AzTrials
AzTrials

Esophageal CancerNCT06060106

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Versus Esophagectomy for Early Esophageal Carcinoma

An observational study of Esophageal Cancer, run by Changhai Hospital at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a minimally invasive alternative to esophagectomy for early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (EESCC), The data of EESCC patients who received ESD or esophagectomy were retrospectively analyzed,The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of ESD and… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Esophageal Cancer
What is being tested?
Endoscopic submucosal dissection and Esophagectomy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
191 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Jan 2011to 1 Jan 2023
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients with early esophageal cancer from January 2011 to January 2021 admitted to Changhai Hospital were included in this study.Patients treated with ESD were classified as the ESD group, and those who underwent radical esophageal cancer treatment were classified as the surgical group.

Who may be able to join

  • Mucosal or submucosal squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus
  • no lymph node involvement or distant metastasis on computed tomography (CT) or pathology;

Who cannot join

  • Tis premalignant lesions (high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia;HGIN)
  • patients with neoadjuvant therapy
  • patients combined with severe diseases of other organs

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University

    Shanghai

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Versus Esophagectomy for Early Esophageal Carcinoma:a Cohort Study

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a minimally invasive alternative to esophagectomy for early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (EESCC), The data of EESCC patients who received ESD or esophagectomy were retrospectively analyzed,The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of ESD and esophagectomy in EESCC,Risk factors affecting the prognosis of patients with early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were analyzed.

Read the detailed description

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a minimally invasive alternative to esophagectomy for early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (EESCC).The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of ESD and esophagectomy in EESCC,The data of EESCC patients who received ESD or esophagectomy were retrospectively analyzed. Overall survival (OS), disease specific survival (DSS), recurrence free survival (RFS), and procedure-related variables were compared between ESD and esophagectomy patients.Risk factors affecting the prognosis of patients with early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were analyzed.

Being tested
Endoscopic submucosal dissection, Esophagectomy
Medical subject headings
Esophageal Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Endoscopic submucosal dissectionProcedure or surgery

    The patient was positioned in the left lateral decubitus position.Marking dots were made with a dual knife/hybrid knife around the lesion, and a solution of glycerin fructose with indigo carmine was injected into the submucosal layer to lift the lesion. Finally, after pre-cutting of the mucosal and submucosal layers around the lesion and dissection of the submucosa, the lesion was removed en bloc.

  • EsophagectomyProcedure or surgery

    The main surgical methods of esophagectomy include the McKeown operation, Lvor-lewis, Sweet and minimally invasive radical resection of esophageal cancer (MIE)

Study groups in NCT06060106
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Endoscopic submucosal dissectionEarly esophageal cancer patients treated with ESD
Receives: Procedure: Endoscopic submucosal dissection
EsophagectomyEarly esophageal cancer patients treated with esophagectomy
Receives: Procedure: Esophagectomy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. overall survival (OS)

    OS was measured from the date of ESD or esophagectomy until death from any cause

    Measured: 10 years

  2. Disease specific survival (DSS)

    DSS was measured from the date of ESD or esophagectomy until death resulting from ESCC

    Measured: 10 years

  3. Recurrence free survival (RFS)

    RFS was measured from the date of ESD or esophagectomy until the first recurrence or metastasis

    Measured: 10 years

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. postoperative complications

    Major postoperative complications includes bleeding, infection, and perforation,stricture and anastomotic leakage, adverse events assessed by blood tests, imageological examination and Endoscopic evaluation. Complications were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system. The higher the complication grade, the more serious.

    Measured: 30 days

  2. R0 resection

    R0 resection was defined as horizontal and vertical margins free from both cancerous and precancerous tissues (HGIN), and without evidence of LVI. Pathological assessment was performed independently by two pathologists.

    Measured: 15 days

  3. adjuvant therapy

    During follow-up, record whether Adjuvant therapy (i.e., additional endoscopy/surgery, radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy) was administered.

    Measured: 10 years

  4. operation time

    Time from start to finish of operation, measured in minutes

    Measured: 12 hours

  5. Post-operative hospitalization days

    Date of discharge minus date of operation,measured in days

    Measured: 30 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Sep 2023
  2. Study start1 Jan 2011
  3. Primary completion1 Jan 2021
  4. Study completion1 Jan 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
191 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06060106
Sponsor's protocol ID
early esophageal carcinoma
Status last verified
Sep 2023
First submitted
15 Jun 2023
Last updated
29 Sep 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Zhang Y, Ding H, Chen T, Zhang X, Chen WF, Li Q, Yao L, Korrapati P, Jin XJ, Zhang YX, Xu MD, Zhou PH. Outcomes of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection vs Esophagectomy for T1 Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in a Real-World Cohort. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jan;17(1):73-81.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.04.038. Epub 2018 Apr 25.

    PubMed 29704682
  • An W, Liu MY, Zhang J, Cui YP, Gao J, Wang LP, Chen Y, Yang LX, Chen HZ, Jin H, Liu F, Chen J, Li ZS, Wang LW, Shi XG, Sun C. Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus esophagectomy for early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with tumor invasion to different depths. Am J Cancer Res. 2020 Sep 1;10(9):2977-2992. eCollection 2020.

    PubMed 33042630
  • Liu Z, Zhao R. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection vs. Surgery for Superficial Esophageal Squamous Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol. 2022 Apr 21;12:816832. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.816832. eCollection 2022.

    PubMed 35530330
  • Qian M, Feng S, Zhou H, Chen L, Wang S, Zhang K. Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus esophagectomy for t1 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis. Ther Adv Gastroenterol. 2022 Nov 21;15:17562848221138156. doi: 10.1177/17562848221138156. eCollection 2022.

    PubMed 36458047

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Esophageal Cancer, run by Changhai Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

overall survival (OS) (time frame: 10 years). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06060106, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Sep 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in