Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2NCT06091501
LIVING - Physical Activity in a Self-management Program Among Persons With Type 2 Diabetes
A study testing Lev Livet in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 and Randomized Controlled Trial, run by University of Aarhus at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
The goal of this pragmatic clinical trial is to evaluate two municipality-based interventions, Lev Livet (one without physical activity and one with) against no intervention in people with type 2 diabetes. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Randomized Controlled Trial
- What is being tested?
- Lev Livet
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 288 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- Oct 2023to Jul 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosed with T2D
- Age >=18 years
- able to speak and understand Danish
- individuals assessed fit by a health care professional to attend a diabetes self-management program
Who cannot join
- Contraindication to increasing level of physical activity assessed by the participant' general practitioner (e.g. unstable angina, uncontrolled arrhythmias or severe aortic stenosis)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Denmark1 site
Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus
Aarhus N, 8200
Anette Andersen, +4520603399, anette.andersen@rm.dk
Jonas Munk Jensen
About this study
The goal of this pragmatic clinical trial is to evaluate two municipality-based interventions, Lev Livet (one without physical activity and one with) against no intervention in people with type 2 diabetes. The main questions it aims to answer are: • What is the additive effect of HiiT on accelerometer-measured physical activity? • Which factors that facilitate or limit the implementation of Lev Livet? • What are the health-economic implications of the intervention? Participants will participate in a disease management program with and without physical activity added. Researchers will compare with no intervention to see if Lev Livet improves diabetes self-management.
Read the detailed description
Trial design The LIVING project is designed as a parallel-group, 2-arm pragmatic RCT. The trial sites are to deliver either sub study 1: Lev Livet versus a five month waiting list or sub study 2: Lev Livet + HIIT versus a five month waiting list. At the clarifying interview with a health professional in the municipality, the participants will be randomly allocated to either Lev Livet (+HIIT) or a waiting list (control group). Within each sub study, the participants will be randomly allocated (2:1) to intervention or a control group.
Participants All people living with T2D being referred from their general practitioner or a hospital to the municipality can be included in the project.
Intervention Lev Livet is a group-based program where the aim for the participant is to acquire skills to master their daily life with T2D. The program consists of 9 sessions with a duration of two and a half to three hours for each session. In the first four sessions coping skills are taught across different chronic diseases. In this part of the program citizens suffering from different chronic diseases can participate. Participants living with T2D then move on to four diabetes-specific sessions, followed by a ninth follow up session. The eight first sessions are held consecutively over eight weeks. The ninth session is held three weeks after the eighth session.
During the 8 weeks, a supervised HIIT-protocol comprising blocks of 5 x 1 min high-intensity intervals interrupted by 1 min active recovery will be added. Between each blocks, a 4 min brake will be planned where the participant can shift from an upper body exercise to a lower body exercise or vice versa. The HIIT intervention will progress continuously, from two weekly exercise sessions with two exercise blocks (22 minutes of exercise) in the first two weeks, to two weekly exercise sessions with four exercise blocks in the last four weeks of the intervention. The exercise intensity will be monitored using the Borg 15 scale. The intensity of exercise will be set to Borg 14-16 corresponding to 77-93% of maximal heart rate. In addition to the two exercise therapy sessions, the participants will be instructed to independently complete an exercise session equivalent to the exercise therapy session for that week.
Statistical analyses The primary analyses of both the primary and secondary outcomes will be based on the mean difference between individual changes from baseline to 3 months when comparing the Lev Livet intervention and control group.
Analysis will be done according to the intention-to-treat principle, meaning that all participants allocated to an active treatment group will be analysed as a member of that group regardless of their compliance with the intervention. Missing data will be imputed in the primary analysis using a multiple imputation procedure29.
The analysis will be performed using a mixed model with repeated measures. Specifically, time as a categorical covariate, randomisation status, and their interaction will be included. This will allow assessment of difference at each time point of follow-up between groups, as well as of the overall difference. Dependence of repeated observations for participants will be handled with a random effect for participant. In addition, random effects for group and municipality will be included, assuming independence between random effects at different levels (participant, group, municipality). To explore the effect of adding HIIT to the intervention, the investigators will use a mixed model as described above, but with an added interaction term between sub study 2, sub study 1 and follow-up status. Further, the effect of adding HIIT to the intervention will be explored on other outcomes conducting analysis of mediation.
