AzTrials
AzTrials

Atopic DermatitisPhase 2NCT06101823

Phase 2a Study of Efficacy and Safety of OpSCF in Moderate to Severe AD (Atopic Dermatitis)

A Phase 2 study testing OpSCF in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by Insmed Incorporated at 22 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of a monoclonal antibody, OpSCF, in the treatment of adults with moderate to severe Atopic Dermatitis (Eczema). OpSCF will be compared to a placebo. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Atopic Dermatitis
What is being tested?
OpSCF
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
50 participants
Where
22 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
21 Nov 2023to 18 Aug 2025
Phase
Phase 2

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subject has clinically confirmed diagnosis of active AD.
  • Subject has at least a 6-month history of AD
  • Subject is willing to use effective birth control

Who cannot join

  • Subject is a female who is breastfeeding, pregnant, or who is planning to become pregnant during the study.
  • Subject has any clinically significant medical condition that would put the subject at undue risk or interfere with interpretation of study results.
  • Subject has used dupilumab within 26 weeks prior to Day 1.
  • Subject has used tralokinumab within 12 weeks prior to Day 1.
  • NOTE: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.

Trial locations and contacts

22 sites in 2 countries.

22 sites in 2 countries

United States18 sites
  • Oakland Hills Dermatology P.C

    Auburn Hills, Michigan, 48326

  • Saginaw Bay Dermatology

    Bay City, Michigan, 48706

  • Dermatology Of Seattle

    Bellevue, Washington, 98004

  • Cahaba Dermatology & Skin Health Center

    Birmingham, Alabama, 33607

  • Skin Care Research

    Boca Raton, Florida, 33456

  • First OC Dermatology Research

    Fountain Valley, California, 92708

  • Rodgers Dermatology

    Frisco, Texas, 75034

  • Axon Clinical Research

    Inglewood, California, 90301

  • Forest Hills Dermatology Group

    Kew Gardens, New York, 11415

  • DS Research of Kentucky

    Louisville, Kentucky, 40241

  • Skin Research of South Florida

    Miami, Florida, 33173

  • RM Medical Research

    Miami Lakes, Florida, 33014

  • Skin Cancer and Dermatology Institute

    Reno, Nevada, 89509

  • Arlington Dermatology

    Rolling Meadows, Illinois, 60008

  • University Clinical Trials

    San Diego, California, 92123

  • Unison Clinical Trials

    Sherman Oaks, California, 91403

  • Advanced Clinical Research Institute

    Tampa, Florida, 33607

  • Options Research Group

    West Lafayette, Indiana, 47906

Other trials in United States

Canada4 sites
  • Innovaderm Research Inc

    Montreal, Quebec, H2X 2V1

  • Oshawa Clinic Dermatology Trials

    Oshawa, Ontario, L1H 1B9

  • Centre de Recherche Saint-Louis

    Québec, Quebec, G1W 4R4

  • Research Toronto

    Toronto, Ontario, M4W 2N2

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 2a Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of OpSCF in the Treatment of Adult Subjects With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of a monoclonal antibody, OpSCF, in the treatment of adults with moderate to severe Atopic Dermatitis (Eczema). OpSCF will be compared to a placebo. OpSCF or placebo will be administered every 2 weeks for 14 weeks, and the efficacy will be assessed two weeks later. After that, subjects may choose to enter an Open Label Extension phase in which all subjects will receive OpSCF every 4 weeks for 40 additional weeks.

Being tested
OpSCF, Placebo
Keywords
Eczema, Monoclonal Antibody
Medical subject headings
Dermatitis, Atopic, Eczema

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • OpSCFBiological

    Also called Humanized IgG4k, SCF248

    Administered SC.

  • PlaceboBiological

    Administered SC.

