Acute Postoperative PainCRISPPNCT06088602
Cryoneurolysis for Acute Postoperative Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty
A study testing Cryoneurolysis in people with Acute Postoperative Pain, run by Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
Cryoneurolysis is a regional anaesthetic technique that works by freezing peripheral sensory nerves. This technique can potentially provide analgesia after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the technique is expensive and comprehensive. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Postoperative Pain
- What is being tested?
- Cryoneurolysis
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 44 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- 19 Mar 2024to Oct 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 18
- Primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty
- Ability to participate in the study (understand written and spoken Danish language, self-reported pain and satisfaction)
- Signed written informed consent form
- Pain (VAS 0-100 mm) ≥ 45 during a 5-meter walk test at 24 h (20-28h) postoperatively
Who cannot join
- Ongoing treatment of systemic glucocorticoids or other immunosuppressant treatment apart from inhaled steroids
- Insulin-dependent diabetes
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
- Mental disability that could impair a patient's decision-making capability of giving informed consent and not enabling valid data collection.
- Patients with known diagnoses of schizophrenia, ongoing psychosis, bipolar disease and/or a history of ongoing anti-psychotic treatment.
- Patients with modulated pain-reception (experience) based on other diseases or injuries, e.g. spinal cord or brain injury, severe polyneuropathies or neurologic disorders.
Show all 11Show fewer
- Posttraumatic osteoarthritis as reason for total knee arthroplasty
- Bleeding disorder
- Localized infection in the treatment area
- Cryoglobulinemia, cold urticaria, paroxysmal cold haemoglobinuria, or Raynaud's syndrome
- Perioperative peripheral nerve block
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Denmark1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Hvidovre Hospital
Hvidovre, 2650
Anders H Springborg, MD, 26815919, andersspringborg@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Cryoneurolysis for the Treatment of Acute Postoperative Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty in High Pain Responders - A Randomized, Participant- and Observer-masked, Sham-controlled Trial
Cryoneurolysis is a regional anaesthetic technique that works by freezing peripheral sensory nerves. This technique can potentially provide analgesia after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the technique is expensive and comprehensive. Pain 24 hours after surgery is associated with high amounts of late acute pain. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to compare the effect of postoperative cryoanalgesia with a sham treatment on acute postoperative pain in TKA patients with moderate to severe pain on the first postoperative day. The cryoanalgesia treatment will be performed 24 hours after surgery. Afterward, the patients will be followed for 24 weeks to determine the level of pain among other outcomes.
Read the detailed description
Background Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a frequently performed procedure and is expected to increase in numbers due to the aging population and growing obesity rates. Fast-track regimes with multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia have improved postoperative outcomes. However, a subset of patients still experiences unsatisfactory levels of postoperative pain in the weeks following surgery, potentially delaying mobilization and recovery as well as increasing the need for opioid analgesics. Current recommendations for pain management following TKA according to the Procedure Specific Postoperative Pain Management (PROSPECT) Working Group include paracetamol, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), glucocorticoids, local infiltration analgesia, and single shot adductor canal block (ACB). However, the role of ACBs for pain after TKA has been under extensive debate in recent years. While an ACB may provide some pain relief, the duration of pain control is usually less than 24 h and the effect on length of stay (LOS) and opioid consumption is questionable.
In the past decades, cryoneurolysis has been used to treat acute pain following herniorrhaphy, tonsillectomy, and thoracotomy via the surgical incision. The emergence of percutaneous cryoprobes and the use of ultra-sound guided techniques has allowed for an increase in potential applications. Recently, the use of cryoneurolysis has gained attention as a potential regional anesthetic technique for the treatment of knee pain. Cryoneurolysis works by freezing peripheral nerves with temperatures in the range of -20⁰C to -100⁰C, causing a Wallerian degeneration of nerve axons distal to the treatment site. This process involves loss of the relative continuity of the axon and its covering of myelin but with a preservation of the surrounding endo-, peri-, and epineurium, thus allowing normal axonal regeneration and remyelination. Axons regenerate at a rate of 1-2 mm/day. Thus, resulting in a nerve block that typically will resolve with full recovery within weeks to months depending on the site of treatment.
The effect of cryoneurolysis on knee pain has been documented in a few studies. A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial found that cryoneurolysis reduced symptoms of knee osteoarthritis for up to 150 days. A retrospective chart-review of 100 patients undergoing TKA found that cryoneurolysis significantly lowered LOS, reduced opioid consumption until 12 weeks after surgery, and reduced pain at the 2- and 6-weeks follow-up. Another retrospective analysis in 267 patients undergoing TKA found a comparable reduction in opioid requirements, pain, and LOS in patients treated with cryoneurolysis compared with historic controls. A recent RCT comparing cryoneurolysis to standard of care in 124 patients undergoing TKA found that cryoneurolysis reduced opioid consumption at 72 h, 6 weeks and 12-week follow-ups.
Although these findings are promising, cryoneurolysis is expensive and comprehensive, and might not be relevant in all patients receiving multimodal analgesia with COX-2 inhibitors, paracetamol, local infiltration analgesia, and high-dose steroid in a fully implemented enhanced recovery program. Several risk factors have been associated with a high pain response including age, gender, preoperative pain, psychological profile, and quantitative sensory testing (QST). However, when including postoperative pain in the prediction of acute pain, movement-evoked pain 24 h postoperatively is the best predictor for pain the week following surgery.
