Atopic DermatitisPhase 2NCT06101823
Phase 2a Study of Efficacy and Safety of OpSCF in Moderate to Severe AD (Atopic Dermatitis)
A Phase 2 study testing OpSCF in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by Insmed Incorporated at 22 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of a monoclonal antibody, OpSCF, in the treatment of adults with moderate to severe Atopic Dermatitis (Eczema). OpSCF will be compared to a placebo. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Atopic Dermatitis
- What is being tested?
- OpSCF
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 22 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 21 Nov 2023to 18 Aug 2025
- Phase
- Phase 2
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subject has clinically confirmed diagnosis of active AD.
- Subject has at least a 6-month history of AD
- Subject is willing to use effective birth control
Who cannot join
- Subject is a female who is breastfeeding, pregnant, or who is planning to become pregnant during the study.
- Subject has any clinically significant medical condition that would put the subject at undue risk or interfere with interpretation of study results.
- Subject has used dupilumab within 26 weeks prior to Day 1.
- Subject has used tralokinumab within 12 weeks prior to Day 1.
- NOTE: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.
Trial locations and contacts
22 sites in 2 countries.
22 sites in 2 countries
United States18 sites
Oakland Hills Dermatology P.C
Auburn Hills, Michigan, 48326
Saginaw Bay Dermatology
Bay City, Michigan, 48706
Dermatology Of Seattle
Bellevue, Washington, 98004
Cahaba Dermatology & Skin Health Center
Birmingham, Alabama, 33607
Skin Care Research
Boca Raton, Florida, 33456
First OC Dermatology Research
Fountain Valley, California, 92708
Rodgers Dermatology
Frisco, Texas, 75034
Axon Clinical Research
Inglewood, California, 90301
Forest Hills Dermatology Group
Kew Gardens, New York, 11415
DS Research of Kentucky
Louisville, Kentucky, 40241
Skin Research of South Florida
Miami, Florida, 33173
RM Medical Research
Miami Lakes, Florida, 33014
Skin Cancer and Dermatology Institute
Reno, Nevada, 89509
Arlington Dermatology
Rolling Meadows, Illinois, 60008
University Clinical Trials
San Diego, California, 92123
Unison Clinical Trials
Sherman Oaks, California, 91403
Advanced Clinical Research Institute
Tampa, Florida, 33607
Options Research Group
West Lafayette, Indiana, 47906
Canada4 sites
Innovaderm Research Inc
Montreal, Quebec, H2X 2V1
Oshawa Clinic Dermatology Trials
Oshawa, Ontario, L1H 1B9
Centre de Recherche Saint-Louis
Québec, Quebec, G1W 4R4
Research Toronto
Toronto, Ontario, M4W 2N2
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 2a Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of OpSCF in the Treatment of Adult Subjects With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis
The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of a monoclonal antibody, OpSCF, in the treatment of adults with moderate to severe Atopic Dermatitis (Eczema). OpSCF will be compared to a placebo. OpSCF or placebo will be administered every 2 weeks for 14 weeks, and the efficacy will be assessed two weeks later. After that, subjects may choose to enter an Open Label Extension phase in which all subjects will receive OpSCF every 4 weeks for 40 additional weeks.
- Conditions
- Atopic Dermatitis
- Being tested
- OpSCF, Placebo
- Keywords
- Eczema, Monoclonal Antibody
- Medical subject headings
- Dermatitis, Atopic, Eczema
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
OpSCFBiological
Also called Humanized IgG4k, SCF248
Administered SC.
