AzTrials
AzTrials

Hip OsteoarthritisNCT06070220

The Effectiveness of Client-Centered Intervention inTotal Hip Arthroplasty

A study testing traditional occupational therapy intervention and client-centered intervention and Traditional occupational therapy intervention in people with Hip Osteoarthritis, run by Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The current study was conducted to effectiveness of the Client-centered (CC) intervention after Total Hip Arthroplasty (TKA). The current study was planned to examine the impact of the CC intervention on quality of life, perceived occupational performance and satisfaction. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Hip Osteoarthritis
What is being tested?
traditional occupational therapy intervention and client-centered intervention and Traditional occupational therapy intervention
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
36 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
1 Jul 2022to 1 Jul 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • (1) Being 65 years of age or older,
  • (2) Mini Mental State Examination score of ≥ 24,
  • (3) having undergone unilateral total hip replacement,
  • (4) education level of at least completion of elementary school,
  • (5) ability to understand and follow verbal instructions,
  • (6) volunteer to participate in the study

Who cannot join

  • (1) revision surgery,
  • (2) having any chronic disease that will affect the rehabilitation process,
  • (3) auditory and visual problems that may affect rehabilitation implementation and communication,
  • (4) postoperative complications (e.g. nerve injury and deep vein thrombosis), and
  • (5) attendance of any rehabilitation program (physiotherapy, speech therapy, psychotherapy, etc.) before and during the study period

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Lokman Hekim University

    Ankara

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: The Effectiveness of Client-Centered Intervention on Quality of Life and Perceived Occupational Performance and Satisfaction After Total Hip Arthroplasty-A Single Blind Randomized Controlled Study

The current study was conducted to effectiveness of the Client-centered (CC) intervention after Total Hip Arthroplasty (TKA). The current study was planned to examine the impact of the CC intervention on quality of life, perceived occupational performance and satisfaction. The current study was designed according to the CONSORT statement, which provides a standardized method for randomized controlled trial (RCT) design. Approval for the study was granted by the Local Ethics Committee. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to the study.

Read the detailed description

This study was designed to examine the effectiveness of 6-week CC intervention on quality of life and perceived occupational performance and satisfaction level in individuals aged 65 and over after THA. The study has a randomized controlled structure planned according to the CONSORT Statement. Approval for the study was granted by the Local Ethics Committee. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to the study.

Participants To determine the number of samples, a power analysis, detailed in the statistical analysis section, was performed and it was determined that there should be at least 16 participants for each group. The study evaluated 41 older adults, considering the inclusion and exclusion criteria, as well as predicting participants who would drop out of the study for any reason during the intervention process. These 41 participants who were admitted to a public university's occupational therapy department between July 2022 and July 2023 were screened.

According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, one participant from each group was excluded from the study because they participated in another rehabilitation program. The remaining 39 participants were randomly assigned to either the CC group or the control group using a computer-generated randomization technique. Initial evaluations were made of the participants, who were divided into 20 participants in the CC group and 19 participants in the control group. Afterwards, during the intervention process, 2 participants from the CC group and 1 from the control group were excluded from the study because they could not participate regularly.

Measurement The demographic characteristics of the participants were recorded, including age, sex, education level, body mass index, smoking/alcohol use, operation region. On the other hand, the following scales were used for all participants, both for use in the inclusion criteria and to measure quality of life and perceived occupational performance and satisfaction.

The scale used in the inclusion criteria:

Mini Mental State Examination In the inclusion criteria, Mini Mental State Examination used to determine cognitive status consists of a maximum of 30 points. 24 points is considered the threshold value, and scores of 24 and above indicate good cognitive skills. Turkish validity and reliability studies of the test have been conducted and the researcher found the Mini Mental State Examination positive and negative predictive values .90 and .95 respectively and kappa score .86.

Scales used in the current study:

Nottingham Health Profile Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) is a 38-item quality of life survey that measures individuals' perceived health problems and the extent to which these health problems affect ADLs.