Using postoperative pain 24 h after surgery as a predictor of a sustained high pain response, we hypothesized that postoperative cryoanalgesia compared to a local anesthesia (LA) block with sham cryo treatment would reduce pain in patients with moderate to severe pain following TKA 2-7 days after surgery.
Aim To compare the effect of postoperative cryoanalgesia with a sham treatment consisting of LA block only on postoperative pain in the first week after surgery in TKA patients with moderate to severe pain on the first postoperative day.
Study plan In the outpatient clinic, the screening procedure will be performed among patients planned for TKA by the surgeons. Patients will be asked by orthopedic staff whether they may be contacted regarding the research project. The research staff will then contact potential patients either in person or via telephone. The written study information will be explained - either at the outpatient clinic or via telephone by the investigator.
All patients receive both spoken and written information. Information is given in a separate closed room without interruptions. All patients are given the chance of an additional meeting with the chance of bringing a relative. All patients must give a signed informed consent on paper prior to inclusion to participate in the study. The patient will sign the consent form on day 1 after surgery.
Perioperative treatment The pre-, intra-, and postoperative treatment-course follows the local operating procedures and common clinical guidelines implemented at the Dept. of Orthopedic Surgery, Hvidovre Hospital.
Preoperative standard treatment Preoperatively, the patient is examined by a specialized arthroplasty surgeon, and a basic preoperative health examination is done, along with a specialized anesthesiologic assessment planning the anesthesia for the TKA operation.
On the morning of surgery the patient will be given:
Celebra 400 mg Paracetamol 1 g
Anesthesia All included patients will receive general anesthesia or a neuraxial blockade in the form of a spinal anesthesia administered at level L2-L4, by injecting 2-3 ml of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5%. If spinal anesthesia is performed, perioperative sedation with propofol or other sedatives is optional and done in agreement with the patient. According to local guidelines, dexamethasone 0.3 mg/kg or 1 mg/kg IV rounded up to nearest 10 mg will be administered prior to surgery to patients with a pain catastrophizing scale score ≤ 20 or > 20, respectively. A supplement of local infiltration analgesia is administered directly into the surrounding tissue of the knee at the end of surgery, according to local operating procedure.
Tranexamic acid is administered as 1 g preoperatively, 1 g 3 h postoperatively, and 1 g in the surgical ward according to local operating procedure to prevent bleeding.
Surgical procedure A medial parapatellar approach will be used. No tourniquet is used. Following insertion of the prosthesis, local infiltration analgesia (LIA) with 200 mL 0.2% Ropivacaine will be injected in the posterior capsule, periarticular tissues and subcutaneous tissue. Joint capsule, subcutis and skin are closed with standard 3-layer closure and a compression bandage is applied. No drains are used. All patient will be operated with cemented components and patella resurfacing.
Standard postoperative treatment
The postoperative multimodal analgesic regimen consists of:
Celebra 200 mg x 2, for 7 days. Paracetamol 1 g x 4, for 7 days. Morphine 10-20 mg or opioid equivalents administered only as rescue opioids.
Intervention The intervention will take place after the inclusion at 20-32 h after TKA surgery. The procedure will be performed at the Dept. of Anesthesiology.
Cryoneurolysis mechanism of action Cryoneurolysis will be performed on the superficial genicular nerves (Cryo-S, Metrum Cryoflex, Blizne Laszczynskiego, Poland). The cryoprobe works by passing carbon dioxide at a relatively high pressure down the shaft, through a small orifice and into a closed tip at a much lower pressure. According to the Joule-Thomson effect, this drop in pressure causes a dramatic decrease in temperature which leads to a rapid expansion and absorption of heat. Afterwards the gas moves back up through a larger diameter tube. Importantly, this closed loop allows no gas to escape into the surrounding tissue. The intense cold created (approximately -70⁰C) causes a Wallerian degeneration, thereby reversibly destroying the nerve axon with retention of the endo-, peri-, and epineurium. Since the architecture of the nerve remains intact, the nerve axon can grow out along its normal path which occurs with approximately 1-2 mm/day. The drop in temperature cannot be lower than the boiling point for the gas used, which for carbon dioxide is -79⁰C. Irreversible degeneration of nerve tissue occurs at about -100⁰C which allows for a wide safety margin.
Procedure technique
Cryo-group:
The patient is placed in a supine position with a sheet between the upper and lower part of the body, thus blinding the patient from the intervention allocation. The procedure is performed using a linear array ultrasound probe. Local anesthesia is injected in the skin. The superficial genicular nerves, more specifically the ISN and the AFCN, are visualized. A nerve stimulator (Stimuplex HNS 12, B Braun, Melsungen, Germany) is used to verify the visualized nerves., 2-3 ml of ropivacaine 5 mg/ml is injected around the nerves. After 5-15 minutes the effect is evaluated by assessing pain in the surgical area and asking the patient whether there is a pain relief. Following this evaluation, cryoneurolysis (Cryo-S, Metrum Cryoflex, Blizne Laszczynskiego, Poland) is performed unilaterally along a treatment line, the location of which was guided by visualization and palpation of anatomic landmarks. The ISN treatment line is located along the line that connects a point located 5 cm medial to the lower pole of the patella and a point located 5 cm medial to the tibial tubercle. The AFCN treatment line is located at one-third the length of the distance from the center of the patella to the top of the femur, with a width equal to the width of the patella.
