Concussion, BrainCHIPNCT06036147
Concussion Health Improvement Program
A study testing Concussion-focused cognitive behavioral therapy, Parent skills training and Care management in people with Concussion, Brain and Brain Injury Traumatic Mild, run by Seattle Children's Hospital at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
More than 1 million U.S. youth sustain a concussion each year, and up to 30% report persistent post-concussive symptoms (PPCS) lasting 1 month or more. PPCS can interfere with normal adolescent development, resulting in issues with socioemotional dysfunction and even school failure. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 11 to 18 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Concussion, Brain, Brain Injury Traumatic Mild
- What is being tested?
- Concussion-focused cognitive behavioral therapy, Parent skills training and Care management
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 304 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 10 Nov 2023to 31 Jan 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 11 to 18 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- 11-18 years old
- Health care provider diagnosed concussion within 1-12 months
- ≥ 3 new onset or worsening post-concussive symptoms (measured with the HBI)
- Can be located anywhere as study is all completed remotely
Who cannot join
- Active suicidal ideation, diagnosis of psychosis or psychiatric hospitalization within 6 months
- Spinal cord injury or other severe injury or illness that might impede participation
- Youth or parent not fluent in Spanish or English
- Chronic illness or medical conditions that prevent participation in concussion-focused treatment
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Carolyn McCarty, PhD contact
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
University of Texas Southwestern (UTSW)
Dallas, Texas, 75390
Nyaz Didehbani, PhD
Nyaz Didehbani, PhD
About this study
Official title: Optimizing Collaborative Care for Youth With Persistent Post-Concussive Symptoms
More than 1 million U.S. youth sustain a concussion each year, and up to 30% report persistent post-concussive symptoms (PPCS) lasting 1 month or more. PPCS can interfere with normal adolescent development, resulting in issues with socioemotional dysfunction and even school failure. However, few evidence based treatments are available for youth with PPCS. The investigators conducted extensive work adapting a collaborative care framework for youth with PPCS, combining concussion-focused cognitive behavioral therapy (cf-CBT), parent skills training (PST) and care management (CM) to create a wraparound treatment for youth with PPCS that can be delivered either in-person or virtually. They completed an R01-funded randomized controlled trial with this approach, finding effectiveness for youth with PPCS, with improvements in concussive symptoms and quality of life at one year, and 60% of participants completing the intervention entirely virtually. Of note, this intervention is unique in that two of the components are focused on parents or parents and youth together (PST, CM), and only one of the components (cf-CBT) is solely youth focused. The investigators now propose to optimize and refine this approach, conducting a high efficiency MOST (multiphase optimization strategy) trial to assess the contribution of each of the three components (cf-CBT, PST and CM) to effectiveness, thereby enabling streamlining of the intervention to only include active components. The analysis will be factorial, with three intervention components and two levels of each (present or absent), resulting in 8 treatment pathways. The benefit of the MOST approach is that it combines all youth who receive a component, allowing assessment of all treatment components with only a modest sample size. The study will recruit 374 youth with PPCS, randomizing them to one of 8 treatment groups. Youth and/or parents will attend treatment sessions via video conferencing software over three months, and complete surveys regarding primary outcomes (concussive symptoms and health-related quality of life) and secondary outcomes (sleep, pain, mood and parental distress) at 6 weeks, and 3, 6 and 12 months. Potential mediators and moderators will also be assessed to allow for future tailoring and refinement. At the completion of this study, the investigators will have generated a completely optimized and refined intervention for youth with PPCS ready for large scale implementation and dissemination.