Canadian Occupational Performance Measure The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) was used to identify occupations where participants had problems with ADLs and to determine the perceived occupational performance and satisfaction level in these occupations. In the COPM, which was designed with the semi-structured interview method, firstly, the occupations in which the participants experience problems in the areas of self-care, productivity and free time are determined by giving importance points with a 1-10 Likert type scoring system. Afterwards, a maximum of 5 occupations with the highest importance are determined and the participants give performance and satisfaction scores to these occupations using a 1-10 Likert type scoring method. The performance and satisfaction points given for each occupation are summed and the performance and satisfaction points are divided by the number of occupations received. As a result, participants' perceived occupational performance and satisfaction scores are obtained. The Turkish adaptation performed and test re-test reliability of Turkish version of COPM performance was .988 and satisfaction .986, indicating excellent reliability.

Intervention

This program, which was created before discharge and applied to both groups, was created using the literature. The following training procedure, which included exercise, transfer activities and home arrangements, was followed in common in both groups:

  1. st day: After the operation, exercises to strengthen the muscles of the participants (thigh, hip and trunk muscles) were explained verbally and visually. Each exercise consists of 3 sets of 12 repetitions. Exercises were updated in bed, sitting or standing, depending on the participant's functional status, pain and fatigue. Additionally, transfer activities training was provided: Transfer Activities Training Considering the needs of the participants, a transfer activities training program was created using the literature. This training program teaches participants how to transfer on wet floors such as toilets and bathrooms, and from one room to another, to beds, chairs, wheelchairs and sofas. Additionally, how to go up and down stairs in a healthy way is explained.
  2. nd day: The exercises taught to the participants on the first day were repeated. Following these exercises, participants were given verbal instructions on gait training, and then gait training began. According to the pain and fatigue status of the participants, gait exercises were continued.
  3. rd day: The work done on the first and second day was repeated. Pre-discharge home arrangements training was provided:

Home arrangements training Home arrangements training was provided in order to eliminate problems in areas of the house that are difficult to move and may cause injuries such as living room, bathroom, toilet, kitchen, bedroom, corridor, stairs and to perform daily living activities more independently. In this training home injuries and causes of falls, changes that can be made at home, the use of assistive technology, the use of the right adaptive equipment are explained. Home arrangement training to increase mobilization and prevent various injuries such as the use of grab bars, arranging furniture, using adequate lighting (such as using a photocell lamp in the hallway or increasing the light intensity), how to prevent slipping on a wet floor, lifting door sills, moving carpets and cables, using ramps, rearranging seats/chairs/beds to facilitate the transfer process information.

In addition, each participant was given a home visit after discharge and home arrangements were made.

Client-centered intervention The CC intervention was planned to consist of 45-minute sessions 3 days a week for 6 weeks, after the first 4-day rehabilitation procedure given jointly both group.

CC intervention is a dynamic approach that involves a systematic therapy process, that is, in which the participant and the therapist are active in the treatment process. In the current study, a treatment program was designed over a maximum of 5 occupations in which participants evaluated after THA indicated problems in activities of daily living according to COPM. This systematic and dynamic program consists of 4 phases: (1) client-centered goal setting, (2) negotiating an intervention plan, (3) the actual intervention, (4) an evaluation of the outcome and finally reporting to relevant others. A key factor in implementing this intervention program is the problems and priorities prioritized for the participant. The details of the intervention program are described below:

  1. st stage: Occupations that cause performance problems in ADLs living should be identified. Realistic and achievable goals for these problems should be designed. In addition, it should be determined how these occupations are affected after THA.
  2. nd stage: Brainstorming should be done for possible solutions to the problems experienced in the occupations specified by the participants. Then the pros and cons of the identified solutions should be evaluated.
  3. rd stage: Once participants have decided on possible solutions, a plan should be made and action taken. Adaptation of the occupation determined by COPM in terms of time, place, person, how it is done, and the steps of the occupation (in accordance with priority).
  4. th stage: The participant should be informed about the progress of the CC intervention and the participant's experiences. If necessary, the intervention should be updated by consensus with the participant.

