AzTrials
AzTrials

Crohn's DiseasePhase 4NCT06045754

A Study of Vedolizumab Intravenous (IV) and Adalimumab or Vedolizumab and Ustekinumab in Adults With Crohn's Disease

A Phase 4 study testing Vedolizumab, Adalimumab and Ustekinumab in people with Crohn's Disease, run by Takeda at 48 sites in 2 countries.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

The main aim of this study is to learn about the effect of treatment with vedolizumab IV (vedolizumab) together with adalimumab or vedolizumab (VDZ) together with ustekinumab (UST) in adults with moderate to severe Crohn's Disease, and the effect of treatment with vedolizumab alone, after the dual targeted treatment. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Crohn's Disease
What is being tested?
Vedolizumab, Adalimumab and Ustekinumab
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
48 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
18 Apr 2024to 28 Jun 2027
Phase
Phase 4

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Part A:
  • Has a confirmed diagnosis of CD at least 3 months before screening, based on endoscopy results.
  • Has moderately to severely active CD at Screening, defined as an SES-CD >=6 (>=4 if isolated ileal disease).
  • Has demonstrated at least 1 of the following (a, b, or c) to at least 1 IL antagonist or at least 1 tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist, at doses approved for the treatment of CD:
  • Inadequate response after completing the full induction regimen;
  • Loss of response (recurrence of symptoms during scheduled maintenance dosing after prior clinical benefit); or
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Intolerance (a significant adverse event that precluded further use, including but not limited to serious infection including opportunistic infections, malignancy, infusion-related and hypersensitivity reactions including anaphylaxis, and liver injury).
  • Note: Participants with an inadequate response to >2 classes of advanced therapies or >1 agent in the same class are not eligible. Participants who discontinued a third class of advanced therapy for reasons other than inadequate response may be eligible after discussion with the Medical Monitor.
  • Part B:
  • In the investigator's opinion, the participant exhibits a therapeutic benefit at Week 26.

Who cannot join

  • CDAI score > 450.
  • A current diagnosis of ulcerative colitis or indeterminate colitis.
  • Clinical evidence of an abdominal abscess.
  • Known fistula (other than perianal fistula) or phlegmon.
  • Known perianal fistula with abscess.
  • Ileostomy, colostomy, or severe, or symptomatic stenosis of the intestine.
Show all 18Show fewer
  • Previous extensive bowel resection with 2 entire segments missing, of the following: terminal ileum, right colon, transverse colon, sigmoid and left colon, and rectum.
  • Short bowel syndrome.
  • Any planned surgical intervention for CD, except for seton placement for perianal fistula without abscess.
  • History or evidence of adenomatous colonic polyps that have not been removed.
  • History or evidence of colonic mucosal dysplasia.
  • Intolerance or contraindication to ileocolonoscopy.
  • Any identified congenital or acquired immunodeficiency (eg, common variable immunodeficiency infection).
  • Active or latent tuberculosis (TB), regardless of treatment history.
  • A positive test for hepatitis B virus (HBV) as defined by the presence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) or hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb) test.
  • A positive test for hepatitis C virus (HCV), as defined by a positive hepatitis C virus antibody (HCVAb) test and detectable HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA).
  • Received approved or investigational anti-integrin antibodies (i.e., vedolizumab, natalizumab, efalizumab, etrolizumab, abrilumab [AMG 181], anti- mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule-1 [MAdCAM-1] antibodies, or rituximab) for the treatment of CD.
  • History of or symptoms of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) in the investigator's opinion. If a participant has symptoms consistent with PML, a PML checklist must be completed and submitted to the PML independent adjudication committee. If the PML IAC deems the participant to have PML, the participant is ineligible.

Trial locations and contacts

48 sites in 2 countries.

48 sites in 2 countries

United States41 sites
  • Texas Digestive Disease Consultants Cedar Park

    Cedar Park, Texas, 78613

  • University of Chicago Medicine

    Chicago, Illinois, 60637

  • University of Cincinnati

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45627

  • Ohio Gastroenterology group, Inc.

