HealthyNCT06074523
Psychometric Testing: Cued vs. Learned Suppression
A study testing Behavioral Measurement and self-report in people with Healthy, run by Lehigh University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
In this line of research, the researchers are examining whether performance on a cued attentional suppression (ignoring) task is related to performance on a learned attentional suppression task. In addition, these measures are related to the capacity of working memory and every day inattentive traits. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Healthy
- What is being tested?
- Behavioral Measurement and self-report
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 75 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 2 Nov 2022to 10 Mar 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Normal or corrected-to-normal visual acuity, normal color vision
Who cannot join
- age
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
In this line of research, the researchers are examining whether performance on a cued attentional suppression (ignoring) task is related to performance on a learned attentional suppression task. In addition, these measures are related to the capacity of working memory and every day inattentive traits.
Read the detailed description
This is a behavioral study. The researchers will measures performance on multiple tasks. 1) a cued attentional suppression task, where participants are told the color of the item they are supposed to ignore on each trial. 2) a learned attentional suppression task, where participants learn over experience that a particular color is not the target. 3) a visual working memory capacity measurement 4) an inattentive trait report task, where participants report their experiences of inattention during their daily lives.
- Conditions
- Healthy
- Being tested
- Behavioral Measurement and self-report
- Keywords
- attention
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Behavioral Measurement and self-reportBehavioural
Measurements of behavioral performance and self-report
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Attention and Working Memory Tests | Experimental | All participants will complete a series of behavioral tasks, including cued visual search with positive (target color), negative (distractor color) and neutral (baseline) cues, learned visual search with a repeated salient distractor color, a visual working memory capacity task, and a daily life inattentive traits questionnaire (self-report). Single Arm. Receives: Behavioral: Behavioral Measurement and self-report |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Button Press Reaction Time
Reaction times on visual search task with positive, negative, and neutral cues
Measured: 1 day
Learned Suppression Task
Reaction times on visual search task no salient distractor and learned salient distractor
Measured: 1 day
Visual Working Memory Capacity
Visual Working Memory Capacity- Change Localization; Estimate of number of items maintained in working memory
Measured: 1 day
Inattentive Traits Subscale of Adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Self Report Scale
Adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Self Report Scale (used on healthy adults), Inattentive Traits subscale. Higher values indicate more ADHD-like inattentive trait symptoms (0-45).
Measured: 1 day
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Oct 2023
- Study start2 Nov 2022
- Primary completion10 Mar 2023
- Study completion10 Mar 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HealthyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Within-subjects measures, correlational analysis
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Lehigh University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Nancy Carlisle, PhD, Principal investigator, Lehigh University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06074523
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 9R15EY030247-01A1
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 3 Oct 2023
- Last updated
- 12 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Anonymous behavioral performance data will be available for other researchers upon request
Publications
Arita JT, Carlisle NB, Woodman GF. Templates for rejection: configuring attention to ignore task-irrelevant features. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Jun;38(3):580-4. doi: 10.1037/a0027885. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
PubMed 22468723
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Psychometric Testing: Cued vs. Learned Suppression
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06074523
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 9R15EY030247-01A1
- Conditions
- Healthy
- Keywords
- attention
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Lehigh UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 2 Nov 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Mar 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Mar 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 19 Nov 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In this line of research, the researchers are examining whether performance on a cued attentional suppression (ignoring) task is related to performance on a learned attentional suppression task. In addition, these measures are related to the capacity of working memory and every day inattentive traits.
Detailed description
This is a behavioral study. The researchers will measures performance on multiple tasks. 1) a cued attentional suppression task, where participants are told the color of the item they are supposed to ignore on each trial. 2) a learned attentional suppression task, where participants learn over experience that a particular color is not the target. 3) a visual working memory capacity measurement 4) an inattentive trait report task, where participants report their experiences of inattention during their daily lives.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Within-subjects measures, correlational analysis
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Attention and Working Memory Tests | Experimental | Behavioral: Behavioral Measurement and self-reportAll participants will complete a series of behavioral tasks, including cued visual search with positive (target color), negative (distractor color) and neutral (baseline) cues, learned visual search with a repeated salient distractor color, a visual working memory capacity task, and a daily life inattentive traits questionnaire (self-report). Single Arm. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Normal or corrected-to-normal visual acuity, normal color vision
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- age
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Behavioral Measurement and self-reportMeasurements of behavioral performance and self-report | Behavioural | Attention and Working Memory Tests |
Primary outcome
Button Press Reaction Time
Time frame: 1 day
Reaction times on visual search task with positive, negative, and neutral cues
Learned Suppression Task
Time frame: 1 day
Reaction times on visual search task no salient distractor and learned salient distractor
Visual Working Memory Capacity
Time frame: 1 day
Visual Working Memory Capacity- Change Localization; Estimate of number of items maintained in working memory
Inattentive Traits Subscale of Adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Self Report Scale
Time frame: 1 day
Adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Self Report Scale (used on healthy adults), Inattentive Traits subscale. Higher values indicate more ADHD-like inattentive trait symptoms (0-45).
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Mar 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 22468723Arita JT, Carlisle NB, Woodman GF. Templates for rejection: configuring attention to ignore task-irrelevant features. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Jun;38(3):580-4. doi: 10.1037/a0027885. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Anonymous behavioral performance data will be available for other researchers upon request
Related trials for Healthy
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Study of Phenytoin Mucoadhesive Film for Oral Ulcers in Healthy Volunteers
Oral Ulcer, Oral Mucositis
Not yet recruiting
SUVY VerSus SAccharose (SUVISA)
Healthy Volunteers, Erythritol
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Reactogenicity, and Immunogenicity of mRNA-1010 in Healthy Children
Seasonal Influenza
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Microneurographic Assessment of Peripheral Nerves in Healthy Volunteers and Individuals With Sensory Dysfunction Caused by Inherited Mutations in the PIEZO2 Gene
PIEZO2-Deficiency Syndrome
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Connors Protocol for the Management and Use of Stored Human Specimens (Stored Human Specimens)
Healthy Volunteer Samples
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Nancy Carlisle, PhD principal investigator
Lehigh University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Behavioral Measurement and self-report in people with Healthy, run by Lehigh University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Nov 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Button Press Reaction Time (time frame: 1 day). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06074523, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Mar 2025.