AzTrials
AzTrials

Adult Patients Who Declare an Allergy to Penicillin During Anaesthetic Consultation Without Any Allergy Work up That Could Confirm This DeclarationPROPHYLALNCT06067919

Assessment of the Applicability and Acceptability of an Algorithm to Guide the Prescription of 1st and 2nd Generation Cephalosporins as Part of Intraoperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Patients With a Declared Allergy to Penicillin

A study testing decision tree for the choice of intraoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in people with Adult Patients Who Declare an Allergy to Penicillin During Anaesthetic Consultation Without Any Allergy Work up That Could Confirm This Declaration and Good Comprehension of French Language, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), a surgical site infection (SSI) is an infection that occurs after surgery at the site where the surgery was performed. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
decision tree for the choice of intraoperative antibiotic prophylaxis
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
275 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
9 Oct 2023to 20 May 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age >= 18 years;
  • Patients with a good French understanding
  • Who declare themselves allergic to penicillin and who have not benefit from an allergy work-up to explore their allergies and possible therapeutic alternatives;
  • Requiring antibiotic prophylaxis with either first or second generation cephalosporins for elective or emergency surgery.

Who cannot join

  • Refusal to sign informed consent
  • Patient under legal protection ;
  • Pregnant women;
  • Patient scheduled for surgery requiring first-line antibiotic prophylaxis with an agent other than first and second generation cephalosporins (such as amoxicillin/clavulanate or vancomycin) according to the recommendations of the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (SFAR) in one of the investigating centres;
  • Patient declaring an allergy to antibiotics other than penicillins.
  • Not affiliated to a social security scheme

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Bichat hospital

    Paris

Other trials in France

About this study

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), a surgical site infection (SSI) is an infection that occurs after surgery at the site where the surgery was performed. The prevalence of SSIs is difficult to obtain and is probably underestimated, as many SSIs occur after the patient has been discharged from hospital and are not taken into account. SSIs are responsible for an increase in length of stay, mortality and costs. Their prevention is therefore essential in the operating theater, and has been the subject of recommendations recently updated by the CDC. The first line of prevention is the administration of prophylaxis antibiotic adapted to the surgical procedure, administered within a specific timeframe in order to achieve an effective bactericidal concentration in the tissues at the time of the surgical incision. In France, in the United States and for the WHO, the recommended first line of antibiotic prophylaxis is most often an agent from the beta-lactam family, a penicillin or a cephalosporin, with the exception of ophthalmological surgery. No strategy is described for the management of patients with a reported allergy to penicillin, apart from the recommendation of therapeutic alternatives.

The use of a decision-making strategy in the operating theater for patients with a reported allergy to penicillin therefore appears necessary and is recommended by experts. In the intraoperative context, the application of a strategy would make it possible to guide the use of cephalosporins, without removing the "penicillin allergy" label from the patient, but by proposing an alternative via the use of a cephalosporin depending on the probability of the risk of a real allergy to penicillin, according to the description of the former reaction.

Read the detailed description

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), a surgical site infection (SSI) is an infection that occurs after surgery at the site where the surgery was performed. The prevalence of SSIs is difficult to obtain and is probably underestimated, as many SSIs occur after the patient has been discharged from hospital and are not taken into account. SSIs are responsible for an increase in length of stay, mortality and costs. Their prevention is therefore essential in the operating theater, and has been the subject of recommendations recently updated by the CDC. The first line of prevention is the administration of prophylaxis antibiotic adapted to the surgical procedure, administered within a specific timeframe in order to achieve an effective bactericidal concentration in the tissues at the time of the surgical incision. In France, in the United States and for the WHO, the recommended first line of antibiotic prophylaxis is most often an agent from the beta-lactam family, a penicillin or a cephalosporin, with the exception of ophthalmological surgery. No strategy is described for the management of patients with a reported allergy to penicillin, apart from the recommendation of therapeutic alternatives.

The use of a decision-making strategy in the operating theater for patients with a reported allergy to penicillin therefore appears necessary and is recommended by experts. In the intraoperative context, the application of a strategy would make it possible to guide the use of cephalosporins, without removing the "penicillin allergy" label from the patient, but by proposing an alternative via the use of a cephalosporin depending on the probability of the risk of a real allergy to penicillin, according to the description of the former reaction.

The main objective is to assess the impact on first and second generation cephalosporins prescription rate of a decision tree designed to guide the prescription of first and second generation cephalosporins in patients with a self-reported allergy to penicillin.

Being tested
decision tree for the choice of intraoperative antibiotic prophylaxis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • decision tree for the choice of intraoperative antibiotic prophylaxisOther

    Presentation of a decision tree to anaesthetists to guide the choice of intraoperative antibiotic prophylaxis

Study groups in NCT06067919
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
usual careNo interventionNot described
use of a decision tree to guide antibiotic prophylaxis prescriptionExperimentalNot described
Receives: Other: decision tree for the choice of intraoperative antibiotic prophylaxis

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. prescription of 1st generation cephalosporins

    Rate of prescription of 1st cephalosporins for intraoperative antibiotic prophylaxis.

    Measured: surgery day

  2. prescription of 2nd generation cephalosporins

    Rate of prescription of 2nd generation cephalosporins for intraoperative antibiotic prophylaxis.

    Measured: surgery day

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. surgical site infections (SSI)

    number of surgical site infections (SSI)

    Measured: 30 days after surgery

  2. new surgery due to surgical site infections (SSI)

    number of new surgery due to SSI

    Measured: 30 days after surgery

  3. intraoperative hypersensitivity reactions attributable to antibiotic prophylaxis

    Number of intraoperative hypersensitivity reactions attributable to antibiotic prophylaxis

    Measured: surgery day

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Oct 2023
  2. Study start9 Oct 2023
  3. Primary completion30 Dec 2024
  4. Study completion20 May 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Sequential
Model description
assess the impact of disseminating of a decision tree on prescribing practices, a cluster randomised, stepped-wedge, multicentre, national, interventional, pragmatic and open study will be carried out.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
275 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06067919
Sponsor's protocol ID
APHP220837
Acronym
PROPHYLAL
Status last verified
May 2025
First submitted
28 Sep 2023
Last updated
24 Aug 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing decision tree for the choice of intraoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in people with Adult Patients Who Declare an Allergy to Penicillin During Anaesthetic Consultation Without Any Allergy Work up That Could Confirm This Declaration and Good Comprehension of French Language, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

prescription of 1st generation cephalosporins (time frame: surgery day). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Aug 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in