Shoulder Impingement SyndromeNCT06081088
Graded Motor Imagery Training in Shoulder Impingement Syndrome
A study testing Graded Motor Imagery (GMI) training, Conventional Physiotherapy and Home Exercise Program in people with Shoulder Impingement Syndrome and Pain, run by Marmara University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of Graded Motor Imagery (GMI) training on pain, functionality, disability and daily living activities in patients diagnosed with Shoulder Impingement Syndrome. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 25 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Shoulder Impingement Syndrome, Pain
- What is being tested?
- Graded Motor Imagery (GMI) training, Conventional Physiotherapy and Home Exercise Program
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 42 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 16 Oct 2023to 27 Jun 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 25 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Aged between 25-65 years old,
- Having been diagnosed with Shoulder Impingement Syndrome by physical examination and MRI as a result of shoulder pain lasting at least 3 months,
- Presence of a painful arc between 60° and 120° in shoulder flexion / abduction (elevation) movements,
- The Standardized Mini Mental Test result must be at least 24 points,
- Not having seen imagery practice before,
Who cannot join
- Having severe mental and communication problems,
- Having undergone surgical treatment on the same upper extremity,
- Presence of acute trauma, peripheral nervous system lesion, fracture or complete tendon rupture in the affected shoulder,
- Presence of other pathologies such as adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder joint complex and glenohumeral instability,
- Presence of radiotherapy history on the same side as the affected shoulder,
- Presence of congenital deformity,
Show all 10Show fewer
- Symptomatic cervical spine pathology,
- Presence of other neurological or rheumatological disorders affecting upper motor function,
- Having any chronic disease that would prevent participation in the treatment program,
- Having attended a physiotherapy program within the last month.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Marmara University
Istanbul, Başıbüyük, Süreyyapaşa Başıbüyük Yolu Sk No:4/B, 34854 Maltepe, 34854
About this study
Official title: The Effectiveness of Graded Motor Imagery Training in Patients With Shoulder Impingement Syndrome
The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of Graded Motor Imagery (GMI) training on pain, functionality, disability and daily living activities in patients diagnosed with Shoulder Impingement Syndrome.
Read the detailed description
In this study 42 voluntary patients with Shoulder Impingement Syndrome, aged between 25-65 years will be randomly divided into two groups; group1: "GMI + Conventional Physiotherapy", group 2: "Conventional Physiotherapy".
All participants will receive treatment with a physiotherapist three times a week for six-weeks (18 sessions). At the end of the 6th week, it will be followed regularly with a six-week home exercise program. It will be evaluated by a physiotherapist three times in total (before treatment, at the end of six-weeks of treatment and after six-weeks of follow-up). In addition, all patients will undergo an interim evaluation in terms of primary outcome measures (VAS and DASH score) at week three. The shoulder pain on activity, at rest and at night will be assessed with Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Joint Range of Motion (ROM) will be measured with digital goniometer, strength of shoulder flexor, abductor, external and internal rotator muscles will be assessed with digital dynamometer, functional status will be evaluated with Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, functional status of the hand will be evaluated with Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test (JTHFT), lateralization evaluation will be assessed with the Recognise™ application (Shoulder and Hand), and motor imagery will be evaluated with the Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnair (KVIQ). Patient satisfaction will be evaluated by the Global Rating of Change scale.
- Conditions
- Shoulder Impingement Syndrome, Pain
- Being tested
- Graded Motor Imagery (GMI) training, Conventional Physiotherapy, Home Exercise Program
- Keywords
- Shoulder Impingement Syndrome, Mirror Neurons, Pain, Functional Status, Rehabilitation
- Medical subject headings
- Shoulder Impingement Syndrome, Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Graded Motor Imagery (GMI) trainingOther
GMI consists of three basic components:
- Left / Right Discrimination training (Lateralization training): For lateralization training, patients will be trained by asking them to distinguish between right and left with images taken at various angles and positions in the RecogniseTM (NOI-Australia) applications (shoulder and hand sections) (In weeks 1 and 2).
- Motor Imagery (Explicit Motor Imagery): At this stage, the participant will be asked to imagine doing various functional activities (brushing teeth, combing hair, etc.) in the position they feel most comfortable in and in a quiet environment (In weeks 2 and 3).
