AzTrials
AzTrials

Centric Occlusion - Centric Relation Discrepancy (Disorder)NCT06095856

Evaluation of Masseter and Anterior Temporalis Muscles Activity After Locating Centric Relation

A study testing Leaf Gauge, Lucia Jig and Kois Deprogrammer in people with Centric Occlusion - Centric Relation Discrepancy (Disorder), run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Statement of the Problem: To create optimum maxillomandibular relationships, ease discomfort, and restore function, occlusal devices are used, therefore, these devices are of great importance in the field of prosthodontics. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 50 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Leaf Gauge, Lucia Jig and Kois Deprogrammer
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
25 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
1 Nov 2023to 31 Dec 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 50 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • (20-50) years old.
  • Medically free.
  • Full set of dentition (excluding the third molar).

Who cannot join

  • Patients with bone or joint diseases.
  • Patients with TMD.
  • Patients with anterior cross-bite.
  • Patients with open bite (dental or skeletal). -Patients with teeth mobility.
  • Patients with parafunctional habits.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Faculty of Dentistry - Cairo University

    Giza, 4240310

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of Masseter and Anterior Temporalis Muscles Activity After Using Different Methods to Locate Centric Relation in Healthy Adults: A Randomized Cross-Over Clinical Trial

Statement of the Problem:

To create optimum maxillomandibular relationships, ease discomfort, and restore function, occlusal devices are used, therefore, these devices are of great importance in the field of prosthodontics.

Literature is scarce regarding the effect of various methods used in locating centric relation on muscle activity, in addition to which method is most accepted by the patients for whom centric relation is being located.

Null hypothesis:

There will be no difference in Masseter and Anterior Temporalis muscles activity and patient satisfaction after using the Leaf Gauge, The Lucia Jig and the Kois Deprogrammer.

Read the detailed description

Research Question:

Which of the investigated methods will result in lower masseter and anterior temporalis muscles activity reading after locating centric relation in healthy adults, and will be more accepted by the patient?

Rationale for Carrying out the Trial: For the patient:

The results of the trial will identify the most effective and patient friendly method for locating a centric position, which instructions are easy to follow and apply. Furthermore, reaching a centric position, using one of the investigated methods, will help ensure orthopedic stability before, during and after the treatment process.

For the dentist:

The results of the trial will help the dentist decide on which is the most reliable, valid and least technique sensitive method to choose when facing clinical situations requiring occlusal analysis, recording the patient's CR, or occlusal equilibration.

Choice of Comparators:

The control for the proposed study is a negative control. sEMG readings will be recorded before (-ve control) and after using any of the investigated methods and locating centric relation. Comparison between the pre and post readings for each method used will allow for evaluation of efficacy and reliability for each of the investigated methods.

Another reason for using a negative control is that, among the methods currently in the literature, not a single one was labelled the gold standard, nor a consensus has been reached as to which method checks most of the requirements of the ideal device used to locate the centric relation. Each method still has its advantages, disadvantages and most importantly, indications and contraindications.

Aim of the Study:

The aim of the proposed study is to evaluate Masseter and Anterior Temporalis muscles activity after using different methods: the Leaf Gauge, the Lucia Jig and the Kois Deprogrammer to locate centric relation in healthy adults (Primary Outcome). Furthermore, the study aims to evaluate the patient satisfaction after using each of the investigated methods (Secondary Outcome).

PICOS:

Population: Healthy adults with no history of TMD. Interventions:

I1: The Leaf Gauge I2: The Lucia Jig I3: The Kois Deprogrammer Control: - (-ve Control)

Outcomes:

Primary (O1): Masseter and Anterior Temporalis muscles activity Secondary (O2): Patient satisfaction Study Design: Randomized cross-over clinical trial

Interventions:

Interventions will be carried out by the principal investigator.

Initial examination and primary impressions:

Full medical and dental history will be taken from the participants and TMJ examination will be done to ensure that the eligibility criteria will be met.

Intraoral scans for the upper and lower arch and the buccal bite will be done for each participant. Impressions will be sent to the lab for the fabrication of the Kois Deprogrammer.

For Group Lf-La-Ks:

On the first day, baseline muscle activity will be measured by the sEMG, then, the leaf gauge will be used till centric relation is located, then, muscle activity will be recorded once more. On the second day, baseline muscle activity will be measured by the sEMG, then, the Lucia jig will be used till centric relation is located, then, muscle activity will be recorded once more.

