Esophageal CancerNCT06060106
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Versus Esophagectomy for Early Esophageal Carcinoma
An observational study of Esophageal Cancer, run by Changhai Hospital at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a minimally invasive alternative to esophagectomy for early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (EESCC), The data of EESCC patients who received ESD or esophagectomy were retrospectively analyzed,The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of ESD and… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Esophageal Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Endoscopic submucosal dissection and Esophagectomy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 191 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2011to 1 Jan 2023
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with early esophageal cancer from January 2011 to January 2021 admitted to Changhai Hospital were included in this study.Patients treated with ESD were classified as the ESD group, and those who underwent radical esophageal cancer treatment were classified as the surgical group.
Who may be able to join
- Mucosal or submucosal squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus
- no lymph node involvement or distant metastasis on computed tomography (CT) or pathology;
Who cannot join
- Tis premalignant lesions (high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia;HGIN)
- patients with neoadjuvant therapy
- patients combined with severe diseases of other organs
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Versus Esophagectomy for Early Esophageal Carcinoma:a Cohort Study
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a minimally invasive alternative to esophagectomy for early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (EESCC), The data of EESCC patients who received ESD or esophagectomy were retrospectively analyzed,The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of ESD and esophagectomy in EESCC,Risk factors affecting the prognosis of patients with early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were analyzed.
Read the detailed description
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a minimally invasive alternative to esophagectomy for early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (EESCC).The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of ESD and esophagectomy in EESCC,The data of EESCC patients who received ESD or esophagectomy were retrospectively analyzed. Overall survival (OS), disease specific survival (DSS), recurrence free survival (RFS), and procedure-related variables were compared between ESD and esophagectomy patients.Risk factors affecting the prognosis of patients with early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were analyzed.
- Conditions
- Esophageal Cancer
- Being tested
- Endoscopic submucosal dissection, Esophagectomy
- Medical subject headings
- Esophageal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Endoscopic submucosal dissectionProcedure or surgery
The patient was positioned in the left lateral decubitus position.Marking dots were made with a dual knife/hybrid knife around the lesion, and a solution of glycerin fructose with indigo carmine was injected into the submucosal layer to lift the lesion. Finally, after pre-cutting of the mucosal and submucosal layers around the lesion and dissection of the submucosa, the lesion was removed en bloc.
EsophagectomyProcedure or surgery
The main surgical methods of esophagectomy include the McKeown operation, Lvor-lewis, Sweet and minimally invasive radical resection of esophageal cancer (MIE)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Endoscopic submucosal dissection | Early esophageal cancer patients treated with ESD Receives: Procedure: Endoscopic submucosal dissection | |
| Esophagectomy | Early esophageal cancer patients treated with esophagectomy Receives: Procedure: Esophagectomy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
overall survival (OS)
OS was measured from the date of ESD or esophagectomy until death from any cause
Measured: 10 years
Disease specific survival (DSS)
DSS was measured from the date of ESD or esophagectomy until death resulting from ESCC
Measured: 10 years
Recurrence free survival (RFS)
RFS was measured from the date of ESD or esophagectomy until the first recurrence or metastasis
Measured: 10 years
Secondary outcomes (5)
postoperative complications
Major postoperative complications includes bleeding, infection, and perforation,stricture and anastomotic leakage, adverse events assessed by blood tests, imageological examination and Endoscopic evaluation. Complications were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system. The higher the complication grade, the more serious.
Measured: 30 days
R0 resection
R0 resection was defined as horizontal and vertical margins free from both cancerous and precancerous tissues (HGIN), and without evidence of LVI. Pathological assessment was performed independently by two pathologists.
Measured: 15 days
adjuvant therapy
During follow-up, record whether Adjuvant therapy (i.e., additional endoscopy/surgery, radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy) was administered.
Measured: 10 years
operation time
Time from start to finish of operation, measured in minutes
Measured: 12 hours
Post-operative hospitalization days
Date of discharge minus date of operation,measured in days
Measured: 30 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Sep 2023
- Study start1 Jan 2011
- Primary completion1 Jan 2021
- Study completion1 Jan 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Esophageal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Changhai HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 191 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Changhai Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Zhaoshen Li, Changhai Hospital
- Investigators
- Wei An, Doctor, Principal investigator, Changhai Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06060106
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- early esophageal carcinoma
- Status last verified
- Sep 2023
- First submitted
- 15 Jun 2023
- Last updated
- 29 Sep 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Zhang Y, Ding H, Chen T, Zhang X, Chen WF, Li Q, Yao L, Korrapati P, Jin XJ, Zhang YX, Xu MD, Zhou PH. Outcomes of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection vs Esophagectomy for T1 Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in a Real-World Cohort. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jan;17(1):73-81.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.04.038. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
PubMed 29704682An W, Liu MY, Zhang J, Cui YP, Gao J, Wang LP, Chen Y, Yang LX, Chen HZ, Jin H, Liu F, Chen J, Li ZS, Wang LW, Shi XG, Sun C. Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus esophagectomy for early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with tumor invasion to different depths. Am J Cancer Res. 2020 Sep 1;10(9):2977-2992. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 33042630Liu Z, Zhao R. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection vs. Surgery for Superficial Esophageal Squamous Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol. 2022 Apr 21;12:816832. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.816832. eCollection 2022.
