AzTrials
AzTrials

OverweightPhase 2NCT06062069

A Study of CT-868 in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

A Phase 2 study testing CT-868 and CT-868 Pen Injector in people with Overweight and Obese, run by Carmot Therapeutics, Inc. at 22 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will evaluate the changes in glycemic control in overweight and obese adults with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus after receiving CT-868 for 16 weeks. The effectiveness and safety of CT-868 will be compared to placebo. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Overweight, Obese, Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
What is being tested?
CT-868 and CT-868 Pen Injector
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
111 participants
Where
22 sitesUnited States
Study dates
27 Nov 2023to 7 Jul 2025
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female, 18 years of age or older at the time of signing informed consent
  • Have a documented clinical diagnosis of T1DM greater than or equal to 1 year before the Screening Visit
  • Body mass index greater than or equal to27.0 kg/m2
  • Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level between 7.0% and 10.0%, inclusive, at the Screening Visit

Who cannot join

  • Diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) or any other types of diabetes, except T1DM
  • Experienced diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) within 3 months prior to the Screening Visit
  • Experienced severe hypoglycemia (Level 3 as defined in the ADA Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes (ADA 2022) within 3 months prior to the Screening Visit

Trial locations and contacts

22 sites in 1 country.

22 sites in 1 country

United States22 sites
  • University of North Carolina Health Sciences at MAHEC

    Asheville, North Carolina, 28803

  • Atlanta Diabetes Associates

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30309

  • University of Colorado - Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes

    Aurora, Colorado, 80045

  • Texas Diabetes and Endocrinology, P.A

    Austin, Texas, 78731

  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27517

  • John Muir Physician Network Clinical Research Center

    Concord, California, 94520

  • Velocity Clinical Research - Dallas

    Dallas, Texas, 75230

  • Research Institute of Dallas

    Dallas, Texas, 75231

  • Denver Endocrinology Diabetes and Thyroid Center

    Englewood, Colorado, 80113

  • Headlands Research- AMCR

    Escondido, California, 92025

  • MedStar Health Research Institute - Washington Hospital Center

    Hyattsville, Maryland, 20782

  • Rocky Mountain Clinical Research, LLC- Idaho Falls, Idaho

    Idaho Falls, Idaho, 83404

  • Lucas Research, Inc

    Morehead City, North Carolina, 28557

  • Advent Health

    Orlando, Florida, 32804

  • Orlando Health Science Clinic, LLC

    Orlando, Florida, 32822

  • Innovative Research Institute

    Port Charlotte, Florida, 33952

  • Oregon Health and Science University

    Portland, Oregon, 97239

  • Rainier Clinical Research Center

    Renton, Washington, 98057

  • Diabetes & Glandular Disease Clinic, P.A.

    San Antonio, Texas, 78229

  • Consano Clinical Research

    Shavano Park, Texas, 78231

  • Texas Valley Clinical Research, LLC

    Weslaco, Texas, 78596

  • Iowa Diabetes and Endocrinology Research Center

    West Des Moines, Iowa, 50266

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Phase 2, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of CT-868 Administered for 16 Weeks to Overweight and Obese Adult Participants With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

This study will evaluate the changes in glycemic control in overweight and obese adults with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus after receiving CT-868 for 16 weeks. The effectiveness and safety of CT-868 will be compared to placebo. All participants will continue with their standard diabetes care using either an insulin pump (CSII) or multiple daily injections (MDI). Alongside their designated treatment, participants will receive guidance on managing their diabetes, including monitoring blood glucose levels and diet and exercise recommendations. Treatment assignments, either CT-868 plus insulin or placebo plus insulin will be randomly determined.

Being tested
CT-868, CT-868 Pen Injector, CT-868 Pen Injector, Placebo
Medical subject headings
Overweight, Obesity, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CT-868Drug

    Also called Acmopatide, RO7795074

    CT-868 is an investigational medication administered subcutaneously via a pre-filled pen injector device.

  • CT-868 Pen InjectorDevice

    The CT-868 pen injector is a multi-dose, single-participant, disposable pen.

