Multiple MyelomaMRDNCT06109233

A Perspective Study of the MRD-tailored Therapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma With Persistent Minimal Residual Disease After Initial Treatment

An observational study of Multiple Myeloma and Minimal Residual Disease, run by FengYan Jin at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

Who is it for?: Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for: Multiple Myeloma, Minimal Residual Disease
How many people: 80 participants
Where: 1 siteChina
Study dates: 10 Jan 2022to 10 Jan 2026
Phase: Observational
Are there results?: None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

Ages 18 years and older
All sexes
No healthy volunteers
Adult, Older adult

Study population: Diagnosed with multiple myeloma according to the 2014 IMWG multiple myeloma diagnostic criteria, receiving induction and consolidation therapy to achieve partial remission (PR) or better, and MRD-negative, or persistently MRD-positive and agreeing to adjust the treatment regimen.

Who may be able to join

Subject must be at least 18 years of age.
Subject must have documented newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma as defined by 2014 International Myeloma Working Group criteria.
Subject must have achieved a response (partial response [PR] or better based on investigator's determination of response by the IMWG criteria) to at one prior regimen.
Women of childbearing potential must commit to either abstain continuously from heterosexual sexual intercourse or to use 2 methods of reliable birth control simultaneously. Contraception must begin 4 weeks prior to dosing and continue until at least 3 months after receiving the last dose of the study drug. A woman of childbearing potential must have a negative serum or urine pregnancy tests at screening within 14 days prior to randomization.
Each subject (or their legally acceptable representative) must sign an informed consent form (ICF) indicating that he or she understands the purpose of and procedures required for the study and are willing to participate in the study.

Who cannot join

Subject has a diagnosis of primary amyloidosis, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, or smoldering multiple myeloma. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance is defined by presence of serum M-protein <3 g/dL; absence of lytic bone lesions, anemia, hypercalcemia, and renal insufficiency related to the M-protein; and (if determined) proportion of plasma cells in the bone marrow of 10% or less. Smoldering multiple myeloma is defined as asymptomatic multiple myeloma with absence of related organ or tissue impairment or end-organ damage.
Relapsed and refractory myeloma：Relapsed and refractory myeloma is defined as disease that is nonresponsive while on salvage therapy, or progresses within 60 days of last therapy in patients who have achieved minimal response (MR) or better at some point previously before then progressing in their disease course.
Primary refractory myeloma：Primary refractory myeloma is defined as disease that is nonresponsive in patients who have never achieved a minimal response or better with any therapy.
Subject is known or suspected of not being able to comply with the study protocol。 Subject has any condition for which, in the opinion of the investigator, participation would not be in the best interest of the subject or that could prevent, limit, or confound the protocol-specified assessments.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site, 1 recruiting

The First Hospital of Jilin University
Changchun, Jilin, 130021
Fengyan Jin, Professor, +8613844989638, fengyanjin@jlu.edu.cn
Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

The aim of this study was to observe the rate of MRD conversion and the impact on survival in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients with persistent MRD positivity after induction and consolidation therapy (autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or consolidation of the original regimen) who were switched to high-intensity therapy, and to compare the rate of persistent MRD-negativity, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) between the two groups in comparison with NDMM patients who achieved MRD-negativity after the same induction and consolidation therapy.

Read the detailed description

There is still an unmet clinical need as to whether NDMM patients with persistent MRD positive would benefit from switching to high-intensity therapy. The induction regimen (Dara+/- (Vd, Rd, Pd, VRd, VPd)) was selected based on the frail or high-risk status of NDMM patients. Transplantation or consolidation and maintenance regimens were adjusted by MRD status detected by NGF.

