AzTrials
AzTrials

Metastatic CancerNCT06042400

Trial of Written Exposure for Metastatic Cancer Patients (EASE)

A study testing Written Exposure Therapy in people with Metastatic Cancer and Solid Tumor Cancer, run by University of Colorado, Boulder at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In the face of imminent loss, many adults with metastatic cancer report a range of mental health challenges, including cancer-related trauma symptoms, fear of cancer progression and dying/death, anxiety, depression, and hopelessness, as well as physical symptoms such as fatigue and pain. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Written Exposure Therapy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
18 Apr 2022to 21 Sep 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • At least 18 years of age
  • English-speaking (able to speak, read, and write well in English)
  • Diagnosed with solid tumor cancer at Stage III (locally metastatic) or Stage IV (distantly metastatic) or solid tumor cancer that has recurred, or actively treated lymphoproliferative cancer (e.g., non-solid tumor cancer)
  • Report elevated cancer-related trauma symptoms or fear of cancer progression on the screening measures: IES-R, FoP-Q 12-item short version.
  • No moderate to severe dementia reported by patient or seen during eligibility confirmation in the medical chart
  • Are capable at time of consent of understanding and voluntarily consenting themselves to the study, attending EASE sessions, and completing the online sessions at home, confirmed by an Eastern Cooperative Group Performance Status Scale of 0 to 2. Given that the study does not require individuals to leave their home, we will make an exception for individuals endorsing an Eastern Cooperative Group Performance Status Scale score of 3 (confined to bed or chair for <50% of waking hours, able to do only limited selfcare) if they meet all other study criteria, including criteria 7.
  • Report that they are able and willing to complete all study procedures, including the online assessments and the intervention itself, including being physically able to write by hand or type for 30 minutes at a time and do weekly hour-long EASE sessions by Zoom.
  • Has access to a computer with internet connection or are willing to use a study-loaned computer tablet for the study duration, and are willing to conduct sessions via videoconferencing on a computer

Who cannot join

  • 1. Current moderate or high suicide risk evaluated by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (CSSRS)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Colorado Boulder

    Boulder, Colorado, 80309

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Pilot Trial of Written Exposure Intervention for Metastatic Cancer Patients: The EASE Study

In the face of imminent loss, many adults with metastatic cancer report a range of mental health challenges, including cancer-related trauma symptoms, fear of cancer progression and dying/death, anxiety, depression, and hopelessness, as well as physical symptoms such as fatigue and pain. Cancer patients may report feeling upset or haunted by imagined scenarios in a way that causes them distress and lowers their quality of life.

This study aims to look at the acceptability and feasability of a writing-based intervention for adults with late-stage or recurrent cancer, or actively treated blood cancer. The EASE study uses a writing-based approach to address an individual's worst-case scenario about cancer because previous studies have shown that similar approaches have shown promise in reducing fear in early-stage cancer survivors and among adults with PTSD (posttraumatic stress disorder). The EASE study represents a novel adaptation of this foundational work on written exposure therapy (WET) to address worst-case scenarios among adults with late stage cancers.

The EASE study will include 5 weekly one-on-one online video sessions with a trained therapist where participants will be coached through writing exercises based on a worst-case scenario related to their cancer experience.

Read the detailed description

This single-arm pilot trial aims to look at the acceptability and feasibility of a writing-based intervention for adults with metastatic or recurrent cancer, or actively treated blood cancer.

The EASE intervention represents a novel adaptation of foundational work on written exposure therapy (WET) to address worst-case scenarios among adults with metastatic cancer, including cancer diagnosed at Stage III or IV, cancer that has recurred, or actively treated lymphoproliferative cancer. The study will consist of 5 weekly one-on-one online sessions with a trained graduate student therapist who will explain the approach and coach participants through writing exercises based on a worst-case scenario related to their fears about cancer.

Remote Delivery.

The intervention will be delivered remotely via videoconferencing software or videoconferencing plus phone. Phone sessions will be available as a backup if a participant has significant technical difficulties with Zoom. All sessions will be recorded.

Being tested
Written Exposure Therapy
Medical subject headings
Neoplasm Metastasis, Lymphoproliferative Disorders, Anxiety Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Written Exposure TherapyBehavioural

    An innovative written exposure therapy intervention that addresses psychosocial needs commonly experienced by patients with late stage cancers.

Study groups in NCT06042400
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
EASE Written Exposure InterventionExperimentalAssigned Intervention
Receives: Behavioral: Written Exposure Therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Cancer-related trauma symptoms

    A primary outcome will be change in cancer-related trauma symptoms, assessed by the 22-item Impact of Events Scale-Revised. Possible scores range 0-88 with higher scores indicating greater distress/bother.

    Measured: Assessed seven times: prior to the intervention (Pre), before each intervention session, 3 weeks after the intervention begins (Mid), 6 weeks after baseline (Post), at 1.5 and 3-month follow-up (FU)

  2. Fear of cancer progression

    A primary outcome will be change in fear of cancer progression, assessed by the 12-item Fear of Progression Questionnaire - Short Form and by the four general scale items from the Concerns about Recurrence Scale, with wording adapted to focus on cancer progression rather than recurrence. Range: 12-60, higher scores are associated with higher fear of cancer progression.

