Cesarean SectionITMNCT06076018
The Contribution of Intrathecal Morphine Administration to Postoperative Patient Satisfaction During Cesarean Delivery
A study testing Group morphine in people with Cesarean Section and Intrathecal Morphine, run by Ondokuz Mayıs University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Evaluating the contribution of intrathecal morphine administration to postoperative patient satisfaction during cesarean delivery with the QoR-40 (Quality of Recovery 40) patient satisfaction compilation quality scale, scored between 40-200, and demonstrating the difference in the global QoR-40 score. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 40 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Cesarean Section, Intrathecal Morphine, Quality of Recovery 40
- What is being tested?
- Group morphine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 20 Nov 2023to 30 Apr 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 40 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Between 18-40 years old,
- ASA physical status 2
- Patients who will give birth by elective cesarean section
Who cannot join
- Those who do not accept regional anesthesia,
- Pregnant women who have problems where spinal anesthesia is contraindicated, such as infection at the injection site, coagulopathy, bleeding diathesis, severe hypovolemia, increase in intracranial pressure, severe aortic stenosis, severe mitral stenosis,
- Patients with a history of allergy to any drug included in the study protocol
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Ondokuz Mayıs University Faculty of Medicine
Samsun
About this study
Evaluating the contribution of intrathecal morphine administration to postoperative patient satisfaction during cesarean delivery with the QoR-40 (Quality of Recovery 40) patient satisfaction compilation quality scale, scored between 40-200, and demonstrating the difference in the global QoR-40 score.
Read the detailed description
All patients, whose consent was obtained, were monitored for standard noninvasive blood pressure, heart rate (HR), electrocardiogram (ECG) findings, and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) in the operating room.
Patients were evaluated for side effects such as pain, nausea-vomiting, itching, sedation score, and respiratory depression (defined as respiratory rate <10/min or SpO2<93%) for 24 hours postoperatively. Evaluations were made at the 2nd, 4th, 6th, 8th, 12th and 24th hours postoperatively. Pain assessment was made with the 'Numeric Rating Scale' (NRS) (0-10, 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable), sedation assessment was made with the 'Ramsey Sedation Scale'. Nausea was evaluated as present or absent (0:absent, 1:present) and itching 'Verbal Descriptive Scale' (0: no itching, 1: was evaluated using mild, 2: moderate, 3: severe, 4: very severe).
At the 24th postoperative hour, all patients were visited in the ward and the QoR-40 (Quality of Recovery-40) patient satisfaction compilation quality scale, scored between 40-200, was filled out. The QoR-40 questionnaire is a self-rating questionnaire used to evaluate the quality of postoperative recovery and health status of patients in the early postoperative stages. For the first time, Myles et al. () in 2000 and was proven to be a valid test in Turkey by Karaman S. et al. in 2014. QoR-40 was used to evaluate the pain levels, physical and emotional status of patients; emotional state (n = 9), comfort ( It consists of five sections and 40 questions: n = 12), patient support (n = 7), physical independence (n = 5), and pain (n = 7). Each question is scored on a five-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5. The total score ranges from 40 (worst build quality) to 200 (best build quality).
This widely used survey has been successfully applied to populations with cultural and physical differences in many different countries. QoR-40 studies conducted after a wide variety of anesthesia and surgical techniques reveal how wide the field of use of the test is. As a result of all this, the researchers reported that the test was safe and applicable.
Maternal characteristics such as age, weight, height, gestational age, gravidity, parity, number of previous cesarean births and procedure time, and tubal ligation were recorded. Newborn characteristics were collected, including weight and Apgar scores
- Being tested
- Group morphine, Group placebo
- Keywords
- Quality of Recovery 40, intrathecal morphine, cesarean section
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Group morphineDrug
Also called intrathecal morphine
Spinal anesthesia will be applied to patients in a sitting position, with a midline approach, after aseptic conditions have been achieved. A 25 gauge pencil point spinal needle will be placed in the L3-4 or L4-5 space. Upon aspiration of clear cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), 12 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine and 20 mcg fentanyl will be administered intrathecally, and 120 mcg intrathecal morphine (ITM) will be administered to the morphine group. the 24th postoperative hour, all patients will be visited in the ward and the QoR-40 (Quality of Recovery-40) patient satisfaction recovery quality scale, scored between 40-200, will be filled out.