Conditions: Multiple Myeloma, Minimal Residual Disease
Keywords: Multiple Myeloma, MRD-tailored therapy, MRD status, MRD-negative rates, Survival
Medical subject headings: Multiple Myeloma, Neoplasm, Residual

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT06109233
Study group	Role	What they receive
MRD negativity		NDMM patients who obtained MRD negativity after induction and consolidation therapy
MRD positivity		NDMM patients who MRD positivity after induction and consolidation therapy and agree to adjust the treatment regimen

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

Adjusted treatment-adjusted MRD-negative rates
To explore the rate of conversion to MRD-negative after adjusting treatment in NDMM patients with persistent MRD-positive status.
Measured: through study completion, up to 2 years

Secondary outcomes (4)

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
PFS were calculated from the enrollment to the first instance of disease progression, relapse, or death
Measured: through study completion, up to 2 years
Overall Survival (OS)
OS were calculated from the time of enrollment to death or the last follow-up
Measured: through study completion, up to 2 years
Persistent MRD-negative rates and survival
Persistent MRD-negative rates and survival (including PFS and OS) in both groups compared to NDMM patients who achieved MRD-negativity after the same induction and consolidation therapy
Measured: through study completion, up to 2 years
Treatment related adverse event(TRAE)
Toxicity and safety will be reported based on the adverse events, as graded by CTCAE V5 and determined by routine clinical assessments.
Measured: through study completion, up to 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

10 Jan 202210 Jan 2026

First posted31 Oct 2023
Study start10 Jan 2022
Primary completion10 Jan 2025 (estimated)
Study completion10 Jan 2026 (estimated)

Resources

Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
Publications (26)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
Other trials for Multiple MyelomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design

Study type: Observational
Observational model: Cohort
Time perspective: Prospective
Enrolment: 80 participants (estimated)

IDs, dates and publications

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT06109233
Sponsor's protocol ID: MRD 2023
Acronym: MRD
Status last verified: Jul 2024
First submitted: 16 Oct 2023
Last updated: 5 Jul 2024
Results posted: No
Data monitoring committee: Yes
FDA-regulated drug: No
FDA-regulated device: No
Individual data sharing: Undecided

