HCC - Hepatocellular CarcinomaPhase 2DUMELEPNCT06045975
Durvalumab/Tremelimumab in Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Setting in Patients With HCC Treated by by Percutaneous Ablation Procedure
A Phase 2 study testing Durvalumab/Tremelimumab in neoadjuvant and Durvalumab in adjuvant setting in people with HCC - Hepatocellular Carcinoma, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
This project is a Phase 2 trial testing the safety and efficacy of treatment with Durvalumab/Tremelimumab in neoadjuvant and Durvalumab in adjuvant setting in patients with BCLC A HCC treated by by percutaneous ablation (PA) procedure in a curative intent. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- HCC - Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- What is being tested?
- Durvalumab/Tremelimumab in neoadjuvant and Durvalumab in adjuvant setting
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 28 Mar 2024to 27 Sep 2028
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female patients ≥ 18 years of age.
- Histological or radiological diagnosis of HCC
- Patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent HCC (following a previous curative procedure performed at least 6 months before inclusion) eligible for PA as assessed by multidisciplinary board corresponding to BCLC A stage:
- Uninodular HCC ≥ 2 cm and ≤ 5 cm, no macroscopic vascular invasion
- Multinodular maximum 3 nodules ≤ 3 cm
- Body weight >30 kg
Show all 89Show fewer
- Liver function status Child-Pugh Class A
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) -World Health Organisation (WHO) performance status of 0 or 1
- Adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function as assessed by the following laboratory tests:
- Total bilirubin ≤ 2 mg/dL
- Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 x ULN
- Lipase ≤ 2 x ULN
- Prothrombine time-international normalized ratio (PT-INR) < 2.3 and PTT < 1.5
- Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73 m2
- Life expectancy ≥ 3 months
- Female of childbearing potential (WOCBP) or male or female patients of reproductive potential must employ effective birth control from screening to 90 days after the last dose of durvalumab monotherapy or 180 days after the last dose of durvalumab and tremelimumab combination therapy.
- Patients affiliated to a Social Security System
- Written informed consent signed (patients must be free from tutelle, curatelle or sauvegarde de justice)
- Haemoglobin ≥9.0 g/dL
- Absolute neutrophil count (ANC ≥1.0 × 109 /L)
- Platelet count ≥75 × 109/L
- Serum bilirubin ≤1.5 x institutional upper limit of normal (ULN). (This will not apply to patients with confirmed Gilbert's syndrome (persistent or recurrent hyperbilirubinemia that is predominantly unconjugated in the absence of hemolysis or hepatic pathology), who will be allowed only in consultation with their physician.)
- AST (SGOT) and ALT (SGPT) ≤5x ULN
- Measured creatinine clearance (CL) must not exceeded 40 mL/min. For the estimation of glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), the Cockcroft-Gault equation was applied in patients aged ≤65 years, while the MDRD equation was used for those older than 65 years
- Patient is willing and able to comply with the protocol for the duration of the study including undergoing treatment and scheduled visits and examinations including follow up.
- At least 1 lesion, not previously irradiated, that qualifies as a RECIST 1.1 target lesion (TL) at pre inclusion/inclusion. Tumor assessment by computed tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) must be performed within 28 days prior to inclusion
- Patients with HCV infection (as characterized by the presence of detectable HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA) or anti-HCV antibody) must be managed per local institutional practice for the study and for 6 months after the last dose of study treatment.
- Antiviral therapy in case of HBV active infection or inactive carriage
- Non inclusion criteria
- Patients with contraindications to PA procedure (Pacemakers or patients who have a history of cardiac arrhythmias or irregular heartbeats considered as contraindication to IRE, ascites, Coagulopathy, Ongoing infection)
- Patients with contraindication to contrast medium intravenous injection either gadolinium or iodinate
- Prior liver transplantation
- Prior systemic treatment for HCC, in particular agents targeting T-cell costimulation or checkpoint pathways (including those targeting PD-1, PD-L1 or PD-L2, CD137, or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen [CTLA-4]).