  • CT-868 Pen Injector, PlaceboDrug

    The placebo pen injector is identical and contains the same ingredients except for CT-868.

Study groups in NCT06062069
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CT-868 Low DoseExperimentalParticipants in this arm will receive the drug CT-868 in a subcutaneous injection form. The dosage is set at up to 1.8 mg, and it will be administered once daily for a total duration of 16 weeks.
Receives: Drug: CT-868; Device: CT-868 Pen Injector
CT-868 Medium DoseExperimentalParticipants in this arm will receive the drug CT-868 in a subcutaneous injection form. The dosage is set at up to 4.1 mg, and it will be administered once daily for a total duration of 16 weeks.
Receives: Drug: CT-868; Device: CT-868 Pen Injector
CT-868 High DoseExperimentalParticipants in this arm will receive the drug CT-868 in a subcutaneous injection form. The dosage is set at up to 6.6 mg, and it will be administered once daily for a total duration of 16 weeks.
Receives: Drug: CT-868; Device: CT-868 Pen Injector
CT-868 PlaceboPlacebo comparatorParticipants in this arm will receive a placebo designed to match the appearance and formulation of the drug CT-868. The intervention consists of a subcutaneous injection of this placebo. The placebo will be administered once daily for a duration of 16 weeks.
Receives: Device: CT-868 Pen Injector; Drug: CT-868 Pen Injector, Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) (%) at Week 16

    Baseline was defined as the last available non-missing value prior to the first dose of the randomized study drug. The analysis was based on the mixed-effect model of repeated measures (MMRM).

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 16

Secondary outcomes (43)
  1. Percent Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 16

    Baseline was defined as the last available non-missing value prior to the first dose of the randomized study drug. The analysis was based on the MMRM.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 16

  2. Change From Baseline in HbA1c (%) at Weeks 4, 8, and 12

    Baseline was defined as the last available non-missing value prior to the first dose of the randomized study drug. The analysis was based on the MMRM.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) to Weeks 4, 8, and 12

  3. Percentage of Participants Achieving HbA1c Target of <7.0% at Week 16

    Percentages have been rounded off.

    Measured: At Week 16

  4. Percentage of Participants Achieving HbA1c Target of ≤6.5% at Week 16

    Percentages have been rounded off.

    Measured: At Week 16

  5. Percentage of Participants Achieving HbA1c Target of <5.7% at Week 16

    Measured: At Week 16

  6. Change From Baseline in Total Daily Insulin Dose at Weeks 8 and 16

    Baseline was defined as the median daily insulin dose (units per day [units/day]) over a consecutive 7-day period prior to Day 1, provided that at least 4 of those 7 days had non-missing daily insulin dose data. If no such 7-day period existed within the 14-day placebo run-in period, the baseline was considered missing. The same algorithm was used for calculating values for Week 8 and 16. Total daily insulin dose was only calculated when daily bolus and daily basal are both present.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 8 and 16

  7. Change From Baseline in Basal Insulin Dose at Weeks 8 and 16

    Baseline was defined as the median daily insulin dose (units/day) over a consecutive 7-day period prior to Day 1, provided that at least 4 of those 7 days had non-missing daily insulin dose data. If no such 7-day period existed within the 14-day placebo run-in period, the baseline was considered missing. The same algorithm was used for calculating values for Week 8 and 16.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 8 and 16

  8. Change From Baseline in Bolus Insulin Dose at Weeks 8 and 16

    Baseline was defined as the median daily insulin dose (units/day) over a consecutive 7-day period prior to Day 1, provided that at least 4 of those 7 days had non-missing daily insulin dose data. If no such 7-day period existed within the 14-day placebo run-in period, the baseline was considered missing. The same algorithm was used for calculating values for Week 8 and 16.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 8 and 16

  9. Percent Change From Baseline in Total Daily Insulin Dose at Weeks 8 and 16

    Baseline total daily insulin dose was defined as the median daily insulin dose over 7 days within a 14 consecutive days period prior to Day 1, provided that at least 4 out of those 7 days had non-missing daily insulin dose data. The similar algorithm applies to Week 8 and 16. The analysis was based on the MMRM.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 8 and 16

