Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2REMINDNCT06092476
Trial to Evaluate Efficacy+Safety of Revita DMR Treatment Paradigm 1 and Retreatment in Type 2 Diabetes Patients
A study testing Revita® DMR Treatment in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) at 1 site in Netherlands.
Trial summary
The objective of this study is to evaluate feasibility, safety, and efficacy of endoscopic DMR Treatment Paradigm 1 (compared to sham) and to evaluate feasibility, safety, and efficacy of re-treatment with DMR at 24 weeks (compared to baseline and a single DMR procedure) in patients with type 2 diabetes with… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- What is being tested?
- Revita® DMR Treatment
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 18 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNetherlands
- Study dates
- 9 Aug 2024to 1 Jan 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes.
- Age ≥ 18 to ≤ 75 years.
- Insulin naïve patients who are on stable dose (maximally approved or tolerated dose) of 2 or more glucose lowering drugs, including metformin, sulphonylurea (SU), (sodium-glucose cotransporter-2) inhibitors (SGLT-2i), Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) or dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) and/or, thiazolidinedionderivaten (TZD) for at least 12 weeks.
- BMI ≥ 24 and ≤ 40 kg/m2
- HbA1c of ≥ 54 mmol/mol (7.5%) and ≤ 86 mmol/mol (10.0%).
- Signed and dated written informed consent in accordance with Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and local legislation.
Who cannot join
- Uncontrolled hyperglycemia with a glucose level >270 mg/dl (>15.0 mmol/L) after an overnight 8-hour fasting at the end of run-in and confirmed by a second measurement on the consecutive day.
- Subjects who are using insuline.
- Known case of absolute insulin deficiency as indicated by a fasting plasma C-peptide value of <0.6 ng/ml (<0,2 nmol/L).
- Diagnosis of autoimmune diabetes/Type 1 diabetes mellitus, monogenic (neonatal or maturity onset diabetes of the young (MODY)) diabetes or Type 1 diabetes in adults/latent autoimmune diabetes of adults (LADA).
- History of more than 1 severe hypoglycemia episode or unawareness within past 6 months in which third party assistance was needed.
- Clinically significant valvular heart disease or severe aortic stenosis.
Show all 28Show fewer
- Acute coronary syndrome (non-ST wave elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI), STEMI and unstable angina pectoris), stroke or transient ischemic attack within the past 3 months.
- Indication of acute liver disease, defined by serum levels of either ALT (SGPT), AST (SGOT), or alkaline phosphatase above 3 x upper limit of normal (ULN).
- Presence of acute or chronic active hepatitis B or C (except if hepatitis C is cured) or cirrhosis; or hepatic decompensation during the last 6 months; or alcoholic or autoimmune chronic hepatitis.
- Impaired renal function, defined as estimated Glomerular Filtration rate (eGFR) < 45 ml/min/1.73m2 or end stage renal failure or on dialysis.
- Diagnosed with esophageal motility disorder or Glomerular Filtration rate (GERD) gr 3 or diagnosed during screening endoscopy.
- Known history of a structural or functional disorder of the stomach, e.g. active gastric ulcer, chronic gastritis, gastric varices, hiatal hernia, stomach cancer or any other disorder of the stomach.
- Previous GI surgery that could affect the ability to treat the duodenum such as patients who have had a Billroth 2, Roux-and-Y gastric bypass, gastric sleeve or other similar procedures.
- Known intestinal autoimmune disease, including Celiac disease, or pre-existing symptoms of lupus erythematosus, scleroderma, or other autoimmune connective tissue disorder, which affects the small intestine.
- Patients with active helicobacter pylori infection. Patients may be enrolled if they had history of h-pylori infection and were successfully treated.
- History of active malignancy or partial remission from clinically significant malignancy within the past 5 years. With the exception of basal or squamous cell skin cancer or carcinoma in situ or those received curative treatment and in complete remission for 5 years or if subject confirmed as cancer free.
- Blood dyscrasias or any disorders causing hemolysis or unstable Red Blood Cells (sickle cell trait is allowed).
- Known case of severe peripheral vascular disease.
- Clinically active systemic infection.
- Known immunocompromised status, including individuals who have undergone organ transplantation, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy within the past 12 months, clinically significant leukopenia or positive for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), on potential immunosuppressants.
- Current treatment with systemic steroids or change in dosage of thyroid hormones within 6 weeks prior to consent or any other uncontrolled endocrine disorder.
- Use of anticoagulation therapy (such as warfarin, coumadin, Novel Oral AntiCoagulants (NOAC) or anti-platelet agents (such as thienopyridine) which cannot be discontinued for 5-7 days or 2 drug half-lives before the procedure; Acetylsalicylic acid does not need to be discontinued.
- Actively participating in weight loss program or using medications for weight loss 3 months prior to randomization.