Group placeboOther
Also called control
Spinal anesthesia will be applied to patients in a sitting position, with a midline approach, after aseptic conditions have been achieved. A 25 gauge pencil point spinal needle will be placed in the L3-4 or L4-5 space. Upon aspiration of clear cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), 12 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine and 20 mcg fentanyl will be administered intrathecally. the 24th postoperative hour, all patients will be visited in the ward and the QoR-40 (Quality of Recovery-40) patient satisfaction recovery quality scale, scored between 40-200, will be filled out.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| intrathecal morphine | Active comparator | In spinal anesthesia, 12 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine and 20 mcg fentanyl, 120 mcg intrathecal morphine (ITM) will be administered intrathecally. Receives: Drug: Group morphine |
| intrathecal fentanyl | Placebo comparator | Intrathecal 12 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine and 20 mcg fentanyl in spinal anesthesia, ITM will not be applied Receives: Other: Group placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Difference in QoR-40 score at 24th postoperative hour
Evaluation of the contribution of intrathecal morphine application to postoperative patient satisfaction during cesarean delivery with the QoR-40 (Quality of Recovery 40) patient satisfaction compilation quality scale scored between 40-200 and the difference in the global QoR-40 score
Measured: Postoperative Day 1
Secondary outcomes (1)
Post-operative acute pain
Pain status at rest and while activity (coughing and walking) was assessed by NRS scores at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 hours after surgery. The NRS is an 11-point numeric scale which ranges from 0 to 10 at rest and during activity.
Measured: Postoperative Day 1
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Oct 2023
- Study start20 Nov 2023
- Primary completion1 Mar 2024
- Study completion30 Apr 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cesarean SectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Ondokuz Mayıs UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- In the study planned as a randomized clinical study, patients who use and do not use intrathecal morphine will be assigned to 2 groups, 30 people in each group, by the sealed envelope method. Patients, surgeons, and physicians who will perform postoperative evaluation and fill out the questionnaire will be blinded to the randomization of the groups.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ondokuz Mayıs University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ilke Tamdogan, Ondokuz Mayıs University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06076018
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- drilketamdogan
- Acronym
- ITM
- Status last verified
- May 2024
- First submitted
- 12 Sep 2023
- Last updated
- 17 May 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Dahl JB, Jeppesen IS, Jorgensen H, Wetterslev J, Moiniche S. Intraoperative and postoperative analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of intrathecal opioids in patients undergoing cesarean section with spinal anesthesia: a qualitative and quantitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Anesthesiology. 1999 Dec;91(6):1919-27. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199912000-00045. No abstract available.
PubMed 10598635Palmer CM, Emerson S, Volgoropolous D, Alves D. Dose-response relationship of intrathecal morphine for postcesarean analgesia. Anesthesiology. 1999 Feb;90(2):437-44. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199902000-00018.
PubMed 9952150Myles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, Melick J, Hensen S. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40. Br J Anaesth. 2000 Jan;84(1):11-5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013366.
PubMed 10740540Karaman S, Arici S, Dogru S, Karaman T, Tapar H, Kaya Z, Suren M, Gurler Balta M. Validation of the Turkish version of the Quality of Recovery-40 questionnaire. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Jan 15;12:8. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-8.
PubMed 24428925
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 May 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Contribution of Intrathecal Morphine Administration to Postoperative Patient Satisfaction During Cesarean Delivery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06076018
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ITM / drilketamdogan
- Keywords
- Quality of Recovery 40, intrathecal morphine, cesarean section
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ondokuz Mayıs UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 20 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Mar 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Apr 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Evaluating the contribution of intrathecal morphine administration to postoperative patient satisfaction during cesarean delivery with the QoR-40 (Quality of Recovery 40) patient satisfaction compilation quality scale, scored between 40-200, and demonstrating the difference in the global QoR-40 score.
Detailed description
All patients, whose consent was obtained, were monitored for standard noninvasive blood pressure, heart rate (HR), electrocardiogram (ECG) findings, and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) in the operating room.
Patients were evaluated for side effects such as pain, nausea-vomiting, itching, sedation score, and respiratory depression (defined as respiratory rate <10/min or SpO2<93%) for 24 hours postoperatively. Evaluations were made at the 2nd, 4th, 6th, 8th, 12th and 24th hours postoperatively. Pain assessment was made with the 'Numeric Rating Scale' (NRS) (0-10, 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable), sedation assessment was made with the 'Ramsey Sedation Scale'. Nausea was evaluated as present or absent (0:absent, 1:present) and itching 'Verbal Descriptive Scale' (0: no itching, 1: was evaluated using mild, 2: moderate, 3: severe, 4: very severe).
At the 24th postoperative hour, all patients were visited in the ward and the QoR-40 (Quality of Recovery-40) patient satisfaction compilation quality scale, scored between 40-200, was filled out. The QoR-40 questionnaire is a self-rating questionnaire used to evaluate the quality of postoperative recovery and health status of patients in the early postoperative stages. For the first time, Myles et al. () in 2000 and was proven to be a valid test in Turkey by Karaman S. et al. in 2014. QoR-40 was used to evaluate the pain levels, physical and emotional status of patients; emotional state (n = 9), comfort ( It consists of five sections and 40 questions: n = 12), patient support (n = 7), physical independence (n = 5), and pain (n = 7). Each question is scored on a five-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5. The total score ranges from 40 (worst build quality) to 200 (best build quality).
This widely used survey has been successfully applied to populations with cultural and physical differences in many different countries. QoR-40 studies conducted after a wide variety of anesthesia and surgical techniques reveal how wide the field of use of the test is. As a result of all this, the researchers reported that the test was safe and applicable.