Sham-group:
The exact same procedure as in the cryo-group is performed, except that the nerves are not frozen with the cryoneurolysis apparatus. Sound effects from the machine are replicated to give the patient the same experience as in the active intervention group.
Study specific assessments Pain is rated by the patient before the intervention, after the initial LA injection, at home on days 2-7 and at the 2-, 4-, 12-, and 24 weeks follow-up via telephone.
A Visual Analog Scale (VAS 0-100) is used. On days 1-7 patients mark their pain in the electronic CRF twice a day (Appendix 5). If the patient is not able to complete the ratings electronically, a physical pain diary will be provided. Pain is rated by the patient at rest, during a 5-meter walk test, and during sleep. At the hospital and at the follow-ups patients are asked to rate their pain at rest and during a 5-meter walk test.
Use of rescue-analgesics (opioids) or other specific pain-relieving actions that differ from standard treatment is noted in the CRF.
The presence of dysesthesia or other side effects will be evaluated at each follow-up.
Other clinical data collected
- Demographical data (gender, age, height, weight, co-morbidity, American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) score)
- Preoperative opioids/strong analgesics
- Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
- Surgical data (date of surgery, indication, surgical time, procedure information, intraoperative bleeding, transfusion data, perioperative analgesics)
- Type and dosage of analgesics.
- Deviations from standard treatment
- Quality of sleep, lethargy, dizziness, and nausea, pre- and postoperative registration, on a NRS (0-10)
- Adverse events throughout the hospitalization and at each follow-up
- Neuropathic Pain Scale for Postsurgical Patients (NeuPPS)
Data protection The study will be conducted according to the General Data Protection Regulation and The Data Protection Act. All information will be treated confidentially, and all data will be pseudonymized with a code.
All research personnel are subject to professional secrecy. The investigators will keep an ID-list on all patients included in the study, containing full name, social security number and participant-ID.
A screening log is kept electronically in REDCap containing date of screening/surgery, age, reasons for not including in study on all patients screened for participation.
Collected data will be entered in the electronic CRF. This CRF and the EPJ will be made available for third parties in accordance with Danish Law. This means available for inspection by the Danish Medical Agency or other health authorities.
Patients will be informed that results will be stored and analyzed, and that anonymity will be respected. Data will always be stored in accordance with the regulations by DPA. Furthermore, participants will be informed of the possibility of inspection of the data from public authorities. Investigator ensures that the study follows the principles of Good Clinical Practice.
- Conditions
- Acute Postoperative Pain
- Being tested
- Cryoneurolysis, Sham
- Keywords
- Cryoanalgesia, Acute postoperative pain, Total knee arthroplasty
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Postoperative
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CryoneurolysisProcedure or surgery
Local anesthesia is injected in the skin. The superficial genicular nerves, more specifically the ISN and the AFCN, are visualized. A nerve stimulator is used to verify the visualized nerves., 2-3 ml of ropivacaine 5 mg/ml is injected around the nerves. After 5-15 minutes the effect is evaluated by assessing pain in the surgical area and asking the patient whether there is a pain relief. Following this evaluation, cryoneurolysis (Cryo-S, Metrum Cryoflex, Blizne Laszczynskiego, Poland) is performed unilaterally along a treatment line, the location of which was guided by visualization and palpation of anatomic landmarks. The ISN treatment line is located along the line that connects a point located 5 cm medial to the lower pole of the patella and a point located 5 cm medial to the tibial tubercle. The AFCN treatment line is located at one-third the length of the distance from the center of the patella to the top of the femur, with a width equal to the width of the patella.
ShamProcedure or surgery
The exact same procedure as in the cryo-group is performed, except that the nerves are not frozen with the cryoneurolysis apparatus. Sound effects from the machine are replicated to give the patient the same experience as in the active intervention group.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cryo-group | Experimental | Postoperative cryoneurolysis of the superficial genicular nerves, i.e., the infrapatellar branches of the saphenous nerve (ISN) and the anterior femoral cutaneous nerve (AFCN). Receives: Procedure: Cryoneurolysis |
| Sham-group | Sham comparator | Postoperative sham cryoneurolysis of the lower extremity. Receives: Procedure: Sham |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cumulated pain during walking days 2-7
Cumulated pain (VAS 0-100 mm) upon ambulation in a 5-meter walk test on days 2-7 postoperatively after surgery.