On the third day, baseline muscle activity will be measured by the sEMG, then, the Kois deprogrammer will be used till centric relation is located, then, muscle activity will be recorded once more.

Patient satisfaction questionnaire will be handed-out to the participants and filled-out at the end of the third day.

For Group La-Ks-Lf:

On the first day, baseline muscle activity will be measured by the sEMG, then, the Lucia jig will be used till centric relation is located, then, muscle activity will be recorded once more. On the second day, baseline muscle activity will be measured by the sEMG, then, the Kois deprogrammer will be used till centric relation is located, then, muscle activity will be recorded once more. On the third day, baseline muscle activity will be measured by the sEMG, then, the leaf gauge will be used till centric relation is located, then, muscle activity will be recorded once more.

Patient satisfaction questionnaire will be handed-out to the participants and filled-out at the end of the third day.

For Group Ks-Lf-La:

On the first day, baseline muscle activity will be measured by the sEMG, then, the Koid deprogrammer will be used till centric relation is located, then, muscle activity will be recorded once more. On the second day, baseline muscle activity will be measured by the sEMG, then, the leaf gauge will be used till centric relation is located, then, muscle activity will be recorded once more. On the third day, baseline muscle activity will be measured by the sEMG, then, the Lucia jig will be used till centric relation is located, then, muscle activity will be recorded once more.

Patient satisfaction questionnaire will be handed-out to the participants and filled-out at the end of the third day.

Sample Size:

Sample size was calculated using a previous study as reference. This study aimed to compare the muscle activity of masseter and anterior temporalis muscles after using different methods to achieve centric relation in normal subjects According to this study, the response of matched pairs is normally distributed with standard deviation 4.01. If the estimated difference in the mean response of matched pairs is 4.5, the minimally accepted sample size is 8, with probability (power) 0.8. The Type I error probability associated with this test is 0.05. Total sample size was increased to 10 per group (Total sample size will be 30 for all groups). Sample size was calculated by using PS Software.

Data collection methods Muscle activity reading before and after using the investigated devices to locate centric relation will be recorded and logged into a Microsoft Excel sheet. Telephone numbers of all patients included the study will be recorded as a part of the written consent. All patients will be given a phone call at least a day before they must show up for each procedure. Analysis will be performed on a per-protocol basis; participants who do not show-up will not be included in the analysis.

Data management:

All data will be entered and saved electronically. Patient files are to be stored in numerical order and stored in secured file. Data will be encrypted using a password. All data will be maintained after completion of the study.

Statistical methods:

Handling of numerical/quantitative variables: Numerical data will be explored for normality by checking the data distribution using Kolmogorov- Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests. Data will be presented as mean \& standard deviation. If data will be normally distributed comparison between 2 different groups will be performed by using Independent t-test, comparison between 2 related groups will be performed by using Paired t-test, while comparison between more than 2 groups will be performed by using One Way ANOVA test followed by Tukey's Post Hoc test for multiple comparisons. If data will be non- parametric data comparison between 2 different groups will be performed by using Mann- Whitney test, comparison between 2 related groups will be performed by using Wilcoxon Signed Rank test, while comparison between more than 2 groups will be performed by using Kruskal-Wallis test.

Handling of categorial / qualitative variables: Data will be presented as frequency and percentages. All comparisons will be performed by using Chi square test.

Monitoring No formal data monitoring committee will be needed since it is a study with known minimal risks.

Harms Patients will be inquired about any possible side effects after using any of the investigated methods. Any temporary or permanent adverse effect will be recorded and documented. Post-operative pain is a minor side effect that can be associated with prolonged mouth opening; it will be managed by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and muscle relaxants in case of unbearable pain.

Audit No formal auditing committee is available.

Research Ethics Approval:

This protocol and the template informed consent form were reviewed by the Ethics Committee of Scientific Research - Faculty of Dentistry - Cairo University, and approved on July 31st, 2023. Approval number 1723.

Protocol Amendments:

Any modifications to the protocol which may have an impact on the conduct of the study, potential benefit of the patient or may affect patient safety, including changes of study objectives, study design, sample sizes, study procedures, or significant administrative aspects will require a formal amendment to the protocol. Such amendment will be agreed upon by the Council of Fixed Prosthodontics Department.

