AzTrials
AzTrials

Sleep Breathing DisordersNCT06038006

A Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness and Safety of a mmWave Radar Based Sleep Respiratory Monitoring System

A study testing Sleep Respiratory Monitoring System in people with Sleep Breathing Disorders, run by Changsha Tsingray Technology Co., Ltd. at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study compares the diagnostic capability of a millimeter-wave radar-based Sleep Respiratory Monitoring System to the gold standard polysomnography. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Sleep Breathing Disorders
What is being tested?
Sleep Respiratory Monitoring System
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
150 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
13 Jul 2023to Nov 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participants is 18 years of age or older.
  • Participants is willing to undergo overnight polysomnography and Sleep Respiratory Monitoring System testing.

Who cannot join

  • Participants with severe cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, severe liver, kidney, and lung dysfunction.
  • Participants with unstable respiratory diseases, or other diseases in acute phase.
  • Long-term or current use of barbiturates, benzodiazepines, sedatives and other drugs that may affect sleep.
  • Participants that undergo CPAP treatment during the night of the trial.
  • Participants with other sleep disorders, e.g. insomnia.
  • Participants with mental disorders.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Participants that refuse to sign informed consents.
  • Participants unable to cooperate with medical examination.
  • Participants excluded in the opinion of the investigator.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital

    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200025

    Jian Guan, 18930172210 ext. +86, guanjian0606@sina.com

    Shankai Yin

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: A Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness and Safety of a Millimeter-Wave Radar Based Sleep Respiratory Monitoring System

This study compares the diagnostic capability of a millimeter-wave radar-based Sleep Respiratory Monitoring System to the gold standard polysomnography.

Read the detailed description

The gold standard for the diagnosis of sleep breathing disorders is polysomnography (PSG), which requires contact sensors, in-lab monitoring and manual scoring by experts, limiting the comfortability of patients and accessibility of diagnosis. A novel contactless millimeter-wave radar-based Sleep Respiratory Monitoring System is developed, in order to assist sleep staging and the diagnosis of sleep breathing disorders.

The Sleep Respiratory Monitoring System is capable of collecting, recording, storing and analyzing breathing, heartbeat, spatial distribution of full-body movements, etc. via a millimeter-wave radar, and oxygen saturation, pulse, etc. via a pulse oximeter. A dedicated algorithm enables the system to detect respiratory events and estimate sleep stages based on the collected data. The device and algorithms are to be validated in this study by comparison with PSG.

Being tested
Sleep Respiratory Monitoring System

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Sleep Respiratory Monitoring SystemDiagnostic test

    Millimeter-Wave radar-based Sleep Respiratory Monitoring System to be used on each participant undergoing PSG

Study groups in NCT06038006
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ParticipantsExperimentalThe only arm containing participants of this study.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Sleep Respiratory Monitoring System

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Diagnostic Sensitivity (AHI≥5) of Sleep Respiratory Monitoring System (SRMS) Compared with Polysomnography (PSG)

    The proportion of participants with Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) ≥ 5 events per hour according to SRMS in participants with AHI ≥ 5 events per hour according to PSG scored with American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) v2.6 Guidelines. The point estimation of diagnostic sensitivity of SRMS will be compared to the threshold of 0.8, with the half width of 95% confidence interval being no more than 0.1.

    Measured: Day 1

  2. Diagnostic Sensitivity (AHI≥15) of Sleep Respiratory Monitoring System (SRMS) Compared with Polysomnography (PSG)

    The proportion of participants with Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) ≥ 15 events per hour according to SRMS in participants with AHI ≥ 15 events per hour according to PSG scored with American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) v2.6 Guidelines. The point estimation of diagnostic sensitivity of SRMS will be compared to the threshold of 0.8, with the half width of 95% confidence interval being no more than 0.1.

    Measured: Day 1

  3. Diagnostic Sensitivity (AHI≥30) of Sleep Respiratory Monitoring System (SRMS) Compared with Polysomnography (PSG)

    The proportion of participants with Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) ≥ 30 events per hour according to SRMS in participants with AHI ≥ 30 events per hour according to PSG scored with American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) v2.6 Guidelines. The point estimation of diagnostic sensitivity of SRMS will be compared to the threshold of 0.8, with the half width of 95% confidence interval being no more than 0.1.

