Impaired Visual AcuityODYSSEYNCT06076785
Impact of ODYSight in the Management of patientS With imparairEd Visual acuitY
An observational study of Impaired Visual Acuity, run by Tilak Healthcare at 8 sites in France.
Trial summary
Previous investigations have demonstrated the agreement between OdySight® and standardised methods in the evaluation of near visual acuity. The app allows for remote monitoring of this parameter with tracking changes. In case of decrease in visual acuity, a notification is sent to both patient and ophthalmologist. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Impaired Visual Acuity
- What is being tested?
- OdySight
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 300 participants
- Where
- 8 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 27 Jan 2023to 31 Jan 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Subjects with a near visual acuity between 0.0 and 1.0 logMAR in at least one eye, and binocular VA equal to or better than 0.5 logMAR are targeted for this study.
Who may be able to join
- OdySight® user (between 07/21/2021 and 11/14/2022),
- Performed at least 3 tests on the same eye (minimum number of tests to trigger an alert).
Who cannot join
- Opposition to personal data collection and processing,
- Patient's death is documented.
Trial locations and contacts
8 sites in 1 country.
8 sites in 1 country
France8 sites
Centre Ophtalmologique Oculus
Chambéry, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, 73000
SELARL Dr Boulet
Évreux, Normandy, 27000
Centre Ophtalmologique Rabelais
Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, 69002
Clinique Honoré Cave
Montauban, Occitanie, 82000
Institut Ophtalmologique de l'Ouest Jules Verne
Nantes, Pays de la Loire Region, 44300
Hôpital des XV-XX
Paris, Île-de-France Region, 75012
Clinique Mathilde
Rouen, Normandy, 76000
Institut ophtalmologique Sourdille Atlantique
Saint-Herblain, Pays de la Loire Region, 44800
About this study
Official title: Impact of ODYSight in the Management of patientS With imparairEd Visual acuitY (ODYSSEY).
Previous investigations have demonstrated the agreement between OdySight® and standardised methods in the evaluation of near visual acuity. The app allows for remote monitoring of this parameter with tracking changes. In case of decrease in visual acuity, a notification is sent to both patient and ophthalmologist. The aim of this study is to evaluate the medical relevance of OdySight® features in the management of patients suffering from impaired visual acuity.
Read the detailed description
Near or distance vision impairment is affecting more and more patients each year and the prevalence is about 2.2 billion people around the world. It has been estimated that in almost half of the cases, the vision impairment has not yet been addressed or could have been prevented. The most important causes of vision impairment are:
- Age-related macular degeneration (AMD),
- Cataract,
- Diabetic retinopathy,
- Glaucoma,
- Uncorrected refracted errors. Among the strategies setup to address vision impairment, preventive care and follow-up treatment and recurrent vision monitoring are the most performant. Standard clinical care requiring patient to physically attend can be a burden for an effective care.
Remote monitoring of visual acuity and follow-up of patients suffering from visual impairment using home-based solutions have known a great outbreak in the las few years. The use of smartphones and tablets supporting applications developed to monitor and evaluate patient's vision has considerably evolved. Moreover, the recent COVID-19 pandemic underlined the need to develop qualified remote care systems to enhance healthcare access.
In the last decade, several tools were developed in the field of ophthalmology for visual function self assessment. The Visual Acuity (VA) testing is the most performed ophthalmologic examination to evaluate patient's potential visual impairment and can be tested either classically with letters optotype charts and projection systems or more recently with the help of digital tools. These tools allow patients to evaluate their VA using applications designed for smartphones, tablets, or computers.
In the standard clinical practice, the VA testing is mostly performed using a Snellen chart (black letters and optotypes of different sizes printed on a white chart), developed in 1862. This tool has been progressively improved, notably with the development of ETDRS charts, considered more accurate and that are thus used in research. These tools required the patient to physically attend the clinical examination, which is sometimes difficult to achieve considering patient mobility issues (age, disability, lack of transportation…), the lack of clinical practices in some areas, or other reasons.
Digital VA testing tools are an interesting alternative to the standard tests performed in clinic.
Nevertheless, their development implies a clinical validation research and certification, to be used for patient ophthalmic care.
Several studies have proved the reliability of digital systems for VA measurement, in remotely operated systems. In 2012, the equivalence of VA measurement using a computer-based logarithmic (logMAR) chart with the standard examination in the physical presence of an optometrist was shown. There was no statistically significant difference between the median VA measurement assessed by the two methods (physical optometrist or remote computer-based system).