Read the detailed description
Concussion is common among adolescents, affecting up to 1.9 million U.S. youth per year. Although many youth recover quickly, up to 30% experience difficulty concentrating, headache, sleep disruption and other symptoms extending one month or longer, characterized as persistent post-concussive symptoms (PPCS). Youth with PPCS can have symptoms for months, leading to declines in academic function and quality of life, as well as excessive healthcare costs. Research indicates mental health comorbidity is linked to greater likelihood of prolonged concussive symptoms, however evidence regarding mental health interventions for PPCS is still developing and mental health approaches are not included in the standard of care. The investigators successfully adapted and tested a mental health intervention for youth with PPCS involving collaborative care (CC) delivery of youth concussion-focused cognitive-behavioral therapy (cf-CBT), parenting skills training (PST) and care management (CM), with medication guidance as needed. We completed an R01 level randomized controlled trial of the CC approach for youth with PPCS, finding evidence for long-term gains; those receiving CC had improvements at 12 months in concussion symptoms (Cohen's d=0.32) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) (Cohen's d=0.29) compared to usual care. Perhaps most importantly, more than half of families (60%) completed the intervention entirely virtually, expanding accessibility. While our multicomponent CC approach was effective, research suggests duration and complexity of evidence-based mental health interventions affect the likelihood of successful implementation and dissemination.
The investigators are now striving to optimize the CC approach by assessing the contribution of each component in order to increase efficiency and scalability while maximizing effectiveness. They have chosen to view the CC intervention treatment effects using the frame of the Socioecological Model,16 postulating that cf-CBT targets the individual level, PST targets the interpersonal level (i.e., relationships with parents) and CM targets the organizational level (i.e., linkages to medical, school, and other services). They have also worked to amplify each component, noting in previous trials that concussive symptoms, sleep and HRQoL improved significantly in the intervention group compared to usual care, without a concomitant improvement in headache. In response, they increased the focus on skills for managing headache in the cf-CBT and PST components, with the guidance of a pain psychologist. They also increased the rigor and structure of all components with greater oversight regarding delivery and duration. The next step is to assess the separate contribution of each different leveled component (cf-CBT, PST and CM) to determine their impact on youth and parent outcomes.
The investigators propose to conduct an optimization trial with the CC approach for youth with PPCS, utilizing a highly efficient analytic approach, the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST).The design will be factorial, with three components (cf-CBT, PST and CM) each with two levels (present or absent). They will recruit adolescents aged 11-18 with PPCS lasting at least 1 month from outpatient clinics, randomizing families to one of 8 groups to assess all combinations of treatment components. Families will participate in sessions virtually and complete surveys at 3, 6 and 12 months to measure proximal and distal outcomes. They will examine potential mechanisms of action for each component and explore differential effectiveness across baseline factors via moderation. They will sample youth from two distinct geographic regions to enhance diversity and improve generalizability.
Aim 1. Determine which components of the CC approach (cf-CBT, PST and CM) contribute significantly to improvements in distal outcomes, particularly concussive symptoms and youth HRQoL, among a diverse sample of youth with PPCS.
1a. Examine the effect of intervention components on proximal outcomes including youth headache, mood and sleep, and parental distress regarding their child's illness.
Aim 2. Assess potential mediation of intervention component effects by postulated mechanistic factors including improvements in a) youth self-efficacy, b) parental protectiveness and c) parental self-efficacy regarding navigating their child's concussion care.
Aim 3. Explore moderation of intervention component effects by demographic (parental education level, youth race/ethnicity, youth sex) and clinical factors (youth depression and level of parent emotional distress).
The proposed study will advance concussion research by continuing to refine an evidence-based intervention for youth with PPCS that addresses mental health, while engaging both parents and youth. It will also elucidate the scientific understanding of how the intervention works, and for whom. The end product of this research will be a PPCS intervention optimized for effectiveness and efficiency that will form the basis for a future hybrid implementation effectiveness trial.
- Conditions
- Concussion, Brain, Brain Injury Traumatic Mild
- Being tested
- Concussion-focused cognitive behavioral therapy, Parent skills training, Care management
- Medical subject headings
- Brain Concussion
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Concussion-focused cognitive behavioral therapyBehavioural
Also called cf-CBT
Youth randomized to receive this component will participate in six 30-minute sessions of cf-CBT. The intervention includes modular CBT targeting post-concussive, anxiety and depressive symptoms. In this CBT treatment, the adolescent can be taught coping skills, relaxation strategies, and cognitive strategies to manage their symptoms, while they are encouraged to increase appropriate activation, including pacing of activities. Six sessions from the CHIP Study Cognitive and Behavioral Skills for Concussion Recovery will be chosen by the interventionist based on the youth's goals in the Introduction Session.