Publications

Kumar SK, Rajkumar V, Kyle RA, van Duin M, Sonneveld P, Mateos MV, Gay F, Anderson KC. Multiple myeloma. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017 Jul 20;3:17046. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.46.
PubMed 28726797
Anderson KC. Progress and Paradigms in Multiple Myeloma. Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Nov 15;22(22):5419-5427. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0625.
PubMed 28151709
Kumar SK, Rajkumar SV. The multiple myelomas - current concepts in cytogenetic classification and therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018 Jul;15(7):409-421. doi: 10.1038/s41571-018-0018-y.
PubMed 29686421
Maiso P, Huynh D, Moschetta M, Sacco A, Aljawai Y, Mishima Y, Asara JM, Roccaro AM, Kimmelman AC, Ghobrial IM. Metabolic signature identifies novel targets for drug resistance in multiple myeloma. Cancer Res. 2015 May 15;75(10):2071-82. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-3400. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
PubMed 25769724
Alonso S, Hernandez D, Chang YT, Gocke CB, McCray M, Varadhan R, Matsui WH, Jones RJ, Ghiaur G. Hedgehog and retinoid signaling alters multiple myeloma microenvironment and generates bortezomib resistance. J Clin Invest. 2016 Dec 1;126(12):4460-4468. doi: 10.1172/JCI88152. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
PubMed 27775549
Paiva B, Puig N, Cedena MT, de Jong BG, Ruiz Y, Rapado I, Martinez-Lopez J, Cordon L, Alignani D, Delgado JA, van Zelm MC, Van Dongen JJ, Pascual M, Agirre X, Prosper F, Martin-Subero JI, Vidriales MB, Gutierrez NC, Hernandez MT, Oriol A, Echeveste MA, Gonzalez Y, Johnson SK, Epstein J, Barlogie B, Morgan GJ, Orfao A, Blade J, Mateos MV, Lahuerta JJ, San-Miguel JF. Differentiation stage of myeloma plasma cells: biological and clinical significance. Leukemia. 2017 Feb;31(2):382-392. doi: 10.1038/leu.2016.211. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
PubMed 27479184
Jelinek T, Bezdekova R, Zatopkova M, Burgos L, Simicek M, Sevcikova T, Paiva B, Hajek R. Current applications of multiparameter flow cytometry in plasma cell disorders. Blood Cancer J. 2017 Oct 20;7(10):e617. doi: 10.1038/bcj.2017.90.
PubMed 29053157
Flores-Montero J, Sanoja-Flores L, Paiva B, Puig N, Garcia-Sanchez O, Bottcher S, van der Velden VHJ, Perez-Moran JJ, Vidriales MB, Garcia-Sanz R, Jimenez C, Gonzalez M, Martinez-Lopez J, Corral-Mateos A, Grigore GE, Fluxa R, Pontes R, Caetano J, Sedek L, Del Canizo MC, Blade J, Lahuerta JJ, Aguilar C, Barez A, Garcia-Mateo A, Labrador J, Leoz P, Aguilera-Sanz C, San-Miguel J, Mateos MV, Durie B, van Dongen JJM, Orfao A. Next Generation Flow for highly sensitive and standardized detection of minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2017 Oct;31(10):2094-2103. doi: 10.1038/leu.2017.29. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
PubMed 28104919
Puig N, Sarasquete ME, Balanzategui A, Martinez J, Paiva B, Garcia H, Fumero S, Jimenez C, Alcoceba M, Chillon MC, Sebastian E, Marin L, Montalban MA, Mateos MV, Oriol A, Palomera L, de la Rubia J, Vidriales MB, Blade J, Lahuerta JJ, Gonzalez M, Miguel JF, Garcia-Sanz R. Critical evaluation of ASO RQ-PCR for minimal residual disease evaluation in multiple myeloma. A comparative analysis with flow cytometry. Leukemia. 2014 Feb;28(2):391-7. doi: 10.1038/leu.2013.217. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
PubMed 23860448
Silvennoinen R, Lundan T, Kairisto V, Pelliniemi TT, Putkonen M, Anttila P, Huotari V, Mantymaa P, Siitonen S, Uotila L, Penttila TL, Juvonen V, Selander T, Remes K. Comparative analysis of minimal residual disease detection by multiparameter flow cytometry and enhanced ASO RQ-PCR in multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer J. 2014 Oct 10;4(10):e250. doi: 10.1038/bcj.2014.69.
PubMed 25303369
Martinez-Lopez J, Lahuerta JJ, Pepin F, Gonzalez M, Barrio S, Ayala R, Puig N, Montalban MA, Paiva B, Weng L, Jimenez C, Sopena M, Moorhead M, Cedena T, Rapado I, Mateos MV, Rosinol L, Oriol A, Blanchard MJ, Martinez R, Blade J, San Miguel J, Faham M, Garcia-Sanz R. Prognostic value of deep sequencing method for minimal residual disease detection in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2014 May 15;123(20):3073-9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-01-550020. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
PubMed 24646471
Avet-Loiseau H. Minimal Residual Disease by Next-Generation Sequencing: Pros and Cons. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2016;35:e425-30. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_159088.
PubMed 27249750
Perrot A, Lauwers-Cances V, Corre J, Robillard N, Hulin C, Chretien ML, Dejoie T, Maheo S, Stoppa AM, Pegourie B, Karlin L, Garderet L, Arnulf B, Doyen C, Meuleman N, Royer B, Eveillard JR, Benboubker L, Dib M, Decaux O, Jaccard A, Belhadj K, Brechignac S, Kolb B, Fohrer C, Mohty M, Macro M, Richardson PG, Carlton V, Moorhead M, Willis T, Faham M, Anderson KC, Harousseau JL, Leleu X, Facon T, Moreau P, Attal M, Avet-Loiseau H, Munshi N. Minimal residual disease negativity using deep sequencing is a major prognostic factor in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2018 Dec 6;132(23):2456-2464. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-06-858613. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
PubMed 30249784
Davies FE, Forsyth PD, Rawstron AC, Owen RG, Pratt G, Evans PA, Richards SJ, Drayson M, Smith GM, Selby PJ, Child JA, Morgan GJ. The impact of attaining a minimal disease state after high-dose melphalan and autologous transplantation for multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2001 Mar;112(3):814-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2001.02530.x.
PubMed 11260088
Paiva B, Vidriales MB, Cervero J, Mateo G, Perez JJ, Montalban MA, Sureda A, Montejano L, Gutierrez NC, Garcia de Coca A, de Las Heras N, Mateos MV, Lopez-Berges MC, Garcia-Boyero R, Galende J, Hernandez J, Palomera L, Carrera D, Martinez R, de la Rubia J, Martin A, Blade J, Lahuerta JJ, Orfao A, San Miguel JF; GEM (Grupo Espanol de MM)/PETHEMA (Programa para el Estudio de la Terapeutica en Hemopatias Malignas) Cooperative Study Groups. Multiparameter flow cytometric remission is the most relevant prognostic factor for multiple myeloma patients who undergo autologous stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2008 Nov 15;112(10):4017-23. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-05-159624. Epub 2008 Jul 31.
PubMed 18669875

