Conduction System PacingSTIMU'HISNCT06088927
Long-term Outcomes of Conduction System Pacing: a National Multicenter Observational Study - NORMAND'HIS / STIMU'HIS
An observational study of Conduction System Pacing, run by University Hospital, Rouen at 10 sites in France.
Trial summary
This prospective multicenter registry will evaluate the long-term electrical, echocardiographic, and clinical outcomes of conduction system pacing (CSP). There is currently limited data in the literature regarding the long-term results and benefits of CSP. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Conduction System Pacing
- What is being tested?
- Conduction system pacing
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 2,500 participants
- Where
- 10 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2023to 31 Mar 2028
- How long will I take part?
- 2 Years
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: All patients referred for conduction system pacing
Who may be able to join
- Patient who had undergone conduction system pacing attempt
- Age > 18 yo
- Capacity to understand the nature of the study, legal ability and willingness to give informed consent
Who cannot join
- Patient under guardianship, trusteeship, or legal protection.
- Pregnant woman (positive urine pregnancy test) or breastfeeding or lack of proven effective contraception (according to the WHO definition) or menopausal without confirmed diagnosis (non-medically induced amenorrhea for at least 12 months before the inclusion visit).
Trial locations and contacts
10 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Frederic Anselme, MD, PhD contact
10 sites in 1 country
France10 sites, 10 recruiting
- Recruiting
CHU Caen
Caen
Pierre Ollitrault, MD
- Recruiting
CHI Elbeuf
Elbeuf
Fabian Tournevache, MD
- Recruiting
Groupe Hospitalier La Rochelle Ré-Aunis
La Rochelle
Antoine Milhem, MD
- Recruiting
CH Le Havre
Le Havre
Nathanaël Auquier, MD
- Recruiting
CHU Lille
Lille
Christelle Marquié, MD
- Recruiting
Hôpital Saint Philibert
Lomme
Guillaume Viart, MD
- Recruiting
CHU Rennes
Rennes
Vincent Galand, MD
- Recruiting
Rouen University Hospital
Rouen, 76 031
Corentin Chaumont, MD
- Recruiting
Clinique Saint Hilaire
Rouen
Adrian Mirolo, MD
- Recruiting
CHU Sud Réunion
Saint-Pierre
Gaël Clérici, MD
About this study
This prospective multicenter registry will evaluate the long-term electrical, echocardiographic, and clinical outcomes of conduction system pacing (CSP). There is currently limited data in the literature regarding the long-term results and benefits of CSP. The long-term maintenance of conduction system (His bundle or Left Bundle Branch) capture and physiological ventricular activation is an essential prerequisite for the expected benefits of this technique.
There is currently no prospective study evaluating the preservation of CSP during long-term follow-up. The design of the present study will allow reliable evaluation of CSP maintenance at 2 years follow-up. The prospective collection of electrical data (pacing thresholds, impedance, R wave sensing) during pacemaker follow-up visits will confirm thresholds stability over the long term. The incidence of atrial fibrillation episodes will also be precisely evaluated and will provide new information. Although pathophysiological studies have demonstrated less impairment of left atrial function with conduction system pacing, there is currently no data on the incidence of atrial fibrillation in patients implanted with a CSP pacemaker.
Echocardiographic data will be prospectively collected in order to analyse the evolution of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after CSP. This systematic follow-up is rarely found in CSP studies, often retrospective, with significant missing echocardiographic data. The hypothesis is that patients benefiting from CSP will not develop the deleterious effects demonstrated with conventional right ventricular pacing, such as left ventricular dilation and LVEF impairment. Inter- and intraventricular asynchrony criteria will also be systematically evaluated during follow-up echocardiography.Finally, this prospective cohort will also systematically collect clinical follow-up data (hospitalizations for heart failure and NYHA stage).