Parent skills trainingBehavioural
Also called PST
The focus of the PST component is on the use of positive parenting skills as well as helping parents manage their own emotional distress. Parents are taught to set positive recovery expectations, and to use praise or attention to increase their teen's positive coping behaviors and decrease unhelpful coping behaviors. They are also taught positive communication skills to use with their teen, and guided to schedule pleasant events together in order to strengthen the relationship. In-vivo skills practice and feedback are provided to help parents generalize and use PST techniques. Parents randomized to receive this component will participate in six 30-minute sessions of PST, chosen from the CHIP Study Parent Support Skills Training for Concussion recovery based on the parent's goals in the Introduction Session.
Care managementBehavioural
Also called CM
In the CM component, parents are provided support regarding advocating for their child's needs across different contexts in the healthcare system, school and athletic departments (including guidance regarding medication referrals), using applied problem-solving together with the skills coach to address emergent needs. Adolescents can also be involved in CM, if developmentally appropriate based on their age, independence, and interest. Of note, while the CM component engages youth and parents, treatment effects are hypothesized to result from facilitating access to supportive services including medication referrals at the organizational level. Families randomized to receive this component will participate in six 30-minute sessions of CM, following the guidelines in the CHIP Care Management Manual.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Pathway 1 | Experimental | All interventions: cf-CBT, PST \& CM Receives: Behavioral: Concussion-focused cognitive behavioral therapy; Behavioral: Parent skills training; Behavioral: Care management |
| Pathway 2 | Experimental | cf-CBT \& PST Receives: Behavioral: Concussion-focused cognitive behavioral therapy; Behavioral: Parent skills training |
| Pathway 3 | Experimental | cf-CBT \& CM Receives: Behavioral: Concussion-focused cognitive behavioral therapy; Behavioral: Care management |
| Pathway 4 | Experimental | cf-CBT only Receives: Behavioral: Parent skills training; Behavioral: Care management |
| Pathway 5 | Experimental | PST \& CM Receives: Behavioral: Concussion-focused cognitive behavioral therapy |
| Pathway 6 | Experimental | PST only Receives: Behavioral: Parent skills training |
| Pathway 7 | Experimental | CM only Receives: Behavioral: Care management |
| Pathway 8 | No intervention | No interventions |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Health Behavior Inventory (HBI)
A 20-item questionnaire that assesses concussive symptoms on a 4-point scale, ranging from "never" to "often," and yields total scores in cognitive and somatic domains. The scale includes youth-report and parent-report versions with established reliability and validity in youth with sports-injury. Possible scores range from 0-60 with higher indicating more symptomatic (i.e., worse).
Measured: Trajectory over one year (baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year)
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL)
A 23-item questionnaire that assesses physical, emotional, social and school functioning. The scale includes youth-report and parent-report versions. Possible scores range from 0- 100 with 100 indicating higher quality of life (i.e., better).
Measured: Trajectory over one year (baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year)
Secondary outcomes (6)
Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 item (GAD-7)
A 7-item measure of youth anxiety symptoms during the prior two weeks on a 4-point scale.Possible scores range from 0-21 with higher indicating more symptomatic (i.e., worse).
Measured: Trajectory over one year (baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year)
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 item (PHQ-9)
A 9-item questionnaire that measures severity of depressive symptoms. Reliability and validity of the PHQ-9 have been established in pediatric populations with injury. Possible scores range from 0-27 with higher indicating more symptomatic (i.e., worse).
Measured: Trajectory over one year (baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year)
Adolescent Sleep Wake Scale-10 item (ASWS-10)
A measure of sleep quality including domains of falling asleep, reinitiating sleep and returning to wakefulness. For scoring several items are reversed and then an average score is calculated. Possible scores range from 1-6 with higher indicating better sleep quality.