Analyses of baseline equivalence between groups of intervention and control group will be performed. In order to increase precision of the outcome estimate, covariates can be included in the analyses if relevant.
Power calculation and sample size In a realistic real-world set-up, each municipality will be able to run two rounds of intervention, e.g. randomize participants into two intervention groups and two control groups. The intervention to control group ratio is estimated to be 2:1. Number of participants in each intervention group is expected to be 12 and 6 in each control group, meaning that each municipality has to randomise 36 participants. A simulation procedure was applied to estimate the power assuming a difference in change between groups of 5 and that individual changes had an SD (standard deviation) of 4. Including four municipalities in each sub study, 8 in total (288 participants in total) would yield a power of 80%.
Qualitative study on the health care professionals' perspective To gain knowledge on the implementation process of the intervention Lev Livet, and Lev Livet + HIIT, the perspectives of the providing health care professionals will be investigated13.
During the delivery of the intervention, the experiences of twenty to thirty healthcare professionals from various sites will be examined. Data collection will include participant observations30 and focus group interviews31. The following research questions will guide data collection:
- What is at stake in clinical practice when delivering the intervention?
- How do healthcare professionals perceive their relation to the patients during the intervention?
- What characterizes the health care support given to patients during the intervention? Thematic analysis32 will lead to new insight into the healthcare professional perspective during the intervention, relevant for further refinements and implementation.
Qualitative approach to explore participants' experiences Inspired by realistic evaluation33, the aim is to explore what parts of the disease management program work for whom and why. This includes an exploration of the barriers of implementing new knowledge and habits from Lev Livet into the participants' daily lives as well as the elements they have successfully implemented.
After completing Lev Livet, participants from sub study 2 in two different municipalities (n=24), will be invited for an interview. Using a semi-structured, open-ended interview methodology34, the interviews will touch upon topics such as; their daily life with diabetes, expectations before participating in Lev Livet, their experienced outcomes, motivation to participate and carry on with new habits, and being part of a group with a disease in common.
Participants in the first round of interviews will be invited for follow-up interviews four to six months later. These will focus on how the participants have managed their diabetes since Lev Livet, which habits they have or have not implemented into their daily lives and which factors play into what works in their daily setting.
Health economic evaluation As there are expectedly multiple effects of varying character, a cost consequence analysis will be performed to analyse the health economic consequences of the intervention. The costs of the Lev Livet intervention as well as the HIIT component is estimated and these costs are related to the primary and secondary outcomes collectively. When estimating the costs, a rigorous approach will be applied. This includes identifying all relevant cost components in collaboration with project participants, measuring the resources consumed using the most appropriate method for each cost component, and finally calculating the monetary value by using individual unit prices35.
- Being tested
- Lev Livet
- Keywords
- Diabetes self-management program, High intensity interval training
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Lev LivetBehavioural
The program consists of a total of 9 sessions with a duration of two and a half to three hours for each session. In the first four sessions coping skills are taught across different chronic diseases. In this part of the program citizens suffering from different chronic diseases can participate. Citizens living with T2D then move on to four diabetes-specific sessions, followed by a ninth follow up session. The sessions are held consecutively over eight weeks. The ninth session is held three weeks after the eighth session.