- Mirror Therapy (providing visual feedback through a mirror): In this phase, active ROM exercises and progressive resistance exercises with simultaneous movement of the affected and unaffected extremities will be applied using a standard size posture mirror (In weeks 3-6).
This program will be applied for 6 weeks (3 sessions per week).
Conventional PhysiotherapyOther
Conventional physiotherapy program includes passive, active-assistive (wand exercises) and active ROM exercises for shoulder joint, passive / active posterior and anterior capsule stretching exercises, superior-inferior, mediolateral and distraction techniques for scapular mobilization exercises, shoulder flexion, abduction, internal and external rotation muscles strengthening exercises, static and dynamic stabilization exercises for proprioception exercises. To reduce the pain that may occur after exercises, cold application and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) will be applied to benefit from their analgesic effects. Cold application will be applied around the shoulder using a coldpack (gel pack) cold therapy for 15 minutes. Conventional TENS application around shoulder will be performed using a TENS device and four separate 2 × 2 inch self-adhesive electrodes for 15 minutes.This program will be applied for 6 weeks (3 sessions per week).
Home Exercise ProgramOther
The home exercises program includes shoulder jonit active ROM exercises, active posterior and anterior shoulder capsule stretching exercises, shoulder flexion, abduction, internal and external rotation muscles strengthening exercises, shoulder proprioception exercises, and cold therapy. This program will be applied for 6 weeks (3 sessions per week).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Experimental | Study group: "Graded Motor Imagery Training + Conventional Physiotherapy"
In this group, each participant will be received a treatment protocol consisting of Graded Motor Imagery training, conventional physiotherapy, and home exercises.
* Graded Motor Imagery (GMI)
* Conventional Physiotherapy Program
* Home Exercise Program Receives: Other: Graded Motor Imagery (GMI) training; Other: Conventional Physiotherapy; Other: Home Exercise Program |
| Group 2 | Active comparator | Control group: "Conventional Physiotherapy"
In this group, each participant will be received a treatment protocol consisting of conventional physiotherapy, and home exercises.
* Conventional Physiotherapy Program
* Home Exercise Program Receives: Other: Conventional Physiotherapy; Other: Home Exercise Program |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain intensity
Pain intensity will be assessed with Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is usually a horizontal line, 10 cm in length, anchored by word descriptors at each end with "No Pain" (score of zero) on the left side up to "pain as bad as it could be" or the "worst imaginable pain" (Score of 100 [100-mm scale]) on the right side.The patient will be asked to mark the line point that represented his or her current pain.
Measured: Baseline, Interim evaluation (At the end of the 3rd week), After the six-week intervention, After six-weeks of follow-up
Functional Status
The disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire will be used in shoulder functional status evaluation. The DASH consists mainly of a 30-item disability/symptom scale, scored 0 (no disability) to 100. 21 of the questions of the survey question the ability to perform functional activities, 5 question the pain, and 4 question the psychosocial effects of the disease. Each question is scored using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5 (1: no difficulty, 2: mild difficulty, 3: moderate difficulty, 4: extreme difficulty, 5: not at all). Higher scores indicate better functional status.
Measured: Baseline, Interim evaluation (At the end of the 3rd week), After the six-week intervention, After six-weeks of follow-up
Secondary outcomes (6)
Active Range Of Motion (AROM)
A digital goniometer will be used to measure shoulder active joint range of motion. While the patient is lying in the supine position, shoulder active flexion, active abduction, and then shoulder internal (internal) and external (external) rotation ROM measurements will be made with the shoulder in 90 degrees abduction and the elbow in 90 degrees flexion.
Measured: Baseline, After the six-week intervention, After six-weeks of follow-up
Isometric Muscle Strength
Isometric muscle strength of shoulder flexor, abductor, external and internal rotator muscles will be evaluated with a hand-held dynamometer. During muscle strength evaluation, patients will be asked to perform maximal voluntary isometric contraction while in a sitting position. Measurements will be repeated 3 times (5 seconds of contraction followed by 30 seconds of rest) for the affected side and the average of the 3 measurements will be taken and the resulting value will be recorded in kilograms (kg).