    Columbus, Ohio, 43202

  • GI Alliance - Digestive Health Associates of Texas

    Dallas, Texas, 75044

  • Digestive Health Specialsits

    Dothan, Alabama, 36301

  • Medical Research Center of Connecticut, LLC

    Hamden, Connecticut, 06518

  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • University of Kansas Medical Center

    Kansas City, Kansas, 66160

  • Mid-America Gastro-Intestinal Consultants

    Kansas City, Missouri, 64111

  • Clinical Research of Osceola

    Kissimmee, Florida, 34741

  • University of California San Diego Health (UCSD)

    La Jolla, California, 92037

  • BVL Clinical Research

    Liberty, Missouri, 64068

  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

    Los Angeles, California, 90048

  • University of Louisville

    Louisville, Kentucky, 40202

  • Texas Digestive Disease Consultants Lubbock

    Lubbock, Texas, 79410

  • GI Alliance - Mansfield

    Mansfield, Texas, 76063

  • Great Lakes Gastroenterology Research, LLC

    Mentor, Ohio, 44060

  • GI Alliance

    Metairie, Louisiana, 70006

  • Tulane University

    New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112

  • NYU Langone Health

    New York, New York, 10016

  • Hoag Hospital Newport Beach

    Newport Beach, California, 92663

  • Digestive Disease Specialists, Inc.

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73114

  • Endoscopic Research Inc

    Orlando, Florida, 32803

  • University Gastroenterology

    Providence, Rhode Island, 02094

  • Sanford Health Research

    Rapid City, South Dakota, 57701

  • Gastroenterology Consultants, P.C.

    Roswell, Georgia, 30076

  • University of Utah Health

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84108

  • Gastroenterology Research of San Antonio, LLC

    San Antonio, Texas, 78229

  • Southern Star Research Institute, LLC.

    San Antonio, Texas, 78229

  • Texas Digestive Disease Consultants (TDDC), Southlake

    Southlake, Texas, 76092

  • Washington University School of Medicine

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

  • GI Alliance Sun City

    Sun City, Arizona, 85351

  • Washington Gastroenterology- GIA

    Tacoma, Washington, 98405

  • Alliance Clinical Research of Tampa, LLC

    Tampa, Florida, 33615

  • Cotton ONeil Clinical Research Center

    Topeka, Kansas, 66606

  • Tyler Research Institute, LLC

    Tyler, Texas, 75701

  • GI Alliance - Webster

    Webster, Texas, 77598

  • Gastro Intestinal Research Institute of Northern Ohio, LLC.

    Westlake, Ohio, 44145

  • Allegheny Health Network

    Wexford, Pennsylvania, 15090

  • Huron Gastroenterology Associates, P.C.

    Ypsilanti, Michigan, 48197

Other trials in United States

Canada7 sites
  • Covenant Health

    Edmonton, Alberta, T5K 2K4

  • London Health Sciences Centre

    London, Ontario, N6A 5A5

  • The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre

    Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1A4

  • Viable Clinical Research - North Bay

    North Bay, Ontario, P1B 2H3

  • Toronto Immune and Digestive Health Institute Inc. (TIDHI)

    North York, Ontario, M6A3B4

  • ABP Research Services Corp.

    Oakville, Ontario, L6L 5L7

  • Toronto Digestive Disease Associates (TDDA) Inc.

    Vaughan, Ontario, L4L 4Y7

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: An Open-Label, Phase 4 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Dual Targeted Therapy With Vedolizumab Intravenous (IV) and Adalimumab Subcutaneous (SC) or Vedolizumab IV and Ustekinumab IV/SC in Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease (CD)

The main aim of this study is to learn about the effect of treatment with vedolizumab IV (vedolizumab) together with adalimumab or vedolizumab (VDZ) together with ustekinumab (UST) in adults with moderate to severe Crohn's Disease, and the effect of treatment with vedolizumab alone, after the dual targeted treatment.

The study is conducted in two parts. In Part A, participants will receive the dual targeted treatment (vedolizumab together with either adalimumab or ustekinumab). In part B, participants will receive vedolizumab only. Part B will include participants who responded to the treatment in Part A.

