AzTrials
AzTrials

Urinary Tract InfectionPhase 3PIVOT-PONCT06059846

A Study of Oral Tebipenem Pivoxil Hydrobromide (TBP-PI-HBr) Compared to Intravenous Imipenem-cilastatin in Participants With Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) or Acute Pyelonephritis (AP)

A Phase 3 study testing TBP-PI-HBr, Imipenem-cilastatin and Dummy Infusion in people with Urinary Tract Infection and Acute Pyelonephritis, run by Spero Therapeutics at 85 sites in 19 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of oral TBP-PI-HBr as compared with intravenous (IV) imipenem-cilastatin with respect to the overall response (combined clinical cure plus microbiological eradication) at the Test-of-Cure (TOC) visit in hospitalized adult participants (greater than or equal… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Urinary Tract Infection, Acute Pyelonephritis
What is being tested?
TBP-PI-HBr, Imipenem-cilastatin and Dummy Infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,690 participants
Where
85 sitesin 19 countries
Study dates
21 Dec 2023to 6 Feb 2025
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Have a diagnosis of cUTI or AP.
  • Have an adequate urine specimen for evaluation and culture obtained within 24 hours prior to randomization with evidence of pyuria that includes at least one of the following:
  • at least 10 white blood cells (WBCs) per high power field (HPF) in urine sediment
  • at least 10 WBCs per millimeters cubed (mm^3) in unspun urine
  • positive leukocyte esterase (LE) on urinalysis Note: Participants may be randomized and administered study drug prior to knowledge of urine culture results, but pyuria must be documented.
  • Expectation, in the judgment of the Investigator, that the participant will survive with effective antimicrobial therapy and appropriate supportive care for the anticipated duration of the study.

Who cannot join

  • Presence of any known or suspected disease or condition that may confound the assessment of efficacy.
  • Gross hematuria requiring intervention other than administration of study drug or removal/placement of urinary tract instrumentation.
  • Urinary tract surgery within 7 days prior to randomization or urinary tract surgery planned during the study period.
  • Creatinine clearance (CrCl) of ≤30 milliliters per minute (mL/min), as estimated by the Cockcroft-Gault formula.
  • Anticipated concomitant use of non-study antimicrobial drug therapy between randomization and the LFU visit that would potentially effect outcome evaluations of cUTI/AP.
  • Receipt of a potentially effective antimicrobial within 72 hours prior to study randomization.
Show all 15Show fewer
  • Severe hepatic impairment at Screening, as evidenced by alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) >5×upper limit of normal (ULN) or total bilirubin >3×ULN, or clinical signs of cirrhosis or end-stage hepatic disease (e.g., ascites, hepatic encephalopathy).
  • Pregnant or lactating women.
  • History of epilepsy or known seizure disorder (excluding a history of childhood febrile seizures).
  • History of proven or suspected Clostridioides difficile associated diarrhoea.
  • History of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.
  • QT interval corrected using Fridericia's formula (QTcF) >480 milliseconds (msec) based on screening ECG.
  • History of known genetic metabolism anomaly associated with carnitine deficiency.
  • Requirement for concomitant use of valproic acid, divalproex sodium, or probenecid between randomization and EOT.
  • Note: Other inclusion and exclusion criteria as per protocol may apply.

Trial locations and contacts

85 sites in 19 countries.