    Measured: Day 1

  4. Diagnostic Specificity (AHI≥5) of Sleep Respiratory Monitoring System (SRMS) Compared with Polysomnography (PSG)

    The proportion of participants with Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) < 5 events per hour according to SRMS in participants with AHI < 5 events per hour according to PSG scored with American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) v2.6 Guidelines. The point estimation of diagnostic specificity of SRMS will be compared to the threshold of 0.8, with the half width of 95% confidence interval being no more than 0.1.

    Measured: Day 1

  5. Diagnostic Specificity (AHI≥15) of Sleep Respiratory Monitoring System (SRMS) Compared with Polysomnography (PSG)

    The proportion of participants with Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) < 15 events per hour according to SRMS in participants with AHI < 15 events per hour according to PSG scored with American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) v2.6 Guidelines. The point estimation of diagnostic specificity of SRMS will be compared to the threshold of 0.8, with the half width of 95% confidence interval being no more than 0.1.

    Measured: Day 1

  6. Diagnostic Specificity (AHI≥30) of Sleep Respiratory Monitoring System (SRMS) Compared with Polysomnography (PSG)

    The proportion of participants with Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) < 30 events per hour according to SRMS in participants with AHI < 30 events per hour according to PSG scored with American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) v2.6 Guidelines. The point estimation of diagnostic specificity of SRMS will be compared to the threshold of 0.8, with the half width of 95% confidence interval being no more than 0.1.

    Measured: Day 1

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Intra-Class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI)

    ICC between AHI according to Sleep Respiratory Monitoring System (SRMS) and AHI according to Polysomnography (PSG), using one-way random effects model.

    Measured: Day 1

  2. Intra-Class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of Total Sleep Time (TST)

    ICC between TST according to Sleep Respiratory Monitoring System (SRMS) and TST according to Polysomnography (PSG), using one-way random effects model.

    Measured: Day 1

  3. Intra-Class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of Deep Sleep Proportion

    ICC between the proportion of deep sleep time in total sleep time (TST) according to Sleep Respiratory Monitoring System (SRMS) and the proportion of stage N3 sleep time in TST according to Polysomnography (PSG), using one-way random effects model.

    Measured: Day 1

  4. Intra-Class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of Light Sleep Proportion

    ICC between the proportion of light sleep time in total sleep time (TST) according to Sleep Respiratory Monitoring System (SRMS) and the proportion of stage N1 sleep time plus stage N2 sleep time in TST according to Polysomnography (PSG), using one-way random effects model.

    Measured: Day 1

  5. Intra-Class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of Rapid Eye Movement (REM) Sleep Proportion

    ICC between the proportion of REM sleep time in total sleep time (TST) according to Sleep Respiratory Monitoring System (SRMS) and the proportion of stage R sleep time in TST according to Polysomnography (PSG), using one-way random effects model.

    Measured: Day 1

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Sep 2023
  2. Study start13 Jul 2023
  3. Primary completionNov 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completionNov 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
150 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06038006
Sponsor's protocol ID
20221128
Status last verified
Sep 2023
First submitted
8 Sep 2023
Last updated
14 Sep 2023
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Li CY, Wang W, Huang WJ, Xu HH, Yi HL, Guan J, Li G, Yin SK. [Diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea by a new radar device: a parallel controlled study evaluating agreement with polysomnographic monitoring]. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Aug 7;59(8):857-863. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20231204-00267. Chinese.

    PubMed 39193596

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Sleep Respiratory Monitoring System in people with Sleep Breathing Disorders, run by Changsha Tsingray Technology Co., Ltd. at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Jian Guan (18930172210 ext. +86, guanjian0606@sina.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Diagnostic Sensitivity (AHI≥5) of Sleep Respiratory Monitoring System (SRMS) Compared with Polysomnography (PSG) (time frame: Day 1). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06038006, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Sep 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in