Want to know more?

Each site lists its own contact. Pick the site nearest to you.

Talk to your doctor first and take this page with you. Only the study team can confirm whether you can join.

Questions to ask the study team

What is the study trying to find out?
What would I need to do, and how often would I visit?
Could I receive a placebo instead of the treatment?
What are the possible risks and benefits for me?
Will it cost me anything? Are travel or time paid for?
Can I keep seeing my own doctor during the study?
What happens when the study ends?

See locations

Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of YKST02 in Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)
RecruitingPhase 2
Engaging T-cells to Eliminate MRD in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Optimizing Response With Talquetmab and Teclistamab (ROTATE)
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Phase III Study of Eque-cel in Subjects With Len-refractory RRMM (FUMANBA-03)
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Window of Opportunity Trial to Learn if Linvoseltamab is Safe and Well Tolerated, and How Well it Works in Adult Participants With Recently Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Who Have Not Already Received Treatment
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Testing AZD5363 as a Potential Targeted Treatment in Cancers With AKT Genetic Changes (MATCH-Subprotocol Y)
Advanced Lymphoma, Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm

All Multiple Myeloma trials

Study at a glance

From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Jul 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.

Official title: A Perspective Study of the MRD-tailored Therapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma With Persistent Minimal Residual Disease After Initial Treatment
ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT06109233
Acronym / sponsor ID: MRD / MRD 2023
Conditions: Multiple Myeloma, Minimal Residual Disease
Keywords: Multiple Myeloma, MRD-tailored therapy, MRD status, MRD-negative rates, Survival
Study type: Observational
Recruitment status: Unknown status
Enrolment: 80 participants (estimated)
Lead sponsor: FengYan JinUniversity, hospital or other
Study start: 10 Jan 2022 (actual)
Primary completion: 10 Jan 2025 (estimated)
Study completion: 10 Jan 2026 (estimated)
First posted: 31 Oct 2023 (actual)
Results: Not posted in the source record

Clinical summary

The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.

Detailed description

Study design

Observational model: Cohort
Time perspective: Prospective
Number of arms: 2

Arm	Type	Receives
MRD negativity	–	–NDMM patients who obtained MRD negativity after induction and consolidation therapy
MRD positivity	–	–NDMM patients who MRD positivity after induction and consolidation therapy and agree to adjust the treatment regimen

Who may qualify

Ages: 18 years and older
Sex: All
Healthy volunteers: Not accepted
Age groups: Adult, Older adult
Study population: Diagnosed with multiple myeloma according to the 2014 IMWG multiple myeloma diagnostic criteria, receiving induction and consolidation therapy to achieve partial remission (PR) or better, and MRD-negative, or persistently MRD-positive and agreeing to adjust the treatment regimen.

Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)

Subject must be at least 18 years of age.
Subject must have documented newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma as defined by 2014 International Myeloma Working Group criteria.
Subject must have achieved a response (partial response [PR] or better based on investigator's determination of response by the IMWG criteria) to at one prior regimen.
Women of childbearing potential must commit to either abstain continuously from heterosexual sexual intercourse or to use 2 methods of reliable birth control simultaneously. Contraception must begin 4 weeks prior to dosing and continue until at least 3 months after receiving the last dose of the study drug. A woman of childbearing potential must have a negative serum or urine pregnancy tests at screening within 14 days prior to randomization.
Each subject (or their legally acceptable representative) must sign an informed consent form (ICF) indicating that he or she understands the purpose of and procedures required for the study and are willing to participate in the study.

Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)

Subject has a diagnosis of primary amyloidosis, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, or smoldering multiple myeloma. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance is defined by presence of serum M-protein <3 g/dL; absence of lytic bone lesions, anemia, hypercalcemia, and renal insufficiency related to the M-protein; and (if determined) proportion of plasma cells in the bone marrow of 10% or less. Smoldering multiple myeloma is defined as asymptomatic multiple myeloma with absence of related organ or tissue impairment or end-organ damage.
Relapsed and refractory myeloma：Relapsed and refractory myeloma is defined as disease that is nonresponsive while on salvage therapy, or progresses within 60 days of last therapy in patients who have achieved minimal response (MR) or better at some point previously before then progressing in their disease course.
Primary refractory myeloma：Primary refractory myeloma is defined as disease that is nonresponsive in patients who have never achieved a minimal response or better with any therapy.
Subject is known or suspected of not being able to comply with the study protocol。 Subject has any condition for which, in the opinion of the investigator, participation would not be in the best interest of the subject or that could prevent, limit, or confound the protocol-specified assessments.

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Primary outcome

Adjusted treatment-adjusted MRD-negative rates
Time frame: through study completion, up to 2 years
To explore the rate of conversion to MRD-negative after adjusting treatment in NDMM patients with persistent MRD-positive status.

4 secondary outcomes

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: through study completion, up to 2 years
Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: through study completion, up to 2 years
Persistent MRD-negative rates and survival
Time frame: through study completion, up to 2 years
Treatment related adverse event(TRAE)
Time frame: through study completion, up to 2 years

Results and safety

Results are not available in the source record.