Maternal characteristics such as age, weight, height, gestational age, gravidity, parity, number of previous cesarean births and procedure time, and tubal ligation were recorded. Newborn characteristics were collected, including weight and Apgar scores
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- In the study planned as a randomized clinical study, patients who use and do not use intrathecal morphine will be assigned to 2 groups, 30 people in each group, by the sealed envelope method. Patients, surgeons, and physicians who will perform postoperative evaluation and fill out the questionnaire will be blinded to the randomization of the groups.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| intrathecal morphine | Active comparator | Drug: Group morphineIn spinal anesthesia, 12 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine and 20 mcg fentanyl, 120 mcg intrathecal morphine (ITM) will be administered intrathecally. |
| intrathecal fentanyl | Placebo comparator | Other: Group placeboIntrathecal 12 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine and 20 mcg fentanyl in spinal anesthesia, ITM will not be applied |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 40 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Between 18-40 years old,
- ASA physical status 2
- Patients who will give birth by elective cesarean section
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Those who do not accept regional anesthesia,
- Pregnant women who have problems where spinal anesthesia is contraindicated, such as infection at the injection site, coagulopathy, bleeding diathesis, severe hypovolemia, increase in intracranial pressure, severe aortic stenosis, severe mitral stenosis,
- Patients with a history of allergy to any drug included in the study protocol
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Group morphineAlso: intrathecal morphineSpinal anesthesia will be applied to patients in a sitting position, with a midline approach, after aseptic conditions have been achieved. A 25 gauge pencil point spinal needle will be placed in the L3-4 or L4-5 space. Upon aspiration of clear cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), 12 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine and 20 mcg fentanyl will be administered intrathecally, and 120 mcg intrathecal morphine (ITM) will be administered to the morphine group. the 24th postoperative hour, all patients will be visited in the ward and the QoR-40 (Quality of Recovery-40) patient satisfaction recovery quality scale, scored between 40-200, will be filled out. | Drug | intrathecal morphine |
| Group placeboAlso: controlSpinal anesthesia will be applied to patients in a sitting position, with a midline approach, after aseptic conditions have been achieved. A 25 gauge pencil point spinal needle will be placed in the L3-4 or L4-5 space. Upon aspiration of clear cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), 12 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine and 20 mcg fentanyl will be administered intrathecally. the 24th postoperative hour, all patients will be visited in the ward and the QoR-40 (Quality of Recovery-40) patient satisfaction recovery quality scale, scored between 40-200, will be filled out. | Other | intrathecal fentanyl |
Primary outcome
Difference in QoR-40 score at 24th postoperative hour
Time frame: Postoperative Day 1
Evaluation of the contribution of intrathecal morphine application to postoperative patient satisfaction during cesarean delivery with the QoR-40 (Quality of Recovery 40) patient satisfaction compilation quality scale scored between 40-200 and the difference in the global QoR-40 score
1 secondary outcome
Post-operative acute pain
Time frame: Postoperative Day 1
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 May 2024.
- Background: PubMed 10598635Dahl JB, Jeppesen IS, Jorgensen H, Wetterslev J, Moiniche S. Intraoperative and postoperative analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of intrathecal opioids in patients undergoing cesarean section with spinal anesthesia: a qualitative and quantitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Anesthesiology. 1999 Dec;91(6):1919-27. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199912000-00045. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 9952150Palmer CM, Emerson S, Volgoropolous D, Alves D. Dose-response relationship of intrathecal morphine for postcesarean analgesia. Anesthesiology. 1999 Feb;90(2):437-44. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199902000-00018.
- Background: PubMed 10740540Myles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, Melick J, Hensen S. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40. Br J Anaesth. 2000 Jan;84(1):11-5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013366.
- Background: PubMed 24428925Karaman S, Arici S, Dogru S, Karaman T, Tapar H, Kaya Z, Suren M, Gurler Balta M. Validation of the Turkish version of the Quality of Recovery-40 questionnaire. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Jan 15;12:8. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-8.
Related trials for Cesarean Section
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Effect of Two Different Doses of Intravenous Oxytocin on Patients Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section
Postpartum Hemorrhage, Uterine Atony
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Ultrasound Assessment Of Gastric Volume In Pregnant Women Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM), Obstetric Anesthesia
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Pain in Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section at Assuit University Hospital
Cesarean Section
Active, not recruiting
Implementation of a Disparities in Labor Outcomes Dashboard
Labor Induction, Cesarean Birth
RecruitingPhase 1
Ketamine Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics for Postpartum Depression and Pain After Cesarean Delivery
Pain, Postpartum Depression
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Group morphine in people with Cesarean Section and Intrathecal Morphine, run by Ondokuz Mayıs University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Difference in QoR-40 score at 24th postoperative hour (time frame: Postoperative Day 1). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06076018, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 May 2024.