The 8 weeks supervised HIIT-protocol will be comprised of blocks of 5 x 1 min high-intensity intervals interrupted by 1 min active recovery. The HIIT intervention will progress continuously, from two weekly training sessions with two training blocks (22 minutes of training) in the first two weeks, to two weekly training sessions with four training blocks in the last four weeks of the intervention.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Lev Livet | Experimental | The participants will receive the 9 weeks of Lev Livet intervention Receives: Behavioral: Lev Livet |
| Lev Livet control | No intervention | The participants will attend 5 months of waiting list |
| Lev Livet + HiiT | Experimental | The participants will receive the 9 weeks of Lev Livet intervention AND 9 weeks of HiiT training Receives: Behavioral: Lev Livet |
| Lev Livet + HiiT control | No intervention | The participants will attend 5 months of waiting list |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The between group differences for change in Perceived competence in Diabetes (PCS-5)
PCS-5 is a five 5-item scale with seven response categories from not at all true to very, true, assessing the degree to which the individual feel they can manage their diabetes. Range 7-35 with higher scores indicating higher competences in managing own diabetes.
Measured: From baseline to endpoint (month 3) and follow-up (month 5, 8 and 12)
Secondary outcomes (1)
The between group differences for change in physical activity
The accelerometer-measured outcome is defined as purposeful moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in people living with T2D
Measured: From baseline to endpoint (month 3) and follow-up month 5
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Oct 2023
- Study startOct 2023 (estimated)
- Primary completionJul 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionJul 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of AarhusThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The study is designed as a parallel-group, 2-arm pragmatic RCT. The primary outcome is diabetes competences measured by The Perceived Competence in Diabetes scale (PCD) before and after 8 weeks of interventions. The trial sites are to deliver either (1) Lev Livet or (2) Lev Livet + HiiT. Within each trial site the participants will be randomly allocated (2:1) to intervention or a control group.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 288 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Aarhus
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Aarhus University Hospital, Odense University Hospital, Region Zealand
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Anette Andersen, Principal investigator, Aarhus University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06091501
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- LIVING
- Status last verified
- Oct 2023
- First submitted
- 13 Oct 2023
- Last updated
- 25 Oct 2023
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Jensen JM, Sorensen KV, Stovring H, Andersen A. LIVING - protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of three different levels of diabetes self-management programs. Contemp Clin Trials. 2025 Jun;153:107891. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2025.107891. Epub 2025 Mar 29.
PubMed 40164303
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Oct 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- LIVING - Physical Activity in a Self-management Program Among Persons With Type 2 Diabetes
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06091501
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LIVING
- Keywords
- Diabetes self-management program, High intensity interval training
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 288 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of AarhusUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Aarhus University Hospital, Odense University Hospital, Region Zealand
- Study start
- Oct 2023 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jul 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 19 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this pragmatic clinical trial is to evaluate two municipality-based interventions, Lev Livet (one without physical activity and one with) against no intervention in people with type 2 diabetes. The main questions it aims to answer are: • What is the additive effect of HiiT on accelerometer-measured physical activity? • Which factors that facilitate or limit the implementation of Lev Livet? • What are the health-economic implications of the intervention? Participants will participate in a disease management program with and without physical activity added. Researchers will compare with no intervention to see if Lev Livet improves diabetes self-management.
Detailed description
Trial design The LIVING project is designed as a parallel-group, 2-arm pragmatic RCT. The trial sites are to deliver either sub study 1: Lev Livet versus a five month waiting list or sub study 2: Lev Livet + HIIT versus a five month waiting list. At the clarifying interview with a health professional in the municipality, the participants will be randomly allocated to either Lev Livet (+HIIT) or a waiting list (control group). Within each sub study, the participants will be randomly allocated (2:1) to intervention or a control group.
Participants All people living with T2D being referred from their general practitioner or a hospital to the municipality can be included in the project.
Intervention Lev Livet is a group-based program where the aim for the participant is to acquire skills to master their daily life with T2D. The program consists of 9 sessions with a duration of two and a half to three hours for each session. In the first four sessions coping skills are taught across different chronic diseases. In this part of the program citizens suffering from different chronic diseases can participate. Participants living with T2D then move on to four diabetes-specific sessions, followed by a ninth follow up session. The eight first sessions are held consecutively over eight weeks. The ninth session is held three weeks after the eighth session.
