Placenta AccretaNCT06105034
Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorder Conservative Managment Versus Hysterectomy Prospective Analysis
An observational study of Placenta Accreta, run by Nourhan Elsadany at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to identify risk factors associated with performing cesarean hysterectomy versus conservative management in patients with placenta accreta spectrum (PAS). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 40 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Placenta Accreta
- What is being tested?
- interventional techniques, the severity of placental invasion, and various placental positions and suture techniques
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 300 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2022to 1 Sep 2023
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 40 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Study population: The aim of this study is to identify risk factors associated with performing cesarean hysterectomy versus conservative management in patients with placenta accreta spectrum (PAS).
Who may be able to join
- Pregnant women with history of previous cesarean section.
- Age above 18 years.
- Gestational age above 28 weeks.
- Confirmed diagnosis of Placenta previa accreta spectrum disorder by U/S or MRI if needed.
- U/S signs suggestive of placenta previa accrete (Green-top Guideline).
Who cannot join
- Gestational age less than 28 weeks.
- Age less than 18years
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The aim of this study is to identify risk factors associated with performing cesarean hysterectomy versus conservative management in patients with placenta accreta spectrum (PAS).
Research question What are the risk factors associated with cesarean hysterectomy in patients with placenta accreta spectrum? Research hypothesis There are certain risk factors associated with cesarean hysterectomy in patients with Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS).
Read the detailed description
Placenta accreta spectrum disorder (PAS) is a serious obstetric disorder that is characterized by low lying and deep penetration of the villi which are abnormally attached to the myometrium of the uterus. This obstructs its complete separation during the third stage of labor which induces continued bleeding, and have potentially life- threatening for the mother. Most commonly, it is a consequence of a partial or complete absence of the compact and spongy layer known as the decidua basalis, and mis-development of the fibrinoid Nitabuch's layer which lies between the boundary zone of the thick endometrium and the cytotrophoblastic shell in the placenta.
Traditionally, caesarean hysterectomy at the time of delivery has been the preferred management strategy for placenta previa accreta. Not only does this approach preclude future fertility, but it is also a procedure synonymous with significant perioperative risks. For women who wish to conserve their reproductive function, other treatment options have been described.
1.INTRODUCTION/ REVIEW Placenta accreta is defined as "the abnormal localization and adherence of the placenta villi to the uterine myometrium. Patients at risk for abnormal placentation should be assessed antenally by ultrasonography, with or without adjunct magnetic resonance imaging if indicated . Various grading systems of villous invasion during placenta implantation are integrated to a spectrum (PAS), including placenta accreta (the villi invade superficially into the myometrium), increta (the villi invade deeper into the myometrium but do not reach the serosa), and percreta (the villi invade into the uterine serosa or adjacent organs) Clinically, severe complications of PA include severe obstetric hemorrhage leading to disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC), iatrogenic injury to the ureters, bladder, bowel, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), acute transfusion reactions, electrolyte imbalance, and renal failure. In women with PA, the expected blood loss at delivery is 3000- 5000 mL, About 90% of patients require a blood transfusion with 40% requiring more than ten units of packed cell transfusion .
The most difficult problem to deal with is controlling hemorrhage during delivery caused by PAS disorders. The potential for bleeding correlates with the degree to which the placenta invades the myometrium, the area of abnormal adherence involved, and the presence or absence of invasion into extrauterine tissues such as the bladder or parametrial tissues .
Different methods have been employed to manage the PA, ranging from uterine conservation, which involves leaving the placenta in situ, to conventional hysterectomy. Classical cesarean sections (C- sections) prevent the excessive bleeding by leaving the adherent placenta in situ and by adopting strategic planning with a comprehensive analysis that aids the reduction in maternal morbidity and mortality rates .
Perinatal emergency hysterectomy is routinely used to avoid maternal morbidity and mortality . Given the fact that cesarean section history and placenta previa are major risk factors, the incidence of PAS disorders increases with the increasing rate of cesarean section .
Other risk factors include spontaneous or induced abortion, repeated miscarriages, in vitro fertilization embryo transfer, advanced maternal age, history of endometrial ablation, and previous uterine surgery .
Conservative and non-conservative management for PAS disorders have been compared. Cesarean hysterectomy is regarded as the safest and most practical, thereby remaining the management option of choice. Nevertheless, hysterectomy is associated with high rates of severe maternal morbidity. In cases of placenta percreta, especially with bladder invasion, owing to damage to pelvic organs and vasculature during hysterectomy .In recent years, with the application of an abdominal artery balloon and the improvement of surgical techniques, efforts are made to preserve the uterus for patients PAS. This is not only the improvement for fertility preservation, but also for better control of bleeding to reduce maternal morbidity.
