ViolenceNCT06099262
GenPMTO Evaluation
An observational study of Violence and Emotional Adjustment, run by The Behavioural Insights Team at 3 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
This project is a multi-stage evaluation of GenPMTO (Generation Parent Management Training - Oregon Model). GenPMTO is a parenting programme which involves trained practitioners using active teaching approaches (such as group problem-solving, role-play, and video modelling) to support caregivers in using positive… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 8 to 14 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Violence, Emotional Adjustment, Parenting
- What is being tested?
- GenPMTO
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- How many people
- 36 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 11 Sep 2023to Mar 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 8 to 14 years
- All sexes
- Child
Study population: Caregivers of young people aged 8-14, who have been identified as being at risk of committing violent acts and/or entering into the criminal justice system.
Inclusion Criteria - Caregivers are eligible to participate in the feasibility study (including receiving GenPMTO) if they:
- Have a child or young person (CYP) between the ages of 8-14.
- Are the primary caregiver (i.e. spend the most time with the CYP and are available to care for them).
- Live within one of the boroughs in which GenPMTO is being delivered (during the feasibility study).
And, if one of or more of the following is present:
- CYPs have engaged in criminal behaviour, such as breaking the law or "offending behaviour" - for both non-violent and violent crimes.
- CYPs have engaged in violent and challenging behaviour (including within the home, e.g. against parents and/or siblings).
- CYPs have been reported as bullying other individual(s) in or outside of school settings.
- CYPs have low attendance at school (<50% within the last academic year).
- CYPs have been excluded from school within the last academic year.
- CYPs are engaged in substance abuse/misuse (e.g. drugs, alcohol)
- CYPs are at risk of involvement by gangs.
- CYPs are at risk of exploitation, or negative influence, by criminal peers.
- CYPs have a sibling(s) that has entered into the criminal justice system.
Exclusion Criteria - Caregivers will be excluded from the feasibility study it at least any of the following are present:
- Caregiver(s) have received a parenting programme in the last two months, or are currently receiving one.
- Caregiver(s) and CYP does not have working proficiency in English, such that participation in GenPMTO and research activities would be unfeasible.
- Family has plans to move out of the borough within the 10-14 week delivery timeline, and thus may not be available for full delivery of GenPMTO during the feasibility study phase.
- Severe developmental delay for caregiver or CYP which may prevent caregiver from attending GenPMTO delivery sessions, implementing GenPMTO parenting strategies, or participating in evaluation.
- Caregiver(s) and/or CYPs are actively homicidal, suicidal or psychotic.
- Problem sexual behaviour is the central behavioural concern for child/young person.
- Significant child protection concern (i.e. basic needs of children are not being met by caregivers.
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
United Kingdom3 sites, 3 recruiting
- Recruiting
London Borough of Barking and Dagenham
London
- Recruiting
London Borough of Brent
London
- Recruiting
London Borough of Tower Hamlets
London
About this study
Official title: GenPMTO - Adaptation and Feasibility Study
This project is a multi-stage evaluation of GenPMTO (Generation Parent Management Training - Oregon Model). GenPMTO is a parenting programme which involves trained practitioners using active teaching approaches (such as group problem-solving, role-play, and video modelling) to support caregivers in using positive parenting strategies at home. The programme is designed to improve parenting practices, as well as a range of outcomes for young people, including improving academic performance, reducing school exclusions, and reducing offending and criminal behaviour. The version of the programme investigated in this project is delivered to groups of parents.
Read the detailed description
This project represents the first attempt to deliver and evaluate GenPMTO in the UK. To do so, the Ending Youth Violence Lab, at the Behavioural Insights Team, is conducting a multi-stage evaluation, involving delivering the intervention across three London boroughs, with a focus on caregivers of 8-14-year-old children and young people (CYPs), who are identified to have risk factors associated with involvement in violence.
To design this project, the Lab has collaborated with two partners. The first is ISII (Implementation Sciences International, Inc.), a research-based, non-profit organisation based in the USA, which implements the GenPMTO programme, in partnership with the programme developers. ISII also trains community practitioners in its use across the world. The second partner is Barnardo's, the UK's largest children's charity, and the delivery partner for the project.