- General contraindications to deep or conscious sedation or general anesthesia or high risk (e.g., American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification (ASA) 4 or higher) or contraindications to upper GI Endoscopy.
- Nursing or Pregnant women or women of child bearing potential who are unwilling to practice acceptable method of birth control.
- History of alcohol, legal or illegal drug and substance abuse.
- Intake of an investigational drug in another trial within 30 days prior to consent or active participation in another clinical trial of an investigational drug or device.
- Any other clinical or mental condition which would jeopardize subject's safety or makes subject a poor candidate for clinical trial participation.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Double-blind Sham-controlled Trial to Evaluate Efficacy+Safety of Revita Duodenal Mucosal Resurfacing (DMR) Treatment Paradigm+Retreatment in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Using Non-insulin Glucose Lowering Medications (REMIND)
The objective of this study is to evaluate feasibility, safety, and efficacy of endoscopic DMR Treatment Paradigm 1 (compared to sham) and to evaluate feasibility, safety, and efficacy of re-treatment with DMR at 24 weeks (compared to baseline and a single DMR procedure) in patients with type 2 diabetes with non-insulin glucose lowering medications.
Read the detailed description
The objective of this study is to evaluate feasibility, safety, and efficacy of endoscopic DMR Treatment Paradigm 1 (compared to sham) and to evaluate feasibility, safety, and efficacy of re-treatment with DMR at 24 weeks (compared to baseline and a single DMR procedure) in patients with type 2 diabetes with non-insulin glucose lowering medications.
The aimed effect is an adequate or improved glucose regulation and a decrease of HbA1c. Secondary effects include improved cardiovascular, hepatic, and metabolic parameters.
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Being tested
- Revita® DMR Treatment, Sham procedure
- Keywords
- Type 2 Diabetes, Duodenal ablation, Endoscopy, Duodenal Mucosal Resurfacing
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Revita® DMR TreatmentDevice
Also called Revita® DMR Treatment Paradigm 1, Revita Duodenal Mucosal Resurfacing
The Revita® System is an endoscopic treatment consisting of a single catheter and console designed to lift the duodenal mucosa with saline followed by controlled circumferential hydrothermal ablation of the mucosa. For this study Revita® DMR procedure will be conducted as follows:
DMR Treatment Paradigm 1- After initial 2 Lift and Ablate step, remaining Lift: Ablate steps will be conducted in 1:1 manner.
Sham procedureOther
The sham control for the Revita DMR procedure.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| DMR procedure | Active comparator | Patients receive Revita® DMR Treatment Paradigm 1. After unblinding at 24 weeks, they receive retreatment. Receives: Device: Revita® DMR Treatment |
| Sham procedure | Sham comparator | Patients receive a sham procedure. After unblinding takes place at 24 weeks, patients receive a Revita® DMR Treatment Paradigm 1. 48 weeks after initial sham (= 24 weeks after first DMR) patients may receive retreatment, if they want to. Receives: Other: Sham procedure |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Safety endpoint
Safety endpoint is evaluated 12 weeks post DMR and 12 weeks post retreatment with DMR
- Number (percentage) of patients experienced device and procedure-related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Unanticipated Device Effects (UADEs), Serious Adverse Device Effects (SADEs), Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction (SUSARs)
Measured: 12 weeks post DMR and 12 weeks post retreatment with DMR
Feasibility endpoint 1
Feasibility endpoint is evaluated during and after the procedure:
- Number of ablations, whether a DMR was successful (>3 ablations)
Measured: During procedure
Feasibility endpoint 2
Feasibility endpoint is evaluated during and after the procedure:
- Procedure time, defined as time between catheter in and catheter out.