Each participant will be followed up for at least 26 weeks after the last dose of treatment.

Read the detailed description

The drug being tested in this study is vedolizumab. Vedolizumab is being tested to treat people with moderate to severe Crohn's disease who have experienced inadequate response, loss of response or intolerance to either one prior interleukin [IL] antagonist, and no other biologic/small molecule (Group A); one IL antagonist and either one Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) or one TNFi (other than adalimumab) [Group B] (Cohort 1) or one prior tumor necrosis factor inhibitor [TNFi] and no other biologic/small molecule (Group C); one TNFi and either 1 JAKi or one IL antagonist (other than UST) (Group D) (Cohort 2). The study will look at the efficacy and safety of dual targeted therapy.

The study will enroll approximately 100 participants. Participants will be assigned to one of the two treatment groups in Part A:

  • Part A, Cohort 1: Vedolizumab + Adalimumab
  • Part A, Cohort 2: Vedolizumab + Ustekinumab

All participants who achieve therapeutic benefit in Part A will receive vedolizumab IV 300 mg monotherapy from Week 30 until Week 46 in Part B. Participants will be followed for a further 20-week safety follow-up period to Week 72 (or 26 weeks post-last dose of study drug).

This multi-center trial will be conducted in the United States and Canada. The overall time to participate in this study is approximately 76 weeks.

Conditions
Crohn's Disease
Being tested
Vedolizumab, Adalimumab, Ustekinumab
Keywords
Drug Therapy
Medical subject headings
Crohn Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • VedolizumabDrug

    Also called Entyvio

    Vedolizumab intravenous infusion.

  • AdalimumabDrug

    Also called Humira

    Adalimumab subcutaneous injection.

  • UstekinumabDrug

    Also called Stelara

    Ustekinumab intravenous infusion.

  • UstekinumabDrug

    Also called Stelara

    Ustekinumab subcutaneous injection.

Study groups in NCT06045754
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Part A, Cohort 1: Vedolizumab + AdalimumabExperimentalParticipants will receive vedolizumab IV 300 mg, at Weeks 0, 2, and 6, then every 8 weeks (Q8W) until Week 22 and adalimumab SC 160, 80, and 40 mg at Weeks 0, 2, and 4, respectively, then 40 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) until Week 26.
Receives: Drug: Vedolizumab; Drug: Adalimumab
Part A, Cohort 2: Vedolizumab + UstekinumabExperimentalParticipants will receive vedolizumab IV 300 mg, at Weeks 0, 2, and 6, then Q8W until Week 22 and ustekinumab IV 520, 390, or 260 mg (weight-based), then SC 90 mg 8 weeks after initial IV dose, then Q8W until Week 24.
Receives: Drug: Vedolizumab; Drug: Ustekinumab
Part B: Vedolizumab MonotherapyExperimentalParticipants who achieve therapeutic benefit in Part A will receive vedolizumab IV 300 mg monotherapy, Q8W from Week 30 until Week 46 and will be followed up to Week 52.
Receives: Drug: Vedolizumab

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Part A: Percentage of Participants With an Endoscopic Response Based on the Simple Endoscopic Score for (SES-CD) at Week 26

    Endoscopic response is defined by a >=50 percent (%) reduction from baseline in the SES-CD. SES-CD evaluates 4 endoscopic variables (ulcer size, percentage of surface area (SA) that is ulcerated, percentage of SA affected, and presence and type of narrowings in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy. Each variable is coded from 0 to 3 based on severity, where 0 is none or not severe and 3 is most severe case, with sum of scores for each variable ranging from 0 to 15, except for presence of narrowing. Presence of narrowing ranges from 0 to 11 since a severity of 3 represents a narrowing which a colonoscope cannot be passed and, thus, can only be observed once among the bowel segments. The overall SES-CD score ranges from 0 to 56 and is the sum of 4 variables across 5 bowel segments. Higher scores indicate more severe disease.

