AzTrials
AzTrials

Transverse MyelitisNCT06055998

Frequency ,Etiology and Prognostic Factors of Acute Transverse Myelitis

An observational study of Transverse Myelitis, run by Assiut University.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To identify the frequency of ATM and its different aetiologies, alongside the different clinical and radiological patterns and prognostic factors . Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Transverse Myelitis
What is being tested?
MRI
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
50 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Dec 2023to Feb 2026
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: All cases of all ages and both sex attending the neurology and psychiatry department at Assiut University Hospital during one year period who meet the diagnostic criteria of ATM according to the TM Consortium Working Group (TMCWG) in 2002 will be recriuted

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnostic criteria include:
  • Sensory, motor, or autonomic dysfunction originating from the spinal cord
  • T2 hyperintense signal changes on MRI
  • No evidence of a compressive lesion
  • Bilateral signs/symptoms.
  • Clearly defined sensory level.
  • Evidence of inflammatory process demonstrated by gadolinium enhancement on MRI, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis showing pleocytosis, or elevated immunoglobulin G (IgG) index.
  • Progression to nadir between 4 hours and 21 days.

Who cannot join

  • An alternative diagnosis became apparent any time along the study period including evidence of compressive lesion in MRI, history of previous radiation to the spine within the past 10 years, clinical deficit consistent with thrombosis of the anterior spinal artery or Abnormal flow voids on the surface of the spinal cord consistent with AVFs.
  • Incomplete clinical, laboratory or radiographic data.
  • Patients refused to sign the informed consent

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Fouad E Fawaz, Resident contact

+201030698686

fouadabdelrahman55@gmail.com

About this study

Official title: Frequency ,Etiology and Prognostic Factors of Acute Transverse Myelitis in Neurology and Psychiatry Department, Assiut University

To identify the frequency of ATM and its different aetiologies, alongside the different clinical and radiological patterns and prognostic factors .

Read the detailed description

Acute transverse myelitis (ATM) is an inflammatory condition of the spinal cord, covering the entire cross section and spreading on two or more vertebral segments, without evidence of a compressive lesion.1 This shows clinically as acute or subacute spinal cord dysfunction resulting in paresis, sensory level, and autonomic (bladder, bowel, and sexual) impairment below the level of the lesion.2 ATM is typically classified as either idiopathic ATM where no causative factor found or disease- associated transverse myelitis.3 Disease- associated transverse myelitis results from heterogenous pathophysiologic causes including infectious, parainfectious, paraneoplastic, drug/toxin-induced, systemic autoimmune disorders (SAIDs), Neurosarcoidosis and acquired demyelinating diseases like multiple sclerosis (MS) or neuromyelitis optica (NMO).4 5 6 The annual incidence of ATM ranges from 1.34 to 4.60 cases per million,7 8 but increases to 24.6 cases per million if acquired demyelinating diseases like MS are included.9 TM can occur at any age, although a bimodal peak in incidence occurs in the second and fourth decades of life.7 8 10 This broad differential can overlap with noninflammatory myelopathies and can be very challenging for clinicians to navigate, causing delays in diagnosis or treatment.11 MRI is essential to rule out compressive causes of these neurologic manifestations, such as tumour, epidural abscess, herniated disc, stenosis of the medullary canal or hematoma. It is also used to show the extension of the lesion and for follow-up progress of these lesions after treatment.12 The lack of large-scale and longitudinal studies has hindered the understanding of this complex disorder.

Approximately 33% of patients recover with little to no lasting deficits, 33% have a moderate degree of permanent disability, and 33% are permanently disabled.13 The disease is often a monophasic illness and will only not recur unless it is secondary to a chronic comorbid condition, highlight the need for early and prompt recognition of aetiology. Steroids and immunosuppression are the only potential treatments for ATM at this time, but there is potential for monoclonal antibody drugs that might alter the disease course if an autoinflammatory process was identified. Although individuals affected by ATM show residual neurologic deficits if they have not recovered to normal within 3-6 months, no report has considered earlier factors that might determine the prognosis of the illness. The objective of this study was to determine frequency of ATM and its different etiologies, clinical and radiological patterns, and the different prognostic factors associated in a large tertiary center in the south of Egypt with a goal to improve awareness of ATM to ensure prompt recognition and treatment

Being tested
MRI
Medical subject headings
Myelitis, Transverse

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MRIDevice

    MRI SPINE

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Determine the relative frequency of different aetiologies of ATM among Southern Egyptian patients attending Assiut University Hospital

    All cases of all ages and both sex attending the neurology and psychiatry department at Assiut University Hospital during one year period who meet the diagnostic criteria of ATM according to the TM

    Consortium Working Group (TMCWG) in 2002 will be recriuted.1 Diagnostic criteria include:

    1. Sensory, motor, or autonomic dysfunction originating from the spinal cord
    2. T2 hyperintense signal changes on MRI
    3. No evidence of a compressive lesion
    4. Bilateral signs/symptoms.
    5. Clearly defined sensory level.
    6. Evidence of inflammatory process demonstrated by gadolinium enhancement on MRI, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis showing pleocytosis, or elevated immunoglobulin G (IgG) index.
    7. Progression to nadir between 4 hours and 21days.