This entry refers to the first 2 stages of the project, which will run concurrently:
Stage 1 - Adaptation and training
- The purpose of this Stage is to prepare for initial delivery and the feasibility testing of delivery, by making any adaptations that may be necessary for the UK context and beginning practitioner training.
- The research objectives of this Stage firstly focus on identifying whether the programme may require adaptations to fit into the UK context and identifying and justifying appropriate adaptations. Secondly, the investigators want to identify whether sufficient numbers of practitioners can be recruited and trained within the budget of the project, and to identify the optimal approach to recruitment and training of future practitioner cohorts to allow delivery at a larger scale.
Stage 2 - Feasibility study
The purpose of this Stage is to understand the feasibility of delivering GenPMTO to the caregivers of children who have been identified as being at risk of violence, through testing recruitment, retention, fidelity, etc. The investigators will also conduct further adaptation to the programme as necessary, responding to what we learn from practitioners and caregivers who have experienced the programme for the first time.
The specific research objectives here focus on:
- Feasibility - Can Barnardo's recruit and retain caregivers of children who meet inclusion criteria and are at risk of youth violence, and deliver the programme withfidelity?
- Acceptability - Is the GenPMTO programme seen as acceptable and valuable by caregivers and practitioners in a UK context?
- Evaluability - Firstly, is there sufficient demand and capacity to deliver GenPMTO at a scale required for a randomised control trial? Secondly, is it feasible to collect outcome data from participants, which would support robust outcome data collection procedures during a pilot and/or efficacy trial?
This will involve delivering the programme in 3 London boroughs, and collecting a range of survey data and conducting qualitative interviews with caregivers and with practitioners to explore the above questions. The investigators will collect pre- and post-programme outcome data using a range of self-report measures, to explore the potential for future robust evaluation (rather than to assess programme impact).
- Conditions
- Violence, Emotional Adjustment, Parenting, Parent-Child Relations
- Being tested
- GenPMTO
- Keywords
- young people, youth violence, parenting programme
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
GenPMTOBehavioural
GenPMTO is a parenting programme which involves trained practitioners using active teaching approaches (such as group problem-solving, role-play, and video modelling) to support caregivers in using positive parenting strategies at home. The programme is designed to improve parenting practices, as well as a range of outcomes for young people, including improving academic performance, reducing school exclusions, and reducing offending and criminal behaviour. The version of the programme investigated in this project is delivered to groups of parents.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Tower Hamlets 1 | Delivering the GenPMTO programme to one group of caregivers within the Tower Hamlets borough. Receives: Behavioral: GenPMTO | |
| Tower Hamlets 2 | Delivering the GenPMTO programme to a second group of caregivers within the Tower Hamlets borough. Receives: Behavioral: GenPMTO | |
| Brent 1 | Delivering the GenPMTO programme to one group of caregivers within the Brent borough. Receives: Behavioral: GenPMTO | |
| Brent 2 | Delivering the GenPMTO programme to a second group of caregivers within the Brent borough. Receives: Behavioral: GenPMTO | |
| Barking & Dagenham 1 | Delivering the GenPMTO programme to one group of caregivers within the Barking \& Dagenham borough. Receives: Behavioral: GenPMTO | |
| Barking & Dagenham 2 | Delivering the GenPMTO programme to a second group of caregivers within the Barking \& Dagenham borough. Receives: Behavioral: GenPMTO |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of practitioners recruited to deliver GenPMTO
This will involve calculating, as a percentage, the number of recruited practitioners, compared to the target.
Measured: Prior to delivery of the intervention
Proportion of practitioners enrolled in training to deliver GenPMTO
This will involve calculating, as a percentage, the number of practitioners enrolled in training, compared to the target.
Measured: Throughout delivery of the intervention - approximately 5 months
Number of referrals received for caregivers to receive GenPMTO
This will involve identifying the total count of referrals received during the feasibility study, as well the mean and standard deviation of monthly referral totals across the feasibility study.
Measured: Prior to delivery of the intervention
Proportion of referred caregivers deemed eligible for GenPMTO
This will involve calculating, as a percentage, the number of caregivers deemed eligible for GenPMTO, compared to to the total number of referred caregivers.