Measured: Baseline, After the six-week intervention, After six-weeks of follow-up
Functional Status Of the Hand
Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test (JTHFT) will be used to evaluate the functional status of the hand. JTHFT is a standardized and objective measure of fine and gross motor hand function using simulated activities of daily living. The JTHFT has seven subsets which are writing, simulated page-turning, lifting small objects, simulated feeding, stacking, and lifting large, lightweight, and heavy objects. Time will be recorded in this test. Except for writing, other tasks are done separately with both hands. The completion time of the tasks refers to the subtask scores and total score of JTHFT. The total score is obtained by adding up the completion time of the six tasks other than writing for the dominant and non-dominant hands.
Measured: Baseline, After the six-week intervention, After six-weeks of follow-up
Left/right discrimination (Lateralization)
Right-Left Discrimination will be evaluated with Recognise™ applications (Shoulder and Hand) developed by the "Neuro Orthopedic Institute".
Measured: Baseline, After the six-week intervention, After six-weeks of follow-up
Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire (KVIQ)
Motor imagery ability will be assessed with the Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire (KVIQ). The participant gives a score between 1 and 5 for the image he/she imagines: "1 point: no image, 5 points: as clear as the original." This process is repeated for each task and at the end of the survey, kinesthetic imagery score, visual imagery score and total score are calculated.
Measured: Baseline, After the six-week intervention, After six-weeks of follow-up
Global Rating of Change scale (Patient Satisfaction)
Patient satisfaction regarding improvement in shoulder function will be evulated by the Global Rating of Change scale. All participants will be asked to rate their condition after a six-week intervention period compared to baseline by indicating whether they have improved significantly, improved slightly, unchanged, deteriorated slightly, or deteriorated significantly in this study.
Measured: After the six-week intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Oct 2023
- Study start16 Oct 2023
- Primary completion27 Jun 2024
- Study completion27 Jun 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Shoulder Impingement SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Marmara UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Marmara University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- MASOUD AMIR RASHEDI BONAB, PhD, Principal investigator, Marmara University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06081088
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Marmara Uni.
- Status last verified
- Oct 2023
- First submitted
- 2 Oct 2023
- Last updated
- 28 Jun 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Araya-Quintanilla F, Gutierrez-Espinoza H, Jesus Munoz-Yanez M, Rubio-Oyarzun D, Cavero-Redondo I, Martinez-Vizcaino V, Alvarez-Bueno C. The Short-term Effect of Graded Motor Imagery on the Affective Components of Pain in Subjects with Chronic Shoulder Pain Syndrome: Open-Label Single-Arm Prospective Study. Pain Med. 2020 Oct 1;21(10):2496-2501. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz364.
PubMed 32003812Sawyer EE, McDevitt AW, Louw A, Puentedura EJ, Mintken PE. Use of Pain Neuroscience Education, Tactile Discrimination, and Graded Motor Imagery in an Individual With Frozen Shoulder. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018 Mar;48(3):174-184. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2018.7716. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
PubMed 29257926Louw A, Puentedura EJ, Reese D, Parker P, Miller T, Mintken PE. Immediate Effects of Mirror Therapy in Patients With Shoulder Pain and Decreased Range of Motion. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Oct;98(10):1941-1947. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.03.031. Epub 2017 May 5.
PubMed 28483657Moseley GL. Graded motor imagery for pathologic pain: a randomized controlled trial. Neurology. 2006 Dec 26;67(12):2129-34. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000249112.56935.32. Epub 2006 Nov 2.
PubMed 17082465
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Jun 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effectiveness of Graded Motor Imagery Training in Patients With Shoulder Impingement Syndrome
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06081088
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Marmara Uni.
- Conditions
- Shoulder Impingement Syndrome, Pain
- Keywords
- Shoulder Impingement Syndrome, Mirror Neurons, Pain, Functional Status, Rehabilitation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Marmara UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 16 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 Jun 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of Graded Motor Imagery (GMI) training on pain, functionality, disability and daily living activities in patients diagnosed with Shoulder Impingement Syndrome.
Detailed description
In this study 42 voluntary patients with Shoulder Impingement Syndrome, aged between 25-65 years will be randomly divided into two groups; group1: "GMI + Conventional Physiotherapy", group 2: "Conventional Physiotherapy".