Measured: During procedure
Efficacy endpoint 1
Efficacy is evaluated at 24 weeks compared to baseline and sham:
- Mean change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)/Flash Glucose Monitoring (FGM)
Measured: 24 weeks post DMR/sham
Efficacy endpoint 2
Efficacy is evaluated at 24 weeks compared to baseline and sham:
- Change in HbA1c
Measured: 24 weeks post DMR/sham
Secondary outcomes (20)
Secondary safety endpoint
Secondary safety endpoint is evaluated during follow-up and compared to baseline and sham at week 24 and compared to baseline and 12 weeks after (re)-DMR for all patients: incidences and event rates of hypoglycemic events during complete study period
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 1: mean change in HbA1c
Efficacy endpoint 1: mean change in HbA1c
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 2: mean Change in Fasting Glucose
Efficacy endpoint 2: mean Change in Fasting Glucose
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 2: mean Change in Time in Range (TIR)
Efficacy endpoint 2: mean Change in Time in Range
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 3: In patients with baseline abnormal Alanine Transaminase (ALT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), and Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT) values, change in ALT, AST, GGT
Efficacy endpoint 3: In patients with baseline abnormal ALT, AST and GGT values, change in ALT, AST, GGT
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 4: Change in body weight
Efficacy endpoint 4: Change in body weight
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 5: Change in Fasting C-peptide
Efficacy endpoint 5: Change in Fasting C-peptide
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 6: Change in FPG
Efficacy endpoint 6: Change in FPG
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 7: Change in homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR)
Efficacy endpoint 7: Change in HOMA-IR
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 8: Change in Framingham Risk Score-Cardiovascular risk score (FRS-CVD)
Efficacy endpoint 8: Change in Framingham Risk Score-Cardiovascular risk score (FRS-CVD)
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 9: Change in MRI-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF)
Efficacy endpoint 9: Change in MRI-PDFF
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 10: Achievement of HbA1c ≤ 53 mmol/mol (7.0%)
Efficacy endpoint 10: Achievement of HbA1c ≤ 53 mmol/mol (7.0%)
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 11: Change in food intake (amount of calories, fat, carbohydrates, proteins etc.) based on intake registration data
Efficacy endpoint 11: Change in food intake (amount of calories, fat, carbohydrates, proteins etc.) based on intake registration data
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Mechanistic: Change in resection tissue findings in morphological features
Mechanistic: Change in morphological features
Measured: Week 12 after (re)DMR
Mechanistic: Change in resection tissue findings in functional level changes
Mechanistic: Change in functional level changes
Measured: Week 12 after (re)DMR
Mechanistic: Change in resection tissue findings in cellular level changes
Mechanistic: Change in cellular level changes
Measured: Week 12 after (re)DMR
Mechanistic: Mean Changes in small intestinal biopsy gene expression
Mechanistic: Mean Changes in small intestinal biopsy gene expression
Measured: Week 12 after (re)DMR
Mechanistic: Mean Changes in small intestinal biopsy metabolomics/proteomics
Mechanistic: Mean Changes in small intestinal biopsy metabolomics /proteomics
Measured: Week 12 after (re)DMR
Mechanistic: Change in Plasma Citrulline
Mechanistic: Change in Plasma Citrulline
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Mechanistic: Change in Cystatin Value
Mechanistic: Change in Cystatin Value
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Oct 2023
- Study start9 Aug 2024
- Primary completion1 Mar 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jan 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- The study is a single-center, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Fractyl Health Inc.
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jacques J.G.H.M. Bergman, Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
- Investigators
- Jacques JG Bergman, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Amsterdam UMC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06092476
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NL82963.018.23
- Acronym
- REMIND
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 22 Sep 2023
- Last updated
- 6 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Double-blind Sham-controlled Trial to Evaluate Efficacy+Safety of Revita Duodenal Mucosal Resurfacing (DMR) Treatment Paradigm+Retreatment in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Using Non-insulin Glucose Lowering Medications (REMIND)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06092476
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REMIND / NL82963.018.23
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Keywords
- Type 2 Diabetes, Duodenal ablation, Endoscopy, Duodenal Mucosal Resurfacing
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Fractyl Health Inc.
- Study start
- 9 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Mar 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jan 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 23 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this study is to evaluate feasibility, safety, and efficacy of endoscopic DMR Treatment Paradigm 1 (compared to sham) and to evaluate feasibility, safety, and efficacy of re-treatment with DMR at 24 weeks (compared to baseline and a single DMR procedure) in patients with type 2 diabetes with non-insulin glucose lowering medications.
Detailed description
The objective of this study is to evaluate feasibility, safety, and efficacy of endoscopic DMR Treatment Paradigm 1 (compared to sham) and to evaluate feasibility, safety, and efficacy of re-treatment with DMR at 24 weeks (compared to baseline and a single DMR procedure) in patients with type 2 diabetes with non-insulin glucose lowering medications.
The aimed effect is an adequate or improved glucose regulation and a decrease of HbA1c. Secondary effects include improved cardiovascular, hepatic, and metabolic parameters.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The study is a single-center, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| DMR procedure | Active comparator | Device: Revita® DMR TreatmentPatients receive Revita® DMR Treatment Paradigm 1. After unblinding at 24 weeks, they receive retreatment. |
| Sham procedure | Sham comparator | Other: Sham procedurePatients receive a sham procedure. After unblinding takes place at 24 weeks, patients receive a Revita® DMR Treatment Paradigm 1. 48 weeks after initial sham (= 24 weeks after first DMR) patients may receive retreatment, if they want to. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes.
- Age ≥ 18 to ≤ 75 years.
- Insulin naïve patients who are on stable dose (maximally approved or tolerated dose) of 2 or more glucose lowering drugs, including metformin, sulphonylurea (SU), (sodium-glucose cotransporter-2) inhibitors (SGLT-2i), Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) or dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) and/or, thiazolidinedionderivaten (TZD) for at least 12 weeks.