Measured: Trajectory over one year (baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year)
Pediatric Inventory for Parents (PIP)
15 item scale measuring parent distress regarding their child's illness, each on a scale of 1-5. Possible scores range from 15-75 with higher scores indicating increased emotional distress.
Measured: Trajectory over one year (baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year)
Headache daily diary
7 day diary measuring headache occurrence and severity (0-10) daily. Completing these measures will provide two scores, each 0-10 with higher numbers indicating worse symptoms.
Measured: Trajectory over one year (baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year)
Mood daily diary
7 day diary measuring mood valence (0= very negative to 10= very positive) and energy. level (0=very low energy to 10= very high energy level). Completing these times will result in two scores, each 0-10. For mood valence, lower numbers will indicate more negative mood (i.e., worse). For energy level, lower numbers will indicate lower energy (defined as worse or better dependent on the valence of the mood it refers to).
Measured: Trajectory over one year (baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Sep 2023
- Study start10 Nov 2023
- Primary completion31 Jan 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Jan 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Concussion, BrainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Model description
- Youth are randomized into one of 8 pathways which are all combinations of three intervention approaches.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 304 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Seattle Children's Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, University of Washington
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Sara PD Chrisman, MD MPH, Seattle Children's Hospital
- Investigators
- Sara P Chrisman, MD MPH, Principal investigator, Seattle Children's HospitalCarolyn A McCarty, PhD, Principal investigator, Seattle Children's Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06036147
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 00004199
- Other IDs
- R01HD090230
- Acronym
- CHIP
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 6 Sep 2023
- Last updated
- 13 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
McCarty CA, Zatzick D, Stein E, Wang J, Hilt R, Rivara FP; Seattle Sports Concussion Research Collaborative. Collaborative Care for Adolescents With Persistent Postconcussive Symptoms: A Randomized Trial. Pediatrics. 2016 Oct;138(4):e20160459. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-0459. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
PubMed 27624513McCarty CA, Zatzick DF, Marcynyszyn LA, Wang J, Hilt R, Jinguji T, Quitiquit C, Chrisman SPD, Rivara FP. Effect of Collaborative Care on Persistent Postconcussive Symptoms in Adolescents: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e210207. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.0207.
PubMed 33635325McCarty CA, Hennings T, Zhou C, Law EF, Zatzick D, Chrisman SPD. Concussion Health Improvement Program (CHIP): study protocol for a randomized controlled optimization trial for youth with persistent post-concussive symptoms. Trials. 2024 Oct 9;25(1):668. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08494-y.
PubMed 39385279
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Optimizing Collaborative Care for Youth With Persistent Post-Concussive Symptoms
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06036147
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CHIP / 00004199
- Conditions
- Concussion, Brain, Brain Injury Traumatic Mild
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 304 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Seattle Children's HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, University of Washington
- Study start
- 10 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jan 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Jan 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 13 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
More than 1 million U.S. youth sustain a concussion each year, and up to 30% report persistent post-concussive symptoms (PPCS) lasting 1 month or more. PPCS can interfere with normal adolescent development, resulting in issues with socioemotional dysfunction and even school failure. However, few evidence based treatments are available for youth with PPCS. The investigators conducted extensive work adapting a collaborative care framework for youth with PPCS, combining concussion-focused cognitive behavioral therapy (cf-CBT), parent skills training (PST) and care management (CM) to create a wraparound treatment for youth with PPCS that can be delivered either in-person or virtually. They completed an R01-funded randomized controlled trial with this approach, finding effectiveness for youth with PPCS, with improvements in concussive symptoms and quality of life at one year, and 60% of participants completing the intervention entirely virtually. Of note, this intervention is unique in that two of the components are focused on parents or parents and youth together (PST, CM), and only one of the components (cf-CBT) is solely youth focused. The investigators now propose to optimize and refine this approach, conducting a high efficiency MOST (multiphase optimization strategy) trial to assess the contribution of each of the three components (cf-CBT, PST and CM) to effectiveness, thereby enabling streamlining of the intervention to only include active components. The analysis will be factorial, with three intervention components and two levels of each (present or absent), resulting in 8 treatment pathways. The benefit of the MOST approach is that it combines all youth who receive a component, allowing assessment of all treatment components with only a modest sample size. The study will recruit 374 youth with PPCS, randomizing them to one of 8 treatment groups. Youth and/or parents will attend treatment sessions via video conferencing software over three months, and complete surveys regarding primary outcomes (concussive symptoms and health-related quality of life) and secondary outcomes (sleep, pain, mood and parental distress) at 6 weeks, and 3, 6 and 12 months. Potential mediators and moderators will also be assessed to allow for future tailoring and refinement. At the completion of this study, the investigators will have generated a completely optimized and refined intervention for youth with PPCS ready for large scale implementation and dissemination.