- Patients with large esophageal varices at risk of bleeding that are not being treated with conventional medical intervention
- Past or concurrent history of neoplasm other than HCC, except for in situ carcinoma of the cervix uteri and/or non-melanoma skin cancer and superficial bladder tumors. Any cancer curatively treated > 3 years prior to study entry is permitted
- Major surgical procedure or significant traumatic injury within 28 days before enrolment (note: local surgery for isolated lesions for palliative purposes is acceptable)
- Congestive heart failure New York Heart Association (NYHA) ≥ class 2
- Unstable angina or myocardial infarction within the past 6 months before enrolment
- Grade 3 (severe) hypertension ≥180 and/or ≥110 mmHG (systolic and diastolic, according to National Heart Foundation 2016)
- Patients with phaeochromocytoma
- Refractory ascites according to EASL guidelines definition (ascites that cannot be mobilized or the early recurrence of which cannot be prevented because of a lack of response to sodium restriction and diuretic treatment)
- Persistent proteinuria of NCI-CTCAE version 5.0 ≥ Grade 3
- Ongoing infection > Grade 2 according to NCI-CTCAE version 5.0.
- Clinically significant bleeding NCI-CTCAE version 5.0 ≥ Grade 3 within 30 days before enrolment
- Any psychological, familial, sociological, geographical or illness or medical condition that could jeopardize the safety of the patient and/or his compliance with the study protocol and follow-up procedure
- Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
- Non-healing wound, ulcer or bone fracture
- Known hypersensitivity to the study drug or excipients in the formulation
- Any malabsorption condition
- Breast feeding
- Pregnancy
- Participation in another clinical study with an investigational product during the last 6 months
- Concurrent enrolment in another clinical study, unless it is an observational (non-interventional) clinical study or during the follow-up period of an interventional study
- Any unresolved toxicity NCI CTCAE Grade ≥2 from previous anticancer therapy with the exception of alopecia, vitiligo, and the laboratory values defined in the inclusion criteria:
- Patients with Grade ≥2 neuropathy will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis after consultation with the Study Physician.
- Patients with irreversible toxicity not reasonably expected to be exacerbated by treatment with durvalumab or tremelimumab may be included only after consultation with the Study Physician.
- Any concurrent chemotherapy, IP, biologic, or hormonal therapy for cancer treatment. Concurrent use of hormonal therapy for non-cancer-related conditions (e.g., hormone replacement therapy) is acceptable. <<amend as required based on any combination studies with other anticancer agents>>
- Major surgical procedure (as defined by the Investigator) within 28 days prior to the first dose of IP. Note: Local surgery of isolated lesions for palliative intent is acceptable.
- History of allogenic organ transplantation.
- Active or prior documented autoimmune or inflammatory disorders (including inflammatory bowel disease [e.g., colitis or Crohn's disease], diverticulitis [with the exception of diverticulosis], systemic lupus erythematosus, Sarcoidosis syndrome, or Wegener syndrome [granulomatosis with polyangiitis, Graves' disease, rheumatoid arthritis, hypophysitis, uveitis, etc.]). The following are exceptions to this criterion:
- Patients with vitiligo or alopecia
- Patients with hypothyroidism (e.g., following Hashimoto syndrome) stable on hormone replacement
- Any chronic skin condition that does not require systemic therapy
- Patients without active disease in the last 5 years may be included but only after consultation with the study physician
- Patients with celiac disease controlled by diet alone
- Uncontrolled intercurrent illness, including but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, uncontrolled hypertension, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, interstitial lung disease, serious chronic gastrointestinal conditions associated with diarrhea, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirement, substantially increase risk of incurring AEs or compromise the ability of the patient to give written informed consent
- History of another primary malignancy except for:
- Malignancy treated with curative intent and with no known active disease ≥5 years before the first dose of IP and of low potential risk for recurrence
- Adequately treated non-melanoma skin cancer or lentigo maligna without evidence of disease
- Adequately treated carcinoma in situ without evidence of disease
- History of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis
- Study excludes patients with -brain metastases or spinal cord compression: Patients with suspected brain metastases at screening should have an MRI (preferred) or CT each preferably with IV contrast of the brain prior to study entry. Brain metastases will not be recorded as RECIST Target Lesions at baseline if study allows patients with brain metastases.