The evidence on conservative management is considered low-quality, less reproducible, and operator-dependent. Critics noted the lack of histopathological confirmation or detailed differential diagnosis. Confounding factors in these studies needs to be controlled including the application of interventional techniques, the severity of placental invasion, and various placental positions and suture techniques .
Therefore, investigators will undertake a prospective study to analyze maternal and neonatal outcomes comparing women with PAS disorders treated with cesarean hysterectomy or conservatively.
- Conditions
- Placenta Accreta
- Being tested
- interventional techniques, the severity of placental invasion, and various placental positions and suture techniques
- Keywords
- placenta accreta spectrum managment
- Medical subject headings
- Placenta Accreta
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
interventional techniques, the severity of placental invasion, and various placental positions and suture techniquesProcedure or surgery
Clinically, severe complications of PA include severe obstetric hemorrhage leading to disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC), iatrogenic injury to the ureters, bladder, bowel, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), acute transfusion reactions, electrolyte imbalance, and renal failure. In women with PA, the expected blood loss at delivery is 3000- 5000 mL, About 90% of patients require a blood transfusion with 40% requiring more than ten units of packed cell transfusion
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Conservative management | 150 patients Receives: Procedure: interventional techniques, the severity of placental invasion, and various placental positions and suture techniques | |
| CS hysterectomy | 150 patients Receives: Procedure: interventional techniques, the severity of placental invasion, and various placental positions and suture techniques |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of the patient who diagnosed intraoperative with placenta accreta spectrum disorder and undergoing conservative management or hysterectomy
The diagnoses will be made based on intra-operative findings and/or pathologic features depending on the degree of placenta invasion (invading the myometrium or invading up to or beyond the uterine serosa). Patients with placenta accreta with complete peri-operative information will be included for further analysis.
Measured: from time of operation to diagnoses 1week
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Oct 2023
- Study start1 Mar 2022
- Primary completion1 Sep 2023
- Study completion1 Sep 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (17)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Placenta AccretaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Nourhan Elsadany
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Nourhan Elsadany, Ain Shams University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06105034
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MS 714/2021
- Status last verified
- Nov 2023
- First submitted
- 11 May 2022
- Last updated
- 7 Nov 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Zeng C, Yang M, Ding Y, Duan S, Zhou Y. Placenta accreta spectrum disorder trends in the context of the universal two-child policy in China and the risk of hysterectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Mar;140(3):312-318. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12418. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
PubMed 29214633Yan J, Shi CY, Yu L, Yang HX. Folding Sutures Following Tourniquet Binding as a Conservative Surgical Approach for Placenta Previa Combined with Morbidly Adherent Placenta. Chin Med J (Engl). 2015 Oct 20;128(20):2818-20. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.167365. No abstract available.
PubMed 26481753Wang Q, Ma J, Zhang H, Dou R, Huang B, Wang X, Zhao X, Chen D, Ding Y, Ding H, Cui S, Zhang W, Xin H, Gu W, Hu Y, Ding G, Qi H, Fan L, Ma Y, Lu J, Yang Y, Lin L, Luo X, Zhang X, Fan S, Yang H. Conservative management versus cesarean hysterectomy in patients with placenta increta or percreta. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 May;35(10):1944-1950. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1774871. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
PubMed 32498575Thurn L, Lindqvist PG, Jakobsson M, Colmorn LB, Klungsoyr K, Bjarnadottir RI, Tapper AM, Bordahl PE, Gottvall K, Petersen KB, Krebs L, Gissler M, Langhoff-Roos J, Kallen K. Abnormally invasive placenta-prevalence, risk factors and antenatal suspicion: results from a large population-based pregnancy cohort study in the Nordic countries. BJOG. 2016 Jul;123(8):1348-55. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13547. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
PubMed 26227006Silver RM, Fox KA, Barton JR, Abuhamad AZ, Simhan H, Huls CK, Belfort MA, Wright JD. Center of excellence for placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 May;212(5):561-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.11.018. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
PubMed 25460838Silver RM. Abnormal Placentation: Placenta Previa, Vasa Previa, and Placenta Accreta. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep;126(3):654-668. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001005.
PubMed 26244528Sentilhes L, Kayem G, Chandraharan E, Palacios-Jaraquemada J, Jauniaux E; FIGO Placenta Accreta Diagnosis and Management Expert Consensus Panel. FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum disorders: Conservative management. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Mar;140(3):291-298. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12410. No abstract available.