85 sites in 19 countries

Bulgaria11 sites
  • Medical Facility

    Blagoevgrad

  • Medical Facility

    Dobrich

  • Medical Facility

    Gabrovo

  • Medical facility

    Lom

  • Medical Facility

    Pleven

  • Medical Facility

    Plovdiv

  • Medical facility

    Rousse

  • Medical facility

    Shumen

  • Medical Facility

    Sliven

  • Medical facility

    Sofia

  • Medical Facility

    Varna

Other trials in Bulgaria

Argentina6 sites
  • Medical Facility

    Buenos Aires

  • Medical Facility

    Córdoba

  • Medical Facility

    La Plata

  • Medical Facility

    Mendoza

  • Medical Facility

    San Miguel de Tucumán

  • Medical Facility

    Villa Regina

Other trials in Argentina

Romania6 sites
  • Medical Facility

    Brasov

  • Medical facility

    Bucharest

  • Medical facility

    Craiova

  • Medical Facility

    Iași

  • Medical Facility

    Oradea

  • Medical Facility

    Timișoara

Other trials in Romania

Brazil5 sites
  • Medical Facility

    Barueri

  • Medical Facility

    Campinas

  • Medical Facility

    Curitiba

  • Medical Facility

    Porto Alegre

  • Medical Facility

    São José do Rio Preto

Other trials in Brazil

Estonia5 sites
  • Medical Facility

    Kohtla-Järve

  • Medical Facility

    Pärnu

  • Medical Facility

    Tallinn

  • Medical Facility

    Tartu, 50406

  • Medical Facility

    Võru

Other trials in Estonia

Greece5 sites
  • Medical Facility

    Alexandroupoli

  • Medical Facility

    Athens

  • Medical Facility

    Ioannina

  • Medical Facility

    Pátrai

  • Medical Facility

    Thessaloniki

Other trials in Greece

India5 sites
  • Medical Facility

    Bangalore

  • Medical Facility

    Belagavi, Karnataka, 590010

  • Medical Facility

    Jaipur

  • Medical Facility

    Lucknow

  • Medical Facility

    Varanasi

Other trials in India

Slovakia5 sites
  • Medical Facility

    Bratislava

  • Medical Facility

    Galanta

  • Medical Facility

    Lučenec

  • Medical Facility

    Malacky

  • Medical Facility

    Poprad

Other trials in Slovakia

South Africa5 sites
  • Medical facility

    Benoni

  • Medical facility

    Durban

  • Medical Facility

    Pretoria

  • Medical Facility

    Tongaat

  • Medical Facility

    Umhlanga

Other trials in South Africa

Turkey (Türkiye)5 sites
  • Medical Facility

    Ankara

  • Medical Facility

    Diyarbakır

  • Medical Facility

    Istanbul

  • Medical Facility

    Izmir

  • Medical Facility

    Samsun

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

Croatia4 sites
  • Medical Facility

    Čakovec

  • Medical Facility

    Slavonski Brod

  • Medical Facility

    Split

  • Medical Facility

    Zagreb

Other trials in Croatia

Hungary4 sites
  • Medical Facility

    Budapest

  • Medical Facility

    Eger

  • Medical Facility

    Kistarcsa

  • Medical Facility

    Nyíregyháza

Other trials in Hungary

Latvia4 sites
  • Medical Facility

    Daugavpils

  • Medical Facility

    Liepāja

  • Medical Facility

    Riga

  • Medical Facility

    Valmiera

Other trials in Latvia

Poland4 sites
  • Medical Facility

    Krakow

  • Medical Facility

    Łęczna

  • Medical Facility

    Lodz

  • Medical Facility

    Warsaw

Other trials in Poland

Serbia4 sites
  • Medical facility

    Belgrade

  • Medical facility

    Kragujevac

  • Medical facility

    Niš

  • Medical facility

    Novi Sad

Other trials in Serbia

Bosnia and Herzegovina3 sites
  • Medical Facility

    Banja Luka

  • Medical Facility

    Sarajevo

  • Medical Facility

    Tuzla

Other trials in Bosnia and Herzegovina

United States2 sites
  • Medical facility

    Miami, Florida, 33144

  • Medical Facility

    Miami, Florida, 33176

Other trials in United States

Georgia1 site
  • Medical facility

    Tbilisi

Other trials in Georgia

Moldova1 site
  • Medical Facility

    Chisinau

Other trials in Moldova

About this study

Official title: A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Multicenter, Multinational Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Orally Administered Tebipenem Pivoxil Hydrobromide (TBP-PI-HBr) Compared to Intravenously Administered Imipenem-cilastatin in Patients With Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) or Acute Pyelonephritis (AP)

The primary purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of oral TBP-PI-HBr as compared with intravenous (IV) imipenem-cilastatin with respect to the overall response (combined clinical cure plus microbiological eradication) at the Test-of-Cure (TOC) visit in hospitalized adult participants (greater than or equal to (≥)18 years of age) with cUTI or AP.

Read the detailed description

The study included a pre-planned interim analysis with stopping criteria for efficacy and futility that was performed by an independent data monitoring committee (IDMC). For full details please refer to the protocol and statistical analysis plan.