Detailed description
Concussion is common among adolescents, affecting up to 1.9 million U.S. youth per year. Although many youth recover quickly, up to 30% experience difficulty concentrating, headache, sleep disruption and other symptoms extending one month or longer, characterized as persistent post-concussive symptoms (PPCS). Youth with PPCS can have symptoms for months, leading to declines in academic function and quality of life, as well as excessive healthcare costs. Research indicates mental health comorbidity is linked to greater likelihood of prolonged concussive symptoms, however evidence regarding mental health interventions for PPCS is still developing and mental health approaches are not included in the standard of care. The investigators successfully adapted and tested a mental health intervention for youth with PPCS involving collaborative care (CC) delivery of youth concussion-focused cognitive-behavioral therapy (cf-CBT), parenting skills training (PST) and care management (CM), with medication guidance as needed. We completed an R01 level randomized controlled trial of the CC approach for youth with PPCS, finding evidence for long-term gains; those receiving CC had improvements at 12 months in concussion symptoms (Cohen's d=0.32) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) (Cohen's d=0.29) compared to usual care. Perhaps most importantly, more than half of families (60%) completed the intervention entirely virtually, expanding accessibility. While our multicomponent CC approach was effective, research suggests duration and complexity of evidence-based mental health interventions affect the likelihood of successful implementation and dissemination.
The investigators are now striving to optimize the CC approach by assessing the contribution of each component in order to increase efficiency and scalability while maximizing effectiveness. They have chosen to view the CC intervention treatment effects using the frame of the Socioecological Model,16 postulating that cf-CBT targets the individual level, PST targets the interpersonal level (i.e., relationships with parents) and CM targets the organizational level (i.e., linkages to medical, school, and other services). They have also worked to amplify each component, noting in previous trials that concussive symptoms, sleep and HRQoL improved significantly in the intervention group compared to usual care, without a concomitant improvement in headache. In response, they increased the focus on skills for managing headache in the cf-CBT and PST components, with the guidance of a pain psychologist. They also increased the rigor and structure of all components with greater oversight regarding delivery and duration. The next step is to assess the separate contribution of each different leveled component (cf-CBT, PST and CM) to determine their impact on youth and parent outcomes.
The investigators propose to conduct an optimization trial with the CC approach for youth with PPCS, utilizing a highly efficient analytic approach, the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST).The design will be factorial, with three components (cf-CBT, PST and CM) each with two levels (present or absent). They will recruit adolescents aged 11-18 with PPCS lasting at least 1 month from outpatient clinics, randomizing families to one of 8 groups to assess all combinations of treatment components. Families will participate in sessions virtually and complete surveys at 3, 6 and 12 months to measure proximal and distal outcomes. They will examine potential mechanisms of action for each component and explore differential effectiveness across baseline factors via moderation. They will sample youth from two distinct geographic regions to enhance diversity and improve generalizability.
Aim 1. Determine which components of the CC approach (cf-CBT, PST and CM) contribute significantly to improvements in distal outcomes, particularly concussive symptoms and youth HRQoL, among a diverse sample of youth with PPCS.
1a. Examine the effect of intervention components on proximal outcomes including youth headache, mood and sleep, and parental distress regarding their child's illness.