PlaceboBiological
Administered SC.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| OpSCF 600 mg | Experimental | Participants received OpSCF 600 milligrams (mg), once every 2 weeks (Q2W), subcutaneously (SC), up to 14 weeks in the placebo-controlled period. Receives: Biological: OpSCF |
| OpSCF Matching-Placebo | Placebo comparator | Participants received OpSCF matching-placebo, Q2W, SC, up to 14 weeks in the placebo-controlled period. Receives: Biological: Placebo |
| OpSCF 600 mg/OpSCF 600mg | Experimental | Participants who received OpSCF 600 mg and completed placebo-controlled treatment received OpSCF 600mg, once every 4 weeks (Q4W), SC, up to 36 weeks in the open-label extension (OLE) period. Receives: Biological: OpSCF; Biological: Placebo |
| OpSCF Matching-Placebo/OpSCF 600 mg | Placebo comparator | Participants who received OpSCF matching-placebo and completed placebo-controlled treatment received OpSCF 600mg, Q4W, SC, up to 36 weeks in the OLE period. Receives: Biological: OpSCF; Biological: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at Week 16
The EASI quantifies the severity of a participant's AD based on both lesion severity and the % of body surface area (BSA) affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD lesions (erythema [E], induration/papulation[I], excoriation[Ex] \& lichenification[L]) was scored separately for each of 4 body regions[head(h), upper extremities(u), trunk(t), lower extremities(l)] on a 4-point scale:0= absent; 1= mild;2= moderate;3= severe. EASI area score was based on % BSA with AD in body region: 0(no involvement), 1(< 10%),2 (10 to <30%), 3(30 to <50%), 4(50 to <70%), 5(70 to <90%) and 6(90 to 100%). The EASI score is obtained as: EASI(A) = 0.1*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh)*Ah + 0.2*(Eu+Iu+Exu+Lu)*Au + 0.3*(Et +It+Ext+Lt)*At + 0.4*(El+Il+Exl+Ll)*Al. Total EASI score = 0.0 to 72.0; higher scores indicate greater severity of AD. Here, a negative change from baseline indicates less severity in AD.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Secondary outcomes (18)
Number of Participants Who Experienced At-Least One Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered a pharmaceutical product \& that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. It can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a study product, whether or not considered related to the study product. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose resulted in death, was life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity \& was a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Any AE starting on or after the first dose date will be considered TEAE.
Measured: From first dose of study drug up to end of follow-up (up to Week 67)
Percent Change From Baseline in EASI at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14
The EASI quantifies the severity of a participant's AD based on both lesion severity and the % of body surface area (BSA) affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD lesions (erythema [E], induration/papulation[I], excoriation[Ex] \& lichenification[L]) was scored separately for each of 4 body regions[head(h), upper extremities(u), trunk(t), lower extremities(l)] on a 4-point scale:0= absent; 1= mild;2= moderate;3= severe. EASI area score was based on % BSA with AD in body region: 0(no involvement), 1(< 10%),2 (10 to <30%), 3(30 to <50%), 4(50 to <70%), 5(70 to <90%) and 6(90 to 100%). The EASI score is obtained as: EASI(A) = 0.1*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh)*Ah + 0.2*(Eu+Iu+Exu+Lu)*Au + 0.3*(Et +It+Ext+Lt)*At + 0.4*(El+Il+Exl+Ll)*Al. Total EASI score = 0.0 to 72.0; higher scores indicate greater severity of AD. Here, a negative change from baseline indicates less severity in AD.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 14
Change From Baseline in EASI at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16
The EASI quantifies the severity of a participant's AD based on both lesion severity and the % of body surface area (BSA) affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD lesions (erythema [E], induration/papulation[I], excoriation[Ex] \& lichenification[L]) was scored separately for each of 4 body regions[head(h), upper extremities(u), trunk(t), lower extremities(l)] on a 4-point scale:0= absent; 1= mild;2= moderate;3= severe. EASI area score was based on % BSA with AD in body region: 0(no involvement), 1(< 10%),2 (10 to <30%), 3(30 to <50%), 4(50 to <70%), 5(70 to <90%) and 6(90 to 100%). The EASI score is obtained as: EASI(A) = 0.1*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh)*Ah + 0.2*(Eu+Iu+Exu+Lu)*Au + 0.3*(Et +It+Ext+Lt)*At + 0.4*(El+Il+Exl+Ll)*Al. Total EASI score = 0.0 to 72.0; higher scores indicate greater severity of AD. Here, a negative change from baseline indicates less severity in AD.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving At-Least 50% Improvement From Baseline in EASI (EASI50)
The EASI quantifies severity of a participant's AD based on both lesion severity \& % of body surface area (BSA) affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD lesions (erythema [E], induration/papulation[I], excoriation[Ex] \& lichenification[L]) was scored separately for each of 4 body regions[head(h), upper extremities(u), trunk(t), lower extremities(l)] on a 4-point scale:0=absent; 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe. EASI area score was based on % BSA with AD in body region: 0(no involvement), 1(< 10%),2 (10 to <30%), 3(30 to <50%), 4(50 to <70%), 5(70 to <90%) \& 6(90 to 100%). EASI score is obtained as: EASI(A) = 0.1*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh)*Ah + 0.2*(Eu+Iu+Exu+Lu)*Au + 0.3*(Et +It+Ext+Lt)*At + 0.4*(El+Il+Exl+Ll)*Al. Total EASI score = 0.0 to 72.0; higher scores indicate greater severity of AD. Here, a negative change from baseline indicates less severity in AD. EASI 50 response was defined as at least a 50% improvement in EASI relative to Baseline. 90% CI was based on exact Clopper-Pearson method.