Being tested
TBP-PI-HBr, Imipenem-cilastatin, Dummy Infusion, Dummy Tablets
Medical subject headings
Urinary Tract Infections

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • TBP-PI-HBrDrug

    Also called SPR994

    TBP-PI-HBr film-coated immediate-release tablets.

  • Imipenem-cilastatinDrug

    Sterile powder for reconstitution administered as IV.

  • Dummy InfusionDrug

    0.9% sodium chloride administered as IV infusion.

  • Dummy TabletsDrug

    TBP-PI-HBr matching dummy tablets.

Study groups in NCT06059846
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TBP-PI-HBrExperimentalParticipants received TBP-PI-HBr 600 milligrams (mg), two x 300mg film-coated tablets, orally (PO) and a dummy infusion intravenously (IV), every 6 hours (q6h) from Day 1 through Day 10. Participants with estimated baseline creatinine clearance (CrCl) greater than (>) 30 millilitres per minute (mL/min) and less than or equal to (≤) 50 mL/min received TBP-PI-HBr 300 mg q6h.
Receives: Drug: TBP-PI-HBr; Drug: Dummy Infusion
Imipenem-cilastatinActive comparatorParticipants received imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg, IV and matched dummy tablets, PO, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Dose adjustments for imipenem-cilastatin were made for participants with estimated baseline CrCl less than (<) 90mL/min per approved imipenem-cilastatin package insert. Participants with baseline CrCl levels greater than or equal to (≥) 60 to < 90 mL/min were administered imipenem-cilastatin, 400 mg IV q6h and participants with baseline CrCl levels >30 to <60 mL/min, were administered 300mg IV, q6h.
Receives: Drug: Imipenem-cilastatin; Drug: Dummy Tablets

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With Overall Response at the Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiological Intent-to-Treat (Micro-ITT) Population

    Overall response includes combined clinical cure plus microbiological eradication. Clinical cure is defined as a complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP present at baseline and no new symptoms, such that no further antibacterial therapy is warranted, and participant is alive. Microbiological eradication (favorable microbiological response) is defined as a reduction of baseline uropathogens to <10^3 CFU/mL and negative repeated blood culture if blood culture was positive for uropathogen growth at baseline and participant is alive.

    Measured: At Day 17 (TOC)

Secondary outcomes (19)
  1. Number of Participants With Overall Response (Combined Per-Participant Clinical Cure and Favorable Microbiological Response) at the TOC Visit in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population

    Overall response includes combined clinical cure plus microbiological eradication. Clinical cure is defined as a complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP present at baseline and no new symptoms, such that no further antibacterial therapy is warranted, and participant is alive. Microbiological eradication (favorable microbiological response) is defined as a reduction of baseline uropathogens to <10^3 CFU/mL and negative repeated blood culture if blood culture was positive for uropathogen growth at baseline and participant is alive.

    Measured: At Day 17 (TOC)

  2. Number of Participants With Overall Response at the End-of-Treatment (EOT) and Late Follow-Up (LFU) Visits in the Micro-ITT Population

    Overall response includes combined clinical cure plus microbiological eradication. Clinical cure is defined as a complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP present at baseline and no new symptoms, such that no further antibacterial therapy is warranted, and participant is alive. Microbiological eradication (favorable microbiological response) is defined as a reduction of baseline uropathogens to <10^3 CFU/mL and negative repeated blood culture if blood culture was positive for uropathogen growth at baseline and participant is alive.

    Measured: At Day 10 (EOT) and Day 28 (LFU)

  3. Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT and LFU Visits in the ME Population

    Overall response includes combined clinical cure plus microbiological eradication. Clinical cure is defined as a complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP present at baseline and no new symptoms, such that no further antibacterial therapy is warranted, and participant is alive. Microbiological eradication (favorable microbiological response) is defined as a reduction of baseline uropathogens to <10^3 CFU/mL and negative repeated blood culture if blood culture was positive for uropathogen growth at baseline and participant is alive.