- Has untreated central nervous system (CNS) metastases and/or carcinomatous meningitis identified either on the baseline brain imaging (RECIST)) for details on the imaging modality) obtained during the screening period or identified prior to signing the ICF. Patients whose brain metastases have been treated may participate provided they show radiographic stability (defined as 2 brain images, both of which are obtained after treatment to the brain metastases. These imaging scans should both be obtained at least four weeks apart and show no evidence of intracranial progression). In addition, any neurologic symptoms that developed either as a result of the brain metastases or their treatment must have resolved or be stable either, without the use of steroids, or are stable on a steroid dose of ≤10mg/day of prednisone or its equivalent <<and anti-convulsants>> for at least 14 days prior to the start of treatment. Brain metastases will not be recorded as RECIST Target Lesions at baseline.
- Mean QT interval corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula (QTcF) ≥470 ms on one ECG
- History of active primary immunodeficiency
- Known to have tested positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (positive HIV 1/2 antibodies) or active tuberculosis infection (clinical evaluation that may include clinical history, physical examination and radiographic findings, or tuberculosis testing in line with local practice).
- Current or prior use of immunosuppressive medication within 14 days before the first dose of durvalumab or tremelimumab. The following are exceptions to this criterion:
- Intranasal, inhaled, topical steroids, or local steroid injections (e.g., intra articular injection)
- Systemic corticosteroids at physiologic doses not to exceed 10 mg/day of prednisone or its equivalent
- Steroids as premedication for hypersensitivity reactions (e.g., CT scan premedication)
- Receipt of live attenuated vaccine within 30 days prior to the first dose of IP. Note: Patients, if enrolled, should not receive live vaccine whilst receiving IP and up to 30 days after the last dose of IP.
- Female patients who are pregnant or breastfeeding or male or female patients of reproductive potential who are not willing to employ effective birth control from screening to 90 days after the last dose of durvalumab monotherapy or180 days after the last dose of durvalumab and tremelimumab combination therapy.
- Known allergy or hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs or any of the study drug excipients.
- Prior randomisation or treatment in a previous durvalumab and/or tremelimumab clinical study regardless of treatment arm assignment.
- Patients who have received prior anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1 or anti-CTLA-4:
- Must not have experienced a toxicity that led to permanent discontinuation of prior immunotherapy.
- All AEs while receiving prior immunotherapy must have completely resolved or resolved to baseline prior to screening for this study.
- Must not have experienced a ≥Grade 3 immune related AE or an immune related neurologic or ocular AE of any grade while receiving prior immunotherapy. NOTE: Patients with endocrine AE of ≤Grade 2 are permitted to enroll if they are stably maintained on appropriate replacement therapy and are asymptomatic.
- Must not have required the use of additional immunosuppression other than corticosteroids for the management of an AE, not have experienced recurrence of an AE if re-challenged, and not currently require maintenance doses of > 10 mg prednisone or equivalent per day.
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Durvalumab/Tremelimumab in Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Setting in Patients With HCC Treated by by Percutaneous Ablation Procedure in Curative Intent: French Multicenter Phase 2 Therapeutic
This project is a Phase 2 trial testing the safety and efficacy of treatment with Durvalumab/Tremelimumab in neoadjuvant and Durvalumab in adjuvant setting in patients with BCLC A HCC treated by by percutaneous ablation (PA) procedure in a curative intent.
DUMELEP is a Multicentre, Phase 2 trial
Eligible patients will receive consecutively:
- 1 Durvalumab 1500 mg/Tremelimumab 300 mg infusion in a neoadjuvant setting
- percutaneous ablation procedure in a curative attempt at Day 30
- 11 monthly Durvalumab 1500 mg infusions.