Measured: Days 2-7 after surgery
Secondary outcomes (13)
Pain at follow-ups
Pain (VAS 0-100) during rest and during 5-meter walk test at the 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks follow-up
Measured: 2-24 weeks after surgery
Pain relief after block
Pain relief immediately following blockade evaluated as ΔVAS 0-100 during a 5-meter walk test before and after the blockade
Measured: 24 hours after surgery
Cumulated pain during rest and night days 2-7
Cumulated pain at rest and during night from days 2-7
Measured: Days 2-7 after surgery
Quality of sleep
Quality of sleep assessed by the patient on a scale of 0-10 from postoperative days 2-7
Measured: Days 2-7 after surgery
Dizziness
Dizziness assessed by the patient on a scale of 0-10 from postoperative days 2-7
Measured: Days 2-7 after surgery
Fatigue
Fatigue assessed by the patient on a scale of 0-10 from postoperative days 2-7
Measured: Days 2-7 after surgery
Nausea
Nausea assessed by the patient on a scale of 0-10 from postoperative days 2-7
Measured: Days 2-7 after surgery
Use of rescue analgesics
Cumulative use of rescue-analgesics from days 2-7, and at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks follow-up
Measured: 2 days to 24 weeks efter surgery
Oxford knee score
Oxford knee score at 12 weeks
Measured: 12 weeks after surgery
Length of stay in hospital
Length of stay in hospital, and reasons for prolonged stay (>1 postoperative day) registered as "Why still in hospital"
Measured: Up to 24 weeks
Reasons for re-admissions
Reasons for re-admissions within 12 weeks
Measured: 12 weeks
Morbidity
Morbidity assessed as new illnesses or complications (4-, 12-, and 24 weeks follow-up by Electronic Patient Journal (EPJ) or telephone)
Measured: 24 weeks after surgery
Mortality
Mortality (4-, 12-, and 24 weeks follow-up by Electronic Patient Journal (EPJ) or telephone)
Measured: 24 weeks after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Oct 2023
- Study start19 Mar 2024
- Primary completionJun 2025 (estimated)
- Study completionOct 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (33)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute Postoperative PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The patients will be randomized to 2 groups with 22 in each. Sham cryo (sham-group): Postoperative sham cryoneurolysis of the lower extremity. Cryoneurolysis (cryo-group): Postoperative cryoneurolysis of the superficial genicular nerves, i.e., the infrapatellar branches of the saphenous nerve (ISN) and the anterior femoral cutaneous nerve (AFCN).
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Anders Deichmann Springborg, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre
- Investigators
- Anders H Springborg, MD, Principal investigator, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06088602
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CryoTKA
- Acronym
- CRISPP
- Status last verified
- Jul 2024
- First submitted
- 6 Oct 2023
- Last updated
- 16 Jul 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Anonymized data from all participants will be made available upon request after the study is published.
Publications
Husted H, Lunn TH, Troelsen A, Gaarn-Larsen L, Kristensen BB, Kehlet H. Why still in hospital after fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty? Acta Orthop. 2011 Dec;82(6):679-84. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2011.636682. Epub 2011 Nov 9.
PubMed 22066560Khan RS, Ahmed K, Blakeway E, Skapinakis P, Nihoyannopoulos L, Macleod K, Sevdalis N, Ashrafian H, Platt M, Darzi A, Athanasiou T. Catastrophizing: a predictive factor for postoperative pain. Am J Surg. 2011 Jan;201(1):122-31. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.02.007. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
PubMed 20832052Andersen LO, Gaarn-Larsen L, Kristensen BB, Husted H, Otte KS, Kehlet H. Subacute pain and function after fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty. Anaesthesia. 2009 May;64(5):508-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05831.x.
PubMed 19413820Kehlet H, Joshi GP. The systematic review/meta-analysis epidemic: a tale of glucocorticoid therapy in total knee arthroplasty. Anaesthesia. 2020 Jul;75(7):856-860. doi: 10.1111/anae.14946. Epub 2019 Dec 4. No abstract available.
PubMed 31802486Callesen T, Bech K, Thorup J, Andersen J, Nielsen R, Roikjaer O, Kehlet H. Cryoanalgesia: effect on postherniorrhaphy pain. Anesth Analg. 1998 Oct;87(4):896-9. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199810000-00028.
PubMed 9768790Ip HY, Abrishami A, Peng PW, Wong J, Chung F. Predictors of postoperative pain and analgesic consumption: a qualitative systematic review. Anesthesiology. 2009 Sep;111(3):657-77. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181aae87a.
PubMed 19672167Werner MU, Mjobo HN, Nielsen PR, Rudin A. Prediction of postoperative pain: a systematic review of predictive experimental pain studies. Anesthesiology. 2010 Jun;112(6):1494-502. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181dcd5a0.
PubMed 20460988Barnard D. The effects of extreme cold on sensory nerves. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1980 May;62(3):180-7.
PubMed 7396346Mustola ST, Lempinen J, Saimanen E, Vilkko P. Efficacy of thoracic epidural analgesia with or without intercostal nerve cryoanalgesia for postthoracotomy pain. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Mar;91(3):869-73. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.11.014.
PubMed 21353017Urban JA, Dolesh K, Martin E. A Multimodal Pain Management Protocol Including Preoperative Cryoneurolysis for Total Knee Arthroplasty to Reduce Pain, Opioid Consumption, and Length of Stay. Arthroplast Today. 2021 Jul 12;10:87-92. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2021.06.008. eCollection 2021 Aug.
PubMed 34286056Ilfeld BM, Gabriel RA, Trescot AM. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous cryoneurolysis for treatment of acute pain: could cryoanalgesia replace continuous peripheral nerve blocks? Br J Anaesth. 2017 Oct 1;119(4):703-706. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex142. No abstract available.
