AzTrials
AzTrials

Ischemic Heart DiseaseTRACTIONNCT06101862

Coronary Computed Tomography Versus Invasive Angiography for Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome

A study testing CCTA, Conventional ICA and Team-based interventional triage in people with Ischemic Heart Disease and Non STEMI, run by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet at 6 sites in Denmark.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is a widely accepted initial diagnostic test for individuals suspected of having chronic coronary syndromes. However, there is limited evidence supporting its use in the acute setting. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
What is being tested?
CCTA, Conventional ICA and Team-based interventional triage
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
2,300 participants
Where
6 sitesDenmark
Study dates
1 Oct 2023to 1 Oct 2036
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Admitted with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction or unstable angina pectoris and an indication for subacute ICA
  • Elevated troponin or ischemic electrocardiographic changes
  • Written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Instability requiring acute or emergent ICA
  • History of percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting
  • Estimated glomerular filtration rate \< 30 mL/min/1.73m2
  • Probable type 2 acute myocardial infarction
  • Severe valvular heart disease as primary diagnosis or potential need for valve intervention
  • History of spontaneous coronary artery dissection
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Expected poor quality of the CCTA
  • Prior CCTA or ICA during index admission or within 1 week
  • Known allergy to beta-blockers or contrast agent
  • Pregnant or nursing
  • Previously randomized in this trial

Trial locations and contacts

6 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Niels Thue Olsen, PhD contact

+45 38 68 38 68

niels.thue.olsen@regionh.dk

6 sites in 1 country

Denmark6 sites, 6 recruiting
  • Bispebjerg Hospital

    Bispebjerg

    Gorm Mørk, 38 63 61 74 ext. 45, fh-dv@regionh.dk

    Recruiting
  • Herlev and Gentofte Hospital

    Copenhagen, Hellerup, 2900

    Kristian Eskesen, 38 67 38 67 ext. 45, niels.thue.olsen@regionh.dk

    Recruiting
  • Rigshospitalet

    Copenhagen

    Niels Thue Olsen, 38 63 38 63 ext. 45, rigshospital.rigshospitalet@regionh.dk

    Recruiting
  • Zealand University Hospital

    Copenhagen

    Henning Kofoed, 46 32 32 00 ext. 45, suh@regionsjaelland.dk

    Recruiting
  • North Zealand Hospital

    Hillerød

    Charlotte Kragelund, 48 29 50 00 ext. 45, noh.nordsjaellands-hospital@regionh.dk

    Recruiting
  • Hvidovre Hospital

    Hvidovre

    Jens Hove, 38 62 38 62 ext. 45, jens.dahlgaard.hove@regionh.dk

    Recruiting

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Official title: Team-based Interventional Triage in Acute Coronary Syndrome Based on Non-Invasive Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography - a Randomized Trial

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is a widely accepted initial diagnostic test for individuals suspected of having chronic coronary syndromes. However, there is limited evidence supporting its use in the acute setting. So far, no large-scale randomized trial has examined the performance of CCTA as an alternative to invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in individuals with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEACS).

If CCTA were to replace ICA as a routine procedure for individuals with NSTEACS, it could reduce the risk of complications related to ICA, improve patient comfort, expedite decision-making, and reduce healthcare expenses and interhospital transfers.

Being tested
CCTA, Conventional ICA, Team-based interventional triage
Keywords
Angiography, Computed Tomography, Coronary, Non-STEACS, CCTA, ICA, Randomized, Interventional Triage, TRACTION, Diagnostic imaging, Interventional cardiology, VERDICT, CT, Coronary Angiography, Complications, Coronary CT-team, Ischemic heart disease, Acute myocardial infarction, Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), Unstable angina pectoris
Medical subject headings
Myocardial Ischemia, Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction, Angina, Unstable, Coronary Disease, Myocardial Infarction, Coronary Stenosis, Coronary Artery Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CCTAProcedure or surgery

    Participants will be examined with CCTA during admission.

  • Conventional ICAProcedure or surgery

    Patients will be examined with conventional standard-of-care ICA.

  • Team-based interventional triageOther

    The CCTA will be discussed at a coronary CT-team conference to establish the treatment strategy and provide guidance for any necessary interventional procedure.

Study groups in NCT06101862
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Coronary computed tomography angiography + team-based interventional triageActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: CCTA; Other: Team-based interventional triage
Conventional invasive coronary angiographyOtherNot described
Receives: Procedure: Conventional ICA

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of participants with a combined endpoint of major adverse cardiac events

    All-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, hospitalization with refractory angina, or hospitalization with heart failure.

    Measured: At 1 year.

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Number of participants with a the individual composites of the primary outcome

    All-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, hospitalization with refractory angina, or hospitalization with heart failure.

    Measured: At 1 year.

  2. Number of participants with cardiovascular death

    Measured: At 1 year.

  3. Number of participants with unplanned coronary revascularization

    Measured: At 1 year.

  4. Health-related Quality of life

    Measured by EQ-5D-5L

    Measured: At 1 year.

  5. Angina symptom burden

    Measured by Seattle Angina Questionnaire

    Measured: At 1 year.

  6. Total (cumulative) radiation dosage during index admission

    Measured: At 1st hospital discharge, an average of 2 days.

  7. Length of index hospitalization

    Measured: At 1st hospital discharge, an average of 2 days.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Oct 2023
  2. Study start1 Oct 2023
  3. Primary completion1 Oct 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Oct 2036 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
2,300 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06101862
Sponsor's protocol ID
H-23024848
Acronym
TRACTION
Status last verified
Feb 2025
First submitted
28 Sep 2023
Last updated
19 Feb 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Data will be shared upon reasonable request and uploaded to a repository after the trial has been concluded.

Publications

  • Sorgaard MH, Kristensen AT, Eskesen K, Kofoed KF, Linde JJ, Kelbaek H, Ottesen M, Neland K, Kragelund C, Bertelsen MLN, Hove JD, Mork G, Kristiansen OP, Engstrom T, Lonborg JT, Kuhl JT, Risom SS, Blanche P, Olsen NT. Coronary computed tomography angiography versus invasive coronary angiography for interventional triage in acute coronary syndrome: Design of the randomized TRACTION trial. Am Heart J. 2026 Apr;294:107325. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2025.107325. Epub 2025 Dec 6.

    PubMed 41360328

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing CCTA, Conventional ICA and Team-based interventional triage in people with Ischemic Heart Disease and Non STEMI, run by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet at 6 sites in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 6 sites in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Niels Thue Olsen, PhD (+45 38 68 38 68, niels.thue.olsen@regionh.dk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of participants with a combined endpoint of major adverse cardiac events (time frame: At 1 year.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06101862, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Feb 2025.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
TRACTION Clinical Trial NCT06101862 | AzTrials