  10. Percent Change From Baseline in Basal Insulin Dose at Weeks 8 and 16

    Baseline basal insulin dose was defined as the median daily insulin dose over 7 days within a 14 consecutive days period prior to Day 1, provided that at least 4 out of those 7 days had non-missing daily insulin dose data. The similar algorithm applies to Week 8 and 16. The analysis was based on the MMRM.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 8 and 16

  11. Percent Change From Baseline in Bolus Insulin Dose at Weeks 8 and 16

    Baseline bolus insulin dose was defined as the median daily insulin dose over 7 days within a 14 consecutive days period prior to Day 1, provided that at least 4 out of those 7 days had non-missing daily insulin dose data. The similar algorithm applies to Week 8 and 16. The analysis was based on the MMRM.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 8 and 16

  12. Percent Change From Baseline in Body Weight-adjusted Total Daily Insulin Dose at Weeks 8 and 16

    Baseline total daily insulin dose was defined as the median daily insulin dose over 7 days within a 14 consecutive days period prior to Day 1, provided that at least 4 out of those 7 days had non-missing daily insulin dose data. The similar algorithm applies to Week 8 and 16. The analysis was based on the MMRM. units/kg/day=units per kilograms per day.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 8 and 16

  13. Percent Change From Baseline in Body Weight-adjusted Basal Insulin Dose at Weeks 8 and 16

    Baseline basal insulin dose was defined as the median daily insulin dose over 7 days within a 14 consecutive days period prior to Day 1, provided that at least 4 out of those 7 days had non-missing daily insulin dose data. The similar algorithm applies to Week 8 and 16. The analysis was based on the MMRM.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 8 and 16

  14. Percent Change From Baseline in Body Weight-adjusted Bolus Insulin Dose at Weeks 8 and 16

    Baseline of bolus insulin dose was defined as the median daily insulin dose over 7 days within a 14 consecutive days period prior to Day 1, provided that at least 4 out of those 7 days had non-missing daily insulin dose data. The similar algorithm applies to Week 8 and 16. The analysis was based on the MMRM.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 8 and 16

  15. Change From Baseline in Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Intraday Mean Sensor Glucose

    All participants used a CGM device for glucose monitoring throughout the treatment. The change was assessed as: Change = Baseline CGM parameter value + HbA1c strata (< 8.5% or ≥ 8.5%) + Methods of insulin administration (pump or multiple daily injection [MDI]) + Week + Treatment + Treatment*Week (repeated values over Week 8 and 16). The analysis was based on the MMRM.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 8 and 16

  16. Change From Baseline in CGM Interday Mean Sensor Glucose

    All participants used a CGM device for glucose monitoring throughout the treatment. The change was assessed as: Change = Baseline CGM parameter value + HbA1c strata (<8.5% or ≥8.5%) + Methods of insulin administration (pump or MDI) + Week + Treatment + Treatment*Week (repeated values over Week 8 and 16). The analysis was based on the MMRM.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 8 and 16

  17. Change From Baseline in Percentage of Time Spent in Range (TIR) 70-180 mg/dL

    All participants used a CGM device for glucose monitoring throughout the treatment. TIR represents the percentage of time a participant's glucose levels stay within a target range of 70-180 mg/dL. The change was assessed as: Change = Baseline CGM parameter value + HbA1c strata (<8.5% or ≥8.5%) + Methods of insulin administration (pump or MDI) + Week + Treatment + Treatment*Week (repeated values over Week 8 and 16). The analysis was based on the MMRM.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 8 and 16

  18. Change From Baseline in Percentage of TIR 70-140 mg/dL

    All participants used a CGM device for glucose monitoring throughout the treatment. TIR represents the percentage of time a participant's glucose levels stay within a target range of 70-140 mg/dL. The change was assessed as: Change = Baseline CGM parameter value + HbA1c strata (<8.5% or ≥8.5%) + Methods of insulin administration (pump or MDI) + Week + Treatment + Treatment*Week (repeated values over Week 8 and 16). The analysis was based on the MMRM.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 8 and 16