Measured: At Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving At-Least 75% Improvement From Baseline in EASI (EASI75)
The EASI quantifies severity of a participant's AD based on both lesion severity \& % of body surface area (BSA) affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD lesions (erythema [E], induration/papulation[I], excoriation[Ex] \& lichenification[L]) was scored separately for each of 4 body regions[head(h), upper extremities(u), trunk(t), lower extremities(l)] on a 4-point scale:0=absent; 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe. EASI area score was based on % BSA with AD in body region: 0(no involvement), 1(< 10%),2 (10 to <30%), 3(30 to <50%), 4(50 to <70%), 5(70 to <90%) \& 6(90 to 100%). EASI score is obtained as: EASI(A) = 0.1*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh)*Ah + 0.2*(Eu+Iu+Exu+Lu)*Au + 0.3*(Et +It+Ext+Lt)*At + 0.4*(El+Il+Exl+Ll)*Al. Total EASI score = 0.0 to 72.0; higher scores indicate greater severity of AD. Here, a negative change from baseline indicates less severity in AD. EASI 75 response was defined as at least a 75% improvement in EASI relative to Baseline. 90% CI was based on exact Clopper-Pearson method.
Measured: At Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving At-Least 90% Improvement From Baseline in EASI (EASI90)
The EASI quantifies severity of a participant's AD based on both lesion severity \& % of body surface area (BSA) affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD lesions (erythema [E], induration/papulation[I], excoriation[Ex] \& lichenification[L]) was scored separately for each of 4 body regions[head(h), upper extremities(u), trunk(t), lower extremities(l)] on a 4-point scale:0=absent; 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe. EASI area score was based on % BSA with AD in body region: 0(no involvement), 1(< 10%),2 (10 to <30%), 3(30 to <50%), 4(50 to <70%), 5(70 to <90%) \& 6(90 to 100%). EASI score is obtained as: EASI(A) = 0.1*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh)*Ah + 0.2*(Eu+Iu+Exu+Lu)*Au + 0.3*(Et +It+Ext+Lt)*At + 0.4*(El+Il+Exl+Ll)*Al. Total EASI score = 0.0 to 72.0; higher scores indicate greater severity of AD. Here, a negative change from baseline indicates less severity in AD. EASI 90 response was defined as at least a 90% improvement in EASI relative to Baseline. 90% CI was based on exact Clopper-Pearson method.
Measured: At Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving At-Least a 2-grade Reduction From Baseline to Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) in Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD)
The vIGA-AD was assessed by the principal investigator or sub-investigator using the descriptors that best described the overall appearance of the lesions. It is a 5-point morphological assessment of overall disease severity that ranges from 0 to 4, where 0 = Clear; No inflammatory signs of atopic dermatitis 1 = Almost clear; Barely perceptible erythema, barely perceptible induration/papulation, and/or minimal lichenification 2 = Mild; Slight but definite erythema (pink), slight but definite induration/papulation, and/ or slight but definite lichenification 3 = Moderate; Clearly perceptible erythema (dull red), clearly perceptible induration/papulation, and/or clearly perceptible lichenification 4 = Severe; Marked erythema (deep or bright red), marked induration/ papulation, and/or marked lichenification. Percentage of participants who achieved at least a 2-grade reduction from baseline to clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) in vIGA-AD are reported here.
