Chronic Low-back PainNCT06078033
Efficacy of Mobilization With Movement on Conditioned Pain Modulation in Chronic Low Back Pain Patients
A study testing Mobilization with movement in people with Chronic Low-back Pain, run by Eleuterio Atanasio Sánchez Romero at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
Patients with chronic low back pain may have altered endogenous mechanisms, which can be evaluated with conditioned modulation paradigms. Mobilization with movement has demonstrated improvements in endogenous analgesic mechanisms in conditions such as knee osteoarthritis or lateral epicondylalgia. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Low-back Pain
- What is being tested?
- Mobilization with movement
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 58 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 2 Dec 2023to 20 May 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adults with chronic low back pain (>3 months of pain duration)
- 2 or more on a scale of 0 to 10.
Who cannot join
- Radiculopathy
- Neurological signs, symptoms, or deficit
- Rheumatic or autoimmune disease
- Cutaneous disease
- History of fracture or spinal surgery
- Pregnancy
Show all 10Show fewer
- Neuropathic pain
- Active cancer
- Spondylolysis/Spondylolisthesis
- Mild/Severe cognitive impairment which interferes with outcomes measurement
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Efficacy of Mobilization With Movement on Conditioned Pain Modulation in Chronic Low Back Pain Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Patients with chronic low back pain may have altered endogenous mechanisms, which can be evaluated with conditioned modulation paradigms. Mobilization with movement has demonstrated improvements in endogenous analgesic mechanisms in conditions such as knee osteoarthritis or lateral epicondylalgia. However, its effects have not yet been studied in patients with chronic low back pain. The objective of this randomized clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy of mobilization with movement compared to placebo on endogenous mechanisms in patients with chronic low back pain.
Read the detailed description
Low back pain is the leading cause of disability worldwide, and chronic low back pain (CLBP) has a prevalence of 2-25%, 80% of which are classified as non-specific low back pain because the causal factors have not yet been determined. Although different mechanisms can be attributed to the chronification of pain, a frequent denominator is the amplification of nociceptive transmission or decreased inhibition of nociceptive stimuli in the peripheral and/or central nervous system.
To assess inhibitory pathways, conditioned pain modulation (CPM) paradigms are commonly used in humans. They are based on the idea that a noxious stimulus applied to one part of the body can inhibit pain elsewhere by activating the descending inhibitory system.
When CPM is evaluated in patients with chronic low back pain, contradictory results are found, with studies reporting an alteration of pain modulation mechanisms and others not.
Different studies found that manual therapy can improve CPM compared to sham in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain, such as lateral epicondylalgia or knee osteoarthritis. However, its effects in patients with chronic low back pain have not yet been studied.
Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of mobilization with motion on CPM in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.
- Conditions
- Chronic Low-back Pain
- Being tested
- Mobilization with movement, Sham mobilization with movement
- Keywords
- Chronic low back pain, Manual therapy, Conditioned Pain Modulation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Mobilization with movementBiological
Sustained neutral apophyseal glide (SNAG) mobilization with movement applied to targeted vertebra while patients performed their painful movement.
Sham mobilization with movementBiological
Manual contact (without any pressure) applied to targeted vertebra while patients performed their painful movement.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention: Mobilization with movement (MWM) | Experimental | The MWM technique was performed by asking patients to perform their painful movement (flexion, extension…). If pain was not reproduced, a combination of movements (flexion + rotation…) was performed. The most painful vertebral level was also evaluated with passive accessory vertebral movements. Then, with the patient in a seated position on a stretcher with the feet supported and a belt around the waist, the therapist performed a sustained glide over the targeted vertebra (spinous process) with the force and direction that relieved pain to the lowest level and asked the patient to perform his previous painful movement, as described by Mulligan. Three sets of 10 repetitions were performed, with 1-2 minutes rest between sets. Receives: Biological: Mobilization with movement |
| Control: Sham mobilization with movement | Sham comparator | Patients allocated to sham group received same evaluation and treatment process. However, only manual contact was performed over the spinous process of the targeted vertebra, without the sustained glide and without applying any force. Three sets of 10 repetitions were performed, with 1-2 minutes rest between sets. Receives: Biological: Sham mobilization with movement |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Conditioned pain modulation
Conditioned pain modulation of low back, measured on interspace between L5 and S1. Pressure pain threshold (PPT) was used as test stimulus while ischemic pain (using cuff) was used as conditioning stimulus. CPM effect were calculated as the differences between the PPT values with and without the conditioning stimulus.
