AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Subdural HematomaNEBULANCT06072053

YL-1 Needle Puncture vs BHC With Postoperative Exhaustive Drainage for CSDH

An observational study of Chronic Subdural Hematoma, run by Beijing Tiantan Hospital at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A prospective multicenter cohort study was designed to compare the differences in complications with YL-1 Needle Puncture versus Bulr-hole Craniotomy (BHC) with postoperative Exhaustive Drainage strategy for patients with Chronic Subdural Hematoma. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 years
Conditions the study is for
Chronic Subdural Hematoma
What is being tested?
Burr Hole Craniostomy and Postoperative Exhaustive Drainage Strategy and YL-1 puncture needle and Postoperative Exhaustive Drainage Strategy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
460 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
22 Dec 2023to 1 May 2025
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients with CSDH recruited from the neurosurgery departments of 12 medical centers in China who had significant clinical symptoms confirmed by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Six medical centers each used BHC as well as YL-1 puncture needles for comparison.

Who may be able to join

  • Adults, male or female, 18 years ≤ age ≤ 90 years;
  • Preoperative neurological dysfunction, such as headache and dizziness, nausea and vomiting, limb numbness or weakness, unsteady walking, limb twitching, confusion, aphasia, slow response, memory loss, etc;
  • A definite diagnosis of chronic subdural hematoma by CT or MRI;
  • Signed informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • No symptoms before surgery and no obvious impact on oneself's normal life;
  • Lack of mass effect, less than 0.5 cm of midline structure shift, and no need surgery judged clinically by neurosurgeons;
  • Previous surgery for chronic subdural hematoma during the past 6 months;
  • Previous intracranial surgery for any neurological disorders but chronic subdural hematoma before
  • Existing poor medication condition or severe comorbidity so that surgery cannot be tolerated or follow-up cannot be completed
  • Combination of major systemic diseases that are expected to interfere with study implementation and follow-up observations;
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Definite coagulation abnormalities with a high risk of bleeding (presence of one of the following three: prolongation of the prothrombin time PT or the activated partial thromboplastin time APTT by more than 10 seconds, an international normalized ratio INR greater than 3.0, and an absolute platelet value of less than 100 × 109/L);
  • Postoperative cooperation is suspected to be insufficient for follow-up for 6 months;
  • Reproductive-age women without verified negative pregnancy testing;
  • Participating in other research

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Weiming Liu, M.D. contact

13701182770

liuweimingnsok@sina.com

Liang Wu, M.D. contact

15001333582

jasewl@sina.com

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100070

    Weiming Liu, MD, 13701182770 ext. +86, liuweimingnsok@sina.com

    Weiming Liu, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: YL-1 Needle Puncture Versus Burr-hole Craniotomy With Postoperative Exhaustive Drainage for Chronic Subdural Hematoma: a Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study

A prospective multicenter cohort study was designed to compare the differences in complications with YL-1 Needle Puncture versus Bulr-hole Craniotomy (BHC) with postoperative Exhaustive Drainage strategy for patients with Chronic Subdural Hematoma.

Read the detailed description

Chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH) is a common condition in neurosurgery. It is generally considered to be a closed exudate formed by blood or blood degradation products between the dura mater and the arachnoid membrane. Its local occupying effect will compress the neighbouring brain tissues, leading to varying degrees of neurological dysfunction. In severe cases, it can lead to cerebral hernia and endanger the patient's life. Currently, the most commonly used surgical method for the treatment of chronic subdural haematoma is BHC, but many studies have found that various complications may occur after BHC. With the rapid development of neurosurgical microtechnology, Twist Drill Craniotomy (TDC) was proposed. YL-1 puncture needle technique, as a modified solution of TDC, has a short surgical time and is less traumatic to patients. In the treatment of chronic subdural haematomas, investigator's team has adopted the strategy of postoperative instillation of urokinase and adequate drainage of the haematoma. Based on this, this study intends to conduct a multicentre prospective observational cohort study of the above two treatment in order to scientifically and rigorously derive the optimal clinical treatment strategy for chronic subdural haematoma.

Being tested
Burr Hole Craniostomy and Postoperative Exhaustive Drainage Strategy, YL-1 puncture needle and Postoperative Exhaustive Drainage Strategy
Keywords
Chronic Subdural Hematoma, YL-1 Needle Drainage, Burr Hole Craniostomy, Exhaustive drainage strategy
Medical subject headings
Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Burr Hole Craniostomy and Postoperative Exhaustive Drainage StrategyProcedure or surgery

    According to the preoperative CT results, drilling and drainage was performed at the thickest level of the hematoma; during the operation, the hematoma cavity was adequately flushed with saline and a drainage tube was left in the hematoma cavity; after the operation, the hematoma cavity was flushed with urokinase, and the drainage tube was removed after adequate drainage.

  • YL-1 puncture needle and Postoperative Exhaustive Drainage StrategyProcedure or surgery

    Based on preoperative CT, the thickest level of the hematoma was selected and localized. During the operation, an electric drilling needle was used to rapidly break through the skull and dura to enter the cavity of the subdural hematoma, and the puncture needle was fixed to the skull to drain the subdural hematoma. After the operation, the hematoma cavity was flushed with urokinase, and the drainage tube was removed after adequate drainage.