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Sep 2023
  2. Study startDec 2023 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionDec 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completionFeb 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case crossover
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06055998
Sponsor's protocol ID
acute transverse myelitis
Status last verified
Sep 2023
First submitted
11 Sep 2023
Last updated
28 Sep 2023
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Harizi E, Shemsi K, Kola E, Hyseni F, Kola I, Siddique MA, Sadeque J, Decka A, Dervishi M, Nasir F, Capi L, Ayala I, Ghosh AS, Swarna SS, Musa J, Ahmetgjekaj I. Transverse myelitis in a 26-year-old male with tuberculosis. Radiol Case Rep. 2022 Aug 1;17(10):3669-3673. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2022.06.091. eCollection 2022 Oct.

    PubMed 35936885
  • Murthy JM, Reddy JJ, Meena AK, Kaul S. Acute transverse myelitis: MR characteristics. Neurol India. 1999 Dec;47(4):290-3.

    PubMed 10625901
  • Beh SC, Greenberg BM, Frohman T, Frohman EM. Transverse myelitis. Neurol Clin. 2013 Feb;31(1):79-138. doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2012.09.008.

    PubMed 23186897
  • Christensen PB, Wermuth L, Hinge HH, Bomers K. Clinical course and long-term prognosis of acute transverse myelopathy. Acta Neurol Scand. 1990 May;81(5):431-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1990.tb00990.x.

    PubMed 2375246
  • Bhat A, Naguwa S, Cheema G, Gershwin ME. The epidemiology of transverse myelitis. Autoimmun Rev. 2010 Mar;9(5):A395-9. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2009.12.007. Epub 2009 Dec 24.

    PubMed 20035902
  • Debette S, de Seze J, Pruvo JP, Zephir H, Pasquier F, Leys D, Vermersch P. Long-term outcome of acute and subacute myelopathies. J Neurol. 2009 Jun;256(6):980-8. doi: 10.1007/s00415-009-5058-x. Epub 2009 Feb 28.

    PubMed 19252779
  • Berman M, Feldman S, Alter M, Zilber N, Kahana E. Acute transverse myelitis: incidence and etiologic considerations. Neurology. 1981 Aug;31(8):966-71. doi: 10.1212/wnl.31.8.966.

    PubMed 7196523
  • Wingerchuk DM. Postinfectious encephalomyelitis. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2003 May;3(3):256-64. doi: 10.1007/s11910-003-0086-x.

    PubMed 12691631
  • Jacob A, Weinshenker BG. An approach to the diagnosis of acute transverse myelitis. Semin Neurol. 2008 Feb;28(1):105-20. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1019132.

    PubMed 18256991
  • de Seze J, Stojkovic T, Breteau G, Lucas C, Michon-Pasturel U, Gauvrit JY, Hachulla E, Mounier-Vehier F, Pruvo JP, Leys D, Destee A, Hatron PY, Vermersch P. Acute myelopathies: Clinical, laboratory and outcome profiles in 79 cases. Brain. 2001 Aug;124(Pt 8):1509-21. doi: 10.1093/brain/124.8.1509.

    PubMed 11459743
  • Frohman EM, Wingerchuk DM. Clinical practice. Transverse myelitis. N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 5;363(6):564-72. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1001112. No abstract available.

    PubMed 20818891
  • Dumic I, Vitorovic D, Spritzer S, Sviggum E, Patel J, Ramanan P. Acute transverse myelitis - A rare clinical manifestation of Lyme neuroborreliosis. IDCases. 2018 Dec 29;15:e00479. doi: 10.1016/j.idcr.2018.e00479. eCollection 2019.

    PubMed 30622896
  • Transverse Myelitis Consortium Working Group. Proposed diagnostic criteria and nosology of acute transverse myelitis. Neurology. 2002 Aug 27;59(4):499-505. doi: 10.1212/wnl.59.4.499.

    PubMed 12236201

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Transverse Myelitis, run by Assiut University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Fouad E Fawaz, Resident (+201030698686, fouadabdelrahman55@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Determine the relative frequency of different aetiologies of ATM among Southern Egyptian patients attending Assiut University Hospital (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06055998, which also lists 13 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Sep 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in