The feasibility and the accuracy of a smartphone-based method for VA testing has been addressed in 2014, in the context of Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) testing, using the SightBookTM application. The results of the study evidenced test-retest high reliability and concordance with EDTRS distance VA testing and standard near vision testing.
More recently, VA testing methods have been compared using standard ETDRS chart, near chart and a smartphone-based eye chart application. The study concludes in favour of an equivalent efficiency of the three methods, suggesting a potential interest for remote VA-testing especially when standard clinical examination is not possible or difficult.
Another study, evaluating a smartphone-based VA testing (logMAR) reliability for test-retest compared to standard care showed promising results for remote healthcare and accessibility.
Interestingly, remote VA testing has been shown to be efficient in both adults and children.
The COVID-19 pandemic challenged standard ophthalmologic practice and revealed an acute need of remote healthcare access that emphasizes the development of more efficient tools for VA monitoring and clinical visit scheduling when required.
OdySight® is a medical application intended for patients 18 years of age and older for self-evaluation of visual parameters: near visual acuity and symptoms such as metamorphopsia and scotoma. The test results are sent to the doctor.
OdySight® does not provide any interpretation of the test results and is not intended to provide a diagnosis. OdySight® helps patients to determine whether they need to consult a doctor for diagnosis and treatment.
Three clinical studies have been conducted to evaluate the Odysight® application efficiency compared to standard ophthalmologic care.
In 2019, a prospective, open-labelled, single-arm, single-site study has been performed to compare the results of gold standard VA testing (Sloan ETDRS letter chart for near and distance vision testing), contrast sensitivity (Pelli-Robson chart), and metamorphopsia/scotoma (Amster Grid). The analysis showed a concordance between the results obtained with the OdySight® VA module and the Sloan ETDRS (near and distance). No significant difference has been shown between the OdySight® Amsler Grid module and standard metamorphopsia/scotoma testing. On the other hand, a broader disagreement has been pointed out for the evaluation of contrast sensitivity between the standard Pelli-Robson test and the OdySight® module, which would require more investigation.
The overall results are in favour of using the OdySight® application for remote monitoring of vision between clinic visits and potential assistance for follow-up scheduling.
In 2021, the implementation and clinical efficacy of the OdySight® application was evaluated in a study involving patients (n=60) with oedematous maculopathies receiving standard care. Patients were offered to use OdySight® to self-evaluate changes in their VA. The use of the application and the processing of notifications for VA decrease by the clinical team was analysed for one year to assess the feasibility and the reliability of the system. In all, about 60% of the patients completed at least one test following the prescription and almost 25% of the patients were still using the application after one month. During this trial, 19 notifications for VA decrease were processed by the clinical team in an average of less than 6 days. The decrease in VA was detected with a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 99%.
An observational, retrospective, multicentric study, published in 2022, was conducted to evaluate the additional value of using the OdySight® application in addition to a standard follow-up for the detection of exudatives recurrences in patients suffering from macular oedema. In all, 123 patients (149 eyes) were included in the study. The sensitivity of the alerts for the detection of recurrences was around 30%, and the specificity reached 84%. In total, 12 alerts on 39 detected a recurrence and 8 of them resulted in rescheduling or advancement of intravitreal injection. Although the sensitivity and the specificity appear to be a bit low, exudatives recurrences not being necessarily associated to a decrease in VA, the results of the study confirm that OdySight® use can be of interest in the detection of recurrence in advance and allow an anticipated readjustment of the treatment in addition with a standard care follow-up.
- Conditions
- Impaired Visual Acuity
- Being tested
- OdySight
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
OdySightDevice
At home measurements of visual acuity through a mobile app.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| OdySight users | OdySight users between 07/21/2021 and 11/14/2022 who performed Visual Acuity testing through OdySight and according to standard practice. Receives: Device: OdySight |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Impact of OdySight® in the management of patients suffering from impaired visual acuity.
Number of patients concerned by one or more OdySight® notification(s) for visual acuity decrease followed by a visit where at least one of the following situations is noticed:
- Visual acuity decrease
- Anatomic ophthalmic deterioration
- Prescription impact
- Second eye newly affected and/or development of the pathology to the second eye
Measured: At least 3 months of follow-up.
Secondary outcomes (1)
Performances of OdySight® in tracking visual acuity decrease and/or anatomic change.
Sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predicted Value and Negative Predicted Value of OdySight® in tracking visual acuity decrease and/or anatomic change with subgroups analysis.