PubMed 29121277Joshi GP, Stewart J, Kehlet H. Critical appraisal of randomised trials assessing regional analgesic interventions for knee arthroplasty: implications for postoperative pain guidelines development. Br J Anaesth. 2022 Aug;129(2):142-144. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.04.019. Epub 2022 May 24.
PubMed 35618537Lunn TH, Andersen LO, Kristensen BB, Husted H, Gaarn-Larsen L, Bandholm T, Ladelund S, Kehlet H. Effect of high-dose preoperative methylprednisolone on recovery after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Jan;110(1):66-73. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes345. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
PubMed 22986420Andersen KG, Christensen KB, Kehlet H, Bidstup PE. The Effect of Pain on Physical Functioning After Breast Cancer Treatment: Development and Validation of an Assessment Tool. Clin J Pain. 2015 Sep;31(9):794-802. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000156.
PubMed 25679946Riddle DL, Wade JB, Jiranek WA, Kong X. Preoperative pain catastrophizing predicts pain outcome after knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Mar;468(3):798-806. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0963-y. Epub 2009 Jul 8.
PubMed 19585177
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Jul 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Cryoneurolysis for the Treatment of Acute Postoperative Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty in High Pain Responders - A Randomized, Participant- and Observer-masked, Sham-controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06088602
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CRISPP / CryoTKA
- Conditions
- Acute Postoperative Pain
- Keywords
- Cryoanalgesia, Acute postoperative pain, Total knee arthroplasty
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Copenhagen University Hospital, HvidovreUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
- Study start
- 19 Mar 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Oct 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Cryoneurolysis is a regional anaesthetic technique that works by freezing peripheral sensory nerves. This technique can potentially provide analgesia after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the technique is expensive and comprehensive. Pain 24 hours after surgery is associated with high amounts of late acute pain. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to compare the effect of postoperative cryoanalgesia with a sham treatment on acute postoperative pain in TKA patients with moderate to severe pain on the first postoperative day. The cryoanalgesia treatment will be performed 24 hours after surgery. Afterward, the patients will be followed for 24 weeks to determine the level of pain among other outcomes.
Detailed description
Background Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a frequently performed procedure and is expected to increase in numbers due to the aging population and growing obesity rates. Fast-track regimes with multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia have improved postoperative outcomes. However, a subset of patients still experiences unsatisfactory levels of postoperative pain in the weeks following surgery, potentially delaying mobilization and recovery as well as increasing the need for opioid analgesics. Current recommendations for pain management following TKA according to the Procedure Specific Postoperative Pain Management (PROSPECT) Working Group include paracetamol, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), glucocorticoids, local infiltration analgesia, and single shot adductor canal block (ACB). However, the role of ACBs for pain after TKA has been under extensive debate in recent years. While an ACB may provide some pain relief, the duration of pain control is usually less than 24 h and the effect on length of stay (LOS) and opioid consumption is questionable.
In the past decades, cryoneurolysis has been used to treat acute pain following herniorrhaphy, tonsillectomy, and thoracotomy via the surgical incision. The emergence of percutaneous cryoprobes and the use of ultra-sound guided techniques has allowed for an increase in potential applications. Recently, the use of cryoneurolysis has gained attention as a potential regional anesthetic technique for the treatment of knee pain. Cryoneurolysis works by freezing peripheral nerves with temperatures in the range of -20⁰C to -100⁰C, causing a Wallerian degeneration of nerve axons distal to the treatment site. This process involves loss of the relative continuity of the axon and its covering of myelin but with a preservation of the surrounding endo-, peri-, and epineurium, thus allowing normal axonal regeneration and remyelination. Axons regenerate at a rate of 1-2 mm/day. Thus, resulting in a nerve block that typically will resolve with full recovery within weeks to months depending on the site of treatment.
The effect of cryoneurolysis on knee pain has been documented in a few studies. A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial found that cryoneurolysis reduced symptoms of knee osteoarthritis for up to 150 days. A retrospective chart-review of 100 patients undergoing TKA found that cryoneurolysis significantly lowered LOS, reduced opioid consumption until 12 weeks after surgery, and reduced pain at the 2- and 6-weeks follow-up. Another retrospective analysis in 267 patients undergoing TKA found a comparable reduction in opioid requirements, pain, and LOS in patients treated with cryoneurolysis compared with historic controls. A recent RCT comparing cryoneurolysis to standard of care in 124 patients undergoing TKA found that cryoneurolysis reduced opioid consumption at 72 h, 6 weeks and 12-week follow-ups.
Although these findings are promising, cryoneurolysis is expensive and comprehensive, and might not be relevant in all patients receiving multimodal analgesia with COX-2 inhibitors, paracetamol, local infiltration analgesia, and high-dose steroid in a fully implemented enhanced recovery program. Several risk factors have been associated with a high pain response including age, gender, preoperative pain, psychological profile, and quantitative sensory testing (QST). However, when including postoperative pain in the prediction of acute pain, movement-evoked pain 24 h postoperatively is the best predictor for pain the week following surgery.
Using postoperative pain 24 h after surgery as a predictor of a sustained high pain response, we hypothesized that postoperative cryoanalgesia compared to a local anesthesia (LA) block with sham cryo treatment would reduce pain in patients with moderate to severe pain following TKA 2-7 days after surgery.