Study groups in NCT06101823
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
OpSCF 600 mgExperimentalParticipants received OpSCF 600 milligrams (mg), once every 2 weeks (Q2W), subcutaneously (SC), up to 14 weeks in the placebo-controlled period.
Receives: Biological: OpSCF
OpSCF Matching-PlaceboPlacebo comparatorParticipants received OpSCF matching-placebo, Q2W, SC, up to 14 weeks in the placebo-controlled period.
Receives: Biological: Placebo
OpSCF 600 mg/OpSCF 600mgExperimentalParticipants who received OpSCF 600 mg and completed placebo-controlled treatment received OpSCF 600mg, once every 4 weeks (Q4W), SC, up to 36 weeks in the open-label extension (OLE) period.
Receives: Biological: OpSCF; Biological: Placebo
OpSCF Matching-Placebo/OpSCF 600 mgPlacebo comparatorParticipants who received OpSCF matching-placebo and completed placebo-controlled treatment received OpSCF 600mg, Q4W, SC, up to 36 weeks in the OLE period.
Receives: Biological: OpSCF; Biological: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at Week 16

    The EASI quantifies the severity of a participant's AD based on both lesion severity and the % of body surface area (BSA) affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD lesions (erythema [E], induration/papulation[I], excoriation[Ex] \& lichenification[L]) was scored separately for each of 4 body regions[head(h), upper extremities(u), trunk(t), lower extremities(l)] on a 4-point scale:0= absent; 1= mild;2= moderate;3= severe. EASI area score was based on % BSA with AD in body region: 0(no involvement), 1(< 10%),2 (10 to <30%), 3(30 to <50%), 4(50 to <70%), 5(70 to <90%) and 6(90 to 100%). The EASI score is obtained as: EASI(A) = 0.1*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh)*Ah + 0.2*(Eu+Iu+Exu+Lu)*Au + 0.3*(Et +It+Ext+Lt)*At + 0.4*(El+Il+Exl+Ll)*Al. Total EASI score = 0.0 to 72.0; higher scores indicate greater severity of AD. Here, a negative change from baseline indicates less severity in AD.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

Secondary outcomes (18)
  1. Number of Participants Who Experienced At-Least One Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered a pharmaceutical product \& that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. It can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a study product, whether or not considered related to the study product. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose resulted in death, was life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity \& was a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Any AE starting on or after the first dose date will be considered TEAE.

    Measured: From first dose of study drug up to end of follow-up (up to Week 67)

  2. Percent Change From Baseline in EASI at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14

    The EASI quantifies the severity of a participant's AD based on both lesion severity and the % of body surface area (BSA) affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD lesions (erythema [E], induration/papulation[I], excoriation[Ex] \& lichenification[L]) was scored separately for each of 4 body regions[head(h), upper extremities(u), trunk(t), lower extremities(l)] on a 4-point scale:0= absent; 1= mild;2= moderate;3= severe. EASI area score was based on % BSA with AD in body region: 0(no involvement), 1(< 10%),2 (10 to <30%), 3(30 to <50%), 4(50 to <70%), 5(70 to <90%) and 6(90 to 100%). The EASI score is obtained as: EASI(A) = 0.1*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh)*Ah + 0.2*(Eu+Iu+Exu+Lu)*Au + 0.3*(Et +It+Ext+Lt)*At + 0.4*(El+Il+Exl+Ll)*Al. Total EASI score = 0.0 to 72.0; higher scores indicate greater severity of AD. Here, a negative change from baseline indicates less severity in AD.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 14

  3. Change From Baseline in EASI at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16

    The EASI quantifies the severity of a participant's AD based on both lesion severity and the % of body surface area (BSA) affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD lesions (erythema [E], induration/papulation[I], excoriation[Ex] \& lichenification[L]) was scored separately for each of 4 body regions[head(h), upper extremities(u), trunk(t), lower extremities(l)] on a 4-point scale:0= absent; 1= mild;2= moderate;3= severe. EASI area score was based on % BSA with AD in body region: 0(no involvement), 1(< 10%),2 (10 to <30%), 3(30 to <50%), 4(50 to <70%), 5(70 to <90%) and 6(90 to 100%). The EASI score is obtained as: EASI(A) = 0.1*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh)*Ah + 0.2*(Eu+Iu+Exu+Lu)*Au + 0.3*(Et +It+Ext+Lt)*At + 0.4*(El+Il+Exl+Ll)*Al. Total EASI score = 0.0 to 72.0; higher scores indicate greater severity of AD. Here, a negative change from baseline indicates less severity in AD.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16