Research links

Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Jul 2024.
Background: PubMed 28726797Kumar SK, Rajkumar V, Kyle RA, van Duin M, Sonneveld P, Mateos MV, Gay F, Anderson KC. Multiple myeloma. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017 Jul 20;3:17046. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.46.
Background: PubMed 28151709Anderson KC. Progress and Paradigms in Multiple Myeloma. Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Nov 15;22(22):5419-5427. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0625.
Background: PubMed 29686421Kumar SK, Rajkumar SV. The multiple myelomas - current concepts in cytogenetic classification and therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018 Jul;15(7):409-421. doi: 10.1038/s41571-018-0018-y.
Background: PubMed 25769724Maiso P, Huynh D, Moschetta M, Sacco A, Aljawai Y, Mishima Y, Asara JM, Roccaro AM, Kimmelman AC, Ghobrial IM. Metabolic signature identifies novel targets for drug resistance in multiple myeloma. Cancer Res. 2015 May 15;75(10):2071-82. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-3400. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
Background: PubMed 27775549Alonso S, Hernandez D, Chang YT, Gocke CB, McCray M, Varadhan R, Matsui WH, Jones RJ, Ghiaur G. Hedgehog and retinoid signaling alters multiple myeloma microenvironment and generates bortezomib resistance. J Clin Invest. 2016 Dec 1;126(12):4460-4468. doi: 10.1172/JCI88152. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
Background: PubMed 27479184Paiva B, Puig N, Cedena MT, de Jong BG, Ruiz Y, Rapado I, Martinez-Lopez J, Cordon L, Alignani D, Delgado JA, van Zelm MC, Van Dongen JJ, Pascual M, Agirre X, Prosper F, Martin-Subero JI, Vidriales MB, Gutierrez NC, Hernandez MT, Oriol A, Echeveste MA, Gonzalez Y, Johnson SK, Epstein J, Barlogie B, Morgan GJ, Orfao A, Blade J, Mateos MV, Lahuerta JJ, San-Miguel JF. Differentiation stage of myeloma plasma cells: biological and clinical significance. Leukemia. 2017 Feb;31(2):382-392. doi: 10.1038/leu.2016.211. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
Background: PubMed 29053157Jelinek T, Bezdekova R, Zatopkova M, Burgos L, Simicek M, Sevcikova T, Paiva B, Hajek R. Current applications of multiparameter flow cytometry in plasma cell disorders. Blood Cancer J. 2017 Oct 20;7(10):e617. doi: 10.1038/bcj.2017.90.
Background: PubMed 28104919Flores-Montero J, Sanoja-Flores L, Paiva B, Puig N, Garcia-Sanchez O, Bottcher S, van der Velden VHJ, Perez-Moran JJ, Vidriales MB, Garcia-Sanz R, Jimenez C, Gonzalez M, Martinez-Lopez J, Corral-Mateos A, Grigore GE, Fluxa R, Pontes R, Caetano J, Sedek L, Del Canizo MC, Blade J, Lahuerta JJ, Aguilar C, Barez A, Garcia-Mateo A, Labrador J, Leoz P, Aguilera-Sanz C, San-Miguel J, Mateos MV, Durie B, van Dongen JJM, Orfao A. Next Generation Flow for highly sensitive and standardized detection of minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2017 Oct;31(10):2094-2103. doi: 10.1038/leu.2017.29. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
Background: PubMed 23860448Puig N, Sarasquete ME, Balanzategui A, Martinez J, Paiva B, Garcia H, Fumero S, Jimenez C, Alcoceba M, Chillon MC, Sebastian E, Marin L, Montalban MA, Mateos MV, Oriol A, Palomera L, de la Rubia J, Vidriales MB, Blade J, Lahuerta JJ, Gonzalez M, Miguel JF, Garcia-Sanz R. Critical evaluation of ASO RQ-PCR for minimal residual disease evaluation in multiple myeloma. A comparative analysis with flow cytometry. Leukemia. 2014 Feb;28(2):391-7. doi: 10.1038/leu.2013.217. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
Background: PubMed 25303369Silvennoinen R, Lundan T, Kairisto V, Pelliniemi TT, Putkonen M, Anttila P, Huotari V, Mantymaa P, Siitonen S, Uotila L, Penttila TL, Juvonen V, Selander T, Remes K. Comparative analysis of minimal residual disease detection by multiparameter flow cytometry and enhanced ASO RQ-PCR in multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer J. 2014 Oct 10;4(10):e250. doi: 10.1038/bcj.2014.69.
Background: PubMed 24646471Martinez-Lopez J, Lahuerta JJ, Pepin F, Gonzalez M, Barrio S, Ayala R, Puig N, Montalban MA, Paiva B, Weng L, Jimenez C, Sopena M, Moorhead M, Cedena T, Rapado I, Mateos MV, Rosinol L, Oriol A, Blanchard MJ, Martinez R, Blade J, San Miguel J, Faham M, Garcia-Sanz R. Prognostic value of deep sequencing method for minimal residual disease detection in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2014 May 15;123(20):3073-9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-01-550020. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
Background: PubMed 27249750Avet-Loiseau H. Minimal Residual Disease by Next-Generation Sequencing: Pros and Cons. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2016;35:e425-30. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_159088.
Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided

Related trials for Multiple Myeloma

Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of YKST02 in Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)
RecruitingPhase 2
Engaging T-cells to Eliminate MRD in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Optimizing Response With Talquetmab and Teclistamab (ROTATE)
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Phase III Study of Eque-cel in Subjects With Len-refractory RRMM (FUMANBA-03)
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Window of Opportunity Trial to Learn if Linvoseltamab is Safe and Well Tolerated, and How Well it Works in Adult Participants With Recently Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Who Have Not Already Received Treatment
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Testing AZD5363 as a Potential Targeted Treatment in Cancers With AKT Genetic Changes (MATCH-Subprotocol Y)
Advanced Lymphoma, Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm

Referral and contact

AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.

The First Hospital of Jilin University

Changchun, China

+8613844989638

fengyanjin@jlu.edu.cn

1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Multiple Myeloma and Minimal Residual Disease, run by FengYan Jin at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Adjusted treatment-adjusted MRD-negative rates (time frame: through study completion, up to 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06109233, which also lists 26 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jul 2024.