Measured: At least 3 months of follow-up.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Oct 2023
- Study start27 Jan 2023
- Primary completion31 Dec 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Jan 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Impaired Visual AcuityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Tilak Healthcare
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Bénédicte BROUSSEAU, MD, Principal investigator, Centre Ophtalmologique OphtallianceMaddalena QUARANTA, MD, Principal investigator, Centre Ophtalmologique RabelaisVincent GUALINO, MD, Principal investigator, Clinique Honoré CaveJean-François GIRMENS, MD, Principal investigator, Hopital des XV-XXIsabelle FOURNIER, MD, Principal investigator, Institut ophtalmologique Sourdille AtlantiqueMarie-Noëlle GUILLEMOT, MD, Principal investigator, Institut ophtalmologique Sourdille AtlantiqueJean-François BOULET, MD, Principal investigator, Cabinet d'ophtalmologiePierre-Olivier LAFONTAINE, MD, Principal investigator, Centre Ophtalmologique Oculus
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06076785
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TIL-003
- Acronym
- ODYSSEY
- Status last verified
- Nov 2023
- First submitted
- 4 Oct 2023
- Last updated
- 7 Nov 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
GBD 2019 Blindness and Vision Impairment Collaborators; Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study. Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: the Right to Sight: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Feb;9(2):e144-e160. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30489-7. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
PubMed 33275949Claessens JLJ, Geuvers JR, Imhof SM, Wisse RPL. Digital Tools for the Self-Assessment of Visual Acuity: A Systematic Review. Ophthalmol Ther. 2021 Dec;10(4):715-730. doi: 10.1007/s40123-021-00360-3. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
PubMed 34169468Srinivasan K, Ramesh SV, Babu N, Sanker N, Ray A, Karuna SM. Efficacy of a remote based computerised visual acuity measurement. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jul;96(7):987-90. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-301751. Epub 2012 Apr 26.
PubMed 22539747Yeung WK, Dawes P, Pye A, Neil M, Aslam T, Dickinson C, Leroi I. eHealth tools for the self-testing of visual acuity: a scoping review. NPJ Digit Med. 2019 Aug 22;2:82. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0154-5. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 31453377Williams AM, Kalra G, Commiskey PW, Bowers EMR, Rudolph BR, Pitcher MD, Dansingani KK, Jhanji V, Nischal KK, Sahel JA, Waxman EL, Fu R. Ophthalmology Practice During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: The University of Pittsburgh Experience in Promoting Clinic Safety and Embracing Video Visits. Ophthalmol Ther. 2020 Sep;9(3):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s40123-020-00255-9. Epub 2020 May 6.
PubMed 32377502Tiraset N, Poonyathalang A, Padungkiatsagul T, Deeyai M, Vichitkunakorn P, Vanikieti K. Comparison of Visual Acuity Measurement Using Three Methods: Standard ETDRS Chart, Near Chart and a Smartphone-Based Eye Chart Application. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Feb 26;15:859-869. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S304272. eCollection 2021.
PubMed 33664563Miller JM, Jang HS, Ramesh D, Gonzalez Marshall MS, Yescas S, Harvey EM. Telemedicine distance and near visual acuity tests for adults and children. J AAPOS. 2020 Aug;24(4):235-236. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2020.06.003. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
PubMed 32739362Iskander M, Hu G, Sood S, Heilenbach N, Sanchez V, Ogunsola T, Chen D, Elgin C, Patel V, Wronka A, Al-Aswad LA. Validation of the New York University Langone Eye Test Application, a Smartphone-Based Visual Acuity Test. Ophthalmol Sci. 2022 Jun 15;2(3):100182. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2022.100182. eCollection 2022 Sep.
PubMed 36245756Kielwasser G, Kodjikian L, Dot C, Burillon C, Denis P, Mathis T. Real-Life Value of the Odysight(R) Application in At-Home Screening for Exudative Recurrence of Macular Edema. J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 26;11(17):5010. doi: 10.3390/jcm11175010.
PubMed 36078941Guigou S, Michel T, Merite PY, Coupier L, Meyer F. Home vision monitoring in patients with maculopathy: Real-life study of the OdySight application. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2021 Jun;44(6):873-881. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2020.09.034. Epub 2021 May 20.