PubMed 29405320Sentilhes L, Goffinet F, Kayem G. Management of placenta accreta. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013 Oct;92(10):1125-34. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12222.
PubMed 23869630Sentilhes L, Ambroselli C, Kayem G, Provansal M, Fernandez H, Perrotin F, Winer N, Pierre F, Benachi A, Dreyfus M, Bauville E, Mahieu-Caputo D, Marpeau L, Descamps P, Goffinet F, Bretelle F. Maternal outcome after conservative treatment of placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Mar;115(3):526-534. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181d066d4.
PubMed 20177283Liu HY, Lin XG, Wu JL, Qiao FY, Deng DR, Zeng WJ. [Multiposition spiral suture of the lower uterine segment: a new technique to control the intraoperative bleeding of pernicious placenta previa]. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Oct 25;51(10):754-758. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2016.10.009. Chinese.
PubMed 27788743Licon E, Matsuzaki S, Opara KN, Machida H, Roman LD, Sasso EB, Matsuo K. Treatment and outcome of placenta percreta: Primary cesarean hysterectomy versus conservative management. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Jan;244:201-203. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.09.017. Epub 2019 Sep 20. No abstract available.
PubMed 31627939Latif Khan Y, Rahim A, Gardezi J, Iqbal M, Hassan Z, Altaf S, Bhatti S. Conventional and conservative management of placenta accreta is two ends of a single continuum: A report of three cases and literature review. Clin Case Rep. 2018 Jul 13;6(9):1739-1746. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.1717. eCollection 2018 Sep.
PubMed 30214754Jauniaux E, Alfirevic Z, Bhide AG, Belfort MA, Burton GJ, Collins SL, Dornan S, Jurkovic D, Kayem G, Kingdom J, Silver R, Sentilhes L; Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Placenta Praevia and Placenta Accreta: Diagnosis and Management: Green-top Guideline No. 27a. BJOG. 2019 Jan;126(1):e1-e48. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15306. Epub 2018 Sep 27. No abstract available.
PubMed 30260097Hunt JC. Conservative management of placenta accreta in a multiparous woman. J Pregnancy. 2010;2010:329618. doi: 10.1155/2010/329618. Epub 2010 Sep 30.
PubMed 21490740Society of Gynecologic Oncology; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine; Cahill AG, Beigi R, Heine RP, Silver RM, Wax JR. Placenta Accreta Spectrum. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec;219(6):B2-B16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.042.
PubMed 30471891
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Nov 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorder Conservative Managment Versus Hysterectomy Prospective Analysis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06105034
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MS 714/2021
- Conditions
- Placenta Accreta
- Keywords
- placenta accreta spectrum managment
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Nourhan ElsadanyUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Sep 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to identify risk factors associated with performing cesarean hysterectomy versus conservative management in patients with placenta accreta spectrum (PAS).
Research question What are the risk factors associated with cesarean hysterectomy in patients with placenta accreta spectrum? Research hypothesis There are certain risk factors associated with cesarean hysterectomy in patients with Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS).
Detailed description
Placenta accreta spectrum disorder (PAS) is a serious obstetric disorder that is characterized by low lying and deep penetration of the villi which are abnormally attached to the myometrium of the uterus. This obstructs its complete separation during the third stage of labor which induces continued bleeding, and have potentially life- threatening for the mother. Most commonly, it is a consequence of a partial or complete absence of the compact and spongy layer known as the decidua basalis, and mis-development of the fibrinoid Nitabuch's layer which lies between the boundary zone of the thick endometrium and the cytotrophoblastic shell in the placenta.
Traditionally, caesarean hysterectomy at the time of delivery has been the preferred management strategy for placenta previa accreta. Not only does this approach preclude future fertility, but it is also a procedure synonymous with significant perioperative risks. For women who wish to conserve their reproductive function, other treatment options have been described.
1.INTRODUCTION/ REVIEW Placenta accreta is defined as "the abnormal localization and adherence of the placenta villi to the uterine myometrium. Patients at risk for abnormal placentation should be assessed antenally by ultrasonography, with or without adjunct magnetic resonance imaging if indicated . Various grading systems of villous invasion during placenta implantation are integrated to a spectrum (PAS), including placenta accreta (the villi invade superficially into the myometrium), increta (the villi invade deeper into the myometrium but do not reach the serosa), and percreta (the villi invade into the uterine serosa or adjacent organs) Clinically, severe complications of PA include severe obstetric hemorrhage leading to disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC), iatrogenic injury to the ureters, bladder, bowel, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), acute transfusion reactions, electrolyte imbalance, and renal failure. In women with PA, the expected blood loss at delivery is 3000- 5000 mL, About 90% of patients require a blood transfusion with 40% requiring more than ten units of packed cell transfusion .