Aim 2. Assess potential mediation of intervention component effects by postulated mechanistic factors including improvements in a) youth self-efficacy, b) parental protectiveness and c) parental self-efficacy regarding navigating their child's concussion care.
Aim 3. Explore moderation of intervention component effects by demographic (parental education level, youth race/ethnicity, youth sex) and clinical factors (youth depression and level of parent emotional distress).
The proposed study will advance concussion research by continuing to refine an evidence-based intervention for youth with PPCS that addresses mental health, while engaging both parents and youth. It will also elucidate the scientific understanding of how the intervention works, and for whom. The end product of this research will be a PPCS intervention optimized for effectiveness and efficiency that will form the basis for a future hybrid implementation effectiveness trial.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 8
- Model description
- Youth are randomized into one of 8 pathways which are all combinations of three intervention approaches.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Pathway 1 | Experimental | Behavioral: Concussion-focused cognitive behavioral therapy, Behavioral: Parent skills training, Behavioral: Care managementAll interventions: cf-CBT, PST \& CM |
| Pathway 2 | Experimental | Behavioral: Concussion-focused cognitive behavioral therapy, Behavioral: Parent skills trainingcf-CBT \& PST |
| Pathway 3 | Experimental | Behavioral: Concussion-focused cognitive behavioral therapy, Behavioral: Care managementcf-CBT \& CM |
| Pathway 4 | Experimental | Behavioral: Parent skills training, Behavioral: Care managementcf-CBT only |
| Pathway 5 | Experimental | Behavioral: Concussion-focused cognitive behavioral therapyPST \& CM |
| Pathway 6 | Experimental | Behavioral: Parent skills trainingPST only |
| Pathway 7 | Experimental | Behavioral: Care managementCM only |
| Pathway 8 | No intervention | –No interventions |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 11 to 18 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- 11-18 years old
- Health care provider diagnosed concussion within 1-12 months
- ≥ 3 new onset or worsening post-concussive symptoms (measured with the HBI)
- Can be located anywhere as study is all completed remotely
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Active suicidal ideation, diagnosis of psychosis or psychiatric hospitalization within 6 months
- Spinal cord injury or other severe injury or illness that might impede participation
- Youth or parent not fluent in Spanish or English
- Chronic illness or medical conditions that prevent participation in concussion-focused treatment
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Concussion-focused cognitive behavioral therapyAlso: cf-CBTYouth randomized to receive this component will participate in six 30-minute sessions of cf-CBT. The intervention includes modular CBT targeting post-concussive, anxiety and depressive symptoms. In this CBT treatment, the adolescent can be taught coping skills, relaxation strategies, and cognitive strategies to manage their symptoms, while they are encouraged to increase appropriate activation, including pacing of activities. Six sessions from the CHIP Study Cognitive and Behavioral Skills for Concussion Recovery will be chosen by the interventionist based on the youth's goals in the Introduction Session. | Behavioural | Pathway 1, Pathway 2, Pathway 3, Pathway 5 |
| Parent skills trainingAlso: PSTThe focus of the PST component is on the use of positive parenting skills as well as helping parents manage their own emotional distress. Parents are taught to set positive recovery expectations, and to use praise or attention to increase their teen's positive coping behaviors and decrease unhelpful coping behaviors. They are also taught positive communication skills to use with their teen, and guided to schedule pleasant events together in order to strengthen the relationship. In-vivo skills practice and feedback are provided to help parents generalize and use PST techniques. Parents randomized to receive this component will participate in six 30-minute sessions of PST, chosen from the CHIP Study Parent Support Skills Training for Concussion recovery based on the parent's goals in the Introduction Session. | Behavioural | Pathway 1, Pathway 2, Pathway 4, Pathway 6 |
| Care managementAlso: CMIn the CM component, parents are provided support regarding advocating for their child's needs across different contexts in the healthcare system, school and athletic departments (including guidance regarding medication referrals), using applied problem-solving together with the skills coach to address emergent needs. Adolescents can also be involved in CM, if developmentally appropriate based on their age, independence, and interest. Of note, while the CM component engages youth and parents, treatment effects are hypothesized to result from facilitating access to supportive services including medication referrals at the organizational level. Families randomized to receive this component will participate in six 30-minute sessions of CM, following the guidelines in the CHIP Care Management Manual. | Behavioural | Pathway 1, Pathway 3, Pathway 4, Pathway 7 |
Primary outcome
Health Behavior Inventory (HBI)
Time frame: Trajectory over one year (baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year)
A 20-item questionnaire that assesses concussive symptoms on a 4-point scale, ranging from "never" to "often," and yields total scores in cognitive and somatic domains. The scale includes youth-report and parent-report versions with established reliability and validity in youth with sports-injury. Possible scores range from 0-60 with higher indicating more symptomatic (i.e., worse).