Measured: Prior to delivery of the intervention
Proportion of eligible caregivers who are offered GenPMTO who accept this offer (take-up of services)
This will involve calculating, as a percentage, the number of caregivers who consent to take part in the feasibility study, compared to to the total number of caregivers who are considered eligible to receive and are offered the programme.
Measured: Prior to delivery of the intervention
Retention / drop-out rates of caregivers receiving GenPMTO
This will involve calculating, as a percentage, the number of caregivers who complete a program, compared to the total number of caregivers who consent to receiving GenPMTO
Measured: Throughout delivery of the intervention - approximately 5 months
Retention / drop-out rates of practitioners delivering GenPMTO
This will involve calculating, as a percentage, the number of practitioners who have completed relevant training and are able to deliver GenPMTO, compared to the total number of practitioners who were enrolled in training.
Measured: Throughout delivery of the intervention - approximately 5 months
Attendance rate at GenPMTO sessions
This will involve calculating, as a percentage, the number of caregivers who attended each GenPMTO session, compared to the number of caregivers who were expected (i.e. based on caregiver take-up/enrollment) to attend these sessions, as well the mean and standard deviation across the feasibility study.
Measured: Throughout delivery of the intervention - approximately 5 months
Caregivers' perception of the quality of the content and delivery
This will involve calculating the mean and standard deviation of scores, based on a short feedback survey.
Measured: Within 1 month after the end of the intervention
Programme dosage data
This will involve calculating the mean percentage of actual content delivered in GenPMTO sessions to a cohort of caregivers, compared to the amount of planned content to be delivered.
Measured: Throughout delivery of the intervention - approximately 5 months
Ratings of practitioner fidelity
This will involve calculating the mean of practitioners' fidelity scores whilst delivering a full GenPMTO programme. Fidelity is measured using the Fidelity of Implementation (FIMP) Rating System system (expert assessment of videotaped sessions). Each session is assessed on a 9 point scale (1 referring to 'needs work', and 9 referring to 'good work').
Measured: Throughout delivery of the intervention - approximately 5 months
Parenting approach
Parenting Practices Interview (self-reported measure)
This is a 64 item measure, with responses measured on a 1-7 Likert scale. Total scores range from 64 to 448, with higher scores indicating improved parenting practices.
Measured: Within 1 month after the end of the intervention
Parental self-efficacy
Parental Locus of Control-Short Form Revised (self-report)
This is a 24 item measure, with responses measured on a 1-5 Likert scale. Total scores range from 24 to 120, with higher scores indicating greater parental self-efficacy.
Measured: Within 1 month after the end of the intervention
Behavioural problems
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (parent report of child)
The overall (five-subscale) SDQ score ranges from 0 to 50, with a higher score indicating abnormal behaviours. The Total Difficulties score ranges from 0 to 40. The externalising score ranges from 0 to 20 and is the sum of the conduct and hyperactivity scales. The internalising score ranges from 0 to 20 and is the sum of the emotional and peer problems scales. Higher scores indicate abnormal behaviours.
Measured: Within 1 month after the end of the intervention
Behavioural problems
Eyberg Child Behaviour Inventory (parent report of child)
7-point Likert scale, from 1 ('Never Occurs') to 7 ('Always Occurs') and a Yes/No Problem scale. Individual Intensity Score items are summed up, with resultant scores ranging from 36 to 252. For each item, the parents' response regarding whether the behaviour is a problem for them ('Yes' = 1 , 'No' = 0) is also summed to create the Problem Score, ranging from 0 to 36.
Measured: Within 1 month after the end of the intervention
Offending behaviour - Variety
Young people are asked to report on offending behaviours they have participated in.
Variety of delinquency score:
Sum the number of items the respondent answers 'yes' to:
Yes = 1 No = 0
Produces a score that ranges from 0-19, where a higher score indicates a higher variety of delinquency.
Measured: Within 1 month after the end of the intervention
Offending behaviour - Volume
Self-reported delinquency scale (child self-report measure)
Young people are asked to report on offending behaviours they have participated in.