Measured: At Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving At-Least a 2-grade Reduction From Baseline in vIGA-AD
The vIGA-AD was assessed by the principal investigator or sub-investigator using the descriptors that best described the overall appearance of the lesions. It is a 5-point morphological assessment of overall disease severity that ranges from 0 to 4, where 0 = Clear; No inflammatory signs of atopic dermatitis 1 = Almost clear; Barely perceptible erythema, barely perceptible induration/papulation, and/or minimal lichenification 2 = Mild; Slight but definite erythema (pink), slight but definite induration/papulation, and/ or slight but definite lichenification 3 = Moderate; Clearly perceptible erythema (dull red), clearly perceptible induration/papulation, and/or clearly perceptible lichenification 4 = Severe; Marked erythema (deep or bright red), marked induration/ papulation, and/or marked lichenification. The percentage of participants with reduction from baseline of ≥2 grade in vIGA-AD score has been reported.
Measured: At Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of the Daily Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (PP-NRS)
PP-NRS is based on the Numeric Rating Scale which was used to assess the level of itch the participant was experiencing. The following question was asked to participants: "On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 = "no itch" and 10 = "worst itch imaginable", how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours?" Based on the score provided by participant, the PP-NRS score was assigned. Higher score indicates more severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of the Daily PP-NRS
PP-NRS is based on the Numeric Rating Scale which was used to assess the level of itch the participant was experiencing. The following question was asked to participants: "On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 = "no itch" and 10 = "worst itch imaginable", how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours?" Based on the score provided by participant, the PP-NRS score was assigned. Higher score indicates more severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving At-Least a 4-point Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of the Daily PP-NRS
PP-NRS is based on the Numeric Rating Scale which was used to assess the level of itch the participant was experiencing. The following question was be asked to participants: "On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 = "no itch" and 10 = "worst itch imaginable", how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours?" Based on the score provided by participant, the PP-NRS score was assigned. Higher score indicates more severity. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. The percentage of participants who had at least a 4-point reduction in the NRS score at post-baseline visits has been reported.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16
Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) Involved With Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
The overall BSA affected by AD was evaluated (from 0% to 100%). It was calculated using the palm surface area method. This method states that palmar surface of 1 hand (using the participant's hand and including the fingers) represents 1% of his or her total BSA.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16
Percent Change From Baseline in BSA Involved With AD
The overall BSA affected by AD was evaluated (from 0% to 100%). It was calculated using the palm surface area method. This method states that palmar surface of 1 hand (using the participant's hand and including the fingers) represents 1% of his or her total BSA.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16
Change From Baseline in Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool (ADCT) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
ADCT questionnaire is a self-assessment comprised of 6 concise questions to evaluate participant's perceptions of AD symptoms and impacts on their life and function over the last week. Each question carries equal weight and is scored from 0 to 4, for a total score ranging between 0 and 24. Higher score indicates higher severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8,12 and 16
Change From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
POEM is a self-assessment of disease severity using 7 questions asked to participant. A maximum value of 28 can be assigned based on the participant's response to 7 questions scored from 0 to 4, where 0 = No days, 1 = 1-2 days, 2 = 3-4 days, 3 = 5-6 days and 4 = Every day. Higher score indicates high severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8,12 and 16
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
DLQI is a 10 questions questionnaire to measure how much skin problems have affected a participant's life over the last week. Each question is scored from 0 to 3 (0 = Not at all, 1 = A little, 2 = A lot and 3 = Very much). The DLQI is calculated by summing the score of each question, giving a total score ranging from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much). The higher the score the more quality of life is impaired. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in QoL.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8,12 and 16
Placebo-controlled Period: Serum Concentrations of OpSCF Over Time
Measured: Days 15, 29, 43, 57, 85, 99, 102, 106 and 113
OLE Period: Serum Concentrations of OpSCF Over Time
Measured: Days 141, 169, 197, 225, 253, 281, 309 and 337
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Oct 2023
- Study start21 Nov 2023
- Primary completion3 Sep 2024
- Study completion18 Aug 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Atopic DermatitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Insmed Incorporated
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Study Director, Study director, Insmed Incorporated
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06101823
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- OpSCF-201
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 19 Oct 2023
- Last updated
- 11 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No