Wellness, PsychologicalNCT06089447
A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial of Intervention for Children and Young People Experiencing Family Substance Use
A study testing A story based intervention called 'The Shadow of Tallystick Valley' in people with Wellness, Psychological, run by University of Surrey at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
The study is investigating the feasibility and acceptability of the story-based intervention, The Shadows of Tallystick Valley, aimed at improving the psychological wellbeing and resilience of children and young people who are affected by familial substance use. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 7 to 14 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Wellness, Psychological
- What is being tested?
- A story based intervention called 'The Shadow of Tallystick Valley'
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Oct 2024to Sep 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 7 to 14 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Aged between 7 - 14 years;
- Child: 7 - 10
- YP: 11 - 14
- Able to read age appropriate materials independently;
- Have someone in their family using alcohol and/or substances;
- Have received parental/caregiver consent to take part in the study;
- Have an assigned support worker
Who cannot join
- They are below age 7 years or above 14 years;
- They are currently engaging in self-harm, including all forms of self harm as set out by Mind (2020), and/or have plans to end their life;all forms of self harm
- Have not given consent to take part in the study;
- Have not received parent or caregiver consent to take part in the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site
University of Surrey
Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH
Cassie Dr Hazell, cassie.hazell@surrey.ac.uk
Sarah Dr Glew, s.glew@surrey.ac.uk
About this study
Official title: A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial of 'The Shadow of Tallystick Valley' for Children and Young People Experiencing Family Substance Use
The study is investigating the feasibility and acceptability of the story-based intervention, The Shadows of Tallystick Valley, aimed at improving the psychological wellbeing and resilience of children and young people who are affected by familial substance use. A secondary aim of the study is to identify whether there is a 'signal of efficacy'. The early intervention is a story and activity book designed and developed by Book of Beasties, in collaboration with the charity Change Grow Live (CGL), who work directly with children and young people experiencing familial substance use. The intervention is used by s at CGL with children and young people engaged with the service. In the present study, we aim to evaluate the story-based intervention within a pilot randomised controlled trial. Participants will be randomised to either receive the intervention or to join a waitlist for the same intervention. The effects of the story-based intervention will be assessed using pre and post psychological well-being and resilience measures, including KidCOPE, the Stirling Children's Wellbeing Scale and the Child and Youth Resilience Measure. The primary outcome measures are concerned with overall psychological wellbeing.
Read the detailed description
The aims of this pilot trial are as follows:
To determine whether a full trial is justified; To determine the feasibility and acceptability of the story-based intervention in improving psychological wellbeing and emotional literacy in children and young people experiencing familial substance use; To establish the effect size on the co-primary outcomes for a sample size calculation for a definitive trial.
To establish the feasibility of the intervention, we will collect data on the primary outcome for at least 80% of the recruitment target, and have an attrition rate that does not exceed 40%. A definitive trial will be justified if we are able to successfully recruit and retain participants in the trial, and if both the trial procedures and intervention are deemed to be acceptable to participants. Although the primary aim of pilot RCTs is to answer questions related to feasibility, an important secondary aim is to determine whether there is a signal of efficacy so as to inform the decision to progress to a definitive trial (Beets et al., 2021). The between-group effects will determine whether there is a signal of efficacy in favour of the Shadow of Tallystick Valley intervention and further support the need for a definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT). A signal of efficacy will be considered to be found if the between-group effect size on the co-primary outcomes is in favour of the intervention. Where these conditions are met, this study will therein provide the parameters needed to estimate the sample size for a definitive RCT. We will assess whether the study design is acceptable to participants using recruitment and retention rates (i.e., study and intervention uptake and dropout rates) and qualitative interviews with participants.
The intervention will be offered to children and young people already connected with CGL. Children and young people are referred to the service via a referral from an adult known to them. This can include (but is not limited to) family members, social workers, teachers, school staff, substances, or other youth worker professionals.
Recruitment methods:
Study advert and information pack will be shared by staff across the service with all children and young people who meet the inclusion criteria. If the child or young person wants to proceed, both they and their parent or caregiver must provide either written or verbal consent. Consent will be collected by the assigned support worker at Change Grow Live.