- Classical follow-up during an additional year (every 3 months)
Read the detailed description
Immunotherapy is currently the gold standard for first-line treatment of advanced HCC based of the combination of check-point inhibitors (CPI). The first approved regimen is based on the association of atezolizumab and bevacizumab, an antiangiogenic molecule. More recently, the HIMALAYA trial demonstrated the superiority of durvalumab-tremelimumab over sorafenib, establishing a new first-line option.The combination of Immunotherapy and locoregional treatments in earlier HCC stages may reduce relapse rates. Preliminary data from the IMBRAVE 050 trail reports lower rates of recurrence following HCC percutaneous ablation (PA) or resection associated with atezolizumab and bevacizumab in adjuvant setting.PA procedures and most likely electroporation induce T-cell recruitment that may foster immunomodulation. In particular, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) can lead to stimulation of NK cells with a more differentiated and proactivatory phenotypic profile with general increase of functional activities. As compared with RFA, these local changes of IRE induce more robust systemic effects, including both tumorigenic and immunogenic events. Indeed, the preservation of the tumor microvasculature and extracellular matrix within the coagulated zone would favour infiltration by anti tumoral immune cells. These observations are relevant for development of neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapeutic strategies in the setting of HCC treated by percutaneous ablation, and particularly IRE .
Neoadjuvant and adjuvant trials using these new molecules must now be cautiously designed based on the rigorous selection of special populations and therapeutic indications based on the following criteria:
- Exclusion of early forms of HCC with low probability of recurrence for statistical power issues
- Inclusion of patients with HCC treated in "curative intent" by new PA techniques such as electroporation
- Selective inclusion of patients treated with PA whose immunomodulatory properties are recognized
- Conditions
- HCC - Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- Being tested
- Durvalumab/Tremelimumab in neoadjuvant and Durvalumab in adjuvant setting
- Keywords
- HCC, Electroporation, immunotherapy, radiofrequency ablation, microwave
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Durvalumab/Tremelimumab in neoadjuvant and Durvalumab in adjuvant settingDrug
- Durvalumab 1500 mg/Tremelimumab 300 mg infusion in a neoadjuvant setting followed by PA procedure at Day 30+/-7 days
- 11 monthly Durvalumab 1500 mg infusions.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Durvalumab/Tremelimumab | Experimental | Durvalumab/Tremelimumab in neoadjuvant and Durvalumab in adjuvant setting Receives: Drug: Durvalumab/Tremelimumab in neoadjuvant and Durvalumab in adjuvant setting |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
local recurrence-free survival
Local recurrence is defined as the emergence of irregular areas enhanced at arterial phase followed by wash out at portal phase observed next to the ablation zone
Measured: 12 months after PA procedure
Secondary outcomes (9)
Changes of tumorous and non-tumorous perfusion parameters
rates of nodule(s) comprising necrosis and/or hypoperfusion radiological aspect compared before and after neoadjuvant course): analyzed as qualitative variables
Measured: one month of neoadjuvant treatment
Changes of size of nodules following neoadjuvant course
Nodule rates of early response after a single procedure of PA procedure (defined as absence of active tumor evaluated at one month following PA procedure)
Measured: one month of neoadjuvant treatment
Incidences of intra segmental/ extra segmental distant recurrence
will be assessed using imaging techniques as recommended by international guidelines (3-months US and MRI)
Measured: Throughout the study, an average of 30 months
Overall survival
defined as patients who are alive with or without HCC recurrence 1 year after PA procedure. Causes of death will be specified when applicable during this timeframe.
Measured: 12 months after PA procedure
Overall survival
defined as patients who are alive with or without HCC recurrence 1 year after PA procedure. Date of death will be specified when applicable during this timeframe.
Measured: 12 months after PA procedure
Treatment-related adverse events
will be monitored according to manufacturer guidelines and recommendation.