Statistical Analysis Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software (SPSS v. 28, IBM Corporation, New York, NY, USA) was used for all statistical analyses. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05 and the data are represented as mean±standart deviation. To compare quality of life and occupational performance, an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was performed using pre-test values as covariates and post-test values as dependent variables. Before analyzing data, all assumptions of ANCOVA, including normality, homogeneity, homogeneity of regression slopes, and linearity were checked and met. Partial et squared was calculated to assess the effect size, following Cohen's classification where 0.01 represents a small effect, 0.06 stands for a medium effect, and 0.14 indicates a large effect.

Being tested
traditional occupational therapy intervention and client-centered intervention, Traditional occupational therapy intervention
Keywords
Client-centered, Quality of life, Occupational performance, Hip arthroplasty
Medical subject headings
Osteoarthritis, Hip

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • traditional occupational therapy intervention and client-centered interventionBehavioural

    Traditional occupational therapy intervention and client centered intervention were given to the participants.

    CC intervention is a dynamic approach that involves a systematic therapy process, that is, in which the participant and the therapist are active in the treatment process. In the current study, a treatment program was designed over a maximum of 5 occupations in which participants evaluated after THA indicated problems in activities of daily living according to COPM. This systematic and dynamic program consists of 4 phases: (1) client-centered goal setting, (2) negotiating an intervention plan, (3) the actual intervention, (4) an evaluation of the outcome and finally reporting to relevant others.

  • Traditional occupational therapy interventionBehavioural

    The following training procedure, which included exercise, transfer activities and home arrangements, was followed in common in both groups:

    1. st day: After the operation, exercises to strengthen the muscles of the participants (thigh, hip and trunk muscles) were explained verbally and visually. Each exercise consists of 3 sets of 12 repetitions. Exercises were updated in bed, sitting or standing, depending on the participant's functional status, pain and fatigue. Additionally, transfer activities training was provided.
    2. nd day: The exercises taught to the participants on the first day were repeated. Following these exercises, participants were given verbal instructions on gait training, and then gait training began. According to the pain and fatigue status of the participants, gait exercises were continued.
    3. rd day: The work done on the first and second day was repeated. Pre-discharge home arrangements training was provided.
Study groups in NCT06070220
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
client-centered intervention groupExperimentalNot described
Receives: Behavioral: traditional occupational therapy intervention and client-centered intervention
control groupExperimentalNot described
Receives: Behavioral: Traditional occupational therapy intervention

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure

    The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) was used to identify occupations where participants had problems with ADLs and to determine the perceived occupational performance and satisfaction level in these occupations. In the COPM, which was designed with the semi-structured interview method, firstly, the occupations in which the participants experience problems in the areas of self-care, productivity and free time are determined by giving importance points with a 1-10 Likert type scoring system. The higher the score, the higher the performance and satisfaction level.

    Measured: 40 minutes

  2. Nottingham Health Profile

    Nottingham Health Profile Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) is a 38-item quality of life survey that measures individuals' perceived health problems and the extent to which these health problems affect ADLs. It consists of 6 sub-dimensions and each sub-dimension consists of 0-100 points (0 points indicate good health status-100 points indicate poor health status): energy (3 items), pain (8 items), emotional reactions (9 items), sleep (5 items), social isolation (5 items), and physical activity (8 items). The Turkish version of the NHP was used to evaluate the health-related quality of life.

    Measured: 10 minutes

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Oct 2023
  2. Study start1 Jul 2022
  3. Primary completion1 Jul 2023
  4. Study completion1 Jul 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
36 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06070220
Sponsor's protocol ID
E-53875521
Status last verified
Oct 2023
First submitted
30 Sep 2023
Last updated
18 Oct 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing traditional occupational therapy intervention and client-centered intervention and Traditional occupational therapy intervention in people with Hip Osteoarthritis, run by Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Oct 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (time frame: 40 minutes). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Oct 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in