    Measured: At Day 10 (EOT) and Day 28 (LFU)

  4. Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the Micro-ITT Population

    Clinical response at EOT and TOC is based on the Investigator's assessment of changes in baseline cUTI/AP signs and symptoms. Clinical cure: complete resolution or marked improvement of baseline symptoms with no new symptoms and no need for additional antimicrobial therapy. Clinical failure: baseline symptoms not fully resolved, new symptoms occur requiring non-study antibiotics, or death. Clinical indeterminate: insufficient data to classify response (e.g., lost to follow-up or missing data). Clinical response at LFU is based on change from baseline. Cure, including sustained clinical cure: met cure criteria at TOC and remained free of new or recurrent cUTI/AP symptoms at LFU with no need for further antibiotics. Failure, including clinical relapse: met cure criteria at TOC but developed new cUTI/AP symptoms at LFU requiring antibiotics. Clinical indeterminate: insufficient data to classify as sustained cure or relapse.

    Measured: At Day 10 (EOT), Day 17 (TOC), and Day 28 (LFU)

  5. Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the CE Population

    Clinical response at EOT and TOC is based on the Investigator's assessment of changes in baseline cUTI/AP signs and symptoms. Clinical cure: complete resolution or marked improvement of baseline symptoms with no new symptoms and no need for additional antimicrobial therapy. Clinical failure: baseline symptoms not fully resolved, new symptoms occur requiring non-study antibiotics, or death. Clinical indeterminate: insufficient data to classify response (e.g., lost to follow-up or missing data). Clinical response at LFU is based on change from baseline. Cure, including sustained clinical cure: met cure criteria at TOC and remained free of new or recurrent cUTI/AP symptoms at LFU with no need for further antibiotics. Failure, including clinical relapse: met cure criteria at TOC but developed new cUTI/AP symptoms at LFU requiring antibiotics. Clinical indeterminate: insufficient data to classify as sustained cure or relapse.

    Measured: At Day 10 (EOT), Day 17 (TOC), and Day 28 (LFU)

  6. Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the ME Population

    Clinical response at EOT and TOC is based on the Investigator's assessment of changes in baseline cUTI/AP signs and symptoms. Clinical cure: complete resolution or marked improvement of baseline symptoms with no new symptoms and no need for additional antimicrobial therapy. Clinical failure: baseline symptoms not fully resolved, new symptoms occur requiring non-study antibiotics, or death. Clinical indeterminate: insufficient data to classify response (e.g., lost to follow-up or missing data). Clinical response at LFU is based on change from baseline. Cure, including sustained clinical cure: met cure criteria at TOC and remained free of new or recurrent cUTI/AP symptoms at LFU with no need for further antibiotics. Failure, including clinical relapse: met cure criteria at TOC but developed new cUTI/AP symptoms at LFU requiring antibiotics. Clinical indeterminate: insufficient data to classify as sustained cure or relapse.

    Measured: At Day 10 (EOT), Day 17 (TOC), and Day 28 (LFU)

  7. Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the Micro-ITT Population

    Participants were evaluated for microbiological response based on blood and urine cultures as: Eradication, defined as reduction of Baseline uropathogens to <10^3 CFU/mL on urine culture and negative repeated blood culture (if blood culture was positive at Baseline) ;Persistence, defined as Isolation from urine culture of ≥10^3 CFU/mL or from blood of any of the Baseline uropathogen(s) identified at study entry; Indeterminate: no follow-up urine culture is available, or urine culture results are missing, or follow-up urine culture cannot be interpreted for any reason.

    Measured: At Day 10 (EOT), Day 17 (TOC), and Day 28 (LFU)

  8. Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the ME Population

    Participants were evaluated for microbiological response based on blood and urine cultures as: Eradication, defined as reduction of baseline uropathogens to <10^3 CFU/mL on urine culture and negative repeated blood culture (if blood culture was positive at Baseline); Persistence, defined as Isolation from urine culture of ≥10^3 CFU/mL or from blood of any of the Baseline uropathogen(s) identified at study entry; Indeterminate: no follow-up urine culture is available, or urine culture results are missing, or follow-up urine culture cannot be interpreted for any reason.