The most difficult problem to deal with is controlling hemorrhage during delivery caused by PAS disorders. The potential for bleeding correlates with the degree to which the placenta invades the myometrium, the area of abnormal adherence involved, and the presence or absence of invasion into extrauterine tissues such as the bladder or parametrial tissues .
Different methods have been employed to manage the PA, ranging from uterine conservation, which involves leaving the placenta in situ, to conventional hysterectomy. Classical cesarean sections (C- sections) prevent the excessive bleeding by leaving the adherent placenta in situ and by adopting strategic planning with a comprehensive analysis that aids the reduction in maternal morbidity and mortality rates .
Perinatal emergency hysterectomy is routinely used to avoid maternal morbidity and mortality . Given the fact that cesarean section history and placenta previa are major risk factors, the incidence of PAS disorders increases with the increasing rate of cesarean section .
Other risk factors include spontaneous or induced abortion, repeated miscarriages, in vitro fertilization embryo transfer, advanced maternal age, history of endometrial ablation, and previous uterine surgery .
Conservative and non-conservative management for PAS disorders have been compared. Cesarean hysterectomy is regarded as the safest and most practical, thereby remaining the management option of choice. Nevertheless, hysterectomy is associated with high rates of severe maternal morbidity. In cases of placenta percreta, especially with bladder invasion, owing to damage to pelvic organs and vasculature during hysterectomy .In recent years, with the application of an abdominal artery balloon and the improvement of surgical techniques, efforts are made to preserve the uterus for patients PAS. This is not only the improvement for fertility preservation, but also for better control of bleeding to reduce maternal morbidity.
The evidence on conservative management is considered low-quality, less reproducible, and operator-dependent. Critics noted the lack of histopathological confirmation or detailed differential diagnosis. Confounding factors in these studies needs to be controlled including the application of interventional techniques, the severity of placental invasion, and various placental positions and suture techniques .
Therefore, investigators will undertake a prospective study to analyze maternal and neonatal outcomes comparing women with PAS disorders treated with cesarean hysterectomy or conservatively.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Conservative management | – | Procedure: interventional techniques, the severity of placental invasion, and various placental positions and suture techniques150 patients |
| CS hysterectomy | – | Procedure: interventional techniques, the severity of placental invasion, and various placental positions and suture techniques150 patients |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 40 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
- Study population
- The aim of this study is to identify risk factors associated with performing cesarean hysterectomy versus conservative management in patients with placenta accreta spectrum (PAS).
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Pregnant women with history of previous cesarean section.
- Age above 18 years.
- Gestational age above 28 weeks.
- Confirmed diagnosis of Placenta previa accreta spectrum disorder by U/S or MRI if needed.
- U/S signs suggestive of placenta previa accrete (Green-top Guideline).
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Gestational age less than 28 weeks.
- Age less than 18years
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| interventional techniques, the severity of placental invasion, and various placental positions and suture techniquesClinically, severe complications of PA include severe obstetric hemorrhage leading to disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC), iatrogenic injury to the ureters, bladder, bowel, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), acute transfusion reactions, electrolyte imbalance, and renal failure. In women with PA, the expected blood loss at delivery is 3000- 5000 mL, About 90% of patients require a blood transfusion with 40% requiring more than ten units of packed cell transfusion | Procedure or surgery | CS hysterectomy, Conservative management |
Primary outcome
Number of the patient who diagnosed intraoperative with placenta accreta spectrum disorder and undergoing conservative management or hysterectomy
Time frame: from time of operation to diagnoses 1week
The diagnoses will be made based on intra-operative findings and/or pathologic features depending on the degree of placenta invasion (invading the myometrium or invading up to or beyond the uterine serosa). Patients with placenta accreta with complete peri-operative information will be included for further analysis.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Nov 2023.