If in the instance a participant withdraws their consent, they will have two weeks after the intervention has been delivered to do so and relevant data will be removed and destroyed. Beyond the two week mark, the data will be written up. If a parent/ caregiver withdraws their consent, CGL would discuss the parents' concerns with them in the hope they can resolve them. If parents/caregiver consent is still withdrawn and the child is under 13, the participant will no longer be involved in the study and relevant data will be destroyed. If in the instance the parent/caregiver withdraws consent for a young person who is over 13 years of age and Gillick Competent, the young person will be able to continue in the study. This is inline with CGL's policy and procedures. If in the instance the parent / caregiver withdraws consent for a child below the age of 13 years, the child or young person will be withdrawn from the study.
The target sample size is based on guidelines by Whitehead et al. (2015) for a pilot trial prior to a main trial with 90% power and two-sided 5% significance expecting a small to medium effect size. We plan to recruit 25 participants per arm (50 in total).
Experimental Design
The present study is a single-blind external pilot randomised controlled trial with two parallel arms including optional qualitative feedback. Support Workers will children and young people (aged between 7 and 18 years). Interested participants will be given a participant information sheet. After reading the PIS, if potential participants are interested in participating in the trial, they will complete an eligibility assessment to determine whether they meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria. If the participant meets the eligibility criteria, they will be invited to complete a consent form. Prospective participants will not be able to progress in the trial without completing the consent statement.
Once participants have provided consent and consent has been given from parent/carer, participants will be allocated a unique ID code and asked to complete the baseline (T0) assessment. A file linking the participants' contact information with the unique IDs will be stored securely in a password-protected file in a OneDrive folder held on the University of Surrey's system. The PI will have the password for this file and give access to this to other members of the research team as needed. The password will not be shared outside of the research team. The T0 assessment can be completed either online or in person. There will be video instructions on how to complete the questionnaires for children and young people to then complete them independently. These videos will be produced after ethical approval so that the information conveyed is in line with the approved protocol and study materials. After the T0 assessment has been completed, participants will be randomly allocated to either receive the immediate intervention arm or a wait-list control group. The outcome of this randomisation will be emailed to the PI and will be logged in the secure, password protected file. The randomisation will be conducted using the simple randomisation function available from Sealed Envelope. Participants will not know which arm they have been allocated to. The support workers will deliver the intervention with the children and young people allocated to the control group of the study. They will have received at least one full day of training designed and delivered by CGL's National Hidden Head Lead. Participants will be contacted 18 weeks post-randomisation to complete the T1 assessment. The T1 assessment can be completed in person or online depending on participants preference. The T1 assessment will replicate the T0 assessment. After completing the T1 assessment, participants will be presented with an end of trial debrief statement.
Data Collection The trial will utilise a mixed methods approach, collecting both quantitative and qualitative data. The quantitative data will be collected at T0 and T1. The qualitative data will be collected from the intervention group in the form of written feedback form or an audio recording after the T1 assessment. Data collection should not involve contact with adults outside of CGL but must have independence to allow for adequate blinding. The data can be collected either online via Qualtrics or in hard copy. There is the potential to have video instructions on how to complete the questionnaires for children and young people to then complete them independently.
The main trial data will be entered into SPSS by the principal investigator. The items will be coded and scored in line with the original questionnaire protocols. A random selection of 20% of the data will be checked against the source (i.e. hard copies of questionnaires) to ensure data quality.
The Principal Investigator will act as the data custodian. The data will be owned by the lead organisation, the University of Surrey.
Data analysis All of the variables will be summarised using descriptive statistics by arm at each time point. We will calculate Cohen's d between-group effect sizes with 95% confidence intervals, comparing the T1 scores of the intervention versus control arms, adjusting effects for the baseline scores using an ANCOVA. The level of missing data for all outcome measures will be reported. As the present study is a pilot trial, we will not be testing any hypotheses and are instead testing evidence for a signal of efficacy in the desired direction.