Measured: 30 minutes
Secondary outcomes (7)
Pressure pain threshold
Pressure pain thresholds (PPT), measured on interspace between L5 and S1. PPT were measured with an algometer placed and applied perpendicular to the skin. Pressure was gradually increased at a rate of 1kg/sec over the targeted location until patient indicated verbally that the sensation became painful. Measurements were taken two times at the location with 30 seconds rest interval between each measurement. The mean of the two measurements for targeted location was calculated for statistical analysis.
Measured: 30 minutes
Body Chart
Widespread pain was measured with body chart
Measured: Baseline
Kinesiophobia
Kinesiophobia was measured with Spanish version of Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia. Higher scores denotes greater fear of experiencing pain while moving.
Measured: Baseline
Depression
Depressive symptoms were measured with Spanish version of Beck Inventory II. 0-13 normal scores; 14-19 mild; 20-28 moderate; 29-63 severe depression.
Measured: Baseline
Anxiety
Anxiety was measured with Spanish version of State-trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Scores of 20-37 indicate no or low anxiety; 38-44 moderate anxiety; 45-80 high anxiety.
Measured: Baseline
Disability
Low back pain associated disability was measured with Spanish version of Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Higher scores denotes greater pain-associated disability.
Measured: Baseline
Quality of life (QoL)
QoL was measured with Spanish version of EuroQol 5-Dimensions. Quality of life visual analogue scale consist of a scale from 0 (worse quality of life) to 100 (best quality of life). Additionally, quality of life index may be summarised by a series of five sentences, one for each dimension and stating the level within that dimension; or a label consisting of five ordinal numbers, one for each dimension (by convention, in the order these appear in the questionnaire), defining the severity level, where 1 means no problems.
Measured: Baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Oct 2023
- Study start2 Dec 2023
- Primary completion20 May 2024
- Study completion20 May 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic Low-back PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 58 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Eleuterio Atanasio Sánchez Romero
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Eleuterio Atanasio Sánchez Romero, Universidad Europea de Madrid
- Investigators
- Oliver Martínez, PhDc, Principal investigator, Universidad Europea de Madrid
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06078033
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1811202225222
- Status last verified
- May 2024
- First submitted
- 29 Sep 2023
- Last updated
- 21 May 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Martinez-Pozas O, Sanchez-Romero EA, Beltran-Alacreu H, Arribas-Romano A, Cuenca-Martinez F, Villafane JH, Fernandez-Carnero J. Effects of Orthopedic Manual Therapy on Pain Sensitization in Patients With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: An Umbrella Review With Meta-Meta-analysis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Oct 1;102(10):879-885. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002239. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
PubMed 36917046Aoyagi K, He J, Nicol AL, Clauw DJ, Kluding PM, Jernigan S, Sharma NK. A Subgroup of Chronic Low Back Pain Patients With Central Sensitization. Clin J Pain. 2019 Nov;35(11):869-879. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000755.
PubMed 31408011Sánchez-Romero EA, González-Zamorano Y, Arribas-Romano A, Martínez-Pozas O, Fernández Espinar E, Pedersini P, Villafañe JH, Alonso Pérez JL, Fernández-Carnero J. Efficacy of Manual Therapy on Facilitatory Nociception and Endogenous Pain Modulation in Older Adults with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Case Series. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(4):1895. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041895
McPhee ME, Vaegter HB, Graven-Nielsen T. Alterations in pronociceptive and antinociceptive mechanisms in patients with low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Pain. 2020 Mar;161(3):464-475. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001737.
