Alzheimer DiseaseNCT06094192
Improving Memory in Alzheimer's Disease With Noninvasive Brain Stimulation
A study testing High definition transcranial electrical current stimulation in people with Alzheimer Disease, run by Boston University Charles River Campus at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The investigators will evaluate the theory that Alzheimer's disease-related memory impairment derives from the inefficient orchestration of rhythmic activity at the level of large-scale cortical networks. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 to 100 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Alzheimer Disease
- What is being tested?
- High definition transcranial electrical current stimulation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 204 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 20 Dec 2023to 31 May 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 to 100 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
All subjects. Age 50-100 years. We will equally recruit subjects with respect to gender, race, ethnicity, socioeconomic and other factors to allow the results of this research to yield the greatest generalizability.
Mild AD dementia. Meets probable AD dementia NIA-AA criteria 86; MoCA 10-25 85; performance on Uniform Data Set version 3 (UDS-3) delayed recall (Craft Story 21) and recognition (Benson Complex Figure) memory worse than 1.5 SD for age and education; worse than 1.5 SD for age and education in at least one other cognitive domain (e.g., language, executive functioning) based on other tests in the UDS-3. A summary of the NIA-AA criteria for AD dementia are that the patient has (1) dementia, such that cognitive or behavioral symptoms (a) are interfering with the ability to function at work or usual activities, (b) represent a decline from previous level of functioning, (c) are not explained by delirium or major psychiatric disorder, (d) are detected and diagnosed, and (e) involve a minimum of two domains including memory, executive function, visuospatial abilities, language, and personality or behavior or comportment; (2) insidious onset; (3) clear-cut history of worsening of cognition; (4) prominent cognitive deficits by history and examination from either (a) an amnestic presentation or (b) a non-amnestic presentation, which can be a language, visuospatial, or executive dysfunction presentation; and lastly (5) no (a) substantial concomitant cerebrovascular disease, (b) core features of Dementia with Lewy Bodies, (c) prominent features of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (FTD), (d) prominent features of primary progressive aphasia, or (e) evidence for another concurrent, active disorder or use of medication that could have a substantial effect on cognition. All diagnoses are made by the BU ADRC clinical core consensus and confirmed by Dr. Budson. The majority of patients will have a positive AD biomarker, either from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or positron emission tomography (PET). See also Additional Inclusion/Exclusion criteria below.
MCI due to AD. Meets MCI due to AD according to NIA-AA criteria 86; MoCA >18 85; performance on Uniform Data Set version 3 (UDS-3) delayed recall (Craft Story 21) and recognition (Benson Complex Figure) memory worse than 1.0 SD for age and education adjusted norms. A summary of the NIA-AA criteria for MCI due to AD are that there is (1) clinical concern reflecting a change in cognition reported by patient, informant, or clinician; (2) objective impairment in one or more domains, typically including memory; (3) preservation of independence in functional abilities; (4) not demented; (5) a rule out of vascular, traumatic, and medical causes of cognitive decline; (6) evidence of longitudinal decline in cognition, when feasible; (7) history consistent with AD genetic factors, where relevant. All diagnoses are made by the BU ADRC clinical core consensus and confirmed by Dr. Budson. The majority of patients will have a positive AD biomarker, either from CSF or PET. See also Additional Inclusion/Exclusion criteria below.
Healthy controls. Healthy controls will also be recruited from the BU ADRC and will be age, education, and gender matched to the AD patients. They will have a MoCA > 2585 and performance within 1.0 SD for age and education adjusted norms on Uniform Data Set version 3 (UDS-3). All "diagnoses" of healthy controls will be made by the BU ADRC clinical core consensus and confirmed by Dr. Budson. The majority of healthy controls will have a negative AD biomarker, either from CSF or PET. See also Additional Inclusion/Exclusion criteria below.
All subjects. Current conditions allowed: mild depression and/or anxiety not requiring hospitalization or medications other than what are listed below; hyperlipidemia; hypercholesterolemia; hypertension; heart disease; asthma; gastroesophageal reflux disease; edema; treated hypothyroidism; systemic vascular disease (but not stroke); dermatological disorders; ophthalmologic disorders. Prior conditions excluded: stroke, traumatic brain injury, other brain or systemic disorder that, in the opinion of Dr. Budson, has produced a permanent alteration of cognition. Current medications allowed: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors; cholinesterase inhibitors (for the patients with AD); statins; beta adrenergic blockers; bronchodilators; ace inhibitors; calcium channel blockers; angiotensin II receptor blockers; other antihypertensive agents; histamine-2 receptor antagonists; proton-pump inhibitors; diuretics; thyroid medications; aspirin; non-narcotic analgesics; antiplatelet agents; vitamins \& minerals; topical medications; eye drops.
Inclusion/exclusion criteria related to tasks, EEG and tACS. Subjects must have normal or corrected-to-normal vision, color vision, nonpregnant, no metal implants in head, no implanted electronic devices, no skin sensitivity, and no claustrophobia.