Informed Consent:

Principal investigator will introduce the trial to patients and provide full explanation of its aim and benefits in plain language. Patients will then be able to have an informed discussion with the investigator. Investigator will obtain written consent from patients willing to participate in the trial. All consent forms will be translated into Arabic.

Confidentiality:

All study-related information will be stored securely. All participant information will be stored in locked cloud-based files. All reports, data collection, processes, and administrative forms will be identified by a coded ID [identification] number only to maintain participant confidentiality. All records that contain names or other personal identifiers will be stored separately from study records identified by code number. All local databases will be secured with password-protected access systems.

Declaration of Interest:

No Conflict of interest is currently present. If there will be any conflict of interest it will be declared.

Access to Data:

The principal investigator and the supervisors will be given access to the data sets. All data sets will be password protected. To ensure confidentiality, data dispersed to project team members will be blinded of any identifying participant information.

Post-trial Care:

All patients will be followed up for one week after the clinical trial is over.

Dissemination Policy:

  • Study results will be published in an indexed journal (Scopus or Web of Science) as partial fulfillment of the requirements for PhD degree in Fixed Prosthodontics.
  • Topics suggested for presentation or publication will be circulated to the authors.

Biological Specimens:

No biological specimens will be collected from the study participants in the proposed study.

Statement of Originality:

The work contained in this protocol has not been previously submitted for a degree or diplomat in any higher education institution.

Being tested
Leaf Gauge, Lucia Jig, Kois Deprogrammer
Keywords
centric relation, temporomandibular joint stability

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Leaf GaugeDevice

    Occlusal device used to locate centric relation of the jaws

  • Lucia JigDevice

    Occlusal device used to locate centric relation of the jaws

  • Kois DeprogrammerDevice

    Occlusal device used to locate centric relation of the jaws and deprogram jaw muscles

Study groups in NCT06095856
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Lf-La-KsExperimentalOn the first day, baseline muscle activity will be measured by the sEMG, then, the leaf gauge will be used till centric relation is located, then, muscle activity will be recorded once more. On the second day, baseline muscle activity will be measured by the sEMG, then, the Lucia jig will be used till centric relation is located, then, muscle activity will be recorded once more. On the third day, baseline muscle activity will be measured by the sEMG, then, the Kois deprogrammer will be used till centric relation is located, then, muscle activity will be recorded once more. Patient satisfaction questionnaire will be handed-out to the participants and filled-out at the end of the third day.
Receives: Device: Leaf Gauge; Device: Lucia Jig; Device: Kois Deprogrammer
La-Ks-LfExperimentalOn the first day, baseline muscle activity will be measured by the sEMG, then, the Lucia jig will be used till centric relation is located, then, muscle activity will be recorded once more. On the second day, baseline muscle activity will be measured by the sEMG, then, the Kois deprogrammer will be used till centric relation is located, then, muscle activity will be recorded once more. On the third day, baseline muscle activity will be measured by the sEMG, then, the leaf gauge will be used till centric relation is located, then, muscle activity will be recorded once more. Patient satisfaction questionnaire will be handed-out to the participants and filled-out at the end of the third day.
Receives: Device: Leaf Gauge; Device: Lucia Jig; Device: Kois Deprogrammer
Ks-Lf-LaExperimentalOn the first day, baseline muscle activity will be measured by the sEMG, then, the Koid deprogrammer will be used till centric relation is located, then, muscle activity will be recorded once more. On the second day, baseline muscle activity will be measured by the sEMG, then, the leaf gauge will be used till centric relation is located, then, muscle activity will be recorded once more. On the third day, baseline muscle activity will be measured by the sEMG, then, the Lucia jig will be used till centric relation is located, then, muscle activity will be recorded once more. Patient satisfaction questionnaire will be handed-out to the participants and filled-out at the end of the third day.
Receives: Device: Leaf Gauge; Device: Lucia Jig; Device: Kois Deprogrammer

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Muscle Activity

    Surface electromyogram will be used to measure right and left Masseter and Anterior Temporalis muscles activity (MicroVolt)

    Measured: immediately after the intervention

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Satisfaction assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale

    Will be measured using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), minimum value is 1 (completely unsatisfied) and maximum value is 10 (completely satisfied)

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 month

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Oct 2023
  2. Study start1 Nov 2023
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2023
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Model description
The trial will be a "Cross-Over" clinical trial, with a wash-out period of 24 hours between investigated interventions, to set superiority, using 3 randomized groups of participants, and an allocation ratio of 1:1:1.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
25 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06095856
Sponsor's protocol ID
1723
Status last verified
Feb 2024
First submitted
11 Oct 2023
Last updated
9 Feb 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Carr AB, Donegan SJ, Christensen LV, Ziebert GJ. An electrognathographic study of aspects of 'deprogramming' of human jaw muscles. J Oral Rehabil. 1991 Mar;18(2):143-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1991.tb00041.x.