    Measured: At Week 26

  2. Part B: Percentage of Participants With an Endoscopic Response Based on the SES-CD at Week 52

    Endoscopic response is defined by a >=50 reduction from baseline in the SES-CD. SES-CD evaluates 4 endoscopic variables (ulcer size, percentage of surface area (SA) that is ulcerated, percentage of SA affected, and presence and type of narrowings in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy. Each variable is coded from 0 to 3 based on severity, where 0 is none or not severe and 3 is most severe case, with sum of scores for each variable ranging from 0 to 15, except for presence of narrowing. Presence of narrowing ranges from 0 to 11 since a severity of 3 represents a narrowing which a colonoscope cannot be passed and, thus, can only be observed once among the bowel segments. The overall SES-CD score ranges from 0 to 56 and is the sum of 4 variables across 5 bowel segments. Higher scores indicate more severe disease.

    Measured: At Week 52

Secondary outcomes (16)
  1. Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Based on the Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) (CDAI <150) at Week 12, Week 26, and Week 52

    Clinical remission is defined as a CDAI score of <150 points. CDAI assesses CD based on clinical signs such as number of liquid or very soft stools, abdominal pain, general wellbeing, extra-intestinal manifestations of CD, antidiarrheal use, presence of abdominal mass, hematocrit and body weight. CDAI consists of eight factors, each summed after adjustment with a weighting factor. Total score ranges from 0 to 600 points. Higher scores indicate more severity. Percentage of participants in clinical remission based on CDAI at either Week 12, Week 26, or Week 52 will be reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: At Weeks 12, 26, and 52

  2. Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission at Both Week 26 and Week 52

    Clinical remission is defined as a CDAI score of ≤150 points. CDAI assesses CD based on clinical signs such as number of liquid or very soft stools, abdominal pain, general wellbeing, extra-intestinal manifestations of CD, antidiarrheal use, presence of abdominal mass, hematocrit and body weight. CDAI consists of eight factors, each summed after adjustment with a weighting factor. Total score ranges from 0 to 600 points. Higher scores indicate more severity. Percentage of participants in clinical remission at both Week 26 and Week 52 will be reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: At Weeks 26 and 52

  3. Percentage of Participants in 2-item Patient-reported Outcome Measure (PRO2) Remission at Weeks 12, 26, and 52

    Clinical remission based on PRO2 is defined as PRO2 score <=8 from baseline. The PRO2 is comprised of the stool frequency and abdominal pain components of the CDAI. The PRO-2 score is the sum of the abdominal pain and stool frequency subscores of the CDAI score. The average daily number of liquid or very soft stools and abdominal pain score (with 0 indicating no pain and 3 indicating severe pain) are weighted according to the CDAI multiplication factors (2 for stool frequency and 5 for abdominal pain). A higher score indicates more frequent stools and more severe abdominal pain.

    Measured: At Weeks 12, 26 and 52

  4. Change in PRO2 Score from Week 26 to 52

    The PRO2 is comprised of the stool frequency and abdominal pain components of the CDAI. The PRO-2 score is the sum of the abdominal pain and stool frequency subscores of the CDAI score. The average daily number of liquid or very soft stools and abdominal pain score (with 0 indicating no pain and 3 indicating severe pain) are weighted according to the CDAI multiplication factors (2 for stool frequency and 5 for abdominal pain). A higher score indicates more frequent stools and more severe abdominal pain.

    Measured: From Week 26 up to Week 52

  5. Percentage of Participants in Stool Frequency Remission

    Stool frequency remission is defined as an average daily stool frequency of <=3 that is not worse than baseline.

    Measured: At Weeks 12, 26, and 52

  6. Percentage of Participants in Abdominal Pain Remission

    Abdominal pain remission is defined as an abdominal pain score of <=1 that is not worse than baseline.