    Measured: At Day 10 (EOT), Day 17 (TOC) and Day 28 (LFU)

  9. Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in Micro-ITT Population

    Overall response includes combined clinical cure plus microbiological eradication. Clinical cure is defined as a complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP present at baseline and no new symptoms, such that no further antibacterial therapy is warranted, and participant is alive. Microbiological eradication (favorable microbiological response) is defined as a reduction of baseline uropathogens to <10^3 CFU/mL and negative repeated blood culture if blood culture was positive for uropathogen growth at baseline and participant is alive.

    Measured: Day 10 (EOT), Day 17 (TOC) and Day 28 (LFU)

  10. Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population

    Overall response includes combined clinical cure plus microbiological eradication. Clinical cure is defined as a complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP present at baseline and no new symptoms, such that no further antibacterial therapy is warranted, and participant is alive. Microbiological eradication (favorable microbiological response) is defined as a reduction of baseline uropathogens to <10^3 CFU/mL and negative repeated blood culture if blood culture was positive for uropathogen growth at baseline and participant is alive.

    Measured: Day 10 (EOT), Day 17 (TOC) and Day 28 (LFU)

  11. Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population

    Participants were evaluated for clinical response outcome based on assessment of signs and symptoms as: Cure, including sustained clinical cure (defined as met criteria for clinical cure at TOC, and remained free of new or recurrent signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP at LFU visit such that no further antibacterial therapy is warranted); Failure, including clinical relapse (defined as met criteria for clinical cure at TOC, but new signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP are present at LFU visit and participant requires antibacterial therapy for cUTI); or Clinical indeterminate: insufficient data are available to determine if participant is a sustained clinical cure or clinical relapse. If a participant is assessed as a clinical failure at EOT, participant is automatically considered a failure at TOC and LFU visits. If a participant is assessed as a clinical failure at TOC, participant is automatically considered a failure at LFU visit.

    Measured: Day 10 (EOT) and Day 17 (TOC)

  12. Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the LFU Visit in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population

    Participants were evaluated for clinical response outcome based on assessment of signs and symptoms as: Cure, including sustained clinical cure (defined as met criteria for clinical cure at TOC, and remained free of new or recurrent signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP at LFU visit such that no further antibacterial therapy is warranted); Failure, including clinical relapse (defined as met criteria for clinical cure at TOC, but new signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP are present at LFU visit and participant requires antibacterial therapy for cUTI); or Clinical indeterminate: insufficient data are available to determine if participant is a sustained clinical cure or clinical relapse. If a participant is assessed as a clinical failure at EOT, participant is automatically considered a failure at TOC and LFU visits. If a participant is assessed as a clinical failure at TOC, participant is automatically considered a failure at LFU visit.

    Measured: At Day 28 (LFU)

  13. Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population

    Participants were evaluated for clinical response outcome based on assessment of signs and symptoms as: Cure, including sustained clinical cure: Sustained clinical cure is defined as met criteria for clinical cure at TOC, and remained free of new or recurrent signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP at LFU visit such that no further antibacterial therapy is warranted; Failure, including clinical relapse: Clinical relapse is defined as met criteria for clinical cure at TOC, but new signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP are present at LFU visit and participant requires antibacterial therapy for cUTI; Clinical indeterminate: insufficient data are available to determine if participant is a sustained clinical cure or clinical relapse. If a participant is assessed as a clinical failure at EOT, participant is automatically considered a failure at TOC and LFU visits. If a participant is assessed as a clinical failure at TOC, participant is automatically considered a failure at LFU visit.

    Measured: Day 10 (EOT), Day 17 (TOC) and Day 28(LFU)

  14. Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population

    Participants were evaluated for microbiological response based on blood and urine cultures as: Eradication, including sustained microbiologic eradication, i.e.,microbiologic eradication at TOC and no subsequent urine culture after TOC demonstrating recurrence of original Baseline uropathogen at ≥10^3 CFU/mL;Persistence, including microbiologic recurrence, i.e.,isolation from urine culture at ≥10^3 CFU/mL or blood culture of any of Baseline uropathogen(s) at any time after documented eradication at TOC visit up to and including LFU visit; Microbiologic indeterminate: no follow-up urine culture is available, or urine culture results are missing, or follow-up urine culture cannot be interpreted for any reason. If a participant is assessed as a microbiological persistence at EOT, participant is automatically considered persistent at TOC and LFU. If assessed as persistent at TOC, participant is automatically considered a persistent at LFU.