Measured: Throughout the study, an average of 30 months
Timeframe of PA performance
defined as number of days of delay in case of safety issues encountered
Measured: one month of neoadjuvant treatment
Compliance to neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments
Respect of scheduled Durvalumab/Tremelimumab infusions, Number of Durvalumab/Tremelimumab infusions administered
Measured: during one cycle neoadjuvant treatment and 11 months starting after the PA evaluation
Safety of Durvalumab/Tremelimumab infusions
Incidence of Adverse Events using current CTCAE
Measured: Throughout the study, an average of 30 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Sep 2023
- Study start28 Mar 2024
- Primary completion27 Sep 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion27 Sep 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (21)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HCC - Hepatocellular CarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- AstraZeneca
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Perre NAHON, MD-PhD, Principal investigator, APHP
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06045975
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- APHP220729
- Acronym
- DUMELEP
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 4 Sep 2023
- Last updated
- 24 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Trinchet JC, Bourcier V, Chaffaut C, Ait Ahmed M, Allam S, Marcellin P, Guyader D, Pol S, Larrey D, De Ledinghen V, Ouzan D, Zoulim F, Roulot D, Tran A, Bronowicki JP, Zarski JP, Goria O, Cales P, Peron JM, Alric L, Bourliere M, Mathurin P, Blanc JF, Abergel A, Serfaty L, Mallat A, Grange JD, Buffet C, Bacq Y, Wartelle C, Dao T, Benhamou Y, Pilette C, Silvain C, Christidis C, Capron D, Thiefin G, Hillaire S, Di Martino V, Nahon P, Chevret S; ANRS CO12 CirVir Group. Complications and competing risks of death in compensated viral cirrhosis (ANRS CO12 CirVir prospective cohort). Hepatology. 2015 Sep;62(3):737-50. doi: 10.1002/hep.27743. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
PubMed 25678021N'Kontchou G, Mahamoudi A, Aout M, Ganne-Carrie N, Grando V, Coderc E, Vicaut E, Trinchet JC, Sellier N, Beaugrand M, Seror O. Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: long-term results and prognostic factors in 235 Western patients with cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2009 Nov;50(5):1475-83. doi: 10.1002/hep.23181.
PubMed 19731239Nault JC, Sutter O, Nahon P, Ganne-Carrie N, Seror O. Percutaneous treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: State of the art and innovations. J Hepatol. 2018 Apr;68(4):783-797. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
PubMed 29031662Seror O. Ablative therapies: Advantages and disadvantages of radiofrequency, cryotherapy, microwave and electroporation methods, or how to choose the right method for an individual patient? Diagn Interv Imaging. 2015 Jun;96(6):617-24. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2015.04.007. Epub 2015 May 14.
PubMed 25981214Seror O, N'Kontchou G, Ibraheem M, Ajavon Y, Barrucand C, Ganne N, Coderc E, Trinchet JC, Beaugrand M, Sellier N. Large (>or=5.0-cm) HCCs: multipolar RF ablation with three internally cooled bipolar electrodes--initial experience in 26 patients. Radiology. 2008 Jul;248(1):288-96. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2481071101. Epub 2008 May 15.
PubMed 18483229Sutter O, Calvo J, N'Kontchou G, Nault JC, Ourabia R, Nahon P, Ganne-Carrie N, Bourcier V, Zentar N, Bouhafs F, Sellier N, Diallo A, Seror O. Safety and Efficacy of Irreversible Electroporation for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Not Amenable to Thermal Ablation Techniques: A Retrospective Single-Center Case Series. Radiology. 2017 Sep;284(3):877-886. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017161413. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
PubMed 28453431Cheng RG, Bhattacharya R, Yeh MM, Padia SA. Irreversible Electroporation Can Effectively Ablate Hepatocellular Carcinoma to Complete Pathologic Necrosis. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015 Aug;26(8):1184-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.05.014. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
PubMed 26119204Niessen C, Beyer LP, Haimerl M, Schicho A, Stroszczynski C, Wiggermann P, Jung EM. Percutaneous irreversible electroporation of hepatocellular carcinoma: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound-findings during 1-year follow-up. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2019;72(1):85-93. doi: 10.3233/CH-180449.
PubMed 30584122Niessen C, Beyer LP, Pregler B, Dollinger M, Trabold B, Schlitt HJ, Jung EM, Stroszczynski C, Wiggermann P. Percutaneous Ablation of Hepatic Tumors Using Irreversible Electroporation: A Prospective Safety and Midterm Efficacy Study in 34 Patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016 Apr;27(4):480-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.12.025. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
PubMed 26922979Niessen C, Thumann S, Beyer L, Pregler B, Kramer J, Lang S, Teufel A, Jung EM, Stroszczynski C, Wiggermann P. Percutaneous Irreversible Electroporation: Long-term survival analysis of 71 patients with inoperable malignant hepatic tumors. Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 7;7:43687. doi: 10.1038/srep43687.
PubMed 28266600Bhutiani N, Philips P, Scoggins CR, McMasters KM, Potts MH, Martin RC. Evaluation of tolerability and efficacy of irreversible electroporation (IRE) in treatment of Child-Pugh B (7/8) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). HPB (Oxford). 2016 Jul;18(7):593-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.03.609. Epub 2016 May 1.