The research process data will be used to understand the rates of recruitment and retention at all stages of the study. We will report the number of participants who completed and dropped out at each stage of the trial in the form of a CONSORT diagram. The quantitative adherence data will be the number of sessions completed with a child or young person and used to understand the degree of engagement with the intervention amongst participants. We will report the responses using descriptive statistics and describe any patterns that can be observed.
All of the data collected over the course of the study will be collected, stored and maintained in line with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) (Information Commissioner's Office, 2018) . Any hard copies will be scanned so as to become electronic documents. The hard copies will be destroyed. Electronic documents/data will all be stored within a University of Surrey OneDrive folder and protected with a password, accessed only by the research team. The PI will have all of the passwords and share these with members of the research team as needed. No one outside of the research team will have access to the passwords. The PI will assume responsibility for ensuring adherence to the data security protocol.
Data will be retained in accordance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) (Information Commissioner's Office, 2018) and (Medical Research Council, 2012) policies on data storage and archiving. Once the data analysis has been finalised, all anonymised data will be archived at the University of Surrey for up to 10 years. The anonymised data will be retained indefinitely by the PI.
Ethical considerations Consent to take part in this study will be informed. All participants and parents/carers of participants will be given the Participant Information Sheet (PIS) and will not be limited in terms of the amount of time they want to read through it. All participants will be told within the PIS and the consent forms that they can withdraw from the research study at any point. Participants will be asked to sign an item on the consent form that confirms that they are aware of their right to withdraw, and that they are not obligated to provide a reason for leaving the study.
All of the data collected within the research study will be treated as confidential. Identifiable data will not be shared outside of the research team. The study will comply with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and Data Protection Act 2018, which require data to be de-identified as soon as it is practical to do so. Participants will be identified on all documents (both hard copy and electronic) containing research data using a unique participant ID code. All documents will be stored securely and only accessible by the research team. The research team will safeguard the privacy of participants' data.
Participants will be informed within the PIS and consent form that anything they share over the course of the study will be treated as confidential, except for where this information puts themselves or other people at risk. Where confidentiality needs to be broken for safeguarding reasons, the information will only be shared with persons who have a responsibility to monitor and minimise this risk (e.g. s, personal tutors, university counselling team, local safeguarding authorities, mental health services). Participants will be asked to sign an item on the consent form that confirms that they understand our confidentiality policy.
Participants will be reimbursed for their time and effort at a rate of £5 for pre and £5 for post questionnaires completed (£10 in total) in the form of vouchers.
- Conditions
- Wellness, Psychological
- Being tested
- A story based intervention called 'The Shadow of Tallystick Valley'
- Medical subject headings
- Psychological Well-Being
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
A story based intervention called 'The Shadow of Tallystick Valley'Behavioural
'The Shadows of Tallystick Valley' is a story based intervention for CYP aged 7 - 14 years aimed at supporting the psychological wellbeing and resilience of those affected by familial substance misuse. It has been designed by Book of Beasties, a developer of games and educational content, in collaboration with the charity Change Grow Live, who support those experiencing substance misuse and CYP affected by familial substance misuse in the UK. The wellbeing resource harnesses protective factors, such as respectful and caring conversations with professionals (Wangansteen and Westby, 2019), to facilitate a safe and supportive environment aimed towards understanding the CYPs experience, support their psychological wellbeing and building resilience and coping skills. It uses fictional narratives, including characters that represent particular topics which act as drivers for engagement.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control Group | Experimental | Participants will receive the intervention immediately Receives: Behavioral: A story based intervention called 'The Shadow of Tallystick Valley' |
| Waitlist Group | Active comparator | Participants will be allocated to a waitlist group and will receive the intervention aft 6 months. Receives: Behavioral: A story based intervention called 'The Shadow of Tallystick Valley' |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Stirling Children's Wellbeing Scale (SCWBS)
The Stirling Children's Wellbeing Scale (SCWBS) (Liddle and Carter, 2015) is a 15-item questionnaire measuring wellbeing.