Aim To compare the effect of postoperative cryoanalgesia with a sham treatment consisting of LA block only on postoperative pain in the first week after surgery in TKA patients with moderate to severe pain on the first postoperative day.
Study plan In the outpatient clinic, the screening procedure will be performed among patients planned for TKA by the surgeons. Patients will be asked by orthopedic staff whether they may be contacted regarding the research project. The research staff will then contact potential patients either in person or via telephone. The written study information will be explained - either at the outpatient clinic or via telephone by the investigator.
All patients receive both spoken and written information. Information is given in a separate closed room without interruptions. All patients are given the chance of an additional meeting with the chance of bringing a relative. All patients must give a signed informed consent on paper prior to inclusion to participate in the study. The patient will sign the consent form on day 1 after surgery.
Perioperative treatment The pre-, intra-, and postoperative treatment-course follows the local operating procedures and common clinical guidelines implemented at the Dept. of Orthopedic Surgery, Hvidovre Hospital.
Preoperative standard treatment Preoperatively, the patient is examined by a specialized arthroplasty surgeon, and a basic preoperative health examination is done, along with a specialized anesthesiologic assessment planning the anesthesia for the TKA operation.
On the morning of surgery the patient will be given:
Celebra 400 mg Paracetamol 1 g
Anesthesia All included patients will receive general anesthesia or a neuraxial blockade in the form of a spinal anesthesia administered at level L2-L4, by injecting 2-3 ml of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5%. If spinal anesthesia is performed, perioperative sedation with propofol or other sedatives is optional and done in agreement with the patient. According to local guidelines, dexamethasone 0.3 mg/kg or 1 mg/kg IV rounded up to nearest 10 mg will be administered prior to surgery to patients with a pain catastrophizing scale score ≤ 20 or > 20, respectively. A supplement of local infiltration analgesia is administered directly into the surrounding tissue of the knee at the end of surgery, according to local operating procedure.
Tranexamic acid is administered as 1 g preoperatively, 1 g 3 h postoperatively, and 1 g in the surgical ward according to local operating procedure to prevent bleeding.
Surgical procedure A medial parapatellar approach will be used. No tourniquet is used. Following insertion of the prosthesis, local infiltration analgesia (LIA) with 200 mL 0.2% Ropivacaine will be injected in the posterior capsule, periarticular tissues and subcutaneous tissue. Joint capsule, subcutis and skin are closed with standard 3-layer closure and a compression bandage is applied. No drains are used. All patient will be operated with cemented components and patella resurfacing.
Standard postoperative treatment
The postoperative multimodal analgesic regimen consists of:
Celebra 200 mg x 2, for 7 days. Paracetamol 1 g x 4, for 7 days. Morphine 10-20 mg or opioid equivalents administered only as rescue opioids.
Intervention The intervention will take place after the inclusion at 20-32 h after TKA surgery. The procedure will be performed at the Dept. of Anesthesiology.
Cryoneurolysis mechanism of action Cryoneurolysis will be performed on the superficial genicular nerves (Cryo-S, Metrum Cryoflex, Blizne Laszczynskiego, Poland). The cryoprobe works by passing carbon dioxide at a relatively high pressure down the shaft, through a small orifice and into a closed tip at a much lower pressure. According to the Joule-Thomson effect, this drop in pressure causes a dramatic decrease in temperature which leads to a rapid expansion and absorption of heat. Afterwards the gas moves back up through a larger diameter tube. Importantly, this closed loop allows no gas to escape into the surrounding tissue. The intense cold created (approximately -70⁰C) causes a Wallerian degeneration, thereby reversibly destroying the nerve axon with retention of the endo-, peri-, and epineurium. Since the architecture of the nerve remains intact, the nerve axon can grow out along its normal path which occurs with approximately 1-2 mm/day. The drop in temperature cannot be lower than the boiling point for the gas used, which for carbon dioxide is -79⁰C. Irreversible degeneration of nerve tissue occurs at about -100⁰C which allows for a wide safety margin.
Procedure technique
Cryo-group:
The patient is placed in a supine position with a sheet between the upper and lower part of the body, thus blinding the patient from the intervention allocation. The procedure is performed using a linear array ultrasound probe. Local anesthesia is injected in the skin. The superficial genicular nerves, more specifically the ISN and the AFCN, are visualized. A nerve stimulator (Stimuplex HNS 12, B Braun, Melsungen, Germany) is used to verify the visualized nerves., 2-3 ml of ropivacaine 5 mg/ml is injected around the nerves. After 5-15 minutes the effect is evaluated by assessing pain in the surgical area and asking the patient whether there is a pain relief. Following this evaluation, cryoneurolysis (Cryo-S, Metrum Cryoflex, Blizne Laszczynskiego, Poland) is performed unilaterally along a treatment line, the location of which was guided by visualization and palpation of anatomic landmarks. The ISN treatment line is located along the line that connects a point located 5 cm medial to the lower pole of the patella and a point located 5 cm medial to the tibial tubercle. The AFCN treatment line is located at one-third the length of the distance from the center of the patella to the top of the femur, with a width equal to the width of the patella.
Sham-group:
The exact same procedure as in the cryo-group is performed, except that the nerves are not frozen with the cryoneurolysis apparatus. Sound effects from the machine are replicated to give the patient the same experience as in the active intervention group.