PubMed 34024655Brucker J, Bhatia V, Sahel JA, Girmens JF, Mohand-Said S. Odysight: A Mobile Medical Application Designed for Remote Monitoring-A Prospective Study Comparison with Standard Clinical Eye Tests. Ophthalmol Ther. 2019 Sep;8(3):461-476. doi: 10.1007/s40123-019-0203-9. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
PubMed 31346977Allen L, Thirunavukarasu AJ, Podgorski S, Mullinger D. Novel web application for self-assessment of distance visual acuity to support remote consultation: a real-world validation study in children. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2021 Sep 30;6(1):e000801. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2021-000801. eCollection 2021.
PubMed 34651083
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Nov 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Impact of ODYSight in the Management of patientS With imparairEd Visual acuitY (ODYSSEY).
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06076785
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ODYSSEY / TIL-003
- Conditions
- Impaired Visual Acuity
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Tilak HealthcareIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 27 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Jan 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Previous investigations have demonstrated the agreement between OdySight® and standardised methods in the evaluation of near visual acuity. The app allows for remote monitoring of this parameter with tracking changes. In case of decrease in visual acuity, a notification is sent to both patient and ophthalmologist. The aim of this study is to evaluate the medical relevance of OdySight® features in the management of patients suffering from impaired visual acuity.
Detailed description
Near or distance vision impairment is affecting more and more patients each year and the prevalence is about 2.2 billion people around the world. It has been estimated that in almost half of the cases, the vision impairment has not yet been addressed or could have been prevented. The most important causes of vision impairment are:
- Age-related macular degeneration (AMD),
- Cataract,
- Diabetic retinopathy,
- Glaucoma,
- Uncorrected refracted errors. Among the strategies setup to address vision impairment, preventive care and follow-up treatment and recurrent vision monitoring are the most performant. Standard clinical care requiring patient to physically attend can be a burden for an effective care.
Remote monitoring of visual acuity and follow-up of patients suffering from visual impairment using home-based solutions have known a great outbreak in the las few years. The use of smartphones and tablets supporting applications developed to monitor and evaluate patient's vision has considerably evolved. Moreover, the recent COVID-19 pandemic underlined the need to develop qualified remote care systems to enhance healthcare access.
In the last decade, several tools were developed in the field of ophthalmology for visual function self assessment. The Visual Acuity (VA) testing is the most performed ophthalmologic examination to evaluate patient's potential visual impairment and can be tested either classically with letters optotype charts and projection systems or more recently with the help of digital tools. These tools allow patients to evaluate their VA using applications designed for smartphones, tablets, or computers.
In the standard clinical practice, the VA testing is mostly performed using a Snellen chart (black letters and optotypes of different sizes printed on a white chart), developed in 1862. This tool has been progressively improved, notably with the development of ETDRS charts, considered more accurate and that are thus used in research. These tools required the patient to physically attend the clinical examination, which is sometimes difficult to achieve considering patient mobility issues (age, disability, lack of transportation…), the lack of clinical practices in some areas, or other reasons.
Digital VA testing tools are an interesting alternative to the standard tests performed in clinic.
Nevertheless, their development implies a clinical validation research and certification, to be used for patient ophthalmic care.
Several studies have proved the reliability of digital systems for VA measurement, in remotely operated systems. In 2012, the equivalence of VA measurement using a computer-based logarithmic (logMAR) chart with the standard examination in the physical presence of an optometrist was shown. There was no statistically significant difference between the median VA measurement assessed by the two methods (physical optometrist or remote computer-based system).
The feasibility and the accuracy of a smartphone-based method for VA testing has been addressed in 2014, in the context of Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) testing, using the SightBookTM application. The results of the study evidenced test-retest high reliability and concordance with EDTRS distance VA testing and standard near vision testing.
More recently, VA testing methods have been compared using standard ETDRS chart, near chart and a smartphone-based eye chart application. The study concludes in favour of an equivalent efficiency of the three methods, suggesting a potential interest for remote VA-testing especially when standard clinical examination is not possible or difficult.
Another study, evaluating a smartphone-based VA testing (logMAR) reliability for test-retest compared to standard care showed promising results for remote healthcare and accessibility.
Interestingly, remote VA testing has been shown to be efficient in both adults and children.
The COVID-19 pandemic challenged standard ophthalmologic practice and revealed an acute need of remote healthcare access that emphasizes the development of more efficient tools for VA monitoring and clinical visit scheduling when required.
OdySight® is a medical application intended for patients 18 years of age and older for self-evaluation of visual parameters: near visual acuity and symptoms such as metamorphopsia and scotoma. The test results are sent to the doctor.