Measured: Two weeks
Secondary outcomes (2)
KidCOPE
Kidcope (Spirito et al., 1988) is a brief, clinical checklist designed to screen cognitive and behavioural coping in children and adolescents. The checklist covers problem-solving, distraction, social support, social withdrawal, cognitive restructuring, self-criticism, blaming others, emotional expression, wishful thinking, and resignation.
Measured: Two weeks
Child and Youth Resilience Measure
The Child \& Youth Resilience Measure (Ungar and Liebenberg, 2011) is a 12 item questionnaire that measures overall resilience, as well as three subcategories that influence resilience processes; individual traits, relationship to caregiver(s), and contextual factors that facilitate a sense of belonging
Measured: Two weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Oct 2023
- Study startOct 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completionApr 2025 (estimated)
- Study completionSep 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Wellness, PsychologicalStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Surrey
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, India Smith, University of Surrey
- Investigators
- India Smith, Principal investigator, Student
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06089447
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FHMS 22-23 237 EGA
- Status last verified
- Oct 2023
- First submitted
- 3 Oct 2023
- Last updated
- 18 Oct 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Anonymised data may be shared outside of the research team for research purposes. Participants will be asked to provide written consent (either electronically or in hard copy) for their anonymous data to be shared in this way. Where an academic journal requires that the original data is made available as per their publication terms, the research team will share only the anonymised data set - this type of data sharing will be covered under the consent form item related to 'data sharing for research purposes'. Data will not be shared with the parent or caregiver. Any requests to access the anonymised trial data should be made to the PI. Data must not be shared outside the research team without the permission of the PI. All members of the research team have been made aware of and have agreed to abide by this data sharing policy. The PI reserves the right to reject any requests to access the anonymised trial data.
Publications
Beets MW, von Klinggraeff L, Weaver RG, Armstrong B, Burkart S. Small studies, big decisions: the role of pilot/feasibility studies in incremental science and premature scale-up of behavioral interventions. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Sep 10;7(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00909-w.
PubMed 34507624Whitehead AL, Julious SA, Cooper CL, Campbell MJ. Estimating the sample size for a pilot randomised trial to minimise the overall trial sample size for the external pilot and main trial for a continuous outcome variable. Stat Methods Med Res. 2016 Jun;25(3):1057-73. doi: 10.1177/0962280215588241. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
PubMed 26092476Information Commissioner's Office. (2018). Guide to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr
Medical Research Council. (2012). Good research practice: Principles and guidelines. In MRC ethics series.
Mind. (2020). Self Harm. Accessible via self-harm-2020.pdf (mind.org.uk)
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Oct 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial of 'The Shadow of Tallystick Valley' for Children and Young People Experiencing Family Substance Use
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06089447
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FHMS 22-23 237 EGA
- Conditions
- Wellness, Psychological
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of SurreyUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Apr 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Sep 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study is investigating the feasibility and acceptability of the story-based intervention, The Shadows of Tallystick Valley, aimed at improving the psychological wellbeing and resilience of children and young people who are affected by familial substance use. A secondary aim of the study is to identify whether there is a 'signal of efficacy'. The early intervention is a story and activity book designed and developed by Book of Beasties, in collaboration with the charity Change Grow Live (CGL), who work directly with children and young people experiencing familial substance use. The intervention is used by s at CGL with children and young people engaged with the service. In the present study, we aim to evaluate the story-based intervention within a pilot randomised controlled trial. Participants will be randomised to either receive the intervention or to join a waitlist for the same intervention. The effects of the story-based intervention will be assessed using pre and post psychological well-being and resilience measures, including KidCOPE, the Stirling Children's Wellbeing Scale and the Child and Youth Resilience Measure. The primary outcome measures are concerned with overall psychological wellbeing.
Detailed description
The aims of this pilot trial are as follows:
To determine whether a full trial is justified; To determine the feasibility and acceptability of the story-based intervention in improving psychological wellbeing and emotional literacy in children and young people experiencing familial substance use; To establish the effect size on the co-primary outcomes for a sample size calculation for a definitive trial.