Additional exclusion criteria. Subjects will be excluded if they cannot understand the informed consent or the experimental procedures. Subjects will be excluded if they have a significant vision and/or hearing impairment which will prevent them from understanding the informed consent and from completing the experimental procedures.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
111 Cummington Mall. Room 264
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Robert MG Reinhart, PhD, 617-353-9481, rmgr@bu.edu
About this study
Official title: Personalized Synchronization of Cortical Rhythms to Improve Memory in Alzheimer's Disease
The investigators will evaluate the theory that Alzheimer's disease-related memory impairment derives from the inefficient orchestration of rhythmic activity at the level of large-scale cortical networks. The results as expected to elucidate AD-related pathophysiology and set groundwork for the development of drug-free interventions for improving memory in AD and related dementias.
Read the detailed description
The investigators hypothesize that AD-related memory impairments emerge from large-scale functional dysconnectivity, and by stimulating the brain noninvasively with extremely weak levels of electrical current, the investigators may be able to re-synchronize connectivity and stabilize or improve memory and cognitive function, measured behaviorally. The experimental intervention involves the application of low-intensity, high-definition, transcranial electrical current stimulation while subjects perform a variety of computer-based tasks that probe memory and cognitive function.
- Conditions
- Alzheimer Disease
- Being tested
- High definition transcranial electrical current stimulation
- Medical subject headings
- Alzheimer Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
High definition transcranial electrical current stimulationDevice
Low-intensity and safe, noninvasive application of electrical current to the human scalp with the goal of gradually modulating levels of neuronal excitability.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| active stimulation | Experimental | Memory performance data is collected during active brain stimulation and reported 1 year later Receives: Device: High definition transcranial electrical current stimulation |
| sham stimulation | Sham comparator | Memory performance data is collected during sham brain stimulation and reported 1 year later Receives: Device: High definition transcranial electrical current stimulation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Memory performance (active stimulation condition)
The accuracy of task performance on memory test
Measured: Time Frame: Memory performance data is collected during active brain stimulation and reported 1 year later
Memory performance (sham stimulation condition)
The accuracy of task performance on memory test
Measured: Time Frame: Memory performance data is collected during sham brain stimulation and reported 1 year later
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Oct 2023
- Study start20 Dec 2023
- Primary completion31 May 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion31 May 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Alzheimer DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 204 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Boston University Charles River Campus
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Robert Reinhart, Boston University Charles River Campus
- Investigators
- Robert Reinhart, PhD, Principal investigator, Boston University Charles River Campus
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06094192
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 4555_2
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 14 Oct 2023
- Last updated
- 23 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Personalized Synchronization of Cortical Rhythms to Improve Memory in Alzheimer's Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06094192
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 4555_2
- Conditions
- Alzheimer Disease
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 204 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Boston University Charles River CampusUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 20 Dec 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 May 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 May 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 23 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The investigators will evaluate the theory that Alzheimer's disease-related memory impairment derives from the inefficient orchestration of rhythmic activity at the level of large-scale cortical networks. The results as expected to elucidate AD-related pathophysiology and set groundwork for the development of drug-free interventions for improving memory in AD and related dementias.
Detailed description
The investigators hypothesize that AD-related memory impairments emerge from large-scale functional dysconnectivity, and by stimulating the brain noninvasively with extremely weak levels of electrical current, the investigators may be able to re-synchronize connectivity and stabilize or improve memory and cognitive function, measured behaviorally. The experimental intervention involves the application of low-intensity, high-definition, transcranial electrical current stimulation while subjects perform a variety of computer-based tasks that probe memory and cognitive function.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| active stimulation | Experimental | Device: High definition transcranial electrical current stimulationMemory performance data is collected during active brain stimulation and reported 1 year later |
| sham stimulation | Sham comparator | Device: High definition transcranial electrical current stimulationMemory performance data is collected during sham brain stimulation and reported 1 year later |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| High definition transcranial electrical current stimulationLow-intensity and safe, noninvasive application of electrical current to the human scalp with the goal of gradually modulating levels of neuronal excitability. | Device | active stimulation, sham stimulation |
Primary outcome
Memory performance (active stimulation condition)
Time frame: Time Frame: Memory performance data is collected during active brain stimulation and reported 1 year later
The accuracy of task performance on memory test
Memory performance (sham stimulation condition)
Time frame: Time Frame: Memory performance data is collected during sham brain stimulation and reported 1 year later
The accuracy of task performance on memory test
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Sep 2026.
Related trials for Alzheimer Disease
RecruitingPhase 2
Neuroplasticity Enhancement From Cognitive Training Reinforced by Psilocybin
Alzheimer's Disease
Not yet recruiting
Acupressure as Long-term Intervention to Slow the Progression of Early/Mild Alzheimer's Disease
Alzheimer's Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Effectiveness and Safety of Disease-Modifying Therapy for Alzheimer's Disease: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
Alzheimer's Disease (AD)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of KarXT + KarX-EC for the Treatment of Agitation Associated With Alzheimer's Disease (ADAGIO-1)
Alzheimer Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Trontinemab in Cognitively Unimpaired Individuals at Risk for Progression to Symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease
Alzheimer's Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Robert Reinhart, PhD principal investigator
Boston University Charles River Campus
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing High definition transcranial electrical current stimulation in people with Alzheimer Disease, run by Boston University Charles River Campus at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Robert MG Reinhart, PhD ((617) 353-9481, rmgr@bu.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Memory performance (active stimulation condition) (time frame: Time Frame: Memory performance data is collected during active brain stimulation and reported 1 year later). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Sep 2026.