OdySight® does not provide any interpretation of the test results and is not intended to provide a diagnosis. OdySight® helps patients to determine whether they need to consult a doctor for diagnosis and treatment.
Three clinical studies have been conducted to evaluate the Odysight® application efficiency compared to standard ophthalmologic care.
In 2019, a prospective, open-labelled, single-arm, single-site study has been performed to compare the results of gold standard VA testing (Sloan ETDRS letter chart for near and distance vision testing), contrast sensitivity (Pelli-Robson chart), and metamorphopsia/scotoma (Amster Grid). The analysis showed a concordance between the results obtained with the OdySight® VA module and the Sloan ETDRS (near and distance). No significant difference has been shown between the OdySight® Amsler Grid module and standard metamorphopsia/scotoma testing. On the other hand, a broader disagreement has been pointed out for the evaluation of contrast sensitivity between the standard Pelli-Robson test and the OdySight® module, which would require more investigation.
The overall results are in favour of using the OdySight® application for remote monitoring of vision between clinic visits and potential assistance for follow-up scheduling.
In 2021, the implementation and clinical efficacy of the OdySight® application was evaluated in a study involving patients (n=60) with oedematous maculopathies receiving standard care. Patients were offered to use OdySight® to self-evaluate changes in their VA. The use of the application and the processing of notifications for VA decrease by the clinical team was analysed for one year to assess the feasibility and the reliability of the system. In all, about 60% of the patients completed at least one test following the prescription and almost 25% of the patients were still using the application after one month. During this trial, 19 notifications for VA decrease were processed by the clinical team in an average of less than 6 days. The decrease in VA was detected with a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 99%.
An observational, retrospective, multicentric study, published in 2022, was conducted to evaluate the additional value of using the OdySight® application in addition to a standard follow-up for the detection of exudatives recurrences in patients suffering from macular oedema. In all, 123 patients (149 eyes) were included in the study. The sensitivity of the alerts for the detection of recurrences was around 30%, and the specificity reached 84%. In total, 12 alerts on 39 detected a recurrence and 8 of them resulted in rescheduling or advancement of intravitreal injection. Although the sensitivity and the specificity appear to be a bit low, exudatives recurrences not being necessarily associated to a decrease in VA, the results of the study confirm that OdySight® use can be of interest in the detection of recurrence in advance and allow an anticipated readjustment of the treatment in addition with a standard care follow-up.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| OdySight users | – | Device: OdySightOdySight users between 07/21/2021 and 11/14/2022 who performed Visual Acuity testing through OdySight and according to standard practice. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Subjects with a near visual acuity between 0.0 and 1.0 logMAR in at least one eye, and binocular VA equal to or better than 0.5 logMAR are targeted for this study.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- OdySight® user (between 07/21/2021 and 11/14/2022),
- Performed at least 3 tests on the same eye (minimum number of tests to trigger an alert).
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Opposition to personal data collection and processing,
- Patient's death is documented.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| OdySightAt home measurements of visual acuity through a mobile app. | Device | OdySight users |
Primary outcome
Impact of OdySight® in the management of patients suffering from impaired visual acuity.
Time frame: At least 3 months of follow-up.
Number of patients concerned by one or more OdySight® notification(s) for visual acuity decrease followed by a visit where at least one of the following situations is noticed: * Visual acuity decrease * Anatomic ophthalmic deterioration * Prescription impact * Second eye newly affected and/or development of the pathology to the second eye
1 secondary outcome
Performances of OdySight® in tracking visual acuity decrease and/or anatomic change.
Time frame: At least 3 months of follow-up.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Nov 2023.
- Background: PubMed 33275949GBD 2019 Blindness and Vision Impairment Collaborators; Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study. Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: the Right to Sight: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Feb;9(2):e144-e160. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30489-7. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
- Background: PubMed 34169468Claessens JLJ, Geuvers JR, Imhof SM, Wisse RPL. Digital Tools for the Self-Assessment of Visual Acuity: A Systematic Review. Ophthalmol Ther. 2021 Dec;10(4):715-730. doi: 10.1007/s40123-021-00360-3. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
- Background: PubMed 22539747Srinivasan K, Ramesh SV, Babu N, Sanker N, Ray A, Karuna SM. Efficacy of a remote based computerised visual acuity measurement. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jul;96(7):987-90. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-301751. Epub 2012 Apr 26.