To establish the feasibility of the intervention, we will collect data on the primary outcome for at least 80% of the recruitment target, and have an attrition rate that does not exceed 40%. A definitive trial will be justified if we are able to successfully recruit and retain participants in the trial, and if both the trial procedures and intervention are deemed to be acceptable to participants. Although the primary aim of pilot RCTs is to answer questions related to feasibility, an important secondary aim is to determine whether there is a signal of efficacy so as to inform the decision to progress to a definitive trial (Beets et al., 2021). The between-group effects will determine whether there is a signal of efficacy in favour of the Shadow of Tallystick Valley intervention and further support the need for a definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT). A signal of efficacy will be considered to be found if the between-group effect size on the co-primary outcomes is in favour of the intervention. Where these conditions are met, this study will therein provide the parameters needed to estimate the sample size for a definitive RCT. We will assess whether the study design is acceptable to participants using recruitment and retention rates (i.e., study and intervention uptake and dropout rates) and qualitative interviews with participants.
The intervention will be offered to children and young people already connected with CGL. Children and young people are referred to the service via a referral from an adult known to them. This can include (but is not limited to) family members, social workers, teachers, school staff, substances, or other youth worker professionals.
Recruitment methods:
Study advert and information pack will be shared by staff across the service with all children and young people who meet the inclusion criteria. If the child or young person wants to proceed, both they and their parent or caregiver must provide either written or verbal consent. Consent will be collected by the assigned support worker at Change Grow Live.
If in the instance a participant withdraws their consent, they will have two weeks after the intervention has been delivered to do so and relevant data will be removed and destroyed. Beyond the two week mark, the data will be written up. If a parent/ caregiver withdraws their consent, CGL would discuss the parents' concerns with them in the hope they can resolve them. If parents/caregiver consent is still withdrawn and the child is under 13, the participant will no longer be involved in the study and relevant data will be destroyed. If in the instance the parent/caregiver withdraws consent for a young person who is over 13 years of age and Gillick Competent, the young person will be able to continue in the study. This is inline with CGL's policy and procedures. If in the instance the parent / caregiver withdraws consent for a child below the age of 13 years, the child or young person will be withdrawn from the study.
The target sample size is based on guidelines by Whitehead et al. (2015) for a pilot trial prior to a main trial with 90% power and two-sided 5% significance expecting a small to medium effect size. We plan to recruit 25 participants per arm (50 in total).
Experimental Design
The present study is a single-blind external pilot randomised controlled trial with two parallel arms including optional qualitative feedback. Support Workers will children and young people (aged between 7 and 18 years). Interested participants will be given a participant information sheet. After reading the PIS, if potential participants are interested in participating in the trial, they will complete an eligibility assessment to determine whether they meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria. If the participant meets the eligibility criteria, they will be invited to complete a consent form. Prospective participants will not be able to progress in the trial without completing the consent statement.
Once participants have provided consent and consent has been given from parent/carer, participants will be allocated a unique ID code and asked to complete the baseline (T0) assessment. A file linking the participants' contact information with the unique IDs will be stored securely in a password-protected file in a OneDrive folder held on the University of Surrey's system. The PI will have the password for this file and give access to this to other members of the research team as needed. The password will not be shared outside of the research team. The T0 assessment can be completed either online or in person. There will be video instructions on how to complete the questionnaires for children and young people to then complete them independently. These videos will be produced after ethical approval so that the information conveyed is in line with the approved protocol and study materials. After the T0 assessment has been completed, participants will be randomly allocated to either receive the immediate intervention arm or a wait-list control group. The outcome of this randomisation will be emailed to the PI and will be logged in the secure, password protected file. The randomisation will be conducted using the simple randomisation function available from Sealed Envelope. Participants will not know which arm they have been allocated to. The support workers will deliver the intervention with the children and young people allocated to the control group of the study. They will have received at least one full day of training designed and delivered by CGL's National Hidden Head Lead. Participants will be contacted 18 weeks post-randomisation to complete the T1 assessment. The T1 assessment can be completed in person or online depending on participants preference. The T1 assessment will replicate the T0 assessment. After completing the T1 assessment, participants will be presented with an end of trial debrief statement.
