Prospective Study of Sensation and Satisfaction in Cancer and Transgender Mastectomy Patients

SIGNIFICANCE

During removal of breast tissue that is required for mastectomy procedures, the nerves that supply the breast skin and the nipple areola complex (NAC) are sacrificed. This results in fair to poor sensation in 50-90% of patients, decreased patient satisfaction and increased risk of injury. Further, when nerves are transected, axons sprout from the proximal free nerve end and form neuromas that cause chronic pain (CP) and phantom pain (PP) in ~60% and 30-80% of patients, respectively. With the implementation of advanced peripheral nerve surgery techniques, it has become possible to preserve, transfer and graft nerves to the insensate areas of the reconstructed breast/chest to provide sensation in cancer and transgender patients. Multiple studies have shown increased patient satisfaction and sensation after reinnervation as compared to no reinnervation. However, there are several limitations to currently published clinical outcome studies: 1)Lack of comprehensive objective outcome measures to test all aspects of the somatosensory nervous system. No study to date has utilized the protocol for Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) that was developed by the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS) and provides a validated and standardized approach to test all nociceptive and non- nociceptive sensory functions including small unmyelinated C fibers, myelinated A-alpha, A-beta, and A-delta fibers. This comprehensive, standardized and validated approach has been adopted internationally to evaluate sensory conditions and allows for objective outcome assessment and comparison. 2)Gap in knowledge regarding reinnervation outcomes after implant- based reconstruction. Most sensory studies were performed in patients undergoing autologous reconstruction with only few studies discussing reinnervation in the context of implant- based breast reconstruction. However, the most common type of reconstruction after breast cancer remains implant based reconstruction accounting for 80% of breast reconstruction cases. Therefore, it is important to investigate this population further to determine whether reinnervation is successful and should be offered to this patient population. 3)Limited understanding of sensory outcome after transgender mastectomy. Sensory outcome is important to >90% of patients undergoing transgender mastectomy with free nipple grafting (FNG), which is the most common procedure performed in transgender patients. Our team has described chest reinnervation in this patient population with good sensory outcomes. However, a prospective clinical trial with comprehensive outcome measurements including QST and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) with control group is required to further examine the role of reinnervation in transgender chest surgery. 4)Insufficient prospective data on PP and CP. There are very few prospective studies reporting the incidence of PP and CP after cancer and transgender mastectomy and the results are inconsistent. Further, the percentage of chronic breast/chest pain patients with true neuropathic pain (NP) is unclear. In addition, although we know from other patient populations (amputees) that nerve reconstruction significantly decreases the incidence of CP and PP, there is no data on whether breast reinnervation influences the percentage of patients who will develop these conditions. 5)Prospective comparison of reinnervation outcomes between autologous reconstruction, implant reconstruction and gender mastectomy has not been performed. Breast reinnervation has rapidly evolved and is becoming a widely employed addition to breast and chest reconstruction. However, it remains unclear how these patient populations compare, and which patients obtain good sensory outcome warranting the longer operative times and higher cost of reinnervation.

The broad objective of this proposal is to prospectively compare objective data on sensory outcomes using QST and PROMs in patients undergoing reinnervation after A) nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM) and implant reconstruction B) NSM and autologous reconstruction C) gender mastectomy with FNG and D) control patients matched by surgical procedure, age, BMI and mastectomy weight. This preliminary data will be used to apply for government funding (NIH K23) to conduct a randomized controlled multi- center clinical trial to evaluate reinnervation versus no reinnervation after mastectomy in cancer and transgender care. The objectives of this larger scale study are to A) obtain objective QST sensory measurements and PROM outcomes across institutions, B) determine the chances of reinnervation success based on variables such as patient factors (age, comorbidities, adjuvant treatment), mastectomy factors (incision type, mastectomy weight), breast reconstruction techniques (retropectoral, prepectoral, direct- to implant, expander reconstruction, implant size, implant type, types of autologous reconstruction), chest reconstruction techniques and nerve transfer techniques (number of nerves, length of allograft, size of allograft etc.) C) perform a cost- benefit analysis and D) develop evidence-based guidelines for breast/ chest reinnervation after mastectomy.

SPECIFIC AIMS

All aims will analyze and compare the following patient groups: a) NSM and implant reconstruction with reinnervation b) NSM with autologous reconstruction with reinnervation c) gender mastectomy with FNG with reinnervation d) controls matched by surgical procedure (implant, autologous, transgender), BMI, age, gender and mastectomy weight.

Aim 1A: Analysis of all aspects of sensation with QST. Aim 1B: Evaluation of timing of return of sensation. Aim 2: Assessment of CP and PP. Aim 3: Analysis of patient satisfaction.

HYPOTHESIS

Breast reinnervation does not improve sensation/patient satisfaction as compared to mastectomy with no reinnervation. Further, there is no difference in prevalence of CP and PP.