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Negative Predictive Value of ICG Dye vs Standard Blue Dye
Time frame: Data collection at time of surgery
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Sep 2025.
- Background: PubMed 26428940Te Grootenhuis NC, van der Zee AG, van Doorn HC, van der Velden J, Vergote I, Zanagnolo V, Baldwin PJ, Gaarenstroom KN, van Dorst EB, Trum JW, Slangen BF, Runnebaum IB, Tamussino K, Hermans RH, Provencher DM, de Bock GH, de Hullu JA, Oonk MH. Sentinel nodes in vulvar cancer: Long-term follow-up of the GROningen INternational Study on Sentinel nodes in Vulvar cancer (GROINSS-V) I. Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Jan;140(1):8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.09.077. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
- Background: PubMed 25703673Covens A, Vella ET, Kennedy EB, Reade CJ, Jimenez W, Le T. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in vulvar cancer: Systematic review, meta-analysis and guideline recommendations. Gynecol Oncol. 2015 May;137(2):351-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.02.014. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
- Background: PubMed 21963099Hutteman M, van der Vorst JR, Gaarenstroom KN, Peters AA, Mieog JS, Schaafsma BE, Lowik CW, Frangioni JV, van de Velde CJ, Vahrmeijer AL. Optimization of near-infrared fluorescent sentinel lymph node mapping for vulvar cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jan;206(1):89.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.07.039. Epub 2011 Jul 30.
- Background: PubMed 21056907Crane LM, Themelis G, Arts HJ, Buddingh KT, Brouwers AH, Ntziachristos V, van Dam GM, van der Zee AG. Intraoperative near-infrared fluorescence imaging for sentinel lymph node detection in vulvar cancer: first clinical results. Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Feb;120(2):291-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.10.009. Epub 2010 Nov 6.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Vulva Cancer
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Study of Near-Infrared Imaging With Indocyanine Green for Detection of Sentinel Lymph Nodes in People With Vulvar Cancer
Vulvar Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
Active, not recruiting
e-Health Intervention (Day-by-Day) for the Management of Fear of Progression in Women With Stage III or IV Gynecologic Cancer: A Pilot Study
Malignant Female Reproductive System Neoplasm, Stage III Cervical Cancer AJCC v8
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Three-arm Randomized Phase II Study of Dostarlimab Alone or With Bevacizumab Versus Nonplatinum Chemotherapy in Recurrent Gynecological Clear Cell Carcinoma: DOVE (APGOT-OV7/ ENGOT-ov80 Study)
Ovarian Neoplasms, Endometrial Neoplasms
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Katina Robison, MD contact
Rafael Gonzalez, MD principal investigator
Tufts Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Vulva Cancer, run by Tufts Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Rafael Gonzalez, MD (617-636-6058, rafael.gonzalez@tuftsmedicine.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Detection Rate of SLNs using ICG Dye vs Blue Dye at Patient Level (time frame: Data collection at time of surgery). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06035068, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Sep 2025.