PubMed 27346140Bruix J, Takayama T, Mazzaferro V, Chau GY, Yang J, Kudo M, Cai J, Poon RT, Han KH, Tak WY, Lee HC, Song T, Roayaie S, Bolondi L, Lee KS, Makuuchi M, Souza F, Berre MA, Meinhardt G, Llovet JM; STORM investigators. Adjuvant sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma after resection or ablation (STORM): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Oct;16(13):1344-54. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00198-9. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
PubMed 26361969El-Khoueiry AB, Sangro B, Yau T, Crocenzi TS, Kudo M, Hsu C, Kim TY, Choo SP, Trojan J, Welling TH Rd, Meyer T, Kang YK, Yeo W, Chopra A, Anderson J, Dela Cruz C, Lang L, Neely J, Tang H, Dastani HB, Melero I. Nivolumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (CheckMate 040): an open-label, non-comparative, phase 1/2 dose escalation and expansion trial. Lancet. 2017 Jun 24;389(10088):2492-2502. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31046-2. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
PubMed 28434648Behm B, Di Fazio P, Michl P, Neureiter D, Kemmerling R, Hahn EG, Strobel D, Gress T, Schuppan D, Wissniowski TT. Additive antitumour response to the rabbit VX2 hepatoma by combined radio frequency ablation and toll like receptor 9 stimulation. Gut. 2016 Jan;65(1):134-43. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308286. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
PubMed 25524262Zerbini A, Pilli M, Laccabue D, Pelosi G, Molinari A, Negri E, Cerioni S, Fagnoni F, Soliani P, Ferrari C, Missale G. Radiofrequency thermal ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma stimulates autologous NK-cell response. Gastroenterology. 2010 May;138(5):1931-42. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.12.051. Epub 2010 Jan 11.
PubMed 20060829
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Durvalumab/Tremelimumab in Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Setting in Patients With HCC Treated by by Percutaneous Ablation Procedure in Curative Intent: French Multicenter Phase 2 Therapeutic
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06045975
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DUMELEP / APHP220729
- Conditions
- HCC - Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- Keywords
- HCC, Electroporation, immunotherapy, radiofrequency ablation, microwave
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- AstraZeneca
- Study start
- 28 Mar 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 Sep 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 27 Sep 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 21 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This project is a Phase 2 trial testing the safety and efficacy of treatment with Durvalumab/Tremelimumab in neoadjuvant and Durvalumab in adjuvant setting in patients with BCLC A HCC treated by by percutaneous ablation (PA) procedure in a curative intent.
DUMELEP is a Multicentre, Phase 2 trial
Eligible patients will receive consecutively:
- 1 Durvalumab 1500 mg/Tremelimumab 300 mg infusion in a neoadjuvant setting
- percutaneous ablation procedure in a curative attempt at Day 30
- 11 monthly Durvalumab 1500 mg infusions.
- Classical follow-up during an additional year (every 3 months)
Detailed description
Immunotherapy is currently the gold standard for first-line treatment of advanced HCC based of the combination of check-point inhibitors (CPI). The first approved regimen is based on the association of atezolizumab and bevacizumab, an antiangiogenic molecule. More recently, the HIMALAYA trial demonstrated the superiority of durvalumab-tremelimumab over sorafenib, establishing a new first-line option.The combination of Immunotherapy and locoregional treatments in earlier HCC stages may reduce relapse rates. Preliminary data from the IMBRAVE 050 trail reports lower rates of recurrence following HCC percutaneous ablation (PA) or resection associated with atezolizumab and bevacizumab in adjuvant setting.PA procedures and most likely electroporation induce T-cell recruitment that may foster immunomodulation. In particular, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) can lead to stimulation of NK cells with a more differentiated and proactivatory phenotypic profile with general increase of functional activities. As compared with RFA, these local changes of IRE induce more robust systemic effects, including both tumorigenic and immunogenic events. Indeed, the preservation of the tumor microvasculature and extracellular matrix within the coagulated zone would favour infiltration by anti tumoral immune cells. These observations are relevant for development of neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapeutic strategies in the setting of HCC treated by percutaneous ablation, and particularly IRE .