Study specific assessments Pain is rated by the patient before the intervention, after the initial LA injection, at home on days 2-7 and at the 2-, 4-, 12-, and 24 weeks follow-up via telephone.
A Visual Analog Scale (VAS 0-100) is used. On days 1-7 patients mark their pain in the electronic CRF twice a day (Appendix 5). If the patient is not able to complete the ratings electronically, a physical pain diary will be provided. Pain is rated by the patient at rest, during a 5-meter walk test, and during sleep. At the hospital and at the follow-ups patients are asked to rate their pain at rest and during a 5-meter walk test.
Use of rescue-analgesics (opioids) or other specific pain-relieving actions that differ from standard treatment is noted in the CRF.
The presence of dysesthesia or other side effects will be evaluated at each follow-up.
Other clinical data collected
- Demographical data (gender, age, height, weight, co-morbidity, American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) score)
- Preoperative opioids/strong analgesics
- Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
- Surgical data (date of surgery, indication, surgical time, procedure information, intraoperative bleeding, transfusion data, perioperative analgesics)
- Type and dosage of analgesics.
- Deviations from standard treatment
- Quality of sleep, lethargy, dizziness, and nausea, pre- and postoperative registration, on a NRS (0-10)
- Adverse events throughout the hospitalization and at each follow-up
- Neuropathic Pain Scale for Postsurgical Patients (NeuPPS)
Data protection The study will be conducted according to the General Data Protection Regulation and The Data Protection Act. All information will be treated confidentially, and all data will be pseudonymized with a code.
All research personnel are subject to professional secrecy. The investigators will keep an ID-list on all patients included in the study, containing full name, social security number and participant-ID.
A screening log is kept electronically in REDCap containing date of screening/surgery, age, reasons for not including in study on all patients screened for participation.
Collected data will be entered in the electronic CRF. This CRF and the EPJ will be made available for third parties in accordance with Danish Law. This means available for inspection by the Danish Medical Agency or other health authorities.
Patients will be informed that results will be stored and analyzed, and that anonymity will be respected. Data will always be stored in accordance with the regulations by DPA. Furthermore, participants will be informed of the possibility of inspection of the data from public authorities. Investigator ensures that the study follows the principles of Good Clinical Practice.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The patients will be randomized to 2 groups with 22 in each. Sham cryo (sham-group): Postoperative sham cryoneurolysis of the lower extremity. Cryoneurolysis (cryo-group): Postoperative cryoneurolysis of the superficial genicular nerves, i.e., the infrapatellar branches of the saphenous nerve (ISN) and the anterior femoral cutaneous nerve (AFCN).
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cryo-group | Experimental | Procedure: CryoneurolysisPostoperative cryoneurolysis of the superficial genicular nerves, i.e., the infrapatellar branches of the saphenous nerve (ISN) and the anterior femoral cutaneous nerve (AFCN). |
| Sham-group | Sham comparator | Procedure: ShamPostoperative sham cryoneurolysis of the lower extremity. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age ≥ 18
- Primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty
- Ability to participate in the study (understand written and spoken Danish language, self-reported pain and satisfaction)
- Signed written informed consent form
- Pain (VAS 0-100 mm) ≥ 45 during a 5-meter walk test at 24 h (20-28h) postoperatively
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Ongoing treatment of systemic glucocorticoids or other immunosuppressant treatment apart from inhaled steroids
- Insulin-dependent diabetes
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
- Mental disability that could impair a patient's decision-making capability of giving informed consent and not enabling valid data collection.
- Patients with known diagnoses of schizophrenia, ongoing psychosis, bipolar disease and/or a history of ongoing anti-psychotic treatment.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CryoneurolysisLocal anesthesia is injected in the skin. The superficial genicular nerves, more specifically the ISN and the AFCN, are visualized. A nerve stimulator is used to verify the visualized nerves., 2-3 ml of ropivacaine 5 mg/ml is injected around the nerves. After 5-15 minutes the effect is evaluated by assessing pain in the surgical area and asking the patient whether there is a pain relief. Following this evaluation, cryoneurolysis (Cryo-S, Metrum Cryoflex, Blizne Laszczynskiego, Poland) is performed unilaterally along a treatment line, the location of which was guided by visualization and palpation of anatomic landmarks. The ISN treatment line is located along the line that connects a point located 5 cm medial to the lower pole of the patella and a point located 5 cm medial to the tibial tubercle. The AFCN treatment line is located at one-third the length of the distance from the center of the patella to the top of the femur, with a width equal to the width of the patella. | Procedure or surgery | Cryo-group |
| ShamThe exact same procedure as in the cryo-group is performed, except that the nerves are not frozen with the cryoneurolysis apparatus. Sound effects from the machine are replicated to give the patient the same experience as in the active intervention group. | Procedure or surgery | Sham-group |
Primary outcome
Cumulated pain during walking days 2-7
Time frame: Days 2-7 after surgery
Cumulated pain (VAS 0-100 mm) upon ambulation in a 5-meter walk test on days 2-7 postoperatively after surgery.