During the 8 weeks, a supervised HIIT-protocol comprising blocks of 5 x 1 min high-intensity intervals interrupted by 1 min active recovery will be added. Between each blocks, a 4 min brake will be planned where the participant can shift from an upper body exercise to a lower body exercise or vice versa. The HIIT intervention will progress continuously, from two weekly exercise sessions with two exercise blocks (22 minutes of exercise) in the first two weeks, to two weekly exercise sessions with four exercise blocks in the last four weeks of the intervention. The exercise intensity will be monitored using the Borg 15 scale. The intensity of exercise will be set to Borg 14-16 corresponding to 77-93% of maximal heart rate. In addition to the two exercise therapy sessions, the participants will be instructed to independently complete an exercise session equivalent to the exercise therapy session for that week.
Statistical analyses The primary analyses of both the primary and secondary outcomes will be based on the mean difference between individual changes from baseline to 3 months when comparing the Lev Livet intervention and control group.
Analysis will be done according to the intention-to-treat principle, meaning that all participants allocated to an active treatment group will be analysed as a member of that group regardless of their compliance with the intervention. Missing data will be imputed in the primary analysis using a multiple imputation procedure29.
The analysis will be performed using a mixed model with repeated measures. Specifically, time as a categorical covariate, randomisation status, and their interaction will be included. This will allow assessment of difference at each time point of follow-up between groups, as well as of the overall difference. Dependence of repeated observations for participants will be handled with a random effect for participant. In addition, random effects for group and municipality will be included, assuming independence between random effects at different levels (participant, group, municipality). To explore the effect of adding HIIT to the intervention, the investigators will use a mixed model as described above, but with an added interaction term between sub study 2, sub study 1 and follow-up status. Further, the effect of adding HIIT to the intervention will be explored on other outcomes conducting analysis of mediation.
Analyses of baseline equivalence between groups of intervention and control group will be performed. In order to increase precision of the outcome estimate, covariates can be included in the analyses if relevant.
Power calculation and sample size In a realistic real-world set-up, each municipality will be able to run two rounds of intervention, e.g. randomize participants into two intervention groups and two control groups. The intervention to control group ratio is estimated to be 2:1. Number of participants in each intervention group is expected to be 12 and 6 in each control group, meaning that each municipality has to randomise 36 participants. A simulation procedure was applied to estimate the power assuming a difference in change between groups of 5 and that individual changes had an SD (standard deviation) of 4. Including four municipalities in each sub study, 8 in total (288 participants in total) would yield a power of 80%.
Qualitative study on the health care professionals' perspective To gain knowledge on the implementation process of the intervention Lev Livet, and Lev Livet + HIIT, the perspectives of the providing health care professionals will be investigated13.
During the delivery of the intervention, the experiences of twenty to thirty healthcare professionals from various sites will be examined. Data collection will include participant observations30 and focus group interviews31. The following research questions will guide data collection:
- What is at stake in clinical practice when delivering the intervention?
- How do healthcare professionals perceive their relation to the patients during the intervention?
- What characterizes the health care support given to patients during the intervention? Thematic analysis32 will lead to new insight into the healthcare professional perspective during the intervention, relevant for further refinements and implementation.
Qualitative approach to explore participants' experiences Inspired by realistic evaluation33, the aim is to explore what parts of the disease management program work for whom and why. This includes an exploration of the barriers of implementing new knowledge and habits from Lev Livet into the participants' daily lives as well as the elements they have successfully implemented.
After completing Lev Livet, participants from sub study 2 in two different municipalities (n=24), will be invited for an interview. Using a semi-structured, open-ended interview methodology34, the interviews will touch upon topics such as; their daily life with diabetes, expectations before participating in Lev Livet, their experienced outcomes, motivation to participate and carry on with new habits, and being part of a group with a disease in common.
Participants in the first round of interviews will be invited for follow-up interviews four to six months later. These will focus on how the participants have managed their diabetes since Lev Livet, which habits they have or have not implemented into their daily lives and which factors play into what works in their daily setting.