Neoadjuvant and adjuvant trials using these new molecules must now be cautiously designed based on the rigorous selection of special populations and therapeutic indications based on the following criteria:
- Exclusion of early forms of HCC with low probability of recurrence for statistical power issues
- Inclusion of patients with HCC treated in "curative intent" by new PA techniques such as electroporation
- Selective inclusion of patients treated with PA whose immunomodulatory properties are recognized
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Durvalumab/Tremelimumab | Experimental | Drug: Durvalumab/Tremelimumab in neoadjuvant and Durvalumab in adjuvant settingDurvalumab/Tremelimumab in neoadjuvant and Durvalumab in adjuvant setting |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (89 listed)
- Male or female patients ≥ 18 years of age.
- Histological or radiological diagnosis of HCC
- Patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent HCC (following a previous curative procedure performed at least 6 months before inclusion) eligible for PA as assessed by multidisciplinary board corresponding to BCLC A stage:
- Body weight >30 kg
- Liver function status Child-Pugh Class A
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Durvalumab/Tremelimumab in neoadjuvant and Durvalumab in adjuvant setting* Durvalumab 1500 mg/Tremelimumab 300 mg infusion in a neoadjuvant setting followed by PA procedure at Day 30+/-7 days * 11 monthly Durvalumab 1500 mg infusions. | Drug | Durvalumab/Tremelimumab |
Primary outcome
local recurrence-free survival
Time frame: 12 months after PA procedure
Local recurrence is defined as the emergence of irregular areas enhanced at arterial phase followed by wash out at portal phase observed next to the ablation zone
9 secondary outcomes
Changes of tumorous and non-tumorous perfusion parameters
Time frame: one month of neoadjuvant treatment
Changes of size of nodules following neoadjuvant course
Time frame: one month of neoadjuvant treatment
Incidences of intra segmental/ extra segmental distant recurrence
Time frame: Throughout the study, an average of 30 months
Overall survival
Time frame: 12 months after PA procedure
Overall survival
Time frame: 12 months after PA procedure
Treatment-related adverse events
Time frame: Throughout the study, an average of 30 months
Timeframe of PA performance
Time frame: one month of neoadjuvant treatment
Compliance to neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments
Time frame: during one cycle neoadjuvant treatment and 11 months starting after the PA evaluation
Safety of Durvalumab/Tremelimumab infusions
Time frame: Throughout the study, an average of 30 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Apr 2026.
- Background: PubMed 25678021Trinchet JC, Bourcier V, Chaffaut C, Ait Ahmed M, Allam S, Marcellin P, Guyader D, Pol S, Larrey D, De Ledinghen V, Ouzan D, Zoulim F, Roulot D, Tran A, Bronowicki JP, Zarski JP, Goria O, Cales P, Peron JM, Alric L, Bourliere M, Mathurin P, Blanc JF, Abergel A, Serfaty L, Mallat A, Grange JD, Buffet C, Bacq Y, Wartelle C, Dao T, Benhamou Y, Pilette C, Silvain C, Christidis C, Capron D, Thiefin G, Hillaire S, Di Martino V, Nahon P, Chevret S; ANRS CO12 CirVir Group. Complications and competing risks of death in compensated viral cirrhosis (ANRS CO12 CirVir prospective cohort). Hepatology. 2015 Sep;62(3):737-50. doi: 10.1002/hep.27743. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
- Background: PubMed 19731239N'Kontchou G, Mahamoudi A, Aout M, Ganne-Carrie N, Grando V, Coderc E, Vicaut E, Trinchet JC, Sellier N, Beaugrand M, Seror O. Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: long-term results and prognostic factors in 235 Western patients with cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2009 Nov;50(5):1475-83. doi: 10.1002/hep.23181.
- Background: PubMed 29031662Nault JC, Sutter O, Nahon P, Ganne-Carrie N, Seror O. Percutaneous treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: State of the art and innovations. J Hepatol. 2018 Apr;68(4):783-797. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
- Background: PubMed 25981214Seror O. Ablative therapies: Advantages and disadvantages of radiofrequency, cryotherapy, microwave and electroporation methods, or how to choose the right method for an individual patient? Diagn Interv Imaging. 2015 Jun;96(6):617-24. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2015.04.007. Epub 2015 May 14.