  19. Change From Baseline in CGM Percent Time Spent in Level 1 Hypoglycemia (Time Below Target Range [TBTR, <54-70 mg/dL]) and Level 2 Hypoglycemia (Time Very Below Target Range [TVBTR <54 mg/dL])

    All participants used a CGM device for glucose monitoring throughout the treatment. TIR represents the percentage of time a participant's glucose levels stay below the target range of <54-70 mg/dL and very below the target range of <54 mg/dL. The change was assessed as: Change = Baseline CGM parameter value + HbA1c strata (<8.5% or ≥8.5%) + Methods of insulin administration (pump or MDI) + Week + Treatment + Treatment*Week (repeated values over Week 8 and 16). The analysis was based on the MMRM.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 8 and 16

  20. Change From Baseline in CGM Percent Time Spent in Level 1 Hyperglycemia (Time Above Target Range [TATR, >180-250 mg/dL]) and Level 2 Hyperglycemia (Time Very Above Target Range [TVATR >250 mg/dL])

    All participants used a CGM device for glucose monitoring throughout the treatment. TIR represents the percentage of time a participant's glucose levels stay TATR >180-250 mg/dL and TVATR >250 mg/dL. The change was assessed as: Change = Baseline CGM parameter value + HbA1c strata (<8.5% or ≥8.5%) + Methods of insulin administration (pump or MDI) + Week + Treatment + Treatment*Week (repeated values over Week 8 and 16). The analysis was based on the MMRM.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 8 and 16

  21. Event Rate With Sensor Glucose <70 mg/dL Lasting at Least 120 Minutes

    All participants used a CGM device for glucose monitoring throughout the treatment. Data is reported for event rate (number of events per person-year). Number of events with sensor glucose <70 mg/dL lasting at least 120 minutes and without gaps >30 minutes between consecutive CGM readings (event ends when glucose returns to ≥70 mg/dL for ≥15 minutes) was assessed. Percentages have been rounded off.

    Measured: Weeks 8 and 16

  22. Event Rate With Sensor Glucose >250 mg/dL Lasting at Least 120 Minutes

    All participants used a CGM device for glucose monitoring throughout the treatment. Data are reported for event rates. Event=sensor glucose >250 mg/dL lasting at least 120 minutes and without gaps >30 minutes between consecutive CGM readings (event ends when glucose returns to ≤180 mg/dL for ≥15 minutes). Percentages have been rounded off.

    Measured: Weeks 8 and 16

  23. Number of Participants With TIR 70-180 mg/dL With ≥5% Points Improvement From Baseline

    All participants used a CGM device for glucose monitoring throughout the treatment. TIR represents the percentage of time a participant's glucose levels stay within a target range of 70-180 mg/dL.

    Measured: At Weeks 8 and 16

  24. Number of Participants With TIR 70-180 mg/dL With ≥10% Points Improvement From Baseline

    All participants used a CGM device for glucose monitoring throughout the treatment. TIR represents the percentage of time a participant's glucose levels stay within a target range of 70-180 mg/dL.

    Measured: At Weeks 8 and 16

  25. Number of Participants With TIR 70-180 mg/dL for >70% of the 14-day Collection Interval Around the Week 8 Visit and the 14-day Interval Prior to the Week 16 Visit

    All participants used a CGM device for glucose monitoring throughout the treatment. TIR represents the percentage of time a participant's glucose levels stay within a target range of 70-180 mg/dL.