PubMed 32049888Neelapala YVR, Bhagat M, Frey-Law L. Conditioned Pain Modulation in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review of Literature. Clin J Pain. 2020 Feb;36(2):135-141. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000778.
PubMed 31764164den Bandt HL, Paulis WD, Beckwee D, Ickmans K, Nijs J, Voogt L. Pain Mechanisms in Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis of Mechanical Quantitative Sensory Testing Outcomes in People With Nonspecific Low Back Pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019 Oct;49(10):698-715. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2019.8876. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
PubMed 31443625Bisset L, Paungmali A, Vicenzino B, Beller E. A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials on physical interventions for lateral epicondylalgia. Br J Sports Med. 2005 Jul;39(7):411-22; discussion 411-22. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2004.016170.
PubMed 15976161
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 May 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy of Mobilization With Movement on Conditioned Pain Modulation in Chronic Low Back Pain Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06078033
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1811202225222
- Conditions
- Chronic Low-back Pain
- Keywords
- Chronic low back pain, Manual therapy, Conditioned Pain Modulation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 58 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Eleuterio Atanasio Sánchez RomeroUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 2 Dec 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 May 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 May 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Patients with chronic low back pain may have altered endogenous mechanisms, which can be evaluated with conditioned modulation paradigms. Mobilization with movement has demonstrated improvements in endogenous analgesic mechanisms in conditions such as knee osteoarthritis or lateral epicondylalgia. However, its effects have not yet been studied in patients with chronic low back pain. The objective of this randomized clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy of mobilization with movement compared to placebo on endogenous mechanisms in patients with chronic low back pain.
Detailed description
Low back pain is the leading cause of disability worldwide, and chronic low back pain (CLBP) has a prevalence of 2-25%, 80% of which are classified as non-specific low back pain because the causal factors have not yet been determined. Although different mechanisms can be attributed to the chronification of pain, a frequent denominator is the amplification of nociceptive transmission or decreased inhibition of nociceptive stimuli in the peripheral and/or central nervous system.
To assess inhibitory pathways, conditioned pain modulation (CPM) paradigms are commonly used in humans. They are based on the idea that a noxious stimulus applied to one part of the body can inhibit pain elsewhere by activating the descending inhibitory system.
When CPM is evaluated in patients with chronic low back pain, contradictory results are found, with studies reporting an alteration of pain modulation mechanisms and others not.
Different studies found that manual therapy can improve CPM compared to sham in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain, such as lateral epicondylalgia or knee osteoarthritis. However, its effects in patients with chronic low back pain have not yet been studied.
Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of mobilization with motion on CPM in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention: Mobilization with movement (MWM) | Experimental | Biological: Mobilization with movementThe MWM technique was performed by asking patients to perform their painful movement (flexion, extension…). If pain was not reproduced, a combination of movements (flexion + rotation…) was performed. The most painful vertebral level was also evaluated with passive accessory vertebral movements. Then, with the patient in a seated position on a stretcher with the feet supported and a belt around the waist, the therapist performed a sustained glide over the targeted vertebra (spinous process) with the force and direction that relieved pain to the lowest level and asked the patient to perform his previous painful movement, as described by Mulligan. Three sets of 10 repetitions were performed, with 1-2 minutes rest between sets. |
| Control: Sham mobilization with movement | Sham comparator | Biological: Sham mobilization with movementPatients allocated to sham group received same evaluation and treatment process. However, only manual contact was performed over the spinous process of the targeted vertebra, without the sustained glide and without applying any force. Three sets of 10 repetitions were performed, with 1-2 minutes rest between sets. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Adults with chronic low back pain (>3 months of pain duration)
- 2 or more on a scale of 0 to 10.
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Radiculopathy
- Neurological signs, symptoms, or deficit
- Rheumatic or autoimmune disease
- Cutaneous disease
- History of fracture or spinal surgery
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Mobilization with movementSustained neutral apophyseal glide (SNAG) mobilization with movement applied to targeted vertebra while patients performed their painful movement. | Biological | Intervention: Mobilization with movement (MWM) |
| Sham mobilization with movementManual contact (without any pressure) applied to targeted vertebra while patients performed their painful movement. | Biological | Control: Sham mobilization with movement |
Primary outcome
Conditioned pain modulation
Time frame: 30 minutes
Conditioned pain modulation of low back, measured on interspace between L5 and S1. Pressure pain threshold (PPT) was used as test stimulus while ischemic pain (using cuff) was used as conditioning stimulus. CPM effect were calculated as the differences between the PPT values with and without the conditioning stimulus.
7 secondary outcomes
Pressure pain threshold
Time frame: 30 minutes
Body Chart
Time frame: Baseline
Kinesiophobia
Time frame: Baseline
Depression
Time frame: Baseline
Anxiety
Time frame: Baseline
Disability
Time frame: Baseline
Quality of life (QoL)
Time frame: Baseline
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 May 2024.
- Results publication: PubMed 36917046Martinez-Pozas O, Sanchez-Romero EA, Beltran-Alacreu H, Arribas-Romano A, Cuenca-Martinez F, Villafane JH, Fernandez-Carnero J. Effects of Orthopedic Manual Therapy on Pain Sensitization in Patients With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: An Umbrella Review With Meta-Meta-analysis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Oct 1;102(10):879-885. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002239. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
- Results publication: PubMed 31408011Aoyagi K, He J, Nicol AL, Clauw DJ, Kluding PM, Jernigan S, Sharma NK. A Subgroup of Chronic Low Back Pain Patients With Central Sensitization. Clin J Pain. 2019 Nov;35(11):869-879. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000755.
- Results publicationSánchez-Romero EA, González-Zamorano Y, Arribas-Romano A, Martínez-Pozas O, Fernández Espinar E, Pedersini P, Villafañe JH, Alonso Pérez JL, Fernández-Carnero J. Efficacy of Manual Therapy on Facilitatory Nociception and Endogenous Pain Modulation in Older Adults with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Case Series. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(4):1895. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041895
- Results publication: PubMed 32049888McPhee ME, Vaegter HB, Graven-Nielsen T. Alterations in pronociceptive and antinociceptive mechanisms in patients with low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Pain. 2020 Mar;161(3):464-475. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001737.
- Results publication: PubMed 31764164Neelapala YVR, Bhagat M, Frey-Law L. Conditioned Pain Modulation in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review of Literature. Clin J Pain. 2020 Feb;36(2):135-141. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000778.
- Results publication: PubMed 31443625den Bandt HL, Paulis WD, Beckwee D, Ickmans K, Nijs J, Voogt L. Pain Mechanisms in Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis of Mechanical Quantitative Sensory Testing Outcomes in People With Nonspecific Low Back Pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019 Oct;49(10):698-715. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2019.8876. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
- Results publication: PubMed 15976161Bisset L, Paungmali A, Vicenzino B, Beller E. A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials on physical interventions for lateral epicondylalgia. Br J Sports Med. 2005 Jul;39(7):411-22; discussion 411-22. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2004.016170.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Chronic Low-back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises With and Without YTWL (Scapular Stabilization Exercises) on Reducing Chronic Low Back Pain and Related Disability. A Randomized Clinical Trial,
Chronic Non Specific Mechanical Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Not yet recruiting
Spinery Basivertebral Nerve Ablation for Vertebrogenic Chronic Low Back Pain
Low Back Pain, Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)
Enrolling by invitation
Effects of 3-dimensional Versus Dynamic Myofascial Release Techniques With Lumbar Mobilization and Exercise Therapy Program in Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain, Myofascial Release
RecruitingPhase 2
A Master Protocol Study (LY900028) of Multiple Intervention-Specific-Appendices (ISAs) in Participants With Chronic Pain
Osteoarthritis, Knee, Diabetic Neuropathic Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Oliver Martínez, PhDc principal investigator
Universidad Europea de Madrid
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Mobilization with movement in people with Chronic Low-back Pain, run by Eleuterio Atanasio Sánchez Romero at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Conditioned pain modulation (time frame: 30 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06078033, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 May 2024.