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL)
Time frame: Trajectory over one year (baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year)
A 23-item questionnaire that assesses physical, emotional, social and school functioning. The scale includes youth-report and parent-report versions. Possible scores range from 0- 100 with 100 indicating higher quality of life (i.e., better).
6 secondary outcomes
Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 item (GAD-7)
Time frame: Trajectory over one year (baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year)
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 item (PHQ-9)
Time frame: Trajectory over one year (baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year)
Adolescent Sleep Wake Scale-10 item (ASWS-10)
Time frame: Trajectory over one year (baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year)
Pediatric Inventory for Parents (PIP)
Time frame: Trajectory over one year (baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year)
Headache daily diary
Time frame: Trajectory over one year (baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year)
Mood daily diary
Time frame: Trajectory over one year (baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Mar 2025.
- Background: PubMed 27624513McCarty CA, Zatzick D, Stein E, Wang J, Hilt R, Rivara FP; Seattle Sports Concussion Research Collaborative. Collaborative Care for Adolescents With Persistent Postconcussive Symptoms: A Randomized Trial. Pediatrics. 2016 Oct;138(4):e20160459. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-0459. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
- Background: PubMed 33635325McCarty CA, Zatzick DF, Marcynyszyn LA, Wang J, Hilt R, Jinguji T, Quitiquit C, Chrisman SPD, Rivara FP. Effect of Collaborative Care on Persistent Postconcussive Symptoms in Adolescents: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e210207. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.0207.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39385279McCarty CA, Hennings T, Zhou C, Law EF, Zatzick D, Chrisman SPD. Concussion Health Improvement Program (CHIP): study protocol for a randomized controlled optimization trial for youth with persistent post-concussive symptoms. Trials. 2024 Oct 9;25(1):668. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08494-y.
- Study websiteLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Concussion, Brain
Not yet recruiting
Supplementary Neuromuscular Rehabilitation During Acute Concussion Recovery
Concussion (Diagnosis), Gait Abnormality
Not yet recruiting
Electroencephalography Markers of Brain Stimulation in Post-Concussion Patients
Patients With Persistent Post-concussion Symptoms
RecruitingPhase 1
Rehabilitation Through Virtual Immersion & Integrated Exposure for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (ReVIVE for mTBI)
Traumatic Brain Injuries, TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Cognitive Effects of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT) After a Traumatic Brain Injury
Traumatic Brain Injury, Post-Concussion Syndrome
Recruiting
Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Field Stimulation (PENFS) in Patients With Post Concussion Syndrome (PCS)
Post-Concussion Syndrome, COVID Long-Haul
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Carolyn McCarty, PhD contact
Sara P Chrisman, MD MPH principal investigator
Seattle Children's Hospital
Carolyn A McCarty, PhD principal investigator
Seattle Children's Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Concussion-focused cognitive behavioral therapy, Parent skills training and Care management in people with Concussion, Brain and Brain Injury Traumatic Mild, run by Seattle Children's Hospital at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Sara P Chrisman, MD MPH ((206) 987-2028, chip@seattlechildrens.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Health Behavior Inventory (HBI) (time frame: Trajectory over one year (baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06036147, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Mar 2025.