    Measured: At Weeks 12, 26, and 52

  7. Percentage of Participants in Endoscopic Remission (SES-CD 0-2) at Week 26 and Week 52

    Endoscopic remission is defined as SES-CD score from 0-2. SES-CD evaluates 4 endoscopic variables (ulcer size, percentage of surface area (SA) that is ulcerated, percentage of SA affected, and presence and type of narrowings in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy. Each variable is coded from 0 to 3 based on severity, where 0 is none or not severe and 3 is most severe case, with sum of scores for each variable ranging from 0 to 15, except for presence of narrowing. Presence of narrowing ranges from 0 to 11 since a severity of 3 represents a narrowing which a colonoscope cannot be passed and, thus, can only be observed once among the bowel segments. The overall SES-CD score ranges from 0 to 56 and is sum of 4 variables across 5 bowel segments. Higher scores indicate more severe disease. Percentage of participants achieving endoscopic remission based on SES-CD at either Week 26 or Week 52 will be reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: At Weeks 26 and 52

  8. Percentage of Participants in Endoscopic Remission at Both Week 26 and Week 52

    Endoscopic remission as per SES-CD is defined as SES-CD score from 0-2. SES-CD evaluates 4 endoscopic variables (ulcer size, percentage of surface area (SA) that is ulcerated, percentage of SA affected, and presence and type of narrowings in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy. Each variable is coded from 0 to 3 based on severity, where 0 is none or not severe and 3 is most severe case, with sum of scores for each variable ranging from 0 to 15, except for presence of narrowing. Presence of narrowing ranges from 0 to 11 since a severity of 3 represents a narrowing which a colonoscope cannot be passed and, thus, can only be observed once among the bowel segments. The overall SES-CD score ranges from 0 to 56 and is sum of 4 variables across 5 bowel segments. Higher scores indicate more severe disease. Percentage of participants achieving endoscopic remission based on SES-CD at both Weeks 26 and 52 will be reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: At Weeks 26 and 52

  9. Percentage of Participants in Deep Remission Based on the CDAI and SES-CD at Week 26 and Week 52

    Deep remission:CDAI <150 points and SES-CD 0-2. CDAI assesses CD per clinical signs such as number of liquid/soft stools,abdominal pain,general wellbeing,extra-intestinal manifestations of CD, antidiarrheal use,presence of abdominal mass, hematocrit and body weight. It has 8 factors each summed after adjustment with weighting factor; total score:0 to 600 points, higher scores=more severity. SES-CD evaluates 4 endoscopic variables(ulcer size, percentage of ulcerated surface area, percentage of affected surface area, and presence and type of narrowings in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy. Each variable is coded from 0=none or not severe to 3=most severe case; sum of the scores range from 0 to 15, except for narrowing. Presence of narrowing ranges from 0 to 11. Overall SES-CD score ranges from 0 to 56 and is the sum of 4 variables. Higher scores=more severe disease. Participants achieving deep remission at either Week 26 or 52 will be assessed in this outcome measure.

    Measured: At Weeks 26 and 52

  10. Percentage of Participants in Deep Remission at Both Week 26 and Week 52

    Deep remission: CDAI <150 points and SES-CD 0-2. CDAI assesses CD per clinical signs such as number of liquid/soft stools,abdominal pain,general wellbeing,extra-intestinal manifestations of CD, antidiarrheal use,presence of abdominal mass, hematocrit and body weight. It has 8 factors each summed after adjustment with weighting factor; total score:0 to 600 points, higher scores=more severity. SES-CD evaluates 4 endoscopic variables(ulcer size, percentage of ulcerated surface area, percentage of affected surface area, and presence and type of narrowings in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy. Each variable is coded from 0=none or not severe to 3=most severe case; sum of the scores range from 0 to 15, except for narrowing. Presence of narrowing ranges from 0 to 11. Overall SES-CD score ranges from 0 to 56 and is the sum of 4 variables. Higher scores=more severe disease. Participants achieving deep remission at both Weeks 26 and 52 will be assessed in this outcome measure.

    Measured: At Weeks 26 and Week 52

  11. Percentage of Participants With a Clinical Response (>=100-point Decrease from Baseline in CDAI Score)

    Clinical response is defined as >=100-point decrease from Baseline in CDAI score. CDAI assesses CD based on clinical signs such as number of liquid or very soft stools, abdominal pain, general wellbeing, extra-intestinal manifestations of CD, antidiarrheal use, presence of abdominal mass, hematocrit and body weight. CDAI consist of eight factors, each summed after adjustment with a weighting factor. Total score ranges from 0 to 600 points. Higher scores indicate more severity.