Study groups in NCT06072053
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
BHC groupPatients with CSDH recruited from the neurosurgery departments of 6 medical centers in China who had clinically significant symptoms confirmed by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging and ultimately treated with Bulr-hole Craniotomy.
Receives: Procedure: Burr Hole Craniostomy and Postoperative Exhaustive Drainage Strategy
YL-1 Needle Puncture groupPatients with CSDH recruited from the neurosurgery departments of 6 medical centers in China who had clinically significant symptoms confirmed by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging and ultimately treated with YL-1 needle puncture.
Receives: Procedure: YL-1 puncture needle and Postoperative Exhaustive Drainage Strategy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Complication rates

    To compare the difference in overall complication rates between the two groups of CSDH patients treated with YL-1 perforator needles and drilled drainage at 3 months postoperatively.

    Measured: From operation up to 3 months postoperatively

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Recurrence rate

    To compare the difference in recurrence rate at 3 months postoperatively between the two groups;

    Measured: From operation up to 3 months postoperatively

  2. Mortality rate

    To compare the difference in mortality rate at 3 months postoperatively between the two groups;

    Measured: From operation up to 3 months postoperatively

  3. Change of Modified Rankin Scale (MRS) between groups from baseline to 3 months after operation

    Modified Rankin Scale ranges from score 1 to 6, and higher scores mean a worse clinical outcome, where score 1 indicates normal daily functionality and score 6 indicates death.

    Measured: At baseline and at 3 months after operation

  4. Quality of life assessment (EQ-5D-5L)

    A standardized instrument, EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire, will be used as a generic measure of health related quality of life. The questionnaire contains 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension rates across five levels, including 'No problems-Slight problems-Moderate problems-Severe problems-Unable to'postoperatively between the two groups.

    Measured: At baseline and at 3 months after operation

  5. Change of Markwalder Grading Scale between groups from baseline to 3 months after operation

    Markwalder Grading Scale ranges from grade 0 to 4, and higher scores mean a worse neurological outcome, where grade 0 indicates normal neurological function and grade 4 indicates coma.

    Measured: At baseline and at 3 months after operation

  6. Hospitalization costs

    To compare the difference in hospitalization costs between the two groups.

    Measured: At baseline.

  7. Length of hospitalization

    To compare the difference in length of hospitalization between the two groups;

    Measured: At baseline.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Oct 2023
  2. Study start22 Dec 2023
  3. Primary completion1 Jan 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 May 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
460 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06072053
Sponsor's protocol ID
HX-B-2023035
Acronym
NEBULA
Status last verified
Dec 2023
First submitted
1 Oct 2023
Last updated
27 Dec 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Almenawer SA, Farrokhyar F, Hong C, Alhazzani W, Manoranjan B, Yarascavitch B, Arjmand P, Baronia B, Reddy K, Murty N, Singh S. Chronic subdural hematoma management: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 34,829 patients. Ann Surg. 2014 Mar;259(3):449-57. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000255.

    PubMed 24096761
  • Brennan PM, Kolias AG, Joannides AJ, Shapey J, Marcus HJ, Gregson BA, Grover PJ, Hutchinson PJ, Coulter IC; British Neurosurgical Trainee Research Collaborative. The management and outcome for patients with chronic subdural hematoma: a prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study in the United Kingdom. J Neurosurg. 2017 Mar 17:1-8. doi: 10.3171/2016.8.JNS16134.test. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 28306417
  • Duerinck J, Van Der Veken J, Schuind S, Van Calenbergh F, van Loon J, Du Four S, Debacker S, Costa E, Raftopoulos C, De Witte O, Cools W, Buyl R, Van Velthoven V, D'Haens J, Bruneau M. Randomized Trial Comparing Burr Hole Craniostomy, Minicraniotomy, and Twist Drill Craniostomy for Treatment of Chronic Subdural Hematoma. Neurosurgery. 2022 Aug 1;91(2):304-311. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000001997. Epub 2022 May 24.

    PubMed 35593710
  • Kolias AG, Chari A, Santarius T, Hutchinson PJ. Chronic subdural haematoma: modern management and emerging therapies. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014 Oct;10(10):570-8. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2014.163. Epub 2014 Sep 16.

    PubMed 25224156
  • Lee SJ, Hwang SC, Im SB. Twist-Drill or Burr Hole Craniostomy for Draining Chronic Subdural Hematomas: How to Choose It for Chronic Subdural Hematoma Drainage. Korean J Neurotrauma. 2016 Oct;12(2):107-111. doi: 10.13004/kjnt.2016.12.2.107. Epub 2016 Oct 31.

    PubMed 27857917

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Chronic Subdural Hematoma, run by Beijing Tiantan Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Dec 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Weiming Liu, M.D. (13701182770, liuweimingnsok@sina.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Complication rates (time frame: From operation up to 3 months postoperatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06072053, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Dec 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in