  4. Percentage of Participants Achieving At-Least 50% Improvement From Baseline in EASI (EASI50)

    The EASI quantifies severity of a participant's AD based on both lesion severity \& % of body surface area (BSA) affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD lesions (erythema [E], induration/papulation[I], excoriation[Ex] \& lichenification[L]) was scored separately for each of 4 body regions[head(h), upper extremities(u), trunk(t), lower extremities(l)] on a 4-point scale:0=absent; 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe. EASI area score was based on % BSA with AD in body region: 0(no involvement), 1(< 10%),2 (10 to <30%), 3(30 to <50%), 4(50 to <70%), 5(70 to <90%) \& 6(90 to 100%). EASI score is obtained as: EASI(A) = 0.1*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh)*Ah + 0.2*(Eu+Iu+Exu+Lu)*Au + 0.3*(Et +It+Ext+Lt)*At + 0.4*(El+Il+Exl+Ll)*Al. Total EASI score = 0.0 to 72.0; higher scores indicate greater severity of AD. Here, a negative change from baseline indicates less severity in AD. EASI 50 response was defined as at least a 50% improvement in EASI relative to Baseline. 90% CI was based on exact Clopper-Pearson method.

    Measured: At Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16

  5. Percentage of Participants Achieving At-Least 75% Improvement From Baseline in EASI (EASI75)

    The EASI quantifies severity of a participant's AD based on both lesion severity \& % of body surface area (BSA) affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD lesions (erythema [E], induration/papulation[I], excoriation[Ex] \& lichenification[L]) was scored separately for each of 4 body regions[head(h), upper extremities(u), trunk(t), lower extremities(l)] on a 4-point scale:0=absent; 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe. EASI area score was based on % BSA with AD in body region: 0(no involvement), 1(< 10%),2 (10 to <30%), 3(30 to <50%), 4(50 to <70%), 5(70 to <90%) \& 6(90 to 100%). EASI score is obtained as: EASI(A) = 0.1*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh)*Ah + 0.2*(Eu+Iu+Exu+Lu)*Au + 0.3*(Et +It+Ext+Lt)*At + 0.4*(El+Il+Exl+Ll)*Al. Total EASI score = 0.0 to 72.0; higher scores indicate greater severity of AD. Here, a negative change from baseline indicates less severity in AD. EASI 75 response was defined as at least a 75% improvement in EASI relative to Baseline. 90% CI was based on exact Clopper-Pearson method.

    Measured: At Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16

  6. Percentage of Participants Achieving At-Least 90% Improvement From Baseline in EASI (EASI90)

    The EASI quantifies severity of a participant's AD based on both lesion severity \& % of body surface area (BSA) affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD lesions (erythema [E], induration/papulation[I], excoriation[Ex] \& lichenification[L]) was scored separately for each of 4 body regions[head(h), upper extremities(u), trunk(t), lower extremities(l)] on a 4-point scale:0=absent; 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe. EASI area score was based on % BSA with AD in body region: 0(no involvement), 1(< 10%),2 (10 to <30%), 3(30 to <50%), 4(50 to <70%), 5(70 to <90%) \& 6(90 to 100%). EASI score is obtained as: EASI(A) = 0.1*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh)*Ah + 0.2*(Eu+Iu+Exu+Lu)*Au + 0.3*(Et +It+Ext+Lt)*At + 0.4*(El+Il+Exl+Ll)*Al. Total EASI score = 0.0 to 72.0; higher scores indicate greater severity of AD. Here, a negative change from baseline indicates less severity in AD. EASI 90 response was defined as at least a 90% improvement in EASI relative to Baseline. 90% CI was based on exact Clopper-Pearson method.

    Measured: At Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16

  7. Percentage of Participants Achieving At-Least a 2-grade Reduction From Baseline to Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) in Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD)

    The vIGA-AD was assessed by the principal investigator or sub-investigator using the descriptors that best described the overall appearance of the lesions. It is a 5-point morphological assessment of overall disease severity that ranges from 0 to 4, where 0 = Clear; No inflammatory signs of atopic dermatitis 1 = Almost clear; Barely perceptible erythema, barely perceptible induration/papulation, and/or minimal lichenification 2 = Mild; Slight but definite erythema (pink), slight but definite induration/papulation, and/ or slight but definite lichenification 3 = Moderate; Clearly perceptible erythema (dull red), clearly perceptible induration/papulation, and/or clearly perceptible lichenification 4 = Severe; Marked erythema (deep or bright red), marked induration/ papulation, and/or marked lichenification. Percentage of participants who achieved at least a 2-grade reduction from baseline to clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) in vIGA-AD are reported here.