13 secondary outcomes
Pain at follow-ups
Time frame: 2-24 weeks after surgery
Pain relief after block
Time frame: 24 hours after surgery
Cumulated pain during rest and night days 2-7
Time frame: Days 2-7 after surgery
Quality of sleep
Time frame: Days 2-7 after surgery
Dizziness
Time frame: Days 2-7 after surgery
Fatigue
Time frame: Days 2-7 after surgery
Nausea
Time frame: Days 2-7 after surgery
Use of rescue analgesics
Time frame: 2 days to 24 weeks efter surgery
Oxford knee score
Time frame: 12 weeks after surgery
Length of stay in hospital
Time frame: Up to 24 weeks
Reasons for re-admissions
Time frame: 12 weeks
Morbidity
Time frame: 24 weeks after surgery
Mortality
Time frame: 24 weeks after surgery
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Jul 2024.
- Background: PubMed 22066560Husted H, Lunn TH, Troelsen A, Gaarn-Larsen L, Kristensen BB, Kehlet H. Why still in hospital after fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty? Acta Orthop. 2011 Dec;82(6):679-84. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2011.636682. Epub 2011 Nov 9.
- Background: PubMed 20832052Khan RS, Ahmed K, Blakeway E, Skapinakis P, Nihoyannopoulos L, Macleod K, Sevdalis N, Ashrafian H, Platt M, Darzi A, Athanasiou T. Catastrophizing: a predictive factor for postoperative pain. Am J Surg. 2011 Jan;201(1):122-31. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.02.007. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
- Background: PubMed 19413820Andersen LO, Gaarn-Larsen L, Kristensen BB, Husted H, Otte KS, Kehlet H. Subacute pain and function after fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty. Anaesthesia. 2009 May;64(5):508-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05831.x.
- Background: PubMed 31802486Kehlet H, Joshi GP. The systematic review/meta-analysis epidemic: a tale of glucocorticoid therapy in total knee arthroplasty. Anaesthesia. 2020 Jul;75(7):856-860. doi: 10.1111/anae.14946. Epub 2019 Dec 4. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 9768790Callesen T, Bech K, Thorup J, Andersen J, Nielsen R, Roikjaer O, Kehlet H. Cryoanalgesia: effect on postherniorrhaphy pain. Anesth Analg. 1998 Oct;87(4):896-9. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199810000-00028.
- Background: PubMed 19672167Ip HY, Abrishami A, Peng PW, Wong J, Chung F. Predictors of postoperative pain and analgesic consumption: a qualitative systematic review. Anesthesiology. 2009 Sep;111(3):657-77. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181aae87a.
- Background: PubMed 20460988Werner MU, Mjobo HN, Nielsen PR, Rudin A. Prediction of postoperative pain: a systematic review of predictive experimental pain studies. Anesthesiology. 2010 Jun;112(6):1494-502. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181dcd5a0.
- Background: PubMed 7396346Barnard D. The effects of extreme cold on sensory nerves. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1980 May;62(3):180-7.
- Background: PubMed 21353017Mustola ST, Lempinen J, Saimanen E, Vilkko P. Efficacy of thoracic epidural analgesia with or without intercostal nerve cryoanalgesia for postthoracotomy pain. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Mar;91(3):869-73. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.11.014.
- Background: PubMed 34286056Urban JA, Dolesh K, Martin E. A Multimodal Pain Management Protocol Including Preoperative Cryoneurolysis for Total Knee Arthroplasty to Reduce Pain, Opioid Consumption, and Length of Stay. Arthroplast Today. 2021 Jul 12;10:87-92. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2021.06.008. eCollection 2021 Aug.
- Background: PubMed 29121277Ilfeld BM, Gabriel RA, Trescot AM. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous cryoneurolysis for treatment of acute pain: could cryoanalgesia replace continuous peripheral nerve blocks? Br J Anaesth. 2017 Oct 1;119(4):703-706. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex142. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 35618537Joshi GP, Stewart J, Kehlet H. Critical appraisal of randomised trials assessing regional analgesic interventions for knee arthroplasty: implications for postoperative pain guidelines development. Br J Anaesth. 2022 Aug;129(2):142-144. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.04.019. Epub 2022 May 24.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Anonymized data from all participants will be made available upon request after the study is published.
Related trials for Acute Postoperative Pain
RecruitingPhase 2
REctus Sheath Trial
Acute Pain, Postoperative Pain, Acute
Not yet recruiting
Post-operative Pain and Clinical Outcome After Single-cone Obturation With a Calcium Silicate-based Versus Epoxy Resin Sealer
Post Operative Pain, Acute, Irreversible Pulpitis (Toothache)
Not yet recruiting
Lumbar ESP Block Versus TAP Block for Postoperative Pain Control in Children Undergoing Open Inguinal Hernia Repair
Inguinal Hernia, Postoperative Pain
Recruiting
Ultrasound-Guided Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block for Analgesia in Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery
Postoperative Pain, Acute, Shoulder Pain
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Suzetrigine (Journavx) as Multimodal Therapy for Pain Management in Adults Undergoing Surgery for Hip Fracture
Hip Fractures (ICD-10 72.01-72.2), Post Operative Analgesia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Anders H Springborg, MD principal investigator
Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Cryoneurolysis in people with Acute Postoperative Pain, run by Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Anders H Springborg, MD (26815919, andersspringborg@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Cumulated pain during walking days 2-7 (time frame: Days 2-7 after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06088602, which also lists 33 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jul 2024.