Volume of delinquency score:
Summing the point values when respondents report a number of times. Point values are assigned as follows:
Once = 1 Twice = 2 3 times = 3 4 times = 4 5 times = 5 Between 6 and 10 times = 6 More than 10 times = 11
Produces a score that ranges from 0 to 11 for each delinquent behaviour, where a higher score indicates a higher volume of delinquency
Measured: Within 1 month after the end of the intervention
Victimisation
Victimisation sub-scale of the Problem Behaviour Frequency Scale (child self-report measure)
Produces a score ranging from 6-36 achieved by summing scores of the two subscales, where a higher score indicates a higher frequency of problem behaviours
Measured: Within 1 month after the end of the intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Oct 2023
- Study start11 Sep 2023
- Primary completionMar 2024 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for ViolenceStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Behavioural Insights Team
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Implementation Sciences International, Inc, Barnardos
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Tom McBride, The Behavioural Insights Team
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06099262
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2023056
- Status last verified
- Oct 2023
- First submitted
- 26 Sep 2023
- Last updated
- 25 Oct 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Oct 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- GenPMTO - Adaptation and Feasibility Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06099262
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2023056
- Conditions
- Violence, Emotional Adjustment, Parenting, Parent-Child Relations
- Keywords
- young people, youth violence, parenting programme
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- The Behavioural Insights TeamUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Implementation Sciences International, Inc, Barnardos
- Study start
- 11 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Mar 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 25 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This project is a multi-stage evaluation of GenPMTO (Generation Parent Management Training - Oregon Model). GenPMTO is a parenting programme which involves trained practitioners using active teaching approaches (such as group problem-solving, role-play, and video modelling) to support caregivers in using positive parenting strategies at home. The programme is designed to improve parenting practices, as well as a range of outcomes for young people, including improving academic performance, reducing school exclusions, and reducing offending and criminal behaviour. The version of the programme investigated in this project is delivered to groups of parents.
Detailed description
This project represents the first attempt to deliver and evaluate GenPMTO in the UK. To do so, the Ending Youth Violence Lab, at the Behavioural Insights Team, is conducting a multi-stage evaluation, involving delivering the intervention across three London boroughs, with a focus on caregivers of 8-14-year-old children and young people (CYPs), who are identified to have risk factors associated with involvement in violence.
To design this project, the Lab has collaborated with two partners. The first is ISII (Implementation Sciences International, Inc.), a research-based, non-profit organisation based in the USA, which implements the GenPMTO programme, in partnership with the programme developers. ISII also trains community practitioners in its use across the world. The second partner is Barnardo's, the UK's largest children's charity, and the delivery partner for the project.
This entry refers to the first 2 stages of the project, which will run concurrently:
Stage 1 - Adaptation and training
- The purpose of this Stage is to prepare for initial delivery and the feasibility testing of delivery, by making any adaptations that may be necessary for the UK context and beginning practitioner training.
- The research objectives of this Stage firstly focus on identifying whether the programme may require adaptations to fit into the UK context and identifying and justifying appropriate adaptations. Secondly, the investigators want to identify whether sufficient numbers of practitioners can be recruited and trained within the budget of the project, and to identify the optimal approach to recruitment and training of future practitioner cohorts to allow delivery at a larger scale.
Stage 2 - Feasibility study
The purpose of this Stage is to understand the feasibility of delivering GenPMTO to the caregivers of children who have been identified as being at risk of violence, through testing recruitment, retention, fidelity, etc. The investigators will also conduct further adaptation to the programme as necessary, responding to what we learn from practitioners and caregivers who have experienced the programme for the first time.
The specific research objectives here focus on:
- Feasibility - Can Barnardo's recruit and retain caregivers of children who meet inclusion criteria and are at risk of youth violence, and deliver the programme withfidelity?
- Acceptability - Is the GenPMTO programme seen as acceptable and valuable by caregivers and practitioners in a UK context?
- Evaluability - Firstly, is there sufficient demand and capacity to deliver GenPMTO at a scale required for a randomised control trial? Secondly, is it feasible to collect outcome data from participants, which would support robust outcome data collection procedures during a pilot and/or efficacy trial?
This will involve delivering the programme in 3 London boroughs, and collecting a range of survey data and conducting qualitative interviews with caregivers and with practitioners to explore the above questions. The investigators will collect pre- and post-programme outcome data using a range of self-report measures, to explore the potential for future robust evaluation (rather than to assess programme impact).