- BMI ≥ 24 and ≤ 40 kg/m2
- HbA1c of ≥ 54 mmol/mol (7.5%) and ≤ 86 mmol/mol (10.0%).
Key exclusion criteria (28 listed)
- Uncontrolled hyperglycemia with a glucose level >270 mg/dl (>15.0 mmol/L) after an overnight 8-hour fasting at the end of run-in and confirmed by a second measurement on the consecutive day.
- Subjects who are using insuline.
- Known case of absolute insulin deficiency as indicated by a fasting plasma C-peptide value of <0.6 ng/ml (<0,2 nmol/L).
- Diagnosis of autoimmune diabetes/Type 1 diabetes mellitus, monogenic (neonatal or maturity onset diabetes of the young (MODY)) diabetes or Type 1 diabetes in adults/latent autoimmune diabetes of adults (LADA).
- History of more than 1 severe hypoglycemia episode or unawareness within past 6 months in which third party assistance was needed.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Revita® DMR TreatmentAlso: Revita® DMR Treatment Paradigm 1, Revita Duodenal Mucosal ResurfacingThe Revita® System is an endoscopic treatment consisting of a single catheter and console designed to lift the duodenal mucosa with saline followed by controlled circumferential hydrothermal ablation of the mucosa. For this study Revita® DMR procedure will be conducted as follows: DMR Treatment Paradigm 1- After initial 2 Lift and Ablate step, remaining Lift: Ablate steps will be conducted in 1:1 manner. | Device | DMR procedure |
| Sham procedureThe sham control for the Revita DMR procedure. | Other | Sham procedure |
Primary outcome
Safety endpoint
Time frame: 12 weeks post DMR and 12 weeks post retreatment with DMR
Safety endpoint is evaluated 12 weeks post DMR and 12 weeks post retreatment with DMR - Number (percentage) of patients experienced device and procedure-related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Unanticipated Device Effects (UADEs), Serious Adverse Device Effects (SADEs), Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction (SUSARs)
Feasibility endpoint 1
Time frame: During procedure
Feasibility endpoint is evaluated during and after the procedure: - Number of ablations, whether a DMR was successful (>3 ablations)
Feasibility endpoint 2
Time frame: During procedure
Feasibility endpoint is evaluated during and after the procedure: - Procedure time, defined as time between catheter in and catheter out.
Efficacy endpoint 1
Time frame: 24 weeks post DMR/sham
Efficacy is evaluated at 24 weeks compared to baseline and sham: - Mean change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)/Flash Glucose Monitoring (FGM)
Efficacy endpoint 2
Time frame: 24 weeks post DMR/sham
Efficacy is evaluated at 24 weeks compared to baseline and sham: - Change in HbA1c
20 secondary outcomes
Secondary safety endpoint
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 1: mean change in HbA1c
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 2: mean Change in Fasting Glucose
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 2: mean Change in Time in Range (TIR)
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 3: In patients with baseline abnormal Alanine Transaminase (ALT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), and Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT) values, change in ALT, AST, GGT
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 4: Change in body weight
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 5: Change in Fasting C-peptide
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 6: Change in FPG
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 7: Change in homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR)
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 8: Change in Framingham Risk Score-Cardiovascular risk score (FRS-CVD)
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 9: Change in MRI-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF)
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 10: Achievement of HbA1c ≤ 53 mmol/mol (7.0%)
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 11: Change in food intake (amount of calories, fat, carbohydrates, proteins etc.) based on intake registration data
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Mechanistic: Change in resection tissue findings in morphological features
Time frame: Week 12 after (re)DMR
Mechanistic: Change in resection tissue findings in functional level changes
Time frame: Week 12 after (re)DMR
Mechanistic: Change in resection tissue findings in cellular level changes
Time frame: Week 12 after (re)DMR
Mechanistic: Mean Changes in small intestinal biopsy gene expression
Time frame: Week 12 after (re)DMR
Mechanistic: Mean Changes in small intestinal biopsy metabolomics/proteomics
Time frame: Week 12 after (re)DMR
Mechanistic: Change in Plasma Citrulline
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Mechanistic: Change in Cystatin Value
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Aug 2026.
- Website for people that are interested in participating.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Drug AZD6234 for Managing Weight in Adults Who Are Obese or Overweight. These Participants May or May Not Also Have Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity, Overweight
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) in Obese Adults With Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D), Obesity (BMI>30)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jacques JG Bergman, MD, PhD principal investigator
Amsterdam UMC
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Revita® DMR Treatment in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) at 1 site in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 28 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Safety endpoint (time frame: 12 weeks post DMR and 12 weeks post retreatment with DMR). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Aug 2026.