    Measured: Assessed: prior to the intervention (Pre), before each intervention session, 3 weeks after the intervention begins (Mid), 6 weeks after baseline (Post), at 1.5 and 3-month follow-up (FU)

  3. Intervention acceptability

    Assessed with the Acceptability of Intervention Scale. Possible scores range from 4-20, with higher scores indicating greater intervention acceptability.

    Measured: Assessed in order to compare values at 2 timepoints: 6 weeks after baseline (Post) and separately at 1.5-month follow-up (FU)

  4. Intervention Feasibility

    For participants who begin the intervention, at least 70% complete all intervention sessions

    Measured: Assessed at each intervention session 1-5, 1 to 5 weeks after baseline.

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8)

    Patient-reported depression symptom questionnaire. Range is 0 to 24. Higher scores indicate more depression symptoms

    Measured: Assessed: prior to the intervention (Pre), 3 weeks after the intervention begins (Mid), 6 weeks after baseline (Post),, at 1.5 and 3-month follow-up (FU)

  2. Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Questionnaire

    Patient-reported anxiety symptom questionnaire. Possible scores range from 0-21, with higher scores indicating more anxiety symptoms

    Measured: Assessed: prior to the intervention (Pre), 3 weeks after the intervention begins (Mid), 6 weeks after baseline (Post), at 1.5 and 3-month follow-up (FU)

  3. The Death Attitude Profile-Revised, Fear of Death and Death Avoidance Scales

    Patient-reported fear of death and dying questionnaire. Possible scores range from 12-84, with higher scores indicating greater fear of death and dying

    Measured: Assessed: prior to the intervention (Pre), 3 weeks after the intervention begins (Mid), 6 weeks after baseline (Post), at 1.5 and 3-month follow-up (FU)

  4. Hopelessness Assessment in Illness Questionnaire 8-item

    Patient-reported hopelessness specifically intended for use with adults with incurable cancer. Possible scores range 0-16, with higher scores indicating greater hopelessness.

    Measured: Assessed: prior to the intervention (Pre), 3 weeks after the intervention begins (Mid), 6 weeks after baseline (Post), at 1.5 and 3-month follow-up (FU)

  5. The Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue-Short Form v1.0

    Patient-reported levels of fatigue. Possible scores range 6-30, with higher scores indicating greater fatigue.

    Measured: Assessed: prior to the intervention (Pre), 3 weeks after the intervention begins (Mid), 6 weeks after baseline (Post), at 1.5 and 3-month follow-up (FU)

  6. The Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference-Short Form v1.0

    Patient-reported dimension of pain interference (e.g., the extent to which pain interferes with daily life and life roles). Possible scores range 6-30, with higher scores indicating greater pain.

    Measured: Assessed: prior to the intervention (Pre), 3 weeks after the intervention begins (Mid), 6 weeks after baseline (Post), at 1.5 and 3-month follow-up (FU)

  7. Emotional Approach Coping Scale (COPE): Avoidance coping (process measure)

    Patient-reported coping through avoidance using three avoidance coping scales (mental disengagement, denial, physical disengagement) with cancer as the anchor. Possible scores range 8-28, with higher scores indicating greater denial, mental and behavioral disengagement.

    Measured: Assessed: prior to the intervention (Pre), 3 weeks after the intervention begins (Mid), 6 weeks after baseline (Post), at 1.5 and 3-month follow-up (FU)

  8. Five Factor Mindfulness Questionnaire, Nonjudge and nonreact scales (process measure)

    Patient-reported coping through acceptance. Possible scores range 15-75, with higher scores reflecting greater nonreactivity and nonjudging of inner experience.

    Measured: Assessed: prior to the intervention (Pre), 3 weeks after the intervention begins (Mid), 6 weeks after baseline (Post), at 1.5 and 3-month follow-up (FU)

  9. Valuing Questionnaire

    Valued engagement in daily life. Possible scores range 0-30 for each of the two subscales with higher scores indicating greater engagement and sense of purpose in life.

    Measured: Assessed: prior to the intervention (Pre), 3 weeks after the intervention begins (Mid), 6 weeks after baseline (Post), at 1.5 and 3-month follow-up (FU)

  10. Self-compassion Scale-Short Form

    Self-compassion questionnaire. Possible scores range 12-60 with higher scores indicating higher self-compassion.

    Measured: Assessed: prior to the intervention (Pre), 3 weeks after the intervention begins (Mid), 6 weeks after baseline (Post), at 1.5 and 3-month follow-up (FU)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Sep 2023
  2. Study start18 Apr 2022
  3. Primary completion21 Sep 2023
  4. Study completion21 Sep 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
Single-arm pilot trial: all participants will receive intervention
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06042400
Sponsor's protocol ID
21-0243
Status last verified
Dec 2023
First submitted
16 May 2022
Last updated
5 Dec 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Written Exposure Therapy in people with Metastatic Cancer and Solid Tumor Cancer, run by University of Colorado, Boulder at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Dec 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Cancer-related trauma symptoms (time frame: Assessed seven times: prior to the intervention (Pre), before each intervention session, 3 weeks after the intervention begins (Mid), 6 weeks after baseline (Post), at 1.5 and 3-month follow-up (FU)). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Dec 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in