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 6
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Tower Hamlets 1 | – | Behavioral: GenPMTODelivering the GenPMTO programme to one group of caregivers within the Tower Hamlets borough. |
| Tower Hamlets 2 | – | Behavioral: GenPMTODelivering the GenPMTO programme to a second group of caregivers within the Tower Hamlets borough. |
| Brent 1 | – | Behavioral: GenPMTODelivering the GenPMTO programme to one group of caregivers within the Brent borough. |
| Brent 2 | – | Behavioral: GenPMTODelivering the GenPMTO programme to a second group of caregivers within the Brent borough. |
| Barking & Dagenham 1 | – | Behavioral: GenPMTODelivering the GenPMTO programme to one group of caregivers within the Barking \& Dagenham borough. |
| Barking & Dagenham 2 | – | Behavioral: GenPMTODelivering the GenPMTO programme to a second group of caregivers within the Barking \& Dagenham borough. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 8 to 14 years
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Child
- Study population
- Caregivers of young people aged 8-14, who have been identified as being at risk of committing violent acts and/or entering into the criminal justice system.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| GenPMTOGenPMTO is a parenting programme which involves trained practitioners using active teaching approaches (such as group problem-solving, role-play, and video modelling) to support caregivers in using positive parenting strategies at home. The programme is designed to improve parenting practices, as well as a range of outcomes for young people, including improving academic performance, reducing school exclusions, and reducing offending and criminal behaviour. The version of the programme investigated in this project is delivered to groups of parents. | Behavioural | Barking & Dagenham 1, Barking & Dagenham 2, Brent 1, Brent 2, Tower Hamlets 1, Tower Hamlets 2 |
Primary outcome
Proportion of practitioners recruited to deliver GenPMTO
Time frame: Prior to delivery of the intervention
This will involve calculating, as a percentage, the number of recruited practitioners, compared to the target.
Proportion of practitioners enrolled in training to deliver GenPMTO
Time frame: Throughout delivery of the intervention - approximately 5 months
This will involve calculating, as a percentage, the number of practitioners enrolled in training, compared to the target.
Number of referrals received for caregivers to receive GenPMTO
Time frame: Prior to delivery of the intervention
This will involve identifying the total count of referrals received during the feasibility study, as well the mean and standard deviation of monthly referral totals across the feasibility study.
Proportion of referred caregivers deemed eligible for GenPMTO
Time frame: Prior to delivery of the intervention
This will involve calculating, as a percentage, the number of caregivers deemed eligible for GenPMTO, compared to to the total number of referred caregivers.
Proportion of eligible caregivers who are offered GenPMTO who accept this offer (take-up of services)
Time frame: Prior to delivery of the intervention
This will involve calculating, as a percentage, the number of caregivers who consent to take part in the feasibility study, compared to to the total number of caregivers who are considered eligible to receive and are offered the programme.
Retention / drop-out rates of caregivers receiving GenPMTO
Time frame: Throughout delivery of the intervention - approximately 5 months
This will involve calculating, as a percentage, the number of caregivers who complete a program, compared to the total number of caregivers who consent to receiving GenPMTO
Retention / drop-out rates of practitioners delivering GenPMTO
Time frame: Throughout delivery of the intervention - approximately 5 months
This will involve calculating, as a percentage, the number of practitioners who have completed relevant training and are able to deliver GenPMTO, compared to the total number of practitioners who were enrolled in training.
Attendance rate at GenPMTO sessions
Time frame: Throughout delivery of the intervention - approximately 5 months
This will involve calculating, as a percentage, the number of caregivers who attended each GenPMTO session, compared to the number of caregivers who were expected (i.e. based on caregiver take-up/enrollment) to attend these sessions, as well the mean and standard deviation across the feasibility study.
Caregivers' perception of the quality of the content and delivery
Time frame: Within 1 month after the end of the intervention
This will involve calculating the mean and standard deviation of scores, based on a short feedback survey.
Programme dosage data
Time frame: Throughout delivery of the intervention - approximately 5 months
This will involve calculating the mean percentage of actual content delivered in GenPMTO sessions to a cohort of caregivers, compared to the amount of planned content to be delivered.