Data Collection The trial will utilise a mixed methods approach, collecting both quantitative and qualitative data. The quantitative data will be collected at T0 and T1. The qualitative data will be collected from the intervention group in the form of written feedback form or an audio recording after the T1 assessment. Data collection should not involve contact with adults outside of CGL but must have independence to allow for adequate blinding. The data can be collected either online via Qualtrics or in hard copy. There is the potential to have video instructions on how to complete the questionnaires for children and young people to then complete them independently.
The main trial data will be entered into SPSS by the principal investigator. The items will be coded and scored in line with the original questionnaire protocols. A random selection of 20% of the data will be checked against the source (i.e. hard copies of questionnaires) to ensure data quality.
The Principal Investigator will act as the data custodian. The data will be owned by the lead organisation, the University of Surrey.
Data analysis All of the variables will be summarised using descriptive statistics by arm at each time point. We will calculate Cohen's d between-group effect sizes with 95% confidence intervals, comparing the T1 scores of the intervention versus control arms, adjusting effects for the baseline scores using an ANCOVA. The level of missing data for all outcome measures will be reported. As the present study is a pilot trial, we will not be testing any hypotheses and are instead testing evidence for a signal of efficacy in the desired direction.
The research process data will be used to understand the rates of recruitment and retention at all stages of the study. We will report the number of participants who completed and dropped out at each stage of the trial in the form of a CONSORT diagram. The quantitative adherence data will be the number of sessions completed with a child or young person and used to understand the degree of engagement with the intervention amongst participants. We will report the responses using descriptive statistics and describe any patterns that can be observed.
All of the data collected over the course of the study will be collected, stored and maintained in line with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) (Information Commissioner's Office, 2018) . Any hard copies will be scanned so as to become electronic documents. The hard copies will be destroyed. Electronic documents/data will all be stored within a University of Surrey OneDrive folder and protected with a password, accessed only by the research team. The PI will have all of the passwords and share these with members of the research team as needed. No one outside of the research team will have access to the passwords. The PI will assume responsibility for ensuring adherence to the data security protocol.
Data will be retained in accordance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) (Information Commissioner's Office, 2018) and (Medical Research Council, 2012) policies on data storage and archiving. Once the data analysis has been finalised, all anonymised data will be archived at the University of Surrey for up to 10 years. The anonymised data will be retained indefinitely by the PI.
Ethical considerations Consent to take part in this study will be informed. All participants and parents/carers of participants will be given the Participant Information Sheet (PIS) and will not be limited in terms of the amount of time they want to read through it. All participants will be told within the PIS and the consent forms that they can withdraw from the research study at any point. Participants will be asked to sign an item on the consent form that confirms that they are aware of their right to withdraw, and that they are not obligated to provide a reason for leaving the study.
All of the data collected within the research study will be treated as confidential. Identifiable data will not be shared outside of the research team. The study will comply with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and Data Protection Act 2018, which require data to be de-identified as soon as it is practical to do so. Participants will be identified on all documents (both hard copy and electronic) containing research data using a unique participant ID code. All documents will be stored securely and only accessible by the research team. The research team will safeguard the privacy of participants' data.
Participants will be informed within the PIS and consent form that anything they share over the course of the study will be treated as confidential, except for where this information puts themselves or other people at risk. Where confidentiality needs to be broken for safeguarding reasons, the information will only be shared with persons who have a responsibility to monitor and minimise this risk (e.g. s, personal tutors, university counselling team, local safeguarding authorities, mental health services). Participants will be asked to sign an item on the consent form that confirms that they understand our confidentiality policy.