    PubMed 2037936
  • Hassall D. Centric relation and increasing the occlusal vertical dimension: concepts and clinical techniques - part one. Br Dent J. 2021 Jan;230(1):17-22. doi: 10.1038/s41415-020-2502-x. Epub 2021 Jan 8.

    PubMed 33420450
  • Hassall D. Centric relation and increasing the occlusal vertical dimension: concepts and clinical techniques - part two. Br Dent J. 2021 Jan;230(2):83-89. doi: 10.1038/s41415-020-2593-4. Epub 2021 Jan 22.

    PubMed 33483662
  • Adamczyk, Ł. and Więckiewicz, M. (2017) 'Clinical aspects of application of selected anterior deprogrammers', Protetyka Stomatologiczna, 67(4), pp. 333-341. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0010.6860.

  • Alqutaibi, A. Y. and Aboalrejal, A. N. (2015) 'Types of Occlusal Splint in Management of Temporomandibular Disorders (TMD)', Journal of Arthritis, 04(04). doi: 10.4172/2167-7921.1000176.

  • Derwich M, Pawlowska E. Do the Mandibular Condyles Change Their Positions within Glenoid Fossae after Occlusal Splint Therapy Combined with Physiotherapy in Patients Diagnosed with Temporomandibular Joint Disorders? A Prospective Case Control Study. J Pers Med. 2022 Feb 10;12(2):254. doi: 10.3390/jpm12020254.

    PubMed 35207741
  • Gaikwad, A. M., Nadgere, J. and Tamore, S. (2022) 'Effect of muscle deprogrammers on muscle activity of masseter and temporalis muscles using surface electromyography: A randomized crossover clinical study', Journal of International Oral Health, 14(1), pp. 26-33. doi: 10.4103/JIOH.JIOH_208_21.

  • Jayne, D. (2006) 'A deprogrammer for occlusal analysis and simplified accurate case mounting', Journal of Cosmetic Dentistry, 21(4), pp. 96-102.

  • Land MF, Peregrina A. Anterior deprogramming device fabrication using a thermoplastic material. J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Dec;90(6):608-10. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.09.011.

    PubMed 14668765
  • Lee DJ, Wiens JP, Ference J, Donatelli D, Smith RM, Dye BD, Obrez A, Lang LA. Assessment of occlusion curriculum in predoctoral dental education: report from ACP Task Force on Occlusion Education. J Prosthodont. 2012 Oct;21(7):578-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00876.x.

    PubMed 23130597
  • Lucia, V. O. (1964) 'A Technique for Recording Centric Relation', Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 14(3), pp. 492-505.

  • Machado NA, Henriques JC, Lelis ER, Tavares M, Almeida Gde A, Fernandes Neto AJ. Identification of occlusal prematurity by clinical examination and cone-beam computed tomography. Braz Dent J. 2013;24(1):64-7. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201301974.

    PubMed 23657416
  • Sribabu, E. and Behera, S. S. P. (2018) 'Conceptions and misconceptions about centric relation: A Review of Literature', International Journal of Preventive and Clinical Dental Research, 5(2), pp. 44-48.

  • Wiens JP, Goldstein GR, Andrawis M, Choi M, Priebe JW. Defining centric relation. J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Jul;120(1):114-122. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.10.008. Epub 2018 Mar 8.

    PubMed 29526300
  • Wiens JP, Priebe JW. Occlusal stability. Dent Clin North Am. 2014 Jan;58(1):19-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2013.09.014.

    PubMed 24286644

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Leaf Gauge, Lucia Jig and Kois Deprogrammer in people with Centric Occlusion - Centric Relation Discrepancy (Disorder), run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Muscle Activity (time frame: immediately after the intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06095856, which also lists 18 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Feb 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in