- Background: PubMed 18483229Seror O, N'Kontchou G, Ibraheem M, Ajavon Y, Barrucand C, Ganne N, Coderc E, Trinchet JC, Beaugrand M, Sellier N. Large (>or=5.0-cm) HCCs: multipolar RF ablation with three internally cooled bipolar electrodes--initial experience in 26 patients. Radiology. 2008 Jul;248(1):288-96. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2481071101. Epub 2008 May 15.
- Background: PubMed 28453431Sutter O, Calvo J, N'Kontchou G, Nault JC, Ourabia R, Nahon P, Ganne-Carrie N, Bourcier V, Zentar N, Bouhafs F, Sellier N, Diallo A, Seror O. Safety and Efficacy of Irreversible Electroporation for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Not Amenable to Thermal Ablation Techniques: A Retrospective Single-Center Case Series. Radiology. 2017 Sep;284(3):877-886. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017161413. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
- Background: PubMed 26119204Cheng RG, Bhattacharya R, Yeh MM, Padia SA. Irreversible Electroporation Can Effectively Ablate Hepatocellular Carcinoma to Complete Pathologic Necrosis. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015 Aug;26(8):1184-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.05.014. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
- Background: PubMed 30584122Niessen C, Beyer LP, Haimerl M, Schicho A, Stroszczynski C, Wiggermann P, Jung EM. Percutaneous irreversible electroporation of hepatocellular carcinoma: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound-findings during 1-year follow-up. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2019;72(1):85-93. doi: 10.3233/CH-180449.
- Background: PubMed 26922979Niessen C, Beyer LP, Pregler B, Dollinger M, Trabold B, Schlitt HJ, Jung EM, Stroszczynski C, Wiggermann P. Percutaneous Ablation of Hepatic Tumors Using Irreversible Electroporation: A Prospective Safety and Midterm Efficacy Study in 34 Patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016 Apr;27(4):480-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.12.025. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
- Background: PubMed 28266600Niessen C, Thumann S, Beyer L, Pregler B, Kramer J, Lang S, Teufel A, Jung EM, Stroszczynski C, Wiggermann P. Percutaneous Irreversible Electroporation: Long-term survival analysis of 71 patients with inoperable malignant hepatic tumors. Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 7;7:43687. doi: 10.1038/srep43687.
- Background: PubMed 27346140Bhutiani N, Philips P, Scoggins CR, McMasters KM, Potts MH, Martin RC. Evaluation of tolerability and efficacy of irreversible electroporation (IRE) in treatment of Child-Pugh B (7/8) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). HPB (Oxford). 2016 Jul;18(7):593-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.03.609. Epub 2016 May 1.
- Background: PubMed 26361969Bruix J, Takayama T, Mazzaferro V, Chau GY, Yang J, Kudo M, Cai J, Poon RT, Han KH, Tak WY, Lee HC, Song T, Roayaie S, Bolondi L, Lee KS, Makuuchi M, Souza F, Berre MA, Meinhardt G, Llovet JM; STORM investigators. Adjuvant sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma after resection or ablation (STORM): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Oct;16(13):1344-54. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00198-9. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
Related trials for HCC - Hepatocellular Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
Real-world Evaluation of the HistoSonics Edison System for Treatment of Liver Tumors Across Multidisciplinary Users (BOOMBOX: Master Study)
Liver Neoplasms, Primary Liver Cancer
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Prospective Exploratory Study of FAPi PET/CT With Histopathology Validation in Patients With Various Cancers
Bladder Carcinoma, Cervical Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
A Study to Evaluate Patient-Reported Satisfaction, Effectiveness, and Safety of Atezolizumab in Participants Treated in Routine Clinical Practice
Lung Cancer, Hepatocellular Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Perre NAHON, MD-PhD principal investigator
APHP
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Durvalumab/Tremelimumab in neoadjuvant and Durvalumab in adjuvant setting in people with HCC - Hepatocellular Carcinoma, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 89 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
local recurrence-free survival (time frame: 12 months after PA procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06045975, which also lists 21 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Apr 2026.