Participants will be reimbursed for their time and effort at a rate of £5 for pre and £5 for post questionnaires completed (£10 in total) in the form of vouchers.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control Group | Experimental | Behavioral: A story based intervention called 'The Shadow of Tallystick Valley'Participants will receive the intervention immediately |
| Waitlist Group | Active comparator | Behavioral: A story based intervention called 'The Shadow of Tallystick Valley'Participants will be allocated to a waitlist group and will receive the intervention aft 6 months. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 7 to 14 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Aged between 7 - 14 years;
- Child: 7 - 10
- YP: 11 - 14
- Able to read age appropriate materials independently;
- Have someone in their family using alcohol and/or substances;
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- They are below age 7 years or above 14 years;
- They are currently engaging in self-harm, including all forms of self harm as set out by Mind (2020), and/or have plans to end their life;all forms of self harm
- Have not given consent to take part in the study;
- Have not received parent or caregiver consent to take part in the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| A story based intervention called 'The Shadow of Tallystick Valley''The Shadows of Tallystick Valley' is a story based intervention for CYP aged 7 - 14 years aimed at supporting the psychological wellbeing and resilience of those affected by familial substance misuse. It has been designed by Book of Beasties, a developer of games and educational content, in collaboration with the charity Change Grow Live, who support those experiencing substance misuse and CYP affected by familial substance misuse in the UK. The wellbeing resource harnesses protective factors, such as respectful and caring conversations with professionals (Wangansteen and Westby, 2019), to facilitate a safe and supportive environment aimed towards understanding the CYPs experience, support their psychological wellbeing and building resilience and coping skills. It uses fictional narratives, including characters that represent particular topics which act as drivers for engagement. | Behavioural | Control Group, Waitlist Group |
Primary outcome
Stirling Children's Wellbeing Scale (SCWBS)
Time frame: Two weeks
The Stirling Children's Wellbeing Scale (SCWBS) (Liddle and Carter, 2015) is a 15-item questionnaire measuring wellbeing.
2 secondary outcomes
KidCOPE
Time frame: Two weeks
Child and Youth Resilience Measure
Time frame: Two weeks
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Oct 2023.
- Background: PubMed 34507624Beets MW, von Klinggraeff L, Weaver RG, Armstrong B, Burkart S. Small studies, big decisions: the role of pilot/feasibility studies in incremental science and premature scale-up of behavioral interventions. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Sep 10;7(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00909-w.
- Background: PubMed 26092476Whitehead AL, Julious SA, Cooper CL, Campbell MJ. Estimating the sample size for a pilot randomised trial to minimise the overall trial sample size for the external pilot and main trial for a continuous outcome variable. Stat Methods Med Res. 2016 Jun;25(3):1057-73. doi: 10.1177/0962280215588241. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
- BackgroundInformation Commissioner's Office. (2018). Guide to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr
- BackgroundMedical Research Council. (2012). Good research practice: Principles and guidelines. In MRC ethics series.
- BackgroundMind. (2020). Self Harm. Accessible via self-harm-2020.pdf (mind.org.uk)
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Anonymised data may be shared outside of the research team for research purposes. Participants will be asked to provide written consent (either electronically or in hard copy) for their anonymous data to be shared in this way. Where an academic journal requires that the original data is made available as per their publication terms, the research team will share only the anonymised data set - this type of data sharing will be covered under the consent form item related to 'data sharing for research purposes'. Data will not be shared with the parent or caregiver. Any requests to access the anonymised trial data should be made to the PI. Data must not be shared outside the research team without the permission of the PI. All members of the research team have been made aware of and have agreed to abide by this data sharing policy. The PI reserves the right to reject any requests to access the anonymised trial data.
Related trials for Wellness, Psychological
Recruiting
Effect of a Brief Daily Digital Meditation on Well-Being in US Young Adults (BEGIN II)
Mental Health and General Well-being
Active, not recruiting
Intervention to Address Disparate Mental Health Consequences of COVID-19 Pandemic on Latinx and African Newcomers
Mental Health Issue, Mental Health Disorder
Not yet recruiting
REM Enhancement Sleep Technology for Well-being, Emotion, and Life Lift
Healthy Adult Participants
Recruiting
Effects of Red Panax Ginseng Supplementation on Cognitive Performance and Emotional Well-Being in Young Healthy Adults
Mental Acuity
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
India Smith principal investigator
Student
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing A story based intervention called 'The Shadow of Tallystick Valley' in people with Wellness, Psychological, run by University of Surrey at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Oct 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact India Smith (07442256086, i.smith@surrey.ac.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Stirling Children's Wellbeing Scale (SCWBS) (time frame: Two weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06089447, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Oct 2023.