PubMed 35530330Qian M, Feng S, Zhou H, Chen L, Wang S, Zhang K. Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus esophagectomy for t1 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis. Ther Adv Gastroenterol. 2022 Nov 21;15:17562848221138156. doi: 10.1177/17562848221138156. eCollection 2022.
PubMed 36458047
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Sep 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Versus Esophagectomy for Early Esophageal Carcinoma:a Cohort Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06060106
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- early esophageal carcinoma
- Conditions
- Esophageal Cancer
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 191 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Changhai HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2011 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jan 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a minimally invasive alternative to esophagectomy for early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (EESCC), The data of EESCC patients who received ESD or esophagectomy were retrospectively analyzed,The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of ESD and esophagectomy in EESCC,Risk factors affecting the prognosis of patients with early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were analyzed.
Detailed description
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a minimally invasive alternative to esophagectomy for early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (EESCC).The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of ESD and esophagectomy in EESCC,The data of EESCC patients who received ESD or esophagectomy were retrospectively analyzed. Overall survival (OS), disease specific survival (DSS), recurrence free survival (RFS), and procedure-related variables were compared between ESD and esophagectomy patients.Risk factors affecting the prognosis of patients with early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were analyzed.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Endoscopic submucosal dissection | – | Procedure: Endoscopic submucosal dissectionEarly esophageal cancer patients treated with ESD |
| Esophagectomy | – | Procedure: EsophagectomyEarly esophageal cancer patients treated with esophagectomy |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with early esophageal cancer from January 2011 to January 2021 admitted to Changhai Hospital were included in this study.Patients treated with ESD were classified as the ESD group, and those who underwent radical esophageal cancer treatment were classified as the surgical group.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Mucosal or submucosal squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus
- no lymph node involvement or distant metastasis on computed tomography (CT) or pathology;
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Tis premalignant lesions (high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia;HGIN)
- patients with neoadjuvant therapy
- patients combined with severe diseases of other organs
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Endoscopic submucosal dissectionThe patient was positioned in the left lateral decubitus position.Marking dots were made with a dual knife/hybrid knife around the lesion, and a solution of glycerin fructose with indigo carmine was injected into the submucosal layer to lift the lesion. Finally, after pre-cutting of the mucosal and submucosal layers around the lesion and dissection of the submucosa, the lesion was removed en bloc. | Procedure or surgery | Endoscopic submucosal dissection |
| EsophagectomyThe main surgical methods of esophagectomy include the McKeown operation, Lvor-lewis, Sweet and minimally invasive radical resection of esophageal cancer (MIE) | Procedure or surgery | Esophagectomy |
Primary outcome
overall survival (OS)
Time frame: 10 years
OS was measured from the date of ESD or esophagectomy until death from any cause
Disease specific survival (DSS)
Time frame: 10 years
DSS was measured from the date of ESD or esophagectomy until death resulting from ESCC
Recurrence free survival (RFS)
Time frame: 10 years
RFS was measured from the date of ESD or esophagectomy until the first recurrence or metastasis
5 secondary outcomes
postoperative complications
Time frame: 30 days
R0 resection
Time frame: 15 days
adjuvant therapy
Time frame: 10 years
operation time
Time frame: 12 hours
Post-operative hospitalization days
Time frame: 30 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Sep 2023.
- Background: PubMed 29704682Zhang Y, Ding H, Chen T, Zhang X, Chen WF, Li Q, Yao L, Korrapati P, Jin XJ, Zhang YX, Xu MD, Zhou PH. Outcomes of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection vs Esophagectomy for T1 Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in a Real-World Cohort. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jan;17(1):73-81.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.04.038. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
- Background: PubMed 33042630An W, Liu MY, Zhang J, Cui YP, Gao J, Wang LP, Chen Y, Yang LX, Chen HZ, Jin H, Liu F, Chen J, Li ZS, Wang LW, Shi XG, Sun C. Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus esophagectomy for early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with tumor invasion to different depths. Am J Cancer Res. 2020 Sep 1;10(9):2977-2992. eCollection 2020.
- Background: PubMed 35530330Liu Z, Zhao R. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection vs. Surgery for Superficial Esophageal Squamous Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol. 2022 Apr 21;12:816832. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.816832. eCollection 2022.
- Background: PubMed 36458047Qian M, Feng S, Zhou H, Chen L, Wang S, Zhang K. Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus esophagectomy for t1 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis. Ther Adv Gastroenterol. 2022 Nov 21;15:17562848221138156. doi: 10.1177/17562848221138156. eCollection 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Esophageal Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
Multicenter Prospective Cohort on Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Superficial Esophageal Cancer, Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Beamion BCGC-1: A Study to Find a Suitable Dose of Zongertinib Used Alone and in Combination With Other Treatments to Test Whether it Helps People With Different Types of HER2+ Cancer That Has Spread
Metastatic Breast Cancer, Metastatic Gastric Adenocarcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Wei An, Doctor principal investigator
Changhai Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Esophageal Cancer, run by Changhai Hospital at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
overall survival (OS) (time frame: 10 years). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06060106, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Sep 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.