    Measured: At Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16

  8. Percentage of Participants Achieving At-Least a 2-grade Reduction From Baseline in vIGA-AD

    The vIGA-AD was assessed by the principal investigator or sub-investigator using the descriptors that best described the overall appearance of the lesions. It is a 5-point morphological assessment of overall disease severity that ranges from 0 to 4, where 0 = Clear; No inflammatory signs of atopic dermatitis 1 = Almost clear; Barely perceptible erythema, barely perceptible induration/papulation, and/or minimal lichenification 2 = Mild; Slight but definite erythema (pink), slight but definite induration/papulation, and/ or slight but definite lichenification 3 = Moderate; Clearly perceptible erythema (dull red), clearly perceptible induration/papulation, and/or clearly perceptible lichenification 4 = Severe; Marked erythema (deep or bright red), marked induration/ papulation, and/or marked lichenification. The percentage of participants with reduction from baseline of ≥2 grade in vIGA-AD score has been reported.

    Measured: At Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16

  9. Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of the Daily Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (PP-NRS)

    PP-NRS is based on the Numeric Rating Scale which was used to assess the level of itch the participant was experiencing. The following question was asked to participants: "On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 = "no itch" and 10 = "worst itch imaginable", how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours?" Based on the score provided by participant, the PP-NRS score was assigned. Higher score indicates more severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16

  10. Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of the Daily PP-NRS

    PP-NRS is based on the Numeric Rating Scale which was used to assess the level of itch the participant was experiencing. The following question was asked to participants: "On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 = "no itch" and 10 = "worst itch imaginable", how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours?" Based on the score provided by participant, the PP-NRS score was assigned. Higher score indicates more severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16

  11. Percentage of Participants Achieving At-Least a 4-point Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of the Daily PP-NRS

    PP-NRS is based on the Numeric Rating Scale which was used to assess the level of itch the participant was experiencing. The following question was be asked to participants: "On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 = "no itch" and 10 = "worst itch imaginable", how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours?" Based on the score provided by participant, the PP-NRS score was assigned. Higher score indicates more severity. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. The percentage of participants who had at least a 4-point reduction in the NRS score at post-baseline visits has been reported.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16

  12. Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) Involved With Atopic Dermatitis (AD)

    The overall BSA affected by AD was evaluated (from 0% to 100%). It was calculated using the palm surface area method. This method states that palmar surface of 1 hand (using the participant's hand and including the fingers) represents 1% of his or her total BSA.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16

  13. Percent Change From Baseline in BSA Involved With AD

    The overall BSA affected by AD was evaluated (from 0% to 100%). It was calculated using the palm surface area method. This method states that palmar surface of 1 hand (using the participant's hand and including the fingers) represents 1% of his or her total BSA.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16

  14. Change From Baseline in Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool (ADCT) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

    ADCT questionnaire is a self-assessment comprised of 6 concise questions to evaluate participant's perceptions of AD symptoms and impacts on their life and function over the last week. Each question carries equal weight and is scored from 0 to 4, for a total score ranging between 0 and 24. Higher score indicates higher severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8,12 and 16

  15. Change From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

    POEM is a self-assessment of disease severity using 7 questions asked to participant. A maximum value of 28 can be assigned based on the participant's response to 7 questions scored from 0 to 4, where 0 = No days, 1 = 1-2 days, 2 = 3-4 days, 3 = 5-6 days and 4 = Every day. Higher score indicates high severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8,12 and 16

  16. Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

    DLQI is a 10 questions questionnaire to measure how much skin problems have affected a participant's life over the last week. Each question is scored from 0 to 3 (0 = Not at all, 1 = A little, 2 = A lot and 3 = Very much). The DLQI is calculated by summing the score of each question, giving a total score ranging from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much). The higher the score the more quality of life is impaired. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in QoL.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8,12 and 16

  17. Placebo-controlled Period: Serum Concentrations of OpSCF Over Time

    Measured: Days 15, 29, 43, 57, 85, 99, 102, 106 and 113

  18. OLE Period: Serum Concentrations of OpSCF Over Time

    Measured: Days 141, 169, 197, 225, 253, 281, 309 and 337

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Oct 2023
  2. Study start21 Nov 2023
  3. Primary completion3 Sep 2024
  4. Study completion18 Aug 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
50 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06101823
Sponsor's protocol ID
OpSCF-201
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
19 Oct 2023
Last updated
11 Sep 2026
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in