- Background: PubMed 29214633Zeng C, Yang M, Ding Y, Duan S, Zhou Y. Placenta accreta spectrum disorder trends in the context of the universal two-child policy in China and the risk of hysterectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Mar;140(3):312-318. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12418. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
- Background: PubMed 26481753Yan J, Shi CY, Yu L, Yang HX. Folding Sutures Following Tourniquet Binding as a Conservative Surgical Approach for Placenta Previa Combined with Morbidly Adherent Placenta. Chin Med J (Engl). 2015 Oct 20;128(20):2818-20. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.167365. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 32498575Wang Q, Ma J, Zhang H, Dou R, Huang B, Wang X, Zhao X, Chen D, Ding Y, Ding H, Cui S, Zhang W, Xin H, Gu W, Hu Y, Ding G, Qi H, Fan L, Ma Y, Lu J, Yang Y, Lin L, Luo X, Zhang X, Fan S, Yang H. Conservative management versus cesarean hysterectomy in patients with placenta increta or percreta. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 May;35(10):1944-1950. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1774871. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
- Background: PubMed 26227006Thurn L, Lindqvist PG, Jakobsson M, Colmorn LB, Klungsoyr K, Bjarnadottir RI, Tapper AM, Bordahl PE, Gottvall K, Petersen KB, Krebs L, Gissler M, Langhoff-Roos J, Kallen K. Abnormally invasive placenta-prevalence, risk factors and antenatal suspicion: results from a large population-based pregnancy cohort study in the Nordic countries. BJOG. 2016 Jul;123(8):1348-55. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13547. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
- Background: PubMed 25460838Silver RM, Fox KA, Barton JR, Abuhamad AZ, Simhan H, Huls CK, Belfort MA, Wright JD. Center of excellence for placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 May;212(5):561-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.11.018. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
- Background: PubMed 26244528Silver RM. Abnormal Placentation: Placenta Previa, Vasa Previa, and Placenta Accreta. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep;126(3):654-668. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001005.
- Background: PubMed 29405320Sentilhes L, Kayem G, Chandraharan E, Palacios-Jaraquemada J, Jauniaux E; FIGO Placenta Accreta Diagnosis and Management Expert Consensus Panel. FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum disorders: Conservative management. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Mar;140(3):291-298. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12410. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 23869630Sentilhes L, Goffinet F, Kayem G. Management of placenta accreta. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013 Oct;92(10):1125-34. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12222.
- Background: PubMed 20177283Sentilhes L, Ambroselli C, Kayem G, Provansal M, Fernandez H, Perrotin F, Winer N, Pierre F, Benachi A, Dreyfus M, Bauville E, Mahieu-Caputo D, Marpeau L, Descamps P, Goffinet F, Bretelle F. Maternal outcome after conservative treatment of placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Mar;115(3):526-534. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181d066d4.
- Background: PubMed 27788743Liu HY, Lin XG, Wu JL, Qiao FY, Deng DR, Zeng WJ. [Multiposition spiral suture of the lower uterine segment: a new technique to control the intraoperative bleeding of pernicious placenta previa]. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Oct 25;51(10):754-758. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2016.10.009. Chinese.
- Background: PubMed 31627939Licon E, Matsuzaki S, Opara KN, Machida H, Roman LD, Sasso EB, Matsuo K. Treatment and outcome of placenta percreta: Primary cesarean hysterectomy versus conservative management. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Jan;244:201-203. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.09.017. Epub 2019 Sep 20. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 30214754Latif Khan Y, Rahim A, Gardezi J, Iqbal M, Hassan Z, Altaf S, Bhatti S. Conventional and conservative management of placenta accreta is two ends of a single continuum: A report of three cases and literature review. Clin Case Rep. 2018 Jul 13;6(9):1739-1746. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.1717. eCollection 2018 Sep.
Related trials for Placenta Accreta
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Placenta-Cervical Interface Angle for Predicting Placenta Accreta Spectrum Severity
Placenta Accreta Spectrum, Placenta Previa
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Hematological and Coagulation Markers in Predicting Placenta Accreta Spectrum in Placenta Previa
Placenta Accreta Spectrum, Placenta Previa
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Ultrasound Scoring System for Diagnosis and Prediction of Severity and Surgical Outcomes of Placenta Accreta Spectrum
Placenta Accreta, Third Trimester
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Total Lower Uterine Segmentectomy With Adjunctive Mechanical Towel Compression for the Surgical Management of Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorders
Placenta Accreta Management
Recruiting
Comparison Between 3 Conservative Surgeries for Placenta Accreta Spectrum
Placenta Accreta Spectrum
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Placenta Accreta, run by Nourhan Elsadany at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of the patient who diagnosed intraoperative with placenta accreta spectrum disorder and undergoing conservative management or hysterectomy (time frame: from time of operation to diagnoses 1week). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06105034, which also lists 17 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Nov 2023.