    Measured: At Weeks 12, 26, and 52

  12. Percentage of Participants With Complete Endoscopic Healing

    Complete endoscopic healing is defined as SES-CD score ≤4 with a ≥2-point decrease from baseline and no individual subscore >1. SES-CD evaluates 4 endoscopic variables (ulcer size, percentage of the surface area that is ulcerated, percentage of the surface area affected, and presence and type of narrowings in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). Each variable is coded from 0 to 3 based on severity, where 0 is none or not severe and 3 is the most severe case, with the sum of the scores for each variable ranging from 0 to 15, except for presence of narrowing. Presence of narrowing ranges from 0 to 11 since a severity of 3 represents a narrowing which a colonoscope cannot be passed and, thus, can only be observed once among the bowel segments. The overall SES-CD score ranges from 0 to 56 and is the sum of 4 variables across 5 bowel segments. Higher scores indicate more severe disease.

    Measured: At Weeks 26 and 52

  13. Percentage of Participants Using Oral Corticosteroids at Baseline who are in Clinical Remission Based on CDAI Score and had Discontinued Corticosteroids

    Percentage of participants using oral corticosteroids at Baseline who are in clinical remission based on the CDAI score and had discontinued corticosteroids within >=30 days of Week 26 and within >= 90 days of Week 52. Clinical remission is defined as a CDAI score of ≤150 points. CDAI assesses CD based on clinical signs such as number of liquid or very soft stools, abdominal pain, general wellbeing, extra-intestinal manifestations of CD, antidiarrheal use, presence of abdominal mass, hematocrit and body weight. CDAI consist of eight factors, each summed after adjustment with a weighting factor. Total score ranges from 0 to 600 points. Higher scores indicate more severity.

    Measured: From Week 26 to Week 52

  14. Change in SES-CD from Baseline to Week 26 and Week 52

    SES-CD evaluates 4 endoscopic variables (ulcer size, percentage of the surface area that is ulcerated, percentage of the surface area affected, and presence and type of narrowings in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). Each variable is coded from 0 to 3 based on severity, where 0 is none or not severe and 3 is the most severe case, with the sum of the scores for each variable ranging from 0 to 15, except for presence of narrowing. Presence of narrowing ranges from 0 to 11 since a severity of 3 represents a narrowing which a colonoscope cannot be passed and, thus, can only be observed once among the bowel segments. The overall SES-CD score ranges from 0 to 56 and is the sum of 4 variables across 5 bowel segments. Higher scores indicate more severe disease.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 26 and Week 52

  15. Percentage of Participants with First CD Exacerbation After 26 Weeks

    CD exacerbation is defined as a >70-point increase in CDAI from the prior visit on 2 occasions separated by a 2-week interval, and either CRP above normal or fecal calprotectin [FCP] >250 micrograms per gram (μg/g). CDAI assesses CD based on clinical signs such as number of liquid or very soft stools, abdominal pain, general wellbeing, extra-intestinal manifestations of CD, antidiarrheal use, presence of abdominal mass, hematocrit and body weight. CDAI consist of eight factors, each summed after adjustment with a weighting factor. Total score ranges from 0 to 600 points. Higher scores indicate more severity.

    Measured: From Week 26 through Week 52

  16. Change in FCP Concentrations from Baseline to Week 12, Week 26, Week 42, and Week 52

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 26, 42, and 52

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Sep 2023
  2. Study start18 Apr 2024
  3. Primary completion28 Jun 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion28 Jun 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06045754
Sponsor's protocol ID
Vedolizumab-4051
Other IDs
MACS-2022-120102, EXPLORER 2.0
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
13 Sep 2023
Last updated
23 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Takeda provides access to the de-identified individual participant data (IPD) for eligible studies to aid qualified researchers in addressing legitimate scientific objectives (Takeda's data sharing commitment is available on https://clinicaltrials.takeda.com/takedas-commitment?commitment=5). These IPDs will be provided in a secure research environment following approval of a data sharing request, and under the terms of a data sharing agreement.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in