- Background: PubMed 31453377Yeung WK, Dawes P, Pye A, Neil M, Aslam T, Dickinson C, Leroi I. eHealth tools for the self-testing of visual acuity: a scoping review. NPJ Digit Med. 2019 Aug 22;2:82. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0154-5. eCollection 2019.
- Background: PubMed 32377502Williams AM, Kalra G, Commiskey PW, Bowers EMR, Rudolph BR, Pitcher MD, Dansingani KK, Jhanji V, Nischal KK, Sahel JA, Waxman EL, Fu R. Ophthalmology Practice During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: The University of Pittsburgh Experience in Promoting Clinic Safety and Embracing Video Visits. Ophthalmol Ther. 2020 Sep;9(3):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s40123-020-00255-9. Epub 2020 May 6.
- Background: PubMed 33664563Tiraset N, Poonyathalang A, Padungkiatsagul T, Deeyai M, Vichitkunakorn P, Vanikieti K. Comparison of Visual Acuity Measurement Using Three Methods: Standard ETDRS Chart, Near Chart and a Smartphone-Based Eye Chart Application. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Feb 26;15:859-869. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S304272. eCollection 2021.
- Background: PubMed 32739362Miller JM, Jang HS, Ramesh D, Gonzalez Marshall MS, Yescas S, Harvey EM. Telemedicine distance and near visual acuity tests for adults and children. J AAPOS. 2020 Aug;24(4):235-236. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2020.06.003. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
- Background: PubMed 36245756Iskander M, Hu G, Sood S, Heilenbach N, Sanchez V, Ogunsola T, Chen D, Elgin C, Patel V, Wronka A, Al-Aswad LA. Validation of the New York University Langone Eye Test Application, a Smartphone-Based Visual Acuity Test. Ophthalmol Sci. 2022 Jun 15;2(3):100182. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2022.100182. eCollection 2022 Sep.
- Background: PubMed 36078941Kielwasser G, Kodjikian L, Dot C, Burillon C, Denis P, Mathis T. Real-Life Value of the Odysight(R) Application in At-Home Screening for Exudative Recurrence of Macular Edema. J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 26;11(17):5010. doi: 10.3390/jcm11175010.
- Background: PubMed 34024655Guigou S, Michel T, Merite PY, Coupier L, Meyer F. Home vision monitoring in patients with maculopathy: Real-life study of the OdySight application. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2021 Jun;44(6):873-881. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2020.09.034. Epub 2021 May 20.
- Background: PubMed 31346977Brucker J, Bhatia V, Sahel JA, Girmens JF, Mohand-Said S. Odysight: A Mobile Medical Application Designed for Remote Monitoring-A Prospective Study Comparison with Standard Clinical Eye Tests. Ophthalmol Ther. 2019 Sep;8(3):461-476. doi: 10.1007/s40123-019-0203-9. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
- Background: PubMed 34651083Allen L, Thirunavukarasu AJ, Podgorski S, Mullinger D. Novel web application for self-assessment of distance visual acuity to support remote consultation: a real-world validation study in children. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2021 Sep 30;6(1):e000801. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2021-000801. eCollection 2021.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Impaired Visual Acuity
Recruiting
Implementing AI-based Glaucoma Screening Within Federally Qualified Health Centers
Glaucoma, Ocular Hypertension
RecruitingPhase 3
Intravitreal Faricimab Injections or Fluocinolone Acetonide (0.19 mg) Intravitreal Implants vs Observation for Prevention of VA Loss Due to Radiation Retinopathy
Radiation Retinopathy, Visual Impairment
RecruitingPhase 3
OPI-NXYDLD-303 Safety and Efficacy of Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution in Keratorefractive Surgery Participants With Decreased Mesopic Visual Acuity
Vision Loss Night, Vision Disorders
Not yet recruiting
Non-invasive Induction of Metaplasticity for Amblyopia
Amblyopia, Amblyopia Unilateral
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Valproate for the Treatment of Residual Amblyopia
Amblyopia, Amblyopia Unilateral
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bénédicte BROUSSEAU, MD principal investigator
Centre Ophtalmologique Ophtalliance
Maddalena QUARANTA, MD principal investigator
Centre Ophtalmologique Rabelais
Vincent GUALINO, MD principal investigator
Clinique Honoré Cave
8 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Impaired Visual Acuity, run by Tilak Healthcare at 8 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 8 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Impact of OdySight® in the management of patients suffering from impaired visual acuity. (time frame: At least 3 months of follow-up.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06076785, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Nov 2023.