- Conditions
- Conduction System Pacing
- Being tested
- Conduction system pacing
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Conduction system pacingDevice
Conduction system pacing (His Bundle Pacing or Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing)
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Freedom from major adverse events
Major adverse events are defined as follow :
- Lead revision (including infection and pacing threshold increase)
- Lead dislodgment
- Loss of conduction system pacing (i.e. loss of His Bundle Pacing or Left Bundle Branch area pacing according to standard definitions)
- Heart Failure Hospitalization
- Upgrade to BiVentricular pacing
- All cause mortality
Measured: 24 months
Secondary outcomes (7)
LVEF (%)
Measured: 24 months
AF incidence
Measured: 24 months
Heart Failure Hospitalization Incidence
Measured: 24 months
CSP Threshold during pacemaker check (Volt @ ms)
Measured: 24 months
Paced QRS width
Measured: 24 months
Interventricular dyssynchrony parameters
Aortic pre-ejection time (ms) - Pulmonary pre-ejection time (ms) (echocardiography)
Measured: pre-discharged
Intraventricular dyssynchrony parameters
Difference between the first and last left ventricular systolic peak using 2D speckle tracking (echocardiography)
Measured: pre-discharged
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Oct 2023
- Study start1 Mar 2023
- Primary completion31 Mar 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Mar 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Conduction System PacingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, RouenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 2,500 participants (estimated)
- Target duration
- 2 Years
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Rouen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06088927
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2020/0417/OB
- Acronym
- STIMU'HIS
- Status last verified
- Mar 2023
- First submitted
- 12 May 2023
- Last updated
- 18 Oct 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Oct 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Long-term Outcomes of Conduction System Pacing: a National Multicenter Observational Study - NORMAND'HIS / STIMU'HIS
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06088927
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STIMU'HIS / 2020/0417/OB
- Conditions
- Conduction System Pacing
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 2,500 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, RouenUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This prospective multicenter registry will evaluate the long-term electrical, echocardiographic, and clinical outcomes of conduction system pacing (CSP). There is currently limited data in the literature regarding the long-term results and benefits of CSP. The long-term maintenance of conduction system (His bundle or Left Bundle Branch) capture and physiological ventricular activation is an essential prerequisite for the expected benefits of this technique.
There is currently no prospective study evaluating the preservation of CSP during long-term follow-up. The design of the present study will allow reliable evaluation of CSP maintenance at 2 years follow-up. The prospective collection of electrical data (pacing thresholds, impedance, R wave sensing) during pacemaker follow-up visits will confirm thresholds stability over the long term. The incidence of atrial fibrillation episodes will also be precisely evaluated and will provide new information. Although pathophysiological studies have demonstrated less impairment of left atrial function with conduction system pacing, there is currently no data on the incidence of atrial fibrillation in patients implanted with a CSP pacemaker.
Echocardiographic data will be prospectively collected in order to analyse the evolution of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after CSP. This systematic follow-up is rarely found in CSP studies, often retrospective, with significant missing echocardiographic data. The hypothesis is that patients benefiting from CSP will not develop the deleterious effects demonstrated with conventional right ventricular pacing, such as left ventricular dilation and LVEF impairment. Inter- and intraventricular asynchrony criteria will also be systematically evaluated during follow-up echocardiography.Finally, this prospective cohort will also systematically collect clinical follow-up data (hospitalizations for heart failure and NYHA stage).
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 2 Years
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All patients referred for conduction system pacing
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patient who had undergone conduction system pacing attempt
- Age > 18 yo
- Capacity to understand the nature of the study, legal ability and willingness to give informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patient under guardianship, trusteeship, or legal protection.
- Pregnant woman (positive urine pregnancy test) or breastfeeding or lack of proven effective contraception (according to the WHO definition) or menopausal without confirmed diagnosis (non-medically induced amenorrhea for at least 12 months before the inclusion visit).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Conduction system pacingConduction system pacing (His Bundle Pacing or Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing) | Device | – |
Primary outcome
Freedom from major adverse events
Time frame: 24 months
Major adverse events are defined as follow : * Lead revision (including infection and pacing threshold increase) * Lead dislodgment * Loss of conduction system pacing (i.e. loss of His Bundle Pacing or Left Bundle Branch area pacing according to standard definitions) * Heart Failure Hospitalization * Upgrade to BiVentricular pacing * All cause mortality
7 secondary outcomes
LVEF (%)
Time frame: 24 months
AF incidence
Time frame: 24 months
Heart Failure Hospitalization Incidence
Time frame: 24 months
CSP Threshold during pacemaker check (Volt @ ms)
Time frame: 24 months
Paced QRS width
Time frame: 24 months
Interventricular dyssynchrony parameters
Time frame: pre-discharged
Intraventricular dyssynchrony parameters
Time frame: pre-discharged
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Oct 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Conduction System Pacing
RecruitingObservational study
Leadless Pacemaker Registry: Outcomes and Follow-up From the University Hospital of St. Pölten
Pacemaker, Leadless Pacemaker
RecruitingObservational study
Product Performance Report: Evaluate Long-term Reliability & Performance of Medtronic Marketed Cardiac Therapy Products
Arrhythmia, Bradycardia
Recruiting
Safety and Effectiveness of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Versus Conventional Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Heart Failure
Heart Failure - NYHA II - IV
Not yet recruiting
LBBAP Versus ILR in Patients With New-Onset LBBB and Moderately Reduced LVEF After TAVI
TAVI(Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation), Left Bundle Branch Block
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Safety, Performance, and Clinical Benefit of Pacing the Left Bundle Branch Area - Post-Market Clinical Follow-up
Bradycardia, Atrioventricular Block
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Frederic Anselme, MD, PhD contact
10 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Conduction System Pacing, run by University Hospital, Rouen at 10 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Oct 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 10 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Corentin Chaumont, MD (+ 33637182032, corentin.chaumont@chu-rouen.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Freedom from major adverse events (time frame: 24 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Oct 2023.