All participants will receive treatment with a physiotherapist three times a week for six-weeks (18 sessions). At the end of the 6th week, it will be followed regularly with a six-week home exercise program. It will be evaluated by a physiotherapist three times in total (before treatment, at the end of six-weeks of treatment and after six-weeks of follow-up). In addition, all patients will undergo an interim evaluation in terms of primary outcome measures (VAS and DASH score) at week three. The shoulder pain on activity, at rest and at night will be assessed with Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Joint Range of Motion (ROM) will be measured with digital goniometer, strength of shoulder flexor, abductor, external and internal rotator muscles will be assessed with digital dynamometer, functional status will be evaluated with Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, functional status of the hand will be evaluated with Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test (JTHFT), lateralization evaluation will be assessed with the Recognise™ application (Shoulder and Hand), and motor imagery will be evaluated with the Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnair (KVIQ). Patient satisfaction will be evaluated by the Global Rating of Change scale.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Experimental | Other: Graded Motor Imagery (GMI) training, Other: Conventional Physiotherapy, Other: Home Exercise ProgramStudy group: "Graded Motor Imagery Training + Conventional Physiotherapy" In this group, each participant will be received a treatment protocol consisting of Graded Motor Imagery training, conventional physiotherapy, and home exercises. * Graded Motor Imagery (GMI) * Conventional Physiotherapy Program * Home Exercise Program |
| Group 2 | Active comparator | Other: Conventional Physiotherapy, Other: Home Exercise ProgramControl group: "Conventional Physiotherapy" In this group, each participant will be received a treatment protocol consisting of conventional physiotherapy, and home exercises. * Conventional Physiotherapy Program * Home Exercise Program |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 25 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Aged between 25-65 years old,
- Having been diagnosed with Shoulder Impingement Syndrome by physical examination and MRI as a result of shoulder pain lasting at least 3 months,
- Presence of a painful arc between 60° and 120° in shoulder flexion / abduction (elevation) movements,
- The Standardized Mini Mental Test result must be at least 24 points,
- Not having seen imagery practice before,
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Having severe mental and communication problems,
- Having undergone surgical treatment on the same upper extremity,
- Presence of acute trauma, peripheral nervous system lesion, fracture or complete tendon rupture in the affected shoulder,
- Presence of other pathologies such as adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder joint complex and glenohumeral instability,
- Presence of radiotherapy history on the same side as the affected shoulder,
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Graded Motor Imagery (GMI) trainingGMI consists of three basic components: 1. Left / Right Discrimination training (Lateralization training): For lateralization training, patients will be trained by asking them to distinguish between right and left with images taken at various angles and positions in the RecogniseTM (NOI-Australia) applications (shoulder and hand sections) (In weeks 1 and 2). 2. Motor Imagery (Explicit Motor Imagery): At this stage, the participant will be asked to imagine doing various functional activities (brushing teeth, combing hair, etc.) in the position they feel most comfortable in and in a quiet environment (In weeks 2 and 3). 3. Mirror Therapy (providing visual feedback through a mirror): In this phase, active ROM exercises and progressive resistance exercises with simultaneous movement of the affected and unaffected extremities will be applied using a standard size posture mirror (In weeks 3-6). This program will be applied for 6 weeks (3 sessions per week). | Other | Group 1 |
| Conventional PhysiotherapyConventional physiotherapy program includes passive, active-assistive (wand exercises) and active ROM exercises for shoulder joint, passive / active posterior and anterior capsule stretching exercises, superior-inferior, mediolateral and distraction techniques for scapular mobilization exercises, shoulder flexion, abduction, internal and external rotation muscles strengthening exercises, static and dynamic stabilization exercises for proprioception exercises. To reduce the pain that may occur after exercises, cold application and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) will be applied to benefit from their analgesic effects. Cold application will be applied around the shoulder using a coldpack (gel pack) cold therapy for 15 minutes. Conventional TENS application around shoulder will be performed using a TENS device and four separate 2 × 2 inch self-adhesive electrodes for 15 minutes.This program will be applied for 6 weeks (3 sessions per week). | Other | Group 1, Group 2 |
| Home Exercise ProgramThe home exercises program includes shoulder jonit active ROM exercises, active posterior and anterior shoulder capsule stretching exercises, shoulder flexion, abduction, internal and external rotation muscles strengthening exercises, shoulder proprioception exercises, and cold therapy. This program will be applied for 6 weeks (3 sessions per week). | Other | Group 1, Group 2 |
Primary outcome
Pain intensity
Time frame: Baseline, Interim evaluation (At the end of the 3rd week), After the six-week intervention, After six-weeks of follow-up
Pain intensity will be assessed with Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is usually a horizontal line, 10 cm in length, anchored by word descriptors at each end with "No Pain" (score of zero) on the left side up to "pain as bad as it could be" or the "worst imaginable pain" (Score of 100 [100-mm scale]) on the right side.The patient will be asked to mark the line point that represented his or her current pain.
