AzTrials
AzTrials

Lung CancerNCT06047301

Pathways, a Hope Intervention to Support Personal Goal Pursuit, Mental Health, and Quality of Life During Advanced Lung Cancer Treatment

A study testing Pathways in people with Lung Cancer, run by Laurie McLouth at 1 site in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will compare the effects of a brief supportive intervention, called Pathways, against enhanced usual care on the mental health and quality of life of people undergoing treatment for advanced lung cancer. Patients will complete baseline survey measures and be randomized to intervention. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Lung Cancer
What is being tested?
Pathways
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
234 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
29 Nov 2023to 31 Mar 2028
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • New or recurrent AJCC 8th edition stage 3b, 3c, or IV non-small cell lung cancer, extensive stage small cell lung cancer
  • 18 years of age or older
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2/Karnofsky 60-100
  • 3-12 weeks into systemic, infusion-based treatment (chemotherapy, immunotherapy, chemo-immunotherapy)
  • Past month distress score (per electronic health record) of 3/10 or higher OR a Rotterdam Symptom item score of 2 or higher for psychological distress items.

Who cannot join

  • Unstable brain metastases (i.e., progressive neurological deficits, inadequately controlled seizures, or requiring escalated steroid doses)
  • Cognitive (i.e., dementia) or psychiatric condition (e.g., psychotic disorder) for which participating would be inappropriate
  • Receiving overlapping palliative care or psychological services at the cancer center
  • Unable to speak and read English.
  • Hearing or visual impairment that precludes study participation

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Laurie McLouth, PhD contact

859-562-2526

laurie.mclouth@uky.edu

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • University of Kentucky

    Lexington, Kentucky, 40506

    Laurie McLouth, PhD

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Pathways, a Hope-Based Intervention to Support Personal Goal Pursuit, Mental Health, and Quality of Life During Treatment for Advanced Lung Cancer

This study will compare the effects of a brief supportive intervention, called Pathways, against enhanced usual care on the mental health and quality of life of people undergoing treatment for advanced lung cancer. Patients will complete baseline survey measures and be randomized to intervention. Survey measures will be collected again mid-intervention, post-intervention and at 6- and 12-week follow-up, with analyses focused on changes pre- to post-intervention.

Conditions
Lung Cancer
Being tested
Pathways, Enhanced Usual Care
Keywords
advanced cancer, palliative, supportive oncology, psychosocial intervention
Medical subject headings
Lung Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PathwaysBehavioural

    Delivered by a nurse or other healthcare provider, includes 2 in-person sessions, and phone check-ins, and occurs primarily during infusion visits. Includes a Pathways Toolkit with handouts on values and goal setting, as well as resources on symptom management, lung cancer stigma, communication strategies, and other cancer center resources.

  • Enhanced Usual CareBehavioural

    Pathways Toolkit handouts on symptom management, lung cancer stigma, communication strategies, and other cancer center resources provided to participants. The Toolkit will be reviewed with patients in person to orient them to its purpose and contents.

Study groups in NCT06047301
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PathwaysExperimentalPathways focuses on increasing patient hope to support personal goal pursuit during treatment for advanced lung cancer.
Receives: Behavioral: Pathways
Enhanced Usual CareActive comparatorEnhanced Usual Care focuses on providing patients with education around common lung cancer concerns (e.g., pain and fatigue management) and resources to support them (e.g., supportive services available nationally and at the treating cancer center).
Receives: Behavioral: Enhanced Usual Care

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in PROMIS Depression Short Form Scores

    Depression symptoms will be measured using the PROMIS Depression Short Form 6a: 6 items are responded to on a scale of 1 = never to 5 = always. Raw scores range from 6 to 30.

    Higher scores indicate more depression.

    Measured: 12 weeks (Baseline, Post-Intervention)

  2. Change in State Hope scores

    Hope will be measured using Snyder's State Hope Scale. 6 items responded to on a scale of 1 = definitely false to 8 = definitely true. Raw scores range from 6 to 48. Items are summed for a total score. Higher scores indicate higher hope.

    Measured: 12 weeks (Baseline, Post-Intervention)

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Change in PROMIS Anxiety Short Form Scores

    Anxiety symptoms are measured using the PROMIS Anxiety Short Form 4a. 4 items are responded to on a scale of 1 = never to 5 = always. Raw scores range from 4 to 20. Higher scores indicate more anxiety.

    Measured: 12 weeks (Baseline, Post-Intervention)

  2. Change in Demoralization Scale II Scores

    Demoralization symptoms are measured using the Demoralization Scale II: 16 items are responded to on a scale of 0 = never to 2 = always; Raw scores range from 0-32. Higher scores indicate more demoralization.

    Measured: 12 weeks (Baseline, Post-Intervention)

  3. Change in PROMIS 15a positive affect scores

    Positive affect is measured using the PROMIS 15a positive affect form. Higher scores indicate more positive affect. Items are responded to on a scale of 1 = never to 5 = always. Raw scores range from 15 to 45. Higher scores indicate more positive affect.

    Measured: 12 weeks (Baseline, Post-Intervention)

  4. Change in FACIT-Spiritual Well-being Meaning/Peace Subscale Scores

    Meaning/Peace is measured using the FACIT-Spiritual Well-being Meaning/Peace Subscale. 8 items are responded to on a scale of 0 = not at all to 4 = very much. Raw scores range from 0-32. Higher scores indicate more meaning/peace.

    Measured: 12 weeks (Baseline, Post-Intervention)

  5. Change in FACT-G7 Quality of Life Scores

    Quality of Life is measured using the FACT-G7. 7 items are responded to on a scale of 0 = not at all to 4 = very much to assess physical, emotional, and functional wellbeing. Raw scores range from 0 to 28. Higher scores indicate better quality of life.

    Measured: 12 weeks (Baseline, Post-Intervention)

  6. Change in PROMIS Satisfaction with Participation in Social Roles 8a Short Form Scores

    Satisfaction with Social Activities and Roles is measured using the ROMIS Satisfaction with Participation in Social Roles 8a Short Form. 8 items are responded to on a scale of 1 = not at all to 5 = very much. Raw scores range from 8 to 40. Higher scores indicate better function.

    Measured: 12 weeks (Baseline, Post-Intervention)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Sep 2023
  2. Study start29 Nov 2023
  3. Primary completion31 Mar 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Mar 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
234 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06047301
Sponsor's protocol ID
87901
Other IDs
1R01CA283929-01
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
14 Sep 2023
Last updated
8 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Data Description: The proposed research will include clinical and patient-reported outcome data from approximately 234 participants with advanced stage lung cancer. Patients will complete surveys prior to randomization, mid-intervention period, post-intervention, and at follow-ups. In addition to these survey data, disease and medical treatment information will be abstracted from the electronic health record, including cancer treatments received, performance status, hospitalizations, and death. Data Archive: Data from this study will be submitted to ICPSR (Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research), which will make de-identified data available as described under "access criteria."

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Pathways in people with Lung Cancer, run by Laurie McLouth at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Laurie McLouth, PhD (859-562-2526, laurie.mclouth@uky.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in PROMIS Depression Short Form Scores (time frame: 12 weeks (Baseline, Post-Intervention)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 May 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in