AzTrials
AzTrials

Gastroesophageal HerniaHillKINGNCT06040723

Hill-grade Knowledge Via Integrated Neural-network for Gastroscopy

An observational study of Gastroesophageal Hernia, run by Wuerzburg University Hospital at 1 site in Germany.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The Hill classification, also known as the Hill grade, is a system used to classify the severity of gastroesophageal valve incompetence, specifically related to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and hiatal hernia. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Gastroesophageal Hernia
What is being tested?
EndoMind
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
195 participants
Where
1 siteGermany
Study dates
10 Oct 2023to 22 Dec 2023
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: All adult patients that have not undergone and are not undergoing a surgery for reconstruction of the flap-valve.

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patients (>18 years)
  • Scheduled gastroscopy

Who cannot join

  • Examination level
  • Previous surgical interventions or altered anatomy that prevents the proper examination of the flap valve
  • Flap-valve not inspected
  • Data Level:
  • Image during flap-valve inspection not stored
  • Expert committee not resulting in a majority vote

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Germany1 site
  • Universitätsklinikum Würzburg

    Würzburg, Bavaria, 97080

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: Real Time Determination of the Hill Grade During Gastroscopy Using Artificial Intelligence

The Hill classification, also known as the Hill grade, is a system used to classify the severity of gastroesophageal valve incompetence, specifically related to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and hiatal hernia. This study aims to compare the ability of physicians versus an AI model to asses the Hill grade during gastroscopy.

Read the detailed description

Objective:

The primary goal of this study is to compare the accuracy in determining the Hill classification during gastroscopy between an artificial intelligence (AI) based system and physicians performing the examination. Secondary outcomes include evaluation of the per-class accuracy and other statistical measures such as precision, recall and f1 score.

Study Design:

Single center, endoscopist blinded study. The model considered in a previous study achieved a mean accuracy of 88%. All participants initially attended a lecture serving as a refresher regarding the Hill classification. Subsequently, physicians were asked to provide the Hill classification for test images expert annotated images depicting different Hill grades, achieving mean accuracy of 72%. Thus 127 paired measurements are required. Taking patient drop-out into consideration, at least 159 patients need to be recruited. Upon examination of the flap-valve during endoscopy, the physician is required to store an image of the flap-valve during retroflexion, which is part of the standard procedure, based on which they determine the Hill classification. The prediction of the AI model on this image is considered the model output and is considered the model's output. A group of three expert endoscopists determines the Hill classification for each image, based on majority vote, which is treated as the gold standard.

AI setup and limitations:

There are no limitations caused by the AI. The method performs a frame-by-frame analysis of the recording. These images are parsed from the AI based system in order to obtain predictions. The only interactions required with the method is a button press that initiates the examination recording process and a second button press to terminate the recording. This is performed at the beginning and end of the examination respectively. The model used in this study is an updated version of the model reported in a preliminary study, that has been trained with more data together with an auxiliary output for predicting if the Hill classification is relevant to the shown image.

Study population:

All adult patients appointed for gastroscopy that do not match the exclusion criteria will be asked for informed consent. Exclusion criteria include previous surgical interventions or altered anatomy that prevents the proper examination of the flap valve, examinations where the flap-valve is not inspected, and examinations where the expert committee does not produce a majority vote.

Intervention:

The physician performs the examination as usual. Upon inspection of the flap valve, the physician captures an image of the examination, as usual, and gives their assessment of the Hill grade. The output of the model for the same image is considered the model prediction. The physician is blinded to the model's prediction.

Being tested
EndoMind
Keywords
Hill grade, Gastroscopy, Gastroesophageal Flap Valve, Artificial Intelligence
Medical subject headings
Hernia, Hiatal

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EndoMindDevice

    The EndoMind system is equipped with an AI model for predicting the Hill grade during gastroscopy.

Study groups in NCT06040723
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Experimental: Intervention armAll patients within the study are included in the intervention arm: The Hill classification is determined by the physician and the AI method.
Receives: Device: EndoMind

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Accuracy of assessments for the Hill classification for physicians and AI method.

    Binary assessment of physician vs AI correct and erroneous predictions.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 5 months

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Accuracy of assessments for each Hill grade for physicians and AI method.

    Description: The correct and erroneous predictions for each specific Hill class.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 5 months

  2. Precision and recall of the assessments for each Hill from endoscopists and AI method.

    The precision, and recall statistics for each class (1v0) over the four different Hill classes.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 5 months

  3. Distance for label assessment from gold standard label.

    Comparison of the distance between the gold standard label and the label assigned by the physician and AI method.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 5 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Sep 2023
  2. Study start10 Oct 2023
  3. Primary completion22 Dec 2023
  4. Study completion22 Dec 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
195 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06040723
Sponsor's protocol ID
AI04
Acronym
HillKING
Status last verified
May 2024
First submitted
8 Sep 2023
Last updated
9 May 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Kafetzis I, Sodmann P, Herghelegiu BE, Brand M, Zoller WG, Seyfried F, Fuchs KH, Meining A, Hann A. Prospective Evaluation of Real-Time Artificial Intelligence for the Hill Classification of the Gastroesophageal Junction. United European Gastroenterol J. 2025 Mar;13(2):240-246. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12721. Epub 2024 Dec 12.

    PubMed 39668544

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Gastroesophageal Hernia, run by Wuerzburg University Hospital at 1 site in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Accuracy of assessments for the Hill classification for physicians and AI method. (time frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06040723, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 May 2024.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in