Health economic evaluation As there are expectedly multiple effects of varying character, a cost consequence analysis will be performed to analyse the health economic consequences of the intervention. The costs of the Lev Livet intervention as well as the HIIT component is estimated and these costs are related to the primary and secondary outcomes collectively. When estimating the costs, a rigorous approach will be applied. This includes identifying all relevant cost components in collaboration with project participants, measuring the resources consumed using the most appropriate method for each cost component, and finally calculating the monetary value by using individual unit prices35.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
- Model description
- The study is designed as a parallel-group, 2-arm pragmatic RCT. The primary outcome is diabetes competences measured by The Perceived Competence in Diabetes scale (PCD) before and after 8 weeks of interventions. The trial sites are to deliver either (1) Lev Livet or (2) Lev Livet + HiiT. Within each trial site the participants will be randomly allocated (2:1) to intervention or a control group.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Lev Livet | Experimental | Behavioral: Lev LivetThe participants will receive the 9 weeks of Lev Livet intervention |
| Lev Livet control | No intervention | –The participants will attend 5 months of waiting list |
| Lev Livet + HiiT | Experimental | Behavioral: Lev LivetThe participants will receive the 9 weeks of Lev Livet intervention AND 9 weeks of HiiT training |
| Lev Livet + HiiT control | No intervention | –The participants will attend 5 months of waiting list |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Diagnosed with T2D
- Age >=18 years
- able to speak and understand Danish
- individuals assessed fit by a health care professional to attend a diabetes self-management program
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Contraindication to increasing level of physical activity assessed by the participant' general practitioner (e.g. unstable angina, uncontrolled arrhythmias or severe aortic stenosis)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Lev LivetThe program consists of a total of 9 sessions with a duration of two and a half to three hours for each session. In the first four sessions coping skills are taught across different chronic diseases. In this part of the program citizens suffering from different chronic diseases can participate. Citizens living with T2D then move on to four diabetes-specific sessions, followed by a ninth follow up session. The sessions are held consecutively over eight weeks. The ninth session is held three weeks after the eighth session. The 8 weeks supervised HIIT-protocol will be comprised of blocks of 5 x 1 min high-intensity intervals interrupted by 1 min active recovery. The HIIT intervention will progress continuously, from two weekly training sessions with two training blocks (22 minutes of training) in the first two weeks, to two weekly training sessions with four training blocks in the last four weeks of the intervention. | Behavioural | Lev Livet, Lev Livet + HiiT |
Primary outcome
The between group differences for change in Perceived competence in Diabetes (PCS-5)
Time frame: From baseline to endpoint (month 3) and follow-up (month 5, 8 and 12)
PCS-5 is a five 5-item scale with seven response categories from not at all true to very, true, assessing the degree to which the individual feel they can manage their diabetes. Range 7-35 with higher scores indicating higher competences in managing own diabetes.
1 secondary outcome
The between group differences for change in physical activity
Time frame: From baseline to endpoint (month 3) and follow-up month 5
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Oct 2023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40164303Jensen JM, Sorensen KV, Stovring H, Andersen A. LIVING - protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of three different levels of diabetes self-management programs. Contemp Clin Trials. 2025 Jun;153:107891. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2025.107891. Epub 2025 Mar 29.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
RecruitingObservational study
Genetics of Type 2 Diabetes in West Africans
Hypertension, Diabetes
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study Comparing SHR-3167 With Insulin Degludec in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Currently Treated With Basal Insulin
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Active, not recruiting
Chrono Nutrition and Insulin Resistance in Diabetes
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Clinical Research Trial to Study Insulin Sensitivity Using Automated Glucose Clamp Technology
Obesity Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Obese Adults
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Eloralintide (LY3841136) in Participants With Obesity or Overweight, Type 2 Diabetes, and Increased Cardiovascular Risk
Obesity, Overweight
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Anette Andersen principal investigator
Aarhus University Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Lev Livet in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 and Randomized Controlled Trial, run by University of Aarhus at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Oct 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Anette Andersen, MD, PhD (+4522135605, anette.andersen@rm.dk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The between group differences for change in Perceived competence in Diabetes (PCS-5) (time frame: From baseline to endpoint (month 3) and follow-up (month 5, 8 and 12)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06091501, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Oct 2023.