    Measured: Day 10 (EOT) and Day 17 (TOC)

  15. Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the LFU Visit in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population

    Participants were evaluated for clinical response outcome based on assessment of signs and symptoms as: Cure, including sustained clinical cure: Sustained clinical cure is defined as met criteria for clinical cure at TOC, and remained free of new or recurrent signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP at LFU visit such that no further antibacterial therapy is warranted; Failure, including clinical relapse: Clinical relapse is defined as met criteria for clinical cure at TOC, but new signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP are present at LFU visit and participant requires antibacterial therapy for cUTI; Clinical indeterminate: insufficient data are available to determine if participant is a sustained clinical cure or clinical relapse. If a participant is assessed as a clinical failure at EOT, participant is automatically considered a failure at TOC and LFU visits. If a participant is assessed as a clinical failure at TOC, participant is automatically considered a failure at LFU visit.

    Measured: At Day 28 (LFU)

  16. Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population

    Participants were evaluated for microbiological response based on blood and urine cultures as: Eradication, including sustained microbiologic eradication, i.e.,microbiologic eradication at TOC and no subsequent urine culture after TOC demonstrating recurrence of original Baseline uropathogen at ≥10^3 CFU/mL;Persistence, including microbiologic recurrence, i.e.,isolation from urine culture at ≥10^3 CFU/mL or blood culture of any of Baseline uropathogen(s) at any time after documented eradication at TOC visit up to and including LFU visit; Microbiologic indeterminate: no follow-up urine culture is available, or urine culture results are missing, or follow-up urine culture cannot be interpreted for any reason. If a participant is assessed as a microbiological persistence at EOT, participant is automatically considered persistent at TOC and LFU. If assessed as persistent at TOC, participant is automatically considered a persistent at LFU.

    Measured: Day 10 (EOT) and Day 17 (TOC)

  17. Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the LFU Visit in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population

    Participants will be evaluated for microbiological response based on blood and urine cultures as :Eradication, including sustained microbiologic eradication, i.e., microbiologic eradication at TOC and no subsequent urine culture after TOC demonstrating recurrence of original Baseline uropathogen at ≥10^3 CFU/mL;Persistence, including microbiologic recurrence, i.e.,isolation from urine culture at ≥10^3 CFU/mL or blood culture of any of Baseline uropathogen(s) at any time after documented eradication at TOC visit up to and including LFU visit; Microbiologic indeterminate:no follow-up urine culture is available, or urine culture results are missing, or follow-up urine culture cannot be interpreted for any reason. If a participant is assessed as a microbiological persistence at EOT,participant is automatically considered persistent at TOC and LFU. If assessed as persistent at TOC, participant is automatically considered a persistent at LFU.

    Measured: At Day 28 (LFU)

  18. Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events

    An Adverse Event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal investigational/experimental) product, whether or not related to this product. Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is any AE occurring at any dose and regardless of causality that results in death, is life threatening, requires immediate or prolongation of hospitalization, results in significant disability, congenital anomaly and is a medically important reaction. TEAEs are defined as events that are newly occurring or worsening from the time of the first dose of IP through LFU.

    Measured: From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)

  19. Plasma Concentrations of TBP-PI-HBr

    Measured: 0.25 hour (h), 0.5h, 1h, 1.5h, 2h, 4h and 6h postdose at Day 2

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Sep 2023
  2. Study start21 Dec 2023
  3. Primary completion27 Jan 2025
  4. Study completion6 Feb 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
1,690 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06059846
Sponsor's protocol ID
SPR994-305
Other IDs
2023-503785-22-00, 2023
Acronym
PIVOT-PO
Status last verified
Mar 2026
First submitted
22 Sep 2023
Last updated
10 Mar 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing TBP-PI-HBr, Imipenem-cilastatin and Dummy Infusion in people with Urinary Tract Infection and Acute Pyelonephritis, run by Spero Therapeutics at 85 sites in 19 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 85 sites in Bulgaria, Argentina, Romania, Brazil, Estonia and 14 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Mar 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With Overall Response at the Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiological Intent-to-Treat (Micro-ITT) Population (time frame: At Day 17 (TOC)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Mar 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in