Ratings of practitioner fidelity
Time frame: Throughout delivery of the intervention - approximately 5 months
This will involve calculating the mean of practitioners' fidelity scores whilst delivering a full GenPMTO programme. Fidelity is measured using the Fidelity of Implementation (FIMP) Rating System system (expert assessment of videotaped sessions). Each session is assessed on a 9 point scale (1 referring to 'needs work', and 9 referring to 'good work').
Parenting approach
Time frame: Within 1 month after the end of the intervention
Parenting Practices Interview (self-reported measure) This is a 64 item measure, with responses measured on a 1-7 Likert scale. Total scores range from 64 to 448, with higher scores indicating improved parenting practices.
Parental self-efficacy
Time frame: Within 1 month after the end of the intervention
Parental Locus of Control-Short Form Revised (self-report) This is a 24 item measure, with responses measured on a 1-5 Likert scale. Total scores range from 24 to 120, with higher scores indicating greater parental self-efficacy.
Behavioural problems
Time frame: Within 1 month after the end of the intervention
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (parent report of child) The overall (five-subscale) SDQ score ranges from 0 to 50, with a higher score indicating abnormal behaviours. The Total Difficulties score ranges from 0 to 40. The externalising score ranges from 0 to 20 and is the sum of the conduct and hyperactivity scales. The internalising score ranges from 0 to 20 and is the sum of the emotional and peer problems scales. Higher scores indicate abnormal behaviours.
Behavioural problems
Time frame: Within 1 month after the end of the intervention
Eyberg Child Behaviour Inventory (parent report of child) 7-point Likert scale, from 1 ('Never Occurs') to 7 ('Always Occurs') and a Yes/No Problem scale. Individual Intensity Score items are summed up, with resultant scores ranging from 36 to 252. For each item, the parents' response regarding whether the behaviour is a problem for them ('Yes' = 1 , 'No' = 0) is also summed to create the Problem Score, ranging from 0 to 36.
Offending behaviour - Variety
Time frame: Within 1 month after the end of the intervention
Young people are asked to report on offending behaviours they have participated in. Variety of delinquency score: Sum the number of items the respondent answers 'yes' to: Yes = 1 No = 0 Produces a score that ranges from 0-19, where a higher score indicates a higher variety of delinquency.
Offending behaviour - Volume
Time frame: Within 1 month after the end of the intervention
Self-reported delinquency scale (child self-report measure) Young people are asked to report on offending behaviours they have participated in. Volume of delinquency score: Summing the point values when respondents report a number of times. Point values are assigned as follows: Once = 1 Twice = 2 3 times = 3 4 times = 4 5 times = 5 Between 6 and 10 times = 6 More than 10 times = 11 Produces a score that ranges from 0 to 11 for each delinquent behaviour, where a higher score indicates a higher volume of delinquency
Victimisation
Time frame: Within 1 month after the end of the intervention
Victimisation sub-scale of the Problem Behaviour Frequency Scale (child self-report measure) Produces a score ranging from 6-36 achieved by summing scores of the two subscales, where a higher score indicates a higher frequency of problem behaviours
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Oct 2023.
- Project description and study protocolLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Violence
Not yet recruiting
BEAR for Women Who Have Experienced Sexual Assault and Have Suicidal Thoughts
Sexual Assault and Rape, Suicidal Thoughts
Not yet recruiting
Group Cognitive Processing Therapy for Women Survivors of Gender-Based Violence: Feasibility Study
Trauma, Psychological, Traumatic Stress Disorder
Active, not recruiting
Recovery Legal Care Pilot
Firearm Injury, Economic Problems
Recruiting
Virtual Reality Intervention (VR-GINSO) for Reducing Aggression in Young Offenders
Aggression
RecruitingObservational study
Self-Dehumanization and Hesitation to Report Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Violence and Emotional Adjustment, run by The Behavioural Insights Team at 3 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Oct 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Elizabeth Brailsford (+44 7732 800589, elizabeth.brailsford@barnardos.org.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of practitioners recruited to deliver GenPMTO (time frame: Prior to delivery of the intervention). The study lists 18 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Oct 2023.