    Measured: At Weeks 8 and 16

  26. Number of Participants With Time Below Range (TBR) <70 mg/dL for <4% of Each Day

    All participants used a CGM device for glucose monitoring throughout the treatment.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 8 and 16

  27. Number of Participants With TBR <54 mg/dL for <1% of Each Day

    All participants used a CGM device for glucose monitoring throughout the treatment.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 8 and 16

  28. Number of Participants With Time Above Range (TAR) >180 mg/dL for <25% of Each Day

    All participants used a CGM device for glucose monitoring throughout the treatment.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 8 and 16

  29. Number of Participants With TAR >250 mg/dL for <5% of Each Day

    All participants used a CGM device for glucose monitoring throughout the treatment.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 8 and 16

  30. Number of Participants With TBR <70 mg/dL for <4% Over the 14-day Collection Window

    All participants used a CGM device for glucose monitoring throughout the treatment.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 8 and 16

  31. Number of Participants With TBR <54 mg/dL for <1% Over the 14-day Collection Window

    All participants used a CGM device for glucose monitoring throughout the treatment.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 8 and 16

  32. Number of Participants With TAR >180 mg/dL for <25% Over the 14-day Collection Window

    All participants used a CGM device for glucose monitoring throughout the treatment.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 8 and 16

  33. Number of Participants With TAR >250 mg/dL for <5% Over the 14-day Collection Window

    All participants used a CGM device for glucose monitoring throughout the treatment.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 8 and 16

  34. Percent Change From Baseline in the Glycemic Risk Index

    All participants used a CGM device for glucose monitoring throughout the treatment.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 8 and 16

  35. Percent Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Day 1 to Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), and Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

  36. Absolute Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Day 1 to Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), and Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

  37. Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥5%, ≥10%, ≥15%, and ≥20% Weight Loss at Week 16

    Measured: At Week 16

  38. Percentage of Participants Experiencing 1 or More Level 1, 2, or 3 Hypoglycemia Events (Worst Severity)

    Level 1 hypoglycemia: glucose between <70-54 mg/dL; Level 2 hypoglycemia: glucose level between <54 mg/dL; Level 3 hypoglycemia: These episodes may be associated with sufficient neuroglycopenia to induce seizure or coma.

    Measured: Postbaseline from Day 1 to Week 16

  39. Event Rate of Level 2 Hypoglycemia Over the 2-Week Baseline Period and the 16-Week Treatment Period

    The baseline period event rate was calculated as (the total number of events) / (14/365.25 * number of patients). Baseline hypoglycemia events occurred within 14 days prior to first treatment start time (Day 1). The treatment period event rate was calculated as (the total number of events) / (sum of the person-time exposed to the study drug after randomization (in years)). Sum of the person-time exposed to the study drug after randomization is calculated as the time from first to last dose of study drug for all participants in the respective treatment arm.

    Measured: Baseline Period (14 days before Day 1) and Treatment Period (up to 16 weeks)

  40. Number of Participants With Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA) Events

    DKA episode was defined as the presence of acidosis (blood pH <7.3, serum bicarbonate levels <18 milliequivalents per liter [mEq/L]), and accompanied by symptoms/signs per the anti-drug antibody (ADA) consensus statement on diagnosis of DKA or if the DKA episode results in a hospital or emergency room stay.

    Measured: Up to Week 18

  41. Participants With DKA Events That Led to Hospitalization or Emergency Room Visits During the Study

    DKA episode was defined as the presence of acidosis (blood pH <7.3, serum bicarbonate levels <18 mEq/L), and accompanied by symptoms/signs per the ADA consensus statement on diagnosis of DKA or if the DKA episode results in a hospital or emergency room stay.

    Measured: Up to Week 18

  42. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Adverse Device Effects (ADEs) Over the Period of 16 Weeks

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, regardless of causal attribution. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An ADE was defined as an AE related to the medical device; in this study, the medical device is the pen device with which the study drug is administered. This included any event that was the result of incomplete user manual information or of incorrect use of the medical device.

    Measured: Up to 16 weeks

  43. Plasma Drug Concentrations of CT-868 at the Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 16 Visits

    Measured: At 24 hours post-dose on Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 16

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Oct 2023
  2. Study start27 Nov 2023
  3. Primary completion7 Jul 2025
  4. Study completion7 Jul 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
111 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06062069
Sponsor's protocol ID
CT-868-004
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
14 Sep 2023
Last updated
28 Oct 2026
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing CT-868 and CT-868 Pen Injector in people with Overweight and Obese, run by Carmot Therapeutics, Inc. at 22 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 22 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Oct 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) (%) at Week 16 (time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 16). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Oct 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in