Functional Status
Time frame: Baseline, Interim evaluation (At the end of the 3rd week), After the six-week intervention, After six-weeks of follow-up
The disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire will be used in shoulder functional status evaluation. The DASH consists mainly of a 30-item disability/symptom scale, scored 0 (no disability) to 100. 21 of the questions of the survey question the ability to perform functional activities, 5 question the pain, and 4 question the psychosocial effects of the disease. Each question is scored using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5 (1: no difficulty, 2: mild difficulty, 3: moderate difficulty, 4: extreme difficulty, 5: not at all). Higher scores indicate better functional status.
6 secondary outcomes
Active Range Of Motion (AROM)
Time frame: Baseline, After the six-week intervention, After six-weeks of follow-up
Isometric Muscle Strength
Time frame: Baseline, After the six-week intervention, After six-weeks of follow-up
Functional Status Of the Hand
Time frame: Baseline, After the six-week intervention, After six-weeks of follow-up
Left/right discrimination (Lateralization)
Time frame: Baseline, After the six-week intervention, After six-weeks of follow-up
Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire (KVIQ)
Time frame: Baseline, After the six-week intervention, After six-weeks of follow-up
Global Rating of Change scale (Patient Satisfaction)
Time frame: After the six-week intervention
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Jun 2024.
- Background: PubMed 32003812Araya-Quintanilla F, Gutierrez-Espinoza H, Jesus Munoz-Yanez M, Rubio-Oyarzun D, Cavero-Redondo I, Martinez-Vizcaino V, Alvarez-Bueno C. The Short-term Effect of Graded Motor Imagery on the Affective Components of Pain in Subjects with Chronic Shoulder Pain Syndrome: Open-Label Single-Arm Prospective Study. Pain Med. 2020 Oct 1;21(10):2496-2501. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz364.
- Background: PubMed 29257926Sawyer EE, McDevitt AW, Louw A, Puentedura EJ, Mintken PE. Use of Pain Neuroscience Education, Tactile Discrimination, and Graded Motor Imagery in an Individual With Frozen Shoulder. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018 Mar;48(3):174-184. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2018.7716. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
- Background: PubMed 28483657Louw A, Puentedura EJ, Reese D, Parker P, Miller T, Mintken PE. Immediate Effects of Mirror Therapy in Patients With Shoulder Pain and Decreased Range of Motion. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Oct;98(10):1941-1947. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.03.031. Epub 2017 May 5.
- Background: PubMed 17082465Moseley GL. Graded motor imagery for pathologic pain: a randomized controlled trial. Neurology. 2006 Dec 26;67(12):2129-34. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000249112.56935.32. Epub 2006 Nov 2.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Shoulder Impingement Syndrome
Not yet recruiting
TECAR With Shoulder Chronic Shoulder Impingement Syndrome
Shoulder Impingement Syndrome
Recruiting
Device-Assisted Balance Training for People With Shoulder Impingement
Shoulder
Not yet recruiting
"Effectiveness of a Telerehabilitation Program Versus a Conventional Rehabilitation Program in Patients With Subacromial Pain"
Subacromial Impingement Syndrome
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Natural History of Shoulder Pathology in Manual Wheelchair Users
Paraplegia, Spinal Cord Injuries
Not yet recruiting
Spencer vs Positional Release Techniques for Chronic Subacromial Impingement
Chronic Subacromial Impingement Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
MASOUD AMIR RASHEDI BONAB, PhD principal investigator
Marmara University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Graded Motor Imagery (GMI) training, Conventional Physiotherapy and Home Exercise Program in people with Shoulder Impingement Syndrome and Pain, run by Marmara University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain intensity (time frame: Baseline, Interim evaluation (At the end of the 3rd week), After the six-week